<<

The City and Ponds Harmful Program

Ellen Kracauer Hartig and Katie Friedman NYC Department of Parks and Recreation

February 28, 2019 Natural Areas

1,600 acres of freshwater wetland 1,500 acres of

Alley Pond Park, ,

Pelham Bay Park, Bronx , Bronx 1,600 acres of grassland 5,300 acres of forest Aquatic Habitat Benefits

Recreational opportunities—accessible by mass transit—for a dense urban population • Rowing, , sailing • , where permitted • Birdwatching • Aesthetic enjoyment Essential habitat for fish, birds and other wildlife Ecosystem services including flood storage and water quality improvement

3 4 Lakes and Ponds Inventory (2015)

• 37 lakes and ponds inventoried

• Approximately 360 acres total

• Shallow depth (<10 ft)

• Shoreline armor varies:

o 13% lakes have predominantly armored shoreline

o 60% have entirely natural shoreline • Water sources include drinking water, untreated stormwater, and naturally occurring streams

• Many lakes are eutrophic due to high phosphorus levels Top: Bowne Pond, Queens. Bottom: Wolfe’s Pond, . 5 Management Concerns

• Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs)

• Fish kills

• Invasive plants, including Phragmites australis

• Fouling by Canada Geese

Actions

• Use of chemical products, including herbicide

• Fountain aerator installation

• Mechanical harvesting

• Shoreline restoration Top: Canada geese at edge Bottom: Weedoo at Indian Lake, , Bronx 6 Lakes and Ponds Bioblitz (August 6, 2015)

Shoreline Metrics • Type of shoreline (armored or natural), • Location of natural inlets, pipes and culverts • Extent of shoreline vegetation • Public access points

Water Quality Metrics • Maximum and average depth • Turbidity (Secchi depth) • Temperature, pH, salinity, dissolved oxygen (multiparameter meter) • Chlorophyll a readings • Nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) • Total Phosphorus, Chlorophyll-α • Phosphate, ammonium, nitrate • Aquatic vegetation

7 Top: Bowne Pond, Queens Bioblitz results—Total Phosphorous Total Phosphorous (TP) concentration Higher numbers suggest poorer conditions

0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30

TP (mg P/L) TP 0.20 0.10 0.00

Phosphorous eutrophic threshold (0.024 mg/L) Hatching indicates lakes inspected for HABs

8 NYC Parks Harmful Algal Bloom (HABs) Program (2015 to Present)

• 28 waterbodies inspected in 2018

• NYC Parks staff and partners ( Conservancy, Alliance, Friends of Van Cortlandt Park) conduct the inspections

• Gobler Laboratory, SoMAS/Stony Brook University conducts the analysis to confirm HABs

• NYS Department of Environmental Conservation sponsors the NYC Parks HABs program

Source: NY Lake Federation and NYSDEC. 2009. Diet for a Small Lake. (Photo credit: Chris Cooley) 9 HABs Monitoring Process

• Inspectors trained in early April

• Inspections performed from late April to October (preferably Mondays)

• Where bloom is suspected, inspectors:

o Photograph and collect a water sample o Overnight samples (on ice) for lab analysis • NYSDEC disseminates results each Friday

• NYC Parks posts signs to inform public where HABs is suspected or confirmed

Prospect Park Lake form and image by Marty Woess, Prospect Park Alliance

10 Example Results for Prospect Park and Central Park Blue green Date Chl-α Microcystin (2018) Water Body Status Extent (µg/L) (µg/L) Genus The Lake in Confirmed with Widespread/ Microcystis, 9-Oct 3,267 >1,000 Central Park High Toxins Lakewide Anabaena Confirmed with Small 9-Oct 15,451 27 Planktothrix High Toxins Localized Prospect Park Widespread/ Microcystis, 9-Oct Confirmed 129,888 16 Lake Lakewide Planktothrix Small Microcystis, 9-Oct Turtle Pond Confirmed 19,598 2 Localized Anabaena No Bloom 9-Oct The Pool No Bloom Present Conservatory No Bloom 9-Oct No Bloom Water Present No Bloom 9-Oct The Pond No Bloom Present Highlighted cells indicate presence of HABs confirmed by laboratory analysis NYSDEC thresholds are: • Confirmed algal bloom: >25 μg/L blue green chlorophyll-α • Confirmed algal bloom with high toxin (HABs): >20 μg/L microcystin

Source: Rebecca Gorney, NYSDEC 11 Results from the 2018 HABs season Number of Number inspections

12 Results for Prospect Park Lake, Brooklyn, and The Lake in Central Park,

May June July August September October

Prospect Park Lake 2018 13 Blooms are confirmed when concentrations of blue green chlorophyll-α are >25 ug/L. Results for Prospect Park Lake, Brooklyn

May June July August September October

Prospect Park Lake 2018 14 Blooms are confirmed when concentrations of blue-green chlorophyll-α are >25 ug/L. Results for The Lake in Central Park, Manhattan

May June July August September October

15 Blooms are confirmed when concentrations of blue-green chlorophyll-α are >25 ug/L. Results for Prospect Park Lake, Brooklyn, and The Lake in Central Park, Manhattan

May June July August September October

Prospect Park Lake 2017 Prospect Park Lake 2018 16 Blooms are confirmed with high toxins when concentrations of microcystin are >20 ug/L. Results for Prospect Park Lake, Brooklyn, and The Lake in Central Park, Manhattan

May June July August September October

Prospect Park Lake 2017 Prospect Park Lake 2018 17 Blooms are confirmed with high toxins when concentrations of microcystin are >20 ug/L. Public Signage

• Installed 103 steel, reusable ‘Caution HABs’ signs at 13 waterbodies in 10 parks “…We advise park-goers to avoid contact with any • Received less than 10 HABs letters in blue-green algae and to keep pets on leashes, only 2018 allowing them contact with bodies of water designated for pets...” • Letters concerned public exposure to HABs and lack of awareness

• Constituents also wrote directly to the Mayor’s Office and to newspapers regarding signage

18 Results of Inspector Questionnaire

• Yearly refreshers would ensure data quality

• How inspectors were assigned varied greatly

• Many hope to continue inspecting

• Inspectors were able to keep to schedule

• Experiences with the public varied. Inspectors found that honesty was the best policy

• Lack of access to refrigeration was an issue for keeping samples on ice

• Suggestions include:

• Using a pole extension to have greater sampling reach • Site visit by experts for each lake to maintain consistency

19 Lessons Learned

• Frequency of inspections can be reduced when there are no HABs

• Willing inspectors increases program success

• Involve more partners and volunteers

• Communication and education are critical

Future

• Investigate biological and chemical management options for future HABs control

• Introduce pilot programs to inhibit HABs

• Apply an integrated approach to reducing nutrient loads

• Warming summer temperatures may increase frequency and extent of HABs Image provided by John Butler, Friends of Van Cortlandt Park. 20 Acknowledgments NYC Parks: Liam Kavanagh, First Deputy Commissioner; Juernine Sheppard, Office of the Commissioner Nancy Barthold, Director of Health and Safety Marit Larson, Chief, Forestry, Horticulture and Natural Resources

Rebecca Swadek, Jamie Ong, Charles Cochran, Kathleen McCarthy, Chris Haight, many borough inspectors, many NYC Parks Interns

Central Park Conservancy: Eric Whittaker, Caroline Greenleaf, John Dillon Friends of Van Cortlandt Park: John Butler Prospect Park Alliance: Marty Woess, Mark Anthony

NYSDEC: Rebecca Gorney, Scott Kishbaugh, Melissa Cohen

Gobler Laboratory/SoMAS, Stony Brook University; Christopher Gobler and Jennifer Jankowiak

Brooklyn College, CUNY: Brett Branco and Jennifer Cherrier

Queens College, CUNY: George Jackman

21 Thank You

Contact us: Ellen Kracauer Hartig, Professional Wetlands Scientist, [email protected]; 212-360-1481 Katie Friedman, Aquatic Ecologist, [email protected], 212-360-1429

22