DOCSLIB.ORG

Landing Together: Pacific Amphibious Development and Implications for the U.S. Fleet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Landing Together: Pacific Amphibious Development and Implications for the U.S. Fleet June 2016 Landing Together Pacific Amphibious Development and Implications for the U.S. Fleet PROJECT DIRECTOR Kathleen H. Hicks AUTHORS Kathleen H. Hicks Mark F. Cancian Andrew Metrick John Schaus A Report of the CSIS International Security Program About CSIS For over 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has worked to develop solutions to the world’s greatest policy challenges. Today, CSIS scholars are providing strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, DC. The Center’s 220 full-time staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analysis and develop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded at the height of the Cold War by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke, CSIS was dedicated to finding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. Since 1962, CSIS has become one of the world’s preeminent international institutions focused on defense and security; regional stability; and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global health and economic integration. Thomas J. Pritzker was named chairman of the CSIS Board of Trustees in November 2015. Former U.S. deputy secretary of defense John J. Hamre has served as the Center’s president and chief executive officer since 2000. CSIS does not take specific policy positions; accordingly, all views expressed herein should be understood to be solely those of the author(s). © 2016 by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-1-4422-5961-4 (pb); 978-1-4422-5962-1 (eBook) Center for Strategic & International Studies Rowman & Littlefield 1616 Rhode Island Avenue, NW 4501 Forbes Boulevard Washington, DC 20036 Lanham, MD 20706 202-887-0200 | www.csis.org 301-459-3366 | www.rowman.com 8 Contents List of Tables and Figures ............................................................................................................................ 11 Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................................... 13 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 14 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 15 1 Demand for U.S. Amphibious Forces .................................................................................................. 18 Warfighting Requirements ...................................................................................................................... 18 COCOM Presence and Crisis Response Requirements ........................................................................... 19 2 Supply of U.S. Amphibious Forces ...................................................................................................... 25 The Amphibious Fleet: Historical Trends ................................................................................................ 25 Force Generation .................................................................................................................................... 28 Force Allocation ...................................................................................................................................... 30 The Amphibious Fleet of Today and Tomorrow ..................................................................................... 32 Alternative Platforms .............................................................................................................................. 35 Connectors .............................................................................................................................................. 38 Budget Constraints: Effects on Amphibious Capacity ............................................................................. 39 3 Pacific Allies and Partners: Amphibious Capabilities and Development ............................................ 41 Australia .................................................................................................................................................. 41 India ........................................................................................................................................................ 45 Japan ....................................................................................................................................................... 48 The Philippines ........................................................................................................................................ 52 Republic of Singapore ............................................................................................................................. 54 South Korea ............................................................................................................................................. 56 4 Assessment of U.S., Ally, and Partner Amphibious Capabilities ......................................................... 60 Assessing Amphibious Capability ............................................................................................................ 63 Country Assessments .............................................................................................................................. 66 Implications for the United States .......................................................................................................... 84 5 Meeting the Demands ........................................................................................................................ 87 Options for Process and Organizational Adjustments ............................................................................ 87 Options for Force Structure Changes ...................................................................................................... 90 6 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................ 104 Appendix 1. Categories of Amphibious Vessels ........................................................................................ 106 9 Appendix 2. Description of Cost-Analysis Tool ......................................................................................... 108 About the Authors .................................................................................................................................... 109 10 List of Tables and Figures Tables 3.1. Australian Amphibious Platforms 3.2. Indian Amphibious Platforms 3.3. Japanese Amphibious Platforms 3.4. Philippine Amphibious Platforms 3.5. Singaporean Amphibious Platforms 3.6. South Korean Amphibious Platforms 4.1. Assessment of USMC ARG/MEU 4.2. Assessment of USMC SP-MAGTF-CR 4.3. Assessment of Australian Amphibious Capability 4.4. Assessment of Indian Amphibious Capability 4.5. Assessment of Japan Self-Defense Force Amphibious Capability 4.6. Assessment of Philippine Amphibious Capability 4.7. Assessment of Singaporean Amphibious Capability 4.8. Assessment of Republic of Korea Amphibious Capability 5.1. Options for Force Structure Changes Figures 1.1. Distances between Key Locations in the Asia Pacific 1.2. MEU Crisis Responses in PACOM: 2000–2012 2.1. Amphibious Fleet Hulls and Tonnage: 1975–Present 2.2. Average Displacement per Ship: 1975–2015 2.3. Amphibious Force as a Percentage of Total Fleet: 1975–2015 2.4. Amphibious Ship Presence relative to COCOM Request: FY2008–2015 2.5. Amphibious Force and Lift Requirement: FY2016–2045 11 2.6. Amphibious Force as a Percentage of Total Fleet: FY2016–2045 4.1. Demand for U.S. Capabilities in Combined Operations— All Assessed Countries 4.2. Demand for U.S. Capabilities in Likely Combined Operations 5.1. Added Capability across the Range of Military Operations—L-Class Options 5.2. Added Capability across the Range of Military Operations—E/T-Class Options 12 Acknowledgments This study began under the direction of Dr. Maren Leed, senior adviser for the Harold Brown Chair in Defense Policy Study, and supported by her research team—Jaimie Hoskins, Alvaro Genie, Christine Wilkins, and Hyo Sung Joo. When Dr. Leed became special assistant to the chief of naval operations, the study lead transitioned to Dr. Kathleen Hicks and the current study team. The authors would like to thank Dr. Leed and the Brown Chair team for their significant early contributions to this report. Likewise, the authors are grateful for the invaluable research support provided by Amber O’Rourke, David Hookey, and Zachary White throughout the course of this study. The authors would also like to thank the following people for sharing their time and insights as the study unfolded: Colonel Anthony “Ché” Bolden, Colonel Peter Farnum, Eric Labs, Grant Newsham, Jonathan Geithner, Frank Hoffman, and numerous officials and officers from within the United States and in ally or partner nations. This study has been improved by insights from those noted here, but the content and recommendations presented—including any mistakes—remain solely those of the authors. Finally, the study team is grateful to Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII), which sponsored this work seeing the value in growing general knowledge
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE FEASIBLITY of the OVER-THE-HORIZON AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT for U.S. NAVY and MARINE CORPS FORCES a Thesis Presented To
    THE FEASIBLITY OF THE OVER-THE-HORIZON AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT FOR U.S. NAVY AND MARINE CORPS FORCES A thesis presented to the Faculty of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff Colege in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE STEPHEN L. GOERTZEN, LCDR, USN B.S., U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland, 1982 Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 1993 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Name of Candidate: LCDR Stephen L. Goertzen, USN Thesis Title: The Feasibility of the Over-the-Horizon Amphibious Assault for the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps Forces Approved by: u , Thesis Committee Chaiman LTCOL W. A. Sp , Member Accepted this 4th day of June 1993 by: , Director, Graduate Degree Philip J. Brookes, Ph.D. Programs The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the student author and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College or any other governmental agency. (References to this study should include the foregoing statement.) ABSTRACT THE FEASIBILITY OF THE OVER-THE-HORIZON AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT FOR U.S. NAVY AND MARINE CORPS FORCES: An analysis of the doctrine, equipment, and technology contributing to the feasibility of the over-the-horizon amphibious assault. By Lieutenant Commander Stephen L. Goertzen, USN, 128 pages. This study is an analysis of the tactics,techniques, procedures, doctrine, equipment, and technology utilized in over-the-horizon amphibious assaults. The study examines the issues surrounding current feasibility of the assault, as well as future feasibility of the assault.
    [Show full text]
  • Roy Williamson
    #214 ROY A. WILLIAMSON: USS PYRO Steven Haller (SH): My name is Steven Haller and we're at the Sheraton Waikiki Hotel in Honolulu, Hawaii. It's December 5, 1991, at about 3:30 PM. And I have the pleasure to be speaking with Mr. Roy A. Williamson today. We're doing this tape as a part of the USS ARIZONA Memorial and National Park Services' oral history program, in cooperation with KHET-TV, Honolulu. Mr. Williamson was on the ammunition ship, PYRO, at the time of the attack. He was twenty-five years of age and was a Carpenter's Mate, First Class. So I want to thank you very much for joining us and taking the time to share your memories. Let's see, how did you get in the Navy? Roy A. Williamson (RW): Back during the depression, whenever there was no -- there was jobs, but no money, and I saw a sign on the corner, says, "Come join the Navy and see the world," and I went in and, and they were only taking a couple of 'em a month from Oklahoma. And I went out and passed the examination, and they told me that if you don't get called within a month or within six months, then come back and take it over again to keep on the list. And yet I was called within six months, before the six months was up, and went into the service and spent four years in the Navy, and then got out and they told me that since the war was like it was, or would be coming up probably, that I was draft age and if I didn't ship over, they would draft me.
    [Show full text]
  • China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities—Background and Issues for Congress
    China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities—Background and Issues for Congress (name redacted) Specialist in Naval Affairs November 1, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL33153 China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities Summary China since the early to mid-1990s has been steadily building a modern and powerful navy. China’s navy in recent years has emerged as a formidable military force within China’s near-seas region, and it is conducting a growing number of operations in more-distant waters, including the broader waters of the Western Pacific, the Indian Ocean, and waters around Europe. Observers of Chinese and U.S. military forces view China’s improving naval capabilities as posing a challenge in the Western Pacific to the U.S. Navy’s ability to achieve and maintain control of blue-water ocean areas in wartime—the first such challenge the U.S. Navy has faced since the end of the Cold War. More broadly, these observers view China’s naval capabilities as a key element of a broader Chinese military challenge to the long-standing status of the United States as the leading military power in the Western Pacific. The question of how the United States should respond to China’s military modernization effort, including its naval modernization effort, is a key issue in U.S. defense planning. China’s naval modernization effort encompasses a wide array of platform and weapon acquisition programs, including anti-ship ballistic missiles (ASBMs), anti-ship cruise missiles (ASCMs), submarines, surface ships, aircraft, and supporting C4ISR (command and control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance) systems.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 32 Department of Defence
    Defence Submission to the Standing Committee on State Development Inquiry into Defence Industry in New South Wales Summary 1. Defence welcomes the New South Wales (NSW) Government’s and Parliament’s interest in strengthening local defence industry to support Australia’s defence and national security. With the release of the 2016 Defence White Paper, Integrated Investment Program, and Defence Industry Policy Statement on 25 February 2016 and the Naval Shipbuilding Plan on 16 May 2017, there is clear direction to implement a major renewal of Defence capability and with it a strengthening of Australia’s defence industry. The scale and long-term nature of Defence’s requirements, including in areas such as the continuous naval shipbuilding programs, require a national approach and partnership between Defence and State and Territory Governments. 2. Australia’s industrial base is a fundamental enabler of Australia’s military capabilities, and an integral element of the nation’s defence. Defence welcomes the announcement of the NSW Government’s Defence and Industry Strategy – Strong, Smart and Connected and the establishment of Defence NSW. Defence also welcomes increasing collaboration between NSW and the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) in the defence sector. 3. Through new and expanded policies and programs, Defence is supporting Australia’s defence industry to develop the right technology, skills and capabilities to meet Defence’s current and future needs. There are considerable opportunities for local defence industry to contribute to Defence, with accompanying economic and community benefits. Ensuring that NSW businesses are aware of the opportunities and can leverage the support available from Defence and the broader Commonwealth is an important objective for collaboration between Defence, the NSW Government, and NSW industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Test and Evaluation, HMAS Canberra: Assessing the ADF’S New Maritime Role 2 Enhanced Capability
    Original Article Operational Test and Evaluation, HMAS Canberra: Assessing the ADF’s New Maritime Role 2 Enhanced Capability Commander Neil Westphalen, RANR Introduction However, although Canberra’s commissioning formally transferred responsibility for the ship from The first of two Landing Helicopter Dock (LHD) ships her builders to the RAN, she still required an Initial commissioned into the Royal Australian Navy (RAN) Operational Capability (IOC) evaluation� The purpose as HMAS Canberra (L02) on 28 November 2014�, of the evaluation was to assess the ADF’s ability to Among their other attributes, the LHDs bring a undertake amphibious Humanitarian Aid / Disaster Maritime Role 2 Enhanced (MR2E) seagoing health Relief (HA/DR) and Non-combatant Evacuation capability to the Australian Defence Force (ADF) Operations (NEO), at a level of capability that was for the first time, and with a significantly greater generally analogous to what had previously been capacity, since the Landing Platform Amphibious provided by the LPAs� This entailed an escalating (LPA) Fleet units HMA Ships Kanimbla and Manoora series of exercise-based and other assessments over decommissioned in 2011�, 12 months, which culminated in an Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E), conducted off Cowley Beach QLD, from 30 September to 05 October 2015� Canberra’s IOC evaluation is the prelude to a Full Operational Capability (FOC) evaluation, due to be conducted in October 2017� The purpose of the FOC evaluation will be to assess the ADF’s ability to undertake a range of higher
    [Show full text]
  • A New Carrier Race? Yoji Koda
    Naval War College Review Volume 64 Article 4 Number 3 Summer 2011 A New Carrier Race? Yoji Koda Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Koda, Yoji (2011) "A New Carrier Race?," Naval War College Review: Vol. 64 : No. 3 , Article 4. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol64/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen Koda: A New Carrier Race? A NEW CARRIER RACE? Strategy, Force Planning, and JS Hyuga Vice Admiral Yoji Koda, Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (Retired) n 18 March 2009 JS Hyuga (DDH 181) was commissioned and delivered to Othe Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (JMSDF). The unique characteris- tic of this ship is its aircraft-carrier-like design, with a “through” flight deck and an island on the starboard side. Hyuga was planned in the five-year Midterm De- fense Buildup Plan (MTDBP) of 2001 and funded in Japanese fiscal year (JFY) 2004 as the replacement for the aging first-generation helicopter-carrying de- stroyer (DDH), JS Haruna (DDH 141), which was to reach the end of its service life of thirty-five years in 2009. The second ship of the new class, JS Ise (DDH 182), of the JFY 2006 program, was commissioned 16 March 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • The Front Line of Our Nation's Modern Defense
    AMPHIBIOUS WARSHIPS THE FRONT LINE OF OUR NATION’S MODERN DEFENSE https://amphibiouswarship.org THE FUTURE OF AMPHIBIOUS WARSHIPS “ Capacity times capability times In 2018, the U.S. Navy announced a dock landing ship the F-35B Joint Strike Fighter and other new sources of data readiness equals lethality.” replacement program called LPD Flight II. The first LPD in high-end warfare, as well as increase the number and the Flight II amphibious warship will be LPD 30. Initiating readiness of amphibious warships in the fleet. — Major General David W. Coffman, Director Expeditionary Warfare (N95) the LPD Flight II program in FY18 takes advantage of a mature design, hot production line, and a stable AMPHIBIOUS WARSHIPS IN ACTION vendor base. LHA 8 will be the first ship reincorporating a well deck to enhance expeditionary war fighting Deployments in recent years have involved service such as: capabilities while maintaining principal aviation Global force for deterring threats and responding to crisis characteristics. LHA 8 is scheduled to be delivered Supporting U.S. combat operations in Afghanistan in 2024. Numerous hurricane relief and recovery efforts An Amphibious Warship Evolution Plan is currently in the works within the U.S. Navy’s expeditionary warfare Humanitarian assistance in several areas following community. The effort seeks to enable the San Antonio- natural disasters class docks to act as “prominent middle-weight fighters” Noncombatant Evacuation Operations (NEOs) in future naval battle. The plan seeks to upgrade the Tactical recovery of aircraft and personnel command and control and communications systems on AMPHIBIOUS WARSHIPS MAKE IT POSSIBLE FOR THE U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • China Naval Modernization: Implications for US Navy Capabilities
    China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities—Background and Issues for Congress Updated May 21, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL33153 China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities Summary In an era of renewed great power competition, China’s military modernization effort, including its naval modernization effort, has become the top focus of U.S. defense planning and budgeting. China’s navy, which China has been steadily modernizing for more than 25 years, since the early to mid-1990s, has become a formidable military force within China’s near-seas region, and it is conducting a growing number of operations in more-distant waters, including the broader waters of the Western Pacific, the Indian Ocean, and waters around Europe. China’s navy is viewed as posing a major challenge to the U.S. Navy’s ability to achieve and maintain wartime control of blue-water ocean areas in the Western Pacific—the first such challenge the U.S. Navy has faced since the end of the Cold War—and forms a key element of a Chinese challenge to the long- standing status of the United States as the leading military power in the Western Pacific. China’s naval modernization effort encompasses a wide array of platform and weapon acquisition programs, including anti-ship ballistic missiles (ASBMs), anti-ship cruise missiles (ASCMs), submarines, surface ships, aircraft, unmanned vehicles (UVs), and supporting C4ISR (command and control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance) systems. China’s naval modernization effort also includes improvements in maintenance and logistics, doctrine, personnel quality, education and training, and exercises.
    [Show full text]
  • CNA's Integrated Ship Database
    CNA’s Integrated Ship Database Second Quarter 2012 Update Gregory N. Suess • Lynette A. McClain CNA Interactive Software DIS-2012-U-003585-Final January 2013 Photo credit “Description: (Cropped Version) An aerial view of the aircraft carriers USS INDEPENDENCE (CV 62), left, and USS KITTY HAWK (CV 63), right, tied up at the same dock in preparation for the change of charge during the exercise RIMPAC '98. Location: PEARL HARBOR, HAWAII (HI) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (USA) The USS INDEPENDENCE was on its way to be decommissioned, it was previously home ported in Yokosuka, Japan. The crew from the USS INDEPENDENCE cross decked onto the USS KITTY HAWK and brought it back to Atsugi, Japan. The USS INDEPENDENCE was destined for a ship yard in Washington. Source: ID"DN-SD- 00-01114 / Service Depicted: Navy / 980717-N-3612M-001 / Operation / Series: RIMPAC `98. Author: Camera Operator: PH1(NAC) JAMES G. MCCARTER,” Jul. 17, 1998, WIKIMEDIA COMMONS, last accessed Dec. 20, 2012, at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:USS_Independence_(CV- 62)_and_USS_Kitty_Hawk_(CV-63)_at_Pearl_Harbor_crop.jpg Approved for distribution: January 2013 Dr. Barry Howell Director, Warfare Capabilities and Employment Team Operations and Tactics Analysis This document represents the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the Department of the Navy. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED. Copies of this document can be obtained through the Defense Technical Information Center at www.dtic.mil or contact CNA Document Control and Distribution Section at 703-824-2123. Copyright 2013 CNA This work was created in the performance of Federal Government Contract Number N00014-11-D-0323.
    [Show full text]
  • T He Indian Army Is Well Equipped with Modern
    Annual Report 2007-08 Ministry of Defence Government of India CONTENTS 1 The Security Environment 1 2 Organisation and Functions of The Ministry of Defence 7 3 Indian Army 15 4 Indian Navy 27 5 Indian Air Force 37 6 Coast Guard 45 7 Defence Production 51 8 Defence Research and Development 75 9 Inter-Service Organisations 101 10 Recruitment and Training 115 11 Resettlement and Welfare of Ex-Servicemen 139 12 Cooperation Between the Armed Forces and Civil Authorities 153 13 National Cadet Corps 159 14 Defence Cooperaton with Foreign Countries 171 15 Ceremonial and Other Activities 181 16 Activities of Vigilance Units 193 17. Empowerment and Welfare of Women 199 Appendices I Matters Dealt with by the Departments of the Ministry of Defence 205 II Ministers, Chiefs of Staff and Secretaries who were in position from April 1, 2007 onwards 209 III Summary of latest Comptroller & Auditor General (C&AG) Report on the working of Ministry of Defence 210 1 THE SECURITY ENVIRONMENT Troops deployed along the Line of Control 1 s the world continues to shrink and get more and more A interdependent due to globalisation and advent of modern day technologies, peace and development remain the central agenda for India.i 1.1 India’s security environment the deteriorating situation in Pakistan and continued to be infl uenced by developments the continued unrest in Afghanistan and in our immediate neighbourhood where Sri Lanka. Stability and peace in West Asia rising instability remains a matter of deep and the Gulf, which host several million concern. Global attention is shifting to the sub-continent for a variety of reasons, people of Indian origin and which is the ranging from fast track economic growth, primary source of India’s energy supplies, growing population and markets, the is of continuing importance to India.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles
    The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles The Chinese Navy Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles Saunders, EDITED BY Yung, Swaine, PhILLIP C. SAUNderS, ChrISToPher YUNG, and Yang MIChAeL Swaine, ANd ANdreW NIeN-dzU YANG CeNTer For The STUdY oF ChINeSe MilitarY AffairS INSTITUTe For NATIoNAL STrATeGIC STUdIeS NatioNAL deFeNSe UNIverSITY COVER 4 SPINE 990-219 NDU CHINESE NAVY COVER.indd 3 COVER 1 11/29/11 12:35 PM The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles 990-219 NDU CHINESE NAVY.indb 1 11/29/11 12:37 PM 990-219 NDU CHINESE NAVY.indb 2 11/29/11 12:37 PM The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles Edited by Phillip C. Saunders, Christopher D. Yung, Michael Swaine, and Andrew Nien-Dzu Yang Published by National Defense University Press for the Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs Institute for National Strategic Studies Washington, D.C. 2011 990-219 NDU CHINESE NAVY.indb 3 11/29/11 12:37 PM Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Defense or any other agency of the Federal Government. Cleared for public release; distribution unlimited. Chapter 5 was originally published as an article of the same title in Asian Security 5, no. 2 (2009), 144–169. Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. Used by permission. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Chinese Navy : expanding capabilities, evolving roles / edited by Phillip C. Saunders ... [et al.]. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Affairs May 2020
    Current Affairs – May 2020 Current Affairs ─ May 2020 This is a guide to provide you a precise summary and a huge collection of Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) covering national and international current affairs for the month of May 2020. This guide will help you in preparing for Indian competitive examinations like Bank PO, Banking, Railway, IAS, PCS, UPSC, CAT, GATE, CDS, NDA, MCA, MBA, Engineering, IBPS, Clerical Gradeand Officer Grade, etc. Audience Aspirants who are preparing for different competitive exams like Bank PO, Banking, Railway, IAS, PCS, UPSC, CAT, GATE, CDS, NDA, MCA, MBA, Engineering, IBPS, Clerical Grade, Officer Grade, etc. Even though you are not preparing for any exams but are willing to have news encapsulated in a roll, which you can walk through within 30 minutes, then we have put all the major points for the whole month in a precise and interesting way. Copyright and Disclaimer Copyright 2020 by Tutorials Point (I) Pvt. Ltd. All the content and graphics published in this e-book are the property of Tutorials Point (I) Pvt. Ltd. The user of this e-book is prohibited to reuse, retain, copy, distribute or republish any contents or a part of contents of this e-book in any manner without written consent of the publisher. We strive to update the contents of our website and tutorials as timely and as precisely as possible, however, the contents may contain inaccuracies or errors. Tutorials Point (I) Pvt. Ltd. provides no guarantee regarding the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of our website or its contents including this tutorial.
    [Show full text]