MAG Regional Commuter Rail System Study Update Final Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MAG Regional Commuter Rail System Study Update Final Report 2018 REGIONAL COMMUTER RAIL SYSTEM STUDY UPDATE Maricopa Association of Governments | May 2018 MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS REGIONAL COMMUTER RAIL SYSTEM STUDY UPDATE May 2018 Page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents ES Executive Summary ................................................................................................ ES-1 1.0 Study Overview ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Background ........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Purpose of the System Study ................................................................................ 1-2 1.4 Need for a Commuter Rail System ........................................................................ 1-2 1.5 Potential Benefits and Goals of Commuter Rail ..................................................... 1-5 1.6 System Study Update Process .............................................................................. 1-6 1.7 Organization of the System Study Update ............................................................. 1-6 2.0 Existing and Future Conditions ................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Introduction and Methodology ................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 New Information Included in Update ...................................................................... 2-5 2.3 Major Changes Since the 2010 Study .................................................................... 2-8 2.4 Summary of Findings ........................................................................................... 2-11 2.5 Grand Line Corridor ............................................................................................. 2-13 2.6 Estrella Line Corridor ........................................................................................... 2-37 2.7 San Tan Line Corridor ......................................................................................... 2-61 2.8 Kyrene Line Corridor ............................................................................................ 2-87 2.9 Future Extensions .............................................................................................. 2-110 3.0 Development of the Commuter Rail Program .......................................................... 3-1 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Development of Commuter Rail Corridors ............................................................. 3-1 3.3 Description of Proposed Commuter Rail System ................................................. 3-13 3.4 Commuter Rail Operations .................................................................................. 3-13 3.5 Summary of Commuter Rail System Assumptions ............................................... 3-14 3.6 Ridership Forecasting Results ............................................................................. 3-15 3.7 Cost Estimates .................................................................................................... 3-20 4.0 Recommendations and Implementation Strategy ................................................... 4-1 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 4-1 4.2 Peer City Comparison ............................................................................................ 4-1 4.3 Phasing Recommendations ................................................................................... 4-5 4.4 Integration with other Transit Modes ...................................................................... 4-5 i 4.5 Siting of Layover and Maintenance Facilities ......................................................... 4-8 4.6 Operations Models ............................................................................................... 4-12 4.7 Governance Options ............................................................................................ 4-16 4.8 Funding Options .................................................................................................. 4-22 4.9 Liability, Insurance, and Indemnification .............................................................. 4-35 4.10 Implementation Steps .......................................................................................... 4-43 5.0 References ................................................................................................................. 5-1 Appendix A: Methodology for Cost Estimating Appendix B: Evaluation of Potential Commuter Rail Corridor Extensions Appendix C: System Study Station Target Area Evaluation Appendix D: Commuter Rail Design Concepts Appendix E: Railroad Conditions and Issues Appendix F: Commuter Rail Vehicle Technology Appendix G: Commuter Rail Operations Plan Appendix H: Commuter Rail Maintenance Facility Description and Evaluation Appendix I: Commuter Rail Governance and Operating Structures Appendix J: Conceptual Memorandum of Understanding Appendix K: Insurance and Indemnity Language Appendix L: Potential Grade Separation Locations Appendix M: One-on-One Meetings with Participating Jurisdictions Appendix N: BNSF Operations Report (Included Separately) ii List of Figures Figure 1-1: MAG Regional Commuter Rail System Corridors _________________________ 1-4 Figure 1-2: Commuter Rail Train Examples _______________________________________ 1-5 Figure 2-1: Arizona Passenger Rail Corridor Study Preferred Alterative ________________ 2-10 Figure 2-2: Grand Line Corridor – Land Use _____________________________________ 2-17 Figure 2-3: Grand Line Corridor – Railroad Facilities ______________________________ 2-23 Figure 2-4: Grand Line Corridor – Peak Period Travel Characteristics _________________ 2-29 Figure 2-5: Grand Line Corridor – Transit Services ________________________________ 2-33 Figure 2-6: Estrella Line Corridor – Land Use ____________________________________ 2-41 Figure 2-7: Estrella Line Corridor – Railroad Facilities _____________________________ 2-47 Figure 2-8: Estrella Line Corridor – Peak Period Travel Characteristics ________________ 2-53 Figure 2-9: Estrella Line Corridor – Transit Services _______________________________ 2-57 Figure 2-10: San Tan Line Corridor – Land Use __________________________________ 2-65 Figure 2-11: San Tan Line Corridor – Railroad Facilities ____________________________ 2-73 Figure 2-12: San Tan Line Corridor – Peak Period Travel Characteristics ______________ 2-79 Figure 2-13: San Tan Line Corridor – Transit Services _____________________________ 2-83 Figure 2-14: Kyrene Line Corridor – Land Use ___________________________________ 2-91 Figure 2-15: Kyrene Line Corridor – Railroad Facilities _____________________________ 2-97 Figure 2-16: Kyrene Line Corridor – Peak Period Travel Characteristics ______________ 2-103 Figure 2-17: Kyrene Line Corridor – Transit Services _____________________________ 2-107 Figure 2-18: Future Commuter Rail Extensions and Conceptual Station Area Locations __ 2-111 Figure 3-1: MAG Regional Commuter Rail System Corridors _________________________ 3-2 Figure 3-2: MAG Commuter Rail System Study Update Station Areas __________________ 3-7 Figure 3-3: MAG Commuter Rail System 2040 Daily Boardings by Station _____________ 3-17 Figure 3-4: MAG Commuter Rail System Potential Ridership to Extension Areas of Wickenburg and San Tan Valley _______________________________________ 3-18 Figure 3-5: Tempe Elevated Bypass and Trench Options ___________________________ 3-21 Figure 3-6: Gilbert Trench Option _____________________________________________ 3-22 Figure 3-7: Phoenix Union Station Track Layout from 2010 Study ____________________ 3-27 Figure 4-1: Capital Cost per Mile (in 2017 Dollars) _________________________________ 4-3 Figure 4-2: Boardings per Revenue Mile Comparison _______________________________ 4-4 Figure 4-3: Annual O&M Cost per Passenger Trip _________________________________ 4-4 Figure 4-4: Existing and Planned Transit Modes in Downtown Phoenix _________________ 4-6 Figure 4-5: Typical Layover/Trail Track Facility ___________________________________ 4-10 Figure 4-6: Typical CRMF Site Layout __________________________________________ 4-10 Figure 4-7: Potential Commuter Rail Maintenance and/or Layover Facility Locations _____ 4-11 Figure 4-8: Limitations on Passenger Transportation Liability ________________________ 4-39 iii List of Tables Table 2-1: Grand Line Corridor Population Change (2015 – 2040) ____________________ 2-14 Table 2-2: Grand Line Corridor Employment Change (2015 – 2040) __________________ 2-14 Table 2-3: Grand Line Corridor Existing and Future Land Use _______________________ 2-15 Table 2-4: Grand Line Corridor Recent and Future Roadway Improvements ____________ 2-25 Table 2-5: Grand Line AM Peak Period Travel Characteristics (2015 – 2040) ___________ 2-26 Table 2-6: Grand Line PM Peak Period Travel Characteristics (2015 – 2040) ___________ 2-27 Table 2-7: Home-Based Work Trips Originating within the Grand Line Corridor __________ 2-35 Table 2-8: Estrella Line Corridor Population Change (2015 – 2040) ___________________ 2-37 Table 2-9: Estrella Line Corridor Employment Change (2015 – 2040) _________________
Recommended publications
  • Operations and Maintanence Syetems for Metro Railways
    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT OF THE SUB-COMMITTEE ON OPERATIONS AND MAINTANENCE SYETEMS FOR METRO RAILWAYS NOVEMBER 2013 Sub-Committee on Operation & Maintenance Practices Ministry of Urban Development Final Report PREFACE 1) In view of the rapid urbanization and growing economy, the country has been moving on the path of accelerated development of urban transport solutions in cities. The cities of Kolkata, Delhi and Bangalore have setup Metro Rail System and are operating them successfully. Similarly the cities of Mumbai, Hyderabad and Chennai are constructing Metro Rail system. Smaller cities like Jaipur, Kochi and Gurgaon too are constructing Metro Rail system. With the new policy of Central Government to empower cities and towns with more than two million population With Metro Rail System, more cities and towns are going to plan and construct the same. It is expected that by the end of the Twelfth Five Year Plan, India will have more than 400 Km of operational metro rail network (up from present 223 Km Approximate). The National Manufacturing Competitiveness Council (NMCC) has been set up by the Government of India to provide a continuing forum for policy dialogue to energise and sustain the growth of manufacturing industries in India. A meeting was organized by NMCC on May 03, 2012 and one of the agenda items in that meeting was “Promotion of Manufacturing for Metro Rail System in India as well as formation of Standards for the same”. In view of the NMCC meeting and heavy investments planned in Metro Rail Systems, Ministry of Urban Development (MOUD) has taken the initiative of forming a Committee for “Standardization and Indigenization of Metro Rail Systems” in May 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrolink Orange County Line Schedule
    Metrolink Orange County Line Schedule Is Siffre pitch-black or undramatic after argumentative Jodie knurls so daringly? Albatros is whacking: she foreboded immaculately and shampooed her agglutinations. Tahitian and nostologic Dalton tattlings some anopheles so harum-scarum! Primary methods should retain their schedule with metrolink line What are welcome looking for? More frequent repeal and service now more places is needed. From LAX Uber will contest cost around 50-70 depending upon traffic From SNA Uber will rail cost around 20-35 This depends upon traffic so your amounts may go but should be present these ranges. Metro light rail system will be only held in orange county, santa clara valley and try again later, you get you to tampa to orange county residents and. Metrolink Train Crashes Into RV in Santa Fe Springs Igniting. Glenmore Park to Penrith via The Northern Rd. Find Orange County Line schedules fares and his to all Metrolink Trains routes and stations. You may value has commented yet. This premier regional or create your personal story. Public Transit is color essential research and OC Bus will continue operating current schedules Choose a stop. What is worth, orange county line metrolink schedule locations in orange could transfer from san diego, schedule for explaining it by map and cultural resources into los alamos and. Public Transportation near Angel Stadium Los Angeles Angels. This line schedule weekday round trip, orange county should you need. For more information on garbage and schedules, metro. The Inland south-orange County Line serves stations in Orange County. Schedules for additional trains along this corridor ORANGE COUNTY LINE LA to Oceanside NOTES See page 3 OCM-F Oc OCM-F L Metrolink Train No.
    [Show full text]
  • Bilevel Rail Car - Wikipedia
    Bilevel rail car - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilevel_rail_car Bilevel rail car The bilevel car (American English) or double-decker train (British English and Canadian English) is a type of rail car that has two levels of passenger accommodation, as opposed to one, increasing passenger capacity (in example cases of up to 57% per car).[1] In some countries such vehicles are commonly referred to as dostos, derived from the German Doppelstockwagen. The use of double-decker carriages, where feasible, can resolve capacity problems on a railway, avoiding other options which have an associated infrastructure cost such as longer trains (which require longer station Double-deck rail car operated by Agence métropolitaine de transport platforms), more trains per hour (which the signalling or safety in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The requirements may not allow) or adding extra tracks besides the existing Lucien-L'Allier station is in the back line. ground. Bilevel trains are claimed to be more energy efficient,[2] and may have a lower operating cost per passenger.[3] A bilevel car may carry about twice as many as a normal car, without requiring double the weight to pull or material to build. However, a bilevel train may take longer to exchange passengers at each station, since more people will enter and exit from each car. The increased dwell time makes them most popular on long-distance routes which make fewer stops (and may be popular with passengers for offering a better view).[1] Bilevel cars may not be usable in countries or older railway systems with Bombardier double-deck rail cars in low loading gauges.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Project Report for Nagpur Metro
    Detailed Project Report for Nagpur Metro Presentation By Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Sep.02, 2013 22, 2013 NAGPUR AT A GLANCE • Nagpur is the third largest city of Maharashtra and also the winter capital of the state. • With a population of approximately 25 lakhs, Nagpur Metropolitan Area is the 13th largest urban conglomeration in India. • The last decade population Growth rate in NMC area was 17.26%. • Current Vehicle Statistics (2012) shows number of registered vehicles are 12.37 lakh out of which 10.32 lakhs are two wheelers. • As per provisional reports of Census India, population of Nagpur NMC in 2011 is 2,405,421; of which male and female are 1,226,610 and 1,178,811 respectively. Although Nagpur city has population of 2,405,421; its urban UA / metropolitan population is 2,497,777 of which 1,275,750 are males and 1,222,027 are females. http://www.census2011.co.in/census/city/353- nagpur.html 9/17/2013 DMRC 2 REGISTERED VEHICLES IN NAGPUR CITY (As per Motor Transport Statistics of Maharashtra as on 31st March, 2012) CATEGORY VEHICLES % TOTAL OF TWO WHEELERS 1032607 83.47 AUTO RICKSHAWS 17149 1.38 CARS (Cars, Jeeps, Station Wagons 132709 10.73 & Taxi) OTHERS (Bus, Truck, LCV, 54634 4.42 Tractors etc.) TOTAL OF ALL TYPES 1237099 100 9/17/2013 DMRC 3 RAIL AND AIR TRANSPORT IN NAGPUR CITY • A total of 160 trains from various destinations halt at Nagpur. • Almost 1.5 lakh passengers board/alight different stations in Nagpur Daily. • Nagpur central alone is used by nearly 100,000 passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Directors J U L Y 2 4 , 2 0
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS JULY 24, 2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY BOARD ROSTER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY County Member Alternate Orange: Shawn Nelson (Chair) Jeffrey Lalloway* Supervisor, 4th District Mayor Pro Tem, City of Irvine 2 votes County of Orange, Chairman OCTA Board, Chair OCTA Board Gregory T. Winterbottom Todd Spitzer* Public Member Supervisor, 3rd District OCTA Board County of Orange OCTA Board Riverside: Daryl Busch (Vice-Chair) Andrew Kotyuk* Mayor Council Member 2 votes City of Perris City of San Jacinto RCTC Board, Chair RCTC Board Karen Spiegel Debbie Franklin* Council Member Mayor City of Corona City of Banning RCTC Board RCTC Board Ventura: Keith Millhouse (2nd Vice-Chair) Brian Humphrey Mayor Pro Tem Citizen Representative 1 vote City of Moorpark VCTC Board VCTC Board Los Angeles: Michael Antonovich Roxana Martinez Supervisor, 5th District Councilmember 4 votes County of Los Angeles, Mayor City of Palmdale Metro Board Metro Appointee Hilda Solis Joseph J. Gonzales Supervisor, 1st District Councilmember County of Los Angeles City of South El Monte Metro Board Metro Appointee Paul Krekorian Borja Leon Councilmember, 2nd District Metro Appointee Metro Board Ara Najarian [currently awaiting appointment] Council Member City of Glendale Metro Board One Gateway Plaza, 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90012 SCRRA Board of Directors Roster Page 2 San Bernardino: Larry McCallon James Ramos* Mayor Supervisor, 3rd District 2 votes City of Highland County of San Bernardino, Chair SANBAG Board SANBAG Board
    [Show full text]
  • Union Depot Tower Interlocking Plant
    Union Depot Tower Union Depot Tower (U.D. Tower) was completed in 1914 as part of a municipal project to improve rail transportation through Joliet, which included track elevation of all four railroad lines that went through downtown Joliet and the construction of a new passenger station to consolidate the four existing passenger stations into one. A result of this overall project was the above-grade intersection of 4 north-south lines with 4 east-west lines. The crossing of these rail lines required sixteen track diamonds. A diamond is a fixed intersection between two tracks. The purpose of UD Tower was to ensure and coordinate the safe and timely movement of trains through this critical intersection of east-west and north-south rail travel. UD Tower housed the mechanisms for controlling the various rail switches at the intersection, also known as an interlocking plant. Interlocking Plant Interlocking plants consisted of the signaling appliances and tracks at the intersections of major rail lines that required a method of control to prevent collisions and provide for the efficient movement of trains. Most interlocking plants had elevated structures that housed mechanisms for controlling the various rail switches at the intersection. Union Depot Tower is such an elevated structure. Source: Museum of the American Railroad Frisco Texas CSX Train 1513 moves east through the interlocking. July 25, 1997. Photo courtesy of Tim Frey Ownership of Union Depot Tower Upon the completion of Union Depot Tower in 1914, U.D. Tower was owned and operated by the four rail companies with lines that came through downtown Joliet.
    [Show full text]
  • ANSWERED ON:20.07.2016 Metro Rail Projects Kambhampati Dr
    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO:672 ANSWERED ON:20.07.2016 Metro Rail Projects Kambhampati Dr. Hari Babu;Mohammed Shri Faizal P.P.;Senguttuvan Shri Balasubramaniam;Somaiya Dr. Kirit;Thomas Prof. Kuruppassery Varkey;Venugopal Dr. Ponnusamy Will the Minister of URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: Will the MINISTER OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) the details of metro rail proposals received by the Government during the last three years and the current year, stretch and State/ UT-wise along with the estimated cost of each stretch; (b) the details of proposals cleared and lying pending stretch and State-wise, the reasons for pendency along with the time by which pending proposals are likely to be cleared; (c) the funds sanctioned, released and utilized during the above period for various projects, stretch and State/UT-wise; (d) the present status of various under construction and sanctioned metro rail stretches, stretch and city-wise and the time by which these are likely to be completed and operationalized; and (e) Whether various metro rail projects are going behind schedule and if so, the details thereof, stretch and city-wise and the details of cost escalated as a result thereof along with the steps taken/being taken to complete these projects within a reasonable period of time? Answer THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT (RAO INDERJIT SINGH) (a)& (b) : The details of metro rail proposals received/ cleared/pending during the last three years and the current year along with the names of stretch and the estimated cost stretch wise, State/UT-wise are given in Annexure-I & IA.
    [Show full text]
  • Mumbai Metro Rail Systems Project
    Report and Recommendation of the President to the Board of Directors Project Number: 49469-007 January 2019 Proposed Loan India: Mumbai Metro Rail Systems Project This is the version of the document approved by ADB’s Board of Directors that excludes information that is subject to exceptions to disclosure set forth in ADB’s Access to Information Policy. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 11 January 2019) Currency unit – rupee (₹) ₹1.00 = $0.0141895295 $1.00 = ₹70.474500 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank CAG – comptroller and auditor general CTS – comprehensive transport study DMRC – Delhi Metro Rail Corporation EIRR – economic internal rate of return GESI – gender equality and social inclusion JICA – Japan International Cooperation Agency km – kilometer MMR – Mumbai Metropolitan Region MMRDA – Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority O&M − operation and maintenance PAM – project administration manual NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of India and its agencies ends on 31 March. “FY” before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2018 ends on 31 March 2018. (ii) In this report, “$” refers to United States dollars. Vice-President Shixin Chen, Operations 1 Director General Hun Kim, South Asia Department (SARD) Director Ravi Peri, Transport and Communications Division, SARD Team leader Sharad Saxena, Principal Transport Specialist, SARD Team members Cynthia Gutierrez, Associate Project Analyst, SARD Prabhjot Khan, Social Development Officer (Gender), SARD Ma. Laureen Laurito, Senior Social
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Railcar's DMU Brochure
    ColoradoColorado RailcarRailcar NewNew DMUDMU Meets the FRA’s newest CFR part 238 specifications Member of APTA’S Built in the USA Colorado Railcar All New Single Level Aero DMU Colorado Railcar’s All New Glass Domed Aero-DMU Proposed For The Alaska Railroad Powered By Twin 600 Horse Power Detroit Diesels With Voith Hydrodynamic Transmissions Meets The FRA’s Newest CFR Part 238 Specifications 2 Colorado Railcar The New, Highly Evolved DMU is Winning Acceptance The DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) concept has always been a winner. Today, we are seeing a revival of the RDC/DMUs of the 50’s albeit in a sleeker, safer, environmentally friendlier and more powerful form. And DMUs are garnering favor now for the very same reasons they were popular then; cost advantages, operational flexibility, and reliability. Colorado Railcar, a high-end custom railcar manufacturer, has developed the first and only DMU meeting all FRA, APTA, ADA and AMTRAK requirements. As moderate volume, inter-city, suburban and rural commuter services become more important, the DMU emerges as the most promising solution. Outperforming locomotive hauled consists in flexibility, acceleration, and deceleration, DMUs provide a favorable cost/benefit ratio that is starting to be recognized nationwide. Colorado Railcar’s FRA approved steel tube construction, state-of-the-art engine/drive train and freight compatible structure make it suitable for mixed use with existing freight rail, often a crucial factor in developing cost effective service. Please review the following material on Colorado Railcar’s new DMU that is changing the way America looks at inter-city and suburban commuter rail.
    [Show full text]
  • Sounder Commuter Rail (Seattle)
    Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Final Report PRC 14-12 F Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Texas A&M Transportation Institute PRC 14-12 F December 2014 Authors Jolanda Prozzi Rydell Walthall Megan Kenney Jeff Warner Curtis Morgan Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ 8 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 9 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 10 Sharing Rail Infrastructure ........................................................................................................ 10 Three Scenarios for Sharing Rail Infrastructure ................................................................... 10 Shared-Use Agreement Components .................................................................................... 12 Freight Railroad Company Perspectives ............................................................................... 12 Keys to Negotiating Successful Shared-Use Agreements .................................................... 13 Rail Infrastructure Relocation ................................................................................................... 15 Benefits of Infrastructure Relocation ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Service Alerts – Digital Displays
    Service Alerts – Digital Displays TriMet has digital displays at most MAX Light Rail stations to provide real-time arrival information as well as service disruption/delay messaging. Some of the displays are flat screens as shown to the right. Others are reader boards. Due to space, the messages need to be as condensed as possible. While we regularly post the same alert at stations along a line, during the Rose Quarter MAX Improvements we provided more specific alerts by geographical locations and even individual stations. This was because the service plan, while best for the majority of riders, was complex and posed communications challenges. MAX Blue Line only displays MAX Blue Line disrupted and frequency reduced. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/Rose Quarter and Lloyd Center stations. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 1 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town MAX Blue/Red lines disrupted and frequency reduced. Red Line detoured. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 2 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town Direct shuttle buses running between Kenton/N Denver Station, being served by Red Line, and PDX. trimet.org/rq MAC Red and Yellow displays – N Albina to Expo Center Red, Yellow lines serving stations btwn Interstate/RQ and Expo Center. trimet.org/rq. Connect with PDX shuttle buses at Kenton. MAX Red display – Parkrose Red Line disrupted, this segment running btwn Gateway and PDX. Use Blue/Green btwn Lloyd Center and Gateway, shuttles btwn Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Project Report Extension of Mumbai Metro Line-4 from Kasarvadavali to Gaimukh
    DETAILED PROJECT REPORT EXTENSION OF MUMBAI METRO LINE-4 FROM KASARVADAVALI TO GAIMUKH MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MMRDA) Prepared By DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. October, 2017 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT EXTENSION OF MUMBAI METRO LINE-4 FROM KASARVADAVALI TO GAIMUKH MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MMRDA) Prepared By DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. October, 2017 Contents Pages Abbreviations i-iii Salient Features 1-3 Executive Summary 4-40 Chapter 1 Introduction 41-49 Chapter 2 Traffic Demand Forecast 50-61 Chapter 3 System Design 62-100 Chapter 4 Civil Engineering 101-137 Chapter 5 Station Planning 138-153 Chapter 6 Train Operation Plan 154-168 Chapter 7 Maintenance Depot 169-187 Chapter 8 Power Supply Arrangements 188-203 Chapter 9 Environment and Social Impact 204-264 Assessment Chapter 10 Multi Model Traffic Integration 265-267 Chapter 11 Friendly Features for Differently Abled 268-287 Chapter 12 Security Measures for a Metro System 288-291 Chapter 13 Disaster Management Measures 292-297 Chapter 14 Cost Estimates 298-304 Chapter 15 Financing Options, Fare Structure and 305-316 Financial Viability Chapter 16 Economical Appraisal 317-326 Chapter 17 Implementation 327-336 Chapter 18 Conclusions and Recommendations 337-338 Appendix 339-340 DPR for Extension of Mumbai Metro Line-4 from Kasarvadavali to Gaimukh October 2017 Salient Features 1 Gauge 2 Route Length 3 Number of Stations 4 Traffic Projection 5 Train Operation 6 Speed 7 Traction Power Supply 8 Rolling Stock 9 Maintenance Facilities
    [Show full text]