DOCSLIB.ORG

The Governors of Connecticut, 1905

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ThegovernorsofConnecticut Norton CalvinFrederick I'his e dition is limited to one thousand copies of which this is No tbe A uthor Affectionately Dedicates Cbis Book Co George merriman of Bristol, Connecticut "tbe Cruest, noblest ana Best friend T €oer fia<T Copyrighted, 1 905, by Frederick Calvin Norton Printed by Dorman Lithographing Company at New Haven Governors Connecticut Biographies o f the Chief Executives of the Commonwealth that gave to the World the First Written Constitution known to History By F REDERICK CALVIN NORTON Illustrated w ith reproductions from oil paintings at the State Capitol and facsimile sig natures from official documents MDCCCCV Patron's E dition published by THE CONNECTICUT MAGAZINE Company at Hartford, Connecticut. ByV I a y of Introduction WHILE I w as living in the home of that sturdy Puritan governor, William Leete, — my native town of Guil ford, — the idea suggested itself to me that inasmuch as a collection of the biographies of the chief executives of Connecticut had never been made, the work would afford an interesting and agreeable undertaking. This was in the year 1895. 1 began the task, but before it had far progressed it offered what seemed to me insurmountable obstacles, so that for a time the collection of data concerning the early rulers of the state was entirely abandoned. A few years later the work was again resumed and carried to completion. The manuscript was requested by a magazine editor for publication and appeared serially in " The Connecticut Magazine." To R ev. Samuel Hart, D.D., president of the Connecticut Historical Society, I express my gratitude for his assistance in deciding some matters which were subject to controversy. Many current but unreliable anecdotes I have omitted after careful con sideration, and much care has been taken to record entertainingly only facts that are of essential interest and worth to the public-at- large. Knowing the inclination of both dates and data to become distorted, I secured the services of Mr. Frederick E. Norton, of the editorial staff of the "Hartford Courant," — a name-sake by chance,— to edit my original manuscript by verifying every fact and date herein given by his own original research. ByV I a y of Introduction Im a under obligation to several persons for many favors shown and valuable assistance cheerfully given in securing the material for these sketches. My thanks are especially due to the late Charles Jeremy Hoadly, LL.D., long time librarian of the Connecticut State Library. One of the ripest historians of this or any other generation, his vast storehouse of historical information was always open to investigators. Dr. Hoadly furnished many facts for the compilation of the following sketches which the author desires to publicly acknowledge. Professor F ranklin Bowditch Dexter, assistant librarian of Yale University, placed at my disposal much valuable information in the shape of rare books, pamphlets, etc., not elsewhere to be found, which assisted materially in the preparation of these sketches. Few scholars of this or any other state are as ready and willing to assist students of history in their investigation as Professor Dexter. Among t he volumes consulted may be specially mentioned the " History of Hartford County," edited by Dr. J. Hammond Trumbull and Mr. Charles Hopkins Clark. This work contains some valuable articles by Miss Mary K. Talcott on the original proprietors of Hartford, and from these articles were obtained many facts of interest regarding the early governors of Connecticut colony. The " Civil and Judicial History of Connecticut," edited by the late Judge Dwight Loomis, contributed many important details regarding the lives of the chief executives who were mem bers of the legal profession. Trumbull's, Hollister's and Barber's By W ay of Introduction general h istories of Connecticut, were freely consulted, as well as that unique and brilliant volume, " Connecticut : A Study of a Commonwealth Democracy" by the late lamented Professor Alexander Johnston of Princeton University. All t hat I have attempted in this the first collected account of the governors of Connecticut is to place in a concise and per manent form the principal events in the life of each governor from John Haynes of Coddicot to Henry Roberts of Hartford. Fifty-eight m en have been chosen governors of Connecticut in the last two hundred and sixty-seven years. Including the royal governor, popularly known as a usurper, there are therefore fifty-nine biographies in this book, appearing in the consecutive order in which each one was first called to the governorship. The s ubject has been more and more fascinating during the years that I have worked at it ; and now that I am about to dis miss the last page of my book it is with the hope that the work will fill a place in the biographical history of our Commonwealth. Its i indeed my own fond intention to make, at some time in years to come, when time permits, a still further study of the lives of the founders of Connecticut. Frederick C alvin Norton Bristol, C onnecticut First Day of December Nineteen Hundred and Five Digest o f the Governors of Connect icu NPage umber Biography Full N ame of Governor Born Birthplace Education I 1 John H aynes 1594 Coddicot, E ng. II i Edward H opkins 1 6 00 Shrewsbury, E ng. III 13 George W yllys 1570 Fenny C ompton, Eng. University IV 19 Thomas W elles 1598 •London, E ng. V John W ebster •Warwickshire, E ng. VI 28 John W inthrop 1606 Groton M anor, Eng. Trinity C ollege (Dublin, I re.) VII 35 William L eete 1612 Dodington, E ng. For t he Bar VIII 4i Robert T reat 1622 ♦Pitminster, E ng. Royal 47 Sir E dmund Andros 1637 London, E ng. Royal C ourt IX 57 Fitz-John W inthrop 1639 Ipswich, M ass. Harvard C ollege X 63 Gurdon S altonstall 1666 Haverhill, M ass. Harvard C ollege XI 69 Joseph T alcott 1669 Hartford, C onn. XII 75 Jonathan L aw 1674 Milford, C onn. Harvard C ollege XIII 81 Roger W olcott 1679 Windsor, C onn. Self - Educated XIV 87 Thomas F itch 1700 Norwalk, C onn. Yale C ollege XV 93 William P itkin 1694 East H artford, Conn. XVI 99 Jonathan T rumbull 1710 Lebanon, C onn. Harvard C ollege XVII 107 Matthew G riswold 1714 Lyme, C onn. Self-Educated XVIII 113 Samuel H untington 1731 Windham, C onn. Self-Educated XIX 119 Oliver W olcott 1726 Windsor, C onn. Yale C ollege XX 127 Jonathan T rumbull, 2nd 1740 Lebanon, C onn. Harvard C ollege XXI 133 John T readwell 1745 Farmington, C onn. Yale C ollege XXII 139 Roger G riswold 1762 Lyme, C onn. Yale C ollege XXIII 145 John C otton Smith 1765 Sharon, C onn. Yale C ollege XXIV 151 Oliver W olcott 1760 Litchfield, C onn. Yale C ollege * N ot fully authenticated. tabulated C ontents of this Volume Agewhen Chosen Occupation Residence Aged When C hosen When C hosen Datef o Yearsf o Governor Governor j S ervice Service Died Biography Land O wner Hartford 45 1639-41,43.45. 8 1653-4 59 I (planter) 47.49.51.53 Trading Hartford 40 1640,44,46,48, 7 1657 57 II Merchant 50,52,54 Land O wner Hartford 72 1642-43 1 1645 75 III (planter) Land O wner Hartford 57 8«655. 5 2 1660 62 IV (planter) Land O wner Hartford 1656-57 1 1661 V (planter) Adventurer New L ondon 51 J657. 5 9-76 18 1676 70 VI and S cholar Magistrate Guilford 64 1676-83 7 1683 71 VII Military Milford 61 15 1710 89 VIII Leader Military New Y ork 50 1687-89 iyr. 1714 77 Royal 6 m os. Military New L ondon 60 1698-1707 9 1707 69 IX Clergyman New L ondon 42 1708-25 17 1724 58 X Military Hartford 56 1725-42 17 1741 72 xi Judiciary Milford 68 1742-51 9 1750 76 XII Military Windsor 72 1751-54 3 1767 89 XIII Lawyer Norwalk 54 1754-66 12 1774 74 XIV Judiciary Hartford 72 1766-69 3 1769 75 XV Merchant- Lebanon 59 1769-84 15 1/85 75 XVI Lawyer Lawyer Lyme 70 1784-86 2 1799" 85 XVII Lawyer Norwich 55 1786-96 9 y rs. 1796 65 XVIII 8 m os. Physician Litchfield 70 1796-97 1 y r. 1797 7i XIX 11 m os. Statesman Lebanon 57 1 7 97-1 809 11 y rs. 18C9 69 XX 8 m os. Judiciary Farmington 64 1 8 09- 1 1 1 y r. 1823 78 XXI 9 m os. Statesman Lyme 49 1811-12 1 y r. J812 50 XXII 5 m os. Judiciary Sharon 47 1812-17 4 y rs. 1845 80 XXIII 7 m os. Manufacturer Litchfield 57 1817-27 10 1833 XXIV (Statesman) 73 * A ges are given i 1 l acked a few weeks of the age recorded. Digest o f the Governors of Connect /cut U 3a Biography 55 Full N ame of Governor Born Birthplace Education & P.cd XXV 161 Gideon T omlinson 1780 Stratford, C onn. Yale C ollege XXVI 167 John S amuel Peters 1772 Hebron, C onn. Self-Educated XXVII 173 Henry W aggaman Edwards 1779 New H aven, Conn. fCollege o New J ersey XXVIII 177 Samuel A ugustus Foote 1780 Cheshire, C onn. Yale C ollege XXIX 183 William W olcott Ellsworth 1 7 91 Windsor, C onn. Yale C ollege XXX 189 Chauncey F itch Cleveland 1799 Canterbury, C onn.
Recommended publications
  • Challenging Perceptions of the Lawyer As Civic Linchpin In

    Challenging Perceptions of the Lawyer As Civic Linchpin In

    Where Did All the Lawyers Go? Challenging Perceptions of the Lawyer as Civic Linchpin in New Haven: 1830‐1890 By: Leslie Esbrook1 ‐But above all a lawyer will find his highest honor in a deserved reputation for fidelity to private trust and to public duty, as an honest man and as a patriotic and loyal citizen. –The Final Prays of the Canon of Ethics2 Lawyers have traditionally been portrayed as models for civic representation, epitomized by their role in the founding of the Republic. In recent studies a consensus has formed around the idea that the legal profession lost its civic‐mindedness, sometime between the nineteenth and beginning of the twentieth centuries. Consequently, the story goes, lawyers have lost a key part of the profession that elevated the law to a higher plane compared to other career paths. This paper will explore the history of this shift using New Haven and the greater Connecticut forum for empirical data. The paper will challenge the historical narrative by detailing internal inconsistencies amongst leading scholars, both in terms of time frame of decline and the amount and kind of civic participation envisioned as exemplary. I will show that, at least at the local level in New Haven, the shift of lawyers as history remembers did not occur in a radical, sudden fashion at all; by the end of the century a non‐trivial amount of lawyers continued to fully participate in civic life. Finally, I will track prevalent theories behind the myth of the lawyer’s civic decline and superimpose them on the facts relative to New Haven to show that the conflicting results accrued from the data support the absence of causal findings for the current theories in vogue.
  • Introduction, the Constitution of the State of Connecticut

    Introduction, the Constitution of the State of Connecticut

    Sacred Heart University DigitalCommons@SHU Government, Politics & Global Studies Faculty Government, Politics & Global Studies Publications 2011 Introduction, The onsC titution of the State of Connecticut Gary L. Rose Sacred Heart University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/gov_fac Part of the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Rose, Gary L., "Introduction, The onC stitution of the State of Connecticut" (2011). Government, Politics & Global Studies Faculty Publications. Paper 2. http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/gov_fac/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Government, Politics & Global Studies at DigitalCommons@SHU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Government, Politics & Global Studies Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@SHU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTRODUCTION Connecticut license plates boldly bear the inscription, “the Constitution State.” This is due to Connecticut’s long and proud tradition of self-government under the protection of a written constitution. Connecticut’s constitutional tradition can be traced to the Fundamental Orders of 1639. Drafted by repre- sentatives from the three Connecticut River towns of Hartford, Wethersfi eld and Windsor, the Fundamental Orders were the very fi rst constitution known to humankind. The Orders were drafted completely free of British infl uence and established what can be considered as the fi rst self-governing colony in North America. Moreover, Connecticut’s Fundamental Orders can be viewed as the foundation for constitutional government in the western world. In 1662, the Fundamental Orders were replaced by a Royal Charter. Granted to Connecticut by King Charles II, the Royal Charter not only embraced the principles of the Fundamental Orders, but also formally recognized Connecticut’s system of self-government.
  • Miniatures at the Metropolitan Museum of Art Diane Dias De Fazio Developed for Ken Soehner's Museums & Library Research Course, Summer 2014

    Miniatures at the Metropolitan Museum of Art Diane Dias De Fazio Developed for Ken Soehner's Museums & Library Research Course, Summer 2014

    Precious Little Things: Miniatures at the Metropolitan Museum of Art Diane Dias De Fazio Developed for Ken Soehner's Museums & Library Research course, Summer 2014. The items. The project. Students were invited to explore the collections of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, and envision themselves as museum curators. The final project asked students to define a common theme, select twelve items that fell within that theme, research the items, and create an exhibition catalog for the items, providing descriptions and photographs for each object. My selected theme, miniatures within the Museum's collection, was examined via items that spanned several centuries of art history and numerous different media. Two-fifths of my catalog consisted of American art, but my exhibition spanned centuries, museum departments, and geographic regions. I incorporated items from Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas (AAOA) in the pre-Columbian period, Greek and Roman, the departments of Musical Instruments, Medieval art, and from the Thomas J. Watson Library. My final product comprised descriptions for twelve items—a Greek aryballos faience vase in the shape of a hedgehog, a hunchback figure from the Olmec culture, a wood rosary bead, a miniature "pocket" violin, two 32mo fine bindings from France ca. 1784, three American portrait miniatures, two pieces of miniature glass, and a metalwork miniature by the House of Carl Fabergé. The catalog was fifty-one pages long, cited 150 references, and each source was annotated with further information about the publication. Because of my extensive research, the catalog also included brief descriptions for five additional items and twenty-five additional sources in a secondary bibliography.
  • Acts of the Commissioners of the United Colonies of New England

    Acts of the Commissioners of the United Colonies of New England

    CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY ..CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 3 1924 083 937 122 Cornell University Library ^^ The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924083937122 RECORDS OF PLYMOUTH COLONY. %tk of i\t Comittissioitfi's of !lje Initfb Colonies of felo €\4ml YOL. I. ] 643-1051. RECORDS OF THE COLONY OF NEW PLYMOUTH IN NEW ENGLAND. PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE LEGISLATURE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. EDITED BY DAVID PULSIFER, CLERK IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH, MEMBER OF THE NEW ENGLAND HISTORIC-GENEALOfilCAL SOCIETY, VIXLOW OP TllK AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, CORKESPONDINQ MEMBER OP THE ESSEX INSTITUTE, AND OF THE RHODE ISLAND, NEW YORK, COXNKCTICUT AND WISCONSIN BISTORICAL SOCIETIES. %t\^ of Jlje ^tinimissioners of Ijje InM Colonirs of Btfo ^iiglank VOL. I. 1643-1651. BOSTON: FROM THE PRESS OF WILLIAM WHITE, rRINTEK TO THE COMMONWEALTH. 185 9. ^CCRMELL^ ;UNIVERSITY LJ BRARY C0MM0.\))EALT11 OF MASSACHUSETTS. ^etrflarn's f eprtnunt. Boston, Apkil o, 1858. By virtue of Chapter forty-one of the Eesolves of the year one thousand eight hundred fifty-eight, I appoint David Pulsifee, Esq., of Boston, to super- intend the printing of the New Plymouth Records, and to proceed with the copying, as provided in previous resolves, in such manner and form as he may consider most appropriate for the undertaking. Mr. Pulsifer has devoted many years to the careful exploration and transcription of ancient records, in the archives of the County Courts and of the Commonwealth.
  • (King Philip's War), 1675-1676 Dissertation Presented in Partial

    (King Philip's War), 1675-1676 Dissertation Presented in Partial

    Connecticut Unscathed: Victory in The Great Narragansett War (King Philip’s War), 1675-1676 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Major Jason W. Warren, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: John F. Guilmartin Jr., Advisor Alan Gallay, Kristen Gremillion Peter Mansoor, Geoffrey Parker Copyright by Jason W. Warren 2011 Abstract King Philip’s War (1675-1676) was one of the bloodiest per capita in American history. Although hostile native groups damaged much of New England, Connecticut emerged unscathed from the conflict. Connecticut’s role has been obscured by historians’ focus on the disasters in the other colonies as well as a misplaced emphasis on “King Philip,” a chief sachem of the Wampanoag groups. Although Philip formed the initial hostile coalition and served as an important leader, he was later overshadowed by other sachems of stronger native groups such as the Narragansetts. Viewing the conflict through the lens of a ‘Great Narragansett War’ brings Connecticut’s role more clearly into focus, and indeed enables a more accurate narrative for the conflict. Connecticut achieved success where other colonies failed by establishing a policy of moderation towards the native groups living within its borders. This relationship set the stage for successful military operations. Local native groups, whether allied or neutral did not assist hostile Indians, denying them the critical intelligence necessary to coordinate attacks on Connecticut towns. The English colonists convinced allied Mohegan, Pequot, and Western Niantic warriors to support their military operations, giving Connecticut forces a decisive advantage in the field.
  • Puritan New England: Plymouth

    Puritan New England: Plymouth

    Puritan New England: Plymouth A New England for Puritans The second major area to be colonized by the English in the first half of the 17th century, New England, differed markedly in its founding principles from the commercially oriented Chesapeake tobacco colonies. Settled largely by waves of Puritan families in the 1630s, New England had a religious orientation from the start. In England, reform-minded men and women had been calling for greater changes to the English national church since the 1580s. These reformers, who followed the teachings of John Calvin and other Protestant reformers, were called Puritans because of their insistence on purifying the Church of England of what they believed to be unscriptural, Catholic elements that lingered in its institutions and practices. Many who provided leadership in early New England were educated ministers who had studied at Cambridge or Oxford but who, because they had questioned the practices of the Church of England, had been deprived of careers by the king and his officials in an effort to silence all dissenting voices. Other Puritan leaders, such as the first governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, John Winthrop, came from the privileged class of English gentry. These well-to-do Puritans and many thousands more left their English homes not to establish a land of religious freedom, but to practice their own religion without persecution. Puritan New England offered them the opportunity to live as they believed the Bible demanded. In their “New” England, they set out to create a model of reformed Protestantism, a new English Israel. The conflict generated by Puritanism had divided English society because the Puritans demanded reforms that undermined the traditional festive culture.
  • The Connecticut Western Reserve

    The Connecticut Western Reserve

    Published on Hinckley Township (http://hinckleytwp.org) Home > Community > History > Connecticut Western Reserve The Connecticut Western Reserve At present the term Western Reserve has only an historical meaning; but to the Medina pioneers it had immediate significance, because originally Medina was a part of this unique section of Ohio. What are its unique characteristics? First, that the State of Connecticut was permitted to retain this part of her western lands in 1787 when the other states ceded theirs to the federal government; and secondly, the way in which Connecticut disposed of this huge piece of land which extended westward 120 miles from the Pennsylvania-Ohio boundary and southward from Lake Erie to the forty-first parallel, comprising an area of over 3,000,000 acres. The Western Reserve may also be described as a somewhat irregular quadrilateral in northeastern Ohio, with Conneaut, Youngstown, Willard, and Port Clinton at its corners. A glance at the map will show that the forty-first parallel is the southern boundary of both Connecticut and of the Western Reserve. Several of the original colonies held grants of land which extended as far west as the Pacific Ocean because of the royal ignorance of or disdain for North American geography. Shortly after the beginning of the development of the Connecticut Colony, this small area became so overcrowded that groups of its citizens migrated to the Wyoming Valley in Pennsylvania. There they established settlements, as this land was also included in Connecticut's original grant from Charles II of England. These claims caused a series of bloody struggles between the Connecticut settlers and the Pennsylvanians, because the Connecticut claims conflicted with the claims of the proprietors of Pennsylvania.
  • CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present

    CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present

    CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy.
  • General Assembly

    General Assembly

    18t3 MANUAL, WITH FOR THE USE OF THE General Assembly OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT. 1883. PRINTED BY ORDER OF TIIE COMMITTEE. [Compiled by E.~FuR Coon:.] HARTFORD, CONN.: PRESS OF 'l'HE CASE, LOCKWOOD & BRAINAllD COMPANY. 1883. JOINT COMThfiTTEE ON MANUAL AND ROLL. SENATE. OWEN B. KING. HOUSE. THOMAS II. DELANO, BUELL CARTER, HORACE M. BANCROFT. THE CONSTITUTION OF CONNECTICUT. PREil!BLE. The people of Connecticut, acknowledging with gratitude the good providence of God in having permitted them to enjoy a free government, do, in order more effectually to define, secure, and perpetuate the liberties, rights, and privi­ leges which they have derived from their ancestors, hereby, after a careful considerntion and revision, ordain and estab­ lish the following Constitution and form of civil government: ARTICLE FIRST. DECLARATION OF R!GUTS. That the great and essential principles of liberty and free government may be recognized and established, ~t ~tdart, SECTION l. That all men, when they form a social com­ pact, are equal in rights; and that no man or set of men are entitled to exclusive public emoluments or privileges from the community. SEC. 2. '!'hat all political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their benefit; and that they have at all times an undeniable and indefeasible right to alter their form of government in such a manner as they may think expedient. SEc. 3. The exercise and enjoyment of religious profes­ sion and worship, without discrimination, shall forever be 4 CO.KSTITUTION. free to all per ons in this State, provided that the right hero by declared and established shall not be so construed as to ex­ cuse acts of licentiou ness, or to ju tify practices inconsistent with the pence and safety of the State.
  • Participant List

    Participant List

    Participant List 10/20/2019 8:45:44 AM Category First Name Last Name Position Organization Nationality CSO Jillian Abballe UN Advocacy Officer and Anglican Communion United States Head of Office Ramil Abbasov Chariman of the Managing Spektr Socio-Economic Azerbaijan Board Researches and Development Public Union Babak Abbaszadeh President and Chief Toronto Centre for Global Canada Executive Officer Leadership in Financial Supervision Amr Abdallah Director, Gulf Programs Educaiton for Employment - United States EFE HAGAR ABDELRAHM African affairs & SDGs Unit Maat for Peace, Development Egypt AN Manager and Human Rights Abukar Abdi CEO Juba Foundation Kenya Nabil Abdo MENA Senior Policy Oxfam International Lebanon Advisor Mala Abdulaziz Executive director Swift Relief Foundation Nigeria Maryati Abdullah Director/National Publish What You Pay Indonesia Coordinator Indonesia Yussuf Abdullahi Regional Team Lead Pact Kenya Abdulahi Abdulraheem Executive Director Initiative for Sound Education Nigeria Relationship & Health Muttaqa Abdulra'uf Research Fellow International Trade Union Nigeria Confederation (ITUC) Kehinde Abdulsalam Interfaith Minister Strength in Diversity Nigeria Development Centre, Nigeria Kassim Abdulsalam Zonal Coordinator/Field Strength in Diversity Nigeria Executive Development Centre, Nigeria and Farmers Advocacy and Support Initiative in Nig Shahlo Abdunabizoda Director Jahon Tajikistan Shontaye Abegaz Executive Director International Insitute for Human United States Security Subhashini Abeysinghe Research Director Verite
  • Bushnell Family Genealogy, 1945

    Bushnell Family Genealogy, 1945

    BUSHNELL FAMILY GENEALOGY Ancestry and Posterity of FRANCIS BUSHNELL (1580 - 1646) of Horsham, England And Guilford, Connecticut Including Genealogical Notes of other Bushnell Families, whose connections with this branch of the family tree have not been determined. Compiled and written by George Eleazer Bushnell Nashville, Tennessee 1945 Bushnell Genealogy 1 The sudden and untimely death of the family historian, George Eleazer Bushnell, of Nashville, Tennessee, who devoted so many years to the completion of this work, necessitated a complete change in its publication plans and we were required to start anew without familiarity with his painstaking work and vast acquaintance amongst the members of the family. His manuscript, while well arranged, was not yet ready for printing. It has therefore been copied, recopied and edited, However, despite every effort, prepublication funds have not been secured to produce the kind of a book we desire and which Mr. Bushnell's painstaking work deserves. His material is too valuable to be lost in some library's manuscript collection. It is a faithful record of the Bushnell family, more complete than anyone could have anticipated. Time is running out and we have reluctantly decided to make the best use of available funds by producing the "book" by a process of photographic reproduction of the typewritten pages of the revised and edited manuscript. The only deviation from the original consists in slight rearrangement, minor corrections, additional indexing and numbering. We are proud to thus assist in the compiler's labor of love. We are most grateful to those prepublication subscribers listed below, whose faith and patience helped make George Eleazer Bushnell's book thus available to the Bushnell Family.
  • Transcript of Lecture Delivered By

    Transcript of Lecture Delivered By

    Transcript of Lecture Delivered by Sherrill Foster, 4 Fireplace Road, East Hampton, NY 11937 on Thursday, September 27, 2001 at The East Hampton Library MERCHANTS AND EARLY EAST HAMPTON* This paper is about commercial contacts and their importance to early East Hampton. I am not the first to suggest that trade and commerce are vital to the origins of the area. Timothy Breen has said this, as has Richard Dunn.[1]passim. NY 1999. The major players are - much to no one’s surprise - Lion Gardiner and John Mulford. I am pleased to be presented by such an organization as the East Hampton Library. I want to thank Tom Twomey and Diana Dayton for this opportunity to present the results of many years of research into the early history of East Hampton. East Hampton as a provisioning port on Block Island Sound, that great water highway, was founded by merchants - settlers interested in making money. Contrary to what romantics like to believe, Lion Gardiner acquired the island in typical colonial fashion, first in May of 1639, by purchasing it with gifts and a deed signing with the Montauk Indians, notarized by that Boston lawyer, Thomas Lechford.[2]1931, pp. 92-95. Then, again in March of 1640, he purchased the island through James Forrett/Farrett[3](Sag Harbor, 1887) Vol I, p. 1., the agent for the Earl of Sterling (William Alexander). Gardiner had to purchase his island from the owner of this grant, the Earl of Sterling, who had just been granted Long Island with other islands along the southern coast of New England.