The Ukrainian Weekly, 2018
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Resilient Ukraine Resilient
Resilient Ukraine: Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Russian from Society Ukraine: Safeguarding Resilient Research Paper Mathieu Boulègue and Orysia Lutsevych Ukraine Forum | June 2020 Resilient Ukraine Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Mathieu Boulègue and OrysiaLutsevych Chatham House Contents Summary 2 1 Introduction 3 2 The Impact of the Armed Conflict 13 3 Creating Resilience Dividends: Case Studies 27 4 Recommendations 33 5 Conclusion 37 About the Authors 38 Acknowledgments 39 1 | Chatham House Resilient Ukraine: Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Summary • Despite military conflict and an increasingly adversarial relationship with Russia, Ukraine has largely maintained its democratic reforms thanks to its resilience and determination to decide its own future. The country is gradually developing the capacity of its state institutions and civil society to address the political and social consequences of Russian aggression. • Russia’s three main levers of influence in Ukraine include the ongoing armed conflict, corruption, and the poor quality of the political sphere. The Kremlin seeks to exploit these vulnerabilities to promote polarization and encourage a clash between Ukraine’s citizens and its governing elite by taking military action, manipulating the corruption narrative, supporting pro-Russia parties, and fuelling religious tensions through the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC). • The ramifications of the military operation in Donbas reverberate strongly across the country and domestic politics. The most prominent spillover effects include the circulation of firearms and the weakened capacity of authorities to reintegrate internally displaced people (IDPs) and war veterans. • With no clear way to end the armed conflict, there is a growing risk of societal polarization. This could have negative consequences for any prospective peace agreement. -
Whose Is Crimea?
#4 (110) April 2017 Why the ORDiLO blockade Transformations in Ukraine’s parties: What protests in Belarus say became official policy Petro Poroshenko Bloc and Samopomich about social sentiments WHOSE IS CRIMEA? WWW.UKRAINIANWEEK.COM Featuring selected content from The Economist FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION CONTENTS | 3 BRIEFING FOCUS 5 Aggressive awakening: 30 The key to Crimea: The scale and reasons of conflict The autonomy of the indigenous escalation in Eastern Ukraine people of Crimea in the framework of Ukraine’s territorial integrity POLITICS 7 Courts, sanctions and the blockade: 34 Chase down and chase out: How the A consolidated strategy to hold Russia policy of quiet expulsion of Crimean accountable for its armed aggression Tatars from the peninsula works against Ukraine SOCIETY 12 Blockade vs Minsk talks: 36 From trenches to business: What pushed President Poroshenko Entrepreneurship as therapy for ATO to make the blockade veterans of the Donbas into official policy NEIGHBOURS 14 What about your money? 38 Constrained? Is America’s system of What is wrong with new NGO checks and balances working? income declaration amendments 42 A change of mind: 16 Closing for repairs? An overhaul ECFR Poland’s Piotr Buras on three of the Petro Poroshenko Bloc – new paradigms of EU integration reasons and goals 44 Unfreedom day: Why the breaking up 18 The growing pains of self-reliance: of Minsk protest rallies does not dent How Samopomich survives in the role opposition to Alexander Lukashenka of the democratic opposition in Belarus society 20 Seven -
The Ukrainian Weekly, 2020
Part 3 of THE YEAR IN REVIEW pages 7-15 THEPublished U by theKRAINIAN Ukrainian National Association, Inc., celebrating W its 125th anniversaryEEKLY Vol. LXXXVIII No. 5 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2020 $2.00 Zelenskyy faces challenges of history Oleh Sentsov: The nail that will not bend and diplomacy in Israel and Poland memoration on such terms and told Israeli media that Mr. Putin was spreading lies to conceal the Soviet Union’s responsibility for the war along with that of Nazi Germany. In this highly tricky situation, Mr. Zelenskyy bided his time and did not con- firm whether he would be going to Jerusalem and Warsaw until the last min- ute. While still preoccupied with the after- math of a Ukrainian airliner’s downing in Tehran and the return of the bodies, President Zelenskyy nevertheless made his line known. The Times of Israel reported on January 19, after interviewing him in Kyiv, and on the day he announced he would be going to Israel: “He speaks at length about the Holodomor, the Soviet- imposed deliberate famine of 1932-1933, Olena Blyednova which killed millions, and with great Oleh Sentsov during his presentation on January 25 in New York. The discussion was respect for the victims of the Holocaust – moderated by Razom volunteer Maria Genkin. and the need to bring a belated, honest his- torical account of these events into the by Irene Jarosewich in Switzerland – that he does not consider open. He acknowledges but says less on the himself to be, foremost, a Russian political Presidential Office of Ukraine issue of Ukrainians’ participation in NEW YORK – Ukrainian film director prisoner. -
Moderators' Biographies
MODERATORS’ BIOGRAPHIES Col. ROMAN ANDRYCZYK (U. S. Army – Retired) was born in Ukraine during World War II. As a small child he and his family were forced to flee Ukraine for Germany. Roman attended schools in Belgium, Argentina and the USA. He graduated from the Pennsylvania State University in 1964 earning a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering. Upon graduation he was commissioned an officer in the U.S. Army through the ROTC program at Penn State. Subsequently he earned a Master’s Degree in Engineering also at Penn State. During his 26 –year military career he graduated from the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College in 1978 and the U.S. Army War College in 1984. He was stationed in West Germany with the 16th Signal Battalion and took part in operations in Granada in 1983, Haiti and other deployments. Roman was also assigned to J6 (Political Military) at the Pentagon and took part in NATO exercises in Germany at High Command levels. He was an instructor of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College subsequently becoming the director of the College in Philadelphia. Roman is a lifetime member of the ROA (Reserve Officers Association). In civilian life, Roman was employed by the General Electric Aerospace Division, RCA, Lockheed Martin and L-3 Communications. He travelled and worked extensively in England, Germany, Italy and Japan. In the Aerospace field he worked on the Mars Lander, GPS, High Frequency Commercial Television Communication Satellite, Space Lab and multiple other programs as an Engineering Project Manager -
SECOND UKRAINIAN WOMEN's CONGRESS AGENDA 7-8 December 2018 Kyiv, 1 Naberezhno-Khreshchatytska Street, Fairmont Grand Hotel DA
SECOND UKRAINIAN WOMEN’S CONGRESS AGENDA 7-8 December 2018 Kyiv, 1 Naberezhno-Khreshchatytska Street, Fairmont Grand Hotel DAY I 08:30 – 09:45 Registration of participants - welcome coffee 09:45 – 10:00 Opening. Welcome address Discussion platform 1: Ukrainian and global trends with regard to the equal rights and 10:00 – 11:30 opportunities of women and men Taking stock of the progress towards gender equality in Ukraine and identify further steps to ensure equal rights and opportunities of women and men. Discussing the concept of gender mainstreaming from a global perspective and its influence on the politics of other countries. Discussing a possibility of political evolution in Ukraine in the context of higher representation of women in politics and in the decision-making process. MODERATOR: Ms. Olena Kondratiuk, Member of the Parliament of Ukraine, Co-chair of the «Equal Opportunities» Caucus in the Parliament of Ukraine Speakers of the discussion platform: Ms. Iryna Herashchenko, First Deputy Speaker of the Parliament of Ukraine, President's Commissioner for Peaceful Situation Resolution in Donetsk and Luhansk regions Ms. Rasa Juknevičienė, Vice President of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly Mr. Hennadii Zubko, Vice Prime Minister of Ukraine, Minister of Regional Development, Construction, Housing and Communal Services of Ukraine Ms. Laura Cooper, United States Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Russia, Ukraine, Eurasia (tbc) Ms. Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Member of the European Parliament (EPP Group), Active in the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality, the Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Association Committee, the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Ms. -
14 Activating the 'Human Factor': Do the Roots of Neoliberal
FORUM FOR ANTHROPOLOGY AND CULTURE, 2018, NO 14 ACTIVATING THE ‘HUMAN FACTOR’: DO THE ROOTS From Fieldwork WrittenFrom to Text OF NEOLIBERAL SUBJECTIVITY LIE IN THE ‘STAGNATION’? Forum Sergei Alymov № 14 2018 From Fieldwork to Written Text Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences for Anthropology and Culture and Culture Anthropology for Forum 32a Leninskiy Av., Moscow, Russia Expeditions Reviews Forum Articles Personalia [email protected] 2018 №14 A b s t r a c t: This article examines the ideas of Soviet philosophers and economists of the 1970s and 80s about personality / Soviet man. The author analyses the views of official philosophers of the conservative and liberal camps on the nature of developed socialism. The reformers (A. P. Butenko, A. S. Tsipko) stressed the growth of the significance of the individual in a modern society and economy, connecting the ‘humanisation’ of society with a growth in consumption and the development of the personality. The orthodox (R. I. Kosolapov) cited the definition of labour as the native essence of man given by Marx. In creating the model of Soviet man, they orientated themselves on the image of the industrial worker (G. L. Smirnov). In their opinion his activity was founded on the coincidence of the interests of the personality and society. This concept was attacked by the criticism that it took no account of ‘human nature’. The reformers pointed to the ‘selfish interests of the person’ and activity connected with them as a biological given. The ‘tough’ peasant often figured as a symbol of this. ‘Activating the human factor’ became a topical point on the reformers’ agenda. -
Ukraine-Moldova: Competition, Cooperation and Interdependence
PERSPECTIVE KyivПредставництво в Україні та Білорусі n UKRAINE-MOLDOVA: COMPETITION, COOPERATION AND INTERDEPENDENCE SERGIY GERASYMCHUK/ANGELA GRAMADA n In the recent years the relationships of Ukraine and Moldova had positive dynamics, which nevertheless is clouded with certain problems, which can be figuratively marked with four “E”s: economy, energy, ecology, and ethnic minorities. The solution of these problems is possible, provided the intergovernmental dialogue continues and the international structures, foremost the EU, further support and mediate this process. n Mutual interests of Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova in stability and security in the region became even more relevant and both sides support concordant policy towards Transnistrian settlement, as well as principles of borders inviolability and territorial integrity of Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova. However, further progress in this sphere largely depends on the results of the 2018 parliamentary elections in Moldova. n The main problem of the bilateral relationships remains unpredictability and mutual lack of trust. This problem can be solved, provided there is political will of both sides, as well as mediatory efforts of active civil society, which remains the main driver for democratization of both countries. n SERGIY GERASYMCHUK/ANGELA GRAMADA | UKRAINE-MOLDOVA: COMPETITION, COOPERATION AND INTERDEPENDENCE n Kyiv n Contents Abstract .................................................................. 4 Ukraine and Moldova – newly emerging challenges and opportunities in bilateral relations . 5 Foreword. 5 Economy, energy - the importance of an efficient commercial partnership after 2014 (market and consumers) ......................................... 5 Environmental problems - hydropower plants on Dniester - common environmental issue ....................................................... 7 An ethnic minority – Ukrainians in Moldova – how difficult is to be a minority representative ............................................................ -
Putin's Popularity
The Popularity of Russian Presidents Why did Boris Yeltsin’s approval rating fall drastically, whereas Vladimir Putin’s surged during his first months and remained at unprecedented heights throughout his presidency? Analyzing time series of presidential approval since 1993, I find that the popularity of each closely followed perceptions of economic performance, which, in turn, reflected objective economic indicators. Perceptions of the political situation contributed, but these were caused in part by economic perceptions. Most other factors invoked by commentators had only marginal, temporary effects. Simulations suggest the sudden improvement in the Russian economy in 1999 would have carried Putin—or another Kremlin candidate—to victory in the 2000 election without any war in Chechnya or terrorist bombings. Had Yeltsin presided over Putin’s economy, simulations suggest he would have been similarly popular. Had Putin been president in the 1990s, his rating would have sunk even lower than Yeltsin’s. Daniel Treisman Department of Political Science University of California, Los Angeles 4289 Bunche Hall Los Angeles California 90095 [email protected] 12 May 2008 Preliminary draft, comments welcome. I thank Tim Frye, Scott Gehlbach, Arnold Harberger, Brian Richter, Richard Rose, and Jeff Timmons for comments. 1 Introduction Since his appointment as prime minister in August 1999, Vladimir Putin has become by far the most popular politician in Russia’s recent history. During his first three months, the share of respondents saying that on the whole they approved of Putin’s performance jumped from 31 to 78 percent. This astronomical rating followed him when, in January 2000, he became acting president. -
Contents and Abstracts
Экономическая социология. Т. 14. № 4. Сентябрь 2013 www.ecsoc.hse.ru Contents and Abstracts Editor’s Foreword (Vadim Radaev)5 Tatyana I. Zaslavskaya (9 September 1927 — 23 August 2013) �����������������������������������������������������������������������8 Interviews The Russian Professional Sociological Society Needs More Independent Experts Igor Zadorin interviewed by Andrey Yakovlev ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������10 Abstract At the end of 2012 and early 2013, the Higher School of Economics and the Association of Russian Economic Think Tanks (ARETT) conducted a project devoted to modern conditions and trends in the development of think-tanks as a significant segment of independent research in Russia and their roles in the formation of economic policy. An interview with the President of the New Economic Association, Victor Polterovich, carried out within the framework of this project, can be found in the previous volume of Economic Sociology (2013. Vol. 14. No. 3). In-depth interviews with the heads of economic think-tanks and independent economic experts were enriched by several talks with the heads of centres for sociological research, including a conservation with Igor Zadorin, Director General of ZIRCON Research Group. Economic Sociology’s editorial staff is much obliged to Igor Zadorin and Andrey Yakovlev (as team leader of the HSE-ARETT project) for the opportunity to publish the full text of this interview. Keywords: expert community; independent expertise; think tanks; sociological research. New Texts Natalia Firsova Predictors of Innovative Consumption Practices: Internet Shopping Adoption in Russian Households ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������27 Abstract This paper is aimed at answering the question of why some people engage in innovative consumption practices earlier than others, through analysis of Internet shopping predictors. -
The Evolving Relationship Between Youth and the State in Putin's Russia
University of Mississippi eGrove Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors Theses Honors College) Spring 5-2-2021 From Ideological Resource to Financial Asset: The Evolving Relationship Between Youth and the State in Putin's Russia Eleanor Schmid University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis Part of the International Relations Commons, Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons, and the Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies Commons Recommended Citation Schmid, Eleanor, "From Ideological Resource to Financial Asset: The Evolving Relationship Between Youth and the State in Putin's Russia" (2021). Honors Theses. 1929. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis/1929 This Undergraduate Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College) at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FROM IDEOLOGICAL RESOURCE TO FINANCIAL ASSET: THE EVOLVING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN YOUTH AND THE STATE IN PUTIN’S RUSSIA ã 2021 By Eleanor J. Schmid A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for completion Of the Bachelor of Arts degree in International Studies Croft Institute for International Studies Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College The University of Mississippi University, Mississippi May 2021 Approved: ____________________________ Advisor: Dr. Joshua First ____________________________ Reader: Dr. Ana Velitchkova ____________________________ Reader: Prof. Ashleen Williams i ã 2021 Eleanor J. Schmid ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT This thesis identifies four periods of Russian youth policy, and discusses how President Vladimir Putin's approach to youth and youth issues is markedly different than that of previous heads of state, and that it has evolved even within his tenure. -
Rose-Roth Seminar Programme
ROSE-ROTH 052 SEM 17 E rev. 3 Original: English NATO Parliamentary Assembly 95th Rose-Roth Seminar In Cooperation with the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Towards a Secure and Stable Ukraine and Black Sea Region Kyiv, Ukraine 3-5 July 2017 DRAFT PROGRAMME #SEMKYIV Updated 21 June 2017 052 SEM 17 E rev. 3 Sunday 2 July ARRIVAL OF PARTICIPANTS ACCOMMODATION FAIRMONT GRAND HOTEL KYIV Kyiv, Ukraine 04070 Tel: + 380 44 322 8888 SEMINAR VENUE BALLROOM, FAIRMONT GRAND HOTEL KYIV Evening Free Monday 3 July REGISTRATION 8:00-8:50 Registration of participants 8:50 Seating of participants OPENING SESSION Moderator: Iryna FRIZ, Head of the Ukrainian Delegation to the NATO PA and Member of the Ukraine-NATO Interparliamentary Council (UNIC) 9:00-9:05 Opening remarks by Andriy PARUBIY, Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine 9:05-9:10 Introduction by Paolo ALLI, President of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly 9:10-9:15 Christoph SPÄTI, Chargé d’affaires a.i. of Switzerland to Ukraine 9:15-9:30 Address by Ivanna KLYMPUSH-TSYNTSADZE, Vice Prime Minister of Ukraine for European and Euro-Atlantic Integration 9:30-10:00 Discussion 10:00-10:20 Keynote presentation by Alexander VERSHBOW, Ambassador (ret.), Distinguished Fellow, The Atlantic Council of the United States, and former Deputy Secretary General of NATO 10:20-11:15 Discussion 11:15-11:30 Coffee break SESSION I RUSSIA, NATO AND THE BLACK SEA REGION Moderator: Paolo ALLI (Italy), President of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly 2 052 SEM 17 E rev. 3 11:30-11:40 Pavel FELGENHAUER, Independent, Moscow-based Defence -
11/26 Reading Assignment. Russia As a Case Study of the Impact of Political Culture on Democratization
11/26 Reading Assignment. Russia as a case study of the impact of political culture on democratization. 1. What's the difference between "mental software" and "ideology"? The features of Soviet Man according to Yuri Levada, a sociologist, is relevant. 2. When the Communist regime collapsed in 1991 there was an expectation, both in the West and in Russia, that the country would embrace Western values and join the civilized world. What was not taken into account in that expectation? 3. How did Boris Yeltsin's firing on parliament in 1993 mark a turning point? Turning away from what and towards what? 4. What Yuri Levada's polling shows (see graph)? 5. The two factors that made Putin popular. 6. The elements of Putin's strategy for consolidating his power: a. his response to the oligarchs and the costs of 1990s-era freedom; b. his understanding of the longstanding nexus between property and political power; c. the conistency, yet different means, of monetizing privilege from Soviet era to the present d. his reinforcement of the "fortress mentality." e. Instructive examples/details: Mikhail Khodorkovsky and Yukos oil company. One in six businessmen in Russia. Yegor Gaidar's 1994 warning. "The bureaucracy's main resource is participation in the rent- distribution chain" (rent seeking). Examples of the "fortress mentality" _____________________________________________________ Russia The long life of Homo sovieticus This week’s elections and upheavals in Russia show how hard it is, 20 years after the system collapsed, for the country to put away its Soviet past Dec 10th 2011 | MOSCOW |From the print edition of The Economist TWENTY years to the month since the Soviet Union fell apart, crowds of angry young people have taken to the streets of Moscow, protesting against the ruling United Russia Party (“the party of crooks and thieves”) and chanting “Russia without Putin!” Hundreds have been detained, and the army has been brought into the centre of Moscow “to provide security”.