DOCSLIB.ORG

Bilevel Rail Car - Wikipedia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bilevel Rail Car - Wikipedia Bilevel rail car - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilevel_rail_car Bilevel rail car The bilevel car (American English) or double-decker train (British English and Canadian English) is a type of rail car that has two levels of passenger accommodation, as opposed to one, increasing passenger capacity (in example cases of up to 57% per car).[1] In some countries such vehicles are commonly referred to as dostos, derived from the German Doppelstockwagen. The use of double-decker carriages, where feasible, can resolve capacity problems on a railway, avoiding other options which have an associated infrastructure cost such as longer trains (which require longer station Double-deck rail car operated by Agence métropolitaine de transport platforms), more trains per hour (which the signalling or safety in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The requirements may not allow) or adding extra tracks besides the existing Lucien-L'Allier station is in the back line. ground. Bilevel trains are claimed to be more energy efficient,[2] and may have a lower operating cost per passenger.[3] A bilevel car may carry about twice as many as a normal car, without requiring double the weight to pull or material to build. However, a bilevel train may take longer to exchange passengers at each station, since more people will enter and exit from each car. The increased dwell time makes them most popular on long-distance routes which make fewer stops (and may be popular with passengers for offering a better view).[1] Bilevel cars may not be usable in countries or older railway systems with Bombardier double-deck rail cars in low loading gauges. With the exception for Bombardier MultiLevel Germany, used extensively on Coaches, this includes much of the rail network in the North East of the suburban trains (here: S-Bahn USA, which includes the North East Corridor of Amtrak, New Jersey Rostock) Transit, Metro North and the Long Island Railroad as well as almost the entire British rail network. In some countries such as the UK new lines are built to a higher than the existing structure gauge to allow the use of double-deck trains in future.[4] Contents History Typical design Platform height and floor height issues Common low-platform design Uncommon very tall design Operators 1 of 15 2/9/2019, 2:37 PM Bilevel rail car - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilevel_rail_car Argentina Australia Canada China Denmark Finland France Hong Kong India Israel Italy Japan Russia Slovakia Sweden Switzerland Ukraine United Kingdom United States Long-distance trains Northeastern United States and Quebec California Florida Illinois Massachusetts New Mexico Other countries Gallery cars See also References External links History Double deck carriages date to at least as early as the second half of the 19th century. In France several hundred voitures à impériale with seats on the roof were in use by the Chemins de fer de l'Ouest, Chemins de fer de l'Est and Chemins de fer du Nord by 1870, having been in use for over 2 decades; the design was open at the sides with a light roof or awning covering the seats. In the 1860s M.J.B. Vidard introduced two-storied carriages on the Chemins de fer de l'Est, with a full body, windows, and doors; the same design lowered the floor of the lower storey to keep the center of gravity low. Vidard's carriages had a total height of 13 feet Voiture à impériale 8 inches (4.17 m) with the head height in the lower part of the carriage only 5 feet 5 inches (1.65 m); the carriages had a capacity of 80 persons (third class) in a 2 axle vehicle of 13 tons fully loaded.[5] 2 of 15 2/9/2019, 2:37 PM Bilevel rail car - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilevel_rail_car The Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad placed bilevel cars in commuter service in the Chicago area in 1950. These were successful, and led to the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway introducing long-distance Hi-Level cars on Chicago–Los Angeles El Capitan streamliner in 1954.[6][7] Typical design The double-deck design usually includes lowering the bottom floor to below the top level of the wheels, closer to the rails, and then adding an upper floor above. Such a design will fit under more bridges, tunnels and power wires (structure gauge). For cost and safety, this design also minimizes car height (loading gauge) and lowers the centre of gravity. Depending on train station platform heights, three designs can be used for entry - high platforms require use of a "split level" car design, where the doors are located on a middle level, with access into the upper or lower level branching off - with stairs or ramps going both up and down (sometimes this configuration includes a section of seating at the middle level in the entry section, with double levels only in part of the lengths of the car).[1] For low train station platforms, a "two floor" design with level entry onto the lower floor is used. Occasionally a third, very tall "two floors over-wheel" design is used. This is a traditional single floor car "with a second story" design with, when using low platform, requires steps up to a traditional floor height and then internal stairs up to the upper floor. Platform height and floor height issues There are four important height measurements above the railhead: platform height, traditional floor height, downstairs floor height and upstairs floor height. Platform height determines the level entry height for wheeled objects, such as luggage, strollers, wheelchairs and bicycles. Platform height is ideally standardized across all stations the train serves. Traditional rail car floor height matters for end doors connecting to existing single floor rail cars. Downstairs or lowest floor height is primarily determined by the thickness of the beams connecting the span between the wheels and bogies (trucks) of a rail car. The upstairs floor or highest floor height is above the lowest floor and must fit under bridges and tunnels. Level entry floor height must match the platform height. Hopefully either the traditional or downstairs floor height already matches the platform height. Despite the name "bilevel" or "double-decker", for maximum compatibility the rail car will have up to four different floor heights. High platform design (Using outside steps to avoid having a level entry from the platform) is troublesome. Common low-platform design Most low-platform double-decker trains have level entry onto the lower level of the car, allowing wheelchair access. There are two floor heights (upstairs and downstairs) in these "bilevel" cars. There is a staircase between floors inside the car. Connecting doors between cars are either at the (higher) upper floor or at an intermediate level over the bogies. In the former case, connecting directly to a single level car causes drag and connecting door problems. In the western USA, cars are of the upper-level-connection type. They use low-platform stations, because the traditional single floor trains all had exterior entry steps to maximize flexibility (emergency and temporary stops) and minimize infrastructure costs. There are no examples of two floor platforms, so there are no platform doors on the upper floor. Car roof lines lengthwise are flat for connecting doors to the upstairs of bi-level cars. A Bombardier Amtrak Superliner car is 16 feet 2 inches (4,928 mm) tall. 3 of 15 2/9/2019, 2:37 PM Bilevel rail car - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilevel_rail_car Uncommon very tall design 1 There are several very tall bilevel cars (e.g. Colorado Railcar has 19 feet 9 ⁄2 inches (6.033 m; 6,033 mm) . They typically are described as a traditional rail car with a second story. Most of these cars serve low platforms so they have exterior steps up to the traditional "over-wheel" floor height e.g. US 51 in (1,295 mm). End doors connect at the traditional height of existing rolling stock. Some cars have upstairs end doors as well. Many of these cars also include outside balconies on either the upper or lower level. Upstairs and downstairs connect by interior stairs. These cars can fit most able people, but lack level entry. On almost all these cars the upper level consists of a full length glass dome. Some cars are self-propelled Multiple Units so using traditional floor heights appears fixed. In towed cars it is possible to lower the downstairs floor between the wheels/bogies so that level entry is possible with more than 500 mm 5 (19 ⁄8 in) of added headroom and interior steps from that floor to the traditional floor. Operators Argentina In 2005, Emprendimientos Ferroviarios (Emfer), Trenes de Buenos Aires (TBA (Trains of Buenos Aires), National Institute of Industrial Technology and the Argentine National Government subscribed to a framework agreement to start the national designing and construction of bi-level electric trains. This was decided due to the overwhelming and increasing number of passengers using the 1,676 mm (5 ft 6 in) gauge urban Sarmiento Line, serving the centre and east of Greater Buenos Aires. The first prototype was released in 2005, but mass-production only started in mid 2008. In 2013, these coaches were retired from the line and replaced Argentine double-decker electric with new CSR Electric Multiple Units, though it remains unclear if the coaches. Emfer trains will be moved elsewhere in the country.[8] In 2010, Emprendimientos Ferroviarios and Trenes de Buenos Aires presented non-engined double-decker coaches for a 100 km (62 mi) diesel interurban link between Buenos Aires and Mercedes city.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety Headquarters Assigned Accident Investigation Report HQ-2006-88
    Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety Headquarters Assigned Accident Investigation Report HQ-2006-88 Union Pacific Midas, CA November 9, 2006 Note that 49 U.S.C. §20903 provides that no part of an accident or incident report made by the Secretary of Transportation/Federal Railroad Administration under 49 U.S.C. §20902 may be used in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter mentioned in the report. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT FRA File # HQ-2006-88 FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION 1.Name of Railroad Operating Train #1 1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. Union Pacific RR Co. [UP ] UP 1106RS011 2.Name of Railroad Operating Train #2 2a. Alphabetic Code 2b. Railroad Accident/Incident N/A N/A N/A 3.Name of Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance: 3a. Alphabetic Code 3b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. Union Pacific RR Co. [UP ] UP 1106RS011 4. U.S. DOT_AAR Grade Crossing Identification Number 5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident Month Day Year 11 09 2006 11:02: AM PM 7. Type of Accident/Indicent 1. Derailment 4. Side collision 7. Hwy-rail crossing 10. Explosion-detonation 13. Other (single entry in code box) 2. Head on collision 5. Raking collision 8. RR grade crossing 11. Fire/violent rupture (describe in narrative) 3. Rear end collision 6. Broken Train collision 9. Obstruction 12. Other impacts 01 8. Cars Carrying 9. HAZMAT Cars 10. Cars Releasing 11. People 12. Division HAZMAT Damaged/Derailed HAZMAT Evacuated 0 0 0 0 Roseville 13. Nearest City/Town 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Equipment Roster
    Location 3400 NE Grand Blvd. Oklahoma City, OK 73111 (405) 424-8222 Conveniently located just a half mile west of Interstate 35 off Exit 131 (NE 36th Street), on historic Grand Boulevard. - Half-mile east of Martin Luther King Boulevard - Just south of Lincoln Park Golf Course - 1 mile south of the Oklahoma City Zoo Oklahoma Railway Museum 3400 NE Grand Blvd. Oklahoma City, OK 73111 (405) 424-8222 www.oklahomarailwaymuseum.org EQUIPMENT ROSTER 40 1 Oklahoma Railway Museum The Oklahoma Railway Museum, Ltd. Bridge Logos (ORM) offers 35-minute excursion trains on the first and third Saturdays of each month for the public from 10 am until 4 pm starting the first Saturday in April. The trains leave the historic Oakwood Depot at 9:15, 11:15, 1:15 and 3:15 The Museum itself is open Thursday - Saturday from 9 am to 4 pm and there is no admission charge to tour the grounds. Train rides are free for children under the age of 3, $5 for children 3 years to 12 years, and These Frisco and Rock Island Railroad $12 for those 13 years and older. In heralds were displayed for almost 80 years addition to the train ride, railroad (1931-2010) on Oklahoma City’s South equipment, including motor cars, Robinson Street Bridge. The bridge was locomotives and passenger cars, are on located approximately a half mile east of display. A display car contains permanent Union Station and allowed both railroads to exhibits of railroad memorabilia. pass above Robinson to access to the station. The bridge was torn down to make Oakwood Station way for a new bridge with the rerouting of the I-40 crosstown expressway.
    [Show full text]
  • 40Thanniv Ersary
    Spring 2011 • $7 95 FSharing tihe exr periencste of Fastest railways past and present & rsary nive 40th An Things Were Not the Same after May 1, 1971 by George E. Kanary D-Day for Amtrak 5We certainly did not see Turboliners in regular service in Chicago before Amtrak. This train is In mid April, 1971, I was returning from headed for St. Louis in August 1977. —All photos by the author except as noted Seattle, Washington on my favorite train to the Pacific Northwest, the NORTH back into freight service or retire. The what I considered to be an inauspicious COAST LIMITED. For nearly 70 years, friendly stewardess-nurses would find other beginning to the new service. Even the the flagship train of the Northern Pacific employment. The locomotives and cars new name, AMTRAK, was a disappoint - RR, one of the oldest named trains in the would go into the AMTRAK fleet and be ment to me, since I preferred the classier country, had closely followed the route of dispersed country wide, some even winding sounding RAILPAX, which was eliminat - the Lewis and Clark Expedition of 1804, up running on the other side of the river on ed at nearly the last moment. and was definitely the super scenic way to the Milwaukee Road to the Twin Cities. In addition, wasn’t AMTRAK really Seattle and Portland. My first association That was only one example of the serv - being brought into existence to eliminate with the North Coast Limited dated to ices that would be lost with the advent of the passenger train in America? Didn’t 1948, when I took my first long distance AMTRAK on May 1, 1971.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Environmental Report 2000
    Annual Environmental Report 2000 Committee on Ecology 2. Efforts regarding global environmental conservation Disruption of the global environment has global environmental issues lies in the fact that become an important concern for us all. Global we are assailants and victims at the same time. warming—believed to be caused by green- As the unit of CO2 emission from railways in house gases such as CO2—could have a seriously proportion to transportation volume is low in detrimental impact on our future, in terms of comparison to other means of transportation, both time and space. The effects of further notably the automobile (see page 34), railways global warming include a change in overall cli- are in relative terms an environment-friendly mate, which will in turn effect the worldwide means of getting from one point to the next. ecosystem and bring about a rise in sea levels. Moreover, electric trains do not emit any CO2 in The emission of large volumes of CO2 into operation, since their power source is electricity. the air—a result of the use of fossil fuels— The volume of energy consumption by JR places the blame for global warming on us, the East, however, has reached 58.7 billion MJ citizens of our environment. Therefore, while (worth 1.52 million kl of crude oil) in fiscal 1999. the products of industry and technology have This means that, however indirectly, we still produced real and lasting benefits, it is undeni- emit a large volume of CO2. JR East is striving to able that they have created problems that, prevent further global warming through reduc- unless they are resolved, will forever impact life tions in energy consumption and CO2 emission.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Railcar's DMU Brochure
    ColoradoColorado RailcarRailcar NewNew DMUDMU Meets the FRA’s newest CFR part 238 specifications Member of APTA’S Built in the USA Colorado Railcar All New Single Level Aero DMU Colorado Railcar’s All New Glass Domed Aero-DMU Proposed For The Alaska Railroad Powered By Twin 600 Horse Power Detroit Diesels With Voith Hydrodynamic Transmissions Meets The FRA’s Newest CFR Part 238 Specifications 2 Colorado Railcar The New, Highly Evolved DMU is Winning Acceptance The DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) concept has always been a winner. Today, we are seeing a revival of the RDC/DMUs of the 50’s albeit in a sleeker, safer, environmentally friendlier and more powerful form. And DMUs are garnering favor now for the very same reasons they were popular then; cost advantages, operational flexibility, and reliability. Colorado Railcar, a high-end custom railcar manufacturer, has developed the first and only DMU meeting all FRA, APTA, ADA and AMTRAK requirements. As moderate volume, inter-city, suburban and rural commuter services become more important, the DMU emerges as the most promising solution. Outperforming locomotive hauled consists in flexibility, acceleration, and deceleration, DMUs provide a favorable cost/benefit ratio that is starting to be recognized nationwide. Colorado Railcar’s FRA approved steel tube construction, state-of-the-art engine/drive train and freight compatible structure make it suitable for mixed use with existing freight rail, often a crucial factor in developing cost effective service. Please review the following material on Colorado Railcar’s new DMU that is changing the way America looks at inter-city and suburban commuter rail.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Mechanical Department
    OVERVIEW OF MECHANICAL DEPARTMENT Mechanical Department plays a vital role in the organization by providing its support to both train operations and project division. The department is headed by Chief Mechanical Engineer, who reports to Director (Operations & Commercial). He is supported with officers and staff at Corporate Office, Ratnagiri and Karwar regions for both Open Line and Project Wing The organization structure for Rolling Stock Operation & Maintenance (Open Line) and Project Wing is as below CME Rolling Stock O&M Project Wing CME(Project) Karwar Region Corporate office Ratnagiri Region Dy CMIT Sr.RME / Madgaon Dy.CME/HQ SME RME/Ratnagriri /Operation SME/Project AME/ Ratnagiri SME AME/ SME/Madgaon /Verna Verna (I&II) The Key Performance Areas (KPAs) of Mechanical Department are following A: Rolling Stock Operation & Maintenance Train Operations including locomotive operation, crew management & training and management of RCDs Passenger Rake Maintenance (Including Primary, Secondary and IOH) Freight Train Examination and Maintenance Conversion/Fabrication and Maintenance of Roll-On Roll-Off Rakes Maintenance and Operation of Track Machines and Rail Mobile Vehicles (RMV) Maintenance of Tower Wagons (DETC) Maintenance and Operation of Rescue Trains (ART/SPARMVs/140T Crane) and disaster management Training of Running and Non Running Staff including Electrical Conversion Training Coordination for Environment & Housekeeping Management B: Project Wing Construction of Rolling Stock Component Factory for Indian Railways Development
    [Show full text]
  • How Understanding a Railway's Historic Evolution Can Guide Future
    College of Engineering, School of Civil Engineering University of Birmingham Managing Technical and Operational Change: How understanding a railway’s historic evolution can guide future development: A London Underground case study. by Piers Connor Submitted as his PhD Thesis DATE: 15th February 2017 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Managing Technical & Operational Development PhD Thesis Abstract The argument for this thesis is that patterns of past engineering and operational development can be used to support the creation of a good, robust strategy for future development and that, in order to achieve this, a corporate understanding of the history of the engineering, operational and organisational changes in the business is essential for any evolving railway undertaking. It has been the objective of the author of this study to determine whether it is essential that the history and development of a railway undertaking be known and understood by its management and staff in order for the railway to function in an efficient manner and for it to be able to develop robust and appropriate improvement strategies in a cost-effective manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Railways on Environment: Lok Sabha 2012-13
    Railways on Environment: Lok Sabha 2012-13 Q. No. Q. Type Date Ans by Members Title of the Questions Subject Political State Ministry Specific Party Representative 15.03.2012 Shri Sanjay Bhoi Dedicated Freight EIA INC Odisha *55 Starred Railways Corridor Shri Anand Prakash Paranjpe SS Maharashtra 675 15.03.2012 Shri Hamdullah Sayeed Trains Passing through Wildlife INC Lakshadweep Unstarred Railways Forests Management Shri P.L.Punia INC Uttar Pradesh Freshwater Passenger and Marine *138 Starred 22.03.2012 Railways Shri Anirudhan Sampath Facilities/Amenities Conservation CPI(M) Kerala Health and Shri P.L.Punia Sanitation INC Uttar Pradesh Water Management Health and 1492 Unstarred 22.03.2012 Railways Km.Saroj Pandey Public Amenities Sanitation BJP Chhattisgarh Water Shri Sanjay Singh Chauhan Management RLD Uttar Pradesh Shri N. Peethambara Kurup Pollution INC Kerala Shri Rajendra Agrawal BJP Uttar Pradesh Shri Devji Mansingram Patel BJP Rajasthan Toilet Facilities along Health and 2744 Unstarred 29.03.2012 Railways Shri N.Chaluvaraya Swamy Railway Tracks Sanitation JD(S) Karnataka Pollution Amenities at Sitapur Health and 3472 Unstarred 26.04.2012 Railways Smt. Kaisar Jahan Railway Station Sanitation BSP Uttar Pradesh Pollution Disposal of Scrap by *385 Starred 03.05.2012 Railways Shri P.L.Punia Railways Pollution INC Uttar Pradesh Toilets In MEMU Health and 4406 Unstarred 03.05.2012 Railways Shri Naveen Jindal Trains Sanitation INC Haryana Shri Sambandam Water Vending Water 4517 Unstarred 03.05.2012 Railways Keerapalayam Alagiri Machines
    [Show full text]
  • WSK Commuter Rail Study
    Oregon Department of Transportation – Rail Division Oregon Rail Study Appendix I Wilsonville to Salem Commuter Rail Assessment Prepared by: Parsons Brinckerhoff Team Parsons Brinckerhoff Simpson Consulting Sorin Garber Consulting Group Tangent Services Wilbur Smith and Associates April 2010 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 3 WHAT IS COMMUTER RAIL? ................................................................................................... 3 GLOSSARY OF TERMS............................................................................................................ 3 STUDY AREA....................................................................................................................... 4 WES COMMUTER RAIL.......................................................................................................... 6 OTHER PASSENGER RAIL SERVICES IN THE CORRIDOR .................................................................. 6 OUTREACH WITH RAILROADS: PNWR AND BNSF .................................................................. 7 PORTLAND & WESTERN RAILROAD........................................................................................... 7 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY ..................................................................................................... 7 ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Accident Investigation Report
    RA2007-8-I Railway Accident Investigation Report Train Derailment Accident between Urasa station and Nagaoka station of the Joetsu Shinkansen of the East Japan Railway Company November 30, 2007 Aircraft and Railway Accidents Investigation Commission i The objective of the investigation conducted by the Japan Transport Safety Board in accordance with the Act for Establishment of the Aircraft and Railway Accidents Investigation Commission to determine the causes of an accident and damage incidental to such an accident, thereby preventing future accidents and reducing damage. It is not the purpose of the investigation to apportion blame or liability. Norihiro Goto Chairman Aircraft and Railway Accidents Investigation Commission Note: This report is a translation of the Japanese original investigation report. The text in Japanese shall prevail in the interpretation of the report. ii Railway Accident Investigation Report Railway operator : East Japan Railway Company Accident type : Train derailment Date and time : About 17:56, October 23, 2004 Location : Around 206,207 m from the origin in Omiya Station, between Urasa station and Nagaoka station, Joetsu Shinkansen, Nagaoka City, Niigata Prefecture November 1, 2007 Adopted by the Aircraft and Railway Accidents Investigation Commission Chairman Norihiro Goto Member Yukio Kusuki Member Toshiko Nakagawa Member Akira Matsumoto Member Masayuki Miyamoto Member Norio Tomii Member Shinsuke Endoh Member Noboru Toyooka Member Yuki Shuto Member Akiko Matsuo iii Contents 1. PROCESS AND PROGRESS OF THE RAILWAY ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION 1 1.1. Summary of the Railway Accident 1 1.2. Outline of the Railway Accident Investigation 1 1.2.1. Organization of the Investigation 1 1.2.2. Implementation of the Investigation 2 1.2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Shinkansen - Wikipedia 7/3/20, 1048 AM
    Shinkansen - Wikipedia 7/3/20, 10)48 AM Shinkansen The Shinkansen (Japanese: 新幹線, pronounced [ɕiŋkaꜜɰ̃ seɴ], lit. ''new trunk line''), colloquially known in English as the bullet train, is a network of high-speed railway lines in Japan. Initially, it was built to connect distant Japanese regions with Tokyo, the capital, in order to aid economic growth and development. Beyond long-distance travel, some sections around the largest metropolitan areas are used as a commuter rail network.[1][2] It is operated by five Japan Railways Group companies. A lineup of JR East Shinkansen trains in October Over the Shinkansen's 50-plus year history, carrying 2012 over 10 billion passengers, there has been not a single passenger fatality or injury due to train accidents.[3] Starting with the Tōkaidō Shinkansen (515.4 km, 320.3 mi) in 1964,[4] the network has expanded to currently consist of 2,764.6 km (1,717.8 mi) of lines with maximum speeds of 240–320 km/h (150– 200 mph), 283.5 km (176.2 mi) of Mini-Shinkansen lines with a maximum speed of 130 km/h (80 mph), and 10.3 km (6.4 mi) of spur lines with Shinkansen services.[5] The network presently links most major A lineup of JR West Shinkansen trains in October cities on the islands of Honshu and Kyushu, and 2008 Hakodate on northern island of Hokkaido, with an extension to Sapporo under construction and scheduled to commence in March 2031.[6] The maximum operating speed is 320 km/h (200 mph) (on a 387.5 km section of the Tōhoku Shinkansen).[7] Test runs have reached 443 km/h (275 mph) for conventional rail in 1996, and up to a world record 603 km/h (375 mph) for SCMaglev trains in April 2015.[8] The original Tōkaidō Shinkansen, connecting Tokyo, Nagoya and Osaka, three of Japan's largest cities, is one of the world's busiest high-speed rail lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Trips, Excursions, Special Journeys, Outings, Tours, and Milestones In, To, from Or Through New Jersey
    TRANSPORTATION TRIPS, EXCURSIONS, SPECIAL JOURNEYS, OUTINGS, TOURS, AND MILESTONES IN, TO, FROM OR THROUGH NEW JERSEY Bill McKelvey, Editor, Updated to Mon., Mar. 8, 2021 INTRODUCTION This is a reference work which we hope will be useful to historians and researchers. For those researchers wanting to do a deeper dive into the history of a particular event or series of events, copious resources are given for most of the fantrips, excursions, special moves, etc. in this compilation. You may find it much easier to search for the RR, event, city, etc. you are interested in than to read the entire document. We also think it will provide interesting, educational, and sometimes entertaining reading. Perhaps it will give ideas to future fantrip or excursion leaders for trips which may still be possible. In any such work like this there is always the question of what to include or exclude or where to draw the line. Our first thought was to limit this work to railfan excursions, but that soon got broadened to include rail specials for the general public and officials, special moves, trolley trips, bus outings, waterway and canal journeys, etc. The focus has been on such trips which operated within NJ; from NJ; into NJ from other states; or, passed through NJ. We have excluded regularly scheduled tourist type rides, automobile journeys, air trips, amusement park rides, etc. NOTE: Since many of the following items were taken from promotional literature we can not guarantee that each and every trip was actually operated. Early on the railways explored and promoted special journeys for the public as a way to improve their bottom line.
    [Show full text]