DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Evaluation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Evaluation Report Final Evaluation Report Final Evaluation Report Evaluation of UNICEF’s response to the Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Needs in Jordan as a result of the Syrian refugee crisis (July 2012 to July 2017) PREPARED BY INTERNATIONAL SOLUTIONS GROUP An IMC Worldwide Company PREPARED FOR UNICEF Jordan 16 April 2019 Evaluation Timeframe This evaluation covers UNICEF’s WASH programme activities between July 2012 and July 2017. The evaluation was conducted between November 2017 and September 2018. Data collection activities took place during July and August 2018. Geographic Scope This evaluation covers UNICEF Jordan WASH activities in the four camps of Za’atari, Azraq, Cyber City (closed in September 2016) and King Abdallah Park, as well as Rukban and Hadalat (abandoned in September 2017) at the Syrian/Jordanian border. Although there are Syrian refugees registered in all 12 Governorates of Jordan, the evaluation focused on the refugees registered in Zarqa, Irbid, Mafraq and Amman Governorates, which represent 90 percent of registered refugees. Organizations and Consultants conducting the evaluation This evaluation was conducted and led by International Solutions Group, a division of IMC Worldwide, and its partner, the Interdisciplinary Research Consultants, a research firm based in Amman, Jordan. UNICEF Jordan was the evaluation’s commissioning organization. 1 Table of Contents THE WASH PROGRAMME AND CONTEXT ...........................................................................6 DESCRIPTION OF THE WASH PROGRAMME ..................................................................................6 PROGRAMME HISTORY ..................................................................................................................... 6 WASH PROGRAMME PURPOSE, COMPONENTS, AND MANAGEMENT ........................................................ 8 WASH PROGRAMME LOGIC MODEL AND RESULTS FRAMEWORK ............................................................. 9 PROGRAMME CONTEXT......................................................................................................... 12 MANAGING AN INFLUX OF REFUGEES FROM A RELATIVELY WATER-SUFFICIENT AREA .................................... 12 PRE-EXISTING POLITICAL ATTITUDES TOWARD REFUGEES ........................................................................ 13 LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK OF THE WASH SECTOR IN JORDAN ............................................ 13 ECONOMIC TENSION ...................................................................................................................... 13 FUNDING ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................................ 14 DESCRIPTION OF THE EVALUATION ................................................................................. 15 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE ...................................................................................................... 15 SCOPE .............................................................................................................................. 15 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY......................................................................................... 15 DESK REVIEW ..................................................................................................................... 15 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS....................................................................................................... 16 PRIMARY RESEARCH: QUALITATIVE DATA COLLECTION METHODS AND SAMPLING ................................ 16 COVERAGE IN INTERVIEWS AND FOCUS GROUPS .................................................................................. 16 RAPID ASSESSMENTS AND USER INTERVIEWS ...................................................................................... 17 WASH MESSAGING AND PRACTICES ................................................................................................ 17 PARTNER INTERVIEWS .................................................................................................................... 17 DUTY BEARERS AND STAFF .............................................................................................................. 17 STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS.............................................................................................................. 17 ANALYSIS METHOD........................................................................................................................ 17 LIMITATIONS TO THE EVALUATION............................................................................................ 18 ETHICAL PRINCIPLES IN CONDUCTING THE EVALUATION ................................................................. 18 FINDINGS ....................................................................................................................... 19 RELEVANCE ........................................................................................................................ 19 EVALUATION QUESTION 1 ............................................................................................................... 19 EVALUATION QUESTION 2 ............................................................................................................... 26 EVALUATION QUESTION 3 ............................................................................................................... 27 EFFECTIVENESS ................................................................................................................... 29 EVALUATION QUESTION 4 ............................................................................................................... 29 EVALUATION QUESTION 5 ............................................................................................................... 53 EFFICIENCY ........................................................................................................................ 63 EVALUATION QUESTIONS 6 AND 7 .................................................................................................... 63 EVALUATION QUESTION 8 ............................................................................................................... 69 EVALUATION QUESTION 9 ............................................................................................................... 70 EVALUATION QUESTION 10 ............................................................................................................. 72 SUSTAINABILITY .................................................................................................................. 72 EVALUATION QUESTION 11 ............................................................................................................. 72 EVALUATION QUESTION 12 ............................................................................................................. 74 EVALUATION QUESTION 13 ............................................................................................................. 74 EVALUATION QUESTION 14 ............................................................................................................. 75 EVALUATION QUESTION 15 ............................................................................................................. 75 EVALUATION QUESTION 16 ............................................................................................................. 76 1 COVERAGE ......................................................................................................................... 77 EVALUATION QUESTION 17 ............................................................................................................. 77 EVALUATION QUESTION 18 ............................................................................................................. 79 COORDINATION .................................................................................................................. 79 EVALUATION QUESTION 19 ............................................................................................................. 79 EVALUATION QUESTION 20 ............................................................................................................. 80 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................ 80 LESSONS LEARNED AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................ 84 LESSONS ........................................................................................................................... 84 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................ 86 WORKS CITED ................................................................................................................. 89 ANNEX A: EVALUATION TERMS OF REFERENCE................................................................ 92 ANNEX B: ANONYMIZED LIST OF INTERVIEWS ............................................................... 104 ANNEX C: LIST OF SITES VISITED .................................................................................... 105 ANNEX D: DOCUMENTS CONSULTED ............................................................................. 106 ANNEX E: DATA COLLECTION TOOLS ............................................................................. 112 ANNEX F: TEAM DESCRIPTION....................................................................................... 119 ANNEX G: EVALUATION MATRIX
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Access Resource
    The State of Justice Syria 2020 The State of Justice Syria 2020 Syria Justice and Accountability Centre (SJAC) March 2020 About the Syria Justice and Accountability Centre The Syria Justice and Accountability Centre (SJAC) strives to prevent impunity, promote redress, and facilitate principled reform. SJAC works to ensure that human rights violations in Syria are comprehensively documented and preserved for use in transitional justice and peace-building. SJAC collects documentation of violations from all available sources, stores it in a secure database, catalogues it according to human rights standards, and analyzes it using legal expertise and big data methodologies. SJAC also supports documenters inside Syria, providing them with resources and technical guidance, and coordinates with other actors working toward similar aims: a Syria defined by justice, respect for human rights, and rule of law. Learn more at SyriaAccountability.org The State of Justice in Syria, 2020 March 2020, Washington, D.C. Material from this publication may be reproduced for teach- ing or other non-commercial purposes, with appropriate attribution. No part of it may be reproduced in any form for commercial purposes without the prior express permission of the copyright holders. Cover Photo — A family flees from ongoing violence in Idlib, Northwest Syria. (C) Lens Young Dimashqi TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Introduction 4 Major Violations 7 Targeting of Hospitals and Schools 8 Detainees and Missing Persons 8 Violations in Reconciled Areas 9 Property Rights
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater-Based Agriculture in Arid Land : the Case of Azraq Basin
    Groundwater-Based Agriculture in Arid Land: The case of Azraq Basin, Jordan of Azraq in Arid Land: The case Agriculture Groundwater-Based Majd Al Naber Groundwater-Based Agriculture in Arid Land: The case of Azraq Basin, Jordan Majd Al Naber Propositions: 1. Indirect regulatory measures are more efficient than direct measures in controlling the use of groundwater resources. (this thesis) 2. Decreasing the accessibility to production factors constrains, but does not fully control, groundwater-based agriculture expansion. (this thesis) 3. Remote sensing technology should be used in daily practice to monitor environmental changes. 4. Irreversible changes are more common than reversible ones in cases of over exploitation of natural resources. 5. A doctorate title is not the achievement of one's life, but a stepping-stone to one's future. 6. Positivity is required to deal with the long Ph.D. journey. Propositions belonging to the thesis, entitled Groundwater-Based Agriculture in Arid Land: The Case of Azraq Basin, Jordan Majd Al Naber Wageningen, 10 April 2018 Groundwater-Based Agriculture in Arid Land: The Case of Azraq Basin, Jordan Majd Al Naber Thesis committee Promotors Prof. Dr J. Wallinga Professor of Soil and Landscape Wageningen University & Research Co-promotor Dr F. Molle Senior Researcher, G-Eau Research Unit Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier, France Dr Ir J. J. Stoorvogel Associate Professor, Soil Geography and Landscape Wageningen University & Research Other members Prof. Dr Ir P.J.G.J. Hellegers, Wageningen University & Research Prof. Dr Olivier Petit, Université d'Artois, France Prof. Dr Ir P. van der Zaag, IHE Delft University Dr Ir J.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue Brief Syria
    ISSUE BRIEF - SYRIA May 2020 Advocacy Durable Solutions / Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) After almost nine years of conflict in Syria, new displacements(1) continue to substantially surpass returns. Before the 2019 escalations in both the north- Facts & Figures west and north-east of Syria, more than 6 million Syrian people were internally displaced,(2) many of The living conditions in Syria are dire. In the latest them more than once. Syria’s north-east, for instance, Humanitarian Needs Overview, based on data already hosted 710,000 internally displaced people from before the outbreak of COVID-19, the UN from other phases of the conflict(3) when the October estimated that: 9th military incursion forced 200,000 people(4) to move.(5) Moreover, from April 2019 the north-west of ■ 11,7 million people are in need of humanitarian Syria saw intensified aerial attacks leading to almost 1,5 million new displacements by the end of the assistance, with 5 million in acute need; (6) year. Overall more than half of the population of Syria ■ 11,5 million people are at risk of explosive is displaced, either internally or in Syria’s neighbouring hazards;(1) countries, where there are more than 5,5 million Syrian refugees.(7) ■ 6,5 million people are food insecure, and there was a 100 percent increase in acute malnutrition The possible ‘durable solutions’ for refugees are among pregnant and lactating women from 2017 three-fold: 1/ voluntary repatriation (return to Syria); to 2018; 2/ local integration (in the country of first asylum); and 3/ resettlement (to a third country).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter IV: the Implications of the Crisis on Host Communities in Irbid
    Chapter IV The Implications of the Crisis on Host Communities in Irbid and Mafraq – A Socio-Economic Perspective With the beginning of the first quarter of 2011, Syrian refugees poured into Jordan, fleeing the instability of their country in the wake of the Arab Spring. Throughout the two years that followed, their numbers doubled and had a clear impact on the bor- dering governorates, namely Mafraq and Irbid, which share a border with Syria ex- tending some 375 kilometers and which host the largest portion of refugees. Official statistics estimated that at the end of 2013 there were around 600,000 refugees, of whom 170,881 and 124,624 were hosted by the local communities of Mafraq and Ir- bid, respectively. This means that the two governorates are hosting around half of the UNHCR-registered refugees in Jordan. The accompanying official financial burden on Jordan, as estimated by some inter- national studies, stood at around US$2.1 billion in 2013 and is expected to hit US$3.2 billion in 2014. This chapter discusses the socio-economic impact of Syrian refugees on the host communities in both governorates. Relevant data has been derived from those studies conducted for the same purpose, in addition to field visits conducted by the research team and interviews conducted with those in charge, local community members and some refugees in these two governorates. 1. Overview of Mafraq and Irbid Governorates It is relevant to give a brief account of the administrative structure, demographics and financial conditions of the two governorates. Mafraq Governorate Mafraq governorate is situated in the north-eastern part of the Kingdom and it borders Iraq (east and north), Syria (north) and Saudi Arabia (south and east).
    [Show full text]
  • Syria Crisis Countries
    Issa - Syria Aleppo. Crisis 2016 Humanitarian Results ©UNICEF/ Syria 2016/ Aleppo/ Khudr Al Khudr Aleppo/ 2016/ Syria ©UNICEF/ Following intense fighting in east Aleppo, a UNICEF UNICEF a Aleppo, east in fighting intense Following supported mobile nutrition team screens children Jibreen, in malnutrition for ANNUAL 2016: SYRIA, JORDAN, LEBANON, IRAQ, TURKEY AND EGYPT SITUATION IN NUMBERS Highlights In Syria In 2016, there were verified reports of over 2,300 grave violations 5,800,000 against children by armed forces and groups throughout Syria. Of # of children affected these, killing and maiming of children and recruitment and use of children were the most prevalent violations. The actual numbers are 13,500,000 likely to be much higher. # of people affected (HNO, 2017) UNICEF has supported the coordination of the No Lost Generation across the Syria crisis countries. The scale up of education support by Outside Syria sector partners inside Syria has contributed to a decrease in the number of out-of-school children from 2.12 million (40%) in 2014/15 to 1.75 million 2,308,897 (32%) in 2015/16. UNICEF and partners reached over 1 million children with # of registered Syria refugee children structured psychosocial support, and expanded programming for adolescents and youth, including social cohesion and life skills. 4,860,897 # of registered Syrian refugees UNICEF has scaled up cash based programming across the Syria crisis (UNHCR, 5 January 2017) countries in 2016, including providing 12,963 Syrian teachers with incentives in Turkey, and supporting over 21,000 vulnerable households in Jordan, Iraq and Syria with regular cash to support their basic needs.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Capital Projects for the Years 2019 - 2021 ( in Jds ) Chapter Estimated Indicative Indicative Status NO
    List of Capital Projects for the Years 2019 - 2021 ( In JDs ) Chapter Estimated Indicative Indicative Status NO. Project 2019 2020 2021 0301 Prime Ministry 13,625,000 9,875,000 8,870,000 1 Supporting Radio and Television Corporation Projects Continuous 8,515,000 7,650,000 7,250,000 2 Support the Royal Film Commission projects Continuous 3,500,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 3 Media and Communication Continuous 300,000 300,000 300,000 4 Developing model service centers (middle/nourth/south) New 205,000 90,000 70,000 5 Develop service centers affiliated with the government departments as per New 475,000 415,000 50,000 priorities 6 Implementing service recipients satisfaction surveys (mystery shopper) New 200,000 200,000 100,000 7 Training and enabling front offices personnel New 20,000 40,000 20,000 8 Maintaining, sustaining and developing New 100,000 80,000 40,000 9 Enhancing governance practice in the publuc sector New 10,000 20,000 10,000 10 Optimizing the government structure and optimal benefiting of human New 300,000 70,000 20,000 resources 11 Institutionalization of optimal organization and impact measurement in the New 0 10,000 10,000 public sector 0601 Civil Service Bureau 485,000 445,000 395,000 12 Completing the Human Resources Administration Information System Committed 275,000 275,000 250,000 Project/ Stage 2 13 Ideal Employee Award Continuous 15,000 15,000 15,000 14 Automation and E-services Committed 160,000 125,000 100,000 15 Building a system for receiving job applications for higher category and Continuous 15,000 10,000 10,000 administrative jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Suggested Format of Humanitarian Country
    Year 2020 Ref. Ares(2020)2921181 - 05/06/2020 Version 02– 26/05/2020 HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP) SYRIA REGIONAL CRISIS The full implementation of this version of the HIP is conditional upon the necessary appropriations being made available from the 2020 general budget of the European Union AMOUNT: 260,000,000 The present Humanitarian Implementation Plan (HIP) was prepared on the basis of financing decision ECHO/WWD/BUD/2020/01000 (Worldwide Decision) and the related General Guidelines for Operational Priorities on Humanitarian Aid (Operational Priorities). The purpose of the HIP and its annexes1 is to serve as a communication tool for DG ECHO2’s partners and to assist in the preparation of their proposals. The provisions of the Worldwide Decision and the General Conditions of the Agreement with the European Commission shall take precedence over the provisions in this document. First modification – 26 May 2020 The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the Covid-19 outbreak a public health emergency of international concern on 30 January 2020 and a pandemic on 11 March 2020. The pandemic continues to spread across the region, causing additional humanitarian needs in particular for vulnerable populations.3 In Syria, after more than 9 years of conflict, the health system and water and sanitation infrastructure is particularly inadequate to cope with the pandemic. Densely populated areas in Northwest Syria, including over-crowded IDP camps and informal settlements, are particularly exposed to an outbreak, as access to basic health and WASH services remain scarce, testing capacities extremely low, medical equipment and disposables difficult to procure and humanitarian access particularly challenging.
    [Show full text]
  • To Learn More About Our Activities in Jordan, Download This PDF
    W OVERVIE JORDAN FACTS AND FIGURES 2020 JANUARY – DECEMBER 2020 SUMMARY The year 2020 has been one of uncommon challenges. In Jordan, despite measures imposed to curtail the spread of COVID-19, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) continued its work and maintained its humanitarian activities in several Governorates in the country. ICRC teams were able to support measures aimed at preventing the spread of COVID-19 especially in places of detention. Furthermore, the ICRC provided support to some families of missing persons; supported vulnerable Syrian refugees as well as host communities through livelihood projects and rehabilitated water infrastructure, while it equally trained engineers and operators to run them to ensure that host communities and Syrian refugees gain access to clean water. Some of these activities were carried out in partnership with the Jordan Red Crescent Society (JRCS), to whom we provided technical and material support to enable the JRCS deliver its humanitarian services more effectively, including in its COVID-19 response. One key aspect of our activities was the provision of equipment and facilities to the JRCS hospital. To strengthen the capacity of the health system in the management of COVID-19 infections, the ICRC provided Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and some medical supplies, while it offered training to some medical professionals on how best to respond to emergencies and enhance capacity in physical rehabilitation and provision of healthcare in detention. Consistent with its obligations to promote knowledge of International Humanitarian Law (IHL), the ICRC provided training for members of the Armed and Security Forces in Jordan and participating officers of the Police, Gendarmerie and Civil Defence (PSD), in addition to convening roundtable discussions towards raising awareness on a variety of humanitarian issues with civil society and the media.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Inherent Resolve, Report to the United
    OPERATION INHERENT RESOLVE LEAD INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS JULY 1, 2019‒OCTOBER 25, 2019 ABOUT THIS REPORT In January 2013, legislation was enacted creating the Lead Inspector General (Lead IG) framework for oversight of overseas contingency operations. This legislation, which amended the Inspector General Act, requires the Inspectors General of the Department of Defense (DoD), Department of State (DoS), and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to provide quarterly reports to Congress on overseas contingency operations. The DoD Inspector General (IG) is designated as the Lead IG for Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR). The DoS IG is the Associate IG for OIR. The USAID IG participates in oversight for the operation. The Offices of Inspector General of the DoD, DoS, and USAID are referred to in this report as the Lead IG agencies. Other partner agencies also contribute to oversight of OIR. The Lead IG agencies collectively carry out their statutory missions to: • Develop a joint strategic plan to conduct comprehensive oversight of the contingency operation. • Ensure independent and effective oversight of programs and operations of the Federal Government in support of the contingency operation through either joint or individual audits, inspections, and evaluations. • Report quarterly to Congress and the public on the contingency operation and activities of the Lead IG agencies. METHODOLOGY To produce this quarterly report, the Lead IG agencies submit requests for information to the DoD, DoS, and USAID about OIR and related programs. The Lead IG agencies also gather data and information from open sources, including congressional testimony, policy research organizations, press conferences, think tanks, and media reports.
    [Show full text]
  • MA6-45 6.4.1 Quality of Brackish Water
    6.4 Proposed Desalination Facilities----------------------------------------------MA6-45 6.4.1 Quality of Brackish Water and Seawater--------------------------------MA6-46 6.4.2 Quality of the Treated Water----------------------------------------------MA6-46 6.4.3 Applicable Treatment Process--------------------------------------------MA6-47 6.4.4 Development Plans---------------------------------------------------------MA6-48 6.4.4.1 Aqaba Seawater Desalination Development Plan------------------ MA6-48 6.4.4.2 Alternative Plan of Brackish Groundwater Development Plan---MA6-49 6.4.4.3 Selection of the Brackish Water Development---------------------- MA6-52 6.4.5 Preliminary Design of Aqaba Seawater Desalination Project-------- MA6-52 6.4.6 Preliminary Design of the Brackish Groundwater------------------------ MA6-57 Development Project 6.4.7 Proposed Implementation Schedule--------------------------------------MA6-62 6.5 UFW Improvement Measures-------------------------------------------------MA6-66 6.5.1 Definition of UFW----------------------------------------------------------MA6-66 6.5.2 Current Situation of UFW-------------------------------------------------MA6-66 6.5.2.1 Current Situation--------------------------------------------------------MA6-66 6.5.2.2 Problems to be Solved--------------------------------------------------MA6-67 6.5.3 Improvement Measures for UFW----------------------------------------MA6-67 6.5.3.1 Considerations for UFW Improvement Plan------------------------ MA6-67 6.5.3.2 UFW Improvement Plan-----------------------------------------------MA6-69
    [Show full text]
  • Jordan Facts and Figures 2017
    JORDAN FACTS AND FIGURES January - December 2017 OVERVIEW In 2017, the International Committee of the and organizational capacities. Meanwhile, the Red Cross (ICRC) in Jordan continued to ICRC in Jordan continued to visit detainees, adapt its humanitarian response to both the restore family links and promote respect for emergency and the chronic nature of the Syrian international humanitarian law (IHL), while refugee crisis. In the reporting period, the ICRC delivering large-scale logistical support to the carried out a wide range of activities aimed other ICRC delegations in the region. at supporting both refugee and communities hosting them, primarily with the Jordan Red 40,000 people received a combination Crescent Society (JRCS). of food and essential household items or a In northern Jordan, the ICRC improved cash grant people’s access to clean water by rehabilitating water-supply networks and facilities (i.e. 212,000 people benefited from the ICRC pumping stations), while in southern Jordan, water projects in the north it helped vulnerable people cope with their 13,377 phone calls were provided to circumstances by providing food and hygiene Syrian refugees in Zaatari and Azraq camps in items. The ICRC also launched small income- order to maintain contact with their families generating projects to help refugee female- headed households strengthen their self- 25,000 metric tons of goods and medical sufficiency in a more sustainable manner. supplies were transported from Jordan to nine countries in the region To support the health care system in Jordan, the ICRC strengthened the capacity of selected 1,280 medical consultations were medical facilities in responding to medical provided to refugees in Ruwayshid transit site emergencies by providing materials, equipment and training.
    [Show full text]
  • Syrian Refugees in Host Communities
    Syrian Refugees in Host Communities Key Informant Interviews / District Profiling January 2014 This project has been implemented with the support of: Syrian Refugees in Host Communities: Key Informant Interviews and District Profiling January 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As the Syrian crisis extends into its third year, the number of Syrian refugees in Jordan continues to increase with the vast majority living in host communities outside of planned camps.1 This assessment was undertaken to gain an in-depth understanding of issues related to sector specific and municipal services. In total, 1,445 in-depth interviews were conducted in September and October 2013 with key informants who were identified as knowledgeable about the 446 surveyed communities. The information collected is disaggregated by key characteristics including access to essential services by Syrian refugees, and underlying factors such as the type and location of their shelters. This project was carried out to inform more effective humanitarian planning and interventions which target the needs of Syrian refugees in Jordanian host communities. The study provides a multi-sector profile for the 19 districts of northern Jordan where the majority of Syrian refugees reside2, focusing on access to municipal and other essential services by Syrian refugees, including primary access to basic services; barriers to accessing social services; trends over time; and the prioritised needs of refugees by sector. The project is funded by the British Embassy of Amman with the support of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). The greatest challenge faced by Syrian refugees is access to cash, specifically cash for rent, followed by access to food assistance and non-food items for the winter season.
    [Show full text]