DOCSLIB.ORG

The Great Swamp Fight in Fairfield

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Great Swamp Fight in Fairfield THE GREAT SWAMP FIGHT IN FAIRFIELD A PAPER PREPARED FOR AND READ AT A MEETING OF THE COLONIAL DAMES BY HON. JOHN H. PERRY ON OCTOBER TWELFTH, NINETEEN HUNDRED AND FIVE NEW YORK 1905 1 mmVi SPiiii ii • X \ THE GREAT SWAMP FIGHT IN FAIRFIELD A PAPER PREPARED FOR AND READ AT A MEETING OF THE COLONIAL DAMES BY HON. JOHN H. PERRY ON OCTOBER TWELFTH, NINETEEN HUNDRED AND FIVE NEW YORK 1905 THE GREAT SWAMP FIGHT IN FAIRFIELD HON. JOHN H. PERRY You are met this afternoon in a town conspicuously honorable and honored even in the Connecticut galaxy. I am not its historian nor its panegyrist. It has notable incumbents of both offices, who should be in my place to-day. While I once professed to right wrongs, I never pretended to write stories, and my present predicament is the evolved outcome of a long line of pious ancestry, my fitness to survive which is demonstrated by a genius for obedience. When I was bidden to read a paper to you I found my ability to disobey atrophied by long disuse. I can tender nothing worthy of the town or the occasion, and I frankly throw myself for mercy upon that peace- with-all-the-world feeling which invariably follows the hospitality of Osborn Hill. To have steadily produced Jenningses and Goulds and Burrs generation after generation would alone pay the debt of any town to its country; but Fairfield, insatiable in usefulness, has not been content with that. She has produced college founders and Yale presidents, great preachers, United States senators and representa- tives, famous poets, learned judges, governors, secretaries of state, and other notables in number out of all proportions to her size. Washington, that sleepiest of presidents, whose nights, geo- graphically considered, are more entertaining than those of Sche- herezade, has slept within her borders, and in the Temple of Lib- erty she offered herself on July 8, 1779, a burnt-sacrifice. But in this Colonial atmosphere let me confine myself to a I R Colonial incident. Fairfield was conceived in a crisis which threat- ened the very existence of the colony of Connecticut, and at the moment of her potential birth was baptized in blood. An Indian band, offshoot from the Six Nations—then a fully organized aboriginal combine for raising hair, and the first great trust known to American history—leaving the parent tribe on the banks of the Hudson, had slowly scrapped its way eastward through quiet tribes long resident in upper Connecticut or lower Massachusetts, until the Connecticut River was crossed, and then, turning southerly, set- tled at last upon the Sound. The date was about 1600; the name Pequot or Mohegan; the disposition restless, treacherous, and blood- thirsty; the final location from the Connecticut River eastward across the Niantic, Thames, Mystic and Pawcatuck into what is now Rhode Island. When Hartford, Windsor, and Wethersfield were settled, in 1635, the Dutch were occasionally somewhat in the way, but the Pequots had to be reckoned with daily. They numbered about six hundred fighting men, and knew no other business. The white settlers were a feeble folk. They could neither hunt, fish, nor cul- tivate their fields, nor travel at home or abroad, save at the peril of their lives. They must needs keep constant watch in light and darkness, and go armed to their daily labors. Before they sat upon the bench in meeting, the butt of a musket found the floor. They lay down and rose up in fear and danger. More than thirty citizens had been murdered, with accompaniment of torture and mutilation beyond belief, when, realizing that the very existence of the colony was at stake, a court is summoned to meet at Hartford on Monday, the 1st of May, 1637. The three towns for the first time send committees. Roger Ludlow, deputy governor, presided, and Andrew Ward, later a distinguished resident of Fairfield, sat in the court. Its action was prompt and resolute, and is thus recorded: 2 " It is ordered that there shalbe an offensive warr agt the Pequoitt and that there shalbe 90 men levied out of the 3 Plan- tacons Hartford Wethersfield and Windsor" . " under the comande of Captain Jo'. Mason." In this resolve behold the first act of sovereignty by the infant colony, and therein Fairfield, as will hereafter appear, lay hidden. So complete are the features of statehood here that we may fairly assign May 1, 1637, as the proper birthday of Connecticut. Listen to a further item from this historic order, pitiful for its confession of youth and weakness: " It is ordered that Windsor shall pruid 60 bushells of Corne, Harteford 84 bushells, Weathersfield 36 bushells, of this each plan- tacon to bake in biskett the on half if by any means they cann, the rest in grounde meale." Down the river, in " one pink, one pinnace and one shallop," went the little company—seventy-seven in all when the forces met. Sailing eastward to Narragansett Bay, they landed, and after a wearisome and perilous march in the early morning of May 26th fell upon a band of the savages sleeping in a so-called " fort " on Pequot Hill, in Groton, killed the flower of the tribe and burned the fort. The colonists returned in triumph to Saybrook, and the pall was lifted from the river towns. I have thus sketched with exceeding brevity the introduction to my task. The last council of the Pequot Nation was held on the day following the capture of this fort. The survivors from far and near attended. It had been proved to be as impossible for them to resist these grim, fearless, pale-faced strangers as it was impossible to conceive the notion of surrender for themselves. They came to a Roman resolution. The path of their original entry into Con- necticut along the river was now barred by the new English towns. 3 The only open route back to the Hudson lay westward along the Sound. Burning their villages and crops, they set out upon the des- perate venture. Sassacus, the greatest of their chiefs and at the time grand sachem, was first, and Mononotto apparently second, in command. Mason, with Stoughton and Patrick from Massa- chusetts, took ships at Saybrook to pursue them by the Sound, while the renegade Mohegan Uncas, with his followers, trailed and harried them along the shore. Roger Ludlow, representing the civil power, accompanied the English. Near Guilford two Pequot Sagamores, with a few followers, were overtaken. Swimming across a small bay in their flight, they were one and all shot by the Mohegans as they landed. Uncas cut off the heads of the chiefs and lodged them in the branches of an oak near the shore, where they hung for years, giving the place the local name of Sachem's Head. Thus the expedition fared on westward. Of the subsequent events, and especially of the great swamp fight in Southport, I know of but one contemporaneous account and but one by an eye-witness. Much has been subsequently written on the subject, and local traditions, many deep, overlie the place, but for an account of what really happened we seem to be confined to the two narratives above referred to. This is unfortunate, for they are brief, the situation lends itself to romance, the local imagination is impatient of re- straint, and Southport pride is creative and boundless. The contemporaneous account is found in a letter from Gov- ernor John Winthrop to William Bradford under date of July 28, 1637, and the story of an eye-witness is a narrative by Captain John Mason himself, written at the colony's request after he had retired to private life in Norwich, some thirty years after the bat- tle. Of this the blunt old soldier, upon learning that it was to be printed, naively says: " I never had thought that this should have 4 come to the Press until of late. If I had I should have endeavored to have put a little more varnish upon it. ... I wish it had fallen into some better hands that might have performed it to the life. I shall only draw the curtain and open my little casement, that so others of larger hearts and abilities may let in a bigger light." Compelled often to borrow the very words of these two narra- tives for adequate description, let me portray to you the raison d'etre of Fairfield. After the incident at Sachem's Head, the Lilliputian fleet soon sailed into the Quinepiack, where is now New Haven. Seeing a great smoke in the woods and supposing some of their enemy might be there, they hastened ashore, but discovered only Connecticut Indians. Returning to their vessels, they remained a few days, while a Pequot captive—named by the English, Luz—was sent upon discovery. To the quaintly expressed surprise of Mason the spy proved faithful, and barely escaping with his life, returned with tidings of Sassacus and the Pequots. Sassacus, suspecting treachery and failing in his effort to kill the Indian, became alarmed, and with Mononotto and some twenty braves left the band and fled precipitately to the Mohawks. " So " —to quote from Winthrop's letter—" our men missed of him; yet dividing themselves and ranging up and down as the providence of God guided them (for the Indians were all gone save three or four, and they knew not where to find them, or else would not), upon the thirteenth of this month (July, 1637) they lighted upon a great company, viz., 80 strong men and 200 women and chil- dren, in a small Indian town fast by a hideous swamp, which they all slipped into before our men could get at them." This so-called "lighting upon" is thus further described by Mason: "We then hastened our march towards the place where the enemy was, and coming into a corn-field several of the English espyed some Indians, who fled from them.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Accused: Fairfield’S Witchcraft Trials September 25, 2014 – January 5, 2015 Educator Guide
    Accused: Fairfield’s Witchcraft Trials September 25, 2014 – January 5, 2015 Educator Guide Accused: Fairfield’s Witchcraft Trials September 25, 2014 – January 5, 2015 Teacher Guide Index Introduction: The Legacy of Witchcraft Page 3 Essential Questions & Big Ideas Page 5 Accused Suggested Mini-Activity Page 6 Online Teacher Resources: Lesson Plans & Student Activities Page 7 Student & Teacher Resources: Salem Pages 9 - 10 New England Witchcraft Trials: Overview & Statistics Page 10 New England Witchcraft Timeline Pages 12 - 13 Vocabulary Page 14 Young Adult Books Page 15 Bibliography Page 15 Excerpts from Accused Graphic Novel Page 17 - 19 Educator Guide Introduction This Educator Guide features background information, essential questions, student activities, vocabulary, a timeline and a booklist. Created in conjunction with the exhibition Accused: Fairfield’s Witchcraft Trials, the guide also features reproductions of Jakob Crane’s original illustrations and storylines from the exhibition. The guide is also available for download on the Fairfield Museum’s website at www.fairfieldhistory.org/education This Educator Guide was developed in partnership with regional educators at a Summer Teacher Institute in July, 2014 and co-sponsored by the Fairfield Public Library. Participants included: Renita Crawford, Bridgeport, CT Careen Derise, Discovery Magnet School, Bridgeport, CT Leslie Greene, Side By Side, Norwalk, CT Lauren Marchello, Fairfield Ludlowe High School, Fairfield, CT Debra Sands-Holden, King Low Heywood Thomas School, Stamford, CT Katelyn Tucker, Shelton Public Schools, CT About the Exhibition: In 17th century New England religious beliefs and folk tradition instilled deep fears of magic, evil, and supernatural powers. How else to explain unnatural events, misfortune and the sudden convulsions and fits of local townspeople? In this exhibition, the fascinating history of Connecticut’s witchcraft trials is illuminated by author and illustrator Jakob Crane.
    [Show full text]
  • The Exchange of Body Parts in the Pequot War
    meanes to "A knitt them togeather": The Exchange of Body Parts in the Pequot War Andrew Lipman was IN the early seventeenth century, when New England still very new, Indians and colonists exchanged many things: furs, beads, pots, cloth, scalps, hands, and heads. The first exchanges of body parts a came during the 1637 Pequot War, punitive campaign fought by English colonists and their native allies against the Pequot people. the war and other native Throughout Mohegans, Narragansetts, peoples one gave parts of slain Pequots to their English partners. At point deliv so eries of trophies were frequent that colonists stopped keeping track of to individual parts, referring instead the "still many Pequods' heads and Most accounts of the war hands" that "came almost daily." secondary as only mention trophies in passing, seeing them just another grisly were aspect of this notoriously violent conflict.1 But these incidents a in at the Andrew Lipman is graduate student the History Department were at a University of Pennsylvania. Earlier versions of this article presented graduate student conference at the McNeil Center for Early American Studies in October 2005 and the annual conference of the South Central Society for Eighteenth-Century comments Studies in February 2006. For their and encouragement, the author thanks James H. Merrell, David Murray, Daniel K. Richter, Peter Silver, Robert Blair St. sets George, and Michael Zuckerman, along with both of conference participants and two the anonymous readers for the William and Mary Quarterly. 1 to John Winthrop, The History ofNew England from 1630 1649, ed. James 1: Savage (1825; repr., New York, 1972), 237 ("still many Pequods' heads"); John Mason, A Brief History of the Pequot War: Especially Of the memorable Taking of their Fort atMistick in Connecticut In 1637 (Boston, 1736), 17 ("came almost daily").
    [Show full text]
  • (King Philip's War), 1675-1676 Dissertation Presented in Partial
    Connecticut Unscathed: Victory in The Great Narragansett War (King Philip’s War), 1675-1676 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Major Jason W. Warren, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: John F. Guilmartin Jr., Advisor Alan Gallay, Kristen Gremillion Peter Mansoor, Geoffrey Parker Copyright by Jason W. Warren 2011 Abstract King Philip’s War (1675-1676) was one of the bloodiest per capita in American history. Although hostile native groups damaged much of New England, Connecticut emerged unscathed from the conflict. Connecticut’s role has been obscured by historians’ focus on the disasters in the other colonies as well as a misplaced emphasis on “King Philip,” a chief sachem of the Wampanoag groups. Although Philip formed the initial hostile coalition and served as an important leader, he was later overshadowed by other sachems of stronger native groups such as the Narragansetts. Viewing the conflict through the lens of a ‘Great Narragansett War’ brings Connecticut’s role more clearly into focus, and indeed enables a more accurate narrative for the conflict. Connecticut achieved success where other colonies failed by establishing a policy of moderation towards the native groups living within its borders. This relationship set the stage for successful military operations. Local native groups, whether allied or neutral did not assist hostile Indians, denying them the critical intelligence necessary to coordinate attacks on Connecticut towns. The English colonists convinced allied Mohegan, Pequot, and Western Niantic warriors to support their military operations, giving Connecticut forces a decisive advantage in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocm01251790-1863.Pdf (10.24Mb)
    u ^- ^ " ±i t I c Hon. JONATHAN E. FIELD, President. 1. —George Dwight. IJ. — K. M. Mason. 1. — Francis Briwiej'. ll.-S. .1. Beal. 2.— George A. Shaw. .12 — Israel W. Andrews. 2.—Thomas Wright. 12.-J. C. Allen. 3. — W. F. Johnson. i'i. — Mellen Chamberlain 3.—H. P. Wakefield. 13.—Nathan Crocker. i.—J. E. Crane. J 4.—Thomas Rice, .Ir. 4.—G. H. Gilbert. 14.—F. M. Johnson. 5.—J. H. Mitchell. 15.—William L. Slade. 5. —Hartley Williams. 15—H. M. Richards. 6.—J. C. Tucker. 16. —Asher Joslin. 6.—M. B. Whitney. 16.—Hosea Crane. " 7. —Benjamin Dean. 17.— Albert Nichols. 7.—E. O. Haven. 17.—Otis Gary. 8.—William D. Swan. 18.—Peter Harvey. 8.—William R. Hill. 18.—George Whitney. 9.—.]. I. Baker. 19.—Hen^^' Carter. 9.—R. H. Libby. 19.—Robert Crawford. ]0.—E. F. Jeiiki*. 10.-—Joseph Breck. 20. —Samuel A. Brown. .JOHN MORIS?5KV, Sevii^aiU-ut-Anns. S. N. GIFFORU, aerk. Wigatorn gaHei-y ^ P=l F ISSu/faT-fii Lit Coiranoittoralllj of llitss3t|ttsttts. MANUAL FOR THE USE OF THE G-ENERAL COURT: CONTAINING THE RULES AND ORDERS OF THE TWO BRANCHES, TOGETHER WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH, AND THAT OF THE UNITED STATES, A LIST OF THE EXECUTIVE, LEGISLATIVE, AND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENTS OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT, STATE INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR OFFICERS, COUNTY OFFICERS, AND OTHER STATISTICAL INFORMATION. Prepared, pursuant to Orders of the Legislature, BY S. N. GIFFORD and WM. S. ROBINSON. BOSTON: \yRIGHT & POTTER, STATE PRINTERS, No. 4 Spring Lane. 1863. CTommonbtaltfj of iBnssacf)useits.
    [Show full text]
  • William Bradford Makes His First Substantial
    Ed The Pequot Conspirator White William Bradford makes his first substantial ref- erence to the Pequots in his account of the 1628 Plymouth Plantation, in which he discusses the flourishing of the “wampumpeag” (wam- pum) trade: [S]trange it was to see the great alteration it made in a few years among the Indians themselves; for all the Indians of these parts and the Massachusetts had none or very little of it, but the sachems and some special persons that wore a little of it for ornament. Only it was made and kept among the Narragansetts and Pequots, which grew rich and potent by it, and these people were poor and beggarly and had no use of it. Neither did the English of this Plantation or any other in the land, till now that they had knowledge of it from the Dutch, so much as know what it was, much less that it was a com- modity of that worth and value.1 Reading these words, it might seem that Bradford’s understanding of Native Americans has broadened since his earlier accounts of “bar- barians . readier to fill their sides full of arrows than otherwise.”2 Could his 1620 view of them as undifferentiated, arrow-hurtling sav- ages have been superseded by one that allowed for the economically complex diversity of commodity-producing traders? If we take Brad- ford at his word, the answer is no. For “Indians”—the “poor and beg- garly” creatures Bradford has consistently described—remain present in this description but are now joined by a different type of being who have been granted proper names, are “rich and potent” compared to “Indians,” and are perhaps superior to the English in mastering the American Literature, Volume 81, Number 3, September 2009 DOI 10.1215/00029831-2009-022 © 2009 by Duke University Press Downloaded from http://read.dukeupress.edu/american-literature/article-pdf/81/3/439/392273/AL081-03-01WhiteFpp.pdf by guest on 28 September 2021 440 American Literature economic lay of the land.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacies of King Philip's War in the Massachusetts Bay Colony
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1987 The legacies of King Philip's War in the Massachusetts Bay Colony Michael J. Puglisi College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Puglisi, Michael J., "The legacies of King Philip's War in the Massachusetts Bay Colony" (1987). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539623769. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-f5eh-p644 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. For example: • Manuscript pages may have indistinct print. In such cases, the best available copy has been filmed. • Manuscripts may not always be complete. In such cases, a note will indicate that it is not possible to obtain missing pages. • Copyrighted material may have been removed from the manuscript. In such cases, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is also filmed as one exposure and is available, for an additional charge, as a standard 35mm slide or as a 17”x 23” black and white photographic print.
    [Show full text]
  • The Puritan Dilemma
    Library of American Biography / EDITED BY OSCAR HANDLIN 6/|l Edmund S. Morgan The Puritan Dilemma The Story ofJohn Winthrop Morgan The Puritan dilemma 3 !39 - , <, DEC 2 1974 PROSPECT FEB 2 6 1386/27-tf-t ilffiOCT 1 NOV : , -APR 171996 Edmund S. Morgan Tke Puritan Dilemma The Story of Jonn Wintnrop ^5^ ited by Ostcar Hand/in Little, Brown and Company Boston * Toronto COPYRIGHT, , 1958, BY EDMUND S. MORGAN ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NO PART OF THIS BOOK MAY BE REPRO- DUCED IN ANY FORM WITHOUT PERMISSION IN WRITING FROM THE PUBLISHER, EXCEPT BY A REVIEWER WHO MAY QUOTE BRIEF PAS- SAGES IN A REVIEW TO BE PRINTED IN A MAGAZINE OR NEWSPAPER. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOG CARD NO. 58-6029 First Paperbac^ Printing Published simultaneously in Canada by Little, Brown & Company {Canada} Limited PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA For my mother Editor's Prerace FROM its first discovery, the emptiness of the New World made it the field for social experiment. Euro- peans, crowded in by their seeming lack of space and by a rigid social order, looked with longing across the ocean where space and opportunity abounded. Time and again, men critical of their own society hoped by migration to find the scope for working out their visions of a better order. Yet, in the actual coming, as likely as not, they en- countered the standing quandary of the revolutionary. They had themselves been rebels in order to put into prac- tice their ideas of a new society. But to do so they had to restrain the rebellion of others.
    [Show full text]
  • The Governors of Connecticut, 1905
    ThegovernorsofConnecticut Norton CalvinFrederick I'his e dition is limited to one thousand copies of which this is No tbe A uthor Affectionately Dedicates Cbis Book Co George merriman of Bristol, Connecticut "tbe Cruest, noblest ana Best friend T €oer fia<T Copyrighted, 1 905, by Frederick Calvin Norton Printed by Dorman Lithographing Company at New Haven Governors Connecticut Biographies o f the Chief Executives of the Commonwealth that gave to the World the First Written Constitution known to History By F REDERICK CALVIN NORTON Illustrated w ith reproductions from oil paintings at the State Capitol and facsimile sig natures from official documents MDCCCCV Patron's E dition published by THE CONNECTICUT MAGAZINE Company at Hartford, Connecticut. ByV I a y of Introduction WHILE I w as living in the home of that sturdy Puritan governor, William Leete, — my native town of Guil ford, — the idea suggested itself to me that inasmuch as a collection of the biographies of the chief executives of Connecticut had never been made, the work would afford an interesting and agreeable undertaking. This was in the year 1895. 1 began the task, but before it had far progressed it offered what seemed to me insurmountable obstacles, so that for a time the collection of data concerning the early rulers of the state was entirely abandoned. A few years later the work was again resumed and carried to completion. The manuscript was requested by a magazine editor for publication and appeared serially in " The Connecticut Magazine." To R ev. Samuel Hart, D.D., president of the Connecticut Historical Society, I express my gratitude for his assistance in deciding some matters which were subject to controversy.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Genealogical Society Quarterly
    Consolidated Contents of The National Genealogical Society Quarterly Volumes 1-90; April, 1912 - December, 2002 Compiled by, and Copyright © 2011-2013 by Dale H. Cook This file is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material directly from plymouthcolony.net, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact [email protected] so that legal action can be undertaken. Any commercial site using or displaying any of my files or web pages without my express written permission will be charged a royalty rate of $1000.00 US per day for each file or web page used or displayed. [email protected] Revised August 29, 2013 As this file was created for my own use a few words about the format of the entries are in order. The entries are listed by NGSQ volume. Each volume is preceded by the volume number and year in boldface. Articles that are carried across more than one volume have their parts listed under the applicable volumes. This entry, from Volume 19, will illustrate the format used: 19 (1931):20-24, 40-43, 48, 72-76, 110-111 (Cont. from 18:92, cont. to 20:17) Abstracts of Revolutionary War Pension Applications Jessie McCausland (Mrs. A. Y.) Casanova The first line of an entry for an individual article or portion of a series shows the NGSQ pages for an article found in that volume. When a series spans more than one volume a note in parentheses indicates the volume and page from which or to which it is continued.
    [Show full text]
  • Vital Allies: the Colonial Militia's Use of Indians in King Philip's War, 1675--1676
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Master's Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Spring 2011 Vital allies: The colonial militia's use of Indians in King Philip's War, 1675--1676 Shawn Eric Pirelli University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Pirelli, Shawn Eric, "Vital allies: The colonial militia's use of Indians in King Philip's War, 1675--1676" (2011). Master's Theses and Capstones. 146. https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis/146 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VITAL ALLIES: THE COLONIAL MILITIA'S USE OF iNDIANS IN KING PHILIP'S WAR, 1675-1676 By Shawn Eric Pirelli BA, University of Massachusetts, Boston, 2008 THESIS Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts In History May, 2011 UMI Number: 1498967 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT Dissertation Publishing UMI 1498967 Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle of Pequot Swamp Archaeological
    Technical Report Battle of Pequot (Munnacommock) Swamp, July 13-14, 1637 Department of the Interior National Park Service American Battlefield Protection Program GA-2287-15-008 Courtesy Fairfield Museum and History Center This material is based upon work assisted by a grant from the Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of the Interior. David Naumec, Ashley Bissonnette, Noah Fellman, Kevin McBride September 13, 2017 1 | GA-2287-15-008 Technical Report Contents I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................4 Project Goals and Results ................................................................................................ 5 II. Preservation & Documentation of Pequot War Battlefield Sites ..............................6 Preservation ..................................................................................................................... 6 Documentation ................................................................................................................ 6 Defining the Battlefield Boundary and Core Areas ........................................................ 8 III. Historic Context ......................................................................................................10 Contact, Trade, and Pequot Expansion in Southern New England
    [Show full text]
  • Nine Men's Misery©
    NINE MEN’S MISERY© Victor Franko Part One: The Novel Copyright 2003 Victor Franko. All rights reserved except for license to Leonard Bucklin and Joseph Bucklin Society. 1 Dedication No matter how unusual or crazy the outcome is, how bizarre the situation becomes, or how ironic the moment is graced, everything in life happens for a reason. After researching the event and completing the investigation, I came to accept the fact that there is no such thing as dumb luck or odd occurrences. Having devoted my time and energy in the search and enquire of the event, I had no choice but to honor the event in history by writing this book out of respect for not only the 9 men who the site is named after, but to the hundreds of curious visitors who pay homage to the site every year. Whether good or bad, I hope and pray that it does more than less to its story. With all my heart and virtues, I’d like to thank the following: The people and the town of Cumberland, Rhode Island for not only being my backyard for so many years, but for their time and belief in my vision of a storyteller. There is not a home, a street, or a brook in Cumberland that does not have a story. Bob & Ryan Billington for appreciating the time spent together on the topic and throughout the research. Thank you for your work on the site and its story. I hope the time spent together as father and son on the project will live throughout your lives as some of the best memories held onto.
    [Show full text]