IEEE488: Not Dead Yet?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IEEE488: Not Dead Yet? designfeature By Dan Strassberg, Senior Technical Editor NOTHING GOOD LASTS FOREVER, BUT IEEE 488’S SLOW DECLINE IS MAKING THE VENERABLE INSTRUMENT-INTERFACE STANDARD SEEM IMMORTAL. ike the character in the famous Monty Python sketch, IEEE 488 is Lnot dead yet. The decades-old stan- dard’s longevity is in question, however, and you probably have good reason to care about its fight for life.Whether you design test-and-measurement instru- ments, develop or implement systems that incorporate test-and-measurement products that others design, or simply use such products in your lab or test fa- cility, the methods that instruments use to communicate with each other and with host computers matter a lot. The communications medium’s physical im- plementation, protocol, and instru- ment-specific command sets strongly influence instruments’ and systems’ speed and cost and the time EEs must spend programming and debugging test applications. In 1977, the IEEE adopted the bus structure and communication protocol that it named IEEE 488. Some others call it GPIB (general-purpose instrumenta- tion bus). The bus’s original name was HPIB (Hewlett-Packard instrumenta- tion bus). HP, which, in 1999, spun off its electronic test-and-measurement business as Agilent Technologies, was the largest manufacturer of such equip- ment, a market position that Agilent still IEEE 488: enjoys. Even before the early 1980s ush- ered in the widespread availability of PCs, large numbers of minicomputers (remember them?) were in use control- ling instruments and processing the data they generated. Until the advent of the HPIB, no stan- not dardized methods existed for interfacing instruments with computers. It’s only a slight exaggeration to say that no two in- struments interfaced in the same way. The RS-232 serial-communication standard and the Centronics parallel- printer interface did a decent job of dead standardizing the computer side of the interface and even motivated some stan- dardization on the instrument side. (RS- 232 ports became popular on slower in- struments.) Still, because it was rugged yet?and relatively speedy, was designed for www.edn.com June 12, 2003 | edn 49 designfeature instrument interfacing, and was backed by several of Agilent’s latest instruments ATAGLANCE HP’s clout, IEEE 488 remained for more support USB 2.0 and, because USB 2.0 is than two decades the industry’s primary ୴ Most test-and-measurement-industry backward-compatible, they support USB standard for enabling instruments and observers believe that IEEE 488’s days are 1.1 as well. Another external serial bus, computers to talk with one another. numbered, but that the number will be well FireWire, also known as IEEE 1394, no Even so, IEEE 488’s early era was no in excess of 3000 days. longer appears to figure significantly in bed of roses. Although the standard did the future of instrument interfacing, even a good job of defining the communica- ୴ The two top contenders for the instru- though it is technically superior to USB, tions hardware, it initially gave short ment-interfacing standard of the future are including USB 2.0. The reasons are pri- shrift to interfacing’s software aspects. Ethernet and USB. You can find one or both marily political. More than a decade elapsed before the in many instruments. Thanks to a more efficient protocol evolution of the necessary software stan- and in spite of a raw bit rate 20% lower dards, particularly SCPI (standard com- ୴ The industry is hard at work to ensure than USB 2.0’s, FireWire—even in its ini- mands for programmable instruments). that the switch to new communication pro- tial implementation—is faster than USB It took still longer to develop standard in- tocols will be nearly painless. Existing instru- 2.0. Subsequent versions of FireWire will strument drivers, whose existence re- ment-control routines should work without be still faster. Moreover, unlike the host- lieved test-system designers of a great deal modification with the computer-standard centric USB, FireWire, with its peer-to- of application-specific programming. protocols. peer topology, seems tailor-made for test- and-measurement systems that include SEEMINGLY TORPID PACE ୴ Don’t be fooled by the new protocols’ both a host computer and instruments The idea that the electronics industry high nominal bit rates; instrument interfac- such as modern oscilloscopes and logic includes a segment that marks its evolu- ing usually involves short messages. In such analyzers, which contain their own com- tion in decades rather than months must service, IEEE 488 can be significantly faster puters. (By enabling several computers to seem bizarre—even unthinkable—to than protocols that at first appear to be share control of the bus, the new OTG younger EEs whose experience stretches much faster than IEEE 488. (On The Go) extension of USB 2.0 back only as far as the go-go days of the should at least partially overcome late 1990s. However, this seemingly tor- FireWire’s advantages in applications pid pace is keeping IEEE 488 alive, even necessary. Scopes that offer communica- that embody multiple computers that if not in the most robust health, and will tion ports other than IEEE 488 are be- can act as hosts.) But, whereas manufac- continue to do so for years to come. coming increasingly common. The result turers need not pay royalties to use USB To many observers, though, propelled of the need to intermix old and new in- in their products, using the patented by ubiquitous computer-interconnect struments will be increasing numbers of FireWire technology requires royalty standards, IEEE 488 appears to have en- instrumentation setups that also intermix payments. The royalty situation togeth- tered the end game. It may not go quiet- communication protocols (Figure 1). er with the influence of a few large com- ly—powerful forces will keep it alive for The current and most likely future panies that back it has enabled USB to years, but many in the industry see its leader in replacing IEEE 488 is Ethernet. leap ahead of FireWire in test-and-meas- demise as inevitable.A decade from now, USB will also play a major role; indeed, urement applications. on test floors and maybe even in some REMOTE REMOTE LOCAL design labs, you’ll still see instruments UNIX-BASED CONTROLLER WINDOWS-BASED CONTROLLER WINDOWS-BASED CONTROLLER with IEEE 488 connectors and cables, but USER USER USER you’ll probably have to look APPLICATION APPLICATION APPLICATION Figure 1 around for a while to find them. VISA VISA The main reason that IEEE 488 will LIBRARY LIBRARY survive for so long is that, for years to come, many instruments with IEEE 488 VXI-11 VXI-11 ASCII GPIB CLIENT CLIENT ports will continue to perform useful SERIAL WINDOWS-BASED ETHERNET work for their owners. Instruments such OSCILLOSCOPE LAN GPIB-LAN ADAPTER as benchtop DMMs measure quantities WINDOWS-SIDE EMBEDDED-SOFTWARE SIDE ETHERNET WITH VXI-11 GPIB OF INSTRUMENT OF INSTRUMENT such as volts, amperes, and ohms, which LAN HARDWARE RS-232 USER will not change in 20 years—or ever. Sure, HARDWARE APPLICATION newer DMMs will be faster, more accu- VXI-11 SERVER rate, and less expensive and will measure VISA VXI-11 LIBRARY lower currents and higher resistances, but CLIENT if you own a DMM that meets your needs ASCII VIRTUAL SOFTWARE SERIAL GPIB and still reliably meets its specifications, GPIB GPIB CONNECTION you require a strong incentive to replace NON-WINDOWS-BASED it. On the other hand, some types of in- INSTRUMENTS struments, such as oscilloscopes, change The software architecture of a system that incorporates IEEE 488 and RS-232 interfaces can more rapidly. Signal speeds continue to appear daunting, but, with modern development tools and instrument drivers, application devel- increase, making wider bandwidth scopes opment is generally less difficult than this diagram suggests (courtesy Tektronix). 50 edn | June 12, 2003 www.edn.com designfeature IEEE 488 The most obvious reasons for turning derstanding instrument I/O: perfor- IEEE 488 connectors and cables. to computer-standard interfaces in place mance and protocols”). In fact, in typi- Industry groups and software vendors of IEEE 488 for instruments are cost, cal instrumentation applications, which are hard at work on the infrastructure size, cable length of instrument net- involve short messages, IEEE 488, rather problem. They aim to make customers’ works, and increasing difficulty of in- like the tortoise that won the race with libraries of control routines work with- stalling specialized peripheral controllers the hare, can prove faster than protocols out modification through the PC’s USB in newer PCs. Here, “PCs” refer not just that are nominally hundreds of times as or Ethernet port and the corresponding to laptops, but also to the new breed of fast. Besides speed, the most important ports of instruments that lack IEEE 488 small desktop machines in “sealed” en- reasons for staying with IEEE 488 are the interfaces. Moreover, several companies closures. Greater speed, an apparent ad- existence of such a large infrastructure now offer external adapters, which let vantage of the newer interfaces, is often supporting it, instruments’ long service PCs that provide only USB or Ethernet an illusion, however (see sidebar,“Un- lives, and the physical ruggedness of ports and lack IEEE 488 ports control in- UNDERSTANDING INSTRUMENT I/O: PERFORMANCE AND PROTOCOLS By Joe Mueller, Agilent Technologies With alternatives to IEEE 488 The USB implementers’ forum the system sends more short RPCs (remote-procedure becoming available for instru- has recently completed defining transactions than long ones. In calls): These calls enable func- mentation, understanding the the USBTMC (USB Test and these cases, the time to do a tions called in one computer to impact of selecting new I/O Measurement Committee) short transaction is a better pre- execute in a remote computer.
Recommended publications
  • Getting Started with Your VXI-1394 Interface for Windows NT/98 And
    VXI Getting Started with Your VXI-1394 Interface for Windows NT/98 VXI-1394 Interface for Windows NT/98 November 1999 Edition Part Number 322109D-01 Worldwide Technical Support and Product Information www.ni.com National Instruments Corporate Headquarters 11500 North Mopac Expressway Austin, Texas 78759-3504 USA Tel: 512 794 0100 Worldwide Offices Australia 03 9879 5166, Austria 0662 45 79 90 0, Belgium 02 757 00 20, Brazil 011 284 5011, Canada (Calgary) 403 274 9391, Canada (Ontario) 905 785 0085, Canada (Québec) 514 694 8521, China 0755 3904939, Denmark 45 76 26 00, Finland 09 725 725 11, France 01 48 14 24 24, Germany 089 741 31 30, Greece 30 1 42 96 427, Hong Kong 2645 3186, India 91805275406, Israel 03 6120092, Italy 02 413091, Japan 03 5472 2970, Korea 02 596 7456, Mexico (D.F.) 5 280 7625, Mexico (Monterrey) 8 357 7695, Netherlands 0348 433466, Norway 32 27 73 00, Poland 48 22 528 94 06, Portugal 351 1 726 9011, Singapore 2265886, Spain 91 640 0085, Sweden 08 587 895 00, Switzerland 056 200 51 51, Taiwan 02 2377 1200, United Kingdom 01635 523545 For further support information, see the Technical Support Resources appendix. To comment on the documentation, send e-mail to [email protected] © Copyright 1998, 1999 National Instruments Corporation. All rights reserved. Important Information Warranty The National Instruments VXI-1394 board is warranted against defects in materials and workmanship for a period of one year from the date of shipment, as evidenced by receipts or other documentation. National Instruments will, at its option, repair or replace equipment that proves to be defective during the warranty period.
    [Show full text]
  • A Technology Comparison Adopting Ultra-Wideband for Memsen’S File Sharing and Wireless Marketing Platform
    A Technology Comparison Adopting Ultra-Wideband for Memsen’s file sharing and wireless marketing platform What is Ultra-Wideband Technology? Memsen Corporation 1 of 8 • Ultra-Wideband is a proposed standard for short-range wireless communications that aims to replace Bluetooth technology in near future. • It is an ideal solution for wireless connectivity in the range of 10 to 20 meters between consumer electronics (CE), mobile devices, and PC peripheral devices which provides very high data-rate while consuming very little battery power. It offers the best solution for bandwidth, cost, power consumption, and physical size requirements for next generation consumer electronic devices. • UWB radios can use frequencies from 3.1 GHz to 10.6 GHz, a band more than 7 GHz wide. Each radio channel can have a bandwidth of more than 500 MHz depending upon its center frequency. Due to such a large signal bandwidth, FCC has put severe broadcast power restrictions. By doing so UWB devices can make use of extremely wide frequency band while emitting very less amount of energy to get detected by other narrower band devices. Hence, a UWB device signal can not interfere with other narrower band device signals and because of this reason a UWB device can co-exist with other wireless devices. • UWB is considered as Wireless USB – replacement of standard USB and fire wire (IEEE 1394) solutions due to its higher data-rate compared to USB and fire wire. • UWB signals can co-exists with other short/large range wireless communications signals due to its own nature of being detected as noise to other signals.
    [Show full text]
  • LPT, COM, 1394, USB, USB-C LPT IEEE 1284, LPT (Англ. Line Print Terminal; Также Параллельный Порт, По
    LPT, COM, 1394, USB, USB-C LPT IEEE 1284, LPT (англ. Line Print Terminal; также параллельный порт, порт принтера) — международный стандарт параллельного интерфейса для подключения периферийных устройств персонального компьютера. В основном используется для подключения к компьютеру принтера, сканера и других внешних устройств (часто использовался для подключения внешних устройств хранения данных), однако может применяться и для других целей (организация связи между двумя компьютерами, подключение каких-либо механизмов телесигнализации и телеуправления). В основе данного стандарта лежит интерфейс Centronics и его расширенные версии (ECP, EPP). Название LPT образовано от наименования стандартного устройства принтера LPT1 (Line Printer Terminal или Line PrinTer) в операционных системах семейства MS-DOS. Параллельный порт Centronics — порт, используемый с 1981 года в персональных компьютерах фирмы IBM для подключения печатающих устройств, разработан фирмой Centronics Data Computer Corporation; уже давно стал стандартом де-факто, хотя в действительности официально на данный момент он не стандартизирован. Изначально этот порт был разработан только для симплексной (однонаправленной) передачи данных, так как предполагалось, что порт Centronics должен использоваться только для работы с принтером. Впоследствии разными фирмами были разработаны дуплексные расширения интерфейса (byte mode, EPP, ECP). Затем был принят международный стандарт IEEE 1284, описывающий как базовый интерфейс Centronics, так и все его расширения. Разъемы. Порт на стороне управляющего
    [Show full text]
  • PC 97 Hardware Design Guide
    Part 4 — Device Design Guidelines CHAPTER 21 Printers This chapter presents the requirements and recommendations for printers under the Microsoft Windows family of operating systems. Version 1.1 Includes changes to References for Printers Contents Overview for Printers.............................. ............... 312 Basic Printer Features............................. ................ 312 Basic Features for IEEE 1394 Printers. ................. 312 Basic Features for USB Printers . ............... 312 Basic Features for IEEE 1284 Printers. ................. 313 PC 97 Design for Printers .......................... ................ 314 Plug and Play for Printers. ............... 314 Power Management for Print Components . .............. 315 Device Drivers and Installation for Printers . .................... 315 References for Printers ............................ ................ 318 Checklist for Printers ............................. ................ 320 312 PC 97 Design — Part 4 Device Design Guidelines Overview for Printers This section presents the key design issues for printers under Microsoft Windows. Printers and other devices attached to parallel ports should be capable of high- speed, bidirectional data transfers. The design criteria for parallel devices follow those for parallel ports described in the “Serial, Parallel, and Wireless Support” chapter. The PC 97 requirements for printers and parallel ports seek to ensure the following: • Ensure maximum speed for transfer of parallel data between the system and the peripheral. • Ensure a true Plug and Play experience for users. Basic Printer Features This section summarizes the basic hardware requirements for printers for PC 97. Basic Features for IEEE 1394 Printers This section defines requirements for printers that use IEEE 1394. 1. Compliance with PC 97 requirements for IEEE 1394 Required This bus is recommended in PC 97 for support of fast, high-density data transfer. For information about implementing IEEE 1394 for PC 97, see the “IEEE 1394” chapter in Part 3 of this guide.
    [Show full text]
  • From Camac to Wireless Sensor Networks and Time- Triggered Systems and Beyond: Evolution of Computer Interfaces for Data Acquisition and Control
    Janusz Zalewski / International Journal of Computing, 15(2) 2016, 92-106 Print ISSN 1727-6209 [email protected] On-line ISSN 2312-5381 www.computingonline.net International Journal of Computing FROM CAMAC TO WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS AND TIME- TRIGGERED SYSTEMS AND BEYOND: EVOLUTION OF COMPUTER INTERFACES FOR DATA ACQUISITION AND CONTROL. PART I Janusz Zalewski Dept. of Software Engineering, Florida Gulf Coast University Fort Myers, FL 33965, USA [email protected], http://www.fgcu.edu/zalewski/ Abstract: The objective of this paper is to present a historical overview of design choices for data acquisition and control systems, from the first developments in CAMAC, through the evolution of their designs operating in VMEbus, Firewire and USB, to the latest developments concerning distributed systems using, in particular, wireless protocols and time-triggered architecture. First part of the overview is focused on connectivity aspects, including buses and interconnects, as well as their standardization. More sophisticated designs and a number of challenges are addressed in the second part, among them: bus performance, bus safety and security, and others. Copyright © Research Institute for Intelligent Computer Systems, 2016. All rights reserved. Keywords: Data Acquisition, Computer Control, CAMAC, Computer Buses, VMEbus, Firewire, USB. 1. INTRODUCTION which later became international standards adopted by IEC and IEEE [4]-[7]. The design and development of data acquisition The CAMAC standards played a significant role and control systems has been driven by applications. in developing data acquisition and control The earliest and most prominent of those were instrumentation not only for nuclear research, but applications in scientific experimentation, which also for research in general and for industry as well arose in the early sixties of the previous century, [8].
    [Show full text]
  • Cable Discharge Event (CDE) Automated Test System Based on TLP Method
    Cable Discharge Event (CDE) Automated Test System Based on TLP Method Draft V3-2016.03.18 Wei Huang, Jerry Tichenor Web: www.esdemc.com Email: [email protected] Tel: (+1) 573-202-6411 Fax: (+1) 877-641-9358 Address: 4000 Enterprise Drive, Suite 103, Rolla, MO, 65401 Cable Discharge Event (CDE) Background What is CDE Event ? A Cable Discharge Event (CDE) is electrostatic discharge(s) between metal of a cable connector and the mating cable connector or plug. It is very common in daily life. When CDE happens, transient high current and high voltage pulses are generated into the connector pins and cause potential damage to the system with connector. The pulse characteristic is determined by the cable type, cable length, physical arrangement of the cable and system with connector, and system with connector side circuitry. A Generic CDE System Concept Why understanding CDE robustness is important ? The discharge processes are complicated due to the number of pins involved and their connections to a system. In addition, the occurrence rate and severity of the static discharge is important to design a robust system. Basic System Features: A well repeatable test setup to reproduce cable discharge events Pulse injection level covers different types of cable connections Additional System Features: Automatic computer controlled test for all available connector pins Automatic remove DUT residue charge safely after each pulse safely Integrate current and voltage probes to monitor CDE events on each pin ESDEMC Collected Cable Pins and Practical Passive
    [Show full text]
  • Bluetooth Network Encapsulation Protocol (BNEP) Specification
    Bluetooth Network Encapsulation Protocol Specification Bluetooth Network Encapsulation Protocol (BNEP) Specification Abstract: The Personal Area Networking (PAN) Bluetooth Network Encapsulation Specification describes the protocol to be used by the Bluetooth PAN profiles. This document defines a packet format for Bluetooth network encapsulation used to transport common networking protocols over the Bluetooth media. Bluetooth network encapsulation supports the same networking protocols that are supported by IEEE 802.3/Ethernet encapsulation. Packets from the supported networking protocols are contained in Bluetooth network encapsulation packets, which are transported directly over the Bluetooth L2CAP protocol. Introduction June 12, 2001 Page 1 Bluetooth Network Encapsulation Protocol (BNEP) Specification Page 2 of 2 Revision 0.95a Disclaimer and copyright notice The copyright in these specifications is owned by the Promoter Members of Bluetooth SIG, Inc. (“Bluetooth SIG”). Use of these specifications and any related intellectual property (collectively, the “Specification”), is governed by the Promoters Membership Agreement among the Promoter Members and Bluetooth SIG (the “Promoters Agreement”), certain membership agreements between Bluetooth SIG and its Adopter and Associate Members (the “Membership Agreements”) and the Bluetooth Specification Early Adopters Agreements (1.2 Early Adopters Agreements) among Early Adopter members of the unincorporated Bluetooth special interest group and the Promoter Members (the “Early Adopters Agreement”). Certain rights and obligations of the Promoter Members under the Early Adopters Agreements have been assigned to Bluetooth SIG by the Promoter Members. Use of the Specification by anyone who is not a member of Bluetooth SIG or a party to an Early Adopters Agreement (each such person or party, a “Member”), is prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Port 2B 1A 1394 PCI Express Firewire Card Adapter Startech ID: PEX1394B3
    3 Port 2b 1a 1394 PCI Express FireWire Card Adapter StarTech ID: PEX1394B3 This 3 Port PCI Express FireWire adapter card can be installed in a PCI Express slot to add two IEEE1394b (FireWire 800 - 9 pin) ports and one IEEE1394a (FireWire 400 - 6 pin) port, providing broad compatibility with a wide range of FireWire devices (e.g. DV camcorders, external hard drives, digital cameras, etc.). The 2b, 1a card features a native (single chip) PCI Express chipset - resulting in faster, more reliable and cost effective performance than expansion cards that utilize a "bridge" chip. Applications and Solutions • Add a high speed FireWire port to a desktop without any FireWire ports • Connect a digital camera to a desktop with a PCI Express slot to download photos and video • Connect a high-speed external hard drive to a PCI Express-enabled system Features • Two 9-pin FireWire 800 ports, each with transfer rates up to 800Mbps • One 6-pin FireWire 400 port, each with transfer rates up to 400Mbps • Built with a native PCI Express chipset, no bridge chip • Includes low profile/half-height installation bracket • Internal power connector for high powered FireWire devices • Compliant with IEEE 1394b and backwards compatible with IEEE 1394a - 2000 as well as 1394-1995 standards • Plug-and-Play and hot-swap compatible Technical Specifications • Warranty: Lifetime warranty • Bus Type: PCI Express • External Ports: 1 - FireWire 6-pin Female • External Ports: 2 - FireWire 800 9-pin Female • Maximum Data Transfer Rate: 800000000 Kbits/Sec • Number of Ports: 3 • Carton Quantity: 40 • Industry Standards: IEEE-1394 • Industry Standards: IEEE-1394A • Industry Standards: IEEE-1394B • Industry Standards: OHCI • Industry Standards: PCI 2.2 • Shipping (Package) Weight: 0.49 lb [0.22 kg] • Chipset: LSI/Agere FW643 • Note: The software included with this product supports a "typical" driver install only.
    [Show full text]
  • USB 3.0 Overview What Is USB 3.0?
    USB 3.0 Overview What is USB 3.0? USB 3.0 is a new specification for USB, known as USB SuperSpeed. The new specification has made many improvements over the USB 2.0 specification. A few of the major improvements is the increased data transfer rate and power. The speed of USB 3.0 surpasses existing USB specifications, eSATA, and IEEE-1394 (FireWire), making it an ideal solution for external data storage media. What you should know? • Currently there are only a limited number of USB 3.0 devices on the market, primarily external storage devices. • External solid state media can now reach full read and write potential using this new specification and hardware. • It is important to note, that overhead from protocol, hardware limitations, and chipset limitations prevent file transfer at a true 4.8 Gbps. The actual "real world" achievable rate is called the throughput, and is approximately 600 Mbps. • It is also important to note that USB 3.0 utilizes new connector types. These new connectors will not fit into older USB 2.0 & 1.1 devices; however USB 2.0 & 1.1 cabling will fit into USB 3.0 devices and will operate at lower transfer speeds and features. What application is it best for? USB 3.0 is designed for data transfer to and from large mass storage devices. A few examples would be transferring data from a large hard drive, HD video for video editing or Blu-Ray authoring, or high resolution photos for editing and storage. What hardware is required to experience the benefits of USB 3.0? A computer equipped with USB 3.0 ports, a USB 3.0 device and USB 3.0 cabling is required to experience the features of the specification.
    [Show full text]
  • Connectivity Chapter 2 This Presentation Covers
    Connectivity Chapter 2 This presentation covers: >Computer Ports > Devices Connected to Ports The purpose of various computer ports What to do if you don’t have a particular port What types of devices connect to specific ports Symbols and colors associated with particular ports External Connectivity • A port: is a connector on a motherboard or on a separate adapter that allows a device to connect to a computer. • Many port connections are either male or female. • Male ports: have metal pins that protrude from the connector. A male port requires a cable with a female connector. • Female ports: have holes in the connector into which the male cable pins are inserted. External Connectivity • Some connectors on integrated motherboards are either D-shell connectors (They are named for their characteristic D-shaped metal shield) or DIN connectors. (A DIN connector is an electrical connector that was originally standardized by the Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN), the German national standards organization) • A D-shell connector (sometimes called a D-sub): has more pins or holes on top than on the bottom, so a cable connected to the D-shell connector can be inserted in only one direction. • Many documents represent a D-shell connector by using the letters DB, a hyphen, and the number of pins—for example, DB-9, DB-15, or DB-25. External Connectivity • A mini-DIN-6 connector: is round with small holes and is normally keyed. When a connector is keyed, the cable can be inserted only one way. • Keyboard and mouse connectors, commonly called PS/2 ports(Its name comes from the IBM Personal System/2 series of personal computers), are examples of mini-DIN connectors.
    [Show full text]
  • IEEE 1394: Changing the Way We Do Multimedia Communications
    Peiya Liu Standards Siemens Corporate Research IEEE 1394: Changing the Way We Do Multimedia Communications he mark of a good bus design is to be general- dard provides a way to move high-bandwidth Tpurpose enough so that its use expands to video and audio digital traffic among peer applications beyond those for which it was origi- devices—digital video recorders, DVD, cam- nally intended. Compare the narrowly defined corders, and high-speed/high-resolution printers EISA (Extended Industry Standard Architecture) and scanners. It supports hot-swapping and plug- David Thompson specification and the now-defunct MicroChannel and-play to improve the experience of consumers Bell Labs bus to the vibrant IEEE 1394 standard, which has who want to use 1394-enabled products. In addi- numerous specifications built around it already, tion, IEEE 1394b is waiting in the wings with and many more under development. speeds up to 1,600 Mbps and 3,200 Mbps on the This article highlights some of the many appli- horizon. cations made possible—or made better—by One of the advantages of choosing a serial expanding on the 1394 standard. It also directs interface over a parallel interface is the reduced you to the key specifications that have developed size of the required connectors and cables—an for each of the application areas. important consideration in portable consumer products where the IEEE 1394 first made inroads. What is the 1394 specification? The 1394 spec calls for six wires—two differential First introduced as Firewire by Apple Comput- pairs plus power and ground. The protocol defines er in the late 1980s, the now-approved IEEE 1394 two connectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Communication Architectures for Spacecraft Modular Avionics Systems D.A
    National Aeronautics and NASA/TM—2006–214431 Space Administration IS20 George C. Marshall Space Flight Center Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama 35812 Comparison of Communication Architectures for Spacecraft Modular Avionics Systems D.A. Gwaltney and J.M. Briscoe Marshall Space Flight Center, Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama June 2006 The NASA STI Program Office…in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected the advancement of aeronautics and space papers from scientific and technical conferences, science. The NASA Scientific and Technical symposia, seminars, or other meetings sponsored Information (STI) Program Office plays a key or cosponsored by NASA. part in helping NASA maintain this important role. • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, technical, or historical information from NASA programs, The NASA STI Program Office is operated by projects, and mission, often concerned with Langley Research Center, the lead center for subjects having substantial public interest. NASA’s scientific and technical information. The NASA STI Program Office provides access to • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. the NASA STI Database, the largest collection of English-language translations of foreign aeronautical and space science STI in the world. scientific and technical material pertinent to The Program Office is also NASA’s institutional NASA’s mission. mechanism for disseminating the results of its research and development activities. These results Specialized services that complement the STI are published by NASA in the NASA STI Report Program Office’s diverse offerings include creating Series, which includes the following report types: custom thesauri, building customized databases, organizing and publishing research results…even • TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of providing videos. completed research or a major significant phase of research that present the results of For more information about the NASA STI Program NASA programs and include extensive data Office, see the following: or theoretical analysis.
    [Show full text]