DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report 2015 Annual Report 2015 International Version Preface The year under review has once again shown how much people trust the Austrian Ombudsman Board (AOB) to provide help, to explain unclear issues and to bring their matters to a positive end. A study which was commissioned in 2015 has impressively substantiated the high level of awareness of the AOB as such and the confidence in its work. Nevertheless, continuous efforts are being undertaken to make access to the AOB even simpler and to report about its activities more comprehensively. Complaints to the AOB comprised federal administration throughout all of Austria as well as regional and municipal administration in seven of the nine Laender. People from all over Austria approach the AOB and while achieving solutions is among our most important responsibilities, we also provide explanations about laws and administrative procedures that are connected to them. Knowing why authorities have acted in a certain way can result in better understanding and reduce the feeling of annoyance. Authorities are bound by the laws and the AOB can make the legislative bodies, to which it reports on a regular basis, aware of a lack of understanding of these laws. Since July 2012 the AOB fulfills the mandate to protect and promote human rights, granted to it under Austrian constitutional law. This mandate includes a mandate according to OPCAT, a mandate as independent monitoring authority according to Article 16.3 of the CRPD and a mandate to monitor and concomitantly examine the behavior of organs authorized to issue direct orders or carry out coercive measures. In the past three and a half years, the NPM commissions conducted 1,575 visits, of which 501 took place in 2015. We would like to thank Federal Ministries and other federal, regional and municipal bodies for their excellent cooperation in 2015. We also thank the NPM commissions for their ongoing commitment and the Human Righs Advisory Council for its continuous support. A special thank you is owed to our employees without whom the work of the AOB, which is highly appreciated by the entire population, would not be possible. Günther Kräuter Gertrude Brinek Peter Fichtenbauer Vienna, October 2016 I. THE AUSTRIAN OBMDUSMAN BOARD 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................7 1.1 Structure of the AOB ...................................................................................................... 7 2. The members of the AOB take stock ........................................................................................... 8 2.1 Ombudsman Peter Fichtenbauer ...................................................................................8 2.2 Ombudsman Günther Kräuter ......................................................................................10 2.3 Ombudswoman Gertrude Brinek .................................................................................12 3. Public relations ..........................................................................................................................15 4. International activities ..............................................................................................................17 4.1 International Ombudsman Instititute (IOI) ...................................................................17 4.2 International cooperation ............................................................................................ 18 II. EX-POST CONTROL 1. Performance record ..................................................................................................................25 1.1 Monitoring public administration .................................................................................25 1.2 Budget and personnel .................................................................................................. 31 1.3 Projects ......................................................................................................................... 32 2. Anti-Discrimination ...................................................................................................................35 2.1 National Action Plan for Human Rights ........................................................................35 2.2 Austria-wide investigation regarding enforcement of ban on discrimination ..............39 2.3 Barrier-free accessibility ............................................................................................... 51 3. Investigating human rights .......................................................................................................53 3.1 Labour, social affairs and consumer protection ............................................................53 3.2 Education and women .................................................................................................. 56 3.3 Family and youth .......................................................................................................... 57 3.4 Finances ........................................................................................................................ 59 3.5 Interior.......................................................................................................................... 62 3.6 Judiciary ........................................................................................................................ 69 3.7 National defence and sports ........................................................................................78 III. NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISM (NPM) 1. Overview ...................................................................................................................................83 1.1 Mandate and understanding of the mandate ..............................................................83 1.2 Developments within the NPM reporting year ............................................................85 1.3 Personnel changes in the commissions .......................................................................87 1.4 Second shadow monitoring for NPM ...........................................................................88 1.5 Monitoring and control visits in numbers ....................................................................89 1.6 Budget .......................................................................................................................... 91 1.7 Human resources ......................................................................................................... 92 1.8 Reports of the commissions .........................................................................................96 1.9 Report of the Human Rights Advisory Council .............................................................98 2. Findings and recommendations ............................................................................................... 99 2.1 Retirement and nursing homes ....................................................................................99 2.2 Hospitals and psychiatric institutions and facilities ....................................................115 2.3 Child and youth welfare facilities ...............................................................................128 2.4 Institutions and facilities for persons with disabilities................................................140 2.5 Correctional institutions .............................................................................................156 2.6 Police institutions and barracks ..................................................................................187 2.7 Coercive acts .............................................................................................................. 208 IV. ANNEX Annex I - Monitoring framework, methodology and further action by NPM ..............................219 Annex II - List of recommendations by the AOB and its commissions ........................................223 The Austrian Ombudsman Board I. THE AUSTRIAN OBMDUSMAN BOARD 1. Introduction The AOB has the responsibility of helping citizens obtain justice if they feel they have Ex-post control not been treated fairly by the Austrian public administration. Complaints and their investigation not only point out deficiencies in individual cases, but also provide indications where there are weak points or adverse developments in public administration. The AOB’s outside view gives public administration the opportunity to take the necessary organisational measures, which can range from an improvement of workflows to more intensive employee training. Within the scope of its preventive activities, the AOB endeavours to prevent or reduce Preventive activities violations of human rights when and wherever possible, but especially in institutions and facilities where persons are being detained and/or their freedom is restricted. Within this mandate, the individual case is not so much in the AOB’s focus, but rather the system as such, should it be classified as needing improvement. The commissions of the AOB play an important part in this preventive work, as it is their responsibility to examine the circumstances directly on-site. Since 2009, the AOB is hosting the General Secretariat of the International Ombudsman International Ombudsman Institute (IOI). The IOI supports and promotes the exchange of experience with other Institute Ombudsman institutions worldwide in order to ensure the quality of the activities undertaken and to develop
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Austrian Ombudsman Board Annual Report 2018 on the Activities of the Austrian National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) Protection & Promotion of Human Rights
    Austrian Ombudsman Board Annual Report 2018 on the activities of the Austrian National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) Protection & Promotion of Human Rights Preface This report documents the activities of the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) in 2018. More than 500 monitoring visits were carried out, most of them in public and private institutions and facilities where the freedom of individuals is restricted. The responsible ministries, supervisory authorities and the affected institutions and facilities were informed about the results of the visits in detail. The NPM also strongly advocated in the year under review that the identified deficits should be rectified as quickly as possible. A large number of presentations and information events were held with the goal of raising public awareness and placing the protection of human rights on a broad basis. International cooperation was further intensified above and beyond these nationwide activities. All of these measures have a common objective: they serve to protect persons from being treated in an inhuman or degrading manner. Human dignity is at considerable risk in places where persons’ liberty is deprived in particular, such as in correctional institutions, police detention centres or retirement and nursing homes. Persons living in such places have little chance to be heard, as they have only limited contact to the outside world. To a large extent, they are at the mercy of the staff of the respective institution or facility or they are, at least, in a dependent position. This inevitably leads to precarious situations. The essence of the preventive mandate is to detect these risks as early as possible and to help in avoiding maladministration before it occurs.
    [Show full text]
  • West Bank and Gaza 2020 Human Rights Report
    WEST BANK AND GAZA 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Palestinian Authority basic law provides for an elected president and legislative council. There have been no national elections in the West Bank and Gaza since 2006. President Mahmoud Abbas has remained in office despite the expiration of his four-year term in 2009. The Palestinian Legislative Council has not functioned since 2007, and in 2018 the Palestinian Authority dissolved the Constitutional Court. In September 2019 and again in September, President Abbas called for the Palestinian Authority to organize elections for the Palestinian Legislative Council within six months, but elections had not taken place as of the end of the year. The Palestinian Authority head of government is Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh. President Abbas is also chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization and general commander of the Fatah movement. Six Palestinian Authority security forces agencies operate in parts of the West Bank. Several are under Palestinian Authority Ministry of Interior operational control and follow the prime minister’s guidance. The Palestinian Civil Police have primary responsibility for civil and community policing. The National Security Force conducts gendarmerie-style security operations in circumstances that exceed the capabilities of the civil police. The Military Intelligence Agency handles intelligence and criminal matters involving Palestinian Authority security forces personnel, including accusations of abuse and corruption. The General Intelligence Service is responsible for external intelligence gathering and operations. The Preventive Security Organization is responsible for internal intelligence gathering and investigations related to internal security cases, including political dissent. The Presidential Guard protects facilities and provides dignitary protection.
    [Show full text]
  • The London School of Economics and Political Science Making EU
    The London School of Economics and Political Science Making EU Foreign Policy towards a ‘Pariah’ State: Consensus on Sanctions in EU Foreign Policy towards Myanmar Arthur Minsat A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, June 2012 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorization does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 97,547 words. Statement of use of third party for editorial help I can confirm that my thesis was copy edited for conventions of language, spelling and grammar by Dr. Joe Hoover. 2 Abstract This thesis seeks to explain why the European Union ratcheted up restrictive measures on Myanmar from 1991 until 2010, despite divergent interests of EU member states and the apparent inability of sanctions to quickly achieve the primary objectives of EU policy. This empirical puzzle applies the ‘sanctions paradox’ to the issue of joint action in the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Masterarbeit / Master's Thesis
    MASTERARBEIT / MASTER’S THESIS Titel der Masterarbeit / Title of the Master’s Thesis „Privatisierte Sicherheit. Fluch oder Segen?“ verfasst von / submitted by Timotheus Torner, BA angestrebter akademischer Grad / in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (MA) Wien, 2016 / Vienna, 2016 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt / A 066 589 degree programme code as it appears on the student record sheet: Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt / Masterstudium Internationale Entwicklung degree programme as it appears on the student record sheet: Betreut von / Supervisor: Dr. Helmut Krieger 1 Abkürzungsverzeichnis ADA Austrian Development Agency CARE Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere CIMIC Civil-Military Cooperation DfID Department for International Development ECHO European Commission Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations GIZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit FAO Food and Agriculture Organization ICRC International Committee of the Red Cross IFRC International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies IOM International Organization for Migration MSF Médecins Sans Frontières (Ärzte ohne Grenzen) NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization NGO Non-Governmental Organization NRC Norwegian Refugee Council OCHA Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs OECD Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development PMC Private military companies PMF Private military firm PMSC Private military and security companies PRT Provincial Reconstruction Teams 2 PSC Private security
    [Show full text]
  • Factsheet: Promoting Freedom of Religion Or Belief Within the United
    UNITED STATES COMMISSION on INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM FACTSHEET October 2020 UN HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM Gayle Manchin Promoting Freedom of Religion or Belief within the United Nations Chair Human Rights System Tony Perkins Vice Chair By Kirsten Lavery, Supervisory Policy Analyst Anurima Bhargava Vice Chair Pursuant to the International Religious Freedom Act (IRFA), the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) monitors freedom of religion or Commissioners belief abroad using international human rights standards, including the Universal Gary Bauer Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the International Covenant on Civil and James W. Carr Political Rights (ICCPR). Within the United Nations (UN) system, there are a variety of charter and treaty-based mechanisms with mandates that address international Frederick A. Davie human rights issues according to the same standards. This factsheet describes Nadine Maenza those mechanisms, with a particular focus on those most relevant to freedom of Johnnie Moore religion or belief. Although these bodies have various imperfections and limitations, Nury Turkel they nevertheless provide opportunities for advocacy by and collaboration among states and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) working to promote religious freedom internationally. Erin D. Singshinsuk Executive Director UN Human Rights Focused Mechanisms Charter-Based Mechanisms: UN charter-based mechanisms are mandated through resolutions of the principal organs of the UN that were established by the UN Charter. USCIRF’s Mission Currently, the charter-based human rights mechanisms are the Human Rights Council (HRC) and its subsidiaries. HRC: The HRC is an inter-governmental body of 47 member states that was To advance international established in 2006 by General Assembly Resolution 60/251 as a subsidiary body to the UN General Assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 June 8, 2020 to Members of The
    June 8, 2020 To Members of the United Nations Human Rights Council Re: Request for the Convening of a Special Session on the Escalating Situation of Police Violence and Repression of Protests in the United States Excellencies, The undersigned family members of victims of police killings and civil society organizations from around the world, call on member states of the UN Human Rights Council to urgently convene a Special Session on the situation of human rights in the United States in order to respond to the unfolding grave human rights crisis borne out of the repression of nationwide protests. The recent protests erupted on May 26 in response to the police murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis, Minnesota, which was only one of a recent string of unlawful killings of unarmed Black people by police and armed white vigilantes. We are deeply concerned about the escalation in violent police responses to largely peaceful protests in the United States, which included the use of rubber bullets, tear gas, pepper spray and in some cases live ammunition, in violation of international standards on the use of force and management of assemblies including recent U.N. Guidance on Less Lethal Weapons. Additionally, we are greatly concerned that rather than using his position to serve as a force for calm and unity, President Trump has chosen to weaponize the tensions through his rhetoric, evidenced by his promise to seize authority from Governors who fail to take the most extreme tactics against protestors and to deploy federal armed forces against protestors (an action which would be of questionable legality).
    [Show full text]
  • Conditions and Challenges Experienced by Human Rights Defenders in Carrying out Their Work
    Conditions and challenges experienced by human rights defenders in carrying out their work: Findings and recommendations of a fact-finding mission to Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories carried out by Forefront and by the World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT) and the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) in their joint programme the Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders Table of contents Paragraphs Executive Summary A. Mission’s rationale and objectives 1-4 B. The delegation’s composition and activities • Composition 5 • Programme 6-12 • Working methods 13-14 C. The environment in which human rights NGOs operate • Upholding human rights in a context of armed conflict and terrorism 15-23 • Freedom of association: Issues relating to human rights NGO’s registration and funding 24-34 • Freedom of expression of human rights defenders 35-37 • Restrictions on freedom of movement affecting the work of human rights NGOs 38-43 • Conditions experienced by the international human rights organisations 44-46 • The NGOs section of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the State of Israel 47-50 D. Main issues that human rights NGOs address • Upholding international humanitarian law in a context of occupation 51-55 • Protecting persons in administrative detention and opposing any forms of torture and ill-treatment 56-61 • Upholding the right to defence and due process of law 62-70 • Opposing house demolitions in the OPTs as collective punishment and ill-treatment 71-72 • Fighting for the dismantlement of Israeli settlements and opposing land-seizure in the OPTs 73-75 E. Specific risks to which human rights defenders are exposed • Physical risks and security hazards faced by human rights defenders in Israel and the OPTs 76-77 • Detention and ill-treatment of human rights defenders: The case of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Bolstering the UN Human Rights Council's Effectiveness
    DISCUSSION PAPER Bolstering the UN Human Rights Council’s Effectiveness Mark P. Lagon Ryan Kaminski January 2017 This publication is part of the International Institutions and Global Governance program and was made possible by the generous support of the Robina Foundation. The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries. Founded in 1921, CFR carries out its mission by maintaining a diverse membership, with special programs to promote interest and develop expertise in the next generation of foreign policy leaders; convening meetings at its headquarters in New York and in Washington, DC, and other cities where senior government officials, members of Congress, global leaders, and promi- nent thinkers come together with CFR members to discuss and debate major international issues; sup- porting a Studies Program that fosters independent research, enabling CFR scholars to produce arti- cles, reports, and books and hold roundtables that analyze foreign policy issues and make concrete policy recommendations; publishing Foreign Affairs, the preeminent journal on international affairs and U.S. foreign policy; sponsoring Independent Task Forces that produce reports with both findings and policy prescriptions on the most important foreign policy topics; and providing up-to-date infor- mation and analysis about world events and American foreign policy on its website, CFR.org. The Council on Foreign Relations takes no institutional positions on policy issues and has no affiliation with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2012
    © Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights – LBI and Research Association A-1010 Vienna, Freyung 6 (Schottenhof), Hof 1, Stiege II T +43/1/42 77-274 20, [email protected], http://bim.lbg.ac.at Vienna, April 2013 INHALTSVERZEICHNIS Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 5 20 Years Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights. 20 Years Committed to Human Rights Research. ..................................................................................................... 7 Human Dignity and Public Security .................................................................................... 9 Human Rights in Development Cooperation and Business / Digital Rights ................................................................................................... 11 European Neighbourhood and Integration Policy ........................................................... 14 Anti-Discrimination | Diversity | Asylum .......................................................................... 17 Women‘s Rights | Children‘s Rights | Trafficking in Human Being ............................... 19 Human Rights Education and Education for Democratic Citizenship .......................... 22 Staff ...................................................................................................................................... 25 Finances .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights and Peace-Keeping Operations Diego Garcia-Sayan
    University of Richmond Law Review Volume 29 | Issue 1 Article 4 1994 Human Rights and Peace-Keeping Operations Diego Garcia-Sayan Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview Part of the Human Rights Law Commons Recommended Citation Diego Garcia-Sayan, Human Rights and Peace-Keeping Operations, 29 U. Rich. L. Rev. 41 (1994). Available at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview/vol29/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Richmond Law Review by an authorized editor of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HUMAN RIGHTS AND PEACE-KEEPING OPERATIONS* Diego Garcta-Saydn** I. INTRODUCTION The purposes of the United Nations, as specified in Article 1 of the United Nations Charter, are to "maintain international peace,"' to promote and encourage "respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion"2 and to "achieve international co-operation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural or humanitarian character."' The changes that have occurred in the world order during the last few years, mainly the end of the Cold War, have revi- talized the original purposes of the United Nations and, as the Secretary-General of the United Nations has said, the need to explore "the place being accorded within the United Nations to the promotion of democracy side by side with the protection of human rights."4 The paralysis in the United Nations decision- making process-represented very explicitly by the continued vetoes in the Security Council (279 during the Cold War era)- seems to be a matter of the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Human Rights Into the Operational Readiness of UN Peacekeepers
    APRIL 2020 Integrating Human Rights into the Operational Readiness of UN Peacekeepers NAMIE DI RAZZA AND JAKE SHERMAN Cover Photo: UN peacekeepers ABOUT THE AUTHORS accompany the director of the human rights division of the UN Mission in South NAMIE DI RAZZA is a Senior Fellow at the International Sudan on a human rights assessment in Peace Institute. Wau, April 19, 2017. Nektarios Markogiannis/UNMISS. Email: [email protected] Disclaimer: The views expressed in this JAKE SHERMAN is the Director of the International Peace paper represent those of the authors Institute’s Brian Urquhart Center for Peace Operations. and not necessarily those of the International Peace Institute. IPI Email: [email protected] welcomes consideration of a wide range of perspectives in the pursuit of a well-informed debate on critical ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS policies and issues in international affairs. IPI owes a debt of gratitude to its many generous donors, whose support makes publications like this one possible. IPI Publications Adam Lupel, Vice President This project was funded by the Government of Finland. Albert Trithart, Editor Meredith Harris, Editorial Intern Suggested Citation: Namie Di Razza and Jake Sherman, “Integrating Human Rights into the Operational Readiness of UN Peacekeepers,” International Peace Institute, April 2020. © by International Peace Institute, 2020 All Rights Reserved www.ipinst.org CONTENTS Abbreviations . iii Executive Summary . v Introduction. 1 Human Rights in UN Peacekeeping. 2 Factoring Human Rights Readiness into Force Generation . 4 The Limitations of Self-Certification. 4 Screening Plus: Beyond Self-Certification. 5 Pre-deployment Visits and Mitigation Measures . 8 Shaping the Human Rights Readiness of Peacekeepers: Training Requirements .
    [Show full text]
  • Erstes Internationales Menschenrechte Symposium 9
    ERSTES INTERNATIONALES MENSCHENRECHTE SYMPOSIUM 9. BIS 12. NOVEMBER 2017 IN DER BEWUSSTSEINSREGION MAUTHAUSEN – GUSEN – ST. GEORGEN EDITORIAL EHRENGÄSTE RAHMENPROGRAMM: Mag.a Muna Duzdar Staatssekretärin für Diversität, Kinderbetreuung / Kinderrechteworkshop Öffentlichen Dienst und Digitalisierung Leitung: Team der Kinderfreunde Mühlviertel. Auch die Jüngeren unter uns beschäftigen sich spielerisch und kreativ mit den Kinderrechten. Bei Landesrätin Birgit Gerstorfer der Anmeldung bitte das Alter der Kinder angeben! Landesrätin für Soziales und Gemeinden Konferenz der Kinder: 18. November 2017 – St. Georgen / Gusen Thomas Christian Erich Wahl Internationaler Tag der Kinderrechte: 20. November 2017 Punkenhofer Aufreiter Bürgermeister Heinz Patzelt, Bürgermeister Bürgermeister St. Georgen/Gusen Amnesty International Mauthausen Langenstein Claudia Heimes Theater für die Menschenrechte Assessori, Vinci, Italien Wolfgang Rohm ERSTES INTERNATIONALES Workshop für Jugendliche Bgm. Mirsad Mahmutagic Aufführung im öffentlichen Raum: MENSCHENRECHTESYMPOSIUM Bürgermeister Maglaj, Bosnien & Herzegowina Freitag, 3. November 2017: DONNERSTAG, 9. NOVEMBER BIS 14:00 Parkplatz Unimarkt Langenstein SONNTAG, 12. NOVEMBER 2017 weitere angefragt 16:00 Genussmarkt St.Georgen/Gusen Samstag, 4. November 2017: Mit Freude dürfen wir das Programm des ersten internatio- 10:00 Donaupark Mauthausen nalen Menschenrechtesymposiums der Bewusstseinsregion Mauthausen – Gusen – St.Georgen präsentieren. Die Menschenrechte sind der Wertekatalog, in dem ein fried- Poetry Slam
    [Show full text]