The Eriophyid Plant Mites of South Dakota

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Eriophyid Plant Mites of South Dakota South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Technical Bulletins SDSU Agricultural Experiment Station 1976 The rE iophyid Plant Mites of South Dakota Magdalena L. Briones Burruss McDaniel Follow this and additional works at: http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/agexperimentsta_tb Recommended Citation Briones, Magdalena L. and McDaniel, Burruss, "The rE iophyid Plant Mites of South Dakota" (1976). Technical Bulletins. Paper 7. http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/agexperimentsta_tb/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the SDSU Agricultural Experiment Station at Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Technical Bulletins by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Erlophyid Plant Mites •• So•th Dakota Contents Page . INTRODUCTION ..... ..... .. .... ...... ...... ..... ...... .... .... ....... .... ... .. 5 SYSTEMATIC RELATIONSHIP OF ER!OPIIYOIDEA TO OTHER ACARI ....... ....... ... ........................................... 8 . GENERAL MORPHOLOGY OF ERIOPHYID \!!TES . ........... HJ . .. LIFE HISTORY OF ERIOPHYID MITES ..... ....... ........... ...... 13 DISTRIBUTION AN D HOST RELATIOl'iSHIP ................... .... 14 15 \IATERIALS AND METHODS ............. ..................... .......... 15 Preservation \lethods for Eriophyoidea .. ..... ....... .... ... ........ �1ountant and J\-lounting Technique for Eriophyoidca ......... 15 \Ieasnrenient of the Parts ....................... ................................. 17 Count of Abdon1inal i\nnuli or Rings anfl L.ocation of Seta ..... ......................... ....................................................... 17 . Type and l:'ara!ype Slides ............ ...... .................................... 17 SYSTE\IATIC ACCOVNT OF THE ERIOPHYIDS . OF SOUTH DAKOTA . .. ......................... .. .......................... 18 Key lo the Eriophyoidea .. .... .... ................ ............ ....... ............ 18 Genus: Ahacarus ........................ ........................ ,.................... 19 Abacarns hystrix (Nal.) ................................................. 19 .. Genus: licarelliptus . .... ...... ........,....... ............ ...... .. 20 . Acarelliptus occidentalis K. ... ....... .. ............ ........... 20 Genus: Aculodes .......... ............. ............................................... 21 Aculodes dubius (Na!.) ................................. ................ 21 Aculorles mckenz.ie ( K.) ............................ ........... 21 .. Genus: Aculops ...... .... ................. .. .............. ......................... 22 Aculops laevigatae (Has.) .............................................. 22 Aculops lobuliferns K. ................................................... 24 . .... .... Aculops maximilianae n. sp. .... ... ...... ............ ... 25 Aculops toxicoplwgus (Ewing) ... .. .. .... .. .. .... .. ........ ......... 26 Genus: Aculus ........ ........ ........ .................................... ...... 27 Aculus cornutus (Banks) ................................... ...... ...... 28 Aculus nigrus K. ................... '" .......,. ...... 28 ... Aculus schlectendali (Nal.) . ....... ..... ................. 29 i TABLE OF COKTEKTS (COKT'Il) Page Genus: Anthocoples ..... ........... ..... ... ....... .... 29 .4..nthocoptes hakeri K. ........... ..................................... 29 /\nthocoptes punctfrlorsa K . ................. ...................... :.io (;en us: C alepitri1neru s ....................................... ,,.... .. 30 Calepitrinierus baileyi K . ........................................... 31 Calepitrimerus vitis K (:\Jal.).......................... ,,,, ,.,,,,,,,,. ,31 . ... .... .. Genus: (,'eci(loph ues .. .. ... .. .. .. ....... .. ... :32 Cecidophyes collegiatus K ....... ,,,, .... ,,,, ..... .. .... .... .. .... 32 Cecidophyes pusilla K, ......... .. ............ ..... 32 . .. .... ....... (;enus: .E,'.riophyes ... ....... .. .... .. 33 r;rlophycs arceosa n. sp. ... ... .......... ... .. 33 Eriophyes calaceris (K,),,.,, ..,, .. ,,.. ,,,, ,,. ,.. ,, .. ..... ,, . ,,...... :J7 l•:rioph!JeS celtis Kendall .................... .. ....................... 38 Eriophyes chondriplwra (K,) ................................... .. :34 F.rfrqJ/1yes douglasiana (\.Yilson and Oldfield) ............ 39 f�riophues rnack1ei (K.) .,..... .. .. ...... ,...... .. .. ..... ........ .... ,, :39 Eriophues uiori K. ............. .. .... ... ..... ,, ..... ...... 41 f�;riophyes neuarlernisiae (K.) ....................................... 42 Eriophyes puru11opuli (K.) ............................................ 44 Eriophyes parulmi (K,) ........ ... 44 f:riophyes tulipae K. ......................... .......................... .. 44 f:riophyes tay/ori lL sp .........................,, . .... .. ......... 47 Eriophyes ulnli ((;clrn1an) .............. 48 (�enu:-,: ?-.Jesolox ...................................................... 48 :\frsolox tuttlei K. .. ..... ... ... ...... .. .. ... .................. , 48 (;cnus: J)hullocoptes ............ ....... ........ 49 F)hyllocoptes arceuthi K. ................................... ....... ,19 l'hyllocople.1 didelphis K. ............................................ .. 50 Pltyllor:optcs nlicrospinatus �-Ldl ............. ,51 l'hyllocoptes slinkardcnsii K. .......... .. 51 (;cnt1s: Platur>hutoptus .......... Platuphutoptus sal;iriiana K. ..................................... Genus: \lasates ....................... ........................... ................ \7asates- quaclripe<fes Shiiner ....................................... \:rasates gleditsiae K. .................................................... Genus: Phuto,,tus .................................................. .. Phutoptus brownci (K.) ........ ..................................... F1lq1toptus ernarginatae (!\:.) ...................................... .. 53 Phutoptus prunillernissae (K.) ..... ....... ........ .......... ....... ii TABLE OF CO!\TE!\TS (CO'JT'D) Page Genus: 'l'egonotus .............. , ....... ................... .... ..... ..... .. ........ 57 Tegonotus aescul(foliae (K.) ......................................... .57 'l'egonotus lin(lenus n. s1>. ............................... 58 (;enus: 'fetra ........... ,,,. ... .. .... ...... ............ ................. .......... 59 1"etra 1ncllanieli n.. sp . ................................................. 59 Genus: Rhyncaphytoptus ....................................................... 60 Rhyncaphytupt11s atlant-ic-us K . .................................... 61 Rhyncaphytoptus strigatus K . ..................................... 61 l�enus: IJiptacus ................................................................... .,, 61 Diptacus pengsonae n. sp . ........................................... 62 l�enus: l)hy to co ptella .............................. ,,... ...... ..... 63 Phytocol'tella rot11ndu.1· (Hall) ......................... 63 SU\l\!AHY ................................................... ... ... ...... 65 HEFERENCES ClTEll ......................................................... 67 APPE'.\lllX ............. ............ .... ..................... ........ ......... ................ 71 Syrnhols l!se<l in Plates <tnd li'igures ......... ""····.. , ,,,,,. .. .. 71 Plates 1 through .52, heginning on ...................... .............. 72 List and Explanation of Figures in Plates (Appendix) Plate l. Fig. l-5. Anthocopte.r p11nctidorsa K. 1-2, adult mite, lateral and venrral aspects of whole ferr1ale. 3, samt\ an{erior dorsal view showing shield pattern, sctac and tergal microtubercles. '1-5, rnale, dorsal and ventral aspects of whole mite. .. ...... .. .... .... .... .... ..... 7 2 Plate 2. Fig. 1-2. Abacarus h_ystrix (NaL) 1, adult mite, dorsal view shovving shield patterni lateral shield granulations and part of rnid-dorsal rrough on anterior abdomen. 2, anterior vencral view of female Inire showing coxal pattern and sctae� and genitalia and setac. ... ................... 73 Plate 2. Fig. .?-4. Rh_vnc?tpbytoptus strigatus K. 3i lareral vieV1.1of fcrnale showing semi-lateral shield pattern and setaei and the long chelicerae. 4, lateral view of caudal aspect showing microtuberclcs and annulations. 7 _) Plate 3. Fig. 1-4. 11.tare!lipt11s occidenta!is K. l-2, dorsal viev,1of fen1alc n1ite sho\ving lareral longitudinal furrows on each side, and deflex cauda. _3, ventral viev.· of female sho\ving the genitalia, abdominal setae and <leflex cauda. 4, featherclaw. ............ ................. 74 Plate 4. Fig. l_-2. Aculodes dubiuJ K. l,adulr mite, anterior dorsal view shov."ing shield setac an<l pattern, and laceral granulations. 2. ventral view shov.•ing coxal setae and female genitalia. '"«............ ....... .. ..... ... 75 Plate 4. Fig. 3-4. !l.m/odes mckmzie fK.). 3, dorsal view of fomale sho\ving shield pattern and setae. 4, lateral view showing lateral shield granulations, and 1nicrotubercles. .................. 75 List and Explanation of Figures in Plates (Cont'd) Page Plate 5. Fig. 1 �6. l\culopslaevigatae (Has.) 1-2, dorsal and ventral view of procogyne mite. 3, !aceral view of possibly fernale sorrn between pro­ togync and dcutogyne stage. 4, venrral caudal view of protogync. 5, anterior dorsal viev.· of another suspected deutogyne form showing
Recommended publications
  • THE ERIOPHYID MITES of CALIFORNIA (Acarina: Eriophyidae) by H
    BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY VOLUME 2, NO. 1 THE ERIOPHYID MITES OF CALIFORNIA (Acarina: Eriophyidae) BY H. H. KEIFER (California Scare Department of Agriculture) UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES 1352 BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY Editors: E. 0. Essig, S. B. Freeborn, E. G. Linsley, R. L. Usinger Volume 2, No. 1, pp. 1-128, plates 1-39 Submitted by Editors, May 6, 1952 Issued December 12, 1952 Price $2.00 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON, ENGLAND PRINTED BY OFFSET IN THE UNITED STATBS OF AMERICA Contents Page Introduction .......................... 1 Hostlist ........................... 5 Keys to Genera. Species. and higher Groups ...........11 Discussion of Species ..................... 20 Bib 1iography .......................... 62 Host index ........................... 64 List of comn names ...................... 67 Index to mites. Genera. Species. etc .............. 08 Plate symbols ......................... 71 List of plates ......................... 72 Plates ............................. 74 THE ERIOPHYID MITES OF CALIFORNIA Introduction ’IhisBulletin is the result of fifteen years would classify these mites at the present, faces of intermittent exploration of California for the prospect of a growing number of species in the Friophyid mites. hhen the work began in 1937 the large genera, and of broad revisions to come. But principal species recognized were the relatively I believe the average type of Eriophyid to have al- few economic species. ‘Ihis situation not only left ready been pretty well defined, since these mites an opportunity to discover and describe new spe- are widespread, and ancient in origin. cies, it also demanded that as many new Eriophyids As we now know these tiny creatures, they con- as possible be put in print in order to erect a stitute a closed group, structurally pointing to taxonomic framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Entomopathogenic Fungi and Bacteria in a Veterinary Perspective
    biology Review Entomopathogenic Fungi and Bacteria in a Veterinary Perspective Valentina Virginia Ebani 1,2,* and Francesca Mancianti 1,2 1 Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy; [email protected] 2 Interdepartmental Research Center “Nutraceuticals and Food for Health”, University of Pisa, via del Borghetto 80, 56124 Pisa, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-050-221-6968 Simple Summary: Several fungal species are well suited to control arthropods, being able to cause epizootic infection among them and most of them infect their host by direct penetration through the arthropod’s tegument. Most of organisms are related to the biological control of crop pests, but, more recently, have been applied to combat some livestock ectoparasites. Among the entomopathogenic bacteria, Bacillus thuringiensis, innocuous for humans, animals, and plants and isolated from different environments, showed the most relevant activity against arthropods. Its entomopathogenic property is related to the production of highly biodegradable proteins. Entomopathogenic fungi and bacteria are usually employed against agricultural pests, and some studies have focused on their use to control animal arthropods. However, risks of infections in animals and humans are possible; thus, further studies about their activity are necessary. Abstract: The present study aimed to review the papers dealing with the biological activity of fungi and bacteria against some mites and ticks of veterinary interest. In particular, the attention was turned to the research regarding acarid species, Dermanyssus gallinae and Psoroptes sp., which are the cause of severe threat in farm animals and, regarding ticks, also pets.
    [Show full text]
  • Mite Fauna (Arachnida: Acari) on Peach Cultivars in Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil
    Journal of Plant Studies; Vol. 1, No. 2; 2012 ISSN 1927-0461 E-ISSN 1927-047X Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Mite Fauna (Arachnida: Acari) on Peach Cultivars in Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil Sônia Maria Nalesso Marangoni Montes1, Adalton Raga2, Aparecida Conceição Boliani3, Jeferson Luiz de Carvalho Mineiro2 & Pedro César dos Santos3 1 Sao Paulo State Agency of Technology Agribusiness-APTA, Regional Alta Sorocabana, Route Raposo Tavares km 561, Box 298, Presidente Prudente, SP 19015-970, Brazil 2 APTA- Biological Institute, Avenue Heitor Penteado km 3, Box 70 Campinas, SP 13001-970, Brazil 3 Paulist State University-UNESP, Campus de Ilha Solteira, Avenue Brasil, 56, Ilha Solteira, SP 15385-000, Brazil Correspondence: Sônia Maria Nalesso Marangoni Montes, Sao Paulo State Agency of Technology Agribusiness-APTA, Regional Alta Sorocabana Route Raposo Tavares km 561, Box 298, Presidente Prudente, SP 19015-970, Brazil. Tel: 55-18-3222-0732. E-mail: [email protected] Received: March 15, 2012 Accepted: May 20, 2012 Online Published: September 1, 2012 doi: 10.5539/jps.v1n2p173 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jps.v1n2p173 Research supported by FAPESP (Processo nº05/55649-5) Abstract This study aimed to determine the mite diversity, population dynamics and to conduct a fauna analysis in plantations from four peach varieties established in the municipality of Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil. The mite fauna from ‘Jóia 4’, ‘Ouromel 3’, ‘Regis’ and ‘Rei da conserva’ cultivars over the rootstock Okinawa were determined from December 2002 to February 2006. Samples composed by 72 leaves were collected fortnightly from upper, middle and lower third of each tree and four trees per cultivar.
    [Show full text]
  • Apiaceae (Pimp
    Živné rostliny Druh vlnovníka, jeho bionomie Poznámka Živné rostliny polyfágních druhů Miříkovité – Apiaceae T Eriophyes peucedani (Pimpinella, Selinum aj.) Brukvovité – Brassicaceae T Aceria drabae (Cardaria, Capsella, Lepidium aj.) Lipnicovité – Poaceae K Aceria tenuis (Avena, Bromus, Dactylis aj.) Živné rostliny ostatních (steno- a monofágních) druhů jedle K Trisetacus floricolus (Abies) javor E Aceria carinifex, P Aceria cephalonea, O Aceria heteronyx, (Acer) P Aceria macrochela, E Aceria macrocheluserinea, P Aceria macrorhyncha, P Aceria myriadeum, E Aceria platanoidea, E Aceria pseudoplatani, A Aceria vermicularis, E Aculops aceris, P Aculops acericola, E Cecidophyes gymnaspis řebříček T Aceria kiefferi (Achillea) jírovec E Aculus hippocastani (Aesculus) zběhovec T Aceria ajugae (Ajuga) česnek N Aceria tulipae (Allium) olše E Acalitus brevitarsus, P Acalitus phyllereus, (Alnus) P Acaricalus trinotus, T Aceria longirostris, E Aceria nalepai, P Eriophyes alniincanae, E Eriophyes euryporus, P Eriophyes inangulis, P Eriophyes laevis pilát K Anthocoptes aspidophorus (Anchusa) pelyněk T Aceria artemisiae, T Aceria horrida, T Aceria subtilis (Artemisia) bukvice T Aceria solida (Betonica) bříza V Acalitus calycophthirus, E Acalitus longisetosus, (Betula) P Acalitus notolius, E Acalitus rudis, P Cecidophyopsis betulae, E Eriophyes leionotus, P Eriophyes lissonotus sveřep K Aculodes dubius (Bromus) zimostráz V Eriophyes canestrinii, P Eriophyes hypophyllus (Buxus) zvonek P Aceria campanulae, T Aculus schmardae (Campanula) habr E Aceria tenella,
    [Show full text]
  • Population Growth Rate of Dry Bulb Mite, <I>Aceria Tulipae</I>
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology Entomology, Department of 2017 Population growth rate of dry bulb mite, Aceria tulipae (Acariformes: Eriophyidae), on agriculturally important plants and implications for its taxonomic status Agnieszka Kiedrowicz Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland, [email protected] Brian G. Rector Great Basin Rangelands Research Unit, USDA-ARS, [email protected] Suzanne Lommen University of Fribourg, Switzerland, [email protected] Lechosław Kuczyński Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland Wiktoria Szydło University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub Part of the Entomology Commons Kiedrowicz, Agnieszka; Rector, Brian G.; Lommen, Suzanne; Kuczyński, Lechosław; Szydło, Wiktoria; and Skoracka, Anna, "Population growth rate of dry bulb mite, Aceria tulipae (Acariformes: Eriophyidae), on agriculturally important plants and implications for its taxonomic status" (2017). Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology. 624. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub/624 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Agnieszka Kiedrowicz, Brian G. Rector, Suzanne Lommen, Lechosław Kuczyński, Wiktoria Szydło, and Anna Skoracka This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub/ 624 Exp Appl Acarol (2017) 73:1–10 DOI 10.1007/s10493-017-0173-3 Population growth rate of dry bulb mite, Aceria tulipae (Acariformes: Eriophyidae), on agriculturally important plants and implications for its taxonomic status 1 2 3,4 Agnieszka Kiedrowicz • Brian G.
    [Show full text]
  • VINEYARD BIODIVERSITY and INSECT INTERACTIONS! ! - Establishing and Monitoring Insectariums! !
    ! VINEYARD BIODIVERSITY AND INSECT INTERACTIONS! ! - Establishing and monitoring insectariums! ! Prepared for : GWRDC Regional - SA Central (Adelaide Hills, Currency Creek, Kangaroo Island, Langhorne Creek, McLaren Vale and Southern Fleurieu Wine Regions) By : Mary Retallack Date : August 2011 ! ! ! !"#$%&'(&)'*!%*!+& ,- .*!/'01)!.'*&----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&2 3-! "&(')1+&'*&4.*%5"/0&#.'0.4%/+.!5&-----------------------------------------------------------------------------&6! ! &ABA <%5%+3!C0-72D0E2!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!F! &A&A! ;D,!*2!G*0.*1%-2*3,!*HE0-3#+3I!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!J! &AKA! ;#,2!0L!%+D#+5*+$!G*0.*1%-2*3,!*+!3D%!1*+%,#-.!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!B&! 7- .*+%)!"/.18+&--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&,2! ! ! KABA ;D#3!#-%!*+2%53#-*MH2I!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!BN! KA&A! O3D%-!C#,2!0L!L0-H*+$!#!2M*3#G8%!D#G*3#3!L0-!G%+%L*5*#82!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!&P! KAKA! ?%8%53*+$!3D%!-*$D3!2E%5*%2!30!E8#+3!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!&B! 9- :$"*!.*;&5'1/&.*+%)!"/.18&-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&3<!
    [Show full text]
  • Ilias Saxelmwifo Universitetis Entomologiisa Da Biokontrolis Kvleviti Centri Entomology and Biocontrol Research Centre of Ilia State University
    ilias saxelmwifo universitetis entomologiisa da biokontrolis kvleviTi centri Entomology and Biocontrol Research Centre of Ilia State University თეა არაბული Tea Arabuli ვაზის მავნებელი ტეტრანიხისებრი (Acari: Tetranychoidea) ტკიპები Vitis Pest Tetranychoid (Acari: Tetranychoidea) Mites ნაშრომი დაფინანსდა შოთა რუსთაველის ეროვნული სამეცნიეერო ფონდის მიერ. გრანტი N 2-2/05 The monograph was financed by Sota Rustaveli national scientific fond SRNSF. grant N 2-2/05 გამომცემლობა ”უნივერსალი” Pulishing House “UNIVERSAL” თბილისი - Tbilisi 2011 უდკ (UDC) ე თბილისი 0179, ჭავჭავაძის გამზ. 31. ტელ. 220164 Tbilisi 0179, Chavchavadze avenieu 31. Tel.: 995 32 220164 www.iliauni.edu.ge რედაქტორი: ერისტო ყვავაძე ბიოლოგიის მეცნიერებათა დოქტორი Editor: Eristo Kvavadze Doctor of Biological Sciences © თ. არაბული გამომცემლობა ”უნივერსალი”, 2011 თბილისი, ჭავჭავაძის გამზ. 19, ტელ: 22 36 09, 8(99) 17 22 30 E-mail: [email protected] ISBN 978-9941-12-507-2 2 შ ი ნ ა ა რ ს ი 1. შესავალი 2. მავნებელი ტეტრანიხისებრი ტკიპების შესწავლის ისტორია, მრავალფეროვნება და გავრცელება 3. ვაზის კულტურა საქართველოში და ტეტრანიხისებრი ტკიპების მავნებლობა 4. მასალა და მეთოდიკა 1. საიტების დახასიათება 2. მასალის შეგროვება 3. პრეპარატების მომზადება და რკვევა 5. საკუთარი გამოკვლევები: 1. კახეთის რეგიონის ვაზის მავნებელი ტეტრანიხისებრი (Acari: Tetranychoidea) ტკიპები 2. Eotetranychus pruni - ის და მისი ბუნებრივი მტრის (Phytoseius plumifer) რიცხოვნების დინამიკა ვაზზე 3. ვაზზე აღრიცხული უხერხემლო ცხოველები და მათი როლი 6. დასკვნა 7. ციტირებული ლიტერატურა 3 შ ე ს ა ვ ა ლ ი ტეტრანიხისებრი ტკიპები (Tetranychoidea) ობობასნაირთა კლასს განეკუთვნებიან, ისინი ფართოდ არიან გავრცელებულნი მთელს დედამიწაზე, გვხვდებიან ყველგან სადაც ყვავილოვანი მცენარეები იზრდება და წარმოადგენენ ხილის, ბოსტნეულის, მარცვლოვანი კულტურების, დეკორატიული და ველურად მოზარდი მცენარეების საშიშ მავნებლებს. მცენარეების პარაზიტი ტეტრანიხისებრი ტკიპები მცირე ზომის (0,40-0,5 მმ), სუსტად ქიტინიზებული საფარველის მქონე ცხოველებია, რომელთა დანახვა ბუნებრივ პირობებში შეუიარაღებელი თვალით შეუძლებელია.
    [Show full text]
  • Virus Del Mosaico Estriado Del Trigo
    DIRECCIÓN GENERAL DE SANIDAD VEGETAL DIRECCIÓN DEL CENTRO NACIONAL DE REFERENCIA FITOSANITARIA FICHA TÉCNICA Virus del mosaico estriado del trigo Lapierre y Hariri, 2008. Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV) DIRECCIÓN GENERAL DE SANIDAD VEGETAL DIRECCIÓN DEL CENTRO NACIONAL DE REFERENCIA FITOSANITARIA CONTENIDO IDENTIDAD .................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Nombre científico ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Sinónimos .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Clasificación taxonómica ....................................................................................................................... 1 Nombres comunes .................................................................................................................................... 1 IMPORTANCIA ECONÓMICA DE LA PLAGA .................................................................................................................. 1 SITUACIÓN EN MÉXICO ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 DISTRIBUCIÓN MUNDIAL.....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eriophyoid Mite Fauna (Acari: Trombidiformes: Eriophyoidea) of Turkey: New Species, New Distribution Reports and an Updated Catalogue
    Zootaxa 3991 (1): 001–063 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3991.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AA47708E-6E3E-41D5-9DC3-E9D77EAB9C9E ZOOTAXA 3991 Eriophyoid mite fauna (Acari: Trombidiformes: Eriophyoidea) of Turkey: new species, new distribution reports and an updated catalogue EVSEL DENIZHAN1, ROSITA MONFREDA2, ENRICO DE LILLO2,4 & SULTAN ÇOBANOĞLU3 1Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Yüzüncü Yıl, Van, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences (Di.S.S.P.A.), section of Entomology and Zoology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, via Amendola, 165/A, I–70126 Bari, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 3Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ankara, Dıskapı, 06110 Ankara, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected] 4Corresponding author Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by D. Knihinicki: 21 May 2015; published: 29 Jul. 2015 EVSEL DENIZHAN, ROSITA MONFREDA, ENRICO DE LILLO & SULTAN ÇOBANOĞLU Eriophyoid mite fauna (Acari: Trombidiformes: Eriophyoidea) of Turkey: new species, new distribution reports and an updated catalogue (Zootaxa 3991) 63 pp.; 30 cm. 29 Jul. 2015 ISBN 978-1-77557-751-5 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77557-752-2 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2015 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2015 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological History and Phylogeny of Chelicerata
    Arthropod Structure & Development 39 (2010) 124–142 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Arthropod Structure & Development journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/asd Review Article Geological history and phylogeny of Chelicerata Jason A. Dunlop* Museum fu¨r Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Research on Evolution and Biodiversity at the Humboldt University Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany article info abstract Article history: Chelicerata probably appeared during the Cambrian period. Their precise origins remain unclear, but may Received 1 December 2009 lie among the so-called great appendage arthropods. By the late Cambrian there is evidence for both Accepted 13 January 2010 Pycnogonida and Euchelicerata. Relationships between the principal euchelicerate lineages are unre- solved, but Xiphosura, Eurypterida and Chasmataspidida (the last two extinct), are all known as body Keywords: fossils from the Ordovician. The fourth group, Arachnida, was found monophyletic in most recent studies. Arachnida Arachnids are known unequivocally from the Silurian (a putative Ordovician mite remains controversial), Fossil record and the balance of evidence favours a common, terrestrial ancestor. Recent work recognises four prin- Phylogeny Evolutionary tree cipal arachnid clades: Stethostomata, Haplocnemata, Acaromorpha and Pantetrapulmonata, of which the pantetrapulmonates (spiders and their relatives) are probably the most robust grouping. Stethostomata includes Scorpiones (Silurian–Recent) and Opiliones (Devonian–Recent), while
    [Show full text]
  • NHBSS 034 2F Boonkong Inse
    Nat. Nat. HlST.BuLL. SlAM お C. 3 4( 2): 105-113 ,1986. INSECTS AND MITES FOUND ON STORED GARLIC IN THAILAND Suthasanee Suthasanee Boonkong* , Charlya Le kprayoon* and Wi na Meckvichai* ABSTRACT Sam ples of garlic bulbs from 6 storages in 3 pro' 吋ncesinno 此h町 nτbailand w釘 e ∞H阿国and examined 儒 ch month from Au 忠誠 1983 to June 1984. It was found the storage damage damage increased with time and was significantly different among storages. 百le major major causes of damage to garlic bulbs were 泊sects 田 d mites. Of Of 14 genera of insec 白隠ountered ,Las ioderma serricome (F abricius) ,A ra e(朋 6 f町制'Iaoo De geer and 砂 'hestio cautella (W alker) were most fr ,伺 uently found. Tw enty genera genera of mites were also identified 回 d among these ,Aceria tulipae (K eifer) was the most most destructive species. INTRODUCTION Garlic Garlic (Allium SIσ tivum L.), Family Liliaceae ,is known 部 a traditional medicinal plant. plant. For many centuries ,man has used the roots , the bulbs and the leaves of of many varieties of garlic ,prep 釘 ed in many ways ,either fresh or dried , alone or in combination combination with other substances such as water ,vinegar and honey. In a number of forms forms garlic has served as an amulet or as food , condiment or medicine. The English Pharmacopia Pharmacopia of 1949listed garlic as an antiseptic ,diaphroretic ,diuretic expectorant , and and also noted that garlic h踏切en 凶 ed to fight tuberculosis. 官leSp 創出h Pharmacopia of of 1954 also listed garlic among its drugs.
    [Show full text]
  • Araneae (Spider) Photos
    Araneae (Spider) Photos Araneae (Spiders) About Information on: Spider Photos of Links to WWW Spiders Spiders of North America Relationships Spider Groups Spider Resources -- An Identification Manual About Spiders As in the other arachnid orders, appendage specialization is very important in the evolution of spiders. In spiders the five pairs of appendages of the prosoma (one of the two main body sections) that follow the chelicerae are the pedipalps followed by four pairs of walking legs. The pedipalps are modified to serve as mating organs by mature male spiders. These modifications are often very complicated and differences in their structure are important characteristics used by araneologists in the classification of spiders. Pedipalps in female spiders are structurally much simpler and are used for sensing, manipulating food and sometimes in locomotion. It is relatively easy to tell mature or nearly mature males from female spiders (at least in most groups) by looking at the pedipalps -- in females they look like functional but small legs while in males the ends tend to be enlarged, often greatly so. In young spiders these differences are not evident. There are also appendages on the opisthosoma (the rear body section, the one with no walking legs) the best known being the spinnerets. In the first spiders there were four pairs of spinnerets. Living spiders may have four e.g., (liphistiomorph spiders) or three pairs (e.g., mygalomorph and ecribellate araneomorphs) or three paris of spinnerets and a silk spinning plate called a cribellum (the earliest and many extant araneomorph spiders). Spinnerets' history as appendages is suggested in part by their being projections away from the opisthosoma and the fact that they may retain muscles for movement Much of the success of spiders traces directly to their extensive use of silk and poison.
    [Show full text]