DOCSLIB.ORG

Us Fast Battleships 1936-47: the North Carolina and South Dakota Classes Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Us Fast Battleships 1936-47: the North Carolina and South Dakota Classes Pdf FREE US FAST BATTLESHIPS 1936-47: THE NORTH CAROLINA AND SOUTH DAKOTA CLASSES PDF Lawrence Burr,Tony Bryan | 48 pages | 23 Nov 2010 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781846035104 | English | Oxford, England, United Kingdom South Dakota-class battleship () - Wikipedia Uh-oh, it looks like your Internet Explorer is out of date. For a better shopping experience, please upgrade now. Javascript is not enabled in your browser. Enabling JavaScript in your browser will allow you to experience all the features of our site. Learn how to enable JavaScript on your browser. NOOK Book. Home 1 Books 2. Read an excerpt of this book! Add to Wishlist. Sign in to Purchase Instantly. Members save with free shipping everyday! See details. Overview This volume details the design, construction, and operation of the first six of the ten US fast battleships, two of the North Carolina class and four of the South Dakota class. These six battleships were all authorized in and were the first vessels built in the US since Consequently, these ships benefitted from enormous technological leaps, with improvements in ship design, power, armor, armament and the single most important improvement the use of radar guided fire control helping to change the course of the war in the Pacific. Packed with first-hand accounts, battle reports, and specially created artwork this book tells the story of these war-winning vessels. About the Author Lawrence Burr has had a lifelong passion for naval history. He was recently the British specialist on a Channel 4 documentary about the battle of Jutland. He has also been part of a team who has conducted US Fast Battleships 1936-47: The North Carolina and South Dakota Classes explorations of the Battlecruiser wrecks and has visited a number of the key battleships detailed in this volume. He lives in the USA. Related Searches. Behold the Rolling Stones: run-ins with the law, chart-topping successes, and now the World's Greatest On July 12,London's Marquee Club View Product. Anzio The beleaguered beachhead. In Januarythe Allies decided to land at Anzio in order to overcome the In Januarythe Allies decided to land at Anzio in order to US Fast Battleships 1936-47: The North Carolina and South Dakota Classes the stalemate at Cassino. This amphibious landing has become one of the most controversial campaigns of World War II Questionable decisions by the Allied leadership led Austro-Hungarian Battleships Despite imperial politics, a modern Austro-Hungarian battleship fleet was built and contested Italian dominance of Despite imperial politics, a modern Austro-Hungarian battleship fleet was built and contested Italian dominance of the Adriatic and the Mediterranean through a series of daring naval raids that netted greater success than anything the German High Seas Fleet accomplished in Bell X Even before the spectacular success of its X-1 rocket-powered aircraft in breaking the sound barrier, Even before the spectacular success of its X-1 rocket-powered aircraft in breaking the sound barrier, the adventurous Bell Aircraft Corporation was already pushing ahead with a parallel project to build a second aircraft capable of far higher speeds. The X Bolt Action: Armies of France and the Allies. World War II was truly a 'world' war, and many nations joined the fight against World War II was US Fast Battleships 1936-47: The North Carolina and South Dakota Classes a 'world' war, and many nations joined the fight against Germany and the Axis. Landing Craft, Infantry and Fire Support. Described by one soldier as a metal box designed by a sadist to move soldiers Described by one soldier as a metal box designed by a sadist to move soldiers across the water, the Landing Craft, Infantry was a large beaching craft intended to transport and deliver an infantry rifle company to a hostile shore, Northrop Flying Wings. With original artwork and rarely seen photos, Northrop Flying Wings is an invaluable resource about With original artwork and rarely seen photos, Northrop Flying Wings is an invaluable resource about some of the most remarkable aircraft ever flown. World US Fast Battleships 1936-47: The North Carolina and South Dakota Classes II brought a need for very long-range bombers and Northrop received a contract for a Peckuwe The Revolutionary War on the Ohio. As the Revolutionary War raged on fields near the Atlantic, Native Americans and British rangers fought American settlers on the Ohio River frontier in warfare of unsurpassed ferocity. When their attacks threatened to drive the Americans from their settlements in Bloomsbury USA. New Vanguard US Fast Battleships –47 - Osprey Publishing They were the second class of battleships to be named after the 40th state ; US Fast Battleships 1936-47: The North Carolina and South Dakota Classes first were designed in the s and canceled under the terms of the Washington Naval Treaty. The ships can be visually distinguished from the earlier vessels by their single funnel, compared to twin funnels in the North Carolina s. According to naval historians William Garzke and Robert Dulin, the South Dakota design was the best " treaty battleship " ever built. Commissioning through the summer ofthe four ships served in both the Atlantic, ready to intercept possible German capital ship sortiesand the Pacific, in carrier groups and shore bombardments. The preceding two North Carolina -class battleships had been assigned to the FY building program, and inthe General Board met to discuss the two battleships to be allocated to FY Standleythe Chief of Naval Operationswanted the ships to be of a new design. That meant construction could not begin byso the ships were assigned to FY Design work started in March and the draft for two battleships was formally approved by the Secretary of the Navy on 23 June. More specific characteristics for the two ships were ironed out, and those were approved on 4 January The ships were formally ordered on 4 April Due to the deteriorating international situations in Europe and Asia, Congress authorized a further two battleships of the new design, for a total of four, under the Deficiency Authorization of 25 June Navy so it could begin work on the follow-on Iowa -class battleshipsbut Congress was willing to approve only the 35,ton battleships. The North Carolina s also did not have sufficient space to act as fleet flagshipsso the lead ship of the new class was designed with an extra deck on the conning tower specifically for this purpose, US Fast Battleships 1936-47: The North Carolina and South Dakota Classes the increase in space and weight from this necessitated removal of two twin 5-in DP mounts. There was a great deal of debate on the requirements for the new battleships. The belt armor was a much more intractable problem; the inch gun could penetrate To proof the ship against her own armament—a characteristic known as "balanced armor"—the main belt would have to be increased to US Fast Battleships 1936-47: The North Carolina and South Dakota Classes mitigate this problem, sloped armor was proposed; it was infeasible to use inclined armor in an external belt, because it would compromise stability to a dangerous degree. Instead, an internal armor belt was constructed behind unarmored hull plates. This had serious drawbacks, however; it complicated the construction process, and if the armored belt was damaged, the external plating would have to be cut away first before the belt could be repaired. To minimize the drawbacks of the inclined belt, it sloped outward from the keelthen back in towards the armored deck. This meant that shells fired at relatively close range would hit the upper portion of the belt at an angle, which maximized armor protection. However, the effectiveness of the upper portion of the belt was degraded at longer ranges, because plunging fire would strike it at an angle closer to the perpendicular, increasing their ability to penetrate the armor. It did reduce the area that needed to be covered by the armored deck, which saved additional weight. This enabled the upper belt to be thicker, which to an extent ameliorated the vulnerability to plunging fire. Ultimately, the complex double incline belt armor was abandoned when it became apparent that a single slanted belt could provide similar protection, and save several hundred tons of weight. The size of the hull was also a problem: a longer hull generally equates to a higher top speed, but requires more armor to protect it. In order to keep a higher top speed on a shorter hull, higher-performance machinery is required. The design initially called for a top speed of at least To counter this, it was determined a top speed of between In order to do so the boilers were positioned directly above the turbines in the same arrangement to have been used in the Lexington -class battlecruisers. The boilers were then rearranged several times so they were staggered with the turbines, eventually ending directly alongside the turbines. The propulsion system was arranged as close together as possible, and the evaporators and distilling equipment were placed in the machinery rooms. This provided enough additional space behind the armored belt to add a second plotting room. However, in case of rejection by the General Board, naval architects produced a series of alternatives. The primary ft design was the only plan that could meet the specified requirements for speed, protection, and the nine inch guns. This ultimate insistence on speed presaged the development of the next generation of battleships, the largest, fastest, and final built by the U. Navy, the Iowa class:. The hull featured a bulbous bow, triple bottom under the armored citadel, and skegscharacteristics shared by all American fast battleships.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • US COLD WAR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS Forrestal, Kitty Hawk and Enterprise Classes
    US COLD WAR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS Forrestal, Kitty Hawk and Enterprise Classes BRAD ELWARD ILLUSTRATED BY PAUL WRIGHT © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com NEW VANGUARD 211 US COLD WAR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS Forrestal, Kitty Hawk and Enterprise Classes BRAD ELWARD ILLUSTRATED BY PAUL WRIGHT © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 ORIGINS OF THE CARRIER AND THE SUPERCARRIER 5 t World War II Carriers t Post-World War II Carrier Developments t United States (CVA-58) THE FORRESTAL CLASS 11 FORRESTAL AS BUILT 14 t Carrier Structures t The Flight Deck and Hangar Bay t Launch and Recovery Operations t Stores t Defensive Systems t Electronic Systems and Radar t Propulsion THE FORRESTAL CARRIERS 20 t USS Forrestal (CVA-59) t USS Saratoga (CVA-60) t USS Ranger (CVA-61) t USS Independence (CVA-62) THE KITTY HAWK CLASS 26 t Major Differences from the Forrestal Class t Defensive Armament t Dimensions and Displacement t Propulsion t Electronics and Radars t USS America, CVA-66 – Improved Kitty Hawk t USS John F. Kennedy, CVA-67 – A Singular Class THE KITTY HAWK AND JOHN F. KENNEDY CARRIERS 34 t USS Kitty Hawk (CVA-63) t USS Constellation (CVA-64) t USS America (CVA-66) t USS John F. Kennedy (CVA-67) THE ENTERPRISE CLASS 40 t Propulsion t Stores t Flight Deck and Island t Defensive Armament t USS Enterprise (CVAN-65) BIBLIOGRAPHY 47 INDEX 48 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com US COLD WAR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS FORRESTAL, KITTY HAWK AND ENTERPRISE CLASSES INTRODUCTION The Forrestal-class aircraft carriers were the world’s first true supercarriers and served in the United States Navy for the majority of America’s Cold War with the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrodynamic Design of Integrated Bulbous Bowlsonar Dome for Naval Ships
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Defence Science Journal Defence Science Journal, Vol. 55, No. I, January 2005, pp. 21-36 O 2005, DESIDOC Hydrodynamic Design of Integrated Bulbous Bowlsonar Dome for Naval Ships R. Sharma and O.P. Sha Indian Institute of Technology Khnragpur, Khnragpur-721 302 ABSTRACT Recently, the idea of bulbous bow has been extended from the commercial ships to the design of an integrated bow that houses a sonar dome for naval ships. In the present study, a design method for a particular set of requirements consisting of a narrow range of input parameters is presented. The method uses an approximate linear theory with sheltering effect for resistance estimation and pressure distribution, and correlation with statistical analysis from the existing literature and the tank-test results available in the public domain. Though the optimisation of design parameters has been done for the design speed, but the resistance performance over the entire speed range has been incorporated in the design. The bulb behaviour has been discussed using the principle of minimisation of resistance and analysis of flow pattern over the bulb and near the sonar dome. It also explores the possible benefits arising out of new design from the production, acoustic, and hydrodynamic point of view. The results of this study are presented in the form of design parameters (for the bulbous bow) related to the main hull parameters for a set of input data in a narrow range. Finally, the method has been used to design the bulbous bow for a surface combatant vessel.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulbous Bow Design Optimization for Fast Ships
    BULBOUS BOW DESIGN OPTIMIZATION FOR FAST SHIPS by GEORGIOS KYRIAZIS B.S. Marine Engineering Hellenic Naval Academy, 1988 Submitted to the Department of Ocean Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Naval Engineer and Master of Science in Ocean Systems Management at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 1996 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1996. All rights reserved AAuthor..... uthor .......................................................................-...- - ,.......................... Department of Ocean Engineering May 10, 1996 C ertified by ........................................................ ......." .......... .:....: ...... Paul D. Sclavounos, Professor of Naval Architecture Thesi-Supervior, )epartment of Ocean Engineering Certified by ..................................................... Alan J. Brown, Wofessor of Naval Construction and Engineering Thesis Reader, Department of Ocean Engineering A ccepted by .............................................. ......... Douglas A. Carmichael, P~ofessor of Power Engineering , oFiT CrA.urjN)o,•o Chairman, Ocean Engineering Departmental Graduate Committee JUL 2 6 1996 ,n LIBRARIES BULBOUS BOW DESIGN OPTIMIZATION FOR FAST SHIPS by GEORGIOS KYRIAZIS Submitted to the department of Ocean Engineering on May 10, 1996 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degrees of Naval Engineer and Master of Science in Ocean Systems Management. ABSTRACT Using the TGC-770, a fine-form, high-speed vessel, as the reference hull form, a series of variant hull forms with bulbous bows was designed. These variants were analyzed hydrodynamically utilizing the code SWAN, in order to investigate the effects of changes in bulb parameters on the total calm water resistance and seakeeping performance of the original TGC-770 original hull form. The wave resistance coefficients calculated by SWAN were combined with model test results to estimate the total calm water resistance for all hull forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Consider Inverted Bows on Military Ships Or Why
    ATMA 2018 WHY CONSIDER INVERTED BOWS ON MILITARY SHIPS? OR WHY NOT ? Philippe GOUBAULT Naval Group – Direction of Innovation and Technical Expertise – Bouguenais (France) Stéphane LE PALLEC, Yann FLOCH Naval Group – Surface Ship Design Department – Lorient (France) SOMMAIRE La forme des étraves des navires a connu de nombreuses évolutions au cours de l’histoire de la construction navale. Ces évolutions suivent en général l’avènement de nouveaux besoins ou de nouvelles connaissances. L’industrie navale est cependant très conservatrice, ce qui tend à ralentir des évolutions significatives. Ceci s’applique en particulier au cas des étraves discutées dans ce papier. Dans les dernières 50 -70 ans, ce qui est assez court dans l’échelle de l’histoire, les étraves des navires ont évolué pour intégrer un dévers assez important afin de mieux surmonter les vagues lors d’opérations sur mer forte. L’action de ces étraves tend à disperser les embruns sur les côtés et produire des forces de rappel afin d’éviter l’enfournement de l’avant sous la vague. Cela a marqué une amélioration par rapport aux étraves assez droites des navires avant cette période. On assiste cependant depuis le début des années 90 à une recrudescence des designs de navires avec des étraves droites ou inversées. Il est légitime de se demander ce que cela apporte et quel risque prend on le cas échéant en adoptant ce changement. Naval Group s’est lancé depuis une dizaine d’année dans un programme complet d’études et d’essais afin de déterminer l’intérêt et les conditions de succès d’un design avec une étrave inversée.
    [Show full text]
  • Shokaku Class, Zuikaku, Soryu, Hiryu
    ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF KOJINSHA No.6 ‘WARSHIPS OF THE IMPERIAL JAPANESE NAVY’ SHOKAKU CLASS SORYU HIRYU UNRYU CLASS TAIHO Translators: - Sander Kingsepp Hiroyuki Yamanouchi Yutaka Iwasaki Katsuhiro Uchida Quinn Bracken Translation produced by Allan Parry CONTACT: - [email protected] Special thanks to my good friend Sander Kingsepp for his commitment, support and invaluable translation and editing skills. Thanks also to Jon Parshall for his work on the drafting of this translation. CONTENTS Pages 2 – 68. Translation of Kojinsha publication. Page 69. APPENDIX 1. IJN TAIHO: Tabular Record of Movement" reprinted by permission of the Author, Colonel Robert D. Hackett, USAF (Ret). Copyright 1997-2001. Page 73. APPENDIX 2. IJN aircraft mentioned in the text. By Sander Kingsepp. Page 2. SHOKAKU CLASS The origin of the ships names. Sho-kaku translates as 'Flying Crane'. During the Pacific War, this powerful aircraft carrier and her name became famous throughout the conflict. However, SHOKAKU was actually the third ship given this name which literally means "the crane which floats in the sky" - an appropriate name for an aircraft perhaps, but hardly for the carrier herself! Zui-kaku. In Japan, the crane ('kaku') has been regarded as a lucky bird since ancient times. 'Zui' actually means 'very lucky' or 'auspicious'. ZUIKAKU participated in all major battles except for Midway, being the most active of all IJN carriers. Page 3. 23 August 1941. A near beam photo of SHOKAKU taken at Yokosuka, two weeks after her completion on 8 August. This is one of the few pictures showing her entire length from this side, which was almost 260m.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Spring 2004 Issue the .SU
    Naval War College Review Volume 57 Article 1 Number 2 Spring 2004 Full Spring 2004 Issue The .SU . Naval War College Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Naval War College, The .SU . (2004) "Full Spring 2004 Issue," Naval War College Review: Vol. 57 : No. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol57/iss2/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Naval War College: Full Spring 2004 Issue N A V A L W A R C O L L E G E NAVAL WAR COLLEGE REVIEW R E V I E W Spring 2004 Volume LVII, Number 2 Spring 2004 Spring N ES AV T A A L T W S A D R E C T I O N L L U E E G H E T R I VI IBU OR A S CT MARI VI Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 2004 1 Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen Naval War College Review, Vol. 57 [2004], No. 2, Art. 1 Cover A Landsat-7 image (taken on 27 July 2000) of the Lena Delta on the Russian Arctic coast, where the Lena River emp- ties into the Laptev Sea. The Lena, which flows northward some 2,800 miles through Siberia, is one of the largest rivers in the world; the delta is a pro- tected wilderness area, the largest in Rus- sia.
    [Show full text]
  • 000008A0.Pdf
    A EVOLUÇÃO TECNOLÓGICA NO SETOR NAVAL NA SEGUNDA METADE DO SÉCULO XIX E AS CONSEQÜÊNCIAS PARA A Marinha do brasil* ARMANDO AMORIM FERREIRA VIDIGAL Vice-Almirante (ReP) SUMÁRIO Introdução A propulsão mista: Da roda ao hélice A Guerra da Crimcia e suas lições A Guerra da Secessão Norte-Americana A Guerra da Tríplice Aliança A Guerra Austro-Prussiana - A Batalha de Lisa A Guerra da Tríplice Aliança Continua A Guerra Franco-Prussiana Acirra-se o duelo couraça x canhão As torpedeiras com tubos axiais A Guerra Chile-Peru Os Cruzadores A evolução da pólvora Ação francesa contra chineses "Jeune A École" A Guerra Estados Unidos x Espanha O Submarino de casco duplo A Guerra Russo-Japonesa A guerra de minas A Batalha do Mar Amarelo A Batalha de Tsushima O Aparecimento do Dreadnought N-R.: O extenso uso do negrito foi para chamar atenção dos diversos tópicos analisados, c que não mereciam Um subtítulo. KMB4ÜT72000131 INTRODUÇÃO armada com a do Chile e a da República da Argentina. Um confronto há pouco esboça- fim da Guerra do Paraguai (1864-70), a do pelo jornal mais influente deste último Ao Marinha Brasil do era, sem nenhuma país,/4 Prensa, de Buenos Aires, opõe a cada dúvida, significativa, só sendo superada, em um de nossos vasos de guerra hoje válidos número de bocas de fogo, pelas Marinhas da um competidor formidável, deixando, ainda, Inglaterra, Rússia, Estado Unidos e Itália, nas sombras, com que compor mais de uma nessa ordem. Poucos anos mais tarde, a Esquadra, capaz de medir-se com nossa. Marinha nacional não tinha ex- Deus nos as já qualquer dê por muitos anos paz com militar.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 Resistance and Powering of Ships
    COURSE OBJECTIVES CHAPTER 7 7. RESISTANCE AND POWERING OF SHIPS 1. Define effective horsepower (EHP) conceptually and mathematically 2. State the relationship between velocity and total resistance, and velocity and effective horsepower 3. Write an equation for total hull resistance as a sum of viscous resistance, wave making resistance and correlation resistance. Explain each of these resistive terms. 4. Draw and explain the flow of water around a moving ship showing the laminar flow region, turbulent flow region, and separated flow region 5. Draw the transverse and longitudinal wave patterns when a displacement ship moves through the water 6. Define Reynolds number with a mathematical formula and explain each parameter in the Reynolds equation with units 7. Be qualitatively familiar with the following sources of ship resistance: a. Steering Resistance b. Air and Wind Resistance c. Added Resistance due to Waves d. Increased Resistance in Shallow Water 8. Read and interpret a ship resistance curve including humps and hollows 9. State the importance of naval architecture modeling for the resistance on the ship's hull 10. Define geometric and dynamic similarity 11. Write the relationships for geometric scale factor in terms of length ratios, speed ratios, wetted surface area ratios and volume ratios 12. Describe the law of comparison (Froude’s law of corresponding speeds) conceptually and mathematically, and state its importance in model testing 13. Qualitatively describe the effects of length and bulbous bows on ship resistance i 14. Be familiar with the momentum theory of propeller action and how it can be used to describe how a propeller creates thrust 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Sinking the Supership 1 Ask Students What They Know About World War II
    Original broadcast: October 4, 2005 BEFORE WATCHING Sinking the Supership 1 Ask students what they know about World War II. Use a map and have students locate specific countries as they describe what PROGRAM OVERVIEW they know about each country’s NOVA investigates the sinking of involvement in the war. Ask students to also locate Japan Japan’s Battleship Yamato through and Okinawa, as well as the historical records, archeological Panama Canal, on a map. evidence, and eyewitness accounts. 2 As students watch, have them col- lect information using the viewing The program: guide provided in the “Battleship Yamato” activity on page 2 • follows an international crew of deep-sea divers and naval (see activity for instructions). historians searching for the remains of the Yamato. • reviews the history of the battleship and the role it played as a weapon of war. AFTER WATCHING • describes Japan’s intent to build a supership twice the size of her competitors and with extreme firepower. 1 Crew members of the Battleship • notes how the Yamato, which was put into service in 1941, was Yamato were told to settle their designed with a bulbous bow intended to reduce the drag of the affairs prior to departing for what they knew would be their final ship’s enormous hull. mission. Ask students why they • points out the secrecy under which the Yamato was built. think crew members accepted the • chronicles how the battleship became obsolete when aircraft order from their superiors to go proved more effective in combat at sea. along on a suicide mission. What • relates how the Battle of Midway—in which the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • {TEXTBOOK} British Battlecruisers: 1905
    BRITISH BATTLECRUISERS: 1905 - 1920 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK John Roberts | 128 pages | 04 Oct 2016 | Pen & Sword Books Ltd | 9781473882355 | English | Barnsley, United Kingdom British Battlecruisers, – | Bookshare Monarch was hulked and used for weapons testing until finally sunk in Thunderer , the last of the sisters, was sold for scrap in In addition, although the King George V class again retained the two Parsons steam turbines and their four shafts , they were faster than previous British battleships with a top speed of All four of the King George V -class ships were assigned to the 2nd Battle Squadron on commission , King George V becoming the Squadron's flagship by 18 February , but Centurion began her career early, accidentally ramming and sinking an Italian steamer with all hands. Into early , the sisters remained with the 2nd Squadron, until King George V was moved to the 3rd Squadron and then became the flagship of the Reserve Fleet until when the 3rd Squadron was disbanded. She was refitted and reassigned to the 4th Squadron the same year, then in became a gunnery training vessel before finally being sold for scrap in December Ajax met the same fate, but was sold for scrap on 9 November The last of the King George V -class ships, Centurion was converted into a target ship, but was remilitarised in with light weapons and dummy main guns. On 9 June , she was sunk as a block ship to defend a mulberry harbor established on Omaha Beach. In design the sisters were nearly identical to the King George V class , bearing the same ten Mk V New for British dreadnoughts, the four Iron Duke -class sisters were fairly separated from each other in their careers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anglo-German Naval Arms Race, 1906-1916
    Middle States Geographer, 2012, 45: 84-89 FROM INNOVATION TO IMPASSE: THE ANGLO-GERMAN NAVAL ARMS RACE, 1906-1916 Darrell A. Norris Department of Geography S.U.N.Y. College at Geneseo Geneseo, NY 14454 ABSTRACT: Weapons systems’ common compromise of offensive power, defensive protection, and mobility was expressed as a sensational innovation in naval architecture with the completion of HMS Dreadnought in 1906, when Great Power rivalry guaranteed an ensuing arms race. The latter entailed steady improvements of power, protection, and propulsion, all requiring a larger and more costly platform to incorporate even slight advantages. The large dreadnought fleets built by Britain and Germany incorporated few improvements in tactics, command and control. Lengthening big gun ranges exceeded their limits of effectiveness, and hit rates at long range fell to 3 percent or less, yielding probable stalemate other than the destruction of obsolete vessel types and vulnerable hybrids. Advances in destructive power, protection, and speed led inexorably to the increased size and cost of capital ships, climaxed by their inconclusive clash at Jutland in 1916. As a weapon system, the battleship was necessarily modified to cope with air and undersea attack, with imperfect success. Such new vulnerabilities for the battleship echoed the denouement of French armored and mounted knights by English archers and men-at-arms at Agincourt. Perfect weapon symmetry and its related spatial deployment are apt to be transitory phenomena in the practice of modern warfare. Keywords: naval history, arms race In Ancient Greece, the Olympic wrestler already represented a long-outdated and intentionally ritualized form of combat, one with no added protection, strength, or range of movement independent of human anatomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulbous Bow - Wikipedia 6/25/20, 857 AM
    Bulbous bow - Wikipedia 6/25/20, 8)57 AM Bulbous bow A bulbous bow is a protruding bulb at the bow (or front) of a ship just below the waterline. The bulb modifies the way the water flows around the hull, reducing drag and thus increasing speed, range, fuel efficiency, and stability. Large ships with bulbous bows generally have twelve to fifteen percent better fuel efficiency than similar vessels without them.[2] A bulbous bow also increases the buoyancy of the forward part and hence reduces the pitching of the ship to a small degree. Vessels with high kinetic energy, which is proportional to mass A "ram" bulbous bow curves upwards and the square of the velocity, benefit from having a bulbous bow from the bottom, and has a "knuckle" that is designed for their operating speed; this includes vessels if the top is higher than the juncture with high mass (e.g. supertankers) or a high service speed (e.g. with the hull—the through-tunnels in [3] passenger ships, and cargo ships). Vessels of lower mass (less the side are bow thrusters.[1] than 4,000 dwt) and those that operate at slower speeds (less than 12 kts) have a reduced benefit from bulbous bows, because of the eddies that occur in those cases;[3] examples include tugboats, powerboats, sailing vessels, and small yachts. Bulbous bows have been found to be most effective when used on vessels that meet the following conditions: The waterline length is longer than about 15 metres (49 ft).[4] The bulb design is optimized for the vessel's operating speed.[5] Contents Underlying principle Development Design considerations Sonar domes Notes References Underlying principle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulbous_bow Page 1 of 6 Bulbous bow - Wikipedia 6/25/20, 8)57 AM The effect of the bulbous bow can be explained using the concept of destructive interference of waves:[6] A conventionally shaped bow causes a bow wave.
    [Show full text]