Review Of" Chicago Sociology, 1920-1932" by REL Faris

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Review Of Swarthmore College Works History Faculty Works History 12-1-1973 Review Of "Chicago Sociology, 1920-1932" By R. E.L. Faris Robert C. Bannister Swarthmore College Follow this and additional works at: https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-history Part of the History Commons Let us know how access to these works benefits ouy Recommended Citation Robert C. Bannister. (1973). "Review Of "Chicago Sociology, 1920-1932" By R. E.L. Faris". Isis. Volume 64, Issue 224. 570-571. DOI: 10.1086/351211 https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-history/196 This work is brought to you for free by Swarthmore College Libraries' Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Review Author(s): Robert C. Bannister Review by: Robert C. Bannister Source: Isis, Vol. 64, No. 4 (Dec., 1973), pp. 570-571 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of The History of Science Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/229679 Accessed: 11-06-2015 16:03 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press and The History of Science Society are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Isis. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 130.58.65.13 on Thu, 11 Jun 2015 16:03:40 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 570 BOOK REVIEWS-ISIS, 64 * 4 * 224 (1973) without an overall knowledge of the space mated spacecraft was publicized in flights to program, as it was the Soviet practice to keep Mars and Venus and the landing of an eight- the Germans working on isolated projects. wheeled moon rover, Lunakhod-1, in 1970. Correctly, Daniloff sees the contribution of Aware of U.S. progress, in 1968 the Russians German scientists as "mostly complemen- ceased their propaganda statements about tary." reaching the moon first. Although the Germans possessed superior Daniloff views cooperation as essentially technology, Russian theory was equally confined to talks between Kennedy and advanced. By 1947 Stalin and his advisors Khrushchev and their respective representa- were convinced that the development of an tives because of outstanding political and ICBM was possible and could deliver an military disarmament problems. Exchange of atomic warhead, contrary to Vannevar information from agreements on weather Bush's statement on the impracticality of satellites, magnetic field data, and space ICBM development. Daniloff does not see medicine has lagged badly. After the U.S. the Russian decision as anything more than a lunar landing, cooperation on the Skylab response to U.S. capability and a preoccupa- project opens possibilities for joint efforts in tion with defense. Space exploration, satel- the late 1970s in orbital laboratories. lites, and their attendant propaganda value In concluding, Daniloff asserts that the were not seriously discussed. Soviets did participate in the space race, During the final months of the Stalin era especially when Khrushchev was in power, in (1952-1953) the Soviet government began to spite of the fact that the Kremlin never finalize its rocket development plans. Pre- officially made the challenge. The evidence parations for the International Geophysical here is simply that the Russians laid claim to Year led to a decision in 1955 to launch a many "firsts" in the early years of the space satellite, which was forewarned in Soviet age. magazines but generally overlooked by The Kremlin and the Cosmos supplies a Western observers. Pravda spoke of the great deal of data to enable the reader to "American lag" in January 1957. Khrushchev assess the Soviet space program; but as the was not fully aware of the propaganda im- author freely admits, much information re- pact of Sputnik until several weeks after the mains secret, and conclusions drawn are open launch, but his increasing boastfulness to revision in the light of new evidence. seemed like a challenge to the U.S. The space JOHN STUART BELTZ race to the moon, if it ever existed, was never Research Institute officially declared by the Kremlin. "Both Universityof Alabama Kennedy and Khrushchev," Daniloff con- Huntsville, Alabama 35807 cluded, "tried to harness the superpower rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union for the purpose of stimulating Robert E. L. Faris. Chicago Sociology, 1920- their own domestic programs-in the Ameri- 1932. xi + 163 pp., 8 illus., 2 apps., name and can case, space exploration; in the Soviet, subject indices. San Francisco: Chandler economic development. Neither thought it Publishing Company; Scranton, Pa.: Intext/ worthwhile directly to respond to the other's Chandler, 1967. $8. challenge." Daniloff holds that Krushchev, although A brief, clearly organized overview, this cautious about sending a man to the moon, study traces the development of sociology favored a manned expedition, probably by at the University of Chicago during its first earth orbital rendezvous technique, and three decades. Although gaining prominence pressed space scientists toward this goal. with the arrival of Robert Park in 1915, the There were skeptics among the scientists and Chicago School owed much to a fortuitous within high policy councils; Daniloff, al- combination of circumstance and zeal in its though unable to identify them by name, early days: the newness of the university; a presents evidence for their existence. Up to tailor-made social laboratory in Chicago; Krushchev's ouster in 1964 the Soviets were the organizing genius of Albion Small, seriously studying how to achieve a manned chairman of the department from 1892 to landing. After the Premier's removal, manned 1923; and the methodological work of W. I. flight receded into the background and auto- Thomas. The resulting harvest was abundant: This content downloaded from 130.58.65.13 on Thu, 11 Jun 2015 16:03:40 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions BOOK REVIEWS-ISIS, 64 * 4 * 224 (1973) 571 in urban ecology, in social psychology volume on Ralph Linton, co-authored by (Chicago practiced "symbolic interaction- Adelin Linton and the general editor of the ism," Robert B. L. Faris writes, before the series, Charles Wagley, it indicates a format label was known), and in widely ranging for the series as a whole: a text of just under studies of the family, race, immigration, and two hundred pages, roughly divided into an social change. Together these investigations eighty-page essay on the subject and his overturned a "do-gooder" tradition that, in work, followed by selections from the sub- Faris' view, blighted earlier effort. Freeing ject's publications, and concluding with a sociology from moorings in physiology and more or less complete bibliography depend- biology, they also fostered more enlightened ing on whether a complete bibliography is social policy. readily available elsewhere. Both published In preparing this informal history, Faris books self-consciously aim at a general draws on his own memories as an under- audience of presumably undergraduate-level graduate and graduate at Chicago (1924- competence in anthropology, and all of the 1931), on the reminiscences of former authors including those announced for pro- associates, and on past conversations with jected volumes are either personal acquain- his father, the late Ellsworth Faris, who tances of their subjects (usually former headed the department from Small's retire- associates) or they are slightly younger ment until 1939. In supplement, he provides scholars whose expertise was the subject's portraits and brief sketches of leading mem- major area of interest. All have established bers of the department and complete lists of some professional identity as anthropologists. doctoral and masters theses from 1893 to These general observations point to the 1935. Intending a straightforward, "objec- peculiar constraints on the value of Murphy's tive" account, he attempts no refutation of book. In the case of the Linton study there recent criticism of the Chicago School (e.g., had previously existed no biographical or in Milton Gordon's Social Class in American autobiographical studies, no collection of Sociology or Maurice Stein's The Eclipse of Linton's papers, and no complete biblio- Community). Nor does he dwell on the clash graphy. The remarks of Linton's widow, of personalities or on departmental politics, however uneven, are therefore invaluable. persuaded that such have little place in a But in the case of Lowie, there already existed history of social science. Although specialists a published autobiography, Cora Du Bois' may regret these decisions, and the absence of selection of Lowie's papers (although more raw material for a sociology of Murphy duplicated only one of her selec- Chicago sociology, this fairminded compre- tions), and Alan Dundes' complete biblio- hensive account, with its lucid summaries of graphy. Murphy is himself an anthropologist, the chief works of the Chicago sociologists, not a biographer or historian, and he admits provides a balanced general introduction to to having drawn most of his information an important chapter in the history of social from Lowie's own account, even though a science. wealth of information is to be found in the ROBERT C. BANNISTER Lowie papers in the Bancroft Library. Department of History The account, however, is sympathetic, con- Swarthmore College trasting markedly with the hypercritical Swarthmore,Pennsylvania 19081 chapter on Lowie in Marvin Harris' The Rise of Anthropological Theory (1968).
Recommended publications
  • Linton, Ralph
    ANTHROPOLOGY THOUGHT JUNE 2019 Linton, Ralph Ralph Linton (1893–1953), American cultural anthropologist, was one of the major contributors to the reconstruction of anthropology during the second quarter of the twentieth century. Trained in the traditions of the North American “historical school” of anthropology, Lin ton remained loyal throughout his career to the broad interests and general principles established by Franz Boas and other American anthropologists. But with the publication in 1936 of The Study of Man, which was quickly recognized by social scientists all over the world as a pioneering study of human behavior, he embarked on a series of creative and stimulating studies which provided new conceptions of social structure and cultural organization. He related these conceptions in a clear if somewhat simple manner to the biological individual and his personality and utilized them in his analyses of the processes of cultural change. Linton belonged to the “third generation” of American academic anthropologists, succeeding such second-generation students of Putnam and Boas as Wissler, Dixon, Kroeber, Goldenweiser, Lowie, Sapir, and Radin. These academicians, together with a number of outstanding journeymen and masters involved more in field research than in teaching, had created a distinctive variety of anthropology. Like Tylor in England, they had a holistic approach to human studies which is still, thanks in part to Linton, a mark of American anthropology. In the Americas much more than in Europe almost all anthropological study and training had been nurtured by experience in the field and disciplined by the empiricism required by field work on specific problems treating the temporal and spatial dimensions of culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Franz Boas: Who He Was, What He Did, and Why It Matters
    Anderson 1 Dylan Anderson Carol Pannocione GERM-1020 7 February 2020 Franz Boas: Who he was, what he did, and why it matters Franz Boas, to this day, is a figure in anthropology whose importance to the discipline can hardly be rivaled by any other figure. The ways in which his radical school of thought overhauled American anthropology cannot be overstated. Old ways of thinking with regards to race and culture were thrown to the wayside by Boas and his students. His life as well as his works were drenched in controversy and rivalry, partly due to his attack on the academic status quo. 1. Biography When Bendix Feibes Aron Levi was made to take a surname in 1808, he took the surname Boas, after the character from the Book of Ruth (Zumwalt 2). Bendix Boas went on, then, to become a textile merchant in Lubbecke, cementing a position in the community (2). At some point, his descendants moved to Minden (3). This is where Boas’ life began. Franz Uri Boas was born in Minden, a small town in the Westphalia region of Prussia on 9 July 1858 (King 14). His parents – Meier and Sophie Boas – were upper-class and highly educated Jews who ascribed to Haskalah thought (15). Haskalah was a philosophical school of Judaism concerned with the moral and cultural renewal of Judaism, especially the revival of the Hebrew language in daily usage. Although he was an excellent student all throughout school, his teachers bemoaned the fact that he never had any firm interest (King 16). He did especially well in high school in the Anderson 2 classical languages, geography, and arithmetic (16).
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Ruth Landes Papers, 1928-1992
    Guide to the Ruth Landes papers, 1928-1992 John Glenn and Lorain Wang The revision of this finding aid and digitization of portions of the collection were made possible through the financial support of the Ruth Landes Memorial Research Fund. 1992, 2010 National Anthropological Archives Museum Support Center 4210 Silver Hill Road Suitland 20746 [email protected] http://www.anthropology.si.edu/naa/ Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 3 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 8 Biographical Note............................................................................................................. 4 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 7 Bibliography: Books......................................................................................................... 8 Bibliography: Articles and Essays................................................................................... 9 Bibliography: Book Reviews.......................................................................................... 10 Names and Subjects .................................................................................................... 11 Container Listing ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • I Sociology Paper - Iii
    M.A. SEMESTER - I SOCIOLOGY PAPER - III CLASSICAL PERSPECTIVE IN CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY SUBJECT CODE: 73505 © UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI Prof. Suhas Pednekar Vice Chancellor University of Mumbai, Mumbai. Prof. Ravindra D. Kulkarni Prof. Prakash Mahanwar Pro Vice-Chancellor, Director University of Mumbai. IDOL,University of Mumbai, Mumbai. Course Co-ordinator : Pankti Surve Assistant Professor, IDOL, University of Mumbai. Course Writers : Prof. Mariyah Gaur Rizvi College of Arts, Science & Commerce, Mumbai. : Dr. Rajula Nanji Shah Sophia College for Women Mumbai. : Dr. Lakshmi Periyaswamy, Kets Vaze College, Mulund (East), Mumbai April 2021, Print I Published by : Director Institute of Distance and Open Learning , University of Mumbai, Vidyanagari, Mumbai - 400 098. DTP Composed : Varda Offset and Typesetters Andheri (W), Mumbai - 400 053. Pace Computronics ipin Enterprises "Samridhi" Paranjpe 'B' Scheme, Vile Parle (E), Mumbai Printed by :Tantia Jogani Industrial Estate, Unit No. 2, Ground Floor, Sitaram Mill Compound, J.R. Boricha Marg, Mumbai - 400 011 CONTENTS Unit No. Title Page No 1. European Modernity, Colonialism And Anthropology And Its Sub Disciplines ............................................... 01 2. Claims To Holism,The Comparative Method And The Origin Of Field Work, Debates In Classical Anthropology.............................................................11 3. Evolutionist Perspectives, Diffusionism : The Kulturkreis School, British Diffusionism...........................18 4. Historical Particularism, Structural Functionalism.............................................................................31
    [Show full text]
  • Culture and Personality Studies
    Culture and Culture and Personality studies: Introduction ‘Culture and personality’ is the earliest name of the school or thoughts of school. It is important study in psychological anthropology, thus culture and personality studies, also called psychological anthropology. Its beginnings are associated especially with the great American linguist and anthropologist Edward Sapir (1884—1939). Sapir was influenced by German Gestalt psychologists, who had argued that perception could be understood only when the thing perceived was viewed not as an assemblage of separate elements, but as an organized pattern (Gestalt). So when one looks, for example, at a landscape painting, one sees it not as flat planes of colour laid against one another, but as a whole — ‘a landscape’. This example shows us too why a whole may be more than the sum of its parts and have its own essential properties. In this Gestalt view, meaning was a function of organized patterns, and Sapir applied this idea to his analyses of language and of culture and personality. Sapir was suspicious of the contemporary concept of culture, which he described as ‘tidy tables of contents’ attached to particular groups of people. In an influential 1934 essay he argued that ‘the more fully one tries to understand a culture, the more it seems to take on the characteristics of a personality organization’ (1985 [1949]: 594). The study of the development of personality was Sapir’s solution to the problems posed by the way that, in anthropological accounts, culture ‘can be made to assume the appearance of a closed system of behaviour’ (p. 594).
    [Show full text]
  • Cora Du Bois Brief Life of a Formidable Anthropologist: 1903-1991 by Susan C
    VITA Cora Du Bois Brief life of a formidable anthropologist: 1903-1991 by susan c. seymour tudents referred to her as formidable, using the French lived alone with former headhunters, resulted in a comprehensive pronunciation. Friends called her “Ropy”—“Radcliffe’s Only ethnography, The People of Alor (1944), that cemented her reputa- SProfessor.” But Cora Du Bois, in fact, was Harvard’s first ten- tion as a pioneer in psychological anthropology and thrust her into ured female professor in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, thanks government service. Asian specialists knew of her work, and after to a bequest that linked the two institutions long before they offi- Pearl Harbor, Du Bois was swiftly summoned to Washington, D.C. cially merged: a gift to Radcliffe College to hire an eminent woman By now a self-made woman with a commanding personality to scholar to hold the Zemurray Stone Radcliffe professorship at Har- match her keen intellect, she became famous for acerbic cables (as vard. (From 1949 to 1954, for a trial period without tenure, medi- she was later renowned for trenchant remarks on student papers). evalist Helen Maud Cam held the post.) Though her appointment She was equally blunt at the State Department in trying to educate in 1954 was in anthropology at Harvard, Du Bois was expected to government and military officials about the rapid changes under fulfill obligations at Radcliffe, too. way in South and Southeast Asia after the collapse of European As the first woman to inhabit a professorial office in the Peabody colonialism. “The US is now heir to whatever is left of western in- Museum, Du Bois by her very presence produced small cracks in fluence in the area,” she said in a 1949 speech to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tasks of the Ethnologist and the Linguist in Brazil
    INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCE BULLETIN THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THE ANDAMAN ISLANDS I consider it a matter of urgency that the somatological surveys which the Indian anthropologists, Dr. B. G. Guha and Dr. S. S. Sarkar, initiated early in 1948 among the last önge tribes on Rutland Island and the surviving indigenous inhabitants on Little Andaman1 should be continued. There are probably now not as many as 50 representatives of the Önge tribes still surviving on Rutland Island. They and the indigenous inhabitants of the neighbouring islands could certainly furnish much valuable information concerning the racial and cultural characteristics of their stock and thus provide valuable material for a general study of the racial history of India and the surrounding region. I happen to know that the above-mentioned anthropologists had to abandon the field research they had undertaken, merely because they could not obtain the requisite financial resources. Unfortunately, very little material is available on the somatology of the Andaman islanders. It is therefore all the more regrettable that (as I found out privately) the large amount of anthropological material that Baron E. Von Eickstedt collected among these natives in January 1928 was lost in the last world war. Of the few suggestions put forward in this paper, I consider the most'urgent tasks to be somatological research among the original inhabitants of Little Andaman, and a comprehensive investigation of the true pygmies whom I discovered in the Schrader Mountains of New Guinea. THE TASKS OF THE ETHNOLOGIST AND THE LINGUIST IN BRAZIL DARCY RIBEIRO A study of the reactions of Brazilian Indian groups in the face of advancing civilization over the last fifty years, and of their prospects of survival, leads inevitably to the conclusion that tribal languages and cultures are gradually disappearing in modern Brazil.
    [Show full text]
  • Please Scroll Down for Article
    This article was downloaded by: [Australian National University Library] On: 21 July 2009 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 907447645] Publisher Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK The Journal of Pacific History Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713435447 Cultural Divisions and Island Environments since the Time of Dumont d'Urville Paul D'Arcy Online Publication Date: 01 September 2003 To cite this Article D'Arcy, Paul(2003)'Cultural Divisions and Island Environments since the Time of Dumont d'Urville',The Journal of Pacific History,38:2,217 — 235 To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/0022334032000120549 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0022334032000120549 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • A Franz Boas Miscellany
    History of Anthropology Newsletter Volume 28 Issue 1 June 2001 Article 4 1-1-2001 Glimpses of Impending Generational Change: A Franz Boas Miscellany George W. Stocking Jr. Franz Boas Leslie Spier Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/han Part of the Anthropology Commons, and the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons Recommended Citation Stocking, George W. Jr.; Boas, Franz; and Spier, Leslie (2001) "Glimpses of Impending Generational Change: A Franz Boas Miscellany," History of Anthropology Newsletter: Vol. 28 : Iss. 1 , Article 4. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/han/vol28/iss1/4 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/han/vol28/iss1/4 For more information, please contact [email protected]. and about a scholar), journals (especially extinct ones), photographs, material artefacts collected during fieldwork, and so on. It was pointed out that M N Srinivas's original field notes were still extant and needed to be preserved, while, on the disheartening side, we learnt that S C Roy's original papers had disappeared. The idea of a newsletter to sustain the momentum of research on the history of the disciplines was also mooted, and again there was discussion on whether this should be (in whole or part) Internet based. [For a fuller account of the lEG Workshop, see Nandini Sundar, Satish Deshpande and Patricia Uberoi, 'Indian Sociology and Anthropology: Towards a History' in the Economic and Political Weekly, June 10-16, 2000, from which the previous two paragraphs have been taken. Also available on the EPW website (http://www.epw.org.in) in its Archives section] One measure of the depth of interest in disciplinary history witnessed at the lEG Workshop is the number of outcomes it has produced.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Anthropological Ideas
    PERSPECTIVES: AN OPEN INTRODUCTION TO CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY SECOND EDITION Nina Brown, Thomas McIlwraith, Laura Tubelle de González 2020 American Anthropological Association 2300 Clarendon Blvd, Suite 1301 Arlington, VA 22201 ISBN Print: 978-1-931303-67-5 ISBN Digital: 978-1-931303-66-8 http://perspectives.americananthro.org/ This book is a project of the Society for Anthropology in Community Colleges (SACC) http://sacc.americananthro.org/ and our parent organization, the American Anthropological Association (AAA). Please refer to the website for a complete table of contents and more information about the book. Perspectives: An Open Introduction to Cultural Anthropology by Nina Brown, Thomas McIlwraith, Laura Tubelle de González is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted. Under this CC BY-NC 4.0 copyright license you are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. 1313 THE HISTORY OF ANTHROPOLOGICAL IDEAS Laura Nader, The University of California, Berkeley Learning Objectives • Identify the central concepts of cultural anthropology and describe how each of these concepts contributed to the development of the discipline. • Describe the role anthropologists play in examining cultural assumptions and explain how the anthropological perspective differs from both ethnocentrism and American exceptionalism.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Anthropology Publications Issued by the Field Museum of Natural History Pub No. Volume 1 (Complete in Two Numbers) 8 No. 1. Ar
    1 Anthropology Publications Issued by The Field Museum of Natural History Pub No. Volume 1 (Complete in Two Numbers) 8 No. 1. Archaeological Studies Among Ancient Cities of Mexico. Part 1. Monuments of Yucatan. By W.H. Holmes. 1895. 138 pages, 69 illus. 16 No. 2. Archaeological Studies Among the Ancient Cities of Mexico. Part 2. Monuments of Chiapas, Oaxaca, and the Valley of Mexico. By W.H. Holmes. 1897. 200 pages, 120 illus. Volume 2 (Complete in Six Numbers) 21 No. 1. Observations on a Collection of Papuan Crania. By G. A. Dorsey, with Notes on Preservation and Decorative Features. By W.H. Holmes. 1897. 48 pages, 33 illus. 23 No. 2. A Bibliography of the Anthropology of Peru. By G. A. Dorsey. 1898. 154 pages. 28 No. 3. Ruins of Xkichmook, Yucatan. By E. H. Thompson. 1898. 22 pages, 30 illus. 51 No. 4. An Aboriginal Quartzite Quarry in Eastern Wyoming. By G. A. Dorsey. 1900. 13 pages, 12 illus. 56 No. 5. Archaeological Investigations on the Island of La Plata, Ecuador. By G. A. Dorsey. 1901. 36 pages, 73 illus. 85 No. 6. Traditions of the Crows. By S. C. Simms. 1903. 44 pages. Volume 3 (Complete in Four Numbers) 55 No. 1. The Oraibi Soyal Ceremony. By G. A. Dorsey and H. R. Voth. 1901. 63 pages, 37 illus. 61 No. 2. The Oraibi Powamu Ceremony. By H. R. Voth. 1901. 97 pages, 40 illus. 66 No. 3. The Mishongnovi Ceremonies of the Snake and Antelope Fraternities. By G. A. Dorsey and H. R. Voth. 1902.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribes That Endured: Four Brazilian Cases
    TRIBES THAT ENDURED: FOUR BRAZILIAN CASES BY NASSARO ANTONIO DE SOUZA NASSER A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1982 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank many persons who helped not only to make this dissertation possible, but helped also to make pleasant the stay of my family and me in the United States. Among them I must especially men- tion Professor Charles Wagley, under whose guidance I have had the pleasure to pursue graduate training. He has not only been a fine and patient advisor, he has also been a warm friend to whom I could ever turn in search of intellectual and personal assistance. Professor Wagley belongs to that rare breed of individuals who combine quality scholarship with humanism. He and his wife, Dona Cecilia Roxo Wagley, have provided much support to my family and me by their friendship. To them I tender my very warmest thanks. The other members of my committee, Drs. Paul Magnarella, Maxine Margo! is, Anthony 01 iver- Smith, and Charles Wood, were patient and extremely helpful. Their comments and suggestions for revision of the early draft of this dissertation were decisive for its improvement. I thank them all for their guidance, their suggestions, and their friendship. I alone am to blame for any shortcomings. Many other colleagues and friends have helped my family and me in sundry ways during our long stay in the United States. To Dr. Terry McCoy, Jane and Michael Painter, Tracy and Don Fairbains, Elisa and Samuel Sa, James Jones, John Wilson, Gilberto Velho, and Newton Monteiro I am most grateful; their assistance was considerable.
    [Show full text]