DOCSLIB.ORG

{TEXTBOOK} British Battlecruisers: 1905

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
{TEXTBOOK} British Battlecruisers: 1905 BRITISH BATTLECRUISERS: 1905 - 1920 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK John Roberts | 128 pages | 04 Oct 2016 | Pen & Sword Books Ltd | 9781473882355 | English | Barnsley, United Kingdom British Battlecruisers, – | Bookshare Monarch was hulked and used for weapons testing until finally sunk in Thunderer , the last of the sisters, was sold for scrap in In addition, although the King George V class again retained the two Parsons steam turbines and their four shafts , they were faster than previous British battleships with a top speed of All four of the King George V -class ships were assigned to the 2nd Battle Squadron on commission , King George V becoming the Squadron's flagship by 18 February , but Centurion began her career early, accidentally ramming and sinking an Italian steamer with all hands. Into early , the sisters remained with the 2nd Squadron, until King George V was moved to the 3rd Squadron and then became the flagship of the Reserve Fleet until when the 3rd Squadron was disbanded. She was refitted and reassigned to the 4th Squadron the same year, then in became a gunnery training vessel before finally being sold for scrap in December Ajax met the same fate, but was sold for scrap on 9 November The last of the King George V -class ships, Centurion was converted into a target ship, but was remilitarised in with light weapons and dummy main guns. On 9 June , she was sunk as a block ship to defend a mulberry harbor established on Omaha Beach. In design the sisters were nearly identical to the King George V class , bearing the same ten Mk V New for British dreadnoughts, the four Iron Duke -class sisters were fairly separated from each other in their careers. Marlborough and Benbow struggled with poor visibility, the former firing seven salvos at a group of Kaiser -class battleships and the latter firing six salvos, both without effect. After the battle, Marlborough underwent three months of repairs and received increased armour plating, [] [] and Emperor of India rejoined the Home Fleet in the 1st Battle Squadron. In March , the Iron Duke -class sisters were assigned to the 4th Battle Squadron with the Mediterranean Fleet to participate in the Allied intervention in the Russian Civil War in the Black Sea , [] [] Marlborough even carrying Maria Feodorovna , Grand Duke Nicholas , and Prince Yusupov , [] and then the sisters served in the Greco-Turkish War until Greece's defeat in the war in , [] at which point Marlborough , Benbow , and Emperor of India underwent refitting at different ports. Her propulsion means was also unusual for British battleships. In April of the next year, she was sold back to Chile and resumed her original name. The new calibre guns were intended to still give the Royal Navy an advantage in range over newer American and Japanese ships which the Admiralty expected were to be armed with inch guns. Secondary armament was fourteen 6-inch, two 3-inch anti-aircraft and four inch torpedoes tubes. The Revenge class sometimes known as the Royal Sovereign class were designed as a cheaper alternative to the Queen Elizabeth class. Plans had initially been for a class of eight ships, but at the start of the First World War work stopped on all new capital ships. The last three ships Renown , Repulse and Resistance were cancelled. The first two of these were eventually redesigned as battlecruisers. However, in , this was changed and they became oil-fuelled only. Secondary armament was fourteen 6-inch, two 3-inch anti-aircraft, four 3- pounder guns and four inch torpedoes. Royal Oak was torpedoed at anchor in the supposedly safe harbour of Scapa Flow soon after the start of Second World War. The N3, like the contemporary G3-class battlecruiser design, were planned in response to other nations' intentions to build superior navies. The design concentrated the main guns forward of the bridge to reduce weight while allowing very thick armour over the critical parts but they would still be about twice the displacement of predecessors. The design was approved in but in the major naval powers agreed the Washington Naval Treaty to limit the size and number of warships in their navies. The treaty set an upper limit of 35, tons displacement and inch guns; the ships had not been ordered and no construction had been started. The two ships of the Nelson class were the only new battleships the Royal Navy were allowed to build under the terms of the Washington Naval Treaty. The layout was based on that of the N3 battleship and G3 battlecruiser but further reduced to come under the weight limit. Nine BL 16 inch Mk I guns — the same as were to have been used on the G3 battlecruisers — were carried in three forward turrets. Secondary armament was twelve 6-inch guns mounted in six turrets at the rear of the ship, six 4. The King George V class of ships were criticized for having inch main guns the preceding Nelson class had larger, though relatively lighter 16 inch guns. The decision to use inch guns was taken in October , while the United Kingdom was negotiating for a continuation of the Naval Treaties with the other parties to the London Treaty. The British Government favoured a reduction in the maximum gun calibre to 14 inches and, in early October, the government learned that the United States would support this position if the Japanese could also be persuaded to do so. Since the large guns needed to be ordered by the end of the year in order for ships to enter service on time, the British Admiralty decided on inch guns for the King George V class. The guns were arranged in three turrets, two with four and one behind and above the forward turret with two guns. Secondary armament was sixteen QF 5. Anson and Howe had eighteen Oerlikon 20 mm cannon and the Duke of York six. The King George V class were designed to reach a speed of over 27 knots. As the treaty negotiations collapsed, this lack of speed and the smaller size of their main armament left them slower and with a lesser broadside than foreign battleships that were being produced around the same time. However, their main armour belt was thicker than others, with the exception of the two very large ships of the Yamato class from Japan. During the Second London Naval Treaty of , the upper limit for battleships was agreed by the powers attending but an escalator clause allowed for increases if parties defaulted. The Admiralty had planned to scrap the ineffective Revenge class when the King George V ships entered service. These plans were soon changed, the Admiralty's new ambition was to raise a battle fleet of 20 ships, 15 of them to match the new standard, keeping the Revenge class until at least To meet this target the navy wanted three battleships added to the plans, but in the end only two were given the go ahead and even then they had to use reserve slipways, normally only used in emergencies. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Wikipedia list article. Main article: HMS Dreadnought Main article: Bellerophon-class battleship. Main article: St Vincent-class battleship. Main article: HMS Neptune Main article: Colossus-class battleship Main article: Orion-class battleship. Main article: King George V-class battleship Main article: Iron Duke-class battleship. Main article: HMS Agincourt Main article: HMS Erin. Main article: Chilean battleship Almirante Latorre. Main article: Queen Elizabeth-class battleship. Main article: Revenge-class battleship. Main article: N3-class battleship. Main article: Nelson-class battleship. Main article: Lion-class battleship. Main article: HMS Vanguard Battleships portal. Royal Navy. He planned to reorder two Revenge -class battleships , which had been approved but not yet laid down, to a new design. Fisher finally received approval for this project on 28 December and they became the Renown class. With six inch guns but only 6-inch armour they were a further step forward from Tiger in firepower and speed, but returned to the level of protection of the first British battlecruisers. These ships were essentially light battlecruisers, and Fisher occasionally referred to them as such, but officially they were classified as large light cruisers. This unusual designation was required because construction of new capital ships had been placed on hold, while there were no limits on light cruiser construction. The design was generally regarded as a failure nicknamed in the Fleet Outrageous , Uproarious and Spurious , though the later conversion of the ships to aircraft carriers was very successful. It is often held that the Renown and Courageous classes were designed for Fisher's plan to land troops possibly Russian on the German Baltic coast. Specifically, they were designed with a reduced draught , which might be important in the shallow Baltic. This is not clear-cut evidence that the ships were designed for the Baltic: it was considered that earlier ships had too much draught and not enough freeboard under operational conditions. Roberts argues that the focus on the Baltic was probably unimportant at the time the ships were designed, but was inflated later, after the disastrous Dardanelles Campaign. The final British battlecruiser design of the war was the Admiral class , which was born from a requirement for an improved version of the Queen Elizabeth battleship. The project began at the end of , after Fisher's final departure from the Admiralty. While initially envisaged as a battleship, senior sea officers felt that Britain had enough battleships, but that new battlecruisers might be required to combat German ships being built the British overestimated German progress on the Mackensen class as well as their likely capabilities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A New Carrier Race? Yoji Koda
    Naval War College Review Volume 64 Article 4 Number 3 Summer 2011 A New Carrier Race? Yoji Koda Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Koda, Yoji (2011) "A New Carrier Race?," Naval War College Review: Vol. 64 : No. 3 , Article 4. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol64/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen Koda: A New Carrier Race? A NEW CARRIER RACE? Strategy, Force Planning, and JS Hyuga Vice Admiral Yoji Koda, Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (Retired) n 18 March 2009 JS Hyuga (DDH 181) was commissioned and delivered to Othe Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (JMSDF). The unique characteris- tic of this ship is its aircraft-carrier-like design, with a “through” flight deck and an island on the starboard side. Hyuga was planned in the five-year Midterm De- fense Buildup Plan (MTDBP) of 2001 and funded in Japanese fiscal year (JFY) 2004 as the replacement for the aging first-generation helicopter-carrying de- stroyer (DDH), JS Haruna (DDH 141), which was to reach the end of its service life of thirty-five years in 2009. The second ship of the new class, JS Ise (DDH 182), of the JFY 2006 program, was commissioned 16 March 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 R.A.N. SHIPS OVERSEAS to JUNE 194 0 URING the First Ten Months Of
    CHAPTER 4 R.A.N. SHIPS OVERSEAS TO JUNE 194 0 URING the first ten months of the war, those Australian ships not D retained on the home station were employed in Imperial dispositions in widely separated areas . The first six months found Perth in Central American waters, mainly engaged in the dual task of protecting trade — especially the important tanker traffic in the Caribbean—and preventin g the escape of German merchant ships sheltering in neutral ports of th e islands and the Isthmus . Last of the three expansion-program cruiser s acquired from Britain, she had commissioned at Portsmouth on the 29th June 1939 as H .M.A. Ship under "Fighting Freddie " Farncomb, a studious , coolly-efficient officer whose nickname, bestowed during the war, reflected the confidence and esteem of the lower deck . Perth sailed from Portsmouth on the 26th July for Australia via th e Panama Canal, and reached New York, where she represented Australi a at the World Fair, on the 4th August. On the 21st of the month, after twelve days of American hospitality, she arrived at Kingston, Jamaica, an d was to have sailed for Panama on the 23rd, but in the early morning o f that date Farncomb received a signal sent to the Admiralty by the Com- mander-in-Chief, America and West Indies—Vice-Admiral Meyrick' — asking that Perth might remain on the station . Farncomb thereupon can- celled his sailing arrangements, thus anticipating an Admiralty signa l received later in the day directing him to "return Kingston and awai t further orders " .
    [Show full text]
  • At the Double a Snowy Douaumont
    JOURNAL February 48 2013 At the Double A snowy Douaumont Please note that Copyright for any articles contained in this Journal rests with the Authors as shown. Please contact them directly if you wish to use their material. 1 Hello All An interesting article in the Times caught my eye a couple of weeks ago. Carrying the heading: ‘Dramatic boost for campaign to honour first black officer’, it covers the life of Walter Tull, a coloured professional footballer with Tottenham Hotspur and Northampton Town, who joined up in the ranks at the beginning of the War, enlisting in the 17th Battalion (1st Footballer’s), Middlesex Regiment as it came to be known, and was later commissioned, before being killed in March, 1918. The campaign referred to, asks the government to award him a posthumous Military Cross for his bravery, and indeed, he had been recommended for the MC for courageous acts undertaken some time before his death. But, one presumes that, given that a unit could only receive so many awards in a month, more meritorious acts were recognised, and so Walter Tull’s gallantry sadly went unrewarded. The award of a posthumous MC to a very brave man does sound like a nice idea, but in these specific circumstances is it not woolly-headed? Politically correct even? I think that it is both, and would set an unwelcome precedent. With the rationing of medals, whoever had to decide who should receive the six, shall we say, awards from ten recommendations had to make a judgement call, and these decisions were made at Brigade and Division level.
    [Show full text]
  • Tempest – Unravelling the UK’S New Strike Aircraft Project
    160 years of innovation theengineer.co.uk October 2018 | £3.70 Future fighter Tempest – unravelling the UK’s new strike aircraft project C2I 2018 The shortlisted finalists for The Engineer’s annual Collaborate to Innovate awards Station masters Driving change Car of the issue The engineering challenges Jaguar Land Rover’s Elizabeth Meet Nomad, the off-road of fitting out Crossrail’s Hill talks electrification, supercar from the firm new stations skills and innovation »32 behind the Ariel Atom »34 »37 »30 Ed - front cover_The Engineer - October 2018_The Engineer 1 02/10/2018 12:17 Over 100 years invested in the UK’s future. E-SCAN RADAR ENSURES INFORMATION SUPERIORITY FOR BATTLESPACE DOMINANCE PRAETORIAN DEFENSIVE AIDS SUB-SYSTEM (DASS) PROVIDES PROTECTION AGAINST AIR-TO-AIR AND SURFACE-TO-AIR THREAT LEONARDO DESIGNS AND BUILDS OVER 60% OF THE EUROFIGHTER TYPHOON’S AVIONICS Leonardo has over 100 years of history at the leading edge of advanced design and manufacturing in the UK. Over 7,000 highly-skilled employees and a vast network of suppliers and partners design and develop industry-leading aircraft, electronics, space, defence and security systems for UK and export customers, worldwide. Inspired by the vision, curiosity and creativity of the great master inventor - Leonardo is designing the technology of tomorrow. leonardocompany.com Helicopters | Aeronautics | Electronics, Defence & Security Systems | Space TE_011018_Leonardo_FP.indd 1 27/09/2018 10:32 TE_011018_Leonardo_FP.indd 1 27/09/2018 10:34 editor comment thisissue ouropinion Volume 297 Issue No.7902 Established 1856 A storm on the way news 04 R obotics Humans use special gloves head of this summer’s Farnborough International Airshow we ran a to teach robots to be nimble somewhat timely poll on The Engineer’s website asking readers 06 A utomotive UK-built drivetrains for a whether they felt we might currently be seeing the last generation of new fleet of South American buses manned military aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Turks and Europe by Gaston Gaillard London: Thomas Murby & Co
    THE TURKS AND EUROPE BY GASTON GAILLARD LONDON: THOMAS MURBY & CO. 1 FLEET LANE, E.C. 1921 1 vi CONTENTS PAGES VI. THE TREATY WITH TURKEY: Mustafa Kemal’s Protest—Protests of Ahmed Riza and Galib Kemaly— Protest of the Indian Caliphate Delegation—Survey of the Treaty—The Turkish Press and the Treaty—Jafar Tayar at Adrianople—Operations of the Government Forces against the Nationalists—French Armistice in Cilicia—Mustafa Kemal’s Operations—Greek Operations in Asia Minor— The Ottoman Delegation’s Observations at the Peace Conference—The Allies’ Answer—Greek Operations in Thrace—The Ottoman Government decides to sign the Treaty—Italo-Greek Incident, and Protests of Armenia, Yugo-Slavia, and King Hussein—Signature of the Treaty – 169—271 VII. THE DISMEMBERMENT OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE: 1. The Turco-Armenian Question - 274—304 2. The Pan-Turanian and Pan-Arabian Movements: Origin of Pan-Turanism—The Turks and the Arabs—The Hejaz—The Emir Feisal—The Question of Syria—French Operations in Syria— Restoration of Greater Lebanon—The Arabian World and the Caliphate—The Part played by Islam - 304—356 VIII. THE MOSLEMS OF THE FORMER RUSSIAN EMPIRE AND TURKEY: The Republic of Northern Caucasus—Georgia and Azerbaïjan—The Bolshevists in the Republics of Caucasus and of the Transcaspian Isthmus—Armenians and Moslems - 357—369 IX. TURKEY AND THE SLAVS: Slavs versus Turks—Constantinople and Russia - 370—408 2 THE TURKS AND EUROPE I THE TURKS The peoples who speak the various Turkish dialects and who bear the generic name of Turcomans, or Turco-Tatars, are distributed over huge territories occupying nearly half of Asia and an important part of Eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress
    Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress September 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL32665 Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The current and planned size and composition of the Navy, the annual rate of Navy ship procurement, the prospective affordability of the Navy’s shipbuilding plans, and the capacity of the U.S. shipbuilding industry to execute the Navy’s shipbuilding plans have been oversight matters for the congressional defense committees for many years. In December 2016, the Navy released a force-structure goal that calls for achieving and maintaining a fleet of 355 ships of certain types and numbers. The 355-ship goal was made U.S. policy by Section 1025 of the FY2018 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 2810/P.L. 115- 91 of December 12, 2017). The Navy and the Department of Defense (DOD) have been working since 2019 to develop a successor for the 355-ship force-level goal. The new goal is expected to introduce a new, more distributed fleet architecture featuring a smaller proportion of larger ships, a larger proportion of smaller ships, and a new third tier of large unmanned vehicles (UVs). On June 17, 2021, the Navy released a long-range Navy shipbuilding document that presents the Biden Administration’s emerging successor to the 355-ship force-level goal. The document calls for a Navy with a more distributed fleet architecture, including 321 to 372 manned ships and 77 to 140 large UVs. A September 2021 Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report estimates that the fleet envisioned in the document would cost an average of between $25.3 billion and $32.7 billion per year in constant FY2021 dollars to procure.
    [Show full text]
  • Dreadnoughts and Crosses – How Battleships Brought the ANZACS to Gallipoli
    Dreadnoughts and Crosses – How battleships brought the ANZACS to Gallipoli Part 1 – The South American Arena HMS Dreadnought: The revolutionary fighting machine, launched in 1906, whose namesakes eventually brought the ANZACS to Gallipoli. Source: "HMS Dreadnought 1906 H61017" by U.S. Navy - U.S. Naval Historical Center. Licensed under Public Domain via Commons - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HMS_Dreadnought_1906_H61017 jpg#/media/File:HMS_Dreadnought_1906_H61017.jpg 4.00 am on Sunday, 20 December 2015 marked the centenary of the last man leaving ANZAC cove at the end of the Gallipoli campaign. By the time the Allies evacuated the peninsula after just over eight months of fighting, each side had lost just under 60,000 dead. By the military standards of other battles in World War I these losses were small. Despite this, for three combatant countries, the young dominions of Australia and New Zealand and the yet to be born Turkish Republic, the battle was a seminal national event. For this reason the details of the battle itself are well known and have been repeatedly re- enacted in print, video and film. What has received slightly less attention is how the Allies and the Turkish (Ottoman) Empire came to be enemies in the first place. The Ottoman Empire was not part of the deadly twin daisy chains of alliances and obligations that dragged all the other great imperial powers of Europe into an involuntary state of war in the days after the Austro Hungarian Empire chose to attack Serbia. The Ottomans had the luxury of choice. They could join the Allies, or they could join the Central Powers.
    [Show full text]
  • NARVIK – Norwegian Eldorado for Wreck-Divers Wrecks of Narvik
    NARVIK – Norwegian Eldorado for wreck-divers Wrecks of Narvik Text by Erling Skjold (history and diving) and Frank Bang (diving) Underwater photography by Frank Bang Ship photography by Erling Skjolds, NSA collection Translation by Michael Symes Dieter von Roeder The port of Narvik in north Norway was established around the export of iron-ore from Sweden. This was due to the very good harbour and its ice-free con- ditions. At the outbreak of World War II, Narvik was a strategically important harbour, and during the first few days of the war a very intense battle was fought out here between German, Norwegian and British naval forces. During this fighting several ships were sunk, both warships and civil merchant ships. Narvik harbour was transformed into a great ship ceme- tery, with wrecks sticking up out of the water every- where. Several of the ships were later salvaged, but many wrecks still remained. With its high density of wrecks, Narvik is an eldorado for wreck divers. A diver explores the wreck of the German destroyer Hermann Künne in Trollvika 61 X-RAY MAG : 5 : 2005 EDITORIAL FEATURES TRAVEL NEWS EQUIPMENT BOOKS SCIENCE & ECOLOGY EDUCATION PROFILES PORTFOLIO CLASSIFIED features Narvik Wrecks www.navalhistory.net Narvik harbour Maps outline battles in Narvik and around Norway during World War II Narvik harbour The importance of Narvik as a strate- Attack on April 9th the Eidsvold in just a few seconds. The that it was British gic harbour increased immediately at The German attack was a great surprise German ships could thereafter sail into forces that were the outbreak of World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Aircraft Carrier Ambitions
    Naval War College Review Volume 57 Article 8 Number 1 Winter 2004 China’s Aircraft aC rrier Ambitions Ian Storey You Ji Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Storey, Ian and Ji, You (2004) "China’s Aircraft aC rrier Ambitions," Naval War College Review: Vol. 57 : No. 1 , Article 8. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol57/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Storey and Ji: China’s Aircraft Carrier Ambitions Dr. Storey is lecturer in the School of Social and Interna- tional Studies, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. He obtained his master’s degree from the International Uni- versity of Japan and his Ph.D. from the City University of Hong Kong. Dr. Storey is currently course coordinator for the Defence and Strategic Studies Course delivered by Deakin University at the Centre for Defence and Strategic Studies (CDSS), the Australian Defence College, Canberra. He has published articles in Contemporary Southeast Asia and Parameters and is a regular contributor to Jane’s Intelligence Review. His latest book is The China Threat: Perceptions, Myths and Reality (coedited, 2002). He is currently working on Southeast Asia and the Rise of China: The Search for Security. E-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Old Pangbournian Record Volume 2
    The Old Pangbournian Record Volume 2 Casualties in War 1917-2020 Collected and written by Robin Knight (56-61) The Old Pangbournian Society The Old angbournianP Record Volume 2 Casualties in War 1917-2020 Collected and written by Robin Knight (56-61) The Old Pangbournian Society First published in the UK 2020 The Old Pangbournian Society Copyright © 2020 The moral right of the Old Pangbournian Society to be identified as the compiler of this work is asserted in accordance with Section 77 of the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, “Beloved by many. stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any Death hides but it does not divide.” * means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior consent of the Old Pangbournian Society in writing. All photographs are from personal collections or publicly-available free sources. Back Cover: © Julie Halford – Keeper of Roll of Honour Fleet Air Arm, RNAS Yeovilton ISBN 978-095-6877-031 Papers used in this book are natural, renewable and recyclable products sourced from well-managed forests. Typeset in Adobe Garamond Pro, designed and produced *from a headstone dedication to R.E.F. Howard (30-33) by NP Design & Print Ltd, Wallingford, U.K. Foreword In a global and total war such as 1939-45, one in Both were extremely impressive leaders, soldiers which our national survival was at stake, sacrifice and human beings. became commonplace, almost routine. Today, notwithstanding Covid-19, the scale of losses For anyone associated with Pangbourne, this endured in the World Wars of the 20th century is continued appetite and affinity for service is no almost incomprehensible.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Royal Marines 1837-1914 HE Blumberg
    History of the Royal Marines 1837-1914 HE Blumberg (Minor editing by Alastair Donald) In preparing this Record I have consulted, wherever possible, the original reports, Battalion War and other Diaries, accounts in Globe and Laurel, etc. The War Office Official Accounts, where extant, the London Gazettes, and Orders in Council have been taken as the basis of events recounted, and I have made free use of the standard histories, eg History of the British Army (Fortescue), History of the Navy (Laird Clowes), Britain's Sea Soldiers (Field), etc. Also the Lives of Admirals and Generals bearing on the campaigns. The authorities consulted have been quoted for each campaign, in order that those desirous of making a fuller study can do so. I have made no pretence of writing a history or making comments, but I have tried to place on record all facts which can show the development of the Corps through the Nineteenth and early part of the Twentieth Centuries. H E BLUMBERG Devonport January, 1934 1 P A R T I 1837 – 1839 The Long Peace On 20 June, 1837, Her Majesty Queen Victoria ascended the Throne and commenced the long reign which was to bring such glory and honour to England, but the year found the fortunes of the Corps at a very low ebb. The numbers voted were 9007, but the RM Artillery had officially ceased to exist - a School of Laboratory and nominally two companies quartered at Fort Cumberland as part of the Portsmouth Division only being maintained. The Portsmouth Division were still in the old inadequate Clarence Barracks in the High Street; Plymouth and Chatham were in their present barracks, which had not then been enlarged to their present size, and Woolwich were in the western part of the Royal Artillery Barracks.
    [Show full text]
  • {Download PDF} Naval Weapons of World War
    NAVAL WEAPONS OF WORLD WAR ONE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Norman Friedman | 320 pages | 15 Dec 2011 | Pen & Sword Books Ltd | 9781848321007 | English | Barnsley, United Kingdom List of naval guns by caliber - Wikipedia Between and weapons development was both rapid and complex, so this book has two functions: on the one hand it details all the guns, torpedoes, mines, aerial bombs and anti-submarine systems employed during that period; but it also seeks to explain the background to their evolution: how the weapons were perceived at the time and how they were actually used. This involves a discussion of tactics and emphasizes the key enabling technology of fire control and gun mountings. In this respect, the book treats the war as a transition from naval weapons which were essentially experimental at its outbreak to a state where they pointed directly to what would be used in World War II. Based largely on original research, this sophisticated book is more than a catalogue of the weapons, offering insight into some of the most important technical and operational factors influencing the war at sea. Reviews Review Policy. Published on. Flowing text, Google-generated PDF. Best for. Web, Tablet, Phone, eReader. Norman Friedman is a prominent naval analyst and the author of more than thirty books covering a range of naval subjects, from warship histories to contemporary defense issues. He is a longtime columnist for Proceedings magazine and lives in New York City. Naval Weapons of World War One. Norman Friedman. Although the Great War might be regarded as the heyday of the big-gun at sea, it also saw the maturing of underwater weapons the mine and torpedo as well as the first signs of the future potency of air power.
    [Show full text]