Designing for Humans

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Designing for Humans Designing for Humans Nature aside, the world in which we live should be designed for us, from everyday products like scissors and chairs to complex systems in avionics, medicine and nuclear power applications. Now more than ever, technological advances continue to increase the range and complexity of tasks that people have to perform. As a discipline, human factors psychology (ergonomics) therefore has an increasingly important role to play in ensuring that the human user’s physical characteristics, cognitive abilities and social needs are taken into account in the development, implementation and operation of products and systems. In this book, Jan Noyes provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of human-machine interaction and the design of environments at work. Focusing on topics relevant to user-centred design, she includes coverage of the capabilities and limitations of humans, human-machine interactions, work environments, and organisational issues. Health and safety issues underpin a large amount of work on the human factors of design, and these are addressed fully in this book. Each chapter includes case studies that demonstrate the real-world relevance of the points being made and concludes with a list of key points. Although aimed primarily at advanced undergraduates, postgraduates and researchers in organisational and occupational psychology, this book will also be of relevance to students on engineering, computing and applied psychology/human factors programmes. Jan Noyes is currently Graduate Dean of Science at the University of Bristol. Her research and teaching interests are in the area of human factors psychology, and more specifically, the design of interfaces for advanced and emerging technologies such as automatic speech recognition, pen-based products and high level warning systems. In 1999 she was awarded the prestigious Otto Edholm medal for her contributions to applied research in ergonomics. She is the co-editor (with Chris Baber) of Interactive speech technology: Human factors issues in the application of speech input/output to computers, published by Taylor & Francis in 1993. Psychology at Work Series Editor: Peter Robinson Professor of Social Psychology, University of Bristol The Psychology at Work series provides comprehensive coverage of the central issues and debates in work and occupational psychology today. Its aim is to take specific areas or problems within the world of commerce, industry and public service, and establish a dialogue between their practical concerns and the academic theory and research of work and organisational psychologists. It is hoped that the series will provide a resource that generates debate and facilitates the process by which policy and practice become informed by (and inform) critically evaluated evidence-based research. The comprehensive text by Christine Doyle; Psychology in Organisations: An Introduction, covers the central areas of the subject. Further texts cover options found on advanced courses in work and organisational psychology or examine contemporary and controversial topics within the field. The series will be of use to undergraduate and postgraduate students on work and occupational psychology courses, and will be particularly suitable for the British Psychological Society specification syllabus of accredited MSc courses in occupational psychology. It will also be of interest to those professionals in business and management eager to find out more about how work and organisational psychology can inform and improve the working environment. Other forthcoming titles in this series: Psychology in Organisations: An Introduction Christine Doyle The Psychological Contract at Work Jackie Dyer and Nicky Hayes The Psychology of Health and Safety at Work Robert Parkinson, Paul Lyons and Andrew Tattersall Personal Development and Employment David Williams and Judi Irving Designing for Humans Jan Noyes First published 2001 by Psychology Press Ltd 27 Church Road, Hove, East Sussex, BN3 2FA Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Taylor & Francis Inc, 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003. Psychology Press is part of the Taylor & Francis Group © 2001 Jan Noyes http://www.psypress.co.uk All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Noyes, Janet M. Designing for humans/Jan Noyes. p. cm.—(Psychology at work) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN: 0-415-22721-6—ISBN: 0-415-22722-4 (pbk) 1. Human engineering. 2. Human-computer interaction. 3. Work environment. I. Title. II. Series. TA166 .N63 2001 620.8'2–dc21 2001019886 ISBN 0-203-46557-1 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-77381-0 (Adobe eReader Format) ISBN: 0-415-22721-6 (hbk) ISBN: 0-415-22722-4 (pbk) Cover design by Jim Wilkie For Emily Ceri The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends upon the unreasonable man. George Bernard Shaw, 1903, Man and Superman ‘Maxims for Revolutionists: Moderation’ Ergonomists must be ‘unreasonable’ in the sense that they will strive vigorously and increasingly to support a meaningful and productive relationship between technology and mankind, that technology and its products might be used for the ennoblement and fulfilment of mankind and not for its disenfranchisement and, finally, that instead of attempting to be the master of nature with its animals and flowers, man must learn to live harmoniously with them and with each other. J.M.Christensen, 1976 Contents List of tables viii List of figures ix Preface x Acknowledgements xiii 1 Human Factors 1 2 Humans: capabilities and limitations 20 3 Human-machine interaction 38 4 Work environments 70 5 Organisational issues 97 6 Occupational health 118 7 Safety 137 Epilogue 163 References 166 Annex 199 Author index 202 Subject index 207 vii Tables 1.1 Topics from the First International Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics and Engineering Psychology (1996) 8 1.2 Summary of milestones 15 3.1 Summary of controls 40 3.2 Speech and pen input: demands that can be met 46 3.3 Summary of screen design guidelines 54–5 3.4 Example of a Fitts’ list approach 60 3.5 Some disadvantages of the ‘list’ approach 61 3.6 Well-designed everyday products 66 3.7 Poorly designed everyday products 67 3.8 Some recommendations for the design process 68 4.1 Some examples of noise levels 91 5.1 Summary of recommendations for work organisation (based on Kroemer et al., 1994:329) 108 5.2 Summary of factors that influence performance (adapted from Christensen and Talbot, 1986) 109 viii Figures 1.1 Principal components of Human Factors 16 1.2 Relevant disciplines to Human Factors 16 2.1 The SHEL concept 21 2.2 Human information-processing model 26 2.3 The proposed integrated decision model 34 2.4 Smith’s (1997) three-dimensional classification of user types (reproduced with permission of the McGraw-Hill Publishing Company) 36 3.1 Human-machine interaction 39 3.2 Diagrammatic representation of the ANTEL keyboard layout 43 3.3 A fictional example of an object display 52 3.4 Mapping controls onto displays 57 4.1 Workstation dimensions diagram (from Cakir et al., 1980; reprinted with permission from IFRAS, Darmstadt, Germany (later reprinted by Wiley, UK)) 73 4.2 Example of SAMMIE display (reprinted with permission of SAMMIE CAD Ltd.) 74 7.1 ‘Swiss cheese’ accident model (based on Reason, 1990) 144 ix Preface A chair should be judged by one’s pants, a jewel by the light in a lady’s eyes, a typewriter by the hovering fingers. Time Magazine, On good design, 12 January 1959 When this quote was written, the study of human-machine interaction from a psychological perspective was in its infancy. Today, over 40 years later, we have a greater understanding of the design issues associated with human- machine interactions and work environments. This is in part due to the growing discipline of Ergonomics/Human Factors psychology. In 1996, for example, the International Ergonomics Association (IEA) had thirty-five federated and affiliated member societies. Today, this has grown to thirty- nine member societies. In 1996 there were about 17,000 ergonomists representing forty-five countries involved in professional activities under the umbrella of the IEA. The true number is likely to be higher given that the IEA does not include student members, associates or retired members. Further, some ergonomists do not belong to a professional organisation—some estimates place this at around 40 per cent. Finally, these figures are from 1996 and the overall trend has been towards an annual increase in numbers. Although the IEA includes countries from around the world, there is greater representation from some areas. Geographical areas that are well- represented include Australasia, Japan, Northern Europe, North America and Scandinavia. Although several new societies are currently being formed, there is comparably little ergonomic representation (and therefore, activity) in Africa, Latin America and the Middle East. This is important from the perspective of where the research is primarily being carried out and from where the material has been gathered in order to write this book. It has to be stated from the outset that this book has been written from a developed- world perspective. No attempt has been made to consider human-machine interactions and working conditions in communities and cultures where the emphasis is on manual labour rather than technologically driven systems. Writing such a book would indeed pose a considerable challenge. However, when considering the distribution of the world’s population, relatively few x Preface xi live in the developed world.
Recommended publications
  • Summary Double Your Typing Speed
    Summary Double Your Typing Speed.............................................................1 Stenography Benefits......................................................................1 Speed...........................................................................................................................................1 Fluency Of Thought....................................................................................................................2 Ergonomy....................................................................................................................................3 Mobile/Wearable Computing and Augmented Reality...............................................................3 Memorable Customizable Macros..............................................................................................4 Stenography Is Cool, But................................................................5 Open Source Stenography: Who Is Using It...................................5 Then I Saw The Light.....................................................................6 My Contributions............................................................................7 Stenography Is The Way.................................................................8 Machine stenography costs too much.........................................................................................8 Proprietary steno software might be better..................................................................................9 Learning takes too much
    [Show full text]
  • Gesture Keyboard Using Arduino
    www.ijcrt.org © 2021 IJCRT | Volume 9, Issue 5 May 2021 | ISSN: 2320-2882 GESTURE KEYBOARD USING ARDUINO P. R. Rodge1 Gawali Harshada2 Chaudhari Pooja3 More Mayur4 1Professor of Computer Engineering Department, SSJCOE, Maharashtra, India 2Student of Computer Engineering Department, SSJCOE, Maharashtra, India 3Student of Computer Engineering Department, SSJCOE. Maharashtra, India 4Student of Computer Engineering Department, SSJCOE, Maharashtra, India ABSTRACT Different keyboards are available in the market, with variations in size, layouts, programs, and functionalities. Recently, virtual keyboards are also in use but for every single keyboard, the user should remember the arrangement of keys in order to enter different characters. Remote-based gesture keyboard is a system that serves on the Internet of Things [IoT] architecture and embedded with Arduino as well as the accelerometer and machine learning process that enforces the system to perform in the desired direction. The remote-based gesture keyboard is the model, where the user can enter text and number in a text editor by moving a hand to the specific motion of characters in the air using Arduino. Arduino operates as a remote where gestures relocate into the air, translating into letters, and exposing them on a computer screen. Keywords— gesture, Arduino, remote, keyboard. I.INTRODUCTION The keyboard plays a vibrant role in the computer system for the entry of data by pressing the number of keys. In today’s generation screen touch keyboards are mostly used and gesture keyboards also used only for physically disabled people and for special use. There is plenty of variation in layouts of the physical keyboard such as AZERTY, QWERTY, Dvorak Colemak, Maltron, and JCUKEN.
    [Show full text]
  • An Improved Arabic Keyboard Layout
    Sci.Int.(Lahore),33(1),5-15,2021 ISSN 1013-5316; CODEN: SINTE 8 5 AN IMPROVED ARABIC KEYBOARD LAYOUT 1Amjad Qtaish, 2Jalawi Alshudukhi, 3Badiea Alshaibani, 4Yosef Saleh, 5Salam Bazrawi College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Saudi Arabia. [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT: One of the most important human–machine interaction (HMI) systems is the computer keyboard. The keyboard layout (KL) dictates how a person interacts with a physical keyboard through the way in which the letters, numbers, punctuation marks, and symbols are mapped and arranged on the keyboard. Mapping letters onto the keys of a keyboard is complex because many issues need to be taken into considerations, such as the nature of the language, finger fatigue, hand balance, typing speed, and distance traveled by fingers during typing and finger movements. There are two main kinds of KL: English and Arabic. Although numerous research studies have proposed different layouts for the English keyboard, there is a lack of research studies that focus on the Arabic KL. To address this lack, this study analyzed and clarified the limitations of the standard legacy Arabic KL. Then an efficient Arabic KL was proposed to overcome the limitations of the current KL. The frequency of Arabic letters and bi-gram probabilities were measured on a large Arabic corpus in order to assess the current KL and to design the improved Arabic KL. The improved Arabic KL was then evaluated and compared against the current KL in terms of letter frequency, finger-travel distance, hand and finger balance, bi-gram frequency, row distribution, and most frequent words.
    [Show full text]
  • Text Input Methods for Indian Languages Sowmya Vajjala, International Institute of Information Technology
    Iowa State University From the SelectedWorks of Sowmya Vajjala 2011 Text Input Methods for Indian Languages Sowmya Vajjala, International Institute of Information Technology Available at: https://works.bepress.com/sowmya-vajjala/3/ TEXT INPUT METHODS FOR INDIAN LANGUAGES By Sowmya V.B. 200607014 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science (by Research) in Computer Science & Engineering Search and Information Extraction Lab Language Technologies Research Center International Institute of Information Technology Hyderabad, India September 2008 Copyright c 2008 Sowmya V.B. All Rights Reserved Dedicated to all those people, living and dead, who are directly or indirectly responsible to the wonderful life that I am living now. INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Hyderabad, India CERTIFICATE It is certified that the work contained in this thesis, titled “ Text input methods for Indian Languages ” by Sowmya V.B. (200607014) submitted in partial fulfillment for the award of the degree of Master of Science (by Research) in Computer Science & Engineering, has been carried out under my supervision and it is not submitted elsewhere for a degree. Date Advisor : Dr. Vasudeva Varma Associate Professor IIIT, Hyderabad Acknowledgements I would like to first express my gratitude to my advisor Dr Vasudeva Varma, for being with me and believing in me throughout the duration of this thesis work. His regular suggestions have been greatly useful. I thank Mr Prasad Pingali for his motivation and guidance during the intial phases of my thesis. I thank Mr Bhupal Reddy for giving me the first lessons in my research. I entered IIIT as a novice to Computer Science in general and research in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Geekhack Geekhack Community => Ergonomics => Topic Started By: Oneproduct on Sun, 11 January 2015, 22:10:05
    geekhack geekhack Community => Ergonomics => Topic started by: oneproduct on Sun, 11 January 2015, 22:10:05 Title: Layout Analysis: Dvorak/Colemak/MTGAP/Carpalx/Workman/my own Post by: oneproduct on Sun, 11 January 2015, 22:10:05 Some interesting statistics based on the layout analyzer I mentioned in this other thread: https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=67430 (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=67430) The text used for this particular example was a book called "The Wasted Generation" which you can find at the Gutenberg project. I tested these layouts with a few other texts as well and the results are generally the same. A few comments on how I value some statistics: 1. Same finger is the most critical statistic. Having to type two letters in a row using the same finger (double letters don't count, such as LL in heLLo) is the slowest thing you can do. 2. Alternation is the next most important statistic. It allows your other hand to get ready to type the next key while the first hand is pressing the first key. 3. Inward rolls are very comfortable, something I learned from using Colemak. 4. Outward rolls are generally bad. If possible try to convert them to alternation or inward rolls. 5. I think that the G and H keys (positions given relative to QWERTY) are not "free" homerow positions. In the Workman layout, he talks about the lateral movement from F to G and from J to H being worse than the vertical movement in reaching from S to W or D to E for example.
    [Show full text]
  • View of Each General at Type Is Discussed
    Exploring Empirical Guidelines for Selecting Computer Assistive Technology for People with Disabilities A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science By Jennifer Border B.S., Wright State University, 2008 2011 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES DATE MARCH 7, 2011 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Jennifer Border ENTITLED Exploring Empirical Guidelines for Selecting Computer Assistive Technology for People with Disabilities BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science. Wayne Shebilske, Ph.D. Thesis Director Scott Watamaniuk, Ph.D. Graduate Program Director Committee on Final Examination John Flach, Ph.D. Chair, Department of Psychology Wayne Shebilske, Ph.D. John Flach, Ph.D. Clark Shingledecker, Ph.D. Andrew T. Hsu, Ph.D. Dean, School of Graduate Studies ii ABSTRACT Border, Jennifer. M.S., Department of Psychology, Wright State University, 2011. Exploring Empirical Guidelines for Selecting Computer Assistive Technology for People with Disabilities. Assistive technologies (AT) enable people with disabilities (PWD) who are unable to use traditional computer workstations to independently access computers. The selection process of AT is complex due to the numerous AT available and the specific needs of the user. This study examined the process to select new AT for a PWD with Arthrogryposis. In part 1, a series of two different typing sessions (typing test & journal response) were completed by three different AT (voice recognition (VRS), head tracker (HT), & brain computer interface (BCI)). In part 2 only journaling sessions using VRS & the user’s traditional typing method (touch screen) were completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Doctoral Thesis
    Czech Technical University in Prague Faculty of Electrical Engineering Department of Computer Graphics and Interaction Designing Text Entry Methods for Non-Verbal Vocal Input by Ing. OndˇrejPol´aˇcek A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor. PhD programme: Electrical Engineering and Information Technology Branch of study: Information Science and Computer Engineering June 2014 Thesis Supervisor: prof. Ing. Pavel Slav´ık,CSc. Department of Computer Graphics and Interaction Faculty of Electrical Engineering Czech Technical University in Prague Karlovo n´am.13 121 35 Praha 2 Czech Republic Thesis Co-Supervisor: Ing. ZdenˇekM´ıkovec, Ph.D. Department of Computer Graphics and Interaction Faculty of Electrical Engineering Czech Technical University in Prague Karlovo n´am.13 121 35 Prague 2 Czech Republic Copyright c 2014 by Ing. OndˇrejPol´aˇcek ii Abstract and contributions In recent years, a lot of research effort can be observed within the field of computer ac- cessibility focusing on design of text entry methods for people with various impairments. However, only little work have been devoted to non-verbal vocal input (NVVI), which is an interaction modality suitable for motor-impaired people. The main goal of this thesis is to study how non-verbal vocal input (NVVI) can be ap- plied to novel text entry methods and techniques in order to improve quality of life of motor-impaired people. This goal involves several aspects that needs to be explored in order to build a full picture of the problem. Solving each aspect brings us towards bet- ter understanding of the technology and the target users.
    [Show full text]
  • One-Handed Keyboards Quick Guide Created 8/05 Updated 6/06 PN, FB
    One-handed Keyboards Quick Guide Created 8/05 Updated 6/06 PN, FB Although standard computer keyboards are designed for two-handed use someone with just one hand can access a computer in several ways. Standard keyboards The most straight-forward technique is simply to use a standard keyboard. This technique means you can sit down at almost any machine and use it effectively. Five Finger Typist (£45) from Inclusive Technology is a program for teaching single-handed touch typing – either left or right hand. Single handed typists may also find it easier to type on a slightly smaller Compact Keyboard, which are also easier to position on a tray or lap because they are physically smaller than standard keyboards. Single-handed Dvorak keyboard layouts The standard QWERTY layout is not designed for single-handed typing, but you can re-map the keys on a standard keyboard to use a different ‘Dvorak’ layout optimised for either left or right- handed use. Once you have re-mapped the keyboard, lever off the keys and re-position them, or use key stickers to re-label the keys. Dvorak Left-handed keyboard Dvorak layouts can be set within the Mac and Windows operating systems, or downloaded and installed for free. On Windows XP, for example, go to Start > Control Panel > Regional and Language > Languages > Details > Add, then tick Keyboard layout and choose ‘United States – Dvorak’ (for both, left or right hands). Look in the Help for your own computer, or do a search for ‘Dvorak keyboard’ on the internet for more information. A disadvantage with this technique is that you have to change the keyboard layout on every computer you use, and also carry your Dvorak keyboard with you.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced and Natural Interaction System for Motion-Impaired Users
    Universitat de les Illes Balears Departament de Ci`enciesMatem`atiquesi Inform`atica Tesis Doctoral Advanced and natural interaction system for motion-impaired users Cristina Suemay Manresa Yee Dirigida por: Dr. Francisco Perales L¶opez Dr. Javier Varona G¶omez Junio 2009 i Dr. Francisco Jos¶ePerales Lopez. Profesor Titular de Universidad. Departamento de Matem¶aticase Inform¶atica. Universitat de les Illes Balears. Dr. Javier Varona G¶omez. Ram¶ony Cajal. Departamento de Matem¶aticase Inform¶atica. Universitat de les Illes Balears. HACEN CONSTAR: Que la memoria titulada Advanced and natural interaction system for motion- im- paired users ha sido realizada por Cristina Suemay Manresa Yee bajo nuestra di- recci¶onen el Departamento de Matem¶aticase Inform¶aticade la Universitat de les Illes Balears y constituye la tesis para optar al Grado de Doctor en Inform¶atica. Palma de Mallorca, Junio de 2009 iii Dr. Francisco Jos¶ePerales L¶opez Director de la tesis Dr. Javier Varona G¶omez Director de la tesis Cristina Suemay Manresa Yee Doctorando iv A todos los que hicieron posible esta tesis. v vi Agradecimientos Acabada la memoria de la tesis, me gustar¶³aagradecer a muchas personas su ayuda y apoyo por haber hecho este camino largo algo m¶asdulce. Primero a mi familia, sobretodo a mis padres y a mi hermano porque han estado siempre all¶³en todo y para todo. A Moncho, ¶elsabe el porqu¶e.(63353178343) A mis amigos y a Ana por no parar de preguntar cuando presentaba la tesis y por ayudarme a desconectar. :) A Pere, Miquel, Miquel `El Artista', Toni, Fontanet, Angel,¶ Manolo, Jos¶eMar¶³a, Mar¶³aJos¶e,Biel, Lloren»c,Arnau, Ricardo, Margaret, Jose Luis Ortego, Simon, Vic- tor, a los que siempre me encuentro por pasillo, a los del otro laboratorio .
    [Show full text]
  • Fully in the Information and Communication Society
    ATLEC Project – WP3 Contract No: 518229-LLP-1-2011-UK-LEONARDO-LMP ATLEC Assistive Technology Learning Through A Unified Curriculum “ATLEC Training course” WP number WP3 Deliverable number 3.2 Development of curriculum, preparation of training courses and production of training WP title materials Status FINAL Project start date 01/01/2012 Project duration 26 months Author PhoenixKM For further information related to the ATLEC project please visit: The project website (atlec-project.eu); Facebook page (facebook.com/ATLECproject); Twitter page (twitter.com/ATLEC_project/). The ATLEC (Assistive Technology Learning Through A Unified Curriculum – 518229-LLP-1-2011-1-UK-LEONARDO-LMP) project has been partially funded under the Lifelong Learning program. This publication reflects the views only of the author(s), and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. July, 2013 1 ATLEC website: http://atlec-project.eu/ ATLEC Project – WP3 Contract No: 518229-LLP-1-2011-UK-LEONARDO-LMP Introduction Studies throughout Europe under ACCESSIBLE and AEGIS (FP7 projects), and KA3 project IMPACT highlighted in their pan-European surveys with over 1000 end-users and Assistive Technology (AT) specialists that training is the core barrier towards using assistive technology (AT) by end-users. This lack of training is subsequently also recognised as the main barrier to acquiring gainful employment in a (regular) working environment. A quick assessment of the ATLEC partner countries raised the following issues: Belgium: Although there is some ICT AT training available by suppliers, and special vocational training centres for adults, it is time limited and expensive.
    [Show full text]
  • The Buxton - Microsoft Collection Inventory of Interactive Device Collection
    The Buxton - Microsoft Collection Inventory of Interactive Device Collection Bill Buxton First Draft: August 29th, 2011 Contents: 1. Mice 11. Pen Computers 2. Tablet Pucks and Pens 12. Watches 3. Touch Pads 13. Wearables: Gloves, Rings, 4. Touch Screens Heads, etc. 5. Joysticks 14. Pedals 6. Trackballs 15. Game Controllers & Toys 7. Chord Keyboards 16. Remote Controls 8. Keyboards 17. Dials 9. Handhelds, PDAs, Music 18. Miscellaneous Players, Games, Mobile 19. Reference Material, Toys, … Phones 20. Purging from Collection 10. e-Readers Note: • Devices that have a “Y” in the right-most column are included in the current collection web-site which can be accessed here: https://www.microsoft.com/buxtoncollection. Note that perhaps less than 1/3 of the collection is on-line, and for the most part, the entries for those that are on-line are minimal (though hopefully still useful), compared to what is being prepared. A new, complete site is under curation and will be posted as soon as possible – but don’t hold your breath. It’s a big job. • Devices with a red “N” in the rightmost column are in the process of being documented and prepared for inclusion on the web site. For requests for photos or other details of items not yet on the site, contact me via email. • The Catalogue Code in the second column tells me where the item is stored. This code is in the form BBB-NNN, where BBB is the bin code & NNN (not always used) is the 3-digit item number in that bin Page 1 of 146 Version: May 12, 2021 Mice Photo Code Name Year Price Compan Notes Pivot? y M-06 NRC 1968 NFS National Donated by Nestor Burtnyk.
    [Show full text]
  • Discrete and Continuous Shape Writing for Text Entry and Control
    Linköping Studies in Science and Technology Dissertation No. 1106 Discrete and Continuous Shape Writing for Text Entry and Control Per Ola Kristensson Department of Computer and Information Science Linköping University 581 83 Linköping, Sweden Linköping 2007 ISBN 978-91-85831-77-7 ISSN 0345-7524 Printed by LiU-Tryck, Linköping 2007 Abstract Mobile devices gain increasing computational power and storage capabilities, and there are already mobile phones that can show movies, act as digital music players and offer full-scale web browsing. The bottleneck for information flow is however limited by the inefficient communication channel between the user and the small device. The small mobile phone form factor has proven to be surprisingly difficult to overcome and limited text entry capabilities are in effect crippling mobile devices’ use experience. The desktop keyboard is too large for mobile phones, and the keypad too limited. In recent years, advanced mobile phones have come equipped with touch- screens that enable new text entry solutions. This dissertation explores how software keyboards on touch-screens can be improved to provide an efficient and practical text and command entry experience on mobile devices. The central hypothesis is that it is possible to combine three elements: software keyboard, language redundancy and pattern recognition, and create new effective interfaces for text entry and control. These are collectively called “shape writing” interfaces. Words form shapes on the software keyboard layout. Users write words by articulating the shapes for words on the software keyboard. Two classes of shape writing interfaces are developed and analyzed: discrete and continuous shape writing. The former recognizes users’ pen or finger tapping motion as discrete patterns on the touch-screen.
    [Show full text]