DOCSLIB.ORG

Integrating Human Rights Into the Operational Readiness of UN Peacekeepers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Integrating Human Rights Into the Operational Readiness of UN Peacekeepers APRIL 2020 Integrating Human Rights into the Operational Readiness of UN Peacekeepers NAMIE DI RAZZA AND JAKE SHERMAN Cover Photo: UN peacekeepers ABOUT THE AUTHORS accompany the director of the human rights division of the UN Mission in South NAMIE DI RAZZA is a Senior Fellow at the International Sudan on a human rights assessment in Peace Institute. Wau, April 19, 2017. Nektarios Markogiannis/UNMISS. Email: [email protected] Disclaimer: The views expressed in this JAKE SHERMAN is the Director of the International Peace paper represent those of the authors Institute’s Brian Urquhart Center for Peace Operations. and not necessarily those of the International Peace Institute. IPI Email: [email protected] welcomes consideration of a wide range of perspectives in the pursuit of a well-informed debate on critical ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS policies and issues in international affairs. IPI owes a debt of gratitude to its many generous donors, whose support makes publications like this one possible. IPI Publications Adam Lupel, Vice President This project was funded by the Government of Finland. Albert Trithart, Editor Meredith Harris, Editorial Intern Suggested Citation: Namie Di Razza and Jake Sherman, “Integrating Human Rights into the Operational Readiness of UN Peacekeepers,” International Peace Institute, April 2020. © by International Peace Institute, 2020 All Rights Reserved www.ipinst.org CONTENTS Abbreviations . iii Executive Summary . v Introduction. 1 Human Rights in UN Peacekeeping. 2 Factoring Human Rights Readiness into Force Generation . 4 The Limitations of Self-Certification. 4 Screening Plus: Beyond Self-Certification. 5 Pre-deployment Visits and Mitigation Measures . 8 Shaping the Human Rights Readiness of Peacekeepers: Training Requirements . 10 Human Rights in Pre-deployment Training: A National Responsibility. 10 Human Rights in In-Mission Training . 12 Gaps in the Delivery of Pre-deployment and In-Mission Training . 12 Conclusion. 13 Prioritizing Human Rights in the Force Generation Process . 14 Strengthening Human Rights Training for Uniformed Peacekeepers . 15 ABBREVIATIONS AAV Assessment and advisory visit AU African Union DPO UN Department of Peace Operations DPPA UN Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs ICRC International Committee of the Red Cross IHL International humanitarian law IHRL International human rights law ITS UN Integrated Training Service OHCHR Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights OMA UN Office of Military Affairs PDV Pre-deployment visit POC Protection of civilians T/PCCs Troop- and police-contributing countries Executive Summary The effectiveness of UN peace operations depends training for UN personnel, whether before deploy- on the “operational readiness” of their personnel, ment, during the in-mission induction, or on an which refers to the knowledge, expertise, training, ongoing basis during deployment. However, the equipment, and mindset needed to carry out quality of pre-deployment trainings varies widely mandated tasks. While the need to improve the among T/PCCs, and in-mission induction operational readiness of peacekeepers has been trainings are usually not well-tailored to specific increasingly recognized over the past few years, the missions. There is a widespread perception that concept of “human rights readiness” has received existing training practices and methodologies are less attention. This refers to the extent to which insufficient and fail to integrate the practical consideration of human rights is integrated into training needs identified on the ground. Moreover, the generation, operational configuration, and pre-deployment training—let alone in-mission evaluation of uniformed personnel. training—is often too late to introduce human rights principles. Many missions have an express mandate to promote and protect human rights, sometimes Both T/PCCs and the UN could take tangible alongside a mandate to protect civilians. Beyond actions in the generation and training of these mandates, all peace operations and all UN peacekeepers to strengthen their human rights personnel are legally obligated to comply with readiness: human rights standards and international humani- tarian and refugee law and to uphold UN human • Force generation: The UN should make human rights principles. While numerous policies and rights performance an integral part of the guidance documents reinforce the centrality of operational readiness of T/PCCs. It should human rights to peacekeeping, the UN has tended better assess human rights concerns and to focus on the compliance of its partners rather human rights readiness as criteria in the than on the preparedness of its own personnel. selection of T/PCCs and request that they align their human rights screening processes with There are two areas where the UN could strengthen UN standards. The UN could also integrate existing processes to ensure the human rights human rights readiness into requirements for readiness of uniformed personnel. The first is in contingent-owned equipment and require the force generation process. Troop- and police- T/PCCs to deploy experts in human rights, the contributing countries (T/PCCs) are requested to protection of civilians, or international law to certify that the personnel they provide have not accompany uniformed personnel. Finally, the committed, or been alleged to have committed, secretary-general should propose the establish- criminal offenses or violations of international ment of a UN human rights–screening entity human rights or humanitarian law. However, this with appropriate resources and capacities. reliance on “self-certification” inherently limits accountability. To overcome this limitation, the • Training: The UN should develop a human UN has used an ad hoc process called “screening rights–specific course for military trainers, as it plus” to address human rights concerns in Sri has for police trainers, and ensure that the new Lanka and Burundi. Although this process is not generic training-of-trainers course adequately used systematically, it has led the UN to take steps addresses human rights and protection issues. to bolster screening across T/PCCs. Nonetheless, The Office of the UN High Commissioner for robust screening remains constrained by limited Human Rights should also expand its capacity capacity and resources, as well as political sensiti - to train peacekeepers, and peacekeeping vities. training centers should make greater use of external human rights experts. Member states The second main area where the UN seeks to should provide additional funding and improve human rights readiness is training. capacity to allow for additional training, and Awareness of international human rights and T/PCCs should ensure that outgoing battalion humanitarian law is a foundational element of leaders share lessons with incoming leaders. Integrating Human Rights into the Operational Readiness of UN Peacekeepers 1 Introduction This paper seeks to define the concept of “human rights readiness” for peacekeepers, which is Following recent reforms aimed at improving the intended to complement “operational readiness” to performance and accountability of UN peace make peace operations more effective and fit-for- operations, both the UN Secretariat and troop- and purpose. In the context of UN peace operations, police-contributing countries (T/PCCs) are “human rights readiness” is the extent to which expected to strengthen the “operational readiness” personnel provided by T/PCCs are prepared and of personnel deployed to the field.1 This requires willing to cooperate with missions’ human rights ensuring that peacekeepers have the requisite components and proactively integrate human knowledge, expertise, training, equipment, and rights into planning and operations, including for mindset to implement their mandate in accordance the implementation of protection of civilians with UN principles, values, standards, and policies. mandates.5 Building on existing UN policy frame - works, standards, and initiatives, it encompasses The operational readiness of uniformed personnel the obligations of these personnel to respect is critical to the effective delivery of mandated tasks international humanitarian and human rights law authorized by Security Council resolutions.2 The when serving in a peace operation. It also includes UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and their obligation under the UN Charter and UN Department of Field Support therefore developed policies to promote and advance human rights in an Operational Readiness Assurance and their work and the support the UN provides to help Performance Improvement Policy, as well as them meet this obligation. related guidelines, in 2015.3 Since that policy, there has been a gradual recognition of the important The human rights readiness of peacekeepers is role of human rights as part of overall performance. ensured by both T/PCCs and the UN, which should For example, as part of the Action for Peacekeeping support and assess that readiness by integrating Initiative’s “Declaration of Shared Commitments,” human rights and humanitarian law into the member states and the UN Secretariat reaffirmed generation, operational configuration, and evalua- that peacekeeping operations make an important tion of uniformed personnel. This includes contribution to protecting civilians and human incorporating this law into policies, standard rights. They also acknowledged the need to operating procedures, and mechanisms that guide “support pre-deployment preparations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • West Bank and Gaza 2020 Human Rights Report
    WEST BANK AND GAZA 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Palestinian Authority basic law provides for an elected president and legislative council. There have been no national elections in the West Bank and Gaza since 2006. President Mahmoud Abbas has remained in office despite the expiration of his four-year term in 2009. The Palestinian Legislative Council has not functioned since 2007, and in 2018 the Palestinian Authority dissolved the Constitutional Court. In September 2019 and again in September, President Abbas called for the Palestinian Authority to organize elections for the Palestinian Legislative Council within six months, but elections had not taken place as of the end of the year. The Palestinian Authority head of government is Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh. President Abbas is also chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization and general commander of the Fatah movement. Six Palestinian Authority security forces agencies operate in parts of the West Bank. Several are under Palestinian Authority Ministry of Interior operational control and follow the prime minister’s guidance. The Palestinian Civil Police have primary responsibility for civil and community policing. The National Security Force conducts gendarmerie-style security operations in circumstances that exceed the capabilities of the civil police. The Military Intelligence Agency handles intelligence and criminal matters involving Palestinian Authority security forces personnel, including accusations of abuse and corruption. The General Intelligence Service is responsible for external intelligence gathering and operations. The Preventive Security Organization is responsible for internal intelligence gathering and investigations related to internal security cases, including political dissent. The Presidential Guard protects facilities and provides dignitary protection.
    [Show full text]
  • The London School of Economics and Political Science Making EU
    The London School of Economics and Political Science Making EU Foreign Policy towards a ‘Pariah’ State: Consensus on Sanctions in EU Foreign Policy towards Myanmar Arthur Minsat A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, June 2012 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorization does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 97,547 words. Statement of use of third party for editorial help I can confirm that my thesis was copy edited for conventions of language, spelling and grammar by Dr. Joe Hoover. 2 Abstract This thesis seeks to explain why the European Union ratcheted up restrictive measures on Myanmar from 1991 until 2010, despite divergent interests of EU member states and the apparent inability of sanctions to quickly achieve the primary objectives of EU policy. This empirical puzzle applies the ‘sanctions paradox’ to the issue of joint action in the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Factsheet: Promoting Freedom of Religion Or Belief Within the United
    UNITED STATES COMMISSION on INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM FACTSHEET October 2020 UN HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM Gayle Manchin Promoting Freedom of Religion or Belief within the United Nations Chair Human Rights System Tony Perkins Vice Chair By Kirsten Lavery, Supervisory Policy Analyst Anurima Bhargava Vice Chair Pursuant to the International Religious Freedom Act (IRFA), the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) monitors freedom of religion or Commissioners belief abroad using international human rights standards, including the Universal Gary Bauer Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the International Covenant on Civil and James W. Carr Political Rights (ICCPR). Within the United Nations (UN) system, there are a variety of charter and treaty-based mechanisms with mandates that address international Frederick A. Davie human rights issues according to the same standards. This factsheet describes Nadine Maenza those mechanisms, with a particular focus on those most relevant to freedom of Johnnie Moore religion or belief. Although these bodies have various imperfections and limitations, Nury Turkel they nevertheless provide opportunities for advocacy by and collaboration among states and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) working to promote religious freedom internationally. Erin D. Singshinsuk Executive Director UN Human Rights Focused Mechanisms Charter-Based Mechanisms: UN charter-based mechanisms are mandated through resolutions of the principal organs of the UN that were established by the UN Charter. USCIRF’s Mission Currently, the charter-based human rights mechanisms are the Human Rights Council (HRC) and its subsidiaries. HRC: The HRC is an inter-governmental body of 47 member states that was To advance international established in 2006 by General Assembly Resolution 60/251 as a subsidiary body to the UN General Assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 June 8, 2020 to Members of The
    June 8, 2020 To Members of the United Nations Human Rights Council Re: Request for the Convening of a Special Session on the Escalating Situation of Police Violence and Repression of Protests in the United States Excellencies, The undersigned family members of victims of police killings and civil society organizations from around the world, call on member states of the UN Human Rights Council to urgently convene a Special Session on the situation of human rights in the United States in order to respond to the unfolding grave human rights crisis borne out of the repression of nationwide protests. The recent protests erupted on May 26 in response to the police murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis, Minnesota, which was only one of a recent string of unlawful killings of unarmed Black people by police and armed white vigilantes. We are deeply concerned about the escalation in violent police responses to largely peaceful protests in the United States, which included the use of rubber bullets, tear gas, pepper spray and in some cases live ammunition, in violation of international standards on the use of force and management of assemblies including recent U.N. Guidance on Less Lethal Weapons. Additionally, we are greatly concerned that rather than using his position to serve as a force for calm and unity, President Trump has chosen to weaponize the tensions through his rhetoric, evidenced by his promise to seize authority from Governors who fail to take the most extreme tactics against protestors and to deploy federal armed forces against protestors (an action which would be of questionable legality).
    [Show full text]
  • Conditions and Challenges Experienced by Human Rights Defenders in Carrying out Their Work
    Conditions and challenges experienced by human rights defenders in carrying out their work: Findings and recommendations of a fact-finding mission to Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories carried out by Forefront and by the World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT) and the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) in their joint programme the Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders Table of contents Paragraphs Executive Summary A. Mission’s rationale and objectives 1-4 B. The delegation’s composition and activities • Composition 5 • Programme 6-12 • Working methods 13-14 C. The environment in which human rights NGOs operate • Upholding human rights in a context of armed conflict and terrorism 15-23 • Freedom of association: Issues relating to human rights NGO’s registration and funding 24-34 • Freedom of expression of human rights defenders 35-37 • Restrictions on freedom of movement affecting the work of human rights NGOs 38-43 • Conditions experienced by the international human rights organisations 44-46 • The NGOs section of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the State of Israel 47-50 D. Main issues that human rights NGOs address • Upholding international humanitarian law in a context of occupation 51-55 • Protecting persons in administrative detention and opposing any forms of torture and ill-treatment 56-61 • Upholding the right to defence and due process of law 62-70 • Opposing house demolitions in the OPTs as collective punishment and ill-treatment 71-72 • Fighting for the dismantlement of Israeli settlements and opposing land-seizure in the OPTs 73-75 E. Specific risks to which human rights defenders are exposed • Physical risks and security hazards faced by human rights defenders in Israel and the OPTs 76-77 • Detention and ill-treatment of human rights defenders: The case of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • International Differences in Support for Human Rights Sam Mcfarland Phd Western Kentucky University, [email protected]
    Societies Without Borders Volume 12 Article 12 Issue 1 Human Rights Attitudes 2017 International Differences in Support for Human Rights Sam McFarland PhD Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/swb Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation McFarland, Sam. 2017. "International Differences in Support for Human Rights." Societies Without Borders 12 (1). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/swb/vol12/iss1/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Cross Disciplinary Publications at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Societies Without Borders by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. McFarland: International Differences in Support for Human Rights International Differences in Support for Human Rights Sam McFarland Western Kentucky University ABSTRACT International differences in support for human rights are reviewed. The first of two sections reviews variations in the strength of ratification of UN human rights treaties, followed by an examination of the commonalities and relative strengths among the five regional human rights systems. This review indicates that internationally the strongest human rights support is found in Europe and the Americas, with weaker support in Africa, followed by still weaker support in the Arab Union and Southeast Asia. The second section reviews variations in responses to public opinion polls on a number of civil and economic rights. A strong coherence in support for different kinds of rights was found, and between a nation’s public support for human rights and the number of UN human rights conventions a nation has ratified.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Watch All Rights Reserved
    HUMAN RIGHTS “That’s When I Realized I Was Nobody” A Climate of Fear for LGBT People in Kazakhstan WATCH “That’s When I Realized I Was Nobody” A Climate of Fear for LGBT People in Kazakhstan Copyright © 2015 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-32637 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org JULY 2015 978-1-6231-32637 “That’s When I Realized I Was Nobody” A Climate of Fear for LGBT People in Kazakhstan Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 4 To the Government of Kazakhstan .............................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Bolstering the UN Human Rights Council's Effectiveness
    DISCUSSION PAPER Bolstering the UN Human Rights Council’s Effectiveness Mark P. Lagon Ryan Kaminski January 2017 This publication is part of the International Institutions and Global Governance program and was made possible by the generous support of the Robina Foundation. The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries. Founded in 1921, CFR carries out its mission by maintaining a diverse membership, with special programs to promote interest and develop expertise in the next generation of foreign policy leaders; convening meetings at its headquarters in New York and in Washington, DC, and other cities where senior government officials, members of Congress, global leaders, and promi- nent thinkers come together with CFR members to discuss and debate major international issues; sup- porting a Studies Program that fosters independent research, enabling CFR scholars to produce arti- cles, reports, and books and hold roundtables that analyze foreign policy issues and make concrete policy recommendations; publishing Foreign Affairs, the preeminent journal on international affairs and U.S. foreign policy; sponsoring Independent Task Forces that produce reports with both findings and policy prescriptions on the most important foreign policy topics; and providing up-to-date infor- mation and analysis about world events and American foreign policy on its website, CFR.org. The Council on Foreign Relations takes no institutional positions on policy issues and has no affiliation with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2012
    © Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights – LBI and Research Association A-1010 Vienna, Freyung 6 (Schottenhof), Hof 1, Stiege II T +43/1/42 77-274 20, [email protected], http://bim.lbg.ac.at Vienna, April 2013 INHALTSVERZEICHNIS Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 5 20 Years Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights. 20 Years Committed to Human Rights Research. ..................................................................................................... 7 Human Dignity and Public Security .................................................................................... 9 Human Rights in Development Cooperation and Business / Digital Rights ................................................................................................... 11 European Neighbourhood and Integration Policy ........................................................... 14 Anti-Discrimination | Diversity | Asylum .......................................................................... 17 Women‘s Rights | Children‘s Rights | Trafficking in Human Being ............................... 19 Human Rights Education and Education for Democratic Citizenship .......................... 22 Staff ...................................................................................................................................... 25 Finances .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights
    Universal Declaration of Human Rights Preamble Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world, Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people, Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law, Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations, Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom, Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in cooperation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms, Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge, Now, therefore, The General Assembly, Proclaims this Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights and Peace-Keeping Operations Diego Garcia-Sayan
    University of Richmond Law Review Volume 29 | Issue 1 Article 4 1994 Human Rights and Peace-Keeping Operations Diego Garcia-Sayan Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview Part of the Human Rights Law Commons Recommended Citation Diego Garcia-Sayan, Human Rights and Peace-Keeping Operations, 29 U. Rich. L. Rev. 41 (1994). Available at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview/vol29/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Richmond Law Review by an authorized editor of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HUMAN RIGHTS AND PEACE-KEEPING OPERATIONS* Diego Garcta-Saydn** I. INTRODUCTION The purposes of the United Nations, as specified in Article 1 of the United Nations Charter, are to "maintain international peace,"' to promote and encourage "respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion"2 and to "achieve international co-operation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural or humanitarian character."' The changes that have occurred in the world order during the last few years, mainly the end of the Cold War, have revi- talized the original purposes of the United Nations and, as the Secretary-General of the United Nations has said, the need to explore "the place being accorded within the United Nations to the promotion of democracy side by side with the protection of human rights."4 The paralysis in the United Nations decision- making process-represented very explicitly by the continued vetoes in the Security Council (279 during the Cold War era)- seems to be a matter of the past.
    [Show full text]
  • European Institutions Office Brussels, 25 April 2012
    Š tefan Füle Commissioner for Enlargement and European Neighbourhood Policy European Commission European Institutions Office Brussels, 25 April 2012 Our Ref: B 1196 Dear Commissioner Füle, EC MUST BE UNEQUIVOCAL ON UNLAWFULNESS OF TOMORROW’S FORCED EVICTIONS IN BELGRADE On Friday 20 April Amnesty International asked you to call on the city of Belgrade not to carry out evictions of Roma settlements planned for this week until internationally-required procedures had been followed. The forced eviction of more than 1,000 Roma from the same settlement at Belvil will take place tomorrow morning, Thursday 26 April. We urge the Commission urgently and immediately to call on the Belgrade city authorities to postpone this eviction until a proper process of consultation with Belvil residents has taken place, in accordance with international human rights standards. The Commission must be unequivocal in its engagement with the city authorities that if the eviction proceeds tomorrow, it will be a forced eviction which violates international and regional standards to which Serbia is party. We consider that the measures by means of which this eviction has been organised fail to meet international standards on the conduct of lawful evictions. These include that need for evictions only to take place where and when they are absolutely necessary, following appropriate consultations and that affected people have been served with adequate and reasonable prior notice, and been granted access to legal remedies to challenge the eviction. But in this case, the affected residents have not been told the reason for the eviction, nor have any other of the mentioned requirements been met.
    [Show full text]