The Artistry of the Homeric Simile, William C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Artistry of the Homeric Simile, William C About the Electronic Publication In addition to this book, The Artistry of the Homeric Simile, William C. Scott’s first book, The Oral Nature of the Homeric Simile (E. J. Brill: Leiden, 1974) has been issued as an electronic book by the Dartmouth ColleGe Library in 2009. The electronic versions of both books are publicly available for non-commercial use, free of charGe, at the website of the Dartmouth ColleGe Library: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~library/diGital/publishing/ These publications are the result of a partnership between the University Press of New EnGland, Dartmouth ColleGe Library, and Professor Scott. CopyriGht 2009, William C. Scott. The Artistry of the Homeric Simile . e Artistry of the Homeric Simile & Hanover, New Hampshire Published by Hanover and London dartmouth college press Published by University Press of New England, One Court Street, Lebanon, NH 03766 www.upne.com © 2009 by William C. Scott Printed in U.S.A. 5 4 3 2 1 This work has been published simultaneously in print and in electronic form. The author, William C. Scott, asserts his rights as copyright holder for both print and electronic versions. The print version of this book is available from UPNE, One Court Street, Lebanon, NH 03766. The electronic version is available for download by the public, free of charge, at the website of the Dartmouth College Library: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~library/digital/publishing/ scott2009. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Scott, William C. (William Clyde), 1937– The artistry of the Homeric simile / William C. Scott. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 978-1-58465-797-2 (pbk.: alk. paper) 1. Homer—Literary style. 2. Greek language—Figures of speech. 3. Oral-formulaic analysis. 4. Oral tradition— Greece. 5. Rhetoric, Ancient. 6. Simile. I. Title. pa4177.s5s28 2009 883'.01—dc22 2009016159 contents Preface · vii chapter one Similes, the Shield of Achilles, and Other Digressions · 1 The Usefulness of Book Divisions · 10 chapter two The Simileme: The Background of the Homeric Simile · 14 The Oral Nature of Homeric Verse · 14 The Simileme · 18 Homer and His Audience · 31 Simile and Simileme · 37 chapter three Homer’s Use of Similes to Delineate Character and Plot · 42 Iliad, Book 2: Ironic Characterization · 43 The Similes of Book 2 · 44 The Role of Similes in Book 2 · 59 Iliad, Books 21 and 22: Similes to Show a Thematic Contrast · 65 Iliad, Book 11: Similes to Mark a Shifting Scene · 78 Conclusion · 89 chapter four Similes to Delineate a Narrative Theme · 94 Iliad, Book 12: Direct Focus on a Single Theme · 94 Iliad, Book 5: The Use of Parallel Similemes to Create a Unified Theme · 102 Odyssey, Book 22: Similes to Interpret Typical Actions · 112 Odyssey, Book 5: Thematic Similes · 118 Conclusion · 126 chapter five Problem Books · 130 Iliad, Book 13: The Ordering of Conscious Chaos · 130 Iliad, Book 17: Similes as Guides through a Series of Type Scenes · 145 Iliad, Book 16: Similes for Complexity · 155 Conclusion · 171 chapter six The Creative Poet and the Co-creating Audience · 174 The Simile within the Narrative · 174 The Poet’s Choices in Forming the Individual Simile · 181 The Creative Moment: Poet and Audience · 185 Charts of Similemes: The Basic Motifs · 189 Notes · 207 Bibliography · 247 Index · 257 preface The similes in Homer are treasure troves. They describe scenes of Greek life that are not presented in their simplest form anywhere else: landscapes and seascapes; storms and calm weather; fighting among animals; aspects of civic life such as disputes, athletic contests, horse races, community enter- tainment, women carrying on their daily lives, and men running their farms and orchards. But the similes also show Homer dealing with his tradition. They are basic paratactic additions to the narrative showing how the Greeks found and developed parallels between two scenes, each of which elucidated and interpreted the other, and then expressed those scenes in effective poetic language. My earlier book, The Oral Nature of the Homeric Simile, identified series of repeated simile topics and common locations in the narrative with the goal of revealing the oral basis for the content of many of the similes as well as their placement. The current book, directed at the aesthetic qualities that Homer sought in forming each simile, represents that work’s other side. The first study focused more on the traditional alternatives that occurred to Homer as he composed; this second study explores the variations and modifications to each of the topics that Homer employs in order to make similes blend expres- sively with the larger context. The focus moves from compositional modes to aesthetic choices—from the poetic background to the act of creation by the poet and the act of reception by his audience. The major question for the second study is: how does the artist translate his thoughts into his chosen lan- guage? He does so through the indispensable participation of a co- creating audience. Thus the two books are meant to be a unified study of Homer’s similes as compositions derived from and dependent on an oral tradition. The second study is rooted in the mixture of traditional materials pres- ent to the poet every time he considers adding a simile to his narrative. No name has been assigned to this conglomerate of topics and scenes, of previ- ously successful placements of similes, of multiple choices available to the poet, of the alternate narrative techniques that poet and audience bring to the moment, and of the highly developed traditional language that was the birth- right of every Greek. Poet and audience together used their understanding of vii the means of expression and their memory of tales from the past as mutually helpful partners in creating Homer’s old-style “new” poetry. The similes are not presented sequentially or in their order of appearance in the narrative; rather, they are grouped by books and then analyzed as they fit broad functional categories. The first chapter shows how Homer has used expository digressions widely and effectively in telling his stories and how the similes can be approached as parallel narrative devices. The second chapter will analyze the poet’s and audience’s inheritance from previous performances of epic in order to determine the choices available to Homer in shaping his similes to support the narrative. The next three chapters examine those books in the Iliad and the Odyssey that contain the largest numbers of similes—in other words, the books where Homer seems to have chosen to give the simi- les major significance in his design. Finally, the conclusion attempts to imag- ine how a poet could have juggled all the elements that went into the series of choices that produced the individual simile. Together these chapters dem- onstrate my major point: the individual simile—even the shortest one—is the result of a complex process that requires the participation of both poet and audience. The translations are mine; I have everywhere tried to follow the original closely and have not added the Greek text of each simile. Many friends have aided me in completing this study. E. M. Bradley, E. ­Bakker, M. Edwards, J. Foley, J. A. W. Heffernan, C. Higbie, E. Minchin, G. Nagy, R. Rabel, H. Tell, W. G. Thalmann, and L. Whaley have been loyal guides as the book took shape. To them and to the many other friends and colleagues who have offered generous criticism, I offer my appreciation. The publication of this book in its double format has depended on close and friendly cooperation with the Dartmouth College Library and the Uni- versity Press of New England. I wish to express my thanks for the interest and enthusiasm of Michael P. Burton, the Director of the Press, and Jeffrey L. Horrell, the Librarian of the College, as well as Phyllis Deutsch, William Fon- taine, Elizabeth Kirk, and David Seaman. Hanover, New Hampshire W.C.S. viii · Preface The Artistry of the Homeric Simile chapter one Similes, the Shield of Achilles, and Other Digressions Similes are often repeated with very little change, they accumulate when there is no need, and they compare where there is nothing comparable. Great art would consist in making one large and highly appropriate simile. Homer becomes too carried away with his own similes and forgets narrative. m. de la motte1 In the eighteenth book of Homer’s Iliad Hephaistos makes a new shield for Achilles.2 The description of this shield is justly famed as a small master- work in its own right as well as being the prototype for later poets and writers who include art objects within their works.3 The most notable ancient exam- ples are The Shield of Heracles, the shields in the central scene of Aeschylus’ Seven against Thebes, the cup in Theocritus’ firstIdyll , the tapestry in Catullus’ epyllion on the marriage of Peleus and Thetis (c. 64), and the shield of Aeneas in book 8 of The Aeneid. These ekphrases occupy so large a portion of each work that they are necessarily major elements in the overall design.4 Homer often describes objects and implements in the course of his nar- rative, even pausing in the midst of events to present a detailed picture of some article drawn from the background. Book 11 of the Iliad contains three examples. The first and second are the descriptions of the breastplate and the shield of Agamemnon embedded in his arming scene (11.19–40); the third is “Nestor’s cup” (11.632–37). The presentation of each object is sufficiently detailed that it has been possible to find fragmentary yet often rather pre- cise remains that parallel the verbal descriptions.5 These descriptions focus sharply on physical features.
Recommended publications
  • The Hellenic Saga Gaia (Earth)
    The Hellenic Saga Gaia (Earth) Uranus (Heaven) Oceanus = Tethys Iapetus (Titan) = Clymene Themis Atlas Menoetius Prometheus Epimetheus = Pandora Prometheus • “Prometheus made humans out of earth and water, and he also gave them fire…” (Apollodorus Library 1.7.1) • … “and scatter-brained Epimetheus from the first was a mischief to men who eat bread; for it was he who first took of Zeus the woman, the maiden whom he had formed” (Hesiod Theogony ca. 509) Prometheus and Zeus • Zeus concealed the secret of life • Trick of the meat and fat • Zeus concealed fire • Prometheus stole it and gave it to man • Freidrich H. Fuger, 1751 - 1818 • Zeus ordered the creation of Pandora • Zeus chained Prometheus to a mountain • The accounts here are many and confused Maxfield Parish Prometheus 1919 Prometheus Chained Dirck van Baburen 1594 - 1624 Prometheus Nicolas-Sébastien Adam 1705 - 1778 Frankenstein: The Modern Prometheus • Novel by Mary Shelly • First published in 1818. • The first true Science Fiction novel • Victor Frankenstein is Prometheus • As with the story of Prometheus, the novel asks about cause and effect, and about responsibility. • Is man accountable for his creations? • Is God? • Are there moral, ethical constraints on man’s creative urges? Mary Shelly • “I saw the pale student of unhallowed arts kneeling beside the thing he had put together. I saw the hideous phantasm of a man stretched out, and then, on the working of some powerful engine, show signs of life, and stir with an uneasy, half vital motion. Frightful must it be; for supremely frightful would be the effect of any human endeavour to mock the stupendous mechanism of the Creator of the world” (Introduction to the 1831 edition) Did I request thee, from my clay To mould me man? Did I solicit thee From darkness to promote me? John Milton, Paradise Lost 10.
    [Show full text]
  • HOMERIC-ILIAD.Pdf
    Homeric Iliad Translated by Samuel Butler Revised by Soo-Young Kim, Kelly McCray, Gregory Nagy, and Timothy Power Contents Rhapsody 1 Rhapsody 2 Rhapsody 3 Rhapsody 4 Rhapsody 5 Rhapsody 6 Rhapsody 7 Rhapsody 8 Rhapsody 9 Rhapsody 10 Rhapsody 11 Rhapsody 12 Rhapsody 13 Rhapsody 14 Rhapsody 15 Rhapsody 16 Rhapsody 17 Rhapsody 18 Rhapsody 19 Rhapsody 20 Rhapsody 21 Rhapsody 22 Rhapsody 23 Rhapsody 24 Homeric Iliad Rhapsody 1 Translated by Samuel Butler Revised by Soo-Young Kim, Kelly McCray, Gregory Nagy, and Timothy Power [1] Anger [mēnis], goddess, sing it, of Achilles, son of Peleus— 2 disastrous [oulomenē] anger that made countless pains [algea] for the Achaeans, 3 and many steadfast lives [psūkhai] it drove down to Hādēs, 4 heroes’ lives, but their bodies it made prizes for dogs [5] and for all birds, and the Will of Zeus was reaching its fulfillment [telos]— 6 sing starting from the point where the two—I now see it—first had a falling out, engaging in strife [eris], 7 I mean, [Agamemnon] the son of Atreus, lord of men, and radiant Achilles. 8 So, which one of the gods was it who impelled the two to fight with each other in strife [eris]? 9 It was [Apollo] the son of Leto and of Zeus. For he [= Apollo], infuriated at the king [= Agamemnon], [10] caused an evil disease to arise throughout the mass of warriors, and the people were getting destroyed, because the son of Atreus had dishonored Khrysēs his priest. Now Khrysēs had come to the ships of the Achaeans to free his daughter, and had brought with him a great ransom [apoina]: moreover he bore in his hand the scepter of Apollo wreathed with a suppliant’s wreath [15] and he besought the Achaeans, but most of all the two sons of Atreus, who were their chiefs.
    [Show full text]
  • Ornithological Approaches to Greek Mythology: the Case of the Shearwater
    Ornithological Approaches to Greek Mythology: The Case of the Shearwater In the Odyssey 5.333-337, Ino-Leucothea rescues Odysseus from a terrifying storm while in the shape of an αἴθυια (aithyia) and gives him a magic veil so he can reach the land of the Phaeacians. But what bird is an aithyia, and, perhaps more importantly, can this information help us understand this passage of the Odyssey and other ancient texts where the bird appears? Many attempts at identifying Ino-Leucothea’s bird shape have been made. Lambin (2006) suggests that the name of byne that is occasionally (e.g. Lyc. Al. 757-761) applied to the goddess highlights her kourotrophic functions. In a more pragmatic way, Thompson (1895) suggests that the aithyia is a large gull such as Larus marinus. This identification is based on Aristotle (H.A. 7.542b) and Pliny (10.32) who report that the bird breeds in rocks by the sea in early spring. However, in a response to Thompson’s identification of a different bird, the ἐρωδιός (erôdios) as a heron, Fowler stresses that this bird nests in burrows by the sea (Pliny 10.126-127) and therefore must be Scopoli’s shearwater, Puffinus kuhli, now renamed Calonectris diomedea. The similarities between the aithyia and the erôdios prompted Thompson not only to reconsider his identification of the erôdios as a shearwater but also to argue that other bird names such as aithyia, memnôn, and mergus must also correspond to the shearwater. Thompson (1918) comes to this conclusion by taking a closer look at the mythological information concerning these birds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supplices of Euripides James Diggle
    The "Supplices" of Euripides Diggle, James Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Fall 1973; 14, 3; ProQuest pg. 241 The Supplices of Euripides James Diggle I ., , 42 LK€T€VW C€, Y€pCl.UX, ......, , \ 42/43 Y€pCI.LWV €t( CTOfLCl.TWV, TTpOC yovv" TTLTTTOVCCI. TO\ COV·I 44 tavofLoL T'KVCI. AVCCl.L '/"0' , .. 44/45 't' LfL€VWV V€KUWV ° L KCl.TCl.A€tTTOVCL fL'AYJ 46/47 OCl.VaTC[) AUCLfL€A€L OYJpdv OP€tOLCL j3opav. OMMENTATORS and emendators, with few exceptions, find the Cantecedent of the relative Ot in V€KVWV in line 44/45: " ... corpses which leave behind their limbs as a prey to beasts." The gibbering tjJvX~' knocking in vain at the gates of Hell, may have left its limbs behind as carrion. A corpse on the battlefield has abdicated control over its limbs: it does not enjoy the privilege of be­ queathing them to anybody. The conjectures of the interpreters in line 44 are not such as to redeem the improbability of their interpre­ tation: alla fLOL T'KVCI. AVCCl.L cfoOLfLEVWV V€KVWIl ed. Brubachiana and the early editors, rendered as "ut redimas mihi filiorum extinctorum cadauera" or "ut eximas meos liberos ex cadaueribus defunctorum," and modified by Brodaeus and Markland to avCI. fLOL KTA., "surge mihi, redime filios meos, etc."; alla A€LtjJCl.vCI. AVCCl.L Kirchhoff, ava fLOL CTtXCI. AvcCI.L Musgrave, a7T(~ CWfLCl.TCI. AVCCl.L Wecklein,1 avofL' Cl.LCX€CI. AVCCl.L Bruhn apud Murray. A few have tried a different path. Reiske and Markland find the antecedent of Ot in TEKVCI., and Markland offers a choice of three con­ structions for the phrase cfoOLfLEIlWV V€KVWV: (i) "ex cadaueribus defunc- 1 Ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Proper Names
    PROPER NAMES Acca 820 Aurunci 318 Achaeans 266 Ausoniae 41; Ausonii 253 Acheron 23 Achilles 9f., 14-28, 438; and Hector's Bacchus, and music 737 corpse 72-7; and Patroclus 42-58; Bellipotens 8 Achilles and ritual slaughter 82; death Bitias 396 anticipated 43, 45f., 54 Butes 690 Acoetes 30 Aconteus 612 Calydon 270 Adriatic, names for 405 Camilla 432; biography 535-96; name Aeneas 2; account of earlier events 113, 543; tomb 594; guilt 586; death 114; ancestry of 305; bonus I 06; 794-835; place of, in book xi, xiif. bound to kill Tu. 178f.; burial and corpse 892; vanity of 782 Aen. I 08 -19; commander 2-4, Caphereus 260 14 -28, 36; conflict of duties 94; Casmilla 543 deification of 125; Diomedes and Aen. Catillus 640 243-95; diplomacy of I 09; and des­ Chloreus 768 tiny 232; Evander and Aen. 152; Chromis 675 fama and arma of 124; father 184; Cicero 122-32 fights Tu. 434; good king I 06; Cloelia 535-96 Hector and Aen. 289; imperator 79, Clytius 666 446; just 126; magnanimity of 127; Coras 465; 604 mementoes of Dido 72-7; mourner Cybelo 768 39f., 42 58, 34; feeling for Pallas 36; Cyclopes 263 returns to narrative 904; victorious Cyrene 535-96 4; warrior 126; warrior hero 282fi; weeps 29, 41 Dardanidis 353 Aethon 89 Dardanium 472 Agamemnon 266ff. Demophoon 675 Amasenus 547 Dercennus 850 Amaster 673 Diana 535-96, 537, 591; vengeance of Amazon 648 857 Amazones Threiciae 659 Dido and cloaks given to A en. 72-7; Amazons 535-96, 571, Appx.
    [Show full text]
  • Provided by the Internet Classics Archive. See Bottom for Copyright
    Provided by The Internet Classics Archive. See bottom for copyright. Available online at http://classics.mit.edu//Homer/iliad.html The Iliad By Homer Translated by Samuel Butler ---------------------------------------------------------------------- BOOK I Sing, O goddess, the anger of Achilles son of Peleus, that brought countless ills upon the Achaeans. Many a brave soul did it send hurrying down to Hades, and many a hero did it yield a prey to dogs and vultures, for so were the counsels of Jove fulfilled from the day on which the son of Atreus, king of men, and great Achilles, first fell out with one another. And which of the gods was it that set them on to quarrel? It was the son of Jove and Leto; for he was angry with the king and sent a pestilence upon the host to plague the people, because the son of Atreus had dishonoured Chryses his priest. Now Chryses had come to the ships of the Achaeans to free his daughter, and had brought with him a great ransom: moreover he bore in his hand the sceptre of Apollo wreathed with a suppliant's wreath and he besought the Achaeans, but most of all the two sons of Atreus, who were their chiefs. "Sons of Atreus," he cried, "and all other Achaeans, may the gods who dwell in Olympus grant you to sack the city of Priam, and to reach your homes in safety; but free my daughter, and accept a ransom for her, in reverence to Apollo, son of Jove." On this the rest of the Achaeans with one voice were for respecting the priest and taking the ransom that he offered; but not so Agamemnon, who spoke fiercely to him and sent him roughly away.
    [Show full text]
  • Brothers Fighting Together in the Iliad
    BROTHERS FIGHTING TOGETHER IN THE ILIAD I We find in the Iliad numerous pairs of brothers (or half­ brothers on the father's side, or first cousins on the father's side) fighting together on foot or in the combination of chario­ teer-paraibates 1). And this is not confined to the men who are said to have taken part in the Trojan war, but it embraces the "mythical world of the past" 2), that of the demigods 3), the rivers 4) and even the gods 5). Moreover, if we turn to the leaders of the various groups of Greeks and Trojans, as given in book 11, we find that a 1). Such for example are: Ajax Telarnonius and Teucer (the Atav'ts, cf. p. 291), Mynes and Epistrophus (II 692f.), Phegeus and Idaeus (V 10f.), Echemon and Chromios (V 159 f.), Krethon and Orsilochus (V 542 f,), Aesepus and Pedasus (VI 21 f.), Hector and Alexander (VI 514 f., cf. VII 1 f.), Ascalaphus and lalmenus (IX 82f., cf. II 512), Peisandrus and Hip­ polochus (XI 122 f.), Hippodamus and Hypeirochus (XI 328 f.), Charops and Socus (XI 426 f.), the Molione (XI 750, 709 f.; XXIII 638 f.), Polybus, Agenor and Akarnas (XI 59 f.), Helenos and Deiphobus (XII 94 f,), Archelochus and Akamas (XIV 463 f.), Hector and Cebriones (XII 86 f.), Deiphobus and Polites (XIII 533 f.), Podarces and Iphiclus (XIII 693 f,), Deiphohus and Helenos (XIII 780 f.), Ascanius and Morys (XIII 792 f.), Atymnius and Maris (XVI 317 f.), Antilochus and Thrasymedes (XVI 322; XVII 377 f.; XVII 705), Euphorbus and Polydamas (XVII 1 f.), Chromius and Aretus (XVII 492 f.), Aretus and Hector (XVII 516), Polydorus and Hector (XX 407 f,), Laogonus and Dardanus (XX 460 f.), or Deiphobus and Hector (XXII 226 f.).
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Ludlum © the BOURNE ULTIMATUM
    Robert Ludlum © THE BOURNE ULTIMATUM 1 Robert Ludlum © THE BOURNE ULTIMATUM ROBERT LUDLUM THE UNSURPASSED MASTER OF THE SUPERTHRILLER AND ON SALE IN BANTAM HARDCOVER IN MAY 1993 THE SCORPIO ILLUSION 2 Robert Ludlum © THE BOURNE ULTIMATUM THE TRANSFORMATION The station wagon raced south down a backcountry road through the hills of New Hampshire toward the Massachusetts border, the driver a long-framed man, his sharp-featured face intense, his clear light-blue eyes furious. “We knew it would happen,” said Marie St. Jacques Webb. “It was merely a question of time.” “It’s crazy!” David whispered so as not to’ wake the children. “Everything’s buried, maximum archive security and all the rest of that crap! How did anyone find Alex and Mo?” “We don’t know, but Alex will start looking. There ’s no one better than Alex, you said that yourself—” “He’s marked now—he’s a dead man,” interrupted Webb grimly. “They’ll kill him and come after me ... after us, which is why you and the kids are heading south. The Caribbean.” “I’ll send them, darling. Not me.” “There’s nothing to discuss.” Webb breathed deeply, steadily, imposing a strange control. “I’ve been there before,” he said quietly. Marie looked at her husband, his suddenly passive face outlined in the dim wash of the dashboard lights. What she saw frightened her far more than the specter of the Jackal. She was not looking at David Webb the soft-spoken scholar. She was staring at a man they both thought had disappeared from their lives forever.
    [Show full text]
  • On History and Political Thought in Homer's Iliad, with a Focus on Books
    Defining Politics: On History and Political Thought in Homer’s Iliad, With a Focus on Books 1-9 by Andrew M. Gross A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Andrew M. Gross 2017 Defining Politics: On History and Political Thought in Homer’s Iliad, With a Focus on Books 1-9 Andrew M. Gross Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto 2017 ii Abstract The Iliad is a work of great literary complexity that contains profound insights and a wide- ranging account of the human condition. Some of the most important recent scholarly work on the poem has also emphasized the political dimension of Homer’s account. In this dissertation, I aim to contribute to our understanding of the Iliad as a work of political thought. Focusing on books 1 through 9 of the Iliad, I will try to show how we can discover in it a consistent chronological or historical account, even though at many points that history is not presented in a linear way, in the poem itself. Through various references we are able to discern an historical account of the entire cosmic order. Homer focuses on the newly established Olympian gods and, therewith, their need to enforce the crucial separation between themselves and human beings: that is, between their own status as immortals, and our condition as mortals. Homer’s history of the Trojan War, in turn, conveys crucial lessons about politics and the human condition. The dissertation traces the history of the war as it emerged from a private struggle and developed into a public war.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prehistory of Bomolochia
    The Prehistory of Bomolochia The Greek word bomolochia [βωμολοχία], which is attested first in the context of fifth century B.C.E. comedy and evolved into a general term for buffoonery, reveals in its etymology important tensions in the Greek sacrifice that were already present in very early Greek poetry. Etymologically, bomolochia means “lying in ambush at an altar,” presumably to cadge a portion of meat at a sacrificial banquet. The comic poets’ dramaturgy explains how this term came to mean buffoonery. In Aristophanes’ Birds, for instance, characters repeatedly use buffoonish tactics to wheedle shares of sacrificial meat from Pisthetaerus after he has set up his regime of birds. This comic motif of trying to get shares of sacrificial banquets lasts into New Comedy. The laughter that arises from attempts to get portions at a sacrificial banquet accords with two major theories of laughter: incongruity theory and superiority theory. Superiority theory maintains that laughter is an expression of derisory contempt by a superior towards an inferior (Ruch 2008). When the bomolochos attempts to attain a portion denied to him by his inferior status, superiors laugh at him in derision. Incongruity theory claims that laughter arises when two incongruous interpretive frames for the same phenomena conflict (Ruch 2008). We may laugh when dogs act like a humans because the interpretive frame created in appearance—that they are human—incongruously conflicts with the reality that they are dogs. Detienne, Vernant, and Saīd have established that sacrificial banqueting outlines a social order; it marks people’s social position by excluding them from or including them in sacrificial feasts, and, among those who are included, the portion received marks social rank: better portions indicate better rank.
    [Show full text]
  • The Faculty Advisor to the Student Writing the Thesis Wishes to Claim Joint Authorship in This Work
    WILLIAMS COLLEGE LIBRARIES Your unpublished thesis, submitted for a degree at Williams College and administered by the Williams College Libraries, will be made available for research use. You may, through this form, provide instructions regarding copyright, access, dissemination and reproduction of your thesis. _ The faculty advisor to the student writing the thesis wishes to claim joint authorship in this work. In each section, please check the ONE statement that reflects your wishes. 1. PUBLICATION AND QUOTATION: LITERARY PROPERTY RIGHTS A student author automatically owns the copyright to his/her work, whether or not a copyright symbol and date are placed on the piece. The duration of U.S. copyright on a manuscript--and Williams theses are considered manuscripts--is the life of the author plus 70 years. _ I/we do not choose to retain literary property rights to the thesis, and I wish to assign them immediately to Williams College. N",vnohllO the in no a s1lldent \,vo.rk: the studerv \VCHIJd} bO\Vevcf) need conLJct the in this case to also per'missir)D to sltilatlOn arose, the Archivcs wou!d be in had _I/we wish to retain literary property rights to the thesis for a period of three years, at which time the literary property rights shall be assigned to Williams College. Selectmg this the amhor a years to make use the in m><:o,mltI2 ,II/we wish to retain literary property rights to the thesis fer~ea of __":Y'88:F&;-Qf­ until my death, whichever is the later, at which time the literary property rights shall be assigned to Williams College.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Poetic Imagery Leaves and the Solemn Oath of Achilles
    Contents Melita Classica Fr Albert M. Grech O.P. (1883-1942): A Latin-to-Maltese literary and religious translator Melita Classica Ivan Said Maltese Productions of Classical Theatre in the Post-WWII Period Paul Xuereb Vol. 5 Katullu, Poeżija Nu. 3 2018 Jessica Farrugia 5 Vol. Crime and Punishment: Achilles in Homer’s Iliad Samuel Azzopardi 2018 Theseus in Modern Culture: The Labyrinth of Inception Melanie Zammit Poetic Imagery of Leaves and the Solemn Oath of Achilles Steve De Marco Pain and Pleasure: Oration delivered at the 2018 graduation ceremony Carmel Serracino Il-Bolla tal-Kolleġġjata tal-Għarb: Oration delivered at Prof. Vella’s 2018 book launch George Francis Vella ITER ILLVSTRISSIMI AC REVERENDISSIMI DOMINI FABII CHISII NVNTII APOSTOLICI AB INSVLA MELITENSI ROMAM Victor Bonnici (Ed.) Journal of the Malta Classics Association ISBN: 978-99957-943-0-9 classicsmalta.org y(7IJ9J5*RTONKT( 65 Poetic Imagery of Leaves and the Solemn Oath of Achilles Steve De Marco1 I have lived long enough. My way of life Is fall'n into the sere, the yellow leaf, And that which should accompany old age…2 These words, uttered by Macbeth when he is informed of the approach of the English army, invoke a potent mental image, one which connects a withered leaf which has fallen from a tree to the idea of the inevitability of death. It is no accident that Shakespeare chose this simile and placed it in the mouth of Macbeth, a man who would soon meet his destruction. However, this connection between leaves and the inevitability of death was no invention of Shakespeare.
    [Show full text]