DOCSLIB.ORG

Resetting the Force: the Equipment Challenge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Resetting the Force: the Equipment Challenge C M I have testifi ed now for two years, as we’ve been talking Y Torchbearer K about the supplemental funding required to reset the force National Security Report —it will take us at least two years to reset the force from what we are consuming in this war. General Peter J. Schoomaker Chief of Staff, United States Army in testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee, 30 June 2005 Resetting the Force: The Equipment Challenge Reproduction of this report, in whole or in part, is authorized with appropriate acknowledgment of the source. An AUSA Torchbearer Issue October 2005 3 October 2005 Resetting the force—preparing redeployed Soldiers and their equipment for future missions—reflects how we care for our people and prepare units for upcoming training and deployments while positioning the Army to be more responsive to emerging threats and contingencies. Amidst the constant demands of combat and stability operations, the Army’s equipment is aging far more rapidly than projected. Due to high operational tempos, a harsh environment and limited depot maintenance available in theater, ground and air vehicles in Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom are experiencing usage five to six times greater than expected. Future unit readiness is at risk. To mitigate risk, the Army is taking a series of steps to reverse the stress of combat on equipment as forces redeploy. The program, called Reset, consists not only of repairing and modernizing equipment, replacing battle losses and equipment which are uneconomical to repair, and recapitalizing (to include implementing lessons learned) but also reorganizing into and training on the new brigade-centric modular formations. In this latest edition of AUSA’s signature Torchbearer National Security Report series, we focus our examination on Equipment Reset and the resources it will take to complete it. We hope you find this report a useful resource and that you will continue to look to AUSA for thoughtful, credible analysis of contemporary national security issues. Contents Gordon R. Sullivan Executive Summary........................................... 3 General, U.S. Army Retired Introduction ....................................................... 5 President, AUSA Background........................................................ 6 Current Operations ........................................... 7 Equipment Reset—What Is It?.......................... 9 Replacement of Losses..................................... 9 Recapitalization—Preserving the Life of Current Fleets............................ 11 Repair of Equipment.........................................13 Aviation Reset ................................................. 14 Combat Vehicle Reset .....................................1 5 Additional Reset Concerns...............................1 7 What is Needed................................................1 7 What Must Be Done......................................... 17 Torchbearer Message...................................... 19 2 Executive Summary Resetting the force takes time and funds. Dr. David S. C. Chu, Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) in testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee, 30 June 2005 Major combat and stability operations in Afghanistan This Torchbearer Report focuses primarily on the and Iraq are placing tremendous demands on Soldiers last aspect while outlining a future reset challenge and their equipment. Over the past three years (2003– involving prepositioned stocks. 2005), the Army has deployed more than 40 percent of Despite usage levels five to six times above its equipment to Operations Enduring Freedom (OEF) peacetime expectations and in the midst of an extremely and Iraqi Freedom (OIF). As a result, the Army needs harsh environment, equipment readiness in theater to reset those units by preparing Soldiers and their remains high, above the peacetime goals of 90 percent equipment for future missions. As Army units return for ground equipment and 75 percent for aviation. from deployments, they face significant challenges However, this high in-theater equipment readiness in rebuilding their combat power. This is not new in comes with a price—in this case both monetary and America’s history. What is significant, however, is in terms of impact on the remainder of the Army. the magnitude and length of current operations. The As Army maintainers correctly emphasize in-theater increased operating tempo combined with an already readiness, Army Materiel Command is working to ensure aging fleet and significant combat losses challenge repair parts availability for the entire force worldwide, the Army’s ability to sustain operational availability especially for units preparing to deploy who undergo for its systems. The Reset program is designed to accelerated preparatory training prior to deploying. The reverse the effects of combat stress on the Army’s mission many of these units face in fighting insurgents in Afghanistan and Iraq is different from that for which equipment. the units were initially designed, equipped and trained. The Army resets units forward to the new Reset, then, comprises a series of actions to modular formations—not back to their legacy restore units to a desired level of combat capability designs. Reset is not just equipment-focused; it is: commensurate with mission requirements and • reorganizing returning units into modular unit designs; availability of resources: • retraining essential tasks to incorporate lessons • replacing battle losses and washed out equipment learned from OEF and OIF; (damaged to the degree that repair is not economical); • providing considerable training and professional recapitalizing equipment that needs extensive development for Soldiers and leaders; • refurbishment, implementing lessons learned where • adjusting prepositioned stocks of ammunition and sensible/affordable; and equipment to support the force; and • repairing existing equipment in accordance with • bringing unit readiness back up to Army standards. applicable Army maintenance standards. 3 would be expected. The analysis shows that the effective increase in aging of vehicles deployed to the theater for one calendar year resulted in five years of wear and tear. The resulting stress decreases the remaining useful life of the vehicle.] In addition to the reset of equipment as it returns with units from OEF/OIF, the Army must address the impact of these operations on prepositioned stocks and the equipment that has remained in theater. The Army’s prepositioned stocks from Southwest Asia assets, afloat assets and European assets have been employed in the current conflict. These assets are maintained in theater and are removed from theater to higher-level maintenance only when required. The equipment will require a significant amount of reset following the current conflict; until that The express purpose of Equipment Reset is to equipment is reset, the nation will be accepting risk bring unit equipment to combat-ready condition, in its ability to deploy forces in the time required. either for the unit’s next rotation in support of When the 4th Infantry Division returned from Iraq current operations or for other, unknown future in 2004, it needed to replace, repair or refurbish 71,000 contingencies. The 1st Cavalry Division, for example, pieces of equipment. But it also had to absorb thousands having returned in 2005 from a year-long rotation in Iraq, of newly assigned Soldiers (many directly out of basic/ is resetting itself in anticipation of another deployment, advanced individual training) and to reorganize the perhaps as soon as 2006, and/or to be available for an entire division into a modular force, to include manning unexpected crisis/natural disaster. All of its tanks and and equipping a new 4th Brigade. While supplemental most of its infantry fighting vehicles are in the mainte- appropriations have been critical in fixing current nance shop after operating an average of 5,000 miles per challenges and in addressing some of the lifecycle issues vehicle through dust and heat. that have resulted, additional support is necessary. To complete the Reset program, the Army will require [In 2003, the average age of the Abrams tank fleet increased funding above the baseline budget for at was more than 14 years. These tanks have a design life least two years after hostilities have ceased. of 20 years, with expectation of operating slightly more than 800 miles a year. In OIF, in one year, these tanks Therefore, Congress must: are being driven in excess of 5,000 miles, often on • fund the Department of Defense (DoD) at an hard surfaces as opposed to cross-country, for which amount approximating 4 percent of the Gross Domestic Product; and they were designed. Building on a RAND study, the Army conducted analysis in 2004 and determined • increase the Army’s share of the DoD budget to that the equipment in Iraq was aging much faster than at least 28 percent to meet Army requirements. 4 Resetting the Force: The Equipment Challenge [If operations in Afghanistan and Iraq ended today] it [would] take us at least two years to reset the force. We’re using the equipment three to 10 times more than expected. General Peter J. Schoomaker, Chief of Staff, U.S. Army in testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee, 30 June 2005 Introduction The challenge facing the U.S. Army (and other ability to meet future threats is the absolute requirement services) is daunting: to maintain the operational to rapidly return operational units to an effective readiness
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The National Infantry Museum Customer: Converting from Film to Digital Projection Helps Museum Fulfill Its Mission National Infantry Museum Foundation
    The National Infantry Museum Customer: Converting from film to digital projection helps museum fulfill its mission National Infantry Museum Foundation Location: Columbus, GA Industry/Market: Museums Giant Screen Cinema Partner: D3D Cinema Requirements: • 4K resolution • High quality 3D viewing experience • Lower cost of operation • Reliable, long-term performance • Access to a wide range of digital Soldier trainees enjoy a 3D film at The National Infantry Museum & Soldier Center’s Giant Screen Theater content Photo credit: National Infantry Museum Foundation Summary: The National Infantry Museum From film to digital Foundation looked to upgrade the The National Infantry Museum & Soldier digital content but give it a real ‘wow’ giant screen theater in their National Center’s mission is to honor those who factor—but weren’t sure if it would fit Infantry Museum & Soldier Center serve by telling the stories of 240+ years their budget. from film to digital projection, in of military history. Keeping this history order to more closely align content alive in unforgettable ways helps museum Enter D3D Cinema to their mission, increase revenue visitors—from students of all ages and opportunities, and decrease Boy and Girl Scouts to church groups The Foundation turned to AV industry maintenance and operational costs. and active-duty service members—gain veterans D3D Cinema. With almost 20 a unique insight into what it means to be film-to-digital giant screen conversions a U.S. Army Infantryman. Products: in their portfolio, one of D3D’s founding • One dual-head Christie Solaria principles is to help clients ensure the In its prime, the museum’s film projection CP42LH 6P laser projection system long-term viability of their theaters.
    [Show full text]
  • Projected Acquisition Costs for the Army's Ground Combat Vehicles
    Projected Acquisition Costs for the Army’s Ground Combat Vehicles © MDart10/Shutterstock.com APRIL | 2021 At a Glance The Army operates a fleet of ground combat vehicles—vehicles intended to conduct combat opera- tions against enemy forces—and plans to continue to do so. Expanding on the Army’s stated plans, the Congressional Budget Office has projected the cost of acquiring such vehicles through 2050. Those projections include costs for research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&E) and for procurement but not the costs of operating and maintaining the vehicles. CBO’s key findings are as follows: • Total acquisition costs for the Army’s ground combat vehicles are projected to average about $5 billion per year (in 2020 dollars) through 2050—$4.5 billion for procurement and $0.5 billion for RDT&E. • The projected procurement costs are greater (in constant dollars) than the average annual cost for such vehicles from 2010 to 2019 but approximately equal to the average annual cost from 2000 to 2019 (when spending was boosted because of operations in Iraq). • More than 40 percent of the projected acquisition costs of Army ground combat vehicles are for Abrams tanks. • Most of the projected acquisition costs are for remanufactured and upgraded versions of current vehicles, though the Army also plans to acquire an Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle, which will replace the Bradley armored personnel carrier; an Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle, which will replace the M113 armored personnel carrier; and a new Mobile Protected Firepower tank, which will be lighter than an Abrams tank. • The Army is also considering developing an unmanned Decisive Lethality Platform that might eventually replace Abrams tanks.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Veteranos—Latinos in WWII
    Los Veteranos—Latinos in WWII Over 500,000 Latinos (including 350,000 Mexican Americans and 53,000 Puerto Ricans) served in WWII. Exact numbers are difficult because, with the exception of the 65th Infantry Regiment from Puerto Rico, Latinos were not segregated into separate units, as African Americans were. When war was declared on December 8, 1941, thousands of Latinos were among those that rushed to enlist. Latinos served with distinction throughout Europe, in the Pacific Theater, North Africa, the Aleutians and the Mediterranean. Among other honors earned, thirteen Medals of Honor were awarded to Latinos for service during WWII. In the Pacific Theater, the 158th Regimental Combat Team, of which a large percentage was Latino and Native American, fought in New Guinea and the Philippines. They so impressed General MacArthur that he called them “the greatest fighting combat team ever deployed in battle.” Latino soldiers were of particular aid in the defense of the Philippines. Their fluency in Spanish was invaluable when serving with Spanish speaking Filipinos. These same soldiers were part of the infamous “Bataan Death March.” On Saipan, Marine PFC Guy Gabaldon, a Mexican-American from East Los Angeles who had learned Japanese in his ethnically diverse neighborhood, captured 1,500 Japanese soldiers, earning him the nickname, the “Pied Piper of Saipan.” In the European Theater, Latino soldiers from the 36th Infantry Division from Texas were among the first soldiers to land on Italian soil and suffered heavy casualties crossing the Rapido River at Cassino. The 88th Infantry Division (with draftees from Southwestern states) was ranked in the top 10 for combat effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2017. Issue 01
    FEBRUARY/MARCH 2017. Issue 01. READY FOR WHEREVER YOUR MISSION TAKES YOU ELAMS TOC: The ELAMS TOC Primary mission is to provide effective, reliable space for execution of battlefield C4I. MECC® Shower/Latrine: The AAR MECC® is a fully customizable ISO that allows you to mobilize your mission. SPACEMAX® The SPACEMAX® shelter provides lightweight, durable solutions for rapidly deployable space that reduces costs and risk. 2 armadainternational.com - february/march 2017 MADE IN armadainternational.com - february/march 2017 3 www.AARMobilitySystems.com THE USA FEBRUARY/MARCH 2017 www.armadainternational.com 08 AIR POWER COST VERSUS CREDIBILITY Andrew Drwiega examines maritime patrol aircraft procurement, and the options available for air forces and navies on a budget. 14 20 26 LAND Warfare TURING STIRLING CLASS WAR CATCH-22 VEHICLES FOR CHANGE Stephen W. Miller examines how the designs of Thomas Withington examines the Link-22 tactical Andrew White uncovers some of the latest light armoured vehicles are changing around data link, its workings and what it heralds for advances in vehicle technology to help the world. tomorrow’s naval operations. commandos reach their objectives. 32 38 FUTURE TECHNOLOGIES SEA POWER 44 THE MAN WHO FELL TO EARTH WHAT LIES BENEATH LAND Warfare Parachute technology is over a century old and is Warship definitions are becoming increasingly PREVENTION IS BETTER THAN CURE being continually refined, thanks to advances in blurred due to technological advances. Are we Claire Apthorp explores some of the innovative design and manufacturing, Peter Donaldson moving towards the multipurpose combatant, asks methods being adopted for military vehicle finds out. Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bradley Fighting Vehicle-The Troops Love It Just Like Its Partner-In
    The Bradley Fighting Vehicle-The Troops Love It Just like its partner-in-combat the Ml Abrams tank, the Army's new M2 Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle is rolling off the assembly line in grow­ ing numbers and finding an enthusias­ tic welcome in the units where it is be­ ing assigned. From the battalion com­ manders down to the squad leaders who fight from the Bradley there is high praise for its speed, agility, fire­ power and protection from artillery fragments and small caliber weapons. Also, just like the Abrams tank, the Bradley has been subject to a great deal of uninformed and polemical crit­ icism leading to its current less-than­ optimal press image. In truth, the Bradley, now fielded in 17 battalions, is a very successful piece of equip­ ment. It does what it was intended to do and does it very well. It deserves more objective treatment by the press and other critics who do not under­ stand its function. The Bradley exists to provide infan­ trymen and cavalry scouts a protected fighting platform on the battlefield where they function as partners of a combined-arms team, closely integrat­ ed with tanks, artillery, aviation and air defense weapons. For the first time our infantry soldiers can move into a new dimension-aboard a protective vehicle from which they can fight the enemy, with the firepower, agility and speed which assures continuous effec­ tiveness on a modern battlefield. This is not just a matter of getting the infantry to the battle. It is the de­ mand that infantry and tanks fight to­ gether, that both be there offering their strengths and protecting the oth­ er's weaknesses.
    [Show full text]
  • WWII: European Theater During a Time of War, the Military Uses the Term “Theaters” to Refer to a Specific Geographical Area
    WWII: European Theater During a time of war, the military uses the term “theaters” to refer to a specific geographical area. WWII had two theaters: European and Pacific. The European Theater was broken up into the Western and Eastern Front because the European Theater was so big. Battle/Date What happened? Importance Germany invades Poland, Sept. 1, 1939 -1st use of “Blitzkreig” Beginning of WWII -Polish Army defeat in a matter of weeks -Britain and France declared War on Germany to honor their agreement to protect Poland’s borders Germany invades France, May 10-22, 1940 -3 days after Germany invades Britain is now the only France, the Germans break member of the Allies in through the lines of defense Europe and the invasion also -German Army captures Paris helped strengthen the Nazi -French government agrees to hold over Europe disband Army and turn over all Jews to Germany Battle of Britain, July 1940 -Air Raids by Germany against London & other major cities First defeat of Hitler’s -Germany wanted to destroy the military forces Royal Air Force(RAF) & force Great Britain to surrender -Germany believed they couldn’t carry out an assault on Great Britain until the RAF was taken down Battle of Stalingrad, -Germany invaded the Soviet Turning Point of the Eastern Begins August 1942, Ends Union and bombed the city of Front of the war: Soviet Union February 1943 Stalingrad beings to push Germany back -Soviet Union sent 1 million well supplied soldiers to Stalingrad -Germany moves into city and was unable to receive food and supplies.
    [Show full text]
  • Theater Battle Management Core System: Lessons for Systems Engineers Josiah R
    Theater Battle Management Core System: Lessons for Systems Engineers Josiah R. Collens, Jr. [email protected] Abstract The difficulties encountered during development of the Theater Battle Management Core System (TBMCS) provide lessons for systems engineering of large-scale, software- intensive systems. The absence of formal requirements and oversight, coupled with strong pressure for rapid deployment, caused the program to fail its first operational tests and actually delayed its deployment to the field. The lack of measurable requirements and the need to integrate multiple third-party products and systems made it impossible to establish a system baseline and to test TBMCS in realistic conditions. Thus, significant problems manifested themselves only during official government tests. Moreover, despite nominal authority, the lead contractor had little or no control over the government-furnished elements and commercial off-the- shelf products that TBMCS was to incorporate. Experience with TBMCS leads to several conclusions. First, the more complex a system, the greater the need for rigor and discipline in engineering processes. Second, well- defined requirements are essential. Third, mandating the incorporation of specific third- party hardware or software may create severe problems for system development. Other lessons highlight the importance of open standards in a heterogeneous information technology environment and of layering with well-defined interfaces to facilitate integration and system evolution. Introduction The Theater Battle Management Core System (TBMCS) is an integrated air command and control (C2) system that enables an air component commander to plan, direct, and control all theater air operations and to coordinate with land, maritime, and special operations elements. It encompasses hardware, software, communications links, spares, personnel, training, and other resources.
    [Show full text]
  • BATTLE-SCARRED and DIRTY: US ARMY TACTICAL LEADERSHIP in the MEDITERRANEAN THEATER, 1942-1943 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial
    BATTLE-SCARRED AND DIRTY: US ARMY TACTICAL LEADERSHIP IN THE MEDITERRANEAN THEATER, 1942-1943 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Steven Thomas Barry Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Allan R. Millett, Adviser Dr. John F. Guilmartin Dr. John L. Brooke Copyright by Steven T. Barry 2011 Abstract Throughout the North African and Sicilian campaigns of World War II, the battalion leadership exercised by United States regular army officers provided the essential component that contributed to battlefield success and combat effectiveness despite deficiencies in equipment, organization, mobilization, and inadequate operational leadership. Essentially, without the regular army battalion leaders, US units could not have functioned tactically early in the war. For both Operations TORCH and HUSKY, the US Army did not possess the leadership or staffs at the corps level to consistently coordinate combined arms maneuver with air and sea power. The battalion leadership brought discipline, maturity, experience, and the ability to translate common operational guidance into tactical reality. Many US officers shared the same ―Old Army‖ skill sets in their early career. Across the Army in the 1930s, these officers developed familiarity with the systems and doctrine that would prove crucial in the combined arms operations of the Second World War. The battalion tactical leadership overcame lackluster operational and strategic guidance and other significant handicaps to execute the first Mediterranean Theater of Operations campaigns. Three sets of factors shaped this pivotal group of men. First, all of these officers were shaped by pre-war experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Transformation and Modernization: Overview and Issues for Congress
    Order Code RS20787 Updated March 11, 2004 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Army Transformation and Modernization: Overview and Issues for Congress nae redacted Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary The U.S. Army continues an ambitious program intended to transform itself into a strategically responsive force dominant in all types of ground operations. As planned, its Future Force will eventually meld all ongoing initiatives into a force based on a high- tech Future Combat System (FCS). Its Current Force is beginning to provide a new combat capability, based on current-technology armored vehicles, for the mid-intensity combat operations that seem prevalent in today’s world. Its current “legacy force” of existing systems is being modernized and maintained to ensure effective light and heavy force capabilities until the Future Force is realized. This short report briefly describes the program and discusses issues of feasibility, viability, and affordability of potential interest to Congress. It will be updated as events warrant. Background Modernization is not a new issue or objective for U.S. military forces, but it has taken on new urgency because of: the post-Cold War downsizing and procurement reductions, the new global environment and unexpected requirements, and the promise of a “revolution in military affairs” (RMA) suggested by rapid developments in computers, communications, and guidance systems. The last notable surge in modernization culminated during the “Reagan build-up” of the 1980's. Weapons and doctrines developed and fielded in that era made fundamental contributions to United States successes in the Cold War, the Gulf War, and Kosovo.
    [Show full text]
  • This Index Lists the Army Units for Which Records Are Available at the Eisenhower Library
    DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER LIBRARY ABILENE, KANSAS U.S. ARMY: Unit Records, 1917-1950 Linear feet: 687 Approximate number of pages: 1,300,000 The U.S. Army Unit Records collection (formerly: U.S. Army, U.S. Forces, European Theater: Selected After Action Reports, 1941-45) primarily spans the period from 1917 to 1950, with the bulk of the material covering the World War II years (1942-45). The collection is comprised of organizational and operational records and miscellaneous historical material from the files of army units that served in World War II. The collection was originally in the custody of the World War II Records Division (now the Modern Military Records Branch), National Archives and Records Service. The material was withdrawn from their holdings in 1960 and sent to the Kansas City Federal Records Center for shipment to the Eisenhower Library. The records were received by the Library from the Kansas City Records Center on June 1, 1962. Most of the collection contained formerly classified material that was bulk-declassified on June 29, 1973, under declassification project number 735035. General restrictions on the use of records in the National Archives still apply. The collection consists primarily of material from infantry, airborne, cavalry, armor, artillery, engineer, and tank destroyer units; roughly half of the collection consists of material from infantry units, division through company levels. Although the collection contains material from over 2,000 units, with each unit forming a separate series, every army unit that served in World War II is not represented. Approximately seventy-five percent of the documents are from units in the European Theater of Operations, about twenty percent from the Pacific theater, and about five percent from units that served in the western hemisphere during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit I Spiral Exam – World War II (75 Points Total) PLEASE DO NO
    Mr. Huesken 10th Grade United States History II Unit I Spiral Exam – World War II (75 points total) PLEASE DO NO WRITE ON THIS TEST DIRECTIONS – Please answer the following multiple-choice questions with the best possible answer. No answer will be used more than once. (45 questions @ 1 point each = 45 points) 1) All of the following were leaders of totalitarian governments in the 1930’s and 1940’s except: a. Joseph Stalin b. Francisco Franco. c. Benito Mussolini d. Neville Chamberlain. 2) In what country was the Fascist party and government formed? a. Italy b. Japan c. Spain d. Germany 3) The Battle of Britain forced Germany to do what to their war plans in Europe in 1942? a. Join the Axis powers. b. Fight a three-front war. c. Put off the invasion of Britain. d. Enter into a nonaggression pact with Britain. 4) The Nazis practiced genocide toward Jews, Gypsies, and other “undesirable” peoples in Europe. What does the term “genocide” mean? a. Acting out of anti-Semitic beliefs. b. Deliberate extermination of a specific group of people. c. Terrorizing of the citizens of a nation by a government. d. Killing of people for the express purpose of creating terror. 5) The term “blitzkrieg” was a military strategy that depended on what? a. A system of fortifications. b. Out-waiting the opponent. c. Surprise and quick, overwhelming force. d. The ability to make a long, steady advance. 6) In an effort to avoid a second “world war”, when did the Britain and France adopt a policy of appeasement toward Germany? a.
    [Show full text]
  • The Market for Light Tracked Vehicles
    The Market for Light Tracked Vehicles Product Code #F651 A Special Focused Market Segment Analysis by: Military Vehicles Forecast Analysis 2 The Market for Light Tracked Vehicles 2010 - 2019 Table of Contents Table of Contents .....................................................................................................................................................1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................2 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................3 Trends..........................................................................................................................................................................5 Competitive Environment.......................................................................................................................................6 Market Statistics .......................................................................................................................................................8 Table 1 - The Market for Light Tracked Vehicles Unit Production by Headquarters/Company/Program 2010 - 2019.......................................................11 Table 2 - The Market for Light Tracked Vehicles Value Statistics by Headquarters/Company/Program 2010 - 2019 .......................................................15 Figure
    [Show full text]