DOCSLIB.ORG

January 2007 Volume 16, No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
January 2007 Volume 16, No January 2007 Volume 16, No. 1 APS NEWS www.aps.org/publications/apsnews Highlights Wireless Non-Radiative Energy Transfer A PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY • WWW.APS.ORG/PUBLICATIONS/APSNEWS Page 6 Particle Physicists Meet Halfway Jacksonville Hosts 2007 April Meeting The 2007 APS April Meeting will cists, a high school teachers’ day, a and registration information, be held April 14-17 in sunny students lunch with the experts, and are available online at Jacksonville, Florida. The scientific the presentation of several APS prizes http://www.aps.org/meetings/april/ program, which focuses on astro- and awards in a special ceremonial index.cfm. The abstract submission physics, particle physics, nuclear session. A public lecture, on the deadline is January 12; post-dead- physics, and related fields, will con- physics of NASCAR, will be given line abstracts received by February 5 sist of three plenary sessions, approx- by Diandra Leslie-Pelecky of the will be assigned as poster presenta- imately 75 invited sessions, more University of Nebraska. tions. Early registration closes on than 100 contributed sessions, and Further details of the program, February 23. poster sessions. Among the invited sessions will April Meeting Plenary Talks be a special Nobel Prize session at Saturday, April 14 Laboratory which both of this year’s laureates, • String Theory, Branes, and if John Mather and George Smoot, will • First Results from Gravity You Wish, the Anthropic speak. Probe B, Francis Everitt, Stanford University Principle, Shamit Kachru, APS units represented at the meet- Stanford University ing include the Divisions of • Two-Dimensional Electron Photo by Kay Kinoshita Astrophysics, Nuclear Physics, Systems, Allan MacDonald, Tuesday, April 17 Particles and Fields, Physics of University of Texas at Austin • The 21-cm Background: A The APS Division of Particles and Fields held a joint meeting with their colleagues Beams, Plasma Physics, and • New Measurement of the Probe of Reionization and the from the Japanese Physical Society in Honolulu. The meeting, which ran from Computational Physics; the Forums Electron Magnetic Moment and Dark Ages, Jacqueline Hewitt, October 29 to November 3, was styled the Joint Meeting of Pacific Region Particle Massachusetts Institute of Physics Communities, with about 650 attendees, from not only the US and Japan on Education, Physics and Society, the Fine Structure Constant, but other Pacific Rim nations such as China, Korea, Canada and Taiwan. International Affairs, History of Gerald Gabrielse, Harvard Technology Shown here enjoying a moment of Hawaii sunshine on Waikiki beach are Physics, and Graduate Student University • The Threat to the Planet: Junko Shigemitsu (Ohio State), Mavourneen Wilcox (U. of Hawaii), Hirokazu Affairs; and the Topical Groups on Monday, April 16 Actions Needed to Avert Ishino (Tokyo Institute of Technology), and Wei Wang (Boston University). Few-Body Systems, Precision • Cosmology After WMAP, Dangerous Climate Change, Measurement and Fundamental David Spergel, Princeton James E. Hansen, NASA Task Force Suggests Enhancements Constants, Gravitation, Plasma University • New Results from RHIC on the for the APS April Meeting Astrophysics, and Hadronic Physics. • The Energy Problem: What Can Spin Structure of Proton, Steven In addition to the regular program, Physicists Do?, Steven Chu, Vigdor, Indiana University The Task Force on the Future of that APS continue to sponsor a year- there will be a professional develop- Lawrence Berkeley National the April Meeting reported to the ly meeting organized by the units tra- ment workshop for women physi- Council at its November meeting. It ditionally associated with the April New Investments Needed in Defense Research, had been constituted a year earlier to meeting, they propose giving the “examine the goals and outcomes of meeting a new title that evokes the Says Task Force on Innovation Report the April meeting from the point of main scientific motifs, such as “A Increased support for defense optics and microelectronics–have The Task Force calls for the view of its various constituencies.” Universe of Physics.” basic research is needed for nation- played a major role in establishing administration to include defense The charge to the task force allowed In addition, the task force recom- al security and economic compet- and maintaining our military supe- basic research in the American it to “suggest enhancements, changes mends that each year, the program itiveness, says the Task Force on the riority. To help American troops Competitiveness Initiative. The in the structure of the meeting, or should identify a small number of Future of American Innovation in retain their advantage on the battle- American Competitiveness even termination of the meeting.” In themes. The themes will describe a report released in November. field in the future, it is critical that Initiative would double, over 10 its report, the task force recommend- topics to be treated in depth, though The report, entitled Measuring new investments be made today in years, the federal funding for basic ed that the April Meeting should con- the meeting as a whole would con- the Moment: Innovation, National areas such as energy storage, mate- research at NSF, DOE’s Office of tinue, but could be enhanced with a tinue to cover the same diversity of Security, and Economic rials research, nanotechnology and Science, and NIST. new name and some highlighted topics. The task force believes that Competitiveness, is a follow-up to high-performance computing,” says Speaking at the November 16 themes. defining some key topics in advance the Task Force’s February 2005 the report. INNOVATION continued on page 5 The April Meeting, which covers would give potential participants an report, which presented bench- particle physics, nuclear physics, additional incentive to attend. They marks showing that the United They liked it! They really liked it! astrophysics and related fields, plays also note the success of the nine ple- States is in danger of losing its a “unifying role for the physics com- nary lectures, and recommend giving competitiveness in science and munity, and provides a valuable forum them more emphasis in pre-meeting engineering. The new report shows for the interplay between physics and publicity. that many of those trends continue. society,” says the task force report. The task force also recommends At the November 16 report Nonetheless, the task force members exploring opportunities for joint meet- release event in Washington, the believe the meeting could benefit ings with other societies, such as Task Force and several national 3 from greater coherence and could AAS, AAPT, AAPM, public policy security experts called for increas- “serve more effectively as a celebra- organizations, divisional meetings, ing defense basic research in par- tion of our science and as an occasion and IEEE divisions, and the occa- ticular. Defense basic research is to explore common interests with sional participation of APS units other central to both economic and other scientific organizations.” than those traditionally represented at national security, but federal spend- The April Meeting serves sever- the April meeting. ing on defense basic research has al different purposes, said task force They also want to encourage unit remained flat for over three chair Chris Quigg of Fermilab. “For program organizers to experiment decades, the Task Force says. many physicists, it’s the excellent with different types of sessions. For The Task Force on the Future of Photo by Ken Cole scientific program that attracts them. instance, some units may want to try American Innovation is a coalition Albert Einstein (aka Marc Spiegel) and Chris Andersen have every reason to People also appreciate the broader holding poster sessions instead of ten of businesses and business organ- get excited. Spiegel starred in, and Andersen directed, a 14-minute APS-pro- plenary talks, physics and society minute talks or creating themed mini- izations, scientific societies, and duced video,“Einstein's Miracle Year,” that was distributed to thousands of mid- talks, education and outreach activi- conferences within the meeting. “The higher education associations, dle-school classrooms in 2005 and 2006. The video was awarded a coveted ties, and a sense of coherence that hope is that by encouraging people to including the APS. The task force CINE Golden Eagle award (clutched in Spiegel's right hand) in the non-telecast children's entertainment and education category in the Spring 2006 competi- couldn’t be had any other way.” look at different ways of using this advocates increased federal sup- tion. APS originally produced the video to accompany the PhysicsQuest proj- The task force made several rec- meeting we can make it better and port for research in the physical ect kits during the World Year of Physics, but the video proved so popular that ommendations intended to raise the more coherent,” said Quigg. sciences and engineering. copies were distributed independently the following year as well. Other recipi- profile of the meeting and increase As for location and scheduling of “Breakthroughs in basic sci- ents of CINE Golden Eagles in past years have included Steven Spielberg, George Lucas, Martin Scorsese, and Ken Burns. participation. While recommending TASK FORCE continued on page 5 ence–such as those in radar, lasers, 2 January • 2007 APS NEWS Members in the Media This Month in Physics History “You can fit a million of these Columbus Dispatch, December 4, crystals on the end of a human hair.” 2006 January 1925: Wolfgang Pauli John Lindl, Lawrence Livermore “What they’ll be looking for is announces the exclusion principle National Lab, on a new form of man- radioactive contaminants made at made diamond, Tri-Valley Herald, the same time. They’ll do the best November 10, 2006 he year 1925 was an important one for tum numbers made sense physically, since they they can technically. But my guess quantum physics, beginning with Wolfgang related to the electron’s motion around the nucle- “I like the bad ones as much as is that it will take an informant.” TPauli’s January announcement of the exclu- us.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2005 CERN–CLAF School of High-Energy Physics
    CERN–2006–015 19 December 2006 ORGANISATION EUROPÉENNE POUR LA RECHERCHE NUCLÉAIRE CERN EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH 2005 CERN–CLAF School of High-Energy Physics Malargüe, Argentina 27 February–12 March 2005 Proceedings Editors: N. Ellis M.T. Dova GENEVA 2006 CERN–290 copies printed–December 2006 Abstract The CERN–CLAF School of High-Energy Physics is intended to give young physicists an introduction to the theoretical aspects of recent advances in elementary particle physics. These proceedings contain lectures on field theory and the Standard Model, quantum chromodynamics, CP violation and flavour physics, as well as reports on cosmic rays, the Pierre Auger Project, instrumentation, and trigger and data-acquisition systems. iii Preface The third in the new series of Latin American Schools of High-Energy Physics took place in Malargüe, lo- cated in the south-east of the Province of Mendoza in Argentina, from 27 February to 12 March 2005. It was organized jointly by CERN and CLAF (Centro Latino Americano de Física), and with the strong support of CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas). Fifty-four students coming from eleven different countries attended the School. While most of the students stayed in Hotel Rio Grande, a few students and the Staff stayed at Microtel situated close by. However, all the participants ate their meals to- gether at Hotel Rio Grande. According to the tradition of the School the students shared twin rooms mixing nationalities and in particular Europeans together with Latin Americans. María Teresa Dova from La Plata University was the local director for the School.
    [Show full text]
  • Real Time Density Functional Simulations of Quantum Scale
    Real Time Density Functional Simulations of Quantum Scale Conductance by Jeremy Scott Evans B.A., Franklin & Marshall College (2003) Submitted to the Department of Chemistry in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2009 c Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2009. All rights reserved. Author............................................... ............... Department of Chemistry February 2, 2009 Certified by........................................... ............... Troy Van Voorhis Associate Professor of Chemistry Thesis Supervisor Accepted by........................................... .............. Robert W. Field Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Theses This doctoral thesis has been examined by a Committee of the Depart- ment of Chemistry as follows: Professor Robert J. Silbey.............................. ............. Chairman, Thesis Committee Class of 1942 Professor of Chemistry Professor Troy Van Voorhis............................... ........... Thesis Supervisor Associate Professor of Chemistry Professor Jianshu Cao................................. .............. Member, Thesis Committee Associate Professor of Chemistry 2 Real Time Density Functional Simulations of Quantum Scale Conductance by Jeremy Scott Evans Submitted to the Department of Chemistry on February 2, 2009, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Abstract We study electronic conductance through single molecules by subjecting
    [Show full text]
  • The Struggle for Quantum Theory 47 5.1Aliensignals
    Fundamental Forces of Nature The Story of Gauge Fields This page intentionally left blank Fundamental Forces of Nature The Story of Gauge Fields Kerson Huang Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA World Scientific N E W J E R S E Y • L O N D O N • S I N G A P O R E • B E I J I N G • S H A N G H A I • H O N G K O N G • TA I P E I • C H E N N A I Published by World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. 5 Toh Tuck Link, Singapore 596224 USA office: 27 Warren Street, Suite 401-402, Hackensack, NJ 07601 UK office: 57 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London WC2H 9HE British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. FUNDAMENTAL FORCES OF NATURE The Story of Gauge Fields Copyright © 2007 by World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. All rights reserved. This book, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without written permission from the Publisher. For photocopying of material in this volume, please pay a copying fee through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. In this case permission to photocopy is not required from the publisher. ISBN-13 978-981-270-644-7 ISBN-10 981-270-644-5 ISBN-13 978-981-270-645-4 (pbk) ISBN-10 981-270-645-3 (pbk) Printed in Singapore.
    [Show full text]
  • Leo P. Kadanoff (1937–2015): an Appreciation RETROSPECTIVE
    RETROSPECTIVE Leo P. Kadanoff (1937–2015): An appreciation RETROSPECTIVE Susan N. Coppersmitha,1 Leo P. Kadanoff, who died on October 26, 2015, models depended greatly on devoted his scientific life to trying to elucidate how small changes in the ingre- much of the world can be understood using mathe- dients put into the models. matical models. Historically, physics has addressed this Leo recognized that this sen- problem by searching for fundamental laws that com- sitivity of the results on the pletely specify the right ingredients to put into a theo- details of the models that he retical model. For example, the standard model of constructed made it difficult to particle physics provides a specification of the proper- make robust predictions, and ties of elementary particles and their interactions. after several years he returned Inprinciple,thestandardmodelcouldbeusedto to physics research (6). Over describe macroscopic physical systems. However, the succeeding decades, Leo because of the enormous number of elementary investigated a broad variety of particles in any macroscopic amount of matter, imple- complex systems, with a particu- menting such a calculation is not feasible. Leo was the lar focus on identifying phenom- first to understand clearly that the behavior of systems ena with universal features. He on different length scales can be understood using excelled at bringing people to- different effective theories, and that the effective gether to perform interdisciplin- theories that describe macroscopic phenomena should ary investigations incorporating be derivable by a suitable mathematical procedure theory, experiment, and compu- from the microscopics (1, 2). K. G. Wilson succeeded in tation, and thought deeply about constructing a complete mathematical formulation of the role of computation in scien- Leo P.
    [Show full text]
  • Nehmen Wir An, Die Kuh Ist Eine Kugel... «
    dtv Lawrence M. Krauss »Nehmen wir an, die Kuh ist eine Kugel ...« Nur keine Angst Vor Physik Nicht nur Faust wollte wissen, »was die Welt im Innersten zusammenhält.« Dabei muß man kein Physiker sein, um das moderne Weltbild der Physik – von Galilei Bis Stephen Hawking – zu verstehen. Lawrence M. Krauss zeigt uns, wie spannend und unterhaltsam die Beschäftigung mit der Physik sein kann. Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag »Nehmen wir an, die Kuh ist eine Kugel...« Ziemlich abwegig, mag mancher denken. Aber wie sinnvoll solche radikalen Ver- einfachungen sein können, zeigt Lawrence M. Krauss an vielen anschaulichen und vergnüglichen Beispielen. Wer wissen will, »was die Welt im Innersten zusammenhält«, sieht nach der Lektüre dieses Buches klarer, denn man muß kein Physiker sein, um das moderne Weltbild der Physik - von Galilei bis Stephen Hawking - zu verstehen. «Mit der Selbstverständlichkeit eines Hausherrn führt Krauss seine Leser durch das Gedankengebäude der theoretischen Physik: von der Relativitätstheorie über die Quantendynamik hin zu einer Theorie >über alles<. Weil er dabei so originell und unkonventionell vorgeht wie sein Lehrer Richard Feynman, ist die Lektüre das reine Vergnügen.« (Physikalische Blätter, Weinheim) Lawrence M. Krauss, geboren 1954 in New York, ist Professor für Physik und Astronomie und Leiter des Instituts für Physik an der Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland. Er lieferte bedeutende Beiträge über die Vorgänge bei explodierenden Sternen bis hin zum Ursprung und der Natur des Stoffes, aus dem das Universum ist. Zahlreiche Veröffentlichungen. Lawrence M. Krauss »Nehmen wir an, die Kuh ist eine Kugel... « Nur keine Angst vor Physik Mit 39 Schwarzweißabbildungen Aus dem Amerikanischen von Wolfram Knapp Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag Ungekürzte Ausgabe August 1998 Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag GmbH & Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Physics One
    CHICAGO PHYSICS ONE 3:25 P.M. December 02, 1942 “All of us... knew that with the advent of the chain reaction, the world would never be the same again.” former UChicago physicist Samuel K. Allison Physics at the University of Chicago has a remarkable history. From Albert Michelson, appointed by our first president William Rainey Harper as the founding head of the physics department and subsequently the first American to win a Nobel Prize in the sciences, through the mid-20th century work led by Enrico Fermi, and onto the extraordinary work being done in the department today, the department has been a constant source of imagination, discovery, and scientific transformation. In both its research and its education at all levels, the Department of Physics instantiates the highest aspirations and values of the University of Chicago. Robert J. Zimmer President, University of Chicago Welcome to the inaugural issue of Chicago Physics! We are proud to present the first issue of Chicago Physics – an annual newsletter that we hope will keep you connected with the Department of Physics at the University of Chicago. This newsletter will introduce to you some of our students, postdocs and staff as well as new members of our faculty. We will share with you good news about successes and recognition and also convey the sad news about the passing of members of our community. You will learn about the ongoing research activities in the Department and about events that took place in the previous year. We hope that you will become involved in the upcoming events that will be announced.
    [Show full text]
  • CHICAGO PHYSICS 3 Quantum Worlds
    CHICAGO PHYSICS 3 Quantum Worlds Welcome to the third issue of Chicago Physics! This past year has been an eventful one for our Department and we hope that you will join in our excitement. In our last issue, we highlighted our Strickland from University of Waterloo, the Department’s research on topological physics, third Maria Goeppert-Mayer Lecturer and the covering the breadth of what we do in this third female Physics Nobel Prize winner. research area from the nano to the cosmic The University has renamed the Physics scale and the unity in the concepts that drive Research Center that opened in 2018 as the us all. In the current issue, we will take you on Michelson Center for Physics in honor of a journey to the quantum world. former faculty member Albert A. Michelson, The year had several notable events. The a pioneering scientist who was the first physics faculty had a first-ever two-day retreat American to win a Nobel Prize in the sciences, in New Buffalo, MI. We discussed various and the first Physics Department chair at challenges in our department in a leisurely, the University of Chicago. The pioneering low-pressure atmosphere that allowed us work of Michelson is fundamental to the field to make progress on these challenges. This of physics and continues to support new retreat also helped us to bond!! We were discoveries more than a century later. pleased that many family members joined This year we also welcomed back our own lunch and dinner. This was immediately David Saltzberg (Ph.D., 1994) as the followed by a two-day retreat of our women annual Zachariasen lecturer who told of his and gender minority students.
    [Show full text]
  • April 8-11, 2019 the 2019 Franklin Institute Laureates the 2019 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 8–11, 2019
    april 8-11, 2019 The 2019 Franklin Institute Laureates The 2019 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 8–11, 2019 Welcome to The Franklin Institute Awards, the range of disciplines. The week culminates in a grand oldest comprehensive science and technology medaling ceremony, befitting the distinction of this awards program in the United States. Each year, the historic awards program. Institute recognizes extraordinary individuals who In this convocation book, you will find a schedule of are shaping our world through their groundbreaking these events and biographies of our 2019 laureates. achievements in science, engineering, and business. We invite you to read about each one and to attend We celebrate them as modern day exemplars of our the events to learn even more. Unless noted otherwise, namesake, Benjamin Franklin, whose impact as a all events are free and open to the public and located scientist, inventor, and statesman remains unmatched in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. in American history. Along with our laureates, we honor Franklin’s legacy, which has inspired the We hope this year’s remarkable class of laureates Institute’s mission since its inception in 1824. sparks your curiosity as much as they have ours. We look forward to seeing you during The Franklin From shedding light on the mechanisms of human Institute Awards Week. memory to sparking a revolution in machine learning, from sounding the alarm about an environmental crisis to making manufacturing greener, from unlocking the mysteries of cancer to developing revolutionary medical technologies, and from making the world III better connected to steering an industry giant with purpose, this year’s Franklin Institute laureates each reflect Ben Franklin’s trailblazing spirit.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Emergence: Entangling the Universe 1 Leo P. Kadanoff
    Quantum Emergence: Entangling the Universe Leo P. Kadanoff ([email protected]) University of Chicago Perimeter Institute Pitt Emergence October 2015 1 Monday, August 24, 2015 abstract This talk is about emergence as seen by a theoretical physicist. Simply stated, I see an emergent result as any scientific conclusion that is a subtle or unexpected result of the basic postulates of a scientific field. The talk starts by describing some of the ways this can happen. It continues with a detailed discussion of entanglement in quantum mechanics. Quantum entanglement is an idea that was added to the basic quantum theory ten years after that theory was put together in 1924-5. Its impact began to be felt only twenty-five years later with the work of John Bell. Since then the entanglement concept has formed the basis for entire fields of science. For example, it has had a dominating influence on “hard” condensed matter physics. Pitt Emergence October 2015 2 Monday, August 24, 2015 Possible Views of Emergence: I. An Emergent result is anything that surprises the investigator. In 1665, the scientist and clockmaker Christiaan Huygens noticed that two pendulum clocks hanging on a wall tended to synchronize the motion of their pendulums. A similar scenario occurs with two metronomes placed on a piano: they interact through vibrations in the wood and will eventually coordinate their motion. abstract This result is somewhat surprising since the coupling between two clocks or two metronomes is likely to be very weak. abstract Huygens then looked further into his accidental discovery by setting up an experiment to demonstrate the synchronization phenomenon.lab manager The material on Huygens is taken from an unpublished work by Mogens Jensen and LPK.
    [Show full text]
  • Frederick Seitz 1 9 1 1 – 2 0 0 8
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES FREDERICK SEITZ 1 9 1 1 – 2 0 0 8 A Biographical Memoir by CHARLES P. SLICHTER Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 2010 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON, D.C. Courtesy of the Rockefeller Archive Center. FREDERICK SEITZ July 4, 1911–March 2, 2008 BY CHARLES P . SLICHTER REDERICK SEITZ WAS A BRILLIANT SCIENTIST. He was one of the Ffounders of the field that became known as the physics of condensed matter; a wise and insightful leader of academic and scientific organizations; an influential spokesman for science nationally and internationally; a trusted counselor and adviser of many organizations. His contributions to the field of solid-state physics, to the National Academy of Sciences, and to The Rockefeller University were transforma- tive. Ever alert, he used his influence to help many scientists at crucial stages of their careers. He died in New York on March 2, 2008. I met Fred in 1949 when we both joined the faculty of the Department of Physics of the University of Illinois, he as research professor and I as a brand-new Ph.D. with the rank of instructor. Although he was only 8 years old, he was already a famous scientist. He had been elected a member of the American Philosophical Society in 1946, and he was elected a member of the National Academy of Sciences five years later. He was deeply and actively involved in solid-state physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Lecture Series Speakers: 1936 – 2019
    Public Lecture Series Speakers: 1936 – 2019 The Graduate School has been fortunate to host the following speakers as part of the Public Lecture Series. Lecturers on this list are not eligible for the upcoming nomination cycle. Please contact [email protected] with any questions about the nomination process. Signature Speakers Series Menhaz Afridi Maria Hinojosa Donna Shalala Morehshin Allahyari Ralina Joseph Ellen Schur Harry Belafonte Verlaine Keith-Miller Nate Silver Carl Bergstrom Marieka Klawitter Kristen Soltis Anderson Misty Copeland Anthony Leiserowitz Touré Laverne Cox Ulf Leonhardt Jose Antonio Vargas Robin DiAngelo Sharon Maeda Jevin West Junot Díaz Trinh Mai Joy Williamson-Lott Lori Dorfman Peggy McIntosh Tim Wise Adam Drewnowski Megan Ming Francis Kevin Young Ronan Farrow Kathy Najimy Sara Zewde Larry Gossett Emile Pitre Temple Grandin Rogelio Riojas Walker-Ames Scholars Alexander Nagel Kirk Johnson Louis Nirenberg John Beverley Charles Keil Rithy Panh Peter Brewer James Lawson Valerie Smith Ming Cho Lee Samuel NC Lieu Roger Strasser Deborah Dryden Helen Longino Elizabeth Wilson Carole Gassert Philip Kumar Maini Joy James Guiseppe Mazzotta Walker-Ames Lecturers Jeno Adam James Balog George Benedek Julian Agyeman Leonard Barkan Seyla Benhabib Huda Akil George Bartholemew T. Brooke Benjamin Hans Albrecht Bethe Paul Bartlett Margaret Bent Emilio Amero George Batchelor Russell Berman Alexander Archipenko Joseph Beach Howard Bern Kenneth Bailey Hugh Beales Jagdish Bhagwati Bernard Bailyn Arnold Beckett Bhabani Bhattacharya Mieke Bal Jean-Albert Bede Garrett Birkhoff Alan Bittles Alfred Chandler, Jr. Robert Dicke J. Bjerknes Li Chi Liselotte Dieckmann Felix Bloch Brock Chisholm Jean Dieudonne Bruce Blumberg Gustave Choquet Andrea (Andy) DiSessa Larry Bobo Ralph Cicerone Stuart Dodd Christoph Bode Marion Clawson Denis Donoghue Bart Bok Cornell Clayton Sterling Dow Bert Bolin William Clebsch Curt Ducasse Paul Bonifas JM Coetzee John Dunning Gabriel Bonno Philip Cohen J.
    [Show full text]
  • From Clockwork to Crapshoot: a History of Physics
    From Clockwork to Crapshoot a history of physics From Clockwork to Crapshoot a history of physics Roger G. Newton The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts • London, England • 2007 Copyright © 2007 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Newton, Roger G. From clockwork to crapshoot : a history of physics / Roger G. Newton p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN-13: 978–0–674–02337–6 (alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0–674–02337–4 (alk. paper) 1. Physics—History. I. Title. QC7.N398 2007 530.09—dc22 2007043583 To Ruth, Julie, Rachel, Paul, Lily, Eden, Isabella, Daniel, and Benjamin Preface This book is a survey of the history of physics, together with the as- sociated astronomy, mathematics, and chemistry, from the begin- nings of science to the present. I pay particular attention to the change from a deterministic view of nature to one dominated by probabilities, from viewing the universe as running like clockwork to seeing it as a crapshoot. Written for the general scientifically inter- ested reader rather than for professional scientists, the book presents, whenever needed, brief explanations of the scientific issues involved, biographical thumbnail sketches of the protagonists, and descrip- tions of the changing instruments that enabled scientists to discover ever new facts begging to be understood and to test their theories. As does any history of science, it runs the risk of overemphasizing the role of major innovators while ignoring what Thomas Kuhn called “normal science.”To recognize a new experimental or observa- tional fact as a discovery demanding an explanation by a new theory takes a community of knowledgeable and active participants, most of whom remain anonymous.
    [Show full text]