Environmental Impact Assessment – Appendix 8.1: Heritage Statement 163390-JAC-REP-EEN-000007 Revision A04
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
OFFICIAL Network Rail Oxford Corridor Phase 2 Capacity Improvement Scheme Environmental Impact Assessment – Appendix 8.1: Heritage Statement 163390-JAC-REP-EEN-000007 Revision A04 Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 Network Rail Oxford Corridor Phase 2 Capacity Improvement Scheme Environmental Impact Assessment – Appendix 8.1: Heritage Statement Document Reference 163390-JAC-REP-EEN-000007 Author Jacobs Date June 2021 Revision Number A04 OFFICIAL Network Rail Oxford Corridor Phase 2 Capacity Improvement Scheme Environmental Impact Assessment – Appendix 8.1: Heritage Statement 163390-JAC-REP-EEN-000007 Revision A04 Environmental Impact Assessment – Appendix 8.1: Heritage Statement Document Version Control V Version Date Author Reviewer Approver A01 Apr 2020 R. McNaught S. Griffin L. Anastassiades A02 May 2020 R. McNaught S. Griffin M. Gralewski A03 Jul 2020 R. McNaught S. Griffin M. Gralewski A04 Jun 2021 R. McNaught S. Griffin A. Naik Report for: Authored by: Network Rail Jacobs Western Route 1180 Eskdale Rd Western House Winnersh 1 Holbrook Way Reading Swindon RG41 5TU SN11BD © Copyright 2021 . The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Network Rail. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of Network Rail, and for the exclusive use of Network Rail, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the Network Rail. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. 2 OFFICIAL Network Rail Oxford Corridor Phase 2 Capacity Improvement Scheme Environmental Impact Assessment – Appendix 8.1: Heritage Statement 163390-JAC-REP-EEN-000007 Revision A04 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 2. LEGISLATIVE AND POLICY BACKGROUND ................................................... 2 2.1 National Policy ............................................................................................. 2 2.2 National Guidance ....................................................................................... 2 3. GEOLOGY AND TOPOGRAPHY ....................................................................... 5 3.2 Geology ....................................................................................................... 5 3.3 Topography .................................................................................................. 5 4. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................ 6 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 6 4.2 Study Area ................................................................................................... 6 4.3 Data Sources ............................................................................................... 6 4.4 Assessment of Value of Heritage Assets ..................................................... 7 5. BASELINE CONDITIONS ................................................................................... 8 5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 8 5.2 Archaeological Remains .............................................................................. 8 5.3 Historic Buildings ....................................................................................... 15 5.4 Historic Landscape .................................................................................... 21 6. POTENTIAL FOR IMPACTS ............................................................................ 25 6.1 Construction ............................................................................................... 25 6.2 Operation ................................................................................................... 26 7. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................... 27 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... 28 i OFFICIAL Network Rail Oxford Corridor Phase 2 Capacity Improvement Scheme Environmental Impact Assessment – Appendix 8.1: Heritage Statement 163390-JAC-REP-EEN-000007 Revision A04 Tables Table A5.1: Summary of archaeological remains ................................................................... 8 Table A5.2: Summary of historic buildings ............................................................................ 15 Table A5.3: Summary of historic urban character areas ....................................................... 21 Plates Plate A 5.1: Botley Road pedestrian tunnel (Asset 102) ....................................................... 20 ii OFFICIAL Network Rail Oxford Corridor Phase 2 Capacity Improvement Scheme Environmental Impact Assessment – Appendix 8.1: Heritage Statement 163390-JAC-REP-EEN-000007 Revision A04 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1.1 This Heritage Statement assesses the value of the baseline heritage assets within 200m of the red line boundary of the Oxford Corridor Phase 2 Capacity Improvement Scheme (hereafter known as the Scheme). It also outlines the potential impacts on them and identifies any additional surveys or works required. 1.1.2 This Heritage Statement is a detailed study of available baseline data and includes information on non-designated assets obtained from the Oxford Historic Environment Record. The baseline supports the Historic Environment Chapter 8 within Volume 2 of the Environmental Statement. The appendix is supported by Figures 8.1, 8.2 and 8.3 within Volume 3 and Appendix 1.5 – Glossary and Acronyms within Volume 4. Page 1 of 28 OFFICIAL Network Rail Oxford Corridor Phase 2 Capacity Improvement Scheme Environmental Impact Assessment – Appendix 8.1: Heritage Statement 163390-JAC-REP-EEN-000007 Revision A04 2. LEGISLATIVE AND POLICY BACKGROUND 2.1 National Policy Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979 2.1.1 Scheduled Monuments are, of national importance and are protected by law. It is a criminal offence to damage a Scheduled Monument. Consent (known as Scheduled Monument Consent) must be obtained from the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport before any works affecting a Scheduled Monument may take place. Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 2.1.2 Listed Buildings are recognised to be of special architectural or historic interest. Under the 1990 Act, planning authorities are instructed to have special regard to the desirability of preserving a Listed Building, its setting, or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses. The 1990 Act outlines the duty for local planning authorities to designate ‘areas of special architectural or historic interest, the appearance or character of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance’. These are known as Conservation Areas. Historic Buildings and Ancient Monuments Act 1953 2.1.3 The 1953 Act conferred powers on Historic England to create a register of Historic Parks and Gardens which are assessed to be of special historic interest. Inclusion of a site on the register does not confer any additional legal protection of the site. It does however make the effect caused by a proposed development on the sites and their settings a material consideration in relation to the development. 2.2 National Guidance National Planning Policy Framework 2.2.1 National planning policies concerning the conservation of the historic environment are set out in Section 16 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government (MHCLG), 2019). Although the Scheme does not need to obtain planning permission, the NPPF has been used as guidance for the assessment. 2.2.2 The NPPF recognises that heritage assets are an irreplaceable resource which should be conserved in a manner appropriate to their archaeological significance. Archaeological significance (hereafter referred to as ‘value’) is defined by the Glossary on page 71 of the NPPF, as 'the value of a heritage Page 2 of 28 OFFICIAL Network Rail Oxford Corridor Phase 2 Capacity Improvement Scheme Environmental Impact Assessment – Appendix 8.1: Heritage Statement 163390-JAC-REP-EEN-000007 Revision A04 asset to this and future generations because of its heritage interest'. For the purposes of this report, the term ‘value’ will be employed. This is to avoid confusion with the terminology for Environmental Impact Assessment ‘likely significance effect’. This value may be related to archaeological, architectural and artistic or historic interest, and may also derive from the setting of the asset. 2.2.3 Under Paragraph 189 of the NPPF, applicants for planning permission are required to provide a description of the value of any affected heritage assets and their settings in sufficient detail to understand the potential impact of the proposal on them. 2.2.4 When determining planning applications, Paragraph 192 of the NPPF instructs local planning authorities to take into account: • “the desirability of sustaining and enhancing the (archaeological) significance (value) of heritage assets and putting them to viable uses consistent with their conservation; • the positive contribution that conservation of heritage