DOCSLIB.ORG

British Battleships, 1914-18 2: 2: the Super Dreadnoughts Free

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
British Battleships, 1914-18 2: 2: the Super Dreadnoughts Free FREE BRITISH BATTLESHIPS, 1914-18 2: 2: THE SUPER DREADNOUGHTS PDF Angus Konstam,Paul Wright | 48 pages | 24 Dec 2013 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781780961705 | English | Oxford, United Kingdom British Battleships –18 (2) - Osprey Publishing Possession of modern battleships was not only vital to naval power, but also represented a nation's standing in the world. The Royal Navy at the start of the First World War was the largest navy in the world due, in the most part, to The Naval Defence Act and the two-power standard which called for the navy to maintain a number of battleships at least equal to the British Battleships strength of the next two largest navies. The Royal Navy and the German Imperial Navy did come into contact, notably in the Battle of Jutland[4] but no decisive naval battle came. The inter-war period saw the battleship subjected to strict international limitations to prevent a costly arms race breaking out. This treaty limited the number and size of battleships that each major nation could possess, and required Britain to British Battleships parity with the U. These treaties became effectively obsolete on 1 September at the beginning of Second World War. The treaty limitations meant that fewer new battleships were launched from — than from — The treaties also inhibited development by putting maximum limits on the weights of ships and forced the Royal Navy into compromise designs for the Nelson and King George V classes. Designs like the projected British N3-class battleship continued the trend to larger ships 1914-18 2: 2: The Super Dreadnoughts bigger guns and thicker armour, but never got off the drawing board. Those designs which were commissioned during this period were referred to as treaty battleships. Dreadnought sparked a naval arms race that soon had all the world's major powers building new and bigger warships in her image. Two years later, she resumed her role as flagship of the 4th Squadron, but was moved into the reserve in February and sold for scrap on 9 May Upon commissioning, all three ships were assigned to the 1st division of the Home Fleetlater the 1st Battle Squadronand took part in the Coronation Review for King George V. From 17—20 Julyall three took part in the mobilisation and review of the Royal Navy during the July Crisis following the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand. Bellerophon and Superb joined the Home Fleet but Temeraire did not until Temeraire became a training vessel until decommissioned and scrapped in[35] Bellerophon was made a gunnery ship in March at The Nore and was sold for scrap 8 November and broken up 14 Septemberand Superb relieved Bellerophon as a gunnery training vessel and 1914-18 2: 2: The Super Dreadnoughts served briefly as a target ship before sold for scrapping in December After a lengthy refit in British Battleships, the sisters participated in the mobilisation and British responses to the July Crisis and joined the Home Fleet at Scapa Flow on 22 July The three sisters inflicted little damage, despite firing 98 shots during the battle. In December, she was relieved and then sold for scrap 1 December HMS Neptunethe only ship of her class, was the only battleship constructed during the — Naval Programme, and was the first British battleship to use superfiring 1914-18 2: 2: The Super Dreadnoughts turrets. HMS Neptune was commissioned on 19 January, Neptune was place in the reserve 1 February and sold for scrap in September The two Colossus - class battleships were the final members of the first generation of British dreadnoughts. Upon commission, Colossus and Hercules were both assigned to the 2nd Division, renamed the 2nd Battle Squadron 1 Mayof the Home Fleet and Hercules became its flagship. Colossus was transferred to the 1st Squadron by the end of the year, and Hercules temporarily became a private ship in but later also joined the 1st Squadron. Both ships were present at the surrender of the German fleet at RosythScotland on 21 November, and Hercules took the Allied Naval Armistice Commission British Battleships KielGermanythen joined the Reserve Fleet in February a month after her sister British Battleships had briefly become flagship. Colossus was for a time listed for scrapping, but was then made a boys' training vessel in September and was refitted. Colossus was then returned to the list the following year, but was once again removed and hulked for use by the training establishment HMS Impregnable and was finally sold for scrap in Augustwith Hercules having preceded her on 8 November All four sister ships were assigned to the 2nd Battle Squadron of the Home Fleet upon commission and Orion was named its flagship. The sisters then participated in the Fleet review at Spithead on 9 July and in the mobilisation of the Royal Navy during the July Crisis and following assembly at Scapa Flow. InThunderer and Orion were transformed into training vessels and were sold for scrap the following year in accordance with the Washington Naval Treaty. Monarch was hulked and used for weapons testing until finally sunk in Thundererthe last of the sisters, was sold for scrap in In addition, although the King George V class again retained the two Parsons steam turbines and their four shaftsthey were faster than previous British battleships with a top British Battleships of All four of the King George V -class ships were assigned to the 2nd Battle Squadron on commissionKing George V becoming the Squadron's flagship by 18 FebruaryBritish Battleships Centurion began her career early, accidentally ramming and sinking an Italian steamer with all hands. Into earlythe sisters remained with the 2nd Squadron, until King George V was moved to the 3rd Squadron and then became the flagship of the Reserve Fleet until when the 3rd Squadron was disbanded. She was refitted and reassigned to the 4th Squadron the same year, then in became a gunnery training vessel before finally being sold for scrap in December Ajax met the same fate, but was sold for scrap on 9 November The 1914- 18 2: 2: The Super Dreadnoughts of the King George V -class ships, Centurion was converted into a target ship, but was remilitarised in with light weapons and dummy main guns. On 9 Juneshe was sunk as a block ship to defend a mulberry harbor established on Omaha Beach. In design the sisters were nearly identical to the King George V class1914-18 2: 2: The Super Dreadnoughts the same ten Mk V New for British dreadnoughts, the four Iron Duke -class sisters were fairly separated from each other in their careers. Marlborough 1914-18 2: 2: The Super Dreadnoughts Benbow struggled with poor visibility, the former firing seven salvos at a group of Kaiser -class battleships and the latter firing six salvos, both without effect. After the battle, Marlborough underwent three months of repairs and received increased armour plating, [] [] and Emperor of India rejoined the Home Fleet in the 1st Battle Squadron. In Marchthe Iron Duke -class sisters were assigned to the 4th Battle Squadron with the Mediterranean Fleet to participate in the Allied intervention in the Russian Civil War in the Black Sea[] [] Marlborough even carrying Maria FeodorovnaGrand Duke Nicholasand Prince Yusupov[] and then the sisters served in the Greco-Turkish War until Greece's defeat in the war in[] at which point MarlboroughBenbowand Emperor of India underwent refitting at different ports. Her propulsion means was also unusual for British battleships. In April of the next year, she was sold back to Chile and resumed her original name. The new calibre guns were intended to still give the Royal Navy an advantage in range over newer American and Japanese ships which the Admiralty expected were to be armed with inch guns. Secondary armament was fourteen 6-inch, two 3-inch anti-aircraft and four inch torpedoes tubes. The Revenge class sometimes known as the Royal Sovereign class were designed as a cheaper alternative to the Queen Elizabeth class. Plans had initially been for a class of eight ships, but at the start of the First World War work stopped on all new capital 1914-18 2: 2: The Super Dreadnoughts. The last three ships RenownRepulse and Resistance were cancelled. The first two of these were eventually redesigned as battlecruisers. However, inthis was changed and they became oil-fuelled only. Secondary armament was fourteen 6-inch, two 3-inch anti-aircraft, four 3-pounder guns and four inch torpedoes. Royal Oak was torpedoed at anchor in the supposedly safe harbour of Scapa Flow 1914-18 2: 2: The Super Dreadnoughts after the start of Second World War. The N3, like the contemporary G3-class battlecruiser design, were planned in response to other nations' intentions to build superior navies. The design concentrated the main guns forward of the bridge to reduce weight while allowing very thick armour over the critical parts but they would still be about twice the displacement of predecessors. The design was approved in but in the major naval powers agreed the 1914-18 2: 2: The Super Dreadnoughts Naval Treaty to limit the size and number of warships in their navies. The treaty set an upper limit of 35, tons displacement and inch guns; the ships had not been ordered and no construction had been started. The two ships of British Battleships Nelson class were the only new battleships the Royal Navy were allowed to build under the terms of the Washington Naval Treaty. The layout was based on that of the N3 battleship and G3 battlecruiser but further reduced to come under the weight limit. Nine BL 16 inch Mk I guns — the same as were to have been used on the G3 battlecruisers — were carried in three forward turrets.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Full Spring 2004 Issue the .SU
    Naval War College Review Volume 57 Article 1 Number 2 Spring 2004 Full Spring 2004 Issue The .SU . Naval War College Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Naval War College, The .SU . (2004) "Full Spring 2004 Issue," Naval War College Review: Vol. 57 : No. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol57/iss2/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Naval War College: Full Spring 2004 Issue N A V A L W A R C O L L E G E NAVAL WAR COLLEGE REVIEW R E V I E W Spring 2004 Volume LVII, Number 2 Spring 2004 Spring N ES AV T A A L T W S A D R E C T I O N L L U E E G H E T R I VI IBU OR A S CT MARI VI Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 2004 1 Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen Naval War College Review, Vol. 57 [2004], No. 2, Art. 1 Cover A Landsat-7 image (taken on 27 July 2000) of the Lena Delta on the Russian Arctic coast, where the Lena River emp- ties into the Laptev Sea. The Lena, which flows northward some 2,800 miles through Siberia, is one of the largest rivers in the world; the delta is a pro- tected wilderness area, the largest in Rus- sia.
    [Show full text]
  • 000008A0.Pdf
    A EVOLUÇÃO TECNOLÓGICA NO SETOR NAVAL NA SEGUNDA METADE DO SÉCULO XIX E AS CONSEQÜÊNCIAS PARA A Marinha do brasil* ARMANDO AMORIM FERREIRA VIDIGAL Vice-Almirante (ReP) SUMÁRIO Introdução A propulsão mista: Da roda ao hélice A Guerra da Crimcia e suas lições A Guerra da Secessão Norte-Americana A Guerra da Tríplice Aliança A Guerra Austro-Prussiana - A Batalha de Lisa A Guerra da Tríplice Aliança Continua A Guerra Franco-Prussiana Acirra-se o duelo couraça x canhão As torpedeiras com tubos axiais A Guerra Chile-Peru Os Cruzadores A evolução da pólvora Ação francesa contra chineses "Jeune A École" A Guerra Estados Unidos x Espanha O Submarino de casco duplo A Guerra Russo-Japonesa A guerra de minas A Batalha do Mar Amarelo A Batalha de Tsushima O Aparecimento do Dreadnought N-R.: O extenso uso do negrito foi para chamar atenção dos diversos tópicos analisados, c que não mereciam Um subtítulo. KMB4ÜT72000131 INTRODUÇÃO armada com a do Chile e a da República da Argentina. Um confronto há pouco esboça- fim da Guerra do Paraguai (1864-70), a do pelo jornal mais influente deste último Ao Marinha Brasil do era, sem nenhuma país,/4 Prensa, de Buenos Aires, opõe a cada dúvida, significativa, só sendo superada, em um de nossos vasos de guerra hoje válidos número de bocas de fogo, pelas Marinhas da um competidor formidável, deixando, ainda, Inglaterra, Rússia, Estado Unidos e Itália, nas sombras, com que compor mais de uma nessa ordem. Poucos anos mais tarde, a Esquadra, capaz de medir-se com nossa. Marinha nacional não tinha ex- Deus nos as já qualquer dê por muitos anos paz com militar.
    [Show full text]
  • {TEXTBOOK} British Battlecruisers: 1905
    BRITISH BATTLECRUISERS: 1905 - 1920 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK John Roberts | 128 pages | 04 Oct 2016 | Pen & Sword Books Ltd | 9781473882355 | English | Barnsley, United Kingdom British Battlecruisers, – | Bookshare Monarch was hulked and used for weapons testing until finally sunk in Thunderer , the last of the sisters, was sold for scrap in In addition, although the King George V class again retained the two Parsons steam turbines and their four shafts , they were faster than previous British battleships with a top speed of All four of the King George V -class ships were assigned to the 2nd Battle Squadron on commission , King George V becoming the Squadron's flagship by 18 February , but Centurion began her career early, accidentally ramming and sinking an Italian steamer with all hands. Into early , the sisters remained with the 2nd Squadron, until King George V was moved to the 3rd Squadron and then became the flagship of the Reserve Fleet until when the 3rd Squadron was disbanded. She was refitted and reassigned to the 4th Squadron the same year, then in became a gunnery training vessel before finally being sold for scrap in December Ajax met the same fate, but was sold for scrap on 9 November The last of the King George V -class ships, Centurion was converted into a target ship, but was remilitarised in with light weapons and dummy main guns. On 9 June , she was sunk as a block ship to defend a mulberry harbor established on Omaha Beach. In design the sisters were nearly identical to the King George V class , bearing the same ten Mk V New for British dreadnoughts, the four Iron Duke -class sisters were fairly separated from each other in their careers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anglo-German Naval Arms Race, 1906-1916
    Middle States Geographer, 2012, 45: 84-89 FROM INNOVATION TO IMPASSE: THE ANGLO-GERMAN NAVAL ARMS RACE, 1906-1916 Darrell A. Norris Department of Geography S.U.N.Y. College at Geneseo Geneseo, NY 14454 ABSTRACT: Weapons systems’ common compromise of offensive power, defensive protection, and mobility was expressed as a sensational innovation in naval architecture with the completion of HMS Dreadnought in 1906, when Great Power rivalry guaranteed an ensuing arms race. The latter entailed steady improvements of power, protection, and propulsion, all requiring a larger and more costly platform to incorporate even slight advantages. The large dreadnought fleets built by Britain and Germany incorporated few improvements in tactics, command and control. Lengthening big gun ranges exceeded their limits of effectiveness, and hit rates at long range fell to 3 percent or less, yielding probable stalemate other than the destruction of obsolete vessel types and vulnerable hybrids. Advances in destructive power, protection, and speed led inexorably to the increased size and cost of capital ships, climaxed by their inconclusive clash at Jutland in 1916. As a weapon system, the battleship was necessarily modified to cope with air and undersea attack, with imperfect success. Such new vulnerabilities for the battleship echoed the denouement of French armored and mounted knights by English archers and men-at-arms at Agincourt. Perfect weapon symmetry and its related spatial deployment are apt to be transitory phenomena in the practice of modern warfare. Keywords: naval history, arms race In Ancient Greece, the Olympic wrestler already represented a long-outdated and intentionally ritualized form of combat, one with no added protection, strength, or range of movement independent of human anatomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Stalin's Big-Fleet Program
    Naval War College Review Volume 57 Article 6 Number 2 Spring 2004 Stalin’s Big-Fleet Program Milan L. Hauner Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Hauner, Milan L. (2004) "Stalin’s Big-Fleet Program," Naval War College Review: Vol. 57 : No. 2 , Article 6. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol57/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hauner: Stalin’s Big-Fleet Program STALIN’S BIG-FLEET PROGRAM Milan L. Hauner The Party is in favor of small submarines with a short range. You can build three times as many submarines for your money as big ones.... but the actual problem lay in a quite different sphere. Big submarines mean a policy of aggression, to further world revolution. Small sub- marines mean coastal defense—that is, self-defense, and postponement of world revolution. ARTHUR KOESTLER his is the answer that in Koestler’s famous 1941 novel Darkness at Noon the Tpolice investigator Ivanov gives the accused Rubashov, who asked him why a certain admiral had to be executed. “The times are against us,”Ivanov continues; “we are in the hollow of a wave and must wait until we are lifted by the next.”His explanation suggests what actual Soviet naval strategy Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Us Navy Dreadnoughts 1914–45
    US NAVY DREADNOUGHTS 1914–45 RYAN K. NOPPEN ILLUSTRATED BY PAUL WRIGHT © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com NEW VANGUARD 208 US NAVY DREADNOUGHTS 1914–45 RYAN K. NOPPEN © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 THE SOUTH CAROLINA CLASS 7 t South Carolina Class Specifications THE DELAWARE AND FLORIDA CLASSES 10 t Delaware Class Specifications t Florida Class Specifications WYOMING CLASS 15 t Wyoming Class Specifications NEW YORK CLASS 18 t New York Class Specifications US DREADNOUGHT BATTLESHIP OPERATIONS 1914–18 20 t The Veracruz Occupation t World War I INTERWAR SCRAPPING, DISARMAMENT AND MODERNIZATION 34 US DREADNOUGHT BATTLESHIP OPERATIONS 1939–45 35 t Neutrality Patrols t Actions in the European Theater t Actions in the Pacific Theater CONCLUSION 45 BIBLIOGRAPHY 46 INDEX 48 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com US NAVY DREADNOUGHTS 1914–45 INTRODUCTION The United States was the second of the great naval powers to embrace the concept of the all-big-gun dreadnought battleship in the early 20th century. The US Navy was seen as an upstart by much of the international community, after it experienced a rapid increase in strength in the wake of the Spanish- American War. American naval expansion paralleled that of another upstart naval power, Germany, whose navy also saw meteoric growth in this period. What is little known is that a tacit naval arms race developed in the late 19th and early 20th centuries between these two powers, due primarily to soured foreign relations caused by a rivalry over colonial territory in the Pacific and an economic rivalry in Latin America.
    [Show full text]
  • Victory at Sea in World War One by Scott Elaurant© January 2008
    Victory at Sea in World War One By Scott Elaurant© January 2008 Introduction This is intended as an expansion to the Victory at Sea game for World War One battles. British Royal Navy and German High Seas Fleets ship statistics are listed, including most ships that fought at the Battle of Jutland. Ship Special Rules Limited Submersible – World War One submarines were only able to dive for shorter periods and stayed at shallow depths. If they are spotted at periscope depth they may be rammed. If a World War One submarine with this feature attempts to fire a torpedo, on that turn or the turn after enemy ships may sink it by ramming. Move the ramming vessel into contact with the submarine. Roll the attacking vessels to hit number or higher (+1 if ramming from side) to sink the submarine. The submarine also rolls against its to hit number. If it rolls a hit the submarine is also sunk, but one point of damage (no save) is done to the ship as well. Vulnerable Magazines – These ships have either weak turret top armour or lack magazine fire protection. Any critical hit resulting in a Weapons hit causes a Magazine Explosion on a roll of 4 to 6 for ships with this rule. This does not apply if the enemy weapon is rated as “weak”. Points System for World war One This point system is designed to balance Victory at Sea games for World War One Ships. It still assumes that the same level system will operate. The points per side players may have to spend will be up to the following limits for each level of game: Game Level Points Total Patrol 50 Skirmish 75 Raid 100 Battle 150 War 300 • Players may only select a fleet consisting of five different choices of types of ships, submarines or aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • British Battleships of World War One Free
    FREE BRITISH BATTLESHIPS OF WORLD WAR ONE PDF R. A. Burt | 344 pages | 25 Oct 2012 | Pen & Sword Books Ltd | 9781848321472 | English | Barnsley, United Kingdom List of battleships of World War II - Wikipedia He visualised a new breed of warship with the armament of a battleship, but faster, lighter, and less heavily armoured. The first three battlecruisers, British Battleships of World War One Invincible classwere laid down while Dreadnought was being built in This British Battleships of World War One philosophy was most successful in action British Battleships of World War One the battlecruisers could use their speed to run down smaller and weaker ships. All three ships were destroyed by more heavily armoured German battlecruisers, [3] with the British failure to prevent fires or explosions in the gun turrets from reaching the magazines also playing a role in the losses. Following the war, the British planned to build the G3 classwhich had the same armament and armour as battleships of the time and were rated as battlecruisers only by comparison to the more heavily armoured and slower battleships also planned. They were cancelled as they exceeded the tonnage limits of the Washington Naval Treaty. The three Courageous -class ships were converted to aircraft carriers during the s and only RepulseRenown and Hood served in the Second World War as battlecruisers. All three went through substantial refits between the wars. Hood was lost in the battle of the Denmark StraitRepulse was sunk by Japanese aircraft at the start of the war in the Pacificand Renown survived the war to be scrapped in The Invincible -class ships were British Battleships of World War One first battlecruisers [Note 1] in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Us Fast Battleships 1936-47: the North Carolina and South Dakota Classes Pdf
    FREE US FAST BATTLESHIPS 1936-47: THE NORTH CAROLINA AND SOUTH DAKOTA CLASSES PDF Lawrence Burr,Tony Bryan | 48 pages | 23 Nov 2010 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781846035104 | English | Oxford, England, United Kingdom South Dakota-class battleship () - Wikipedia Uh-oh, it looks like your Internet Explorer is out of date. For a better shopping experience, please upgrade now. Javascript is not enabled in your browser. Enabling JavaScript in your browser will allow you to experience all the features of our site. Learn how to enable JavaScript on your browser. NOOK Book. Home 1 Books 2. Read an excerpt of this book! Add to Wishlist. Sign in to Purchase Instantly. Members save with free shipping everyday! See details. Overview This volume details the design, construction, and operation of the first six of the ten US fast battleships, two of the North Carolina class and four of the South Dakota class. These six battleships were all authorized in and were the first vessels built in the US since Consequently, these ships benefitted from enormous technological leaps, with improvements in ship design, power, armor, armament and the single most important improvement the use of radar guided fire control helping to change the course of the war in the Pacific. Packed with first-hand accounts, battle reports, and specially created artwork this book tells the story of these war-winning vessels. About the Author Lawrence Burr has had a lifelong passion for naval history. He was recently the British specialist on a Channel 4 documentary about the battle of Jutland. He has also been part of a team who has conducted US Fast Battleships 1936-47: The North Carolina and South Dakota Classes explorations of the Battlecruiser wrecks and has visited a number of the key battleships detailed in this volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Battlecruisers at Jutland: a Comparative Analysis of British And
    Battlecruisers at Jutland: A Comparative Analysis of British and German Warship Design and its Impact on the Naval War A Senior Honors Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for graduation with research distinction in the undergraduate colleges of The Ohio State University by Nathanial G. Ott The Ohio State University July 2010 Project Advisor: Professor John F. Guilmartin, Department of History 1 Introduction The two most powerful battle fleets in the world—the British Grand Fleet and the German High Seas Fleet—departed their bases for what would become the largest naval battle of the First World War on 30 and 31 May 1916, respectively.1 The German fleet had previously conducted a series of raids on the eastern British coast in an attempt to lure out a portion of the numerically superior Grand Fleet and destroy it.2 The British, however, had acquired the primary German naval code book in 1914 from the cruiser SMS Magdeburg, after it ran aground in the Gulf of Finland and was captured by the Russian navy.3 The ability to intercept and decrypt German radio traffic provided the British with valuable early warnings of major fleet actions. Aware that the German fleet was to sail on the 31st on yet another such raid, the British decided to sortie their fleet a day early in order to be in position to cut off their opponent from its bases in Germany.4 The main German fleet was composed of 16 dreadnought battleships and six pre- dreadnought battleships under the command of Vice Admiral Reinhard Scheer.5 A scouting force of five battlecruisers,6 commanded by Rear Admiral Franz von Hipper, screened the battle fleet.7 The main British fleet, commanded by Admiral John Jellicoe, consisted of 24 dreadnoughts and three battlecruisers.
    [Show full text]
  • British First-Class Cruiser Development 1884 – 1909
    The Genesis of a Cruiser Navy: British First-Class Cruiser Development 1884 – 1909 By Scott M. Lindgren Being a thesis submitted for the qualification of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) at the University of Salford School of Humanities, Languages and Social Sciences 2013 Abstract From the middle of the 1880s until the commencement of the Great War 1914-’18 the first-class cruiser was an vital component of the British battlefleet. This was a period in which technology and tactics evolved at an extremely rapid pace, forming the material basis for Sir John Fisher’s ‘Dreadnought Revolution’, in which cruiser qualities of speed, range and offensive power were greatly prized. Throughout this era enormous sums were spent on such types: they were frequently longer than and cost almost as much as their battleship contemporaries, while carrying a near-equivalent armament and possessing significant advantages in both speed and endurance. Despite these capabilities, British first-class cruisers, especially those of the 1890s, are comparatively rarely examined by historians. This thesis fills the gap in the historiography by examining the place and development of the type in the Royal Navy from 1884-1909, and illustrates how they would progress from being a trade-defence vessel, to a genuine alternative to the battleship, and would ultimately form the basic inspiration for all of the service’s first all-big-gun capital ships. It begins by assessing the origins of the type in the mid-Victorian era and considers how the contemporary strategic position and materials drove vessel characteristics, resulting in the development of the first unofficially termed ‘battle-cruisers’ to counter the threat of a Franco-Russian guerre de course employing dedicated raiding types and armed high- speed liners.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Navy and the Dreadnought Revolution
    ..... 1...._.~111~1111111 THE UNITED STATES NAVY AND THE DREADNOUGHT REVOLUTION: AN HISTORICAL CRITIQUE OF THE CAPITAL SHIP THEORY OF SEAPOWER By JEFFREY MICHAEL McKEAGE \\ Bachelor of Arts University of Southern Maine Portland, Maine 1980 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of f'1ASTER OF ARTS May, 1987 ~----- ,v·~~.Ji 0 MA s,._ fa+:- ~/. UNIVERSITY «' LIBRARY THE UNITED STATES NAVY AND THE REVOLUTION: AN HISTORICAL CRITIQUE OF THE CAPITAL SHIP THEORY OF SEAPOWER Thesis Approved: Dean of the Graduate College ii 127~689 PREFACE In the winter of 1889-90, Secretary of the Navy Benjamin Franklin Tracy altered the basic naval strategy of the United States, a change unique in American history. Since the Revolutionary War the Navy had been devoted to protecting the coasts and raiding ene.rny co.rn.rnerce, although the emphasis of this policy had varied. In the ·1aaos a group of young naval officers, who advocated a fleet in the style of the European powers, advanced to co.rn.rnand ranks. Two of their leaders, Admiral Stephen B. Luce and Captain Alfred Thayer Mahan, convinced Tracy to begin the con­ struction of a squadron of American capital ships, a course last seriously contemplated during the War of ·15·12. ·1 Since that winter, the capital ship has evolved fro.rn battleships and armored cruisers to nuclear aircraft carriers and ballistic .missile submarines, but American naval policy has remained firmly centered on the battlefleet. The complete victory of Tracy's battleships at the Battle of Santiago apparently vindicated this new policy, but only seven years later, the Navy's unwavering adherence to the capital ship strategy caused it to become increas­ ingly impotent as a consideration in international strat- egy.
    [Show full text]