DOCSLIB.ORG

Railway Tunnel Between Finland and Estonia Finest Bay Area Development Oy Finest Bay Area - Railway Tunnel Between Finland and Estonia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Railway Tunnel Between Finland and Estonia Finest Bay Area Development Oy Finest Bay Area - Railway Tunnel Between Finland and Estonia DECEMBER 2018 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME Railway tunnel between Finland and Estonia Finest Bay Area Development Oy Finest Bay Area - Railway tunnel between Finland and Estonia Copyright © Pöyry Finland Oy ISBN 978-952-94-1576-2 (printed) ISBN 978-952-94-1577-9 (PDF) All rights reserved. This document, or any part thereof, may not be copied or duplicated in any form without written permission from Pöyry Finland Oy. Pro- ject number 101009314. Cover photo: A-Insinöörit Oy 2 CONTACT INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY FOR PUBLIC VIEWING Project Developer: Finest Bay Area Development Oy The assessment programme is available in electronic Kustaa Valtonen format at the following addresses: [email protected] www.ymparisto.fi/FinestBayAreaTallinnatunneliYVA Tel. +358 504155300 www.miljo.fi/FinestBayAreaTallinntunnelMKB https://www.finestbayarea.online/ In addition to the assessment programme, the web- Finnish liaison authority for the EIA process: site contains information on the project, such as the Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the places where the assessment is available for public Environment in Uusimaa viewing and the time and place for the public infor- Contact person Leena Eerola mation event. [email protected] Tel. +358 295 021 380 The project’s assessment programme for Estonia is www.ely-keskus.fi/uusimaa available in English at: www.ymparisto.fi/FinestBayAreaTallinnatunneliYVA/ Estonian liaison authority for the EIA process: https://finestbayarea.online/about Ministry of Environment Contact person Rainer Persidski Tel. +372 626 2973 [email protected] EIA consultant: Pöyry Finland Oy EIA project manager Karoliina Jaatinen [email protected] Tel. +358 40 660 4407 www.poyry.fi Publisher: Finest Bay Area Development Oy Layout: Ed Publishing&Marketing/Stil&form Maps used in the figures: Base maps from the National Land Survey of Finland, open data 2018, unless stated otherwise. 3 Finest Bay Area Development Oy Finest Bay Area - Railway tunnel between Finland and Estonia TABLE OF CONTENTS Contact Information And Availability For Public Viewing . .3 Table Of Contents ..............................................................................4 Summary .....................................................................................9 EIA Workgroup ................................................................................25 Terms And Abbreviations. 28 1 Introduction ...............................................................................30 2 Project Description And Alternatives Being Considered . .32 2.1 Project Developer and background and purpose of the project .......................................................................32 2.2 Project location and alternatives being considered ..........................................................................................32 2.2.1 Project scope ........................................................................................................................................32 2.2.2 Project alternatives in Finland (ALT1a, ALT1b and ALT2) .....................................................................32 2.2.3 Zero alternative in Finland (ALT0+) .......................................................................................................35 2.3 Project design stage and schedule ...................................................................................................................36 2.3.1 Finland ..................................................................................................................................................36 2.3.2 Estonia ..................................................................................................................................................36 2.4 Interfaces with other projects ...........................................................................................................................37 3 EIA procedure .............................................................................38 3.1 International EIA procedure ..............................................................................................................................38 3.1.1 Espoo Convention ................................................................................................................................38 3.1.2 Bilateral agreement between Estonia and Finland ...............................................................................38 3.2 EIA procedure in Finland ...................................................................................................................................40 3.2.1 Goal and contents of the EIA procedure ..............................................................................................40 3.2.2 Need for an EIA procedure ...................................................................................................................43 3.2.3 Parties to the EIA procedure.................................................................................................................44 3.2.4 Participation, interaction and communication ......................................................................................45 3.3 EIA procedure in Estonia ...................................................................................................................................47 3.4 Zoning procedure ..............................................................................................................................................51 3.4.1 Zoning procedure in Finland .................................................................................................................51 3.4.2 Zoning procedure in Estonia ................................................................................................................51 4 3.5 Consolidation of the different procedures in Finland and Estonia ....................................................................52 3.5.1 Zoning and strategic EIA ......................................................................................................................55 3.5.2 EIA procedure .......................................................................................................................................55 4 Technical description. 56 4.1 Tunnel routes .....................................................................................................................................................56 4.1.1 Railway tunnels .....................................................................................................................................56 4.1.2 Station solutions ...................................................................................................................................58 4.1.3 Gauge ...................................................................................................................................................59 4.1.4 Rescue safety .......................................................................................................................................59 4.2 Design basis ......................................................................................................................................................61 4.2.1 Track design .........................................................................................................................................61 4.2.2 Description of the TBM method ...........................................................................................................61 4.3 Preparatory work...............................................................................................................................................63 4.3.1 Removal of unexploded ordnances ......................................................................................................63 4.3.2 Tunnel excavation ................................................................................................................................63 4.4 Project logistics .................................................................................................................................................64 4.5 Track construction ............................................................................................................................................68 4.6 Utilisation of crushed stone ..............................................................................................................................68 4.7 Artificial island ...................................................................................................................................................69 4.7.1 Preliminary analysis for the location of the artificial island ...................................................................69 4.7.2 Construction of the artificial island .......................................................................................................71 4.8 Waste generated during construction ...............................................................................................................73 4.9 Infrastructure crossings ....................................................................................................................................73 4.10 Commissioning .................................................................................................................................................74 4.11 Reference projects ............................................................................................................................................74
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Case Helsinki Airport Expansion: the Benefits of Using Open Infrabim Workflow and Technologies BIM World Munchen 2019 - 26.11.2019
    Case Helsinki Airport Expansion: The Benefits of Using Open InfraBIM Workflow and Technologies BIM World Munchen 2019 - 26.11.2019 Ilkka Tieaho, Infrakit Ltd Jarkko Männistö, Sitowise Ltd Petteri Palviainen, Novatron Ltd Lauri Hartikainen, Pointscene Ltd 4 EXPERTISE • Digital twins and map services • Visualizations and visualization strategies • BIM, GIS, City information models • Information management • Digital engineering • City planning and architecture • Point clouds and photogrammetric models • VR, AR, XR • Interaction and communication PROJECTS • Raide-Jokeri light rail • Grown Bridges tram line JARKKO MÄNNISTÖ • Port of Oulu • Helsinki Airport BIM MANAGER • Science Park, Turku • Travel center, Tampere AURA, SERVICE MANAGER • Tammela District, Tampere • Verkkosaari District, Helsinki ARCHITECT • Central-Pasila, Helsinki SITOWISE 2013 - • Lahti Bypass 5 We are Building a Sustainable and Smart Living Environment. Infrastructure Building Design and Consultancy Design and Consultancy Services Services Our expertise covers the entire Building and infrastructure life cycle Project Smart City Management Services Background ✓ 2003-2004: Ground Investigations and Surveying, Espoo City ✓ 2005-2006: Junior Project Engineer, (Infra projects), Ramboll ✓ 2006-2013: Junior Designer and Designer (Infra), Sitowise ✓ 2013-2016: Development Manager (BIM), Sitowise ✓ 2016-2019: Head Of Development (BIM), Sitowise ✓ 2019: Vice President, BIM Services, Infrakit ✓ +10 years: Responsible for Implementation and development of BIM-workflows in Design and
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Cultural Heritage Into Maritime Spatial Planning in the BSR
    Integrating Cultural Heritage into Maritime Spatial Planning in the BSR Final publication of the Baltic Sea Region Integrated Maritime Cultural Heritage Management Project 2017-2020 Integrating cultural heritage into maritime spatial planning in the BSR Final publication of the Baltic Sea Region Integrated Maritime Cultural Heritage Management Project (BalticRIM) 2017-2020 Editors: Marianne Lehtimäki, Sallamaria Tikkanen and Riikka Tevali, Finnish Heritage Agency Authors in bold and contributors: Susanne Altvater, Robert Aps, Leyla Bashirova, Nerijus Blazauskas, Larisa Danilova, Kristjan Herkl, Krista Karro, Krzysztof Kurzyk, Liisi Lees, Marianne Lehtimäki, Paweł Litwinienko, Matthias Maluck, Magdalena Matczak, Joanna Pardus, Iwona Pomian, Janusz Rżycki, Mailis Roio, Lise Schrøder, Laura Seesmeri, Łukasz Szydłowski, Riikka Tevali, Sallamaria Tikkanen, Jakub Turski, Joanna Witkowska, Kamila Zalesiak, Jacek Zaucha, Vladas Zulkus, Daniel Zwick. Layout and graphic design: Mainostoimisto KMG Turku Cover photo: Wreck of Korpostrm Alf, Parainen, Finland. Photo: Maija Huttunen Contact persons for the BalticRIM project: Matthias Maluck, Lead Partner State Archaeology Department of Schleswig-Holstein and Coordinator Susanne Altvater, s.Pro Contact person for cultural heritage: Sallamaria Tikkanen, Finnish Heritage Agency Contact person for MSP: Jacek Zaucha, University of Gdańsk Contact person for BalticRIM Data Portal: Lise Schrder, Aalborg University Disclaimer: The publication is a result of the project “BalticRIM– Baltic Sea Region Integrated Maritime Cultural Heritage Management” (2017–2020). Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund). Report content is the sole responsibility of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Foreword Water connects us, and culture unites. This Council coastal cultural heritage combined their expertise of Baltic Sea States’ motto can be applied as an with the Submariner Network for Blue Growth overall theme for the BalticRIM approach, too.
    [Show full text]
  • Review and Meta-Analysis of the Environmental Biology and Potential Invasiveness of a Poorly-Studied Cyprinid, the Ide Leuciscus Idus
    REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE & AQUACULTURE https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2020.1822280 REVIEW Review and Meta-Analysis of the Environmental Biology and Potential Invasiveness of a Poorly-Studied Cyprinid, the Ide Leuciscus idus Mehis Rohtlaa,b, Lorenzo Vilizzic, Vladimır Kovacd, David Almeidae, Bernice Brewsterf, J. Robert Brittong, Łukasz Głowackic, Michael J. Godardh,i, Ruth Kirkf, Sarah Nienhuisj, Karin H. Olssonh,k, Jan Simonsenl, Michał E. Skora m, Saulius Stakenas_ n, Ali Serhan Tarkanc,o, Nildeniz Topo, Hugo Verreyckenp, Grzegorz ZieRbac, and Gordon H. Coppc,h,q aEstonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia; bInstitute of Marine Research, Austevoll Research Station, Storebø, Norway; cDepartment of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Łod z, Poland; dDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia; eDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, USP-CEU University, Madrid, Spain; fMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, Kingston-upon-Thames, Surrey, UK; gDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Dorset, UK; hCentre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK; iAECOM, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada; jOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada; kDepartment of Zoology, Tel Aviv University and Inter-University Institute for Marine Sciences in Eilat, Tel Aviv,
    [Show full text]
  • Otaniemen Vesitorni
    Rakennushistoriaselvitys Otaniemen vesitorni Otaniemi 2017 Tilaaja Senaatti-kiinteistöt Tilaajan edustaja ja ohjausryhmä Emmi Sihvonen, Senaatti-kiinteistöt, kiinteistökehityspäällikkö Elisa El Harouny, Museovirasto, intendentti Sirkkaliisa Jetsonen, Museovirasto, yliarkkitehti Robin Landsdorff, Museovirasto, intendentti Konsultti Arkkitehtitoimisto ark-byroo Oy Kustaankatu 3, 00500 Helsinki [email protected] www.arkbyroo.fi 010 2350 566 Työryhmä Marianna Heikinheimo, projektijohtaja Kerttu Loukusa Noora Laak Christian Anttonen, graafikko Sami Heikinheimo, valokuvaus Etukannen kuva Sami Heikinheimo Suoritusajankohta Syyskuu–marraskuu 2017. Työ on luovutettu 1.12.2017. © Arkkitehtitoimisto ark-byroo ISBN 978-952-7239-32-2 (nide) ISBN 978-952-7239-33-9 (.pdf) Asiasanat Otaniemen vesitorni, huippulämpökeskus, arkkitehtitoimisto Alvar Aalto, 1970-luku, Espoon vesilaitos, HSY, rakennushistoriaselvitys, rakennushallitus, Otaniemen hoitokunta, modernismi Sisällys 1. Johdanto ....................................................4 1.1 Kohde ....................................................4 1.2 Tehtävä ..................................................8 1.3 Perustiedot ...............................................9 2. Otaniemen kampusalue ja vesihuolto ............................. 11 3. Vesitorni rakennetaan .........................................14 3.1 Suunnittelijat ............................................. 14 3.2 Rakentaminen .............................................17 3.3 Suunnitteluratkaisu ........................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Building for Life
    SRV – Building for life Capital Markets Day, SRV Group Plc 23 May 2018 Juha Pekka Ojala, CEO @JpOjala Agenda SRV in brief Megatrends and market overview Strategy and Future SRV Projects 2 SRV IN BRIEF SRV at a glance Selected key figures (MEUR) . Finnish construction company, founded in 1987, publicly listed since 2007 . Both builder and increasingly a real estate developer (more capital Q1/2018 2017 2016 intensive) Revenues 215.7 1,116.1 884.1 . Mostly family/founder-owned, over 50% EBITDA -7.9 22.8 34.3 . Employs about 1,100 people, of which about 1/3 are shareholders Operative Operating -5.1 28.7 26.3 . SRV is responsible for the implementation of approximately 70 profit 1) construction projects and near future development projects in Finland, Operating profit -8.8 17.1 27.7 order backlog in total over EUR 1.5 billion (31.12.2017) Order backlog 2) 1,653.0 1,547.9 1,758.5 . Operates in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area as well as in other attractive Equity ratio % 3) 32.5 35.5 38.3 growth centres in Finland Net debt 355.4 297.6 246.3 . Over 30 years history in operations in Russia and Estonia Balance sheet total 927.7 888.5 882.5 Operations in Finland Housing construction Business 34 % premises construction 66 % Revenue split 2017 1) Operative Operating profit is determined by deducting the calculated exchange difference included in financial items in Russian operations and their potential hedging impacts from operating profit. 2) The number corresponds to the last available day of the period 4 3) Equity ratio = (total equity / (total assets – advances received)) x 100% Operating Regions Russia: Moscow and St.
    [Show full text]
  • FP7-285556 Safecity Project Deliverable D2.5 Helsinki Public Safety Scenario
    FP7‐285556 SafeCity Project Deliverable D2.5 Helsinki Public Safety Scenario Deliverable Type: CO Nature of the Deliverable: R Date: 30.09.2011 Distribution: WP2 Editors: VTT Contributors: VTT, ISDEFE *Deliverable Type: PU= Public, RE= Restricted to a group specified by the Consortium, PP= Restricted to other program participants (including the Commission services), CO= Confidential, only for members of the Consortium (including the Commission services) ** Nature of the Deliverable: P= Prototype, R= Report, S= Specification, T= Tool, O= Other Abstract: This document is an analysis of Helsinki’s public safety characters. It describes the critical infrastructure of Helsinki, discuss its current limitations, and give ideas for the future. D2.5 – HELSINKI PUBLIC SAFETY SCENARIO PROJECT Nº FP7‐ 285556 DISCLAIMER The work associated with this report has been carried out in accordance with the highest technical standards and SafeCity partners have endeavored to achieve the degree of accuracy and reliability appropriate to the work in question. However since the partners have no control over the use to which the information contained within the report is to be put by any other party, any other such party shall be deemed to have satisfied itself as to the suitability and reliability of the information in relation to any particular use, purpose or application. Under no circumstances will any of the partners, their servants, employees or agents accept any liability whatsoever arising out of any error or inaccuracy contained in this report (or any further consolidation, summary, publication or dissemination of the information contained within this report) and/or the connected work and disclaim all liability for any loss, damage, expenses, claims or infringement of third party rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Fish Edna Metabarcoding: Field Replicates Disproportionately Improve the Detection of Stream Associated Vertebrate Specie
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.26.437227; this version posted March 26, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 2 3 Beyond fish eDNA metabarcoding: Field replicates 4 disproportionately improve the detection of stream 5 associated vertebrate species 6 7 8 9 Till-Hendrik Macher1, Robin Schütz1, Jens Arle2, Arne J. Beermann1,3, Jan 10 Koschorreck2, Florian Leese1,3 11 12 13 1 University of Duisburg-Essen, Aquatic Ecosystem Research, Universitätsstr. 5, 45141 Essen, 14 Germany 15 2German Environmental Agency, Wörlitzer Platz 1, 06844 Dessau-Roßlau, Germany 16 3University of Duisburg-Essen, Centre for Water and Environmental Research (ZWU), Universitätsstr. 17 3, 45141 Essen, Germany 18 19 20 21 22 Keywords: birds, biomonitoring, bycatch, conservation, environmental DNA, mammals 23 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.26.437227; this version posted March 26, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 24 Abstract 25 Fast, reliable, and comprehensive biodiversity monitoring data are needed for 26 environmental decision making and management. Recent work on fish environmental 27 DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding shows that aquatic diversity can be captured fast, reliably, 28 and non-invasively at moderate costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Otsikko, Normaali Arial + 24 Pt, Lihavoitu
    Liitosalueen pienkalustolinjojen suunnitelma SUY C: 1/2009 WSP Finland Julkaisija KUVAILULEHTI Helsingin kaupungin liikennelaitos Liikelaitos Julkaisun päivämäärä Suunnitteluyksikkö 30.12.2008 Tekijä(t) Simo Airaksinen (WSP), Johanna Wallin (WSP), Ville Lepistö (HKL), Markku Gran- holm (HKL) Julkaisun nimi Liitosalueen pienkalustolinjojen suunnitelma Tiivistelmä Helsinki laajenee vuoden 2009 alussa itään Östersundomin ja Västerkullan alueille. Samalla liitosalue siirtyy YTV:n lippujärjestelmän piiriin. Joukkoliikenne liitosalueelle hoidetaan ensimmäisessä vaiheessa pääasiassa U-linjoilla, joita täydennetään alu- een sisäisillä pienkalustolinjoilla. Osa pienkalustolinjojen vuoroista jatkaa Itäkeskuk- seen. U-linjoja ovat 830 Kampista Landbon kautta Kalkkirantaan, 835 Kampista Nik- kilään ja 840 Kampista Porvoon suuntaan. Tässä raportissa esitetään pienkalustolinjojen suunnitelma reitteineen ja aikataului- neen, sekä taustatiedoksi U-linjojen aikatauluja, väestötietoja ja infratarkasteluja. Suunnitelman lähtökohtana ovat U-linjojen ja väestötietojen lisäksi muun muassa koulumatkatarpeet. Pienkalustolinjat toimivat suunnitelman mukaan syöttölinjoina U- linjoille. Pienkalustolinjoja ovat linjat 91 ja 93. Linja 91 on suunniteltu koulumatkayh- teyksiä varten Länsisalmesta Sakarinmäen kautta Landbohon. K-lähdöt ajetaan Ta- losaaren ja Kappelin kautta. Linja 93 liikennöi Landbohon, K-lähdöt Karhusaaren kautta Landbohon ja V-lähdöt Karhusaareen. A-lähdöt ajetaan Itäkeskukseen. Liitosalueen tärkeimmät kohteet ovat Landbon ja Karhusaaren asuinalueet,
    [Show full text]
  • THE HYDROBIOTOPIC DIVERSITY of the LAKES of the LOWER PRUT RIVER, REPUBLIC of MOLDOVA Mihaela MUNTEANU (PILA)1, Silvius STANCIU
    THE HYDROBIOTOPIC DIVERSITY OF THE LAKES OF THE LOWER PRUT RIVER, REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA Mihaela MUNTEANU (PILA)1, Silvius STANCIU2 1PhD Student, „Dunărea de Jos” University of Galați, Romania, email: [email protected]. 2 PhD Professor „Dunărea de Jos”University of Galați, Romania, email: [email protected] Abstract This paper proposes the presentation and analysis of the fish fauna and the specific benthic resources of the Prut River and its tributaries: Costeşti-Stânca, Beleu, Manta. An important objective of the paper is to present the differences in hydrobiotop diversity in different riparian sectors. A healthy ecosystem has a rich ichthyofauna due to the diversity of vegetation and fish species capable of withstanding resistance to aggressive external factors and threats. The aquatic biodiversity of the Prut River is a major complex consisting of phytoplankton and zooplankton. To optimize production of fish, an important factor is maintaining the balance quantity and quality of the entire water system. From this point of view, the paper presented also quantitative aspects of zoobenthos, which is different in the analyzed areas, being influenced by the degree of pollution, the hydrological regime or the physico-chemical conditions. Research has revealed significant differences between different areas of the aquatic fauna of the Prut, mainly due to the human factor. The study is a preliminary one, preparing a broader analysis of the impact of the human factor in the aquatic areas of the Republic of Moldova. Identifying and analyzing the factors that have led to the modification of aquatic structure and diversity can serve as arguments for achieving viable measures for the protection and sustainable use of natural aquatic resources at national level.
    [Show full text]
  • All Clubs Missing Officers 2014-15.Pdf
    Run Date: 12/17/2015 8:40:39AM Lions Clubs International Clubs Missing Club Officer for 2014-2015(Only President, Secretary or Treasurer) Undistricted Club Club Name Title (Missing) 27947 MALTA HOST Treasurer 27952 MONACO DOYEN Membershi 30809 NEW CALEDONIA NORTH Membershi 34968 SAN ESTEVAN Membershi 35917 BAHRAIN LC Membershi 35918 PORT VILA Membershi 35918 PORT VILA President 35918 PORT VILA Secretary 35918 PORT VILA Treasurer 41793 MANILA NEW SOCIETY Membershi 43038 MANILA MAYNILA LINGKOD BAYAN Membershi 43193 ST PAULS BAY Membershi 44697 ANDORRA DE VELLA Membershi 44697 ANDORRA DE VELLA President 44697 ANDORRA DE VELLA Secretary 44697 ANDORRA DE VELLA Treasurer 47478 DUMBEA Membershi 53760 LIEPAJA Membershi 54276 BOURAIL LES ORCHIDEES Membershi 54276 BOURAIL LES ORCHIDEES President 54276 BOURAIL LES ORCHIDEES Secretary 54276 BOURAIL LES ORCHIDEES Treasurer 54912 ULAANBAATAR CENTRAL Membershi 55216 MDINA Membershi 55216 MDINA President 55216 MDINA Secretary 55216 MDINA Treasurer 56581 RIFFA Secretary OFF0021 © Copyright 2015, Lions Clubs International, All Rights Reserved. Page 1 of 1290 Run Date: 12/17/2015 8:40:39AM Lions Clubs International Clubs Missing Club Officer for 2014-2015(Only President, Secretary or Treasurer) Undistricted Club Club Name Title (Missing) 57293 RIGA RIGAS LIEPA Membershi 57293 RIGA RIGAS LIEPA President 57293 RIGA RIGAS LIEPA Secretary 57293 RIGA RIGAS LIEPA Treasurer 57378 MINSK CENTRAL Membershi 57378 MINSK CENTRAL President 57378 MINSK CENTRAL Secretary 57378 MINSK CENTRAL Treasurer 59850 DONETSK UNIVERSAL
    [Show full text]
  • Helsinki Alueittain 2015 Helsingfors Områdesvis Helsinki by District
    Helsingfors stads faktacentral City of Helsinki Urban Facts HELSINKI ALUEITTAIN Helsingfors områdesvis 2015 Helsinki by District Helsingin kaupungin tietokeskus PL 5500, 00099 Helsingin kaupunki, p. 09 310 1612 Helsingfors stads faktacentral PB 5500, 00099 Helsingfors stad, tel. 09 310 1612 City of Helsinki Urban Facts P.O.Box 5500, FI-00099 City of Helsinki, tel. +358 9 310 1612 www.hel.fi/tietokeskus Tilaukset / jakelu p. 09 310 36293 Käteismyynti Tietokeskuksen kirjasto, Siltasaarenk. 18-20 A Beställningar / distribution tel. 09 310 36293 Direktförsäljning Faktacentralens bibliotek, Broholmsgatan 18-20 A Orders / distribution tel. +358 9 310 36293 Direct sales Library, Siltasaarenkatu 18-20 A S-posti / e-mail [email protected] HELSINKI ALUEITTAIN Helsingfors områdesvis 2015 Helsinki by District Helsingin kaupungin tietokeskus Helsingfors stads faktacentral Helsinki City of Helsinki Urban Facts Helsingfors 2016 Julkaisun toimitus Tea Tikkanen Redigering Editors Käännökset Magnus Gräsbeck Översättningar Translations Taitto Petri Berglund Ombrytning General layout Kansi Tarja Sundström-Alku Pärm Cover Tekninen toteutus Otto Burman Tekniskt utförande Tea Tikkanen Technical Editing Pekka Vuori Valokuvat Kansi - Pärm - Cover: Helsingin kaupungin matkailu- ja kongressitoimiston Foton materiaalipankki / Lauri Rotko, Visit Helsinki / Jussi Hellsten Photos Helsingin kaupungin tietokeskus / Raimo Riski Kartat Pohja-aineistot: Kartor © Helsingin kaupunkimittausosasto, alueen kunnat ja HSY, 2014 Maps © Liikennevirasto / Digiroad 2014
    [Show full text]
  • Katri Vuola WOOD SPECIES and the QUESTION of ORIGIN
    75 Katri Vuola WOOD SPECIES AND THE QUESTION OF ORIGIN: REASSESSING THE SCULPTURE PRODUCTION IN THE DIOCESE OF TURKU (ÅBO) DURING THE 14TH CENTURY It was oak that was preferred abroad, sometimes limewood, for such carvings. In the Nordic countries birch and other of our common wood species were used for this, yet, in the old account books one can also find remarks on the imports of wood during the 15th and 16th centuries, possibly for the material of the artworks, for the most part possibly mainly for the chairs and chests in the castles as well as bishops’ seats and choir screens, e.g. for the needs of the churches.1 This short outline of the wood use in medieval ecclesiastical sculpture and church furnishing is included in Emil Nervander’s (1840–1914) essay on church art in Finland, published in a series of Kansanvalistusseuran toimituksia (1887), a journal aimed for the education of the public. In addition to being a writer, Nervander was the planner, and on some occasions also the leader of art historical DOI: https://doi.org/10.12697/BJAH.2019.18.02 1 Emil Nervander, Kirkollisesta taiteesta Suomessa keskiaikana. Ensimmäinen vihko. Kansanvalistusseuran toimituksia LXXIII (Helsinki, 1887), 27. The translation of the citation from Swedish into English is by the author. 76 K ATR I VUOLA WOOD SPECIES AND THE QUESTION OF ORIGIN 77 excursions to rural churches in Finland, organized by The Finnish Eastern part of the Swedish kingdom in the Middle Ages. I will do Antiquarian Society from the 1870s to the early 1900s.
    [Show full text]