<<

□ CASE REPORT □

Attainment of a Long-term Favorable Outcome by Treatment for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor and Renal Cell Associated with von Hippel-Lindau Disease

Akihiro Kobayashi 1, Masanobu Takahashi 1,2,HirooImai1,2, Shoko Akiyama 2, Shunsuke Sugiyama 1,2, Keigo Komine 1,2, Ken Saijo 1,2, Masahiro Takahashi 1,2, Shin Takahashi 1,2, Hidekazu Shirota 1,2,NaomiSato3, Fumiyoshi Fujishima 3, Taro Shuin 4, Hideki Shimodaira 1,2 and Chikashi Ishioka 1,2

Abstract

von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease, caused by germline mutations in the VHL gene, is a hereditary autosomal-dominant disorder which predisposes the individual to various malignant and benign tumors. VHL acts as a tumor suppressor, mainly through the negative regulation of hypoxia-inducible factors. Molecular- targeted drugs against vascular endothelial growth factor-signaling pathways, a target of hypoxia-inducible factors, have recently been introduced into clinical practice for the treatment of patients with sporadic and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. However, whether such treatments are effective in pa- tients with VHL disease remains to be elucidated. We herein report a Japanese patient with VHL disease who was successfully treated with sunitinib for approximately 5 years.

Key words: sunitinib, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, renal cell carcinoma, von Hippel-Lindau disease

(Intern Med 55: 629-634, 2016) (DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.55.5796)

an increased intracellular level of HIFs and the activation of Introduction their downstream pathways including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-, platelet-derived growth factor von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is a hereditary (PDGF)-, and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β-related autosomal-dominant tumor syndrome characterized by the pathways (3). Moreover, somatic mutations or promoter occurrence of multiple malignant and benign tumors of vari- methylation in the VHL gene, along with the loss of het- ous organs, including retinal hemangioma, hemangioblas- erozygosity in the VHL locus, are observed in more than toma of the central , pancreatic neuroendo- 90% of patients with sporadic clear cell renal cell carcinoma crine tumor or , , and clear (RCC), according to a recent comprehensive molecular cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (1, 2). VHL disease is analysis (4). Thus, loss-of-function alterations in VHL con- caused by germline mutations in the VHL gene, which is lo- tribute to the process of carcinogenesis of VHL disease, as cated on chromosome 3p25-26. The VHL protein exerts well as most sporadic cases of clear cell RCC. tumor-suppressive functions, mainly by directly regulating For recurrent or unresectable RCC, therapeutic outcomes hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) such as HIF-1α and HIF- obtained through classical cytokine therapies, such as 2α through ubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation (3). -α and interleukin-2 therapies, have been limited. Mutated VHL loses its ubiquitin ligase activity, resulting in Recently, based on the causative role of activation of the

1Department of Clinical Oncology, Institute of Development, Aging and , Tohoku University, Japan, 2Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Japan, 3Department of Pathology, Tohoku University Hospital, Japan and 4Department of Urology, Kochi Medical School, Japan Received for publication May 19, 2015; Accepted for publication June 25, 2015 Correspondence to Dr. Chikashi Ishioka, [email protected]

629 Intern Med 55: 629-634, 2016 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.55.5796

A B

Figure 1. Pathological examinations reveal the presence of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (A) and liver (B). Each left lower panel represents immunohistochemical staining for synapto- physin. , along with and CD56 (data not shown), were positively stained in both the pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and liver metastasis.

VEGF pathway in the pathogenesis of RCC, molecular- present condition and his family history, as mentioned be- targeted therapies against components of the VEGF pathway low, he was diagnosed with VHL disease. The research pro- have been developed for the treatment of sporadic RCC. Ty- ject was approved by the Ethical Committee of Tohoku Uni- rosine kinase inhibitors that target VEGFRs, such as axit- versity Graduate School of Medicine, and we obtained in- inib (5), sorafenib (6), sunitinib (7), and pazopanib (8); formed consent from the patient to perform a direct se- mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, such as quencing analysis for the VHL gene in the patient’s germ- and temsirolimus; and a monoclonal anti-VEGF line DNA, obtained from his peripheral leucocytes. The ge- antibody, bevacizumab (9), are currently available in the netic analysis detected a germline missense mutation in the USA for treating patients with sporadic RCC. Moreover, VHL gene (c. 233 A>G; p.N78S). Because codon 78 is lo- sunitinib and an mTOR inhibitor, everolimus, have been in- cated within the HIFα-binding domain, and this is one of corporated into clinical use for patients with pancreatic the recurrently reported mutations in patients with VHL dis- neuroendocrine tumors (10, 11). However, due to the rarity ease (12), this mutation was considered to be a pathogenic of VHL disease, there are few large and prospective studies mutation, further corroborating the diagnosis of VHL dis- analyzing the efficacies of drug therapies in patients with ease. Tumors of the spinal cord in C1 and C2 were surgi- VHL disease. Thus, it remains to be clarified whether treat- cally resected and pathological examinations revealed that ments with such targeted therapies against the VEGF signal- the tumors were hemangioblastomas. Three months later, tu- ing pathway are similarly effective for patients with VHL mors of the pancreatic body and tail were also surgically re- disease-associated tumors. sected. The pathological findings revealed a neuroendocrine We herein report the case of a Japanese patient with VHL tumor of the (mitotic count: 1/10 high-power field, disease who was successfully treated with sunitinib for ap- Ki67 index: 12%, G2, according to the WHO 2010 classifi- proximately 5 years. cation (13), Fig. 1A). After a 10-month follow-up, multiple liver tumors (3.5 mm in S2, 4 mm in S3, 28 mm and 18 Case Report mminS4,12mmand6mminS6,and21mmand18mm in S6-7) were subsequently resected because of their in- A 19-year-old man experienced abnormal vision in his creased size, and the pathological examination revealed me- right eye and consulted an ophthalmologist. Consequently, tastasis of the pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors to the liver he was found to have retinal angiomatosis of his right eye. (mitotic count: 1/10 high-power field, Ki67 index: 20%, G2, At 23 years of age, he experienced abnormal vision in his according to the WHO 2010 classification, Fig. 1B). Radiof- left eye and presented to the Department of Ophthalmology requency ablation was added to the two residual liver metas- in our hospital. He repeatedly received retinal cryopexy for tases in S2 and S3. Due to the presence of the other two tu- both eyes between 23 and 24 years of age. When he was 24 mors in S7, temozolomide (200 mg/body, day 1-5, q4w) years of age, he suffered paralysis of the upper and lower was administered for three cycles, however, this treatment limbs on his right side. At 25 years of age, he was again re- unfortunately resulted in further progression of the tumors. ferred to our hospital due to deteriorating paralysis, and a Thereafter, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using 40 computed tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance mg of epirubicin and 10 mL of lipiodol, an ethyl ester of io- imaging detected tumors in a number of organs, including dinated poppy-seed oil fatty acid, was performed. Neverthe- the spinal cord, kidney, pancreas, and liver. According to his less, the S7 metastases further enlarged and new liver metas-

630 Intern Med 55: 629-634, 2016 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.55.5796 A

B

C

Figure 2. CT imaging of the liver tumors and a renal tumor (A) before and (B) 9 and (C) 57 months after beginning sunitinib treatment. The two left panels show multiple liver tumors and the right panel shows a renal tumor. The target lesions that were used for the response evaluation are indicated by yellow arrows.

tases occurred (Fig. 2A). The patient was then referred to in Japan when the patient began receiving sunitinib treat- the Department of Medical Oncology in our hospital to re- ment. Three months later, the sum of the diameter of the ceive systemic drug therapy. two liver tumors decreased from 67.9 (42.4+25.5) mm to As shown in Fig. 3, his mother had pancreatic and renal 52.1 (35.0+17.1) mm, a 23% reduction. The size of the re- at 37 years of age and retinal angiomatosis at 47 years nal tumor changed from 17.3 mm to 12.0 mm, a 31% re- of age. His maternal grandmother lost her eyesight and died duction. According to the response evaluation criteria in from renal cancer and brain tumors at 58 years of age. Ac- solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 (14), the response evalu- cording to his family history, the patient was considered to ation of the liver and renal tumors were stable disease (SD) carry type I VHL disease (3). and partial response (PR), respectively. Nine months after As a first-line therapy, the patient started taking sorafenib beginning the sunitinib treatment, the liver tumor size re- 800 mg/day orally. Ten days after beginning the treatment, duced to 43.0 mm with a 37% reduction, considered to be his treatment was stopped because of the side effect of a PR (Fig. 2B). The liver and kidney tumors had continuously grade 3 erythema multiforme rash. As a second-line therapy, reduced in sized compared with the baseline size of the tu- he successfully continued taking sunitinib 50 mg/day orally mors following sunitinib treatment, although the liver tu- (day 1-28, every 6 weeks), with grade 2 toxicities such as mors were slightly increasing. Forty-three months after be- hand-foot syndrome, and stomatitis. For the treat- ginning the sunitinib treatment, several cerebellar metastatic ment of this patient, we selected this dose, which is the lesions occurred with concurrent symptoms of headache. standard regimen for RCC, because the patient had both The main tumor of the cerebellum (25 mm of heman- RCC and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and because gioblastoma) was resected, and gamma (to- sunitinib at a 37.5 mg/day schedule had not yet been ap- tal 20 Gy, 4 Gy ×5) was additionally performed against the proved for treatments of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors other three small residual metastases (up to 5 mm). Fifty-

631 Intern Med 55: 629-634, 2016 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.55.5796

90 81 85 58 30s Lost sight of her eye 81 Gastrointestinal disease 58 Renal cancer and brain tumor

54 49 37 Pancreatic and renal cysts 47 Retinal angiomatosis

27 27 23

19 Retinal angiomatosis (of the right eye) 2 23 Retinal angiomatosis (of the left eye) 25 Hemangioblastoma of the spinal cord, Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, and Renal tumor

Figure 3. Patient pedigree. The number below the squares (men) or circles (women) represents the age of onset, and the number above the squares or circles represents the present age or age at death. A diagonal line represents a death. Arrow indicates the proband. seven months after beginning the sunitinib treatment, the introduced into clinical use for the treatment of patients with treatment was stopped because of the increased size of the RCC. Sunitinib, an oral multi-kinase inhibitor that targets liver tumors (80.7 mm with a 19% increase compared with VEGFR, platelet-derived growth factor receptors (PDGFR), the baseline size of the tumors before beginning the sunit- KIT, and FLT3 (16), is currently used for the treatment of inib treatment, Fig. 2C). However, the kidney tumors had recurrent or unresectable RCC, as well as other VEGFR- retained PR. In total, the patient successfully received sunit- targeted drugs including axitinib, sorafenib, and pazopanib, inib treatment for approximately 5 years, with maintenance and an anti-VEGF antibody, bevacizumab. Inhibitors against of PR and SD for the liver tumors and PR for the renal tu- mTOR, everolimus and temsirolimus (17), have also become mors. therapeutic options in the treatment of RCC. Similarly, For a third-line therapy, we had two options: axitinib, an- sunitinib and everolimus are currently available as treat- other tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR-1, VEGFR- ments for patients with sporadic pancreatic neuroendocrine 2, and VEGFR-3, and everolimus (15), an mTOR inhibitor. tumors (10, 11). In the present case, the patient was able to We chose axitinib treatment due to the following reasons. continuously receive multiple molecular-targeted drug thera- First, we speculated that axitinib, whose targets overlapped peutics involving sorafenib, sunitinib, axitinib, and ever- those of sunitinib, might also be effective in both RCC and olimus. In our patient, treatment with sunitinib conferred pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in this patient that had long-term efficacy without severe side effects, whereas long been sensitive to sunitinib treatment. Second, a phase sorafenib and everolimus showed severe toxicities resulting III trial showed that axitinib exerts better efficacy as a in the discontinuation of the therapies, and axitinib, used af- second-line treatment than sorafenib for patients with RCC, ter sunitinib, demonstrated no efficacy. including those who have previously received sunitinib treat- Several recent data from pilot or small retrospective stud- ment (5), establishing axitinib efficacy as a second-line ies have suggested the promising efficacy of sunitinib for treatment even after sunitinib failure. However, one month patients with VHL disease. A phase II trial by Jonasch et al. after beginning axitinib treatment, it was stopped because of showed that among 15 patients with VHL disease who were the progression of liver metastases. One week after treat- treated with sunitinib, including a total of 20 RCCs and 20 ment with everolimus was initiated as a fourth-line therapy, hemangioblastomas, PR was obtained in 33% of RCC and the patient complained of dyspnea and was diagnosed as in 0% of hemangioblastoma, and disease control (PR + SD) having severe respiratory failure. He was subsequently diag- was observed in 90% of RCC and in 91% of hemangioblas- nosed as having pneumocystis with a marked toma cases (18). Kim et al. reported that all four patients elevationofKL-6andβ-D-glucan in his blood. Despite in- with VHL disease-associated metastatic RCC treated with tensive treatment with corticosteroids and antibiotic agents, sunitinib exhibited PR with a treatment duration of 19-51 he died from pneumocystis pneumonia, 27 days after the months (19). More recently, Roma et al. have shown in their suspension of everolimus treatment. retrospective analysis that 9 of 14 (64%) patients with recur- rent or advanced RCC who received sunitinib treatment as a Discussion first-line therapy achieved PR, with a 2-year PFS of 71% (20). These studies, despite a relatively small number In recent years, new molecular-targeted drugs have been of patients analyzed, suggest that sunitinib treatment is even

632 Intern Med 55: 629-634, 2016 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.55.5796 more effective in patients with VHL disease compared to Byer, Pfeizer, Mochida, Asahi Kasei, Bristol-Myers Squibb, those with sporadic RCC or pancreatic neuroendocrine tu- Daiichi-Sankyo, Merk Serono and Novartis; Research funding, mor. The results from a phase III trial showed PR of 31% Chugai, Taiho, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Merk Se- and progression-free survival (PFS) of 11 months in patients rono, Yakult, Ono and Novartis. with sporadic RCC (7, 21). Moreover, another international phase III trial for sporadic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors References demonstrated a relatively lower efficacy of sunitinib, PR of 9% and PFS of 11 months (10), whereas a phase II trial for 1. Gossage L, Eisen T. Alterations in VHL as potential biomarkers in sporadic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors conducted in Ja- renal-cell carcinoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 7: 277-288, 2010. pan reported a relatively favorable efficacy of sunitinib, PR 2. Shuin T, Yamasaki I, Tamura K, Okuda H, Furihata M, Ashida S. Von Hippel-Lindau disease: molecular pathological basis, clinical of 50%, despite the small number of patients available for criteria, genetic testing, clinical features of tumors and treatment. the analysis (n = 12) (22). The favorable outcome of our pa- Jpn J Clin Oncol 36: 337-343, 2006. tient with PR maintenance from sunitinib therapy for nearly 3. Gossage L, Eisen T, Maher ER. VHL, the story of a tumour sup- 5 years against RCC and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor is pressor gene. Nat Rev Cancer 15: 55-64, 2015. in agreement with the results from these earlier re- 4. Sato Y, Yoshizato T, Shiraishi Y, et al. Integrated molecular analy- sis of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Nat Genet 45: 860-867, ports (18-20, 22) and suggests that sunitinib treatment is 2013. also effective in Japanese populations with VHL disease. 5. Rini BI, Escudier B, Tomczak P, et al. Comparative effectiveness Further prospective studies are required to elucidate whether of axitinib versus sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma patients with VHL disease have a better outcome from (AXIS): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet 378: 1931-1939, 2011. sunitinib treatment than patients with sporadic RCC or pan- 6. Escudier B, Eisen T, Stadler WM, et al. Sorafenib for treatment of renal cell carcinoma: Final efficacy and safety results of the phase creatic neuroendocrine tumors. III treatment approaches in renal cancer global evaluation trial. J In addition, it should be noted that clinicians must pay Clin Oncol 27: 3312-3318, 2009. careful attention to relatively rare, but severe toxicities 7. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P, et al. Sunitinib versus inter- caused by treatment with molecular-targeted drugs, includ- feron alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356: ing everolimus. Our patient died from pneumocystis pneu- 115-124, 2007. 8. Sternberg CN, Davis ID, Mardiak J, et al. Pazopanib in locally ad- monia resulting from everolimus treatment for only one vanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a randomized week, despite the sufficient subsequent treatments of pneu- phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 28: 1061-1068, 2010. mocystis pneumonia. In general, VHL-associated pancreatic 9. Escudier B, Pluzanska A, Koralewski P, et al. Bevacizumab plus neuroendocrine tumors infrequently have metastatic lesions interferon alfa-2a for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: (8-13%) (23, 24), and RCC and hemangioblastoma of the a randomised, double-blind phase III trial. Lancet 370: 2103-2111, 2007. central nervous system are the major causes of death in pa- 10. Raymond E, Dahan L, Raoul JL, et al. Sunitinib malate for the tients with VHL disease (24). Accordingly, the application treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med of therapy using molecular-targeted drugs, which is used to 364: 501-513, 2011. prolong the survival but not to cure the disease, should be 11. Yao JC, Shah MH, Ito T, et al. Everolimus for advanced pancre- carefully considered in each patient with VHL-associated atic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med 364: 514-523, 2011. pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. However, in our patient, 12. Nordstrom-O’Brien M, van der Luijt RB, van Rooijen E, et al. Genetic analysis of von Hippel-Lindau disease. Hum Mutat 31: liver metastases of the pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor 521-537, 2010. were markedly progressing and thought to become lethal le- 13. Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban R, Theise N. WHO Classification sions within a few months. Therefore, we consider that our of Tumours of the Digestive System. 4th ed. International Agency decision to use drug treatments including everolimus in this for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, 2010. patient was appropriate. 14. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evalu- ation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version In conclusion, we described a Japanese patient with VHL- 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45: 228-247, 2009. associated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and liver metas- 15. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Oudard S, et al. Efficacy of everolimus in tasis, as well as RCC and hemangioblastoma of the central advanced renal cell carcinoma: a double-blind, randomised, nervous system, who was successfully treated with sunitinib placebo-controlled phase III trial. Lancet 372: 449-456, 2008. for 57 months with PR exemplifying the best therapeutic re- 16. Faivre S, Demetri G, Sargent W, Raymond E. Molecular basis for sunitinib efficacy and future clinical development. Nat Rev Drug sponse. Our experience supports the concept that patients Discov 6: 734-745, 2007. with VHL disease may benefit more from VEGFR-targeting 17. Hudes G, Carducci M, Tomczak P, et al. Temsirolimus, interferon drugs than those with sporadic pancreatic neuroendocrine tu- alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med mor and/or RCC. However, larger prospective clinical trials 356: 2271-2281, 2007. are warranted to determine the efficacy of VEGF-pathway- 18. Jonasch E, McCutcheon IE, Waguespack SG, et al. Pilot trial of sunitinib therapy in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease. Ann targeting drugs or mTOR inhibitors in the treatment of pa- Oncol 22: 2661-2666, 2011. tients with VHL disease. 19. Kim HC, Lee JS, Kim SH, So HS, Woo CY, Lee JL. Sunitinib treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in patients with von Author’s disclosure of potential Conflicts of Interest (COI). hippel-lindau disease. Cancer Res Treat 45: 349-353, 2013. Chikashi Ishioka: Research funding, Taiho, Chugai, Takeda, 20. Roma A, Maruzzo M, Basso U, et al. First-Line sunitinib in pa-

633 Intern Med 55: 629-634, 2016 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.55.5796

tients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in von Hippel-Lindau differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Invest New Drugs (VHL) disease: clinical outcome and patterns of radiological re- 31: 1265-1274, 2013. sponse. Fam Cancer 14: 309-316, 2015. 23. Charlesworth M, Verbeke CS, Falk GA, Walsh M, Smith AM, 21. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P, et al. Overall survival and up- Morris-Stiff G. Pancreatic lesions in von Hippel-Lindau disease? dated results for sunitinib compared with interferon alfa in pa- A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the literature. J Gastro- tients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 27: 3584- intest Surg 16: 1422-1428, 2012. 3590, 2009. 24. Igarashi H, Ito T, Nishimori I, et al. Pancreatic involvement in 22. Ito T, Okusaka T, Nishida T, et al. Phase II study of sunitinib in Japanese patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease: results of a na- Japanese patients with unresectable or metastatic, well- tionwide survey. J Gastroenterol 49: 511-516, 2014.

Ⓒ 2016 The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine http://www.naika.or.jp/imonline/index.html

634