Yanomama Clause Structure

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Yanomama Clause Structure Yanomama Clause Structure Published by LOT phone: +31 30 253 6111 Trans 10 3512 JK Utrecht e-mail: [email protected] The Netherlands http://www.lotschool.nl Cover illustration: Building house, Tɨhɨnakɨ village, Papiu 2011. Photo by Ana Maria Antunes Machado ISBN: 978-94-6093-258-8 NUR 616 Copyright © 2017: Helder Perri Ferreira. All rights reserved. Yanomama Clause Structure Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. dr. J.H.J.M. van Krieken, volgens besluit van het college van decanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 28 november 2017 om 10.30 uur precies door Helder Perri Ferreira geboren op 1 juli 1976 te São Paulo, Brazilië Promotor: Prof. dr. P.C. Muysken Copromotoren: Dr. E.I. Crevels (Universiteit Leiden) Dr. M. Vuillermet (Université Lumière Lyon II, Frankrijk) Manuscriptcommissie: Prof. dr. H. de Hoop (voorzitter) Prof. dr. M.-C. Mattéi Muller (Universidad Central de Venezuela) Dr. F. Seifart (Universiteit van Amsterdam) This research was made possible by a scholarship awarded by the CAPES Foundation of the Ministry of Education of Brazil (proc. no. BEX 0944-12-2). CAPES Foundation Ministry of Education of Brazil Caixa Postal 250 70040-020 Brasília – DF Brazil For Ana and Lino, and in memory of Luís Fernando Pereira Table of contents Acknowledgements xi Abbreviations xiii Part I Chapter 1. Yanomama language and people 3 1.1. The Yanomami people and territory 3 1.2. Typological profile 7 1.3. Genetic relations of the Yanomami linguistic family 10 1.4. Diversity within the Yanomami linguistic family 10 1.5. Yanomam and the variety spoken in Papiu – Yanomama 12 1.6. The region of Papiu: history and the current situation 16 1.7. Early literature 22 1.8. Fieldwork and personal experience with the Yanomami people 25 1.9. Corpus used in this work 27 1.10. Purpose of this work and overview of the following chapters 32 Chapter 2. Phonological sketch 37 2.1. Introduction 37 2.2. Vowels 37 2.3. Consonants 42 2.3.1. Consonantal inventory 42 2.3.2. Consonantal contrasts 43 2.4. Syllable structure 49 2.5. Word and prosodic stress 52 ii Yanomama clause structure 2.6. Allophony 60 2.6.1. Free variation between voiced and voiceless consonants 60 2.6.2. Free variation between lateral approximant [l] and alveolar tap [ɾ] 65 2.6.3. Phonological processes 66 2.6.3.1. Anticipatory weak lowering of the high vowel in bound morphemes 66 2.6.3.2. Progressive backness assimilation by the dynamic morpheme =ɨ 69 2.6.3.3. Full anticipatory vowel harmony of /ə/ in bound morphemes 70 2.6.3.4. Loss of aspiration of the aspirated stop /tʰ/ in bound morphemes 72 2.6.3.5. Progressive lowering of the stative morpheme =o 73 2.6.3.6. Anticipatory nasalization of the approximant /j/ 73 2.6.3.7. Anticipatory alveolarization of palatal /ʃ/ 74 2.6.3.8. Nasalization of the palatal approximant 75 2.6.3.9. Nasalization of the lateral approximant 75 2.7. Orthography 77 2.8. Final remarks 79 Chapter 3. Parts-of-speech, free morphemes, and bound morphemes 81 3.1. Introduction 81 3.2. Nouns and verbs: a semantic first-approach 82 3.3. Nouns, verbs and word order patterns 87 3.3.1. Elicited sentences 88 3.3.2. Spontaneous texts 91 3.4. Basic morphological properties of nouns and verbs 92 3.4.1. Clitic clusters and parts-of-speech 94 3.4.1.1. Nominal clitics 94 3.4.1.2. Verbal clitics 98 Table of contents iii 3.4.1.3. Summary of the clitic clusters 106 3.5. Formal definition of nouns and verbs 107 3.6. Orthography issues about clitic clusters 107 3.7. Concluding remarks 109 Chapter 4. The noun phrase 111 4.1. Introduction 111 4.2. Different types of nouns 114 4.2.1. Morphological structure 120 4.2.2. Size of the paradigms 121 4.2.3. Number markers 125 4.2.4. Behavior in possessive and part-whole constructions 132 4.2.5. Incorporation into the predicate 136 4.2.6. Possibility of omission in minimal clause 139 4.2.7. Possibility of performing the role of agent of transitive clauses 142 4.2.8. Summary of the distinctive features of the nominal types 144 4.2.9. Type 4 – kinship terms 145 4.2.10. Other nouns with ambiguous behavior 156 4.3. Pronouns and Adnominals 161 4.3.1. Possessive Pronouns 162 4.3.2. Demonstratives 165 4.3.3. Quantifiers 169 4.3.4. Personal Pronouns 175 4.3.5. Indefinite pro-form pei 178 4.3.6. Attributive modifiers 182 4.4. Concluding remarks 184 iv Yanomama clause structure Chapter 5. Verb stems 187 5.1. Introduction 187 5.2. Four basic types of verb stems 187 5.3. Differences between the verb stem types 190 5.3.1. Morphemes in present readings 191 5.3.2. Morphemes in imperfective past readings 194 5.3.3. Morphemes in subordinate clauses with =tëhë ‘when’, ‘if’ 195 5.3.4. Inherent argument structure 198 5.3.5. Access to directional markers 202 5.3.6. Access to locational markers 204 5.3.7. Access to nominalizer -rima 207 5.3.8. Access to nominalizer -tima 209 5.3.9. Canonic secondary predication 211 5.3.10. Summary of the distinctive features of the verbal stems 213 5.4. Simple verb stems and verb roots 215 5.4.1. Simple attributive stems 218 5.4.2. Simple positional stems 224 5.4.3. Simple dynamic stems 226 5.4.4. Flexible roots 231 5.4.5. Consonantal roots 234 5.5. Compound verb stems 239 5.5.1. Body-part + verb 240 5.5.2. Clitic + verb 250 5.5.3. Attributive verb + dynamic or attributive verb 256 5.5.4. Reduplication 258 Table of contents v 5.6. Derived verb stems 262 5.6.1. Zero derivation 262 5.6.2. Resultative =no: DYN > ATTR 266 5.6.3. Attenuative =h[V] : ATTR > (attenuated) ATTR 268 5.6.4. Dynamizer =a: POST/ATTR > DYN 269 5.6.5. Intransitive derivational morpheme =pru (=pra): > POST/DYN 276 5.6.6. Transitive derivational morpheme =pra 280 5.6.7. Intransitivizer =mu and the transitivizer =ma: POST>DYN 282 5.6.8. Conservative (to have, to keep, to possess) =pu 284 5.6.9. Attributivizer =ri (used with smells) 288 5.6.10. Derivation: from nouns to verbs 288 5.7. Final discussion 299 Chapter 6. Verb Morphology 301 6.1. Introduction 301 6.2. Tense and aspect 302 6.2.1. Present 302 6.2.2. Past categories 305 6.2.3. Perfective markers 309 6.2.4. Durative =ti 322 6.2.5. Progressive =imatayu 324 6.2.6. Non-punctual or distributive morpheme =ra / =a 326 6.2.7. Celerative =ta 329 6.3. Irrealis mood markers 332 6.3.1. Future irrealis =pë 332 6.3.2. Volitional riã= 335 vi Yanomama clause structure 6.3.3. Conditional xa= 337 6.4. Locational markers 339 6.5. Directional markers 345 6.6. Associated motion 349 6.6.1. Simultaneous motion 351 6.6.2. Motion prior to the action 353 6.6.3. Motion subsequent to the action 356 6.6.4. Motion both prior and subsequent to the action 357 6.6.5. Associated motion summary 358 6.7. Negation 359 6.8. Final discussion 362 Part II Chapter 7. Argument marking: word order, flagging and indexing 365 7.1. Introduction 365 7.2. Some few basic concepts 366 7.2.1. Argument and flagging 366 7.2.2. Verb valency and indexing 367 7.2.3. Core and non-core arguments 372 7.3. Word order 373 7.3.1. Word order patterns in intransitive clauses 373 7.3.2. Word order patterns in transitive clauses 378 7.4. Case system 384 7.4.1. Absolutive: zero case =Ø 388 7.4.2. Ergative =nɨ 393 7.4.3. Instrumental/causal =nɨ 399 Table of contents vii 7.4.4. Additive =xo 403 7.4.5. Obliques =ha and =hamɨ 410 7.5. Verb Indexing 420 7.5.1. Set 1 – Subject (S) and Patient (P) markers 421 7.5.2. Origins of Set 1: procliticization of the enclitics of the absolutive argument 426 7.5.3. Set 2 – Agent (A) markers 429 7.5.4. Morphosyntactic alignment of Sets 1 and 2 434 7.5.5. The different participant marker e= 436 7.6. Concluding remarks 438 Chapter 8. Non-verbal predication 441 8.1. Introduction 441 8.2. Proper inclusion and equative predicates 442 8.2.1. Proper inclusion 442 8.2.2. Equative 448 8.2.3. Equative predicates with possessive constructions 450 8.3. Locative predicates 454 8.4. Existential predicates 457 8.4.1. First strategy 457 8.4.2. Second strategy 459 8.5. Attributive predicates 460 8.6. Final remarks 462 Chapter 9. Valency and Voice changing mechanisms 463 9.1. Introduction 463 9.2. Lexical causatives 464 viii Yanomama clause structure 9.3. Labile causative alternation 465 9.4. Restricted labile alternation among positional stems 472 9.5. Valency-increasing mechanisms 473 9.5.1. Causative marker =ma 473 9.5.2. Argument restructuring and Comrie’s “paradigm case” 478 9.5.3. Transitive morpheme =pra 484 9.5.4. Applicative derivations 487 9.5.4.1. Associative applicative kãyõ= 487 9.5.4.2. Goal/locative applicative napë= kãyõ= / namo= kãyõ= 494 9.5.4.3.
Recommended publications
  • Tutorial in Greek Syntax
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Hochschulschriftenserver - Universität Frankfurt am Main On the morphosyntax of (anti-)causative verbs Artemis Alexiadou1 Universität Stuttgart [email protected] 1. Setting the stage As is well known, in many languages change of state verbs participate in the so called (anti-) causative alternation; this is illustrated in (1) with an English example. Such verbs permit both transitive/causative and intransitive/anticausative construals: (1) a. John broke the window Causative b. The window broke Anticausative2 The paradigm in (1) has been the subject of much discussion in linguistic theory, as its existence raises a number of intriguing questions. In this paper, I address three of them. The first question is whether we are actually dealing with a causative formation or a detransitivization process. Both views have been proposed in the literature: proponents of the causative formation approach claim that the intransitive form is basic (e.g. Dowty 1979; Pesetsky 1995 and others), while proponents of the detransitivization process claim that it is the transitive that is basic, and intransitive one is derived (e.g. Levin & Rappaport Hovav 1995, Chierchia 1989, Reinhart 2000 and others). Recently, a third proposal has been advanced, namely that the two alternates do not stand in a derivational relationship (Alexiadou & al. 2006, Doron 2003). The second question concerns the morphological form of the alternation, namely whether morphological marking plays a role in determining the directionality of the derivation. Derivational approaches typically assume an iconic reasoning; the derived form is expected to be morphologically marked.
    [Show full text]
  • A Grammatical Description of Warao Imperatives: Formal Brevity and Morphological Complexity
    65 Cadernos de Etnolingüística A grammatical description of Warao imperatives: Formal brevity and morphological complexity Allegra Robertsona and Konrad Rybkab aUniversity of California, Berkeley, bMusée du quai Branly - Jacques Chirac Abstract Warao is a morphologically complex language isolate, spoken in Guyana and Venezuela. This paper focuses on the critically endangered Guyanese dialect. First-hand data are used to provide a descriptive analysis of Warao imperative constructions, identify their grammatical features and illocutionary forces, and clarify relevant distinctions concerning telicity. The Warao imperative mood is composed of canonical (2nd singular and 2nd plural) and non-canonical (1st person and 3rd person) imperatives, which are expressed by a set of person-specific verbal suffixes. Both canonical and non-canonical imperatives are negated by the same standard negator. These imperatives commonly express instructions, requests, invitations, warnings, prohibitions, and optatives. As compared to verb forms in other moods, Warao imperatives are syntactically and formally simple; however, the imperative suffixes attach to the morphologically complex Warao verb, thus adding complexity to the compositional meaning of the imperative. In addition to bearing numerous other affixes, the Warao imperatives are often marked as telic. The common marking of telicity in the imperative has led to the reassessment of previous analyses by Osborn (1959) and Romero-Figueroa (2003). The ways in which Warao imperatives adhere to and differ from cross-linguistic trends are also explored. This paper draws on Speech Act Theory, as well as Dixon’s Basic Linguistic Theory more broadly. Keywords: Warao, imperative, morphology, telicity, indigenous language documentation 1 Introduction Imperative constructions are a typologically interesting category of language for several reasons, including their tendency toward simplicity of form.
    [Show full text]
  • Languages of the Middle Andes in Areal-Typological Perspective: Emphasis on Quechuan and Aymaran
    Languages of the Middle Andes in areal-typological perspective: Emphasis on Quechuan and Aymaran Willem F.H. Adelaar 1. Introduction1 Among the indigenous languages of the Andean region of Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, northern Chile and northern Argentina, Quechuan and Aymaran have traditionally occupied a dominant position. Both Quechuan and Aymaran are language families of several million speakers each. Quechuan consists of a conglomerate of geo- graphically defined varieties, traditionally referred to as Quechua “dialects”, not- withstanding the fact that mutual intelligibility is often lacking. Present-day Ayma- ran consists of two distinct languages that are not normally referred to as “dialects”. The absence of a demonstrable genetic relationship between the Quechuan and Aymaran language families, accompanied by a lack of recognizable external gen- etic connections, suggests a long period of independent development, which may hark back to a period of incipient subsistence agriculture roughly dated between 8000 and 5000 BP (Torero 2002: 123–124), long before the Andean civilization at- tained its highest stages of complexity. Quechuan and Aymaran feature a great amount of detailed structural, phono- logical and lexical similarities and thus exemplify one of the most intriguing and intense cases of language contact to be found in the entire world. Often treated as a product of long-term convergence, the similarities between the Quechuan and Ay- maran families can best be understood as the result of an intense period of social and cultural intertwinement, which must have pre-dated the stage of the proto-lan- guages and was in turn followed by a protracted process of incidental and locally confined diffusion.
    [Show full text]
  • 05. Verbal Vp-Modifiers in Samoan Verb Serialization
    VERBAL VP-MODIFIERS IN SAMOAN VERB SERIALIZATION* Jens Hopperdietzel University of Manchester [email protected] This study provides a first investigation of the syntactic and semantic properties of resultative serial verb constructions in the Polynesian language Samoan. Based on syntactic and semantic evidence, I demonstrate that the manner V1 functions as an adjoined event modifier to the causative V2, with further implications for the typology of vP-internal modification. 1. Introduction In Samoan resultative serial verb constructions (henceforth: RSVCs), the initial verb (henceforth: V1) denotes the manner of a causing action, which leads to a change-of-state of the object in which the result state is encoded by a non-initial causative verb (henceforth: V2). The causative verb is derived by the prefix fa’a- (Collins 2017, Mosel 2004, Mosel & Hovdhaugen 1992). (1) a. Sā solo fa’a-mamā e Pita le laulau. SAMOAN PST wipe CAUS-clean ERG Peter ART table.ABS ‘Peter cleaned the table by wiping it.’ b. Sā lamu fa’a-malū e Malia le mea ai. PST chew CAUS-soft ERG Mary ART food.ABS ‘Mary softened the food by chewing it.’ This observation contrasts with RSVCs in other Polynesian languages, such as Niuean (Massam 2013) or Tongan, in which the result state is realized by a stative verb. (2) a. Ne hifi-kū e ia haaku ulu. NIUEAN PST cut-short ERG 3SG GEN.1SG hair ‘She cut my hair short.’ (Massam 2013: 66) b. Kuo vali kulokula e pasikala. TONGAN PRF paint red ABS bicycle ‘The bicycle was painted red.’ (Shumway 1971: 219) * I would like to thank not only Artemis Alexiadou, James Collins, Vera Hohaus, Fabienne Martin, Diane Massam, John Mayer, Florian Schäfer, Giorgos Spathas, Rebecca Tollan and Malte Zimmermann, as well as the audience of ALFA 27 for helpful discussions of this project, but especially Ropeti Ale, Luafata Simanu-Klutz, and Fa’afetai Lēsa, as well as Grant Muāgutui’a, for their patience and for sharing their beautiful language with me.
    [Show full text]
  • Mon-Khmer Studies Volume 41
    MMoonn--KKhhmmeerr SSttuuddiieess VOLUME 43 The journal of Austroasiatic languages and cultures 1964—2014 50 years of MKS Copyright vested with the authors Released under Creative Commons Attribution License Volume 43 Editors: Paul Sidwell Brian Migliazza ISSN: 0147-5207 Website: http://mksjournal.org Published by: Mahidol University (Thailand) SIL International (USA) Contents Issue 43.1 Editor’s Preface iii Michel FERLUS Arem, a Vietic Language. 1-15 Hiram RING Nominalization in Pnar. 16-23 Elizabeth HALL Impact of Tai Lue on Muak Sa-aak phonology. 24-30 Rujiwan LAOPHAIROJ Conceptual metaphors of Vietnamese taste terms. 31-46 Paul SIDWELL Khmuic classification and homeland. 47-56 Mathias JENNY Transitivity and affectedness in Mon. 57-71 J. MAYURI, Karumuri .V. SUBBARAO, Martin EVERAERT and G. Uma Maheshwar RAO Some syntactic aspects of lexical anaphors in select Munda Languages. 72-83 Stephen SELF Another look at serial verb constructions in Khmer. 84-102 V. R. RAJASINGH Interrogation in Muöt. 103-123 Issue 43.2 Suwilai PREMSRIRAT, Kenneth GREGERSON Fifty Years of Mon-Khmer Studies i-iv Anh-Thư T. NGUYỄN Acoustic correlates of rhythmic structure of Vietnamese narrative speech. 1-7 P. K. Choudhary Agreement in Ho 8-16 ii Editors’ Preface The 5th International Conference on Austroasiatic Linguistics (ICAAL5) was held at the Australian National University (ANU) over September 4-5, 2013. The meeting was run in conjunction with the 19th Annual Himalayan Languages Symposium (HLS19), organised locally by Paul Sidwell and Gwendolyn Hyslop. The meetings were made possible by support provided by the following at ANU: Department of Linguistics, College of Asia and the Pacific Research School of Asia Pacific School of Culture, History and Language Tibetan Cultural Area Network Some 21 papers were read over two days at the ICAAL meeting, nine of which have found their way into this special issue of MKS.
    [Show full text]
  • Universals of Causative and Anticausative Verb Formation and the Spontaneity Scale
    2016 LINGUA POSNANIENSIS LVIII (2) DoI 10.1515/linpo-2016-0009 Universals of causative and anticausative verb formation and the spontaneity scale Martin Haspelmath Department of Linguistic and Cultural evolution, Max planck Institute for the Science of human history Institut für anglistik, Leipzig University e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Martin haspelmath. Universals of causative and anticausative verb formation and the spontaneity scale. the poznań Society for the advancement of arts and Sciences, pL ISSn 0079-4740, pp. 33-63 In this paper, I formulate and explain a number of universal generalizations about the formation of causative verbs (overtly marked verbs with causal meaning) and anticausative verbs (overtly marked verbs with non- causal meaning). Given the “spontaneity scale” of basic verb meanings (transitive > unergative > automatic unaccusative > costly unaccusative > agentful), we can say that verb pairs with a noncausal verb higher on the scale tend to be causative pairs, and verb pairs with a noncausal verb lower on the scale tend to be an- ticausative pairs. I propose that these generalizations can be subsumed under form-frequency correspondence: that transitive base verbs tend to form causatives (often analytic causatives) is because they rarely occur in causal contexts, and the fact that unaccusative verbs tend to be coded as anticausatives is because they frequ- ently occur in causal contexts, and special marking is required for the rarer and less expected situation. Keywords: causative verb, linguistic universal, spontaneity scale, transitivity, form-frequency correspondence 1. Introduction In this paper, I propose a unification of a number of cross-linguistic generalizations about the distribution of causative, anticausative and basic verb forms, as well as an explanation of the universals as an instance of the extremely widespread phenomenon of form-frequency correspondence (haspelmath 2018a).
    [Show full text]
  • Unity and Diversity in Grammaticalization Scenarios
    Unity and diversity in grammaticalization scenarios Edited by Walter Bisang Andrej Malchukov language Studies in Diversity Linguistics 16 science press Studies in Diversity Linguistics Chief Editor: Martin Haspelmath In this series: 1. Handschuh, Corinna. A typology of marked-S languages. 2. Rießler, Michael. Adjective attribution. 3. Klamer, Marian (ed.). The Alor-Pantar languages: History and typology. 4. Berghäll, Liisa. A grammar of Mauwake (Papua New Guinea). 5. Wilbur, Joshua. A grammar of Pite Saami. 6. Dahl, Östen. Grammaticalization in the North: Noun phrase morphosyntax in Scandinavian vernaculars. 7. Schackow, Diana. A grammar of Yakkha. 8. Liljegren, Henrik. A grammar of Palula. 9. Shimelman, Aviva. A grammar of Yauyos Quechua. 10. Rudin, Catherine & Bryan James Gordon (eds.). Advances in the study of Siouan languages and linguistics. 11. Kluge, Angela. A grammar of Papuan Malay. 12. Kieviet, Paulus. A grammar of Rapa Nui. 13. Michaud, Alexis. Tone in Yongning Na: Lexical tones and morphotonology. 14. Enfield, N. J (ed.). Dependencies in language: On the causal ontology of linguistic systems. 15. Gutman, Ariel. Attributive constructions in North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic. 16. Bisang, Walter & Andrej Malchukov (eds.). Unity and diversity in grammaticalization scenarios. ISSN: 2363-5568 Unity and diversity in grammaticalization scenarios Edited by Walter Bisang Andrej Malchukov language science press Walter Bisang & Andrej Malchukov (eds.). 2017. Unity and diversity in grammaticalization scenarios (Studies in Diversity Linguistics
    [Show full text]
  • Middles in German
    DISSERTATION Middles in German zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor philosophiae (dr. phil.) im Fach Deutsche Sprachwissenschaft eingereicht an der Philospohischen Fakultät II Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin von Markus Steinbach geboren am 24.03.1967 in Stuttgart Präsident der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin: Prof. Dr. Jürgen Mlynek Dekan der Philospohischen Fakultät II: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Hock Gutachter: 1. Prof. Dr. Manfred Bierwisch 2. Prof. Dr. Günther Grewendorf 3. Prof. Dr. Rainer Dietrich eingereicht: 9. Februar 1998 Datum der Promotion: 12. November 1998 Abstract Deutsch Transitive reflexive Sätze des Deutschen lassen sich unter den Begriff des Mediums fassen. Genauso wie entsprechende Konstruktionen in anderen indoeuropäischen Sprachen sind sie auch im Deutschen mehrdeutig und erlauben eine reflexive, mediale, antikausative und inher- ent reflexive Interpretation. Nach einem Überblick über die für die folgende Diskussion we- sentlichen syntaktischen und semantischen Eigenschaften transitiver reflexiver Sätze wird anhand der Medialkonstruktion gezeigt, daß weder lexikalische noch syntaktische Ansätze in der Lage sind, eine korrekte und einheitliche Analyse der Medialkonstruktion im speziellen und von transitiven reflexiven Sätzen im allgemeinen zu bieten. Deshalb wird für einen neuen, dritten Ansatz argumentiert: a) alle transitiven reflexiven Sätze sind syntaktisch ein- heitlich zu analysieren; b) vermeintliche syntaktische Unterschiede bzgl. Koordination, Fokus und Voranstellung des (Argument- und Nichtargument-) Reflexivums lassen sich semantisch ableiten; c) (schwache) Reflexivpronomen sind bzgl. ihrer morphosyntaktischen Merkmale maximal unterspezifiziert; d) im Deutschen muß zwischen strukturellen und obliquen Kasus- formen unterschieden werden. (c) und (d) erlauben eine einheitliche Analyse der Mehrdeutig- keit des Reflexivpronomens in transitiven reflexiven Sätzen im Rahmen einer entsprechend modifizierten Bindungstheorie. Die in dieser Arbeit entwickelte Theorie wird abschließend auf weitere Eigenschaften der sog.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 on Agent Nominalizations and Why They Are Not Like Event
    On agent nominalizations and why they are not like event nominalizations1 Mark C. Baker and Nadya Vinokurova Rutgers University and Research Institute of Humanities -Yakutsk Abstract: This paper focuses on agent-denoting nominalizations in various languages (e.g. the finder of the wallet), contrasting them with the much better studied action/event- denoting nominalizations. In particular, we show that in Sakha, Mapudungun, and English, agent-denoting nominalizations have none of the verbal features that event- denoting nominalizations sometimes have: they cannot contain adverbs, voice markers, expressions of aspect or mood, or verbal negation. An apparent exception to this generalization is that Sakha allows accusative-case marked objects in agentive nominalizations. We show that in fact the structure of agentive nominalizations in Sakha is as purely nominal as in other languages, and the difference is attributable to the rule of accusative case assignment. We explain these restrictions by arguing that agentive nominalizers have a semantics very much like the one proposed by Kratzer (1996) for Voice heads. Given this, the natural order of semantic composition implies that agentive nominalizers must combine directly with VP, just as Voice heads must. As a preliminary to testing this idea typologically, we show how a true agentive nominalization can be distinguished from a headless subject relative clause, illustrating with data from Mapudungun. We then present the results of a 34-language survey, showing that indeed none of these languages allow clause-like syntax inside a true agentive nominalization. We conclude that a generative-style investigation into the details of particular languages can be a productive source of things to look for in typological surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Bible Verses
    Goal and source in South American languages Emilia Roosvall Department of Linguistics Bachelor’s Programme in Linguistics 180 ECTS credits Spring semester 2020 Supervisor: Bernhard Wälchli Swedish title: Mål och källa i sydamerikanska språk Goal and source in South American languages Emilia Roosvall Abstract This study primarily investigates the expression of two local roles, goal and source, inSouth American languages. Local roles describe the direction of movement or locatedness in relation to a physical object, a ground, in a motion event. While goal expresses motion to or towards and source expresses motion from a ground, these are not always distinguished from one another but sometimes encoded indifferently. A previous cross-linguistic study by Wälchli and Zúñiga (2006) shows that the encoding of goal and source tends to be distinct in Eurasia, North Africa, and Australia, and more diverse in the Americas and New Guinea. However, the sample used in their study is not representative in the Americas. The principal aim of the present study is to determine whether the encoding of goal and source is distinct or indifferent in a representative sample of South American languages, using both reference grammars and parallel texts consisting of Bible translations. The local role path, expressing motion through a ground, is also studied to the extent that this is possible given the data. The findings show that distinct encoding of goal and source is most common in the sample. Indifferent languages are still attested for, yet to a smaller extent than in Wälchli and Zúñiga’s study(2006). Keywords goal, source, South American languages, motion events, linguistic typology Sammanfattning Denna studie undersöker främst uttryck av två lokalroller, mål och källa, i sydamerikanska språk.
    [Show full text]
  • ARAWAK LANGUAGES” by Alexandra Y
    OXFORD BIBLIOGRAPHIES IN LINGUISTICS “ARAWAK LANGUAGES” by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald © Oxford University Press Not for distribution. For permissions, please email [email protected]. xx Introduction General Overviews Monographs and Dissertations Articles and Book Chapters North Arawak Languages Monographs and Dissertations Articles and Book Chapters Reference Works Grammatical and Lexical Studies Monographs and Dissertations Articles and Book Chapters Specific Issues in the Grammar of North Arawak Languages Mixed Arawak-Carib Language and the Emergence of Island Carib Language Contact and the Effects of Language Obsolescence Dictionaries of North Arawak Languages Pre-andine Arawak Languages Campa Languages Monographs and Dissertations Articles and Book Chapters Amuesha Chamicuro Piro and Iñapari Apurina Arawak Languages of the Xingu Indigenous Park Arawak Languages of Areas near Xingu South Arawak Languages Arawak Languages of Bolivia Introduction The Arawak family is the largest in South America, with about forty extant languages. Arawak languages are spoken in lowland Amazonia and beyond, covering French Guiana, Suriname, Guiana, Venezuela, Colombia, Peru, Brazil, and Bolivia, and formerly in Paraguay and Argentina. Wayuunaiki (or Guajiro), spoken in the region of the Guajiro peninsula in Venezuela and Colombia, is the largest language of the family. Garifuna is the only Arawak language spoken in Belize, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Guatemala in Central America. Groups of Arawak speakers must have migrated from the Caribbean coast to the Antilles a few hundred years before the European conquest. At least several dozen Arawak languages have become extinct since the European conquest. The highest number of recorded Arawak languages is centered in the region between the Rio Negro and the Orinoco.
    [Show full text]
  • In and out of Suriname Caribbean Series
    In and Out of Suriname Caribbean Series Series Editors Rosemarijn Hoefte (Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies) Gert Oostindie (Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies) Editorial Board J. Michael Dash (New York University) Ada Ferrer (New York University) Richard Price (em. College of William & Mary) Kate Ramsey (University of Miami) VOLUME 34 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/cs In and Out of Suriname Language, Mobility and Identity Edited by Eithne B. Carlin, Isabelle Léglise, Bettina Migge, and Paul B. Tjon Sie Fat LEIDEN | BOSTON This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-NC 3.0) License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. The realization of this publication was made possible by the support of KITLV (Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies). Cover illustration: On the road. Photo by Isabelle Léglise. This publication has been typeset in the multilingual “Brill” typeface. With over 5,100 characters covering Latin, IPA, Greek, and Cyrillic, this typeface is especially suitable for use in the humanities. For more information, please see www.brill.com/brill-typeface issn 0921-9781 isbn 978-90-04-28011-3 (hardback) isbn 978-90-04-28012-0 (e-book) Copyright 2015 by the Editors and Authors. This work is published by Koninklijke Brill NV. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Brill Nijhoff and Hotei Publishing. Koninklijke Brill NV reserves the right to protect the publication against unauthorized use and to authorize dissemination by means of offprints, legitimate photocopies, microform editions, reprints, translations, and secondary information sources, such as abstracting and indexing services including databases.
    [Show full text]