DECISION (Unofficial Translation) No 53/2018/2 Document No ESAVI

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DECISION (Unofficial Translation) No 53/2018/2 Document No ESAVI DECISION (Unofficial translation) Southern Finland No 53/2018/2 Document No ESAVI/9101/2017 Issued after publication 12 April 2018 SUBJECT Construction of two natural gas pipelines in the Finnish exclusive economic zone and authorisation for preparation APPLICANT Nord Stream 2 AG REGIONAL STATE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY FOR SOUTHERN FINLAND / ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS DEPARTMENT │ [email protected] tel. +358 29 501 6000 Hämeenlinna Office Birger Helsinki office fax +358 3 570 8002 Jaarlin katu 15 Ratapihantie 9 [email protected] PO Box 150, FI-13101 PO Box 110, FI-00521 Helsinki www.avi.fi/etela Hämeenlinna 2 (110) FILING OF THE APPLICATION .......................................................................................................... 4 GROUNDS FOR APPLYING FOR THE PERMIT AND THE PERMIT AUTHORITY’S COMPETENCE ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) ............................................................................. 4 PERMITS AND DECISIONS CONCERNING THE PROJECT AND PROTECTED AREAS ................ 5 Permits and decisions ....................................................................................................................... 5 Natura 2000 sites ............................................................................................................................... 5 Seal sanctuaries................................................................................................................................. 5 Cultural heritage sites ....................................................................................................................... 5 CONTENTS OF THE PERMIT APPLICATION .................................................................................... 6 Purpose and overview of the project ................................................................................................ 6 Information about the waters in the area ......................................................................................... 6 Water resources and marine resources management plans and status of waters ....................... 9 Use of the sea area .......................................................................................................................... 10 Works and structures ...................................................................................................................... 11 Agreements and consents relating to the project ......................................................................... 23 Property details ................................................................................................................................ 23 Impacts of the project ...................................................................................................................... 23 Measures to prevent or reduce losses ........................................................................................... 31 Benefits and losses resulting from the project .............................................................................. 34 Monitoring ........................................................................................................................................ 37 Application for authorisation for preparation ................................................................................ 38 NATURA 2000 SITES ....................................................................................................................... 40 Natura 2000 screening studies ....................................................................................................... 40 Natura 2000 assessments ............................................................................................................... 45 Opinions issued on account of the Natura assessments and screening studies ....................... 47 PUBLICITY OF THE APPLICATION ................................................................................................. 50 STATEMENTS .................................................................................................................................. 50 OBJECTIONS AND OPINIONS ......................................................................................................... 64 ADDITIONS TO THE APPLICATION AND THE APPLICANT’S RESPONSES ................................ 67 Additions to the application (19 January 2018) concerning munitions clearance and alternative clearance techniques 67 Applicant’s responses ..................................................................................................................... 68 ADDITIONS TO THE APPLICATION (5 FEBRUARY 2018) CONCERNING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS MONITORING PROGRAMME .......................................................................................... 78 ADDITIONS TO THE APPLICATION (12 MARCH 2018) .................................................................. 82 NOTE ................................................................................................................................................. 82 DECISION OF THE REGIONAL STATE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY ............................................ 83 3 (110) Permit decision ................................................................................................................................ 83 Permit provisions ............................................................................................................................. 83 Grounds ............................................................................................................................................ 91 Factoring in environmental impact assessments .......................................................................... 98 Factoring in statements given by countries pursuant to the environmental impact assessment procedure in a transboundary context ........................................................................................... 99 Applicable legal provisions ........................................................................................................... 104 Authorisation for preparation ....................................................................................................... 104 Grounds .......................................................................................................................................... 104 Applicable legal provisions ........................................................................................................... 106 Responses to statements and objections .................................................................................... 106 PROCESSING FEE AND GROUNDS ............................................................................................. 107 RECIPIENTS OF THE DECISION ................................................................................................... 107 NOTIFICATION OF INTERESTED PARTIES .................................................................................. 108 APPEALS ........................................................................................................................................ 110 4 (110) FILING OF THE APPLICATION Nord Stream 2 AG filed an application with the Regional State Administrative Agency for Southern Finland on 19 September 2017 and subsequently supplied additions to the application concerning a permit for the construction of two natural gas pipelines in the Finnish exclusive economic zone and authorisation for commencing preparations for the implementation of the project prior to the decision becoming legally enforceable. GROUNDS FOR APPLYING FOR THE PERMIT AND THE PERMIT AUTHORITY’S COMPETENCE Finnish Water Act, Chapter 3, Sections 2 and 3(4) and Chapter 1, Section 7(1) Finnish Act on the Finnish Exclusive Economic Zone, Section 18 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) An environmental impact assessment (EIA) report on the Nord Stream 2 project was completed on 3 April 2017. The Uusimaa Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment, which acts as the coordinating authority, issued a statement on the assessment report on 26 July 2017, according to which the assessment report complies with the content requirements for assessment reports laid down in Section 10 of the Finnish Decree on Environmental Impact Assessment Procedure. Transboundary environmental impacts were also taken into account in the EIA procedure pursuant to Sections 14, 15 and 22 of the Finnish Act on Environmental Impact Assessment Procedure. Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Sweden, Germany, Denmark, Russia and Estonia were consulted in the course of the procedure. The procedure factored in the obligations laid down in the Espoo Convention (Finnish Treaty No 67/1997). In its statement, the coordinating authority concluded that the assessment report had been drawn up appropriately and that it was sufficient considering the stage of the EIA procedure. According to the EIA report, the most important harmful impacts of the project will occur during the construction phase and affect marine mammals that are the basis for the protection of Natura 2000 sites. Any available measures must be taken to mitigate the harmful impacts of the project. The statement stipulates that the project’s deleterious impacts on Natura 2000 sites must be evaluated in more detail
Recommended publications
  • Luonnos Liiteaineisto 1: Viheryhteystarpeiden Kuvaukset
    Uusimaa-kaava 2050: Luonnos Liiteaineisto 1: Viheryhteystarpeiden kuvaukset Nähtävillä 8.10. 9.11.2018 Lausunnoilla 8.10. 30.11.2018 1 Uusimaa-kaava 2050 Muu liiteaineisto: Viheryhteystarpeiden kuvaukset Uusimaa-kaavassa osoitetaan viheryhteystarpeina ekologisesta ja virkistyksellisestä verkostosta ne yhteystarpeet, joiden toteuttaminen edellyttää muusta maankäytöstä johtuvaa yhteensovittamista. Viheryhteystarve -merkintää on käytetty sekä metsäisillä alueilla, jonne suunnitellaan uutta rakentamista, että jo kaventuneilla viherkäytävillä ja väylien ylitys- tai alituskohdissa taajamien ulkopuolella. Viheryhteystarpeiden linjauksiin on sovellettu eri periaatteita eri tyyppisillä alueilla. Tässä liiteaineistossa esitetään tiedot Uusimaa-kaavan luonnoksessa osoitetuista viheryhteystarpeista. Yhteystarpeista kuvataan niiden sijainti, mahdolliset esteet ja maankäyttöpaineet sekä lähtötiedot, joihin yhteystarpeen linjaukset perustuvat. Yhteystarpeet on koostettu seuduittain (Länsi-Uusimaa, Helsingin seutu ja Itä-Uusimaa). Viheryhteystarvemerkinnän kaavaratkaisu ja suunnitteluperiaatteet esitetään tarkemmin kaavaselostuksessa. 2 VIHERYHTEYSTARPEIDEN KUVAUKSET Maakuntakaavan viheryhteystarvemerkintä 50 49 51 70 19 8 42 69 41 7 48 60 71 72 74 80 73 68 52 78 18 79 65 77 0 10 20 30 59 76 km 17 16 57 75 66 Pohjakartta-aineisto © MML, 2018 15 58 Baskartmaterial © LMV, 2018 32 66 67 ¢ 33 34 56 61 14 12 53 11 64 13 47 31 39 26 43 27 38 40 54 9 62 55 63 30 35 46 37 28 29 36 10 44 23 25 45 20 6 22 24 5 25 21 25 3 4 2 1 UUSIMAA-KAAVA 2050 | NYLANDSPLANEN
    [Show full text]
  • I Suomenlahti – Finska Viken – Gulf of Finland
    Tm/UfS/NtM 20.04.2011 11 210 - 227 1 I Suomenlahti – Finska viken – Gulf of Finland *210.(T) 191 A, B/626/626_1 Suomi. Helsinki. Poistettu kävelyponttonisilta. Uunisaarensalmi avattu liiken- teelle. Finland. Helsingfors. Indragen pontonbro. Ugnsholmssundet har öppnats för sjötrafik. Finland. Helsinki. Withdrawn pontoon footbridge. Uunisaarensalmi has been opened for vessel traffic. TM/UfS/NtM 32/523/2010(T) kumotaan/utgår/cancelled Yksityiskohtia: Merisataman rannassa Ehrenströmintien ja Pohjoisen Uunisaaren välinen Uunisaarensalmen kävelyponttonisilta siirretään 15.4.2011 jäätilanteen salliessa. Lisätietoja www.hel.fi/liikunta Detaljer: Pontonbron som ligger vid Havshamnen mellan Ehrenströmsvägen och Norra Ugnsholmen flyttas 15.4.2011 om isläget tillåter. Mer information: www.hel.fi/hki/Liv/sv/Etusivu Details: The pontoon footbridge at Merisatama between Ehrenströmintie and Pohjoinen Uunisaari will, ice situation permitting, be moved on 15 April 2011. More information on www.hel.fi/liikunta Paikka – Position – Position WGS-84 60°09.24’N 24°57.19’E (Helsingin kaupunki/Helsingfors stad/City of Helsinki, 2011) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2 *211. 17, 952 A/621/622 Suomi. Porvoo. Hakasalon väylä (4.5 m). Väylälinjauksen muutos. Turvalaite- muutokset. Karttamerkintä. Finland. Borgå. Haxalöleden (4.5 m). Ändrad farledsdragning. Ändrad utprick- ning. Kartmarkering. Finland. Porvoo. Hakasalo channel (4.5 m). Amended channel alignment. Amend buoyage. Insert in chart. A. Väylän keskilinja – Farledens mittlinje – Fairway centre line WGS 84 1) 60°15.6935’N 25°40.9848’E Alku/begynnelsep./starting point 2) 60 13.6908 25 42.3055 3) 60 12.5319 25 42.8624 Risteys/korsning/crossing 4) 60 12.3738 25 42.9383 Risteys/korsning/crossing 5) 60 11.8750 25 43.1778 Loppu/ändpunkt/end point Läntinen haara – Västra förgreningen – Western branch WGS 84 1) 60°12.5319’N 25°42.8624’E Alku/begynnelsep./starting point 2) 60 12.0800 25 42.0396 Loppu/ändpunkt/end point Poista vanha keskilinja.
    [Show full text]
  • Saaristomme on Suojeltava
    RAPORTTI 2014 WWF Suomen raportteja 32 SAARISTOMME ON SUOJELtaVA — Esitys Saaristomeren, Tammisaaren saariston ja Itäisen Suomenlahden kansallispuistojen suojelun kehittämiseksi ja Porkkalan kansallispuiston perustamiseksi SISÄLLYS Esipuhe 4 Yhteenveto 6 1. Johdanto 8 2. Luonnon monimuotoisuus eteläisissä saaristokansallispuistoissa 11 2.1 Vedenalainen luonto 12 2.2 Saaristomeren kansallispuisto 14 2.3 Tammisaaren saariston kansallispuisto 14 2.4 Itäisen Suomenlahden kansallispuisto 15 3. Suojelun nykytilanne 17 3.1 Saaristomeren kansallispuisto 17 3.2 Tammisaaren saariston kansallispuisto 19 3.3 Itäisen Suomenlahden kansallispuisto 20 4. Kansallispuistojen laajentaminen 22 4.1 Yleistä 22 4.2 Saaristomeren kansallispuisto 22 4.3 Tammisaaren saariston kansallispuisto 30 4.4 Itäisen Suomenlahden kansallispuisto 34 5. Luontotyyppien ja lajiston suojelun kehittäminen 41 5.1 Yleistä 41 5.2 Saaristomeren kansallispuisto 44 5.3 Tammisaaren saariston kansallispuisto 45 5.4 Itäisen Suomenlahden kansallispuisto 47 6. Uudelleen perustettava Porkkalan kansallispuisto 48 6.1 Kansallispuiston perustamisen tarve 48 6.2 Kansallispuiston laajuus ja maantieteellinen rajaus 52 6.3 Kansallispuistoon liittyvät luonnonsuojelulliset arvot 55 7. Muut suojelun kehittämisen toimenpiteet 56 Kiitokset 60 Lähteet 61 Liitteet 63 Liite 1. Porkkalan esitetyn kansallispuistoalueen uhanalaiset ja silmälläpidettävät eliölajit sekä luonto- ja lintudirektiivin I-liitteen lajit 63 Liite 2. Porkkalan esitetyn kansallispuiston Natura- alueiden luontodirektiivin suojeltavat
    [Show full text]
  • The Wave Spectrum in Archipelagos
    Ocean Sci., 15, 1469–1487, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-1469-2019 © Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. The wave spectrum in archipelagos Jan-Victor Björkqvist, Heidi Pettersson, and Kimmo K. Kahma Finnish Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 503, 00101, Helsinki, Finland Correspondence: Jan-Victor Björkqvist (jan-victor.bjorkqvist@fmi.fi) Received: 28 May 2019 – Discussion started: 19 June 2019 Revised: 12 September 2019 – Accepted: 9 October 2019 – Published: 13 November 2019 Abstract. Sea surface waves are important for marine safety 1 Introduction and coastal engineering, but mapping the wave properties at complex shorelines, such as coastal archipelagos, is chal- lenging. The wave spectrum, E.f /, contains a majority of Since the 1950s the wave spectrum has been the central way the information about the wave field, and its properties have to define the properties of random sea-surface wind waves been studied for decades. Nevertheless, any systematic re- (Pierson and Marks, 1952). Although the exact power law search into the wave spectrum in archipelagos has not been describing the high-frequency part of the spectrum is still made. In this paper we present wave buoy measurements an open question (e.g. Phillips, 1958; Toba, 1973; Kitaig- from 14 locations in the Finnish archipelago. The shape of orodskii, 1983; Kahma, 1981; Banner, 1990; Lenain and the wave spectrum showed a systematic transition from a Melville, 2017), the central determining feature has been the single-peaked spectrum to a spectrum with a wide frequency location of the spectral maximum, which then consequently range having almost constant energy.
    [Show full text]
  • I Suomenlahti – Finska Viken – Gulf of Finland
    1 TM/UfS/NtM 6-7/73 - 95/10.3.2010 I Suomenlahti – Finska viken – Gulf of Finland *73. 22, 136, 136_A B/636/637/637_1/638 Suomi. Hanko. Kistskär-Tulliniemi-väylä (7.3 m). Valaistujen linjamerkkien muu- tokset. Karttamerkinnän muutos. Finland. Hangö. Farleden Kistskär-Tulludden (7.3 m). Ändrade belysta ensmär- ken. Ändrad kartmarkering. Finland. Hanko. Kistskär-Tulliniemi channel (7.3 m). Amended leading lighted beacons. Amend chart. Linjamerkkien uudet valotunnukset – Ny fyrkaraktär för ensmärken – New light character for leading beacons: Nr Nimi/Namn/Name WGS 84 11327 Tulliniemi al, nedre, front 59°48.6716’N 22°54.75’E Lisää Poista Inför Q.R. Stryk Q.Y. Insert Delete 11328 Tulliniemi yl, övre, rear 59 48.699 22 54.8407 Lisää Poista Inför LFl(6)R Stryk Q.Y. Insert Delete (LV/TV/FTA, Helsinki/Helsingfors 2010) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *74. (T) 18, 191 A,B/626/626_1 Suomi. Helsinki. Kaapelitehtaan väylä (6.9 m). Väylän tilapäinen madaltaminen 4.0 metriin. Finland. Helsingfors. Kabelfabriksleden ( 6.9 m). Tillfällig reducering av led- djupgåendet i farleden från 6.9 m till 4.0 m. Finland. Helsinki. Kaapelitehdas channel (6.9 m). Maximum authorised draught temporarily reduced from 6.9 m to 4.0 m in the channel. 2 Ajankohta: Toistaiseksi Tidpunkt: Tills vidare Time: Until further notice Väylän tilapäinen madallus 4.0 metriin seuraavien pisteiden välillä – Tillfällig �����redu- cering till 4.0 m mellan följande punkter – Temporary reduction to 4.0 m between the following positions: WGS 84 60°09.3658’N 24°53.9561’E 60 09.6221 24 54.0870 (LV/TV/FTA, Helsinki/Helsingfors 2010) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- II Saaristomeri ja Ahvenanmeri Skärgårdshavet och Ålands hav Archipelago Sea and Sea of Åland *75.
    [Show full text]
  • Virkistysverkosto- Selvitys 2020
    Virkistysverkosto- selvitys 2020 Kuntakehitysjaosto 22.12.2020 Tausta: TA 2020 tavoite - virkistysverkostoselvitys Kirkkonummen talous- ja toimintasuunnitelmassa 2020 sitova tavoite • Selvitetään kunnan virkistysverkosto olemassa olevien selvitysten, suunnitelmien ja kehityskuvien pohjalta • Verkostosta viestitään aktiivisesti kuntalaisille • TA2020:ssa kolme muuta selvitysvelvoitetta, jotka linkittyvät virkistysverkostoselvitykseen Virkistysverkostoselvitykseen liittyviä TA 2020 ja elinvoimaohjelman tavoitteita Strateginen/ toiminnallinen Tavoite Toimenpide Mittari, vastuuhenkilö tavoite Yleishallinto Elinvoimainen ja erottuva Kirkkonummi Markkinoimme kunnan matkailu- ja Kuntamarkkinoinnin kokonaissuunnitelma toteutunut/ei toteutunut luontokohteita yhteistyössä paikallisten valmistuu viimeistään huhtikuussa 2020. kuntakehityspäällikkö yrittäjien kanssa mm. kehittämällä sähköisiä markkinointialustoja Selvitetään kunnan virkistysverkosto (elinvoimaohjelma 6.1.), olemassa olevien selvitysten, suunnitelmien ja kehityskuvien pohjalta. Verkostosta viestitään aktiivisesti kuntalaisille. Sivistys- ja vapaa-aikapalvelujen Kuntalaisten hyvinvointia tukevat Virkistys- ja liikuntastrategian Valmistelu aloitetaan vuonna 2020 nuoriso- ja liikuntajohtaja toimiala, liikuntatoimi palvelut, edistämme kuntalaisten laatiminen hyvinvointia mm. kehittämällä vapaa- ajan paikkoja ja palveluita. Yhdyskuntatekniikan toimiala Yhdyskuntatekniikan lautakunta Elinvoimainen ja erottuva Kirkkonummi Panostamme kävelyn, pyöräilyn sekä joukkoliikenteen käyttäjämäärät;
    [Show full text]
  • I Suomenlahti – Finska Viken – Gulf of Finland
    TM/UfS/NtM 9-10/116-144/10.4.2010 1 I Suomenlahti – Finska viken – Gulf of Finland * 116 .(T) 15, 16 A/615/615_2 A/INDEX Suomi. �o�ii��. �o�ii����i�i��o�ii�� ������-väylä (2.� m). ������Väylän �i����i��� m������mi� ���. Fi�����. �o�i��. F�r����� �o�ii����i�i��o�i�� ( 2.� m). Ti��f���ig r��uc�ri�g av ����ju�gå����� i f�r�����. Fi�����. �o�ii��. �o�ii����i�i��o�ii�� ch����� (2.� m). M�ximum �u�hori��� �r�ugh� tem�or�ri�� r��uc��. Ajankohta: Toistaiseksi Tidpunkt: Tills vidare Time: Until further notice Väylä o� m��������u 1.8 m��rii� ��uraavi�� �istei��� väli��� � Leddju�gå����� r��uc�rat �i�� 1.8 m m����� fö�j���� �unkter – M�x. �u�hori��� �r�ugh� r��uc�� �o 1.8 m b��w��� �h� fo��owi�g �o�i�io��: WGS 84 60°26.7624’N 26°14.6624’E 60 27.1420 26 14.2391 (LV/TV/FTA, Helsinki/Helsingfors 2010) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *11�. 15, 951 A/611/611_3 A/GENERA� Suomi. Kotka. Pukasalm���i�mi-Lamm�����ri vener�i��i(1.2 m). Äyspäänselkä- Pukki���ri vener�i��i (1.2 m). Väyläli�j�u���� muu�o�. Turvalaitemuu�o����. K�r���m�r�i���� muu�o�. Fi�����. Kotka. Bå�rutten Pukasalm���i�mi-Lamm�����ri (1.2 m). Bå�rutten Äyspäänselkä-Pukki���ri (1.2 m). Ä��r�� f�r�����r�g�i�g. Ä��r�� u��rickni�g. Ä��r�� kar�m�rkeri�g. Fi�����. Kotka. Pukasalm���i�mi-Lamm�����ri �m��� cr�f� route (1.2 m).
    [Show full text]
  • SCENARIOS for MARITIME AREAS 2050 Preparation of Scenarios for the Future of Finnish Maritime Areas Introduction How to Read the Scenarios
    SCENARIOS FOR MARITIME AREAS 2050 Preparation of scenarios for the future of Finnish maritime areas Introduction How to read the scenarios Scenarios for the future of the maritime area The scenarios described here may seem more and their impact assesment were created or less likely for different people.The purpose for maritime spatial planning. The scenarios is not, however, to select one scenario above discuss the changes in the operating environ- others by placing the scenarios in an or- ment of the maritime area as well as the needs der of likelihood or preference. Instead, the and views of interest groups regarding the fu- overall picture formed by the scenarios should ture development of the Finnish maritime area. be viewed. The events taking place in the future The assessment concerns, in particular, energy, are often a combination of different scenarios. maritime transport, environment, fishing and aquaculture, cultural heritage, tourism and rec- reational use, defence, marine industries, bio- technology and mineral extraction industries. In this document, the descriptions of mari- time areas presented in the scenarios as well as the risks and opportunities are a compila- tion of materials of the workshops organised The scenarios presented here are descrip- in spring 2019. The work has been commis- tions of the possible and alternative futures sioned by the Ministry of the Environment. of the operating environment in Finnish maritime areas until 2050. They are not an attempt to predict the future; instead, they are intended for the development of thinking and perspectives. The scenarios guide towards varied and consistent thinking over some alter- native future options and thereby enhance the conditions for interpreting and understanding current phenomena and enhancing the plan- ning of operations and the ability to respond.
    [Show full text]
  • FINLAND POLICE/AMBULANCE/FIRE: Police Tel: 112; Ambulance Tel: 112; Fire Finland Tel: 112
    FINLAND POLICE/AMBULANCE/FIRE: Police Tel: 112; Ambulance Tel: 112; Fire Finland Tel: 112. TELEPHONES: Not available. SHORE LEAVE: Shore leave allowed for crew members. GENERAL: (See Plan) IDENTIFICATION CARDS: Not needed. GARBAGE DISPOSAL: Available at 2 hours notice. GEO-POLITICAL: WASTE OIL DISPOSAL: Available. Capital City: Helsinki. SEAMAN’S CLUBS: None. Nationality: Finnish. GENERAL: Supplies: Ship stores and provisions can be ordered from Population: 5,200,000. Hango through Agent. COMMUNICATIONS: AUTHORITY: Hamnkontoret i Ekenas, Postbox 75, FIN-10601 International Direct Dial Code: 358. Ekenas, Finland. Tel: ␣358 (192) 632157, GSM: ␣358 (40) 589-0922. Number of Internal Airports: 69. FAX: ␣358 (192) 632050. Contact: Svante Rosin, Harbour Master. Major Languages Spoken: Finnish, Swedish. ECONOMY: Currency: 1 Euro (EUR) of 100 Cents. HAMINA: 60.34 N. 27.11 E. (See Plan) Exchange: (as of July 2002) US$ 1.00 ␦ EUR 1.02 LOCATION: Hamina is on the S.E. coast of Finland, approximately EUR 1.00 ␦ US$ 0.98 75 nautical miles East of Helsinki and 19.5 nautical miles from the Main Industries: Metal products; shipbuilding; pulp and paper; copper Finnish/Russian border. refining; foodstuffs; chemicals; textiles and clothing. Charts: B.A. Charts No. 503 and 2393. ENVIRONMENT: B.A. Pilot NP20. Territorial Sea: 12 n.m. Finnish Charts No. 14, 134 and 902. Other Maritime Claims: Continental Shelf: 200 m. PORT LIMITS: A vessel is considered to be an ‘‘arrived vessel’’ subject Exclusive Fishing Zone: 12 n.m. Contiguous Zone: 6 n.m. to Charter Party Terms, when arrived at roads. Coastline Extent: 1,126 km. DOCUMENTS: Normally required: Climate: Cold temperate; potentially sub-arctic, but comparatively mild 1 Crew List.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Plan to Implement the Key Projects and Reforms of the Strategic Government Programme for 2015–2019, Update 2016
    Action plan to implement the key projects and reforms of the Strategic Government Programme for 2015–2019, update 2016 Government Publications 12/2016 Action plan to implement the key projects and reforms of the Strategic Government Programme for 2015–2019,update 2016 Government Publications 12/2016 Published by DESCRIPTION PRIME MINISTER’S OFFICE October 2016 Authors Type of publication Report Commissioned by Prime Minister’s Office Date of appointment Title Action plan to implement the key projects and reforms of the Strategic Government Programme for 2015–2019,update 2016 Abstract The Government action plan is a programme of restructuring. The action plan is an elaboration of the ways and means for achieving the key objectives detailed in the Government Programme. The Government is fully committed to its implementation. This is the Government’s second, revised action plan. Several new schemes have been launched in the area of employment and competitiveness in an effort to create the necessary preconditions for business growth and job creation, particularly in the SME sector. The main milestones, supportive actions and financing of the key projects and reforms are defined in more detail in the Government’s action plan. In the autumn of 2015, the Government decided to make a one‐off appropriation of EUR 1 billion for these key projects in the General Government Fiscal Plan for 2016–2018. This Government action plan will be implemented within the framework of said funding, the existing authorised spending limits and the other provisions of the General Government Fiscal Plan. The action plan for the implementation of the key projects and reforms defined in the Strategic Government Programme involves a large number of extensive operational changes designed to reform Finnish society and underpin the efforts to create favourable conditions for economic growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Tm/Ufs/Ntm 20.6.2010 17 254 - 269 1
    Tm/UfS/NtM 20.6.2010 17 254 - 269 1 I Suomenlahti – Finska viken – Gulf of Finland 254. (T) 952 EST. 507 (INT 1267), 610 Viro. Suomenlahti. Uusmadal. Siirretty keltainen valopoiju. Estland. Finska viken. Uusmadal. Flyttad gul lysboj. Estonia. Gulf of Finland. Uusmadal. Yellow lighted buoy moved. Ref: TM/UfS/NtM 13/188/2010 (T) kumotaan/utgår/cancelled Siirrä – Flytta – Move: Poiju Erikoismerkki WGS 84 Boj Specialmärke Fl Y 5s Paikasta/Från/From Paikkaan/Till/To Buoy Special Mark 59°41.20’N 59°41.05’N 24°37.70’E 24°37.41’E (NtM 6/98 (T), Tallinn 2010) ________________________________________________________________________ * 255. 19 B/630 Suomi. Kirkkonummi. Kantvikin väylä (10.0/9,2 m). Poistetut erikoismerkit. Pois- tettu viitta. Karttamerkinnän muutos. Finland. Kyrkslätt. Kantviksleden (10.0/9,2 m). Indragna specialmärken. Indra- gen prick. Ändrad kartmarkering. Finland. Kirkkonummi. Kantvik channel (10.0/9,2 m). Discontinued special marks. Discontinued spar buoy. Amend chart. A. Poistetut valaisemattomat erikoismerkit – Indragna obelysta specialmärken – Withdrawn unlighted special marks (INT Q 130.6). Poista – Stryk – Delete: Nr WGS 84 1) Poiju/Boj/Buoy 12800 60º04.7244’N 24º22.2014’E 2) ” 12802 60 04.6746 24 21.9878 2 3) ” 12805 60 04.8125 24 21.8711 4) ” 12807 60 04.8782 24 22.0726 B. Poistettu valaisematon viitta – Indragen obelyst prick – Discontinued unlighted spar buoy Poista – Stryk – Delete: Nr WGS 84 12280 Oikea 60°04.8880’N 24°22.3862’E SB Starboard (LV/TV/FTA, Helsinki/Helsingfors 2010) ________________________________________________________________________ II Saaristomeri ja Ahvenanmeri Skärgårdshavet och Ålands hav Archipelago Sea and Sea of Åland * 256 26, 190, 190_A D/706/706_1 Suomi.
    [Show full text]
  • Siuntion Kunta Pikkala-Marsudden Osayleiskaava 2040
    SIUNTION KUNTA PIKKALA-MARSUDDEN OSAYLEISKAAVA 2040 SELOSTUS TYÖNUMERO 20602385 11.11.2019 Sweco Ympäristö Oy 20 - 09 Sweco Ympäristö Oy Y -tunnus 0564810 - 5 - PL 88, 00521 Helsinki www.sweco.fi Sanukka Lehtiö Mäkelininkatu 17 A, 90100 Oulu [email protected] Kaavoitusarkkitehti, YKS-446 PL 453, 33101 Tampere puh. 010 2414 000 Maankäyttö Uudenmaankatu 19 A, 20701 Turku repo002.dot 2013 repo002.dot Selostus_Siuntio_Pikkala_Marsudden_OYK_ehdotus.docx Sisältö 1 JOHDANTO .................................................................................................................... 1 2 PERUSTIEDOT............................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Suunnittelualue ............................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Selvitykset ................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2.1 Aikaisemmin laaditut selvitykset ................................................................................................................................ 2 2.2.2 Yleiskaavatyön yhteydessä laaditut selvitykset ........................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Suunnittelutilanne......................................................................................................................... 4 2.3.1 Maakuntakaavoitus ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]