DOCSLIB.ORG

New Advances in Formosan Linguistics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Advances in Formosan Linguistics Asia-Pacific Linguistics Open Access College of Asia and the Pacific The Australian National University New Advances in Formosan Linguistics Elizabeth Zeitoun, Stacy F. Teng and Joy J. Wu (eds.) A-PL 017 / SAL 003 Asia-Pacific Linguistics SAL: Studies on Austronesian Languages EDITORIAL BOARD: I Wayan Arka, Mark Donohue, Bethwyn Evans, Nicholas Evans, Simon Greenhill, Gwendolyn Hyslop, David Nash, Bill Palmer, Andrew Pawley, Malcolm Ross, Paul Sidwell, Jane Simpson. Published by Asia-Pacific Linguistics College of Asia and the Pacific The Australian National University Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Copyright is vested with the author(s) First published: 2015 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: Title: New Advances in Formosan Linguistics / edited by Elizabeth Zeitoun, Stacy F. Teng and Joy J. Wu. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1885/14354 ISBN: 978-1-922185-17-4 (ebook) Series: Asia-Pacific Linguistics 017 / Studies on Austronesian Languages 003 Subjects: Taiwan languages. Austronesian languages. Taiwan languages--Dialects--Phonology. Taiwan languages--Morphosyntax. Other Authors/Contributors: Elizabeth Zeitoun, editor. Stacy Fang-Ching Teng, editor. Joy J. Wu, editor. Australian National University. Asia-Pacific Linguistics. Dewey Number: 499.2 Cover illustration: Taiwan seen from the Pacific (2014), courtesy of Yi-zhen Lin Typeset by Elizabeth Zeitoun, with the help of Kanyu Yeh and Wanda China Contents Foreword v – xix by Elizabeth Zeitoun, Stacy F. Teng and Joy J. Wu Lillian M. Huang: Bibliography xxi – xxiv 1 Malcolm Ross 1 – 38 Some Proto Austronesian coronals reexamined 2 Paul Jen-kuei Li 39 – 46 The preglottalised stops in three Formosan languages 3 Hui-chuan J. Huang 47 – 74 Syllable types in Bunun, Saisiyat, and Atayal 4 Hui-shan Lin 75 – 100 Squliq Atayal reduplication: Bare consonant or full syllable copying? 5 Gujing Lin 101 – 129 Wordhood and event integration in Tsou serial verb constructions 6 Maya Yu-ting Yeh 131 – 155 An atypical SVC? A study of BLAQ UV qu’ NP construction in Atayal 7 Henry Y. Chang 157 – 182 Nominal aspect in Tsou 8 Adlay Kun-long Liu 183 – 210 Outside-in or Inside-out functional uncertainty? An LFG analysis on relativisation in Jianshi Squliq Atayal 9 Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai 211 – 222 Subjecthood and temporal adjuncts in Atayal, Seediq and Tsou ii Contents 10 Naomi Tsukida 223 – 251 Ditransitive alignment and causative constructions in Seediq 11 Dong-yi Lin 253 – 289 The syntactic derivation of interrogative verbs in Amis and Kavalan 12 Li-May Sung 291 – 312 Why exclamatives in Budai Rukai 13 Fuhui Hsieh 313 – 339 The sa construction in Paiwan: A mismatch of syntax and semantics 14 Chia-jung Pan 341 – 362 Reported evidentials in Saaroa, Kanakanavu, and Tsou 15 Marie M. Yeh 363 – 384 Functions of ma’ ’isa:a’ in Saisiyat: A discourse analysis 16 Joy J. Wu 385 – 406 Amis personal pronouns revisited 17 Stacy F. Teng 407 – 429 A comparative study of the personal pronominal systems in three Puyuma dialects 18 Elizabeth Zeitoun 431 – 450 Analogy and grammatical change: A case study of the verb of ‘saying’ in Mantauran Rukai 19 Amy Pei-jung Lee 451 – 483 Body part nomenclature and categorisation in Seediq 20 Apay Ai-yu Tang 485 – 512 Metaphorical expressions of anger and happiness in Truku Seediq and English 21 Yuehchen Chien 513 – 532 The lexical system of Yilan Creole Contents iii 22 Victoria Rau, Yi-Hsin Wu and Meng-Chien Yang 533 – 554 A corpus approach to Yami emotion Editors and Contributors 555 – 558 Foreword* ELIZABETH ZEITOUN, STACY F. TENG AND JOY J. WU 1 Purpose of the present volume The present volume is a festschrift in honour of Lillian M. Huang, who, in a very few years, became a leading figure in Formosan linguistics after she obtained her PhD degree in 1987. Over the past twenty-eight years, she has been involved in important groundwork, in both academia and indigenous language policies in Taiwan, as we will show below (sections 3 and 4). She has been engaged in the development of both through her pre-eminent role in projects relating to typological studies on Formosan languages in the early 1990s, and on language teaching materials and proficiency tests since the late 1990s and early 2000s. Lillian may retire in a few years. Before she does, we thought it would be most appropriate to honour her by putting together papers by a number of scholars and students who have benefitted from or have been in contact with her in one way or another (e.g. through collaborative work, teaching, supervising, advising etc.). The idea of such a volume was conceived by Elizabeth Zeitoun in the autumn of 2009. Further plans were initially worked out with Stacy F. Teng, soon joined by Joy J. Wu. The three editors have been close to Lillian since the early and mid 1990s. Of the three, Zeitoun, who has been working with her on diverse projects for over twenty years, is her closest collaborator on the academic level. Both Wu and Teng were Lillian’s MA supervisees. Through her fieldwork courses, she introduced Wu to Amis and Teng to Puyuma, languages on which they are still working. The title of the present volume, New advances in Formosan linguistics, reflects our pursuit of publishing cutting-edge, provocative, and thoughtful papers that explore new directions and perspectives on Formosan languages and linguistics. It is worth noticing that this is the first collected volume on Formosan languages that has not issued from a workshop or a conference—the papers included in this volume are thus varied in terms of topic coverage—and the first that specifically deals with (and covers nearly all) the Formosan languages, a grouping understood in its broader context, that is, including Yami, a Batanic (Philippine) language spoken on Orchid Island under the political jurisdiction of Taiwan. In what follows, we begin by providing a few chronological notes regarding Lillian (section 2), then outlining her work in the context of the past twenty flourishing years of research on Formosan languages (section 3). In section 4, we provide a bird’s eye view of * The first draft of this foreword was written by Elizabeth Zeitoun, and corrected with the help of Stacy F. Teng and Joy J. Wu. We are grateful to Malcolm Ross and Raleigh Ferrell who kindly polished the present foreword, and to Amy Pei-jung Lee, Hui-chuan Huang and Gujing Lin who provided helpful suggestions on it. v vi Foreword the past twenty years’ revitalisation movement on Formosan languages in Taiwan and explain her social engagement. In section 5, we provide a brief account of the papers included in this volume. Section 6 closes this foreword with our acknowledgments. We need to make it clear here that we will only concentrate on Lillian’s contribution with regard to the field of Formosan linguistics, and are thus led to exclude her contributions in other fields (most notably English teaching). 2 Chronological notes Lillian was born 13 November 1953 at Wanhua, Taipei. She is the sixth child of a large family composed of two brothers and six sisters. She was admitted to the Taipei First Girls High School (the best girls’ high school in Taiwan). Though she was talented in mathematics, she decided to major in English at National Taiwan Normal University. Upon graduation in 1976, she worked as an English teacher for one year in Taipei Municipal Dali High School and then as a teaching assistant at the Department of English, National Taiwan Normal University for another year. She headed for the United States in 1978 and obtained an MA in linguistics at the University of Florida at Gainesville. She was again a teaching assistant at NTNU from 1980 to 1982 and lecturer from 1982 to 1987, but obtained a leave of absence to pursue higher studies. In 1983, she started her PhD studies at the Department of Linguistics at Rice University, Texas under the supervision of Philip W. Davis. She graduated in May 1987 and published her PhD dissertation (Huang 1988) in Taiwan a year later. To date, her dissertation remains an important reference in Chinese linguistics. On her return to Taiwan in the summer of 1987, Lillian continued to work in the Department of English, NTNU as Associate Professor—for a few years, she was also a part-time professor at the Department of Ethnology, National Chengchi University (NCCU)—and became full professor in August 1995. She was chair of the department from August 1996 to July 1999 and the director of the Office of Academic Development (now the Office of Research and Development). She retired from NTNU in 2006 and started a new career the same year at the Department of Applied Foreign Languages, Shih Chien University. She was chair of the department from August 2006 to July 2007. Lillian is one of the founders, and was the first secretary, of the Linguistic Society of Taiwan (10 December 1999-31 January 2002). For three years from 2010 to 2012, she was head of the linguistics section of the National Science Council (now Ministry of Science and Technology). She was also a member of the Language Development Committee, Council of Indigenous Peoples from September 2006 to August 2008, and a member of the Indigenous Peoples Commissions of Taipei City (2007–2009) and New Taipei City (2011–2013). She has been a consultant for the Indigenous Languages Research and Development Centre, Council of Indigenous Peoples since June 2014. For many years, she has also been an advisor to the Ministry of Education. It was Philip W. Davis who advised her to investigate Formosan languages, and on return to Taiwan in 1987, she started her long–life research on Atayal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Edith Aldridge Associate Professor Department of Linguistics University of Washington Box 352425, Seattle, WA 98195 [email protected] http://faculty.washington.edu/aldr/index.shtml Curriculum Vitae Education 2004: PhD in Linguistics, Cornell University Thesis title: Ergativity and Word Order in Austronesian Languages 1992: MA in Linguistics, Sophia University, Japan Thesis title: 『日本語の三人称代名詞の構造的、談話的特性』 [Structural and Discourse Properties of Japanese Third-person Pronouns] 1990: BA in Japanese & Linguistics, Sophia University 1984: AAS in Computer Programming, Kirkwood Community College Employment Fall 2013 to present: Associate Professor, Department of Linguistics Adjunct Associate Professor, Dept. of Asian Languages and Literature University of Washington 04/2014 – 08/2014: Visiting Associate Professor National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics (NINJAL) 09/2013 – 03/2014: Visiting Scholar Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica Fall 2007-Spr 2013: Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics Adjunct Assistant Professor, Dept. of Asian Languages and Literature University of Washington Fall 2005-Spr 2007: Mellon Postdoctoral Fellow Department of Linguistics Northwestern University Fall 2002-Spr 2005: Visiting Assistant Professor Department of Linguistics State University of New York at Stony Brook Feb. 1987-June 1989: Computer Programmer Act Japan Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo 1 Aug. 1984-July 1985: Computer Programmer University of Maryland, Far East Division Yokota US Air Force Base Fussa, Tokyo Publications Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles 2016. Ergativity from subjunctive in Austronesian languages. To appear in: Language and Linguistics 17.1. In press. A Minimalist Approach to the Emergence of Ergativity in Austronesian Languages. Linguistics Vanguard. 2014. Predicate, Subject, and Cleft in Austronesian Languages. Sophia Linguistica 61:97-121. 2013. Object Relative Clauses in Archaic Chinese.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on Linguistic Fieldwork and Language Documentation in Eastern Indonesia
    Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication No. 15 Reflections on Language Documentation 20 Years after Himmelmann 1998 ed. by Bradley McDonnell, Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker & Gary Holton, pp. 256–266 http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldc/ 25 http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24827 Reflections on linguistic fieldwork and language documentation in eastern Indonesia Yusuf Sawaki Center for Endangered Languages Documentation, University of Papua I Wayan Arka Australia National University Udayana University In this paper, we reflect on linguistic fieldwork and language documentation activities in Eastern Indonesia. We first present the rich linguistic and biological diversity of this region, which is of significant interest in typological and theoretical linguistics and language documentation. We then discuss certain central educational issues in relation to human resources, infrastructures, and institutional support, critical for high quality research and documentation. We argue that the issues are multidimensional and complex across all levels, posing sociocultural challenges in capacity-building programs. Finally, we reflect on the significance of the participation oflocal fieldworkers and communities and their contextual training. 1. Introduction In this paper, we reflect on linguistic fieldwork and language documentation in Eastern Indonesia. By “Eastern Indonesia,” we mean the region that stretches from Nusa Tenggara to Papua,1 including Nusa Tenggara Timur, Sulawesi, and Maluku. This region is linguistically one of the most diverse regions in the world interms of the number of unrelated languages and their structural properties, further discussed in the next section. This is the region where Nikolaus Himmelmann has done his linguistic 1The term “Papua” is potentially confusing because it is used in two senses.
    [Show full text]
  • Tonhauser, Judith
    UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics, Theories of Everything Volume 17, Article 7: 43-58, 2012 Nominal Tense in Tsou: Nia and Its Syntax/Semantics* Henry Y. Chang This paper investigates nominal tense (NT) in the Formosan language Tsou. In light of the NT diagnostics proposed in Nordlinger and Sadler (2004), this paper analyzes the nominal temporal marker nia as an instance of Independent NT (INT), heading a DP-internal tense phrase (TP). The INT-analysis explains nicely why (i) nia makes a temporal distinction of past versus nonpast within a noun phrase, (ii) nia cannot be replaced by a verbal tense/mood auxiliary, (iii) the meaning of nia is rather abstract—nia applies widely to nouns of various kinds, including nouns denoting artifacts, location and time, (iv) nia is normally preceded by a case marker, (v) a verb is required to undergo nominalization upon patterning with nia, (vi) nia is compatible both with definite and indefinite noun phrases, (vii) nia can co-occur either with a realis auxiliary or an irrealis auxiliary. These findings may advance our understanding of Tsou nominal structure on the one hand and shed new lights on the universal nominal structure on the other (cf. Cinque 2005, 2011). Keywords: Tsou, nominal temporal marker, independent nominal tense, past versus nonpast, nominal structure. 1 Introduction It is generally held that temporal information is characteristic of verbal categories and normally marked on them. However, recent studies have shown that temporal marking is also possible and productive with nominal categories across many genetically unrelated languages. The major debate in this connection is whether nominal temporal markers are instances of nominal tense (Nordlinger and Sadler 2004, 2008, Tonhauser 2007, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • What Are the Limits of Polysynthesis?
    International Symposium on Polysynthesis in the World's Languages February 20-21, 2014 NINJAL, Tokyo What are the limits of Polysynthesis? Michael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun, and Nicholas Evans Of the various labels for morphological types currently in use by typologists ‘polysynthesis’ has proved to be the most difficult to pin down. For some it just represents an extreme on the dimension of synthesis (one of Sapir’s two major typological axes) while for others it is an independent category or parameter with far- reaching morphosyntactic ramifications. A recent characterization (Evans & Sasse 2002: 3f.) is the following: ‘Essentially, then, a prototypical polysynthetic language is one in which it is possible, in a single word, to use processes of morphological composition to encode information about both the predicate and all its arguments, for all major clause types [....] to a level of specificity, allowing this word to serve alone as a free-standing utterance without reliance on context.’ If the nub of polysynthesis is the packing of a lot of material into single verb forms that would be expressed as independent words in less synthetic languages, what exactly is the nature of and limitations on this ‘material’? The present paper investigates the limits – both upwards and downwards – of what the term is generally understood to cover. Reference Evans, N. & H.-J. Sasse (eds.). (2002). Problems of Polysynthesis. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. 1 2014-01-08 International Symposium on Polysynthesis in the World's Languages February 20-21, 2014 NINJAL, Tokyo Polysynthesis in Ainu Anna Bugaeva (National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics) Ainu is a typical polysynthetic language in the sense that a single complex verb can express what takes a whole sentence in most other languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Compassion & Social Justice
    COMPASSION & SOCIAL JUSTICE Edited by Karma Lekshe Tsomo PUBLISHED BY Sakyadhita Yogyakarta, Indonesia © Copyright 2015 Karma Lekshe Tsomo No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission. No part of this book may be stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means including electronic, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission in writing of the editor. CONTENTS PREFACE ix BUDDHIST WOMEN OF INDONESIA The New Space for Peranakan Chinese Woman in Late Colonial Indonesia: Tjoa Hin Hoaij in the Historiography of Buddhism 1 Yulianti Bhikkhuni Jinakumari and the Early Indonesian Buddhist Nuns 7 Medya Silvita Ibu Parvati: An Indonesian Buddhist Pioneer 13 Heru Suherman Lim Indonesian Women’s Roles in Buddhist Education 17 Bhiksuni Zong Kai Indonesian Women and Buddhist Social Service 22 Dian Pratiwi COMPASSION & INNER TRANSFORMATION The Rearranged Roles of Buddhist Nuns in the Modern Korean Sangha: A Case Study 2 of Practicing Compassion 25 Hyo Seok Sunim Vipassana and Pain: A Case Study of Taiwanese Female Buddhists Who Practice Vipassana 29 Shiou-Ding Shi Buddhist and Living with HIV: Two Life Stories from Taiwan 34 Wei-yi Cheng Teaching Dharma in Prison 43 Robina Courtin iii INDONESIAN BUDDHIST WOMEN IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE Light of the Kilis: Our Javanese Bhikkhuni Foremothers 47 Bhikkhuni Tathaaloka Buddhist Women of Indonesia: Diversity and Social Justice 57 Karma Lekshe Tsomo Establishing the Bhikkhuni Sangha in Indonesia: Obstacles and
    [Show full text]
  • Periphrasis in Ontogeny and Phylogeny
    Periphrasis in Ontogeny and Phylogeny Michael Tsai May 17, 2001 1 Introduction Periphrasis may be defined as “the use of longer, multi-word expressions in place of single words”1 [Haspelmath 2000, p. 654]. The term applies in many linguistic domains, from verb conjugation (with temporal auxiliaries) to comparative forms (with more) to interrogatives (with do). A periphrastic expression is composed of free morphemes, while a monolectic expression consists of a single word that may be composed of several morphemes bound together, e.g. through inflection. This distinction applies not just to expressions, but also to whole languages: so-called analytic (isolating) languages contain mostly monomorphemic words and rely heavily on syntax to express meaning, synthetic (inflectional) languages rely more on morphology, and polysynthetic languages can express whole sentences as a single string of bound morphemes [O’Grady 1997]. However, these terms are rough classifications, and many languages contain both analytic and synthetic elements, sometimes even in the same paradigm. The balance between the two differs with the area of grammar under consideration, but it may also differ within the same area of grammar over time. In this paper we will examine the tension between periphrastic and bound forms with respect to two aspects of grammar: tenses and interrogatives. We will examine these from the perspectives of language creation and language change, drawing on evidence from creoles2 and historical linguistics. Results from language acquisition will link these two disciplines and suggest motivations for the diachronic changes and the patterns that emerge. 1Strictly speaking, the boundary between periphrasis and discourse is ill-defined, for it depends upon what languages exist and what linguists know about them.
    [Show full text]
  • Livret Des Résumés Booklet of Abstracts
    34èmes Journées de Linguistique d’Asie Orientale JLAO34 34th Paris Meeting on East Asian Linguistics 7–9 juillet 2021 / July, 7th–9th 2021 Colloque en ligne / Online Conference LIVRET DES RÉSUMÉS BOOKLET OF ABSTRACTS Comité d’organisation/Organizing committee Raoul BLIN, Ludovica LENA, Xin LI, Lin XIAO [email protected] *** Table des matières / Table of contents *** Van Hiep NGUYEN (Keynote speaker): On the study of grammar in Vietnam Julien ANTUNES: Description et analyse de l’accent des composés de type NOM-GENITIF-NOM en japonais moderne Giorgio Francesco ARCODIA: On ‘structural particles’ in Sinitic languages: typology and diachrony Huba BARTOS: Mandarin Chinese post-nuclear glides under -er suffixation Bianca BASCIANO: Degree achievements in Mandarin Chinese: A comparison between 加 jiā+ADJ and 弄 nòng+ADJ verbs Etienne BAUDEL: Chinese and Sino-Japanese lexical items in the Hachijō language of Japan Françoise BOTTERO: Xu Shen’s graphic analysis revisited Tsan Tsai CHAN: Cartographic fieldwork on sentence-final particles – Three challenges and some ways around them Hanzhu CHEN & Meng CHENG: Corrélation entre l’absence d’article et la divergence lexicale Shunting CHEN, Yiming LIANG & Pascal AMSILI: Chinese Inter-clausal Anaphora in Conditionals: A Linear Regression Study Zhuo CHEN: Differentiating two types of Mandarin unconditionals: Their internal and external syntax Katia CHIRKOVA: Aspect, Evidentiality, and Modality in Shuhi Anastasia DURYMANOVA: Nouns and verbs’ syntactic shift: some evidences against Old Chinese parts-of- speech
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 4-2:2011
    JSEALS Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society Managing Editor: Paul Sidwell (Pacific Linguistics, Canberra) Editorial Advisory Board: Mark Alves (USA) George Bedell (Thailand) Marc Brunelle (Canada) Gerard Diffloth (Cambodia) Marlys Macken (USA) Brian Migliazza (USA) Keralapura Nagaraja (India) Peter Norquest (USA) Amara Prasithrathsint (Thailand) Martha Ratliff (USA) Sophana Srichampa (Thailand) Justin Watkins (UK) JSEALS is the peer-reviewed journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, and is devoted to publishing research on the languages of mainland and insular Southeast Asia. It is an electronic journal, distributed freely by Pacific Linguistics (www.pacling.com) and the JSEALS website (jseals.org). JSEALS was formally established by decision of the SEALS 17 meeting, held at the University of Maryland in September 2007. It supersedes the Conference Proceedings, previously published by Arizona State University and later by Pacific Linguistics. JSEALS welcomes articles that are topical, focused on linguistic (as opposed to cultural or anthropological) issues, and which further the lively debate that characterizes the annual SEALS conferences. Although we expect in practice that most JSEALS articles will have been presented and discussed at the SEALS conference, submission is open to all regardless of their participation in SEALS meetings. Papers are expected to be written in English. Each paper is reviewed by at least two scholars, usually a member of the Advisory Board and one or more independent readers. Reviewers are volunteers, and we are grateful for their assistance in ensuring the quality of this publication. As an additional service we also admit data papers, reports and notes, subject to an internal review process.
    [Show full text]
  • The Heritage Language Acquisition and Education of an Indigenous Group in Taiwan: an Ethnographic Study of Atayals in an Elementary School
    THE HERITAGE LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AND EDUCATION OF AN INDIGENOUS GROUP IN TAIWAN: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY OF ATAYALS IN AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BY HAO CHEN DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Secondary and Continuing Education in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2012 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Mark Dressman, Chair Professor Sarah McCarthey Professor Liora Bresler Assistant Professor Wen-Hao Huang ABSTRACT In this study, I used ethnographic methods to investigate the learning and education of the heritage language of a group of indigenous students in Taiwan. Traditionally, their heritage language, Atayal, was not written. Also, Atayal was taught at schools only recently. As one of Austronesian language families, Atayal language and culture could have been part of the origin of other Polynesians in the Pacific Islands. Furthermore, as an Atayal member I was interested in knowing the current status of Atayal language among the Atayal students in school. I also wanted to know the attitudes of Atayal learning of the participants as well as how they saw the future of Atayal language. Last, I investigated the relationship of Atayal language and Atayal cultures. I stayed in an Atayal village in the mid mountain area in Taiwan for six months to collect observation and interview data. The research site included the Bamboo Garden Elementary School and the Bamboo Garden Village. In the 27 Atayal students who participated in this study, 16 were girls and 11 were boys. They were between Grade 2 to Grade 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Endangered Languages in Taiwan
    The Endangered Languages in Taiwan Paul Li Academia Sinica Abtract All Formosan languages are endangered and threatened with extinction. The problems of the criteria for being endangered languages and what aspects of language to study are briefly discussed. There are five most endangered Formosan languages: Pazih, Thao, Kanakanavu, Saaroa and Kavalan, each with a few speakers left. An account of the work that has been done on each of these languages is given. Finally there is a brief discussion of what has been done to conserve and revitalize all the endangered languages in Taiwan. 1. Languages in Taiwan: The Past and the Present There are two main types of languages spoken in Taiwan, Austronesian and Chinese. All the aboriginal languages, spoken in the plains or mountain areas, belong to the Austronesian language family. The population of the indigenous peoples (450,000) is very small, only barely 2% of the total population of Taiwan (23,000,000). The rest of the population speaks a variety of Chinese dialects, including Mandarin, Minnan (Taiwanese), and Hakka. Mandarin has been adopted as the official language by the Nationalist Government since 1945, and it has become the predominant language at the expense of all the other languages in Taiwan. Hence these languages, especially the aboriginal, are endangered and threatened with extinction. Despite all the efforts of the new government in the past eight years, it seems hard to turn the tide. When I started to work on Rukai, an Austronesian language in Taiwan, in 1970, it was sound and healthy, as were many other Formosan languages, such as Atayal, Seediq, Bunun, Tsou, Paiwan, and Amis.
    [Show full text]
  • Adverbial Verb Constructions in Truku Seediq
    W O R K I N G P A P E R S I N L I N G U I S T I C S The notes and articles in this series are progress reports on work being carried on by students and fac- ulty in the Department. Because these papers are not finished products, readers are asked not to cite from them without noting their preliminary nature. The authors welcome any comments and suggestions that readers might offer. Volume 45(1) April 2014 DEPARTMENT OF LINGUISTICS UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA HONOLULU 96822 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Institution Working Papers in Linguistics: University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Vol. 45(1) DEPARTMENT OF LINGUISTICS FACULTY 2014 Victoria B. Anderson Andrea Berez Derek Bickerton (Emeritus) Robert A. Blust Lyle Campbell Kenneth W. Cook (Adjunct) Kamil Deen (Graduate Chair) Patricia J. Donegan (Chair) Katie K. Drager Emanuel J. Drechsel (Adjunct) Michael L. Forman (Emeritus) Roderick A. Jacobs (Emeritus) William O’Grady Yuko Otsuka Ann Marie Peters (Emeritus) Kenneth L. Rehg Lawrence A. Reid (Emeritus) Amy J. Schafer Albert J. Schütz, (Emeritus, Editor) Jacob Terrell James Woodward Jr. (Adjunct) ii ADVERBIAL VERB CONSTRUCTIONS IN TRUKU SEEDIQ MAYUMI OIWA Formosan languages are known to employ verb-like entities (adverbial verbs) for adverbial expression. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of adverbial verb constructions in Truku Seediq, an Austronesian language of Taiwan, and explores historical and typological implications. I will demonstrate that all Truku adverbial verbs have the ability to occur in two distinct constructions: (i) serial verb constructions in which they behave like stative verbs, and (ii) constructions in which they behave on a par with preverbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Reduplication and Odor in Four Formosan Languages*
    LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS 11.1:99-126, 2010 2010-0-011-001-000300-1 Reduplication and Odor in Four Formosan Languages* Amy Pei-jung Lee National Dong Hwa University This paper is a morpho-semantic study of olfactory terms and linguistic expressions for describing odor in four Formosan languages, including Kavalan, Truku Seediq, Paiwan, and Thao, based on the author’s firsthand data. It shows that apart from very limited olfactory terms, reduplication is the most common means for manifesting the meaning of ‘(having) a smell / an odor of X’ in these languages. The formation usually involves a prefix which is found similar in these languages, in Kavalan as su-, Truku Seediq as s-, Paiwan as sa-, and Thao as tu-. Two parameters are taken into consideration: first, the selective restriction on the relevant lexical items for the reduplicative construction, and secondly, the reduplicative patterns in each language. It is proposed that the reason why odor is manifested by reduplication is due to its association with both iterative aspects and plurality. Having a smell is a continuing process, and it is mentally perceptible so that there should be enough entities in order to produce a persistent smell. Inspired by experimental studies in psychology on odor recognition and identification, which suggest a poverty of linguistic representation for odor perception, this paper discusses similarities and differences regarding how each language indicates such a meaning, as well as the semantic implications drawn from the comparison. Key words: reduplication,
    [Show full text]