DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Analyses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Analyses SUMMARY OF REGIONAL ANALYSES DELIVERABLES D.T1.2.1 – D.T1.2.4 OFFICE OF THE CARINTHIAN GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT 7 DR. INGO KREYER FEBRUARY 5TH, 2018 1 Table of contents SUBTITLE ......................................................................................................... 0 VERSION 1 ....................................................................................................... 0 MM YYYY ........................................................................................................ 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................. 2 1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ................................................................................. 4 1.1. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................... 4 1.2. METHODS ................................................................................................... 4 1.3. OVERVIEW OF TEST REGIONS ................................................................................ 5 1.4. SUMMARY OF INDICATOR RESULTS ........................................................................... 6 2. GEOGRAPHIC ASPECTS ......................................................................................... 9 2.1. OVERVIEW OF TEST REGIONS ................................................................................ 9 2.1.1. TOTAL AREA .............................................................................................. 9 2.1.2. LAND UTILISATION ........................................................................................ 9 2.2. SAXONY .................................................................................................... 11 2.3. LIBEREC REGION ........................................................................................... 12 2.4. LOWER SILESIA ............................................................................................. 13 2.5. KOROŠKA .................................................................................................. 14 2.6. CARINTHIA ................................................................................................. 15 3. DEMOGRAPHICS .............................................................................................. 17 3.1. OVERVIEW OF TEST REGIONS ............................................................................... 17 3.1.1. TOTAL POPULATION ..................................................................................... 17 3.1.2. POPULATION DEVELOPMENT (GROWTH) .................................................................. 18 3.1.3. POPULATION DEVELOPMENT (ABSOLUTE) ................................................................ 21 3.1.4. DEMOGRAPHIC DEVELOPMENT (AGE) ..................................................................... 23 4. SPATIAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................ 26 4.1. OVERVIEW OF TEST REGIONS ............................................................................... 26 4.2. SAXONY .................................................................................................... 29 4.3. LIBEREC REGION ........................................................................................... 30 4.4. LOWER SILESIA ............................................................................................. 31 4.5. CARINTHIA ................................................................................................. 33 4.6. OTHER REGIONS ........................................................................................... 36 5. CONNECTIONS OVERVIEW ..................................................................................... 37 5.1. OVERVIEW OF TEST REGIONS ............................................................................... 37 5.2. SAXONY .................................................................................................... 37 5.3. LIBEREC REGION ........................................................................................... 38 5.4. CARINTHIA ................................................................................................. 38 6. TOURISM ..................................................................................................... 40 6.1. OVERVIEW OF TEST REGIONS ............................................................................... 40 6.1.1. OVERNIGHT STAYS (HOME COUNTRY VS. FOREIGN COUNTRIES) ........................................... 40 7. COMMUTERS .................................................................................................. 44 7.1. OVERVIEW OF TEST REGIONS ............................................................................... 44 7.2. SAXONY .................................................................................................... 46 7.3. LIBEREC REGION ........................................................................................... 47 2 7.4. KOROŠKA .................................................................................................. 48 7.5. CARINTHIA ................................................................................................. 49 8. FINANCE ..................................................................................................... 51 8.1. OVERVIEW OF TEST REGIONS ............................................................................... 51 9. PASSENGERS ................................................................................................. 53 9.1. OVERVIEW OF TEST REGIONS ............................................................................... 53 9.2. SAXONY .................................................................................................... 53 9.3. LIBEREC REGION ........................................................................................... 56 10. STRATEGIES ................................................................................................. 59 10.1. MUNICIPALITY OF BOLESŁAWIEC .......................................................................... 59 10.2. KOROŠKA ................................................................................................. 59 10.3. CARINTHIA ............................................................................................... 60 11. APPENDIX ................................................................................................... 61 11.1. FURTHER DATA ........................................................................................... 61 11.1.1. DEMOGRAPHICS IN THE MUNICIPALITIES OF KOROŠKA ................................................... 61 11.1.2. DEMOGRAPHICS IN THE MUNICIPALITIES OF CARINTHIA .................................................. 76 11.2. TABLES ................................................................................................... 82 11.3. FIGURES .................................................................................................. 83 3 1. Introduction and summary 1.1. Background This report contains a baseline analysis for the Trans-Borders project. Regional analyses will demonstrate the needs and efforts on cross-border regions and provide the basis for further steps in the project, for identifying best practice examples and for building strategies for border regions. Some of the data in this report can also be used to evaluate the outcome of the project’s concepts and measures. Topics in this report Topics covered in the regional analyses were: geographic aspects, demographics, spatial information, connections overview, tourism, commuters, finance, passengers and strategy. Test regions This report delivers information that can be used to identify the problems and needs of cross-border public transport in the following test areas: 1. Saxony (DE) - Lower Silesia (PL) 2. Liberec region (CZ) - Lower Silesia (PL) 3. Liberec region (CZ) - Saxony (DE) 4. Carinthia (AT) - Koroška (SI) Information is provided for each of the five regions involved: Saxony, Lower Silesia, the Liberec region, Koroška and Carinthia. The report is intended to serve as an additional information base for the project partners, especially the working groups, and for the next project steps: • Transnational Workshop in peripheral regions of Central Europe (best practice) • Stakeholder Workshop for all PP regions • Strategy building process • Best practice review of PT services in border regions 1.2. Methods Project partners completed the templates containing the different criteria. The data was analysed, aggregated and presented in this report by Elfsights GmbH (Langenargen, Germany) on behalf of the Office of the Carinthian Government, Department 7. Support was provided by the Transport Association of Carinthia. Not all data templates were complete for all of the criteria / topics and regions. The descriptive analysis, calculation of further indicators and graphical output were produced by MS Excel. Conclusions were drawn by the analyst, where possible. Interpretation of the results should be carried out by the project partners’ working group members. 4 1.3. Overview of test regions Data from five regions were analysed: Saxony (DE), Lower Silesia (PL), the Liberec region (CZ), Carinthia (AT) and Koroška (SI). Table 1 gives an overview of regions and municipalities. Table 1: Municipalities of the test regions, including total area, permanent settlement area and number of inhabitants Permanent
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 5Th Danube 2015 Eregion Conference
    DeRC 5th Danube 2015 eRegion Conference Cross-border eSolutions & eServices Prototypes Development DeRC 2015 Conference 5th Danube eRegion Conference – DeRC 2015: Cross-border eSolutions & eServices Prototypes Development Ljubljana, Monday-Tuesday, September 21-22, 2015 Location: Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Slovenia, Dimičeva ulica 13, 1000 Ljubljana DeRC 2015 Co-organizers Inter-Municipality Initiative: Cross-border eCollaboration in the Danube eRegion Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Regional Chamber Ljubljana Directorate for Economic Diplomacy, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Slovenia Office for Slovenians Abroad, Republic of Slovenia Host: SAP Videoconference & media partner: Grain of Heath team Tuesday, September 22: Overview Section A (Room A) 09:00 – 10:30 eCommunication as a Tool for Strengthening the Multi-ethnicity and Competitiveness of the Danube Region 11:00 – 12:30 Joint eMunicipalities Without Borders Development 14:00 – 15:30 Chambers of Commerce and Industry for the EU Digital Single Market Development 16:00 – 17:30 Possible Universities’ Contributions to the Digital Single Market Development Section B (Room C) 09:00 : 10:30 Executive Women Expanding Cross-border eBusiness 14:00 – 15:30 EU Based Projects for Public Sector 16:00 – 17:30 Innovation and Business Acceleration Across Borders Section C (Room Oaza, 7th Floor) 11:00 – 12:30 eOpening Up Education & Healthy Workplaces 14:00 – 15:30 Museums eCollaborating on the New eSilk and New eAmber Roads 16:00 – 17:30 Prototype Presentations 2 5th Danube eRegion Conference – DeRC 2015 Monday, September 21, 9:00 – 13:00 Preconference Meeting Regional SAP University Alliance Meeting with Extended Invitation to Rectors & Deans in the Danube Region Room A 9:00 -10:30 Presentations Chair: Adam Dudits, Director University Engagements Baltics, CEE, CIS, Nordics SAP Germany [email protected] Presenters: SAP University Alliance Program – Directions for 2016 Adam Dudits, Director University Engagements Baltics, CEE, CIS, Nordics SAP Germany Experience of Polytechnic Zagreb Mag.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 and Social Work: a Collection of Country Reports
    COVID-19 AND SOCIAL WORK: A COLLECTION OF COUNTRY REPORTS Edited by Lena Dominelli, Timo Harrikari, Joseph Mooney, Vesna Leskošek and Erin Kennedy Tsunoda Contributors are members of the COVID-19 Social Work Research Forum July 2020 ii Disclaimer This compilation of Country Reports of the COVID-19 pandemic provides a snapshot of the situation in particular countries at a moment in time. It has not been peer reviewed, although it was edited several times to clarify the usage of the English language which is not the first language of a number of the authors, and to ensure uniformity of style and referencing. The authors of each Country Report are wholly responsible for the content and accuracy of the data and views expressed therein. Thus, neither IASSW nor the editors, individually or collectively are accountable for their work. The editors and IASSW are simply facilitating access to people’s country narratives. Sharing Information This document should be easy to use and provide comparable information which we trust will be useful for research purposes in social work around the world. The contributors to this first edition of the collection are members of the COVID-19 Social Work Research Forum. However, not all members of the Forum have contributed to it in the short timeframe we had available. We would urge those who would like to contribute their country report to contact Lena Dominelli at [email protected] and she will facilitate access to the contributions already on the IASSW website. Future intention There is an intention to turn this collection into a book at some point in the near future, but we felt it was important to record the positions of various countries now, briefly and quickly.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study Slovenia
    TOWN Small and medium sized towns in their functional territorial context Applied Research 2013/1/23 Case Study Report | Slovenia Version 05/09/2013 ESPON 2013 1 This report presents the interim results of an Applied Research Project conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2013 Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The partnership behind the ESPON Programme consists of the EU Commission and the Member States of the EU27, plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. Each partner is represented in the ESPON Monitoring Committee. This report does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the Monitoring Committee. Information on the ESPON Programme and projects can be found on www.espon.eu The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. This basic report exists only in an electronic version. © ESPON & University of Leuven, 2013. Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON Coordination Unit in Luxembourg. List of authors Nataša Pichler-Milanović, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia Samo Drobne, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia Miha Konjar, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia © Institute UL-FGG d.o.o, Jamova 2, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia ESPON 2013 i Table of contents
    [Show full text]
  • Uchwała Nr XXV/327/20 Z Dnia 26 Listopada 2020 R
    DZIENNIK URZĘDOWY WOJEWÓDZTWA DOLNOŚLĄSKIEGO Wrocław, dnia 14 grudnia 2020 r. Poz. 6963 UCHWAŁA NR XXV/327/20 RADY MIEJSKIEJ GMINY MIRSK z dnia 26 listopada 2020 r. w sprawie wyznaczenie obszaru, wielkości i granic aglomeracji Mirsk Na podstawie art. 87 ust. 1 i 4 ustawy z dnia 20 lipca 2017 r. Prawo wodne (t.j. Dz. U. z 2020 r. poz. 310 ze zm.) w związku z § 3 i 4 Rozporządzenia Ministra Gospodarki Wodnej i Żeglugi Śródlądowej z dnia 27 lipca 2018 r. w sprawie sposobu wyznaczania obszaru i granic aglomeracji (Dz. U. z 2018 r. poz. 1586) Rada Miejska Gminy Mirsk uchwala, co następuje: § 1. Wyznacza się aglomerację Mirsk o równoważnej liczbie mieszkańców wynoszącej 6110 RLM z oczyszczalnią ścieków w Mirsku. § 2. Integralną częścią uchwały jest opis wielkości i obszaru aglomeracji zawierający podstawowe informacje dotyczące charakterystyki aglomeracji, stanowiący załącznik nr 1 do uchwały oraz mapa aglomeracji określająca jej granice i położenie w stosunku do najważniejszych obiektów infrastruktury i obszarów chronionych, stanowiąca załącznik nr 2 do uchwały. § 3. Niniejsza uchwała była poprzedzona rozporządzeniem Wojewody Dolnośląskiego z dnia 20 września 2005 r. w sprawie wyznaczenia aglomeracji: Bielawa, Bolków, Brzeg Dolny, Chełmsko Śląskie, Krośnice, Lubawka, Lubomierz, Lwówek Śląski, Malczyce, Mirsk, Olszyna, Piechowice, Stara Kamienica, Syców, Świerzawa, Wądroże Wielkie, Złotoryja (Dz. Urz. Woj. Doln. Nr 198, poz. 3339 ze zm.), które traci moc z dniem wejścia niniejszej uchwały zgodnie z art. 565 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 20 lipca 2017 r. Prawo wodne (t.j. Dz. U. z 2020 r. poz. 310 ze zm.). § 4. Wykonanie Uchwały powierza się Burmistrzowi Miasta i Gminy Mirsk.
    [Show full text]
  • Stevilka 3 09.Pmd 92 3/16/2009, 8:46 PM Socially Most Developed Urban Centres
    WELL-BEING OF THE MUNICIPALITIES IN SLOVENIA BLAGINJA OBČIN V SLOVENIJI OKE OKE OKE OKE OKE TR TR TR TR TR Jože Rovan, Kaja Malešič, Lea Bregar TI IN S TI IN S TI IN S TI IN S TI IN S ANOS ANOS ANOS ANOS ANOS UDK: 330.59:711(1-2)(497.4) Klasifikacija prispevka po COBISS-u: 1.01 ABSTRACT POVZETEK Well-being is a complex multidimensional concept Blaginja je kompleksen, večrazsežen pojem, ki ga IZ ZN IZ ZN IZ ZN IZ ZN IZ ZN defined as a state of being happy, healthy and opredelimo kot stanje sreče, zdravja in prosperitete. Na prosperous. Generally, well-being is geographically not splošno se blaginja med območji države precej razlikuje. evenly distributed within a country. Major differences Večje regionalne razlike v blaginji zavirajo družbeni in well-being among territorial units at subnational razvoj in lahko povzročajo ekonomske, socialne, level impede the progress of society and may cause urbanistične, okoljske in politične probleme. economic, social, urban, environmental and political Poznavanje regionalnih razlik v blaginji je bistvenega problems. Acknowledging of regional differences in pomena za učinkovito načrtovanje in izvajanje well-being is of key importance for efficient planning regionalnih in prostorskih politik, s pomočjo katerih and implementation of regional and spatial policy želimo doseči skladnejši regionalni razvoj, ki se kaže measures. The principal objective of these policies is v zmanjševanju razlik v gospodarski razvitosti in v balanced regional development proven by diminishing blaginji. Prispevek obravnava merjenje geografskih differences in economic development and well-being. razlik v blaginji v Sloveniji s pomočjo sestavljenih The paper deals with the measurement of geographical kazalcev, temelječih na t.i.
    [Show full text]
  • Portrait of the Regions – Slovenia Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2000 – VIII, 80 Pp
    PORTRAIT OF THE REGIONS 13 17 KS-29-00-779-EN-C PORTRAIT OF THE REGIONS VOLUME 9 SLOVENIA VOLUME 9 SLOVENIA Price (excluding VAT) in Luxembourg: ECU 25,00 ISBN 92-828-9403-7 OFFICE FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES EUROPEAN COMMISSION L-2985 Luxembourg ࢞ eurostat Statistical Office of the European Communities PORTRAIT OF THE REGIONS VOLUME 9 SLOVENIA EUROPEAN COMMISSION ࢞ I eurostat Statistical Office of the European Communities A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2000 ISBN 92-828-9404-5 © European Communities, 2000 Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium II PORTRAIT OF THE REGIONS eurostat Foreword The accession discussions already underway with all ten of the Phare countries of Central and Eastern Europe have further boosted the demand for statistical data concerning them. At the same time, a growing appreciation of regional issues has raised interest in regional differences in each of these countries. This volume of the “Portrait of the Regions” series responds to this need and follows on in a tradition which has seen four volumes devoted to the current Member States, a fifth to Hungary, a sixth volume dedicated to the Czech Republic and Poland, a seventh to the Slovak Republic and the most recent volume covering the Baltic States, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Examining the 12 statistical regions of Slovenia, this ninth volume in the series has an almost identical structure to Volume 8, itself very similar to earlier publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Action Plan Liberec Region
    REGIONAL ACTION PLAN LIBEREC REGION – LOWER SILESIA For improving cross-border passenger rail Final transport Liberec Region - Lower Silesia 11 2018 D.T2.1.2 Page 1 The Trans-Borders project is to make a significant contribution to further development of German-Polish-Czech cooperation in the field of rail passenger transport. In recent years, quantitative, temporal and quality improvement has been noted between Lower Silesia and the Liberec Region, but this process requires continuation as public transport is still not fully competitive with, for example, individual means of transport. Targeted measures within the cross-border project will allow the process that has already started to continue. The development and implementation of a regional action plan aimed at connecting the cross-border region between Lower Silesia and the Liberec Region will contribute to connecting this area with the nearest TEN-T hubs in Wrocław and Praha and will improve not only its communication accessibility but also its attractiveness. The implementation of the regional action plan will support the strategy for sustainable cross-border passenger transport and will correspond to the proposed measures and actions. Page 2 MOTIVATION Linking the peripheral area of Borderland CZ/D/PL to the TEN-T node The neighbouring regions of Lower Silesia and the Liberec Region are located between two corridors of the European railway traffic core network, namely the Orient/East-Med Corridor and the Baltic-Adriatic corridor. For the development of both regions, it is necessary to improve access to the corridors and their respective hubs in Wrocław, Praha and Dresden and between them.
    [Show full text]
  • HT Rozdzial 2 Pressto.Indd
    ISSN 2450-8047 nr 2016/1 (1) http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/ht.2016.1.1.03 s. 19-41 MULTICULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE MEMORY OF LOWER SILESIA. A STUDY OF SELECTED SITES OF MEMORY Violetta JULKOWSKA Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan ABSTRACT Th e topic of text is the problem of Prussian cultural heritage of Lower Silesia, seen from two diff erent perspectives. First, the historical moment of this heritage appearing is introduced and second, the way of its contemporary presence and connected cultiural problems. As a key study were discussed from both perspectives: evangelical church in Karpacz so-called Wang Temple (brought in fi rst half of XIX-th century by Prussian king Wilhelm III from Norway) – nowadays under protection of polish evangelical parish; also: life and charity work of Marianna Orańska – owner of the castle in Kamieniec Ząbkowicki and neighbourhood grounds – nowadays touristic route leading on the borderland of Poland and Czech Republic, following in Marianna’s steps and history of evangelical community from Tyrol, brought to Mysłakowice by Prussian king Wilhelm III – nowadays Tyrol’s House lead by Zierthall commune from Austria. KEYWORDS: sites of memory; cultural identity; heritage; church Wang; Marianna Orańska; evangelical community from Tyrol; Lower Silesia; cultural tourism. 19 THE PRESENCE OF THE PAST HISTORICAL COMPLEXITY OF THE STUDIES INTO THE 19TH-CENTURY HERITAGE OF MEMORY OF LOWER SILESIA Lower Silesia is a region unusually saturated with objects of multicultural herit- age, making it stand out among the historical regions of Central Europe. Th is relatively small area had a turbulent past, while the location at the intersection of major European routes, the fame of natural resources, and good farming conditions att racted several waves of sett lement.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Zbirka / Series OPERA INSTITUTI ARCHAEOLOGICI SLOVENIAE 40 Uredniki zbirke / Editors of the series Jana Horvat, Andrej Pleterski, Anton Velušček Jana Horvat, Irena Lazar, Manjša rimska naselja na slovenskem prostoru Andrej Gaspari (ur. / eds.) Minor Roman settlements in Slovenia Recenzenta / Reviewed by Janez Dular, Ivan Šprajc Prevod / Translation Andreja Maver, Meta Osredkar, Gregor Pobežin, Lucija Jelenko Jezikovni pregled / Language Editors Urška Kosec, Špela Križ, Jana Volk, Terry T. Jackson Tehnična ureditev / Technical Editors Andreja Dolenc Vičič, Mateja Belak Oblikovanje ovitka / Front cover design Tamara Korošec Priprava slikovnega gradiva / Preparation of illustrations Drago Valoh, Mateja Belak Prelom / DTP Mateja Belak Založnik / Publisher Založba ZRC Zanj / Represented by Aleš Pogačnik Izdajatelj / Issued by ZRC SAZU, Inštitut za arheologijo Zanj / Represented by Anton Velušček Tisk / Printed by Present d. o. o., Ljubljana Naklada / Print run 500 izvodov / copies Izid knjige sta podprla / Javna agencija za raziskovalno dejavnost RS (Slovenian Research Agency), Published with the support of Znanstvenoraziskovalni center SAZU (Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts) Ljubljana 2020; prva izdaja, prvi natis / first edition, first print Prva e-izdaja knjige (pdf) je pod pogoji licence Creative Commons 4.0 CC-BY-NC-SA prosto dostopna tudi v elektronski obliki (pdf) / First e-edition of the book (pdf) is freely available in e-form (pdf) under the Creative Commons 4.0 CC-BY-NC-SA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/9789610502586 CIP - Kataložni zapis o publikaciji Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica, Ljubljana 904(497.4-2)«652« MANJŠA rimska naselja na slovenskem prostoru = Minor Roman settlements in Slovenia / uredniki, edited by Jana Horvat, Irena Lazar, Andrej Gaspari ; [prevod Andreja Maver ..
    [Show full text]
  • Tjaša Šilc Idejna Študija Odvajanja in Čiščenja Odpadnih Voda V
    Univerza University v Ljubljani of Ljubljana Fakulteta Faculty of za gradbeništvo Civil and Geodetic in geodezijo Engineering Jamova cesta 2 Jamova cesta 2 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenija SI – 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia http://www3.fgg.uni-lj.si/ http://www3.fgg.uni-lj.si/en/ DRUGG – Digitalni repozitorij UL FGG DRUGG – The Digital Repository http://drugg.fgg.uni-lj.si/ http://drugg.fgg.uni-lj.si/ To je izvirna različica zaključnega dela. This is original version of final thesis. Prosimo, da se pri navajanju sklicujte na When citing, please refer to the publisher's bibliografske podatke, kot je navedeno: bibliographic information as follows: Šilc, T. 2012. Idejna študija odvajanja in Šilc, T. 2012. Idejna študija odvajanja in čiščenja odpadnih voda v naseljih Žlebič, čiščenja odpadnih voda v naseljih Žlebič, Slatnik in Sušje. Diplomska naloga. Slatnik in Sušje. B.Sc. Thesis. Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta University of Ljubljana, Faculty of civil za gradbeništvo in geodezijo. (mentor and geodetic engineering. (supervisor Panjan, J., somentor Krzyk, M.): 98 str. Panjan, J., co-supervisor Krzyk, M.): 98 pp. Univerza Jamova 2 v Ljubljani 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenija telefon (01) 47 68 500 Fakulteta za faks (01) 42 50 681 gradbeništvo in [email protected] geodezijo UNIVERZITETNI ŠTUDIJ za VODARSTVA IN gradbeništvo KOMUNALNEGA in geodezijo INŽENIRSTVA Kandidatka: TJAŠA ŠILC IDEJNA ŠTUDIJA ODVAJANJA IN ČIŠČENJA ODPADNIH VODA V NASELJIH ŽLEBIČ, SLATNIK IN SUŠJE Diplomska naloga št.: 195/VKI CONCEPTUAL STUDY TO DRAINAGE WATER AND TREATMENT OF WASTE WATER FOR THE SETTLEMENT ŽLEBIČ, SLATNIK AND SUŠJE Graduation thesis No.: 195/VKI Mentor: Predsednik komisije: izr. prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Prometno Varnostni Načrt OŠ Mislinja
    2019/20 Prometno varnostni načrt OŠ Mislinja Pripravili: Marija TAŠIČ, Sonja BLAŽUN, Petra CIFER Prometno varnostni načrt OŠ Mislinja KAZALO 1. UVOD ............................................................................................................................................... 3 2. ŠOLSKI OKOLIŠ ................................................................................................................................. 3 3. Otroci v prometu ............................................................................................................................. 3 4. SKICA ŠOLSKIH POTI V OKOLICI ŠOLE .............................................................................................. 4 5. OSREDNJI CILJI IN NAMEN NAČRTA................................................................................................. 4 6. ANALIZA STANJA ŠOLSKIH POTI ....................................................................................................... 5 7. VZGOJNO PREVENTIVNA VSEBINA ZA PRAVILNO IN ODGOVORNO RAVNANJEV CESTNEM PROMETU ................................................................................................................................................ 8 7.1 SKRB ZA PROMETNO VARNOST .................................................................................................. 8 7.2 SKRB ZA PROMETNO VARNOST NA ŠOLI .................................................................................... 9 7.3 PROMETNA VZGOJA V ODDELKIH ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SLOVENE CITIES and SUBURBS in TRANSFORMATION SLOVENSKA MESTA in OBMESTJA V PREOBRAZBI Marjan Ravbar
    SLOVENE CITIES AND SUBURBS IN TRANSFORMATION SLOVENSKA MESTA IN OBMESTJA V PREOBRAZBI Marjan Ravbar Southern part of Ljubljana is spreading on Ljubljana moor (photography Jure Senega~nik). Ju`ni del Ljubljane se {iri tudi na Ljubljansko barje (fotografija Jure Senega~nik). Geografski zbornik 37 Black Cyan Magenta Yellow 65 SYNCOMP Geografski zbornik, XXXVII (1997) Abstract UDC: 911.37(497.12) Slovene Cities and Suburbs in Transformation KEY WORDS: urbanization, suburbanization, cities, suburbs, city regions, settlement regulation In the first part, the article defines urbanization which means the decreasing difference in living stan- dards between the urban and rural populations and the spatial and functional integration of cities with adjacent settlements influenced by economic interaction, the social mobility of the population, and/or communication systems. On the basis of sociogeographic, functional, structural, and phys- iognomic indicators, the article defines in the following sections the extent and principal charac- teristics of the influence of modern urbanization on the countryside and defines the role of suburbs in the Slovene space. The core of the research is devoted to the transformation and the developmental and structural problems of Slovene suburbs. In the conclusion, dilemmas for further development are indicated and some common goals of settlement policy in Slovenia are suggested. Izvle~ek UDK: 911.37(497.12) Slovenska mesta in obmestja v preobrazbi KLJU^NE BESEDE: urbanizacija, suburbanizacija, mesta, obmestja, mestne regije, usmerjanje poselitve. Prispevek (Slovenska) mesta in obmestja v preobrazbi v prvem delu opredeljuje urbanizacijo, ki po- meni zmanj{evanje razlik v `ivljenjski ravni med mestnim in pode`elskim prebivalstvom ter pro- storsko in funkcijsko integracijo mest s sosednjimi naselji pod vplivi ekonomskih interakcij, social- ne mobilnosti prebivalstva in/ali komunikacijskih sistemov.
    [Show full text]