<<

Flood Preparedness Workshop Summary Report – 2012

Food security and Agriculture Cluster – TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF ACRONYMS: ...... 4 SUMMARY REPORT ON REGIONAL FSAC ...... 6 FLOOD PREPAREDNESS AND LIVELIHOODS WORKSHOPS ...... 6

A: OBJECTIVES OF THE WORKSHOP ...... 6 B: WORKSHOPS PROCESS AND METHODOLOGY ...... 7 C: FSAC RESPONSE CAPACITY (SUMMARY OF 3 WS, NARRATIVE OF MAIN PLAYERS AND CAPACITIES, SUMMARY OF GAPS….) ...... 8 WHO WORKS WHERE? ...... 8 WHO DOES WHAT IN TERMS OF EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS? ...... 12 WHO DOES WHAT IN TERMS OF EMERGENCY RESPONSE? ...... 13 D: EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PLAN OUTLINE ...... 15 CONCLUSION ...... 15 APPENDIX I: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS ...... 16 1.1. Western Region List of Participants ...... 16 1.2. Northern Region List of Participants ...... 18 1.3. Eastern Region List of Participants ...... 20 APENDIXE II AND III: MAPS OF 3WS ...... 21 2.1 Western Region Maps of 3Ws ...... 21 2.2 Northern Region Maps of 3Ws ...... 21 2.2 Eastern Region Maps of 3Ws ...... 21 APENDIXEIII: FLOOD RISK MAPS ...... 21 3.1. Western Region Map of Flood Risk Zones ...... 21 3.2. Northern Region Map of Flood Risk Zones ...... 21 3.3. Eastern Region Map of Flood Risk Zones ...... 21 4.1. Western Region ...... 21 APPENDIX VI: IMPACT ON LIVELIHOOD AND FLOOD CONTINGENCY PLANNING: RESPONSE OPTIONS ANALYSIS MATRIX ...... 21 4.1. Northern Region ...... 21 4.2. Eastern Region ...... 21 5.1. Western Region ...... 21 APPENDIX V: OPTION FOR MITIGATION AND PRIORITIES ...... 21 5.2. Northern Region ...... 21 5.2. Easter Region ...... 21 6.1. Western Region ...... 21 APENDIXE VI: TABLES OF RESPONSE PLANNING ...... 21 6.1. Northern Region ...... 21 6.1. Eastern Region ...... 21

LIST OF ACRONYMS:

3Ws Who is doing What and Where

ACTED Agency for Technical Cooperation and Development

ADEO Afghanistan Development and Education Organization

AHDAA Agency for Humanitarian and Development Assistance for Afghanistan

ANDMA Afghanistan National Disaster Management Authority

AREA Agency for Rehabilitation and Energy Conservation in Afghanistan

CoAR Coordination of Afghan Relief

DACAAR Danish Committee for Aid to Afghan Refugees

DAIL Directorate of Agriculture, Irrigation and livestock (at provincial level)

FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

FSAC Food Security and Agriculture Cluster Afghanistan

IOM International Organization for Migration

MAIL Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock

NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization

NGO Nongovernmental Organization

NPO/RRA Rural Rehabilitation Association for Afghanistan OCHA United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs

PIN People in Need

RAF Response Analysis Framework

SDO Sanayee Development Organization

SWHNO Shams Women’s Need and Help Organization

SC Save the Children

UN United Nations

WFP World Food Program

ZOA Zuidoost-Azië Summary Report on Regional FSAC

Flood Preparedness and Livelihoods Workshops

A: Objectives of the workshop From March to May 2012, the Food Security and Agriculture Cluster (FSAC) conducted three (3) regional flood preparedness workshops to develop livelihood based flood preparedness plans and develop a common understanding of livelihoods zoning and response capacity of FSAC partners across Afghanistan. Beforehand, an initial national meeting was held in Kabul in early March with heads of agencies and emergency coordinators of key FSAC partners to present the plan and request input into the process. The objective of the workshops was to reinforce the capacity of the FSA community to provide improved responses to flood events within Northern, Western and Eastern regions. Expected results encompassed the identification of the lost potentially flooded areas within each region, the better understanding of both the local livelihoods and coping capacities to flood events. Outputs gathered provincial maps targeting the potentially most flooded areas, the list of priority responses - including emergency, rehabilitation and mitigation options- , a 3Ws excel file providing data about the local capacity of humanitarian actors, as well as regional maps of gaps in response planning

Other sources of information The FSAC initiative did not duplicate with other flood preparedness initiatives. At the provincial level, ANDMA has the responsibility to coordinate emergency responses to rapid on-set hazards such as floods. At the regional level, OCHA develops a contingency planning that encompasses food security. The latter provides an operational plan, including main contacts. Although most flood- prone areas could be identified in each province, the workshop has not as an objective to provide figures about the population that might most likely be affected by floods. We would recommend therefore the reader to refer to available information. iMMAP and WFP have developed flood models and maps, using the same sources of information (NATO), while OCHA has produced a flood map based on the experience of the past years.

B: Workshops process and methodology The selection of the regions was based on several criteria as the FSAC capacity to conduct workshops in the region (existence of a FSAC regional cluster and plan to roll-out the cluster at the regional level), the likelihood of major flood events, and the security conditions. FSAC was aware that needs are also acute in the South Eastern and North Eastern regions. The methodology gave high consideration to working groups, so that FSAC was capable to capture local knowledge. Participants gathered representatives from different type of agencies, including government authorities (ANDMA, DAIL), local NGOs, International NGOs, UN agencies, IFRC and ARCS. Almost all participants were afghans, employed as fieldworkers as well as coordinators at the provincial and regional levels. Each workshop lasted 1.5 day, and covered the below mentioned areas of investigation. For further information, please refer to the detailed agenda as well as facilitating tools in appendices.

Session 1 - Presentation of the flood specific 3Ws tool: Each participating agency was sent the flood specific 3Ws tool and asked to provide their contribution by a few days before the starting date of the workshop. The objective was to provide the participants with a map that clearly shows the capacity and the geographical gaps to respond to a flood event at provincial level. A database has been elaborated on the basis of available information (3Ws map is attached in appendix 2. The map also displays information about accessibility at the district level. Areas qualified as inaccessible may have very restricted accessibility to district capital. A second map in appendix 3 provides information about the current locations of key staffs from agencies.

Session 2 – Identification of most flood prone areas: The second session was dedicated to the identification of flood prone areas. Provincial working groups divided each province in three (3) different zones, namely most flood prone, medium and less prone areas to flood. Their practical knowledge of the terrain has been key to split up provinces in areas. Output of the workshop is attached in appendix 4.

Session 3 – Identification of livelihood main patterns: For each single flood prone area, the participants were requested to provide, within provincial working groups, the main features of the local livelihoods. FSAC provided regional maps with livelihood zoning, that was produced thanks to the 2011 FEWSNET report. Main outputs of this session is attached in appendix 5.

Session 4 – Identification of potential impacts on livelihoods: The analysis of the impact on livelihoods has been coupled with the identification of the response planning. FSAC, more particularly the RAF officer, had therefore prepared a facilitation tools providing examples on potential impacts on livelihoods. Outputs are attached in appendix 6.

Session 5 & 6 – Identification of potential responses (emergency, rehabilitation, mitigation): During these two sessions, working groups were requested to list and rank the priority response options according to the livelihoods and the risks on the latter. For more details about the output of this session, please refer to appendix 7.

Session 7 – Presentation of existing disaster plans and gap analysis: OCHA or ANDMA had different levels of preparations in the three workshops ; disaster plans were not always ready by the time of the events ; and therefore no gap analysis could be carried out.

Session 8 – Developing priority response plans: Working groups were requested to develop the responses they identified as a priority. They could provide details about the expected number of beneficiaries, modalities of implementation, timeliness, list the experienced agencies. Appendix 8 provides extra information. C: FSAC Response Capacity (summary of 3 Ws, narrative of main players and capacities, summary of gaps….) On the basis of the answers provided by the workshop participants, a database has been elaborated and provide a large range of information. Its accuracy depends upon the number of quality of the responses received. A few significant NGOs did not participate to the event, and data from missing NGOs has not been collected so far. FSAC is therefore aware there might be some discrepancies, and will try refining information through regular communications with FSAC members. The database is posted to FSAC webpage to facilitate the access to data to the most important number of FSAC partners. The latter will be able as well to contact FSAC monitoring officer to ask for specific requests. Who Works Where? Just a few questions were asked about the NGO’s presence at the district level: locations of the offices, districts covered by present operations, districts covered by past operations. The below tables summarize main results for the north region. More information, including for other eastern and Western regions are accessible through the flood-specific 3Ws.

Table: Example for the north region - Distribution of offices

The table is self explanatory. The province of is very well covered as most NGOs reporting having activities in the northern province, have an office in Mazar-e-Sharif, province of Balkh. On the contrary, the remote provinces of Sari Pul and Faryab have a lower NGO presence. ADEO, CoAR, Save the Children and ZOA reported having offices in three different provinces or more.

Agencies Balkh Sari Pul Samangan Jawzjan Faryab Total

ACTED 1 1

Action Aid 1 2 3 ADEO 2 2 2 6

Afghanaid 4 4 AREA 1 1 CoAR 3 3 5 11 DACCAR 4 4 IOM 1 1 PIN 6 3 9 SC 2 1 2 4 9 Solidarités 2 2 SWHNO 1 1 2 Tear Fund 1 1 WFP 1 1 2 ZOA 4 4 1 9 Total 27 8 11 8 11

Table: Example of the Northern Region - Number of districts covered by present operations in each province

Save The Children has a massive presence in the northern region, having current operations in 17 districts. People in Need, Solidarités International and ZOA reported intervening in at least 7 different districts. Considering the fact that WFP reports working in all provinces and all districts, there is no gap concerning emergency food distributions.

Agencies Balkh Saripul Samangan Jawzjan Faryab Total ACTED 3 3 Action Aid 1 2 3

ADEO 2 1 2 5

Afghanaid 4 4

AREA 4 4 CoAR 2 3 5 DACAAR 5 5

People in need 5 3 8

SAVE the Children 1 1 7 8 17

Solidarités Int. 7 7 SWHNO 1 1 2 Tear Fund 3 3 ZOA 7 1 8 total 22 10 15 15 12

Who does what in terms of emergency preparedness? Data concerning the capacity of emergency preparedness has also been assessed throughout the flood specific 3Ws tool for the three (3) regions. FSAC members were asked to report on their activities about contingency planning, disaster-risk reduction and early warning. They were also kindly requested to provide data about staffs that received training in emergency assessments and responses. As a contribution to an improved emergency preparedness mechanism, FSAC will build upon the data collected and organize upcoming events at the regional level, to upgrade capacities of FSAC partners. An operational plan will soon be developed to this regard.

Please find below the list of agencies present in the Northern Region – as an example - that reported having capacities and activities in the fields of emergency preparedness:

Trained staffs in rapid Contingency Disaster Risk Reduction # Agencies Early warning Assessment Response planning (DRR) 1 ACTED X X X X 2 Action Aid X x X 3 ADEO x X 4 Afghanaid x X X x X 5 AHDAA X X X X X 6 AREA X X X X 7 CoAR x X x X 8 DACAAR x X 9 IOM x X 10 PIN x X x X 11 NPO/RRA x X 12 Save the Children x X X X X 13 SDO X 14 Solidarités Int. x X 14 SWHNO X 15 Tearfund x X X X 16 WFP x x X X 17 World Vision x Who does what in terms of emergency response? In the event of a major rapid-on set disaster that goes beyond provincial capacities, information collected through the flood specific tool will be supportive to mobilize relevant agencies so that they can upscale their activities and provide support if they agree to do so. Data about the coverage area for each single agency has been collected and mapped (see in appendix) in the three (3) regions. As an example, in the tables below are summarized a few information about office locations and interventions areas.

Only six agencies plus WFP reported being capable to respond to emergencies, in the five days following a hazard. Considering the geographical coverage, Save the Children is key in all related activities, as reported it could intervene where others do not have a presence. Please refer to maps in appendices for more detailed information.

Table: Number of beneficiaries reported as assisted within 5 days – Example of the Northern Region.

Agencies Food distribution Water trucking Distribution of inputs

ACTED 4 districts*1500 - -

Action Aid 2 districts*200 2 districts*3000 -

AREA 12 districts*1000 12 districts*3000 12 districts*750 CoAR 12 districts*500 7 districts* up to 1800 11 districts*750 SC - 8 districts* 2000 - SWHNO 2 districts*100 2 districts*200 2 districts*100 The database provide refined information district by district, as well as data concerning the access to areas, the capacity of available warehouses. In appendices, the reader will find maps about emergency preparedness and response. They encompass the coverage per district in terms of contingency planning, early warning and DRR for preparedness; as well as distributions for response.

Table: example of the Northern Region - Number of districts covered by post emergency response

Cash grants & Feeding Animal feed, stocking/ Agencies Cash For Work Vouchers program destocking ACTED - 5 - - Action Aid 3 1 - 1 ADEO 5 - - - Afghanaid 2 - - 5 AREA 7 3 4 - CoAR 9 7 7 4 PIN 11 11 - 4 SC 23 6 - - Solidarités 1 - - - Tear Fund 4 1 - - WFP - 9 - - ZOA 2 - - 1 D: Emergency preparedness plan outline The outputs of the workshops provides answers to different types of needs. As mentioned earlier, some districts are just covered by WFP and not by any other agency. Despite the capacity of the latter to respond anywhere to emergency food needs, many necessary activities related to contingency planning, disaster risk reduction and early warning cannot be therefore addressed as properly as if there were a continuous presence. In addition, needs for mitigation and early warning interventions have been suggested by the provincial working groups during the workshop.

The workshop is a first stage of the process, that will go on with actions to remedy identify gaps at the district level. A refined analysis of the situation should now be carried out to this regard, to understand the gaps between the identified needed response options and the current capacity of existing NGOs to cover them, in terms of expertise and funding. Main conclusions from this refined analysis will support the drafting of a advocacy document, a useful tool to link with longer-term options and early recovery.

Response options depend upon the livelihoods in each single district. In the appendices, a map summarizes the main findings to this regards. Please refer to appendices 6, 7 and 8.

Conclusion This workshop provided the opportunity for officers from different provinces and agencies to share their views about flood preparedness and response, and get a comprehensive picture about the current situation. Yet, the information produced is valuable and is definitely supportive towards its mission of supporting emergency preparedness and response.

APPENDIX I: List of participants 1.1. Western Region List of Participants Western Region Flood Preparedness Workshop Participants List

No. Province Agency Name Position 1 Hirat RAADA M. Hassan Program Manager 2 Hirat OCHA Shahrokh Humanitarian Affairs Officer 3 Hirat WFP Elrashid Head of WFP Area Office 4 Hirat WFP Sheerin Noori National Program Officer 5 Hirat AHDAA Engu. M. Yousaf Deputy Director 6 Hirat AHDAA Ahmad Tareq Marketing Officer 7 Hirat CAID Eng. M. Yaqoob Sr. Program Officer 8 Hirat CAID Waheed Ahmad Program Officer 9 Hirat Worldvision Nazir Sr. Commodities Officer 10 Hirat SDO Sayed Maroof Program Officer 11 Hirat SDO Farhad EH Officer 12 Hirat RWDOA Ahmad Farid Executive Director 13 Hirat RWDOA Moh. Yousaf Livelihood Program Coordinator 14 Hirat ARAA Dr. Sebghatullah Program Manager 15 Hirat DAIL Dr. Ahmad Zai Deputy Director of DAIL 16 Hirat CHA Amanullah Monitoring Officer 17 Hirat SDO Wahidullah Project Manager 18 Hirat IRC Amir M & E Officer 19 Hirat IFRC Dr. M. Maroof Program Officer 20 Hirat ARCS M. Nader DM 21 Hirat ARCS M. Naser Member of DRU 22 Hirat CRDSA Gh.Yahya 23 Hirat CRDSA Faez 24 Hirat AREA Eng. Raqeeb Regional Manager 25 Hirat NPO/RRAA Sayed Masoud Master Trainer 26 Hirat WDOA Shaima Project Officer 27 Hirat FAO Hirat Nabi Gul RCO 28 Hirat FAO Hirat Salim Faiz Assistant 29 Hirat FAO Hirat Aziz Ahmad Assistant 30 Hirat WDOA Khadija Field Officer 31 Herat DAIL Basir Ahmad Head of Plant Protection Department 32 Herat DAIL Abd. Aziz Head of Natural Resources Department 33 Hirat DAIL Tariq Head of Plans and programs, Facilitator 34 Ghor ANDMA Hamid Director 35 Ghor CAID partner M. Zarif Provincial Manager 36 Ghor CAID partner Dr. M. Saber IPMPL Project Manager 37 Ghor Worldvision Norulhaq Project Assitant 38 Ghor RWDOA Juma Khan Field Program Coordinator 39 Ghor ARAA Said Naeem Field Monitor 40 Ghor ARCS Nooradin DM 41 Ghor ARCS Aref Member 42 Ghor DAIL Faridudin Director of DAIL 43 Ghor DAIL Abd. Samad Head of Planning and Programs 44 Ghor CRS Abdul Malik Team Leader 45 Badghis ANDMA Aimaq Director 46 Badghis Worldvision Barekzay Sr. Zone Manager 47 Badghis ARCS Sefullah DM 48 Badghis ARCS Nasim Member 49 Badghis DAIL Zemari Head of Extension Department 50 Badghis DAIL Abdul wakil Head of Planning Department 51 Farah ANDMA Ayobi Director 52 Farah RWDOA Moh. Saleh Field Program Coordinator 53 Farah ARCS G. Rasool HQ.ARCS 54 Farah ARCS Mosa DM 55 Kabul FAO/FSAC Ulfatullah Malangyar National Food Security Officer 56 Kabul FAO/FSAC Sediqullah Rahmati Food Security Analyst 57 Kabul FAO/FSAC Dr. Abdul Basir IM/M&E Officer

1.2. Northern Region List of Participants

Northern Region Flood Preparedness Workshop Participants List

S/N Province Organization Name Title 1 Balkh Acted Khalil Ahmad BM 2 Balkh Action Aid Kanishka PO 3 Balkh ARCS Haji M. Yaseen DM Officer 4 Balkh Save the Dr. Dawood M& E children 5 Balkh IOM Zabiullah R.F.O 6 Balkh IOM Eng. Kakar RFO 7 Balkh ARCS Abdul Hamid DM 8 Balkh PIN Ehsan DPM 9 Balkh DACAAR Eng. Ab. Wali Regional Manager 10 Balkh Action Aid Arash Payeez Program Officer 11 Balkh SWNHO Abdul Zubir Officer 12 Balkh Johannitor Ashutosh Project Coordinator 13 Balkh Johannitor Dr. Rohullah Noori Training Coordinator 14 Balkh ANDMA Sayed Ishaq Mitigation Manager 15 Balkh Save the Dr. Fahim DRR Officer Children 16 Balkh AREA Ajmal Nil 17 Balkh Save the Ghulam Sakhi DRR Manager children 18 Balkh WFP M. Masoud Saqib NPO 19 Balkh ADEO S. Abdul Tawab 20 Balkh UNHCR UNHCR Sr. Field Associate 21 Balkh WFP Sven Thelin Program Officer 22 Faryab DACAAR Aminulhaq Regional Manager 23 Faryab ACTED Faiz Mohmammd PO 24 Faryab DAIL Assadullah Bahar Director 25 Faryab SWNHO Saltanat Kohi Director 26 Faryab ANDMA Haji-Abdulwahab 27 Faryab SWHNO Nabil 28 Faryab Save the Eng. Ab.Rahim Sr. Officer Children 29 Faryab Save the Eng. M. Rasool Officer Children 30 Faryab DAIL Assadullah Director 31 Jawzjan Action Aid Abdul Khaliq PO 32 Jawzjan Action Aid Shukrullah PO 33 Jawzjan Tear Fund Shafie P1M 34 Jawzjan ANDMA Eng. Aziz Director 35 Jawzjan DAIL Abdul Rashid Director 36 Jawzjan ARCS Ghulam Sakhi DM Officer 37 Jawzjan Save the Ghulam M. F Sr. Officer children 38 Jawzjan Save the Shukrullah DRR Officer Children 39 Jawzjan ZOA Ghulam Sakhi PM 40 Jawzjan Save the Soria Officer Children 41 province ARCS Abdul M DM valinter 42 Samangan ARCS Samiuddin DM Officer 43 Samangan solidarity Bashir Ahmad ERM AM 44 Samangan Afghanaid Saifullah P.C 45 Samangan solidarity Author ERM PM 46 Saripul ARCS M. Younas DM Officer 47 Saripul Save the Dr. Khan Agha DRR Sr. Officer Children 48 Saripul ZOA Eng. Parwana M & E Officer 49 Saripul ANDMA Sayed Fazlullah Director 50 Saripul COAR G. Yahya Field Officer

1.3. Eastern Region List of Participants Eastern Region Flood Preparedness Workshop Participants

S/N Province Agency Name Position 1 Nangarhar ADA Sardar Wali Extention worker 2 Nangarhar WFP M. Fahim Field Monitor 3 Nangarhar UNOCHA Jamal Naser Rafiqi HAO 4 Nangarhar FAO Khushal Asifi OIC 5 Nangarhar FAO Jalalabad Shahwali RFA 6 Nangarhar UNHCR Abdul Wali Sr. Field Assistant 7 Nangarhar ANDMA Sayed Naser Finance/HR 8 Nangarhar IRC Abdul Ghafar HP Officer 9 Nangarhar IRC Shafiullah M& E Officer 10 Nangarhar FGA Sardar Wali Master Trainer 11 Nangarhar FGA Haroon Rashid NSP Design Engineer 12 Nangarhar FGA Obaidullah Sherzai Master Trainer 13 Nangarhar IFRC S. Amin IFRC 14 Nangarhar ANDMA Dr. Rahmat Gul Dasister Officer 15 Nangarhar MADERA M. Yousaf M& E Officer 16 Nangarhar DAIL Abdul Ahad NA 17 Nangarhar SOFAR Mashal Khan Admin 18 Nangarhar DACAAR Gul Makhan Field Coordinator 19 Nangarhar SHPOUL Shafiullah Shahab Director 20 Nangarhar SHPOUL Walayat shah PC 21 Nangarhar IOM Anwarullah Regional Field Offcier 22 Nangarhar DAIL Ataulhaq Bashari Plan & policy Director 23 Nangarhar ANDMA S. Yaqob Pacha Mitigation Offcier 24 Nangarhar ANDMA Abdul Wahab Director 25 Nangarhar ARCS M. Iqbal Regional Director 26 Nangarhar ADA Asadullah Amini FS Officer 27 Laghman ANDMA M. Naim Nazari Director 28 Laghman DAIL Farhadullah Planning Officer 29 Laghman SADAAT Ajmal Field Officer 30 Laghman DAIL M. Ayoub Forestry Department Head 31 Laghman ABM Khalid Safi Program Officer 32 Laghman IOM Ahmad Fawad Field Assistan 33 Laghman ARCS Dr. Abdul Ghafar Director 34 Kunar SOFAR Firdos Khan OIC SOFAR 35 Kunar IOM Zabihullah Field Assistan 36 Kunar ANDMA Ghulam Ali Director 37 Kunar DAIL Fazal Rahman Extention worker 38 Kunar DAIL Eng. Mohasal Director 39 Nuristan ANDMA M. Afag Barizy Director 40 Nuristan DAIL Hazrat Omer Agriculture Officer 41 Kabul FAO/FSAC Ulfatullah Malangyar National Food Security Officer 42 Kabul FAO/FSAC Sediqullah Rahmati Food Security Analyst

APENDIXE II and III: MAPS Of 3Ws

2.1 Western Region Maps of 3Ws

2.2 Northern Region Maps of 3Ws

2.2 Eastern Region Maps of 3Ws

APENDIXEIII: Flood Risk Maps

3.1. Western Region Map of Flood Risk Zones

3.2. Northern Region Map of Flood Risk Zones

3.3. Eastern Region Map of Flood Risk Zones APPENDIX VI: Impact on livelihood and Flood Contingency Planning: Response Options Analysis Matrix 4.1. Western Region Province: Herat Zone: (High) Districts:Farsi, Zenda Jan, Chesht, Gulran

For each response option, Market dynamics Livelihood Key issues to be Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the favour Response Phases Impact on livelihood Component addressed options secure? capacity to respond at cash/vouchers or in Recommendation scale? kind . Creation of volunteers committees . Livestock . WFP . Accessible . Early Warning system . Area is secure . Food storage . Handcraft . loss of livelihood . Protect crops from . FAO . Food available Before Disaster . Food storage . Accessible . NFI Kits . Crop . No income from own flood impact. . ANDMA . Prices are not high . NFI kit . Phone available . Protection wall (Mitigation) production . Awareness raising . DAIL . Voucher . Business . Protection wall . Internet available . Potable water . ARCS . Cash . Gardening . First Aid kits . Potable water

. loss of livelihood . Support purchasing and . Area is secure . ANDMA . Accessible During Disaster . Food distribution . Livestock . No income from own income level . accessible . WFP . No enough Food available . Food distribution (1st phase . Cash transfer . Agencies contribution production . Increase accessibility to . Phone accessible . FAO . Prices are too high . Cash transfer . Transfer of affect people to safe emergency) . No work opportunity market . No internet . Local people support . Voucher place . Agriculture . Potable water . First Aid Kits . WFP . Accessible . Livestock . Enable access to seeds . Area is secure After Disaster . No income from own . Seeds . FAO . Less food available . Seeds . Handcraft and fertilizer . accessible (Recovery or production . Fodder . ANDMA . Prices are high . Fodder . Increase access to . Phone accessible . Crop . No work opportunity . CFF . Donor agencies . Cash . FFW Rehabilitation) business . No internet . Business . FFW . NGOs . Voucher . Gardening . Cash grant . Government

Province: Herat Zone: (Medium) Districts: Rubat Sangi, Pashtoon Zarghon, Kashk Kohna

For each response option, Market dynamics Livelihood Key issues to be Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the favour Response Phases Impact on livelihood Component addressed options secure? capacity to respond at cash/vouchers or in Recommendation scale? kind . Creation of volunteers committees . Livestock . WFP . Early Warning system . Area is secure . Accessible . Handcraft . loss of livelihood . Protect crops from flood . FAO . NFI Kits Before Disaster . Food storage . Accessible . Food available . Crop . No income from own impact. . ARCS . Protection wall . NFI kit . Phone available . Prices are not high (Mitigation) production . Awareness raising . DAIL . Potable water . Business . Protection wall . Internet available . Voucher . ANDMA . Gardening . First Aid kits . Potable water

. loss of livelihood . Support purchasing and . Area is secure . ANDMA During Disaster . Food distribution . Accessible . No income from own income level . accessible . WFP . Food distribution (1st phase . Livestock . Cash transfer . No enough Food available production . Increase accessibility to . Phone accessible . FAO . Cash transfer . Agencies contribution . Transfer of affect people to safe . Prices are too high emergency) . No work opportunity market . No internet . Local people support place . Potable water . Agriculture . WFP . First Aid Kits . Livestock . Enable access to seeds . Area is secure . FAO . Accessible some not . Seeds After Disaster . No income from own . Seeds . Handcraft and fertilizer . accessible . ANDMA . Less food available . Fodder (Recovery or production . Fodder . Increase access to . Phone accessible . Donor agencies . Prices are high . FFW . Crop . No work opportunity . CFF Rehabilitation) business . No internet . NGOs . Cash . First Aid Kits . Business . FFW . Government . Gardening . Cash grant

Province: Herat Zone: (Low) District: Ghoryan, Adraskan, Kahan, Awoba, Guzara, Enjel, Shendand

For each response option, Market dynamics Livelihood Key issues to be Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the favour Response Phases Impact on livelihood Component addressed options secure? capacity to respond at cash/vouchers or in Recommendation scale? kind . Creation of volunteers committees . Livestock . WFP . Early Warning system . Area is secure . Accessible . Handcraft . loss of livelihood . Protect crops from . FAO . NFI Kits Before Disaster . Food storage . Accessible . Food available . Crop . No income from own flood impact. . ARCS . Protection wall . NFI kit . Phone available . Prices are not high (Mitigation) production . Awareness raising . DAIL . Potable water . Business . Protection wall . Internet available . Voucher . ANDMA . Gardening . First Aid kits . Potable water . loss of livelihood . Support purchasing and . Food distribution . Area is secure . ANDMA During Disaster . Accessible . Livestock . No income from own income level . Cash transfer . accessible . WFP . Food distribution (1st phase . No enough Food available . Agencies contribution production . Increase accessibility to . Transfer of affect people to safe . Phone accessible . FAO . Cash transfer . Prices are too high emergency) . No work opportunity market place . No internet . Local people support . Potable water . Agriculture . WFP . First Aid Kits . Livestock . Enable access to seeds . Area is secure . FAO . Accessible some not After Disaster . No income from own . Seeds . Seeds . Handcraft and fertilizer . accessible . ANDMA . Less food available (Recovery or production . Fodder . Fodder . Increase access to . Phone accessible . Donor agencies . Prices are high . Crop . No work opportunity . CFF . FFW Rehabilitation) business . No internet . NGOs . Cash . Business . FFW . Government . Gardening . Cash grant

Province: Ghor Zone: (High) Districts: Shahrak, Tolak, Saghar, Taiwara, Pasaband, Charsada Date: 3 April 2012

For each response option, Market dynamics Livelihood Key issues to be Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the favour Response Phases Impact on livelihood Component addressed options secure? capacity to respond at cash/vouchers or in Recommendation scale? kind . Creation of volunteers committees . WFP . Livestock . Protect crops from . Early Warning system . loss of livelihood . Partially is secure . ACF . Access to market . Early Warning system . Agriculture flood impact. . Protection wall Before Disaster . No income from own . Accessible . ANDMA . Food available . Food storage . Gardening . Awareness raising . Food storage production . Phone available . ARCS . Prices are high . DRR (Mitigation) . Tree plantation against . Tree plantation . Daily wage . less food . No internet . Government . Voucher . NFI Kit risk . Avoid forest cutting . Shopkeeper . FAO . DRR . NFI Kit . Food distribution . WFP . loss of livelihood . Source at hand . Support purchasing and . Cash transfer . Area is not secure . ACF . Access to market . Food distribution During Disaster . No income from own . Loans income level . Transfer of affect people to safe . No accessible . ANDMA . No enough Food available . Medication (1st phase production . Environmental . Increase accessibility to place . Phone accessible . ARCS . Prices are too high . Potable water . No work opportunity emergency) market . Fodder . No internet . Government . Cash . Fodder assistance . Migration . Medication . FAO . Seeds . WFP . Seeds . No income from own . Enable access to seeds . CFF . Area is not secure . ACF . Possible Accessible After Disaster . Agriculture . Irrigation Canal production and fertilizer . FFW . Partially accessible . ANDMA . Food available (Recovery or . Livestock construction . less work opportunity . Increase access to . Cash grant . Phone accessible . ARCS . Prices are high . Shelter Rehabilitation) . Daily wage business . Fertilizer . No internet . Government . Voucher . CFW . Construction projects . FAO

Province: Ghor Zone: (Medium) Districts: Du layan, , Dawlat Yar, Lal

For each response option, Market dynamics Livelihood Key issues to be Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the favour Response Phases Impact on livelihood Component addressed options secure? capacity to respond at cash/vouchers or in Recommendation scale? kind . Creation of volunteers committees . Early Warning system . WFP . Livestock . Protect crops from . loss of livelihood . Protection wall . Partially is secure . ACF . Access to market . Agriculture flood impact. Before Disaster . No income from own . Food storage . Accessible . ANDMA . Food available . Early Warning system . Gardening . Awareness raising production . Tree plantation . Phone available . ARCS . Prices are high . Protection of green area (Mitigation) . Tree plantation against . Daily wage . less food . Avoid forest cutting . No internet . Government . Voucher risk . Shopkeeper . DRR . FAO . NFI Kit . Green area . WFP . loss of livelihood . Source at hand . Support purchasing and . Food distribution . Area is not secure . ACF . Access to market During Disaster . No income from own . Loans income level . Cash transfer . No accessible . ANDMA . No enough Food available . Food distribution (1st phase production . Environmental . Increase accessibility to . Medication . Phone accessible . ARCS . Prices are too high . shelter . No work opportunity emergency) market . shelter . No internet . Government . Cash assistance . Migration . FAO . Seeds . WFP . Enable access to seeds . CFF . Area is not secure . ACF . Possible Accessible After Disaster . Agriculture . No income from own and fertilizer . FFW . Partially accessible . ANDMA . Food available . Seeds (Recovery or . Livestock production . Increase access to . Cash grant . Phone accessible . ARCS . Prices are high . CFW . less work opportunity Rehabilitation) . Daily wage business . Fertilizer . No internet . Government . Voucher . Construction projects . FAO

Province: Ghor Zone: (Low) District: Du layan, Chaghcharan, Dawlat Yar, Lal

For each response option, Market dynamics Livelihood Key issues to be Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the favour Response Phases Impact on livelihood Component addressed options secure? capacity to respond at cash/vouchers or in Recommendation scale? kind

. Creation of volunteers committees . Early Warning system . WFP . Livestock . Protect crops from . loss of livelihood . Protection wall . Partially is secure . ACF . Access to market . Agriculture flood impact. Before Disaster . No income from own . Food storage . Accessible . ANDMA . Food available . Early Warning system . Gardening . Awareness raising production . Tree plantation . Phone available . ARCS . Prices are high . Protection of green area (Mitigation) . Tree plantation against . Daily wage . less food . Avoid forest cutting . No internet . Government . Voucher risk . Shopkeeper . DRR . FAO . NFI Kit . Green area . WFP . ACF . loss of livelihood . Source at hand . Support purchasing and . Food distribution . Area is not secure . ANDMA . Access to market During Disaster . No income from own . Loans income level . Cash transfer . No accessible . ARCS . No enough Food available . Food distribution (1st phase production . Environmental . Increase accessibility to . Medication . Phone accessible . Government . Prices are too high . shelter . No work opportunity emergency) market . shelter . No internet . FAO . Cash assistance . Migration . Afghan Aid . CRS

. Seeds . WFP . Enable access to seeds . CFF . Area is not secure . ACF . Possible Accessible After Disaster . Agriculture . No income from own and fertilizer . FFW . Partially accessible . ANDMA . Food available . Seeds (Recovery or . Livestock production . Increase access to . Cash grant . Phone accessible . ARCS . Prices are high . CFW . less work opportunity Rehabilitation) . Daily wage business . Fertilizer . No internet . Government . Voucher . Construction projects . FAO

Province: Badghis Zone: (High) Districts: Qalai Now, Qadis, Marghab

For each response option, Market dynamics Livelihood Key issues to be Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the favour Response Phases Impact on livelihood Component addressed options secure? capacity to respond at cash/vouchers or in Recommendation scale? kind

. Creation of volunteers committees Before Disaster . Area is secure . Accessible . Livestock . loss of livelihood . Early Warning system (Mitigation) . Protect crops from . Accessible . WFP . Food available . Food storage . Daily wage . No income from own . Food storage flood impact. . Phone available . FAO . Prices are not high . NFI storage production . NFI kit storage . Handcraft . Awareness raising . Internet available . ANDMA . Voucher . Protection wall . Protection wall . Crop

. Rescue committee by the During Disaster . Not accessible st . loss of livelihood . Food distribution government (1 phase . Support purchasing and . Area is secure . Food not available . Food distribution . Livestock . No income from own . Cash transfer . ANDMA emergency) income level . Not accessible . Prices are too high . Cash transfer . Daily wage production . Transfer of affect people to safe . WFP . Increase accessibility to . Phone accessible . Kind . Agencies contribution . No work opportunity place . FAO market

. Potable water . Shelter . Agriculture . No income from own . Medical assistance . Seeds After Disaster . Livestock production . some parts of accessible . Shelter . Area is secure . Fodder (Recovery or . Daily wage . No work opportunity some not . Seeds . Phone available . WFP . CFF Rehabilitation) . less food available . Handcraft . Enable access to seeds . Fodder .Partially accessible . FAO . FFW . Prices are high . CFF . ANDMA . Cash grant . Cash . FFW

. Cash grant

Province: Badghis Zone: (Medium) Districts: Jawan, Abger

For each response option, Market dynamics Livelihood Key issues to be Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the favour Response Phases Impact on livelihood Component addressed options secure? capacity to respond at cash/vouchers or in Recommendation scale? kind

. Creation of volunteers committees . Livestock . Area is secure . Accessible . loss of livelihood . Protect crops from . Early Warning system . WFP . Food storage Before Disaster . Daily wage . Accessible . Food available . No income from own flood impact. . Food storage . FAO . NFI storage . Phone available . Prices are not high (Mitigation) . Handcraft production . Awareness raising . NFI kit storage . ANDMA . Protection wall . Internet available . Voucher . Crop . Protection wall

. Rescue committee by the . loss of livelihood . Support purchasing and . Food distribution . Not accessible During Disaster . Livestock . Area is secure government . No income from own income level . Cash transfer . Food not available . Food distribution (1st phase . Daily wage . Not accessible . ANDMA production . Increase accessibility to . Transfer of affect people to safe . Prices are too high . Cash transfer . Agencies contribution . Phone accessible . WFP emergency) . No work opportunity market place . Kind . FAO

. Potable water . Medical assistance . Shelter . some parts of accessible . Agriculture . Shelter . Seeds After Disaster . No income from own . Area is secure . WFP some not . Livestock . Seeds . Fodder (Recovery or production . Enable access to seeds . Phone available . FAO . less food available . Fodder . CFF . Daily wage . No work opportunity .Partially accessible . ANDMA . Prices are high Rehabilitation) . CFF . FFW . Handcraft . Cash . FFW . Cash grant . Cash grant

Province: Badghis Zone: (Low) District: Maqar

For each response option, Market dynamics Livelihood Key issues to be Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the favour Response Phases Impact on livelihood Component addressed options secure? capacity to respond at cash/vouchers or in Recommendation scale? kind

. Creation of volunteers committees . Agriculture . Area is secure . Accessible . loss of livelihood . Protect crops from . Early Warning system . WFP . Food storage Before Disaster . Livestock . Accessible . Food available . No income from own flood impact. . Food storage . FAO . NFI storage . Phone available . Prices are not high (Mitigation) . Daily wage production . Awareness raising . NFI kit storage . ANDMA . Protection wall . Internet available . Voucher . Handcraft . Protection wall

. Rescue committee by the . loss of livelihood . Support purchasing and . Food distribution . Not accessible During Disaster . Livestock . Area is secure government . No income from own income level . Cash transfer . Food not available . Food distribution (1st phase . Daily wage . Not accessible . ANDMA production . Increase accessibility to . Transfer of affect people to safe . Prices are too high . Cash transfer . Agencies contribution . . Phone accessible . WFP emergency) . No work opportunity market place . Kind . FAO

. Potable water . Medical assistance . some parts of accessible Agriculture . Shelter . Seeds After Disaster . No income from own . Area is secure . WFP some not . Livestock . Seeds . Fodder (Recovery or production . Enable access to seeds . Phone available . FAO . less food available . Fodder . CFF . Daily wage . No work opportunity .Partially accessible . ANDMA . Prices are high Rehabilitation) . CFF . FFW . Handcraft . Cash . FFW . Cash grant

Province: Farah Zone: (High) Districts: Purchaman, Anar Dara

For each response option, Market dynamics Key issues to be Livelihood Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the favour Response Phases Impact on livelihood addressed Component options secure? capacity to respond at cash/vouchers or in Recommendation

scale? kind . Creation of volunteers committees . Early Warning system . WFP . loss of livelihood . centre of the district . No market . Livestock . Protect crops from . NFI kit . PRT Before Disaster . No income from own is secure . No enough Food available . Tree plantation . Agriculture flood impact. . Protection wall . ANDMA production . No Accessible . Prices are high . Early Warning system (Mitigation) . Awareness raising . First Aid kits . ARCS . Gardening . less food . Phone available . Cash . Food storage . Government . Tree plantation . Food distribution . Cash transfer . Food distribution . Transfer of affect people to safe . WFP . Medication . loss of livelihood . Support purchasing and place . Area is not secure . PRT . Accessible . Potable water During Disaster . Livestock . No income from own income level . Potable water . No accessible . ANDMA . No enough Food available . Fodder (1st phase . Agencies contribution production . Increase accessibility to . Fodder . Phone accessible . ARCS . Prices are too high . Shelter . Agriculture . No work opportunity emergency) market . Shelter . No internet . Government . Voucher . Protection wall . Food high prices . Livestock . FAO . Livestock . NFI kit . NFI Kit . Medication . Seeds . Seeds . CFF . WFP . Irrigation Canal . Enable access to seeds . FFW . Area is not secure . PRT . Possible Accessible construction After Disaster . Agriculture . No income from own and fertilizer . Cash grant . No accessible . ANDMA . Less food available . Reinforcing river banks (Recovery or . Livestock production . Increase access to . Canal construction . Phone accessible . ARCS . Prices are high . Protecting agriculture lands . less work opportunity Rehabilitation) . Daily wage business . Reinforcing river banks . No internet . Government . Voucher . Cash Transfer . Protecting agriculture lands . FAO . Cash Transfer

Province: Farah Zone: (Medium) Districts: Shebkoh, Gulistan, Balabolok, Markaz Farah, Khaksafed, Pusht Koh Qalai Ka

For each response option, Market dynamics Livelihood Key issues to be Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the favour Response Phases Impact on livelihood Component addressed options secure? capacity to respond at cash/vouchers or in Recommendation scale? kind

. Creation of volunteers committees . Early Warning system . WFP . loss of livelihood . centre of the district . No market . Livestock . Protect crops from . NFI kit . PRT Before Disaster . No income from own is secure . No enough Food available . Agriculture flood impact. . Protection wall . ANDMA . Tree plantation production . No Accessible . Prices are high (Mitigation) . Awareness raising . First Aid kits . ARCS . Gardening . less food . Phone available . Cash . Food storage . Government . Tree plantation

. Food distribution . WFP . loss of livelihood . Support purchasing and . Cash transfer . Area is not secure . PRT . Accessible During Disaster . Livestock . No income from own . Food distribution income level . Potable water . No accessible . ANDMA . No enough Food available (1st phase . Agencies contribution production . NFI Kit . Increase accessibility to . Fodder . Phone accessible . ARCS . Prices are too high . Agriculture . No work opportunity . Shelter emergency) market . Shelter . No internet . Government . Voucher . Food high prices . Livestock . FAO . Seeds . CFF . WFP . FFW . Enable access to seeds . Area is not secure . PRT . Possible Accessible After Disaster . Agriculture . No income from own . Cash grant and fertilizer . No accessible . ANDMA . Less food available . Cash Transfer (Recovery or . Livestock production . Food distribution . Increase access to . Phone accessible . ARCS . Prices are high . Seeds . less work opportunity . Canal construction Rehabilitation) . Daily wage business . No internet . Government . Voucher . Reinforcing river banks . FAO . Protecting agriculture lands . Cash Transfer

Province: Farah Zone: (Low) District: Bakwa, Lash juween

For each response option, Market dynamics Response Livelihood Key issues to be Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the favour Recommendation Phases Impact on livelihood Component addressed options secure? capacity to respond at cash/vouchers or in scale? kind . Creation of volunteers committees . Early Warning system . WFP . loss of livelihood . centre of the district . No market . Livestock . Protect crops from . NFI kit . PRT Before Disaster . No income from own is secure . No enough Food available . Agriculture flood impact. . Protection wall . ANDMA . Tree plantation production . No Accessible . Prices are high (Mitigation) . Awareness raising . First Aid kits . ARCS . Gardening . less food . Phone available . Cash . Food storage . Government . Tree plantation . Food distribution . WFP . loss of livelihood . Support purchasing and . Cash transfer . Area is not secure . PRT . Accessible During Disaster . Livestock . No income from own income level . Potable water . No accessible . ANDMA . No enough Food available (1st phase . Agencies contribution production . Food distribution . Increase accessibility to . Fodder . Phone accessible . ARCS . Prices are too high . Agriculture . No work opportunity emergency) market . Shelter . No internet . Government . Voucher . Food high prices . Livestock . FAO

. Seeds . WFP . CFF . Enable access to seeds . Area is not secure . PRT . Possible Accessible After Disaster . Agriculture . No income from own . FFW and fertilizer . No accessible . ANDMA . Less food available . Cash Transfer (Recovery or . Livestock production . Cash grant . Increase access to . Phone accessible . ARCS . Prices are high . Seeds . less work opportunity banks Rehabilitation) . Daily wage business . No internet . Government . Voucher . Protecting agriculture lands . FAO . Cash Transfer

4.1. Northern Region

Do agencies have the capacity to Market dynamics favour cash/voucher or Province Flood zone District Is the area is secure? Responses recommended response at scale? in kind.

Pre-Disaster Solidarity (small), ARCS(small) Afghan Aid (medium) Early warning group Mitigation Project Post-Disaster Protection wall Helvetas ( water sheet management) Canal rehabilitation No security problem. Solidarity (NSP emergency assessment) NFI. CFW Seed distribution Zone -1 Royi Doab Difficult access during rainfall UNOPS (Access-Road clearance) FFW Seedling plantation FAO-seed distribution Samangan DAIL-seed distribution. Reforesting WFP? Early Warning system development, NRM and Water sheet management IOM –NFI-assessment advocacy. ARCS -NFI

Zone-2 -e-Suf Nil Nil Nil Nil

Khuram Wa Sarbagh Nil Nil Nil Nil Zone-3 Pre-disaster Garzewan Save the Children ,ACTED, WFP, NRC, MRRD, Balcheragh Food DAIL, ARCS, ANDMA The existing market has the capacity of 20% Pashtoonkot Yes NFI Post-disaster response Zone -1 Khowajasubzpoosh FFW All NGOs according to their capacity. Sherentagab Coordination has the ability to response. Faryab Maimana city Pre-disaster: DoRR, PVA, PCA, PADR. Area is relatively secure, only road Almar Post-disaster: All NGOs according to their FFW Zone-2 access to Kohistan district is closed The existing market has the capacity of response Qaisar capacity. CFW since six months. Kohistan Coordination has the ability to response. Qaramqol Pre-disaster: DoRR, PVA, PCA, PADR. Andkhoi Security is good except Ghormach Post-disaster: All NGOs according to their Zone-3 Market in Ankhoi is ok and in other districts is no. FFW Khan Charbagh district capacity. Ghormach Coordination has the ability to response.

Pre-disaster: AAA, SVC, WFP, IOM, Johaniter, Food, Shelter, IGA, MEI program NRC, ARCS, ANDMA There is no market in Good coordination, identifying beneficiaries, & DRR, need assessment of Zone-1 Shortepa & Kaldar Secure and accessible community, conducted FA training . Food, NFI, medical treatment, capacity Post-disaster: AAA, SVC, WFP, IOM, Johaniter, Market is good in building, DRR. NRC, ARCS, ANDMA Chimtal Balkh ICRC & ARCS has access to insecure areas, potential actor available to access in Kishindih Chimtal is insecure at some level the Zone-2 Pre-disaster: ACTED, PIN, ICRC, ARCS, BDN Market is available with good capacity. this area. Zari remaining is ok. CFW, FFW, Cash for training, IGA Sholgara

Pre-disaster: Johanniter, GTZ, ACTED, ADEO, Zone-3 Nahri Shahi, Khulum Both districts are secure Sufficient market is available CFW, FFW, Voucher, IGA, ARCS, SRP, ICRC, WFP, CHA, Save the children

No good market, necessary items should be Need funding for analysis and selection, storage construction for food & NFI, Zone-1 Sozma Qala Yes, all the roads are open Experience staff available, limited NFI imported to these districts road maintenance,

No good market, necessary items should be Need funding for analysis and selection, storage construction for food & NFI, Zone-2 Balkhab Yes, but roads are closed Experience staff available, limited NFI Saripul imported to these districts road maintenance, Sayad No enough security and all the roads No good market, necessary items should be Need funding for analysis and selection, storage construction for food & NFI. Zone-3 Kohistan Experience staff available, limited NFI are closed imported to these districts NGOs staff need security to do response analysis. Saripul

Shibirghan, Darzab, Qushtepa, Faizabad, Pre-disaster: many NGOs are working, DRR, Involving CDC, rapid need assessment, training to communities, ARCS Zone-1 Yes Good market capacity Aqcha, Mardyan, Kham Early warning system volunteer training, Early warning system, DRR. Ab, Qarian

On time attention to response Post disaster: rapid assessment, Food and NFI Jawzjan Avoid lots of paper works Zone-2 KhowaJa Du Koh Yes distribution, first aid kits, shelter, seeds, Good market UN-OCHA must coordinate and support NGOs, animal feed, advocacy Donor immediate response On time attention to response Post disaster: rapid assessment, Food and NFI Avoid lots of paper works Zone-3 Khaniqa Yes distribution, first aid kits, shelter, seeds, Good market UN-OCHA must coordinate and support NGOs, animal feed, advocacy Donor immediate response

4.2. Eastern Region

Province: Nangarhar Zone: (High) Districts :(Khogiani, Pachir wa Agam, Kot, Deh Bala, Achin, Surkhrod, Spin Ghar, Kama, Mohmandara, Beh Sud, Dari Noor, Kuz Kunar) Date: May 8, 2012

For each response option, Market dynamics Livelihood Key issues to be Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the Response Phases Impact on livelihood favour cash/vouchers Component addressed options secure? capacity to respond at Recommendation or in kind scale? . DRR . Livestock . Shortage of food items . Early warning . WFP . Crops . less income . Crops protection . Access to market . Forestry rehabilitation . Area is Secure . FAO . Early warning system . Business . Unemployment . employment . Commodities Before Disaster . Shelter . Mobile working . IOM . Forestry Rehabilitation . Agriculture . Disease spreading opportunity . Prices good . Discharge monitoring system . Accessible . ARCS . Check dams (Mitigation) . Transportation problems . Shelter . Voucher . Water resources . Food storage . No internet . IRC . Protection wall . Houseless . Communication system . Infrastructures . Check dams . NRC . No potable water . Daily wage . Protection wall . UNHCR . Food distribution . WFP . Food distribution . loss of assets . Transportation of . First Medical kits . FAO . Livestock . No Access to market . First Medical kits . No income affected HH to the safe . Potable water . Area is Secure . IOM During Disaster . Crops . No Commodities . Potable water . Unemployment place . Rescue committee . Mobile working . ARCS (1st phase . UN Assistances . Prices are high . Rescue committee . Shortage of food items . Rapid assessment . Doctors mobile team . Accessible . IRC . in kind . Cash transfer emergency) . Gov Assistances . Shortage of NFI . Deployment of . Cash transfer . Not internet . NRC . Cash . NFI kit . NGOs Assistances . No potable water emergency assistance . NFI kit . UNHCR . Fodder . No shelter . Fodder . ICRC . Seeds distribution . Fertilizer . No seeds for cultivation . Considering the . Irrigation system . Seeds distribution . Livestock . Loss of livestock irrigation system . CFW . Area is Secure . Irrigation system . FAO . Access to market After Disaster . Crops . No irrigation system . Agriculture . FFW partially . CFW . WFP . Commodities (Recovery or . UN Assistances . Houses damages improvements . Infrastructures . Mobile working . FFW . NRC . Prices are high . No potable water . Distribution of . Forestry rehabilitation . Partially Accessible . Cash grant Rehabilitation) . Gov Assistances . ARCS . Kind . NGOs Assistances . No fertilizer assistances . Cash grant . No internet . IGA tool kits . No income . IGA tool kits . Shelter . Shelter

Province: Nangarhar Zone: (Medium) Districts: (Hisarak, , Chaparhar, Nazian, Durbaba, Ghani Khil, Bati Kot)

For each response option, Market dynamics Livelihood Key issues to be Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the Response Phases Impact on livelihood favour cash/vouchers Component addressed options secure? capacity to respond at Recommendation or in kind scale? . DRR . Livestock . Shortage of food items . WFP . Early warning . Crops . less income . Crops protection . FAO . Forestry rehabilitation . Area is Secure . Access to market . Early warning system . Business . Unemployment . employment . IOM Before Disaster . Shelter . Mobile working . Commodities . Forestry Rehabilitation . Agriculture . Disease spreading opportunity . ARCS . Discharge monitoring system . Accessible . Prices good . Check dams (Mitigation) . Transportation problems . Shelter . IRC . Water resources . Food storage . No internet . Voucher . Protection wall . Houseless . Communication system . NRC . Infrastructures . Check dams . No potable water . UNHCR . Daily wage . Protection wall . Food distribution . WFP . loss of assets . Transportation of . First Medical kits . FAO . Food distribution . Livestock . No Access to market . No income affected HH to the safe . Potable water . Area is Secure . IOM . Potable water During Disaster . Crops . No Commodities . Unemployment place . Rescue committee . Mobile working . ARCS . Rescue committee (1st phase . UN Assistances . Prices are high . Shortage of food items . Rapid assessment . Doctors mobile team . Accessible . IRC . Cash transfer . in kind emergency) . Gov Assistances . Shortage of NFI . Deployment of . Cash transfer . Not internet . NRC . NFI kit . Cash . NGOs Assistances . No potable water emergency assistance . NFI kit . UNHCR . Fodder . No shelter . Fodder . ICRC . Seeds distribution . No seeds for cultivation . Fertilizer . Considering the . Seeds distribution . Livestock . Loss of livestock . Irrigation system . Area is Secure irrigation system . FAO . Access to market . Irrigation system After Disaster . Crops . No irrigation system . CFW partially . Agriculture . WFP . No Commodities . CFW (Recovery or . UN Assistances . Houses damages . FFW . Mobile working improvements . NRC . Prices are high . FFW . No potable water . Infrastructures . Partially Accessible Rehabilitation) . Gov Assistances . Distribution of . ARCS . Kind . IGA kit . No fertilizer . Forestry rehabilitation . No internet . NGOs Assistances assistances . Shelter . No income . IGA kit . Shelter

Province: Nangarhar Zone: (Low) District: (Ghoshta, Lal Pur)

For each response option, Market dynamics Livelihood Key issues to be Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the Response Phases Impact on livelihood favour cash/vouchers Component addressed options secure? capacity to respond at Recommendation or in kind scale? . Livestock . Shortage of food items . DRR . WFP . Crops . less income . Crops protection . Early warning . FAO . Area is Secure . Access to market . Business . Unemployment . employment . Forestry rehabilitation . IOM . Early warning system Before Disaster . Mobile working . Commodities . Agriculture . Disease spreading opportunity . Shelter . ARCS . Forestry Rehabilitation . Accessible . Prices good (Mitigation) . Transportation problems . Shelter . Food storage . IRC . Protection wall . Water resources . No internet . Voucher . Infrastructures . Houseless . Communication system . Check dams . NRC . Daily wage . No potable water . Protection wall . UNHCR . Food distribution . WFP . loss of assets .Transportation of . Shelter . FAO . Livestock . No income . Area is Secure . No Access to market affected HH to the safe . First Medical kits . IOM . Food distribution During Disaster . Crops . Unemployment . Mobile working . No Commodities place . Potable water . ARCS . Rescue committee (1st phase . UN Assistances . Shortage of food items . Accessible . Prices are high . Rapid assessment . Rescue committee . IRC . Cash transfer . Shortage of NFI . Not internet . in kind emergency) . Gov Assistances .Deployment of . Doctors mobile team . NRC . NFI kit . No potable water . Cash . NGOs Assistances emergency assistance . Cash transfer . UNHCR . No shelter . NFI kit . ICRC . No seeds for cultivation . Seeds distribution . Considering the . Livestock . Loss of livestock . Fertilizer irrigation system . Area is Secure . FAO . Access to market . Seeds distribution After Disaster . Crops . No irrigation system . Irrigation system . Agriculture . Mobile working . WFP . No Commodities . Cash grant (Recovery or . UN Assistances . Houses damages . CFW improvements . Accessible . NRC . Prices are high . CFW . No potable water . FFW Rehabilitation) . Gov Assistances . Distribution of . No internet . ARCS . Kind . FFW . No fertilizer . Infrastructures . NGOs Assistances assistances . No income . Forestry rehabilitation Province: Laghman Zone: (High) Districts: (Alishang – Mihtarlam – Qarghayee) Date: 8 May 2012

For each response option, Market dynamics Livelihood Key issues to be Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the Response Phases Impact on livelihood favour cash/vouchers Component addressed options secure? capacity to respond at Recommendation or in kind scale? . Shortage of food items . Early warning . Crops protection . less income . Forestry rehabilitation . ANDMA . Crops . employment . Area is Secure . Access to market . Early warning system . Unemployment . Shelter . ARCS Before Disaster . Livestock opportunity . Mobile working . Commodities . Check dams . Disease spreading . Food storage . IRC . Natural Resources . Shelter . Accessible . Prices good . Protection wall (Mitigation) . Transportation problems . Check dams . RRD . Daily wage . Communication system . No internet . Voucher . Food storage building . Houseless . Protection wall . DAIL . Awareness raising . No potable water . Pre-positioning . ANDMA . Food distribution . Food distribution . Crops . loss of assets . IRC . Transportation of . Rescue committee . Rescue committee . Livestock . No income . WFP . No Access to market affected HH to the safe . Cash transfer . Area is Secure . Cash transfer During Disaster . Natural Resources . Unemployment . RRD . No Commodities place . NFI kit . Mobile working . NFI kit (1st phase . Daily wage . Shortage of food items . UNHCR . Prices are high . Rapid assessment . Fodder . Accessible . Shelter . Loan . Shortage of NFI . IOM . in kind emergency) . Deployment of . Shelter . Not internet . First Medical Kit . Sources at hand . No potable water . ARCS . Cash emergency assistance . First Medical kit . Fodder . NGOs assistance . No shelter . DAIL . Potable water . Potable water . IFRC . No seeds for cultivation . Considering the . Seeds distribution . Crops . Loss of livestock irrigation system . Fertilizer . FAO . Seeds distribution . Area is Secure . Access to market After Disaster . Livestock . No irrigation system . Agriculture . Irrigation system . WFP . CFW . Mobile working . Commodities (Recovery or . Natural Resources . Houses damages improvements . CFW . DAIL . FFW . Accessible . Prices are high . Daily wage . No potable water . Distribution of . FFW . IOM . Infrastructures Rehabilitation) . No internet . Kind . NGOs assistance . No fertilizer assistances . Infrastructures . RRD . Cash grant . No income . Job opportunity . Cash grant

Province: Laghman Zone: (Medium) Districts: (Alingar)

For each response option, Market dynamics Livelihood Key issues to be Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the Response Phases Impact on livelihood favour cash/vouchers Component addressed options secure? capacity to respond at Recommendation or in kind scale? . Shortage of food items . Early warning . less income . Crops protection . Forestry rehabilitation . ANDMA . Crops . Area is Secure . Access to market . Early warning system . Unemployment . employment opportunity . Shelter . ARCS Before Disaster . Livestock . Mobile working . Commodities . Check dams . Disease spreading . Shelter . Food storage . IRC . Natural Resources . Accessible . Prices good . Protection wall (Mitigation) . Transportation problems . Communication system . Check dams . RRD . Daily wage . No internet . Voucher . Food storage building . Houseless . Awareness raising . Protection wall . DAIL . No potable water . Pre-positioning . ANDMA . Crops . loss of assets . Food distribution . IRC . Transportation of . Food distribution . Livestock . No income . Rescue committee . WFP . No Access to market affected HH to the safe . Area is Secure . Rescue committee st . Natural Resources . Unemployment . Cash transfer . RRD . No Commodities During Disaster (1 place . Mobile working . Cash transfer . Daily wage . Shortage of food items . NFI kit . UNHCR . Prices are high . Rapid assessment . Accessible . NFI kit phase emergency) . Loan . Shortage of NFI . Fodder . IOM . in kind . Deployment of . Not internet . Shelter . Sources at hand . No potable water . Shelter . ARCS . Cash emergency assistance . First Medical Kit . NGOs assistance . No shelter . First Medical kit . DAIL . IFRC . No seeds for cultivation . Considering the irrigation . Seeds distribution . Crops . Loss of livestock system . Fertilizer . FAO . Seeds distribution . Area is Secure . Access to market After Disaster . Livestock . No irrigation system . Agriculture . Irrigation system . WFP . CFW . Mobile working . Commodities (Recovery or . Natural Resources . Houses damages improvements . CFW . DAIL . FFW . Accessible . Prices are high . Daily wage . No potable water . Distribution of . FFW . IOM . Infrastructures Rehabilitation) . No internet . Kind . NGOs assistance . No fertilizer assistances . Infrastructures . RRD . Cash grant . No income . Job opportunity . Cash grant

Province: Laghman Zone: (Low) District: (Dawlatshah)

For each response option, Market dynamics Livelihood Key issues to be Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the Response Phases Impact on livelihood favour cash/vouchers Component addressed options secure? capacity to respond at Recommendation or in kind scale? . Shortage of food items . Early warning . less income . Crops protection . Forestry rehabilitation . ANDMA . Crops . Area is Secure . Access to market . Early warning system . Unemployment . employment opportunity . Shelter . ARCS Before Disaster . Livestock . Mobile working . Commodities . Check dams . Disease spreading . Shelter . Food storage . IRC . Natural Resources . Accessible . Prices good . Protection wall (Mitigation) . Transportation problems . Communication system . Check dams . RRD . Daily wage . No internet . Voucher . Food storage building . Houseless . Awareness raising . Protection wall . DAIL . No potable water . Pre-positioning . ANDMA . Crops . loss of assets . Food distribution . IRC . Transportation of . Livestock . No income . Rescue committee . WFP . No Access to market affected HH to the safe . Area is Secure During Disaster . Natural Resources . Unemployment . Cash transfer . RRD . No Commodities . Food distribution place . Mobile working (1st phase . Daily wage . Shortage of food items . NFI kit . UNHCR . Prices are high . Cash transfer . Rapid assessment . Accessible . Loan . Shortage of NFI . Fodder . IOM . in kind . NFI kit emergency) . Deployment of . Not internet . Sources at hand . No potable water . Shelter . ARCS . Cash emergency assistance . NGOs assistance . No shelter . First Medical kit . DAIL . IFRC

. No seeds for cultivation . Considering the irrigation . Seeds distribution . Crops . Loss of livestock system . Fertilizer . FAO . Seeds distribution . Area is Secure . Access to market After Disaster . Livestock . No irrigation system . Agriculture . Irrigation system . WFP . CFW . Mobile working . Commodities (Recovery or . Natural Resources . Houses damages improvements . CFW . DAIL . FFW . Accessible . Prices are high . Daily wage . No potable water . Distribution of . FFW . IOM . Infrastructures Rehabilitation) . No internet . Kind . NGOs assistance . No fertilizer assistances . Infrastructures . RRD . Cash grant . No income . Job opportunity . Cash grant

Province: Kunar Zone: (High) Districts: (Chapa Dara, Peach, Wata pur, Asmar, Naria, Chawkay, Dangam)

For each response option, Market dynamics Livelihood Key issues to be Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the favour Response Phases Impact on livelihood Component addressed options secure? capacity to respond at cash/vouchers or in Recommendation scale? kind . Shortage of food items . less income . Early warning . Unemployment . Crops protection . Forestry rehabilitation . PRT . Agriculture . Area is Secure . Access to market . Protection wall . Disease spreading . employment opportunity . Food storage . FAO Before Disaster . Crops . Mobile working . Commodities . Check dams . Transportation problems . Shelter . Check dams . DAIL . Livestock . Accessible . Prices good . Food storage (Mitigation) . Houseless . Communication system . Protection wall . RRD . Business . No internet . Voucher . Early warning . loss of livestock . Forests protection . improving agriculture . USAID . loss of crops . Fertilizer . loss of business . Shortage of food items . Food distribution . Food distribution . less income . Transportation of . Potable water . WHO . Shelter . Unemployment . No Access to market . Agriculture affected HH to the safe . Doctors mobile team . Area is Secure . WFP . NFI kit During Disaster . Disease spreading . No Commodities . Crops place . Cash transfer . Mobile working . ARCS . Potable water (1st phase . Transportation problems . Prices are high . Livestock . Rapid assessment . NFI kit . Accessible . IOM . Doctors mobile team . Houseless . in kind emergency) . Business . Deployment of . Fodder . No internet . RRD . Rescue committee . loss of livestock . Cash emergency assistance . Shelter . UNHCR . Fodder . loss of crops . Rescue committee . Cash transfer . loss of business . Shortage of food items . Seeds distribution . WHO . less income . Fertilizer . Considering the irrigation . WFP . Seeds distribution . Unemployment . CFW . Agriculture system . Area is Secure . ARCS . Access to market . CFW After Disaster . Disease spreading . FFW . Crops . Agriculture . Mobile working . IOM . Commodities . FFW (Recovery or . Transportation problems . Infrastructures . Livestock improvements . Accessible . RRD . Prices are high . Cash grant . Houseless . Forestry rehabilitation Rehabilitation) . Business . Distribution of . No internet . UNHCR . Kind . Fertilizer . loss of livestock . Cash grant assistances . USAID . Business . loss of crops . IGA tool kits . PRT . loss of business . Business

Province: Kunar Zone: (Medium) Districts: (Nurgal, Sarkani, Khas Kunar, Narang, Marawara, Shigal, Ghazi Abad)

For each response option, Market dynamics Livelihood Key issues to be Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the favour Response Phases Impact on livelihood Component addressed options secure? capacity to respond at cash/vouchers or in Recommendation scale? kind . Shortage of food items . less income . Early warning . Unemployment . Crops protection . Forestry rehabilitation . PRT . Agriculture . Area is Secure . Access to market . Protection wall . Disease spreading . employment opportunity . Food storage . FAO Before Disaster . Crops . Mobile working . Commodities . Check dams . Transportation problems . Shelter . Check dams . DAIL . Livestock . Accessible . Prices good . Food storage (Mitigation) . Houseless . Communication system . Protection wall . RRD . Business . No internet . Voucher . Early warning . loss of livestock . Forests protection . improving agriculture . USAID . loss of crops . Fertilizer . loss of business . Shortage of food items . Food distribution . less income . Transportation of . Potable water . WHO . Food distribution . Unemployment . No Access to market . Agriculture affected HH to the safe . Doctors mobile team . Area is Secure . WFP . Shelter During Disaster . Disease spreading . No Commodities . Crops place . Cash transfer . Mobile working . ARCS . NFI kit (1st phase . Transportation problems . Prices are high . Livestock . Rapid assessment . NFI kit . Accessible . IOM . Potable water . Houseless . in kind emergency) . Business . Deployment of . Fodder . No internet . RRD . Doctors mobile team . loss of livestock . Cash emergency assistance . Shelter . UNHCR . Rescue committee . loss of crops . Rescue committee . loss of business . Shortage of food items . Seeds distribution . WHO . less income . Fertilizer . Considering the irrigation . WFP . Seeds distribution . Unemployment . CFW . Agriculture system . Area is Secure . ARCS . Access to market . CFW After Disaster . Disease spreading . FFW . Crops . Agriculture . Mobile working . IOM . Commodities . FFW (Recovery or . Transportation problems . Infrastructures . Livestock improvements . Accessible . RRD . Prices are high . Cash grant . Houseless . Forestry rehabilitation Rehabilitation) . Business . Distribution of . No internet . UNHCR . Kind . Fertilizer . loss of livestock . Cash grant assistances . USAID . Opening of closed roads . loss of crops . IGA tool kits . PRT . loss of business . Opening of closed roads

Province: Kunar Zone: (Low) District: (Asad Abad center of )

For each response option, Market dynamics Livelihood Key issues to be Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the favour Response Phases Impact on livelihood Component addressed options secure? capacity to respond at cash/vouchers or in Recommendation scale? kind . Shortage of food items . less income . Early warning

. Unemployment . Forestry rehabilitation . PRT . Agriculture . Crops protection . Area is Secure . Access to market . Disease spreading . Food storage . FAO . Protection wall Before Disaster . Crops . employment opportunity . Mobile working . Commodities . Transportation problems . Check dams . DAIL . Check dams . Livestock . Shelter . Accessible . Prices good (Mitigation) . Houseless . Protection wall . RRD . Early warning . Business . Communication system . No internet . Voucher . loss of livestock . improving agriculture . USAID . Forests protection . loss of crops . Fertilizer . loss of business . Food distribution . Shortage of food items . Transportation of . Potable water . WHO . less income . No Access to market . Agriculture affected HH to the safe . Doctors mobile team . Area is Secure . WFP During Disaster . Unemployment . No Commodities . Food distribution . Crops place . Cash transfer . Mobile working . ARCS (1st phase . Disease spreading . Prices are high . Shelter . Livestock . Rapid assessment . NFI kit . Accessible . IOM . Transportation problems . in kind . NFI kit emergency) . Business . Deployment of . Fodder . No internet . RRD . loss of crops . Cash emergency assistance . Shelter . UNHCR . loss of business . Rescue committee

. Seeds distribution . WHO . Shortage of food items . Considering the irrigation . Fertilizer . WFP . Seeds distribution After Disaster . Agriculture . less income system . CFW . Area is Secure . ARCS . Access to market . CFW . Crops . Unemployment . Agriculture . FFW . Mobile working . IOM . Commodities . FFW (Recovery or . Livestock . Disease spreading improvements . Infrastructures . Accessible . RRD . Prices are high . Cash grant Rehabilitation) . Business . Transportation problems . Distribution of . Forestry rehabilitation . No internet . UNHCR . Kind . Fertilizer . loss of crops assistances . Cash grant . USAID . Forestry rehabilitation . IGA tool kits . PRT

Province: Nuristan Zone: (High) Districts : (Noorgaram, Waigal, Kamdish)

For each response option, Market dynamics Livelihood Key issues to be Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the favour Response Phases Impact on livelihood Component addressed options secure? capacity to respond at cash/vouchers or in Recommendation scale? kind . Shortage of food items . less income . Early warning . Unemployment . Crops protection . Forestry rehabilitation . Area relatively is . Agriculture . Early warning . Disease spreading . employment opportunity . Food storage Secure . Livestock . Food storage Before Disaster . Transportation problems . Communication system . Trees plantation . Mobile working . No humanitarian agencies in this . No market . Gardening . Protection wall . Houseless . Forests protection . Protection wall partially stage . Kind (Mitigation) . Forestry . Road construction . loss of livestock . reinforcement of . improving agriculture . Accessible . Crops . Trees plantation . loss of crops irrigation system . Gardens protection . No internet . loss of irrigation system . Road construction

. Shortage of food items . less income . Food distribution . Agriculture . Unemployment . Transportation of . Potable water . Area relatively is . IOM . Livestock . Disease spreading affected HH to the safe . Doctors mobile team Secure . WFP . Food distribution During Disaster . No market . Gardening . Transportation problems place . Cash transfer . Mobile working . ANDMA . NFI kit (1st phase . Kind . Forestry . Houseless . Rapid assessment . NFI kit partially . DRRD . Shelter . Cash emergency) . Crops . loss of livestock . Deployment of . Fodder . Accessible . ICRC . Cash transfer . Government assistance . loss of crops emergency assistance . Shelter . No internet . ARCS . loss of irrigation system . Rescue committee . loss of people . Seeds distribution . Shortage of food items . IOM . Fertilizer . less income . WFP . Considering the irrigation . CFW . Area relatively is . Seeds distribution . Agriculture . Unemployment . ANDMA system . FFW Secure . CFW After Disaster . Livestock . Disease spreading . DRRD . No market . Agriculture . Infrastructures . Mobile working . FFW (Recovery or . Gardening . Transportation problems . ICRC . Kind improvements . Forestry rehabilitation partially . Livestock . Forestry . Houseless . ARCS . Voucher Rehabilitation) . Distribution of . Cash grant . Accessible . Forestry rehabilitation . Crops . loss of livestock . DAIL assistances . IGA tool kits . No internet . Gardening . loss of crops . FAO . Livestock . loss of irrigation system . IFHOPE . Gardening

Province: Nuristan Zone: (Medium) Districts: (Dowab, Mandol, Wama)

For each response option, Market dynamics Livelihood Key issues to be Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the Response Phases Impact on livelihood favor cash/vouchers Component addressed options secure? capacity to respond at Recommendation or in kind scale? . Shortage of food items . Early warning . less income . Crops protection . Forestry rehabilitation . Agriculture . Unemployment . Area is not secure . Early warning . employment opportunity . Food storage . Livestock . Disease spreading . No access . Food storage Before Disaster . Communication system . Trees plantation . No humanitarian agencies in this . No market . Gardening . Transportation problems . Mobile working . Protection wall . Forests protection . Protection wall stage . Kind (Mitigation) . Forestry . Houseless partially . Road Construction . reinforcement of . improving agriculture . Crops . loss of livestock . No Internet . Trees plantation irrigation system . Gardens protection . loss of crops . Road construction . loss of irrigation system . Shortage of food items . less income . Food distribution . IOM . Agriculture . Unemployment . Transportation of . Potable water . Area is not secure . WFP . Livestock . Disease spreading affected HH to the safe . Doctors mobile team . Food distribution During Disaster . No access . ANDMA . No market . Gardening . Transportation problems place . Cash transfer . NFI kit (1st phase . Mobile working . DRRD . Kind . Forestry . Houseless . Rapid assessment . NFI kit . Shelter partially . ICRC . Cash emergency) . Crops . loss of livestock . Deployment of . Fodder . Cash transfer . No internet . ARCS . Government assistance . loss of crops emergency assistance . Shelter . DAIL . loss of irrigation system . Rescue committee . loss of people

. Shortage of food items . Seeds distribution . IOM . less income . Fertilizer . WFP . Considering the irrigation . Agriculture . Unemployment . CFW . Area is not secure . ANDMA . Seeds distribution system After Disaster . Livestock . Disease spreading . FFW . No access . DRRD . No market . CFW . Agriculture (Recovery or . Gardening . Transportation problems . Infrastructures . Mobile working . ICRC . Kind . FFW improvements . Forestry . Houseless . Forestry rehabilitation partially . ARCS . Voucher . Livestock Rehabilitation) . Distribution of . Crops . loss of livestock . Cash grant . No Internet . DAIL . Forestry rehabilitation assistances . loss of crops . IGA tool kits . FAO . loss of irrigation system . Livestock . IFHOPE

Province: Nuristan Zone: (Low) District :(Bargi Matal, Paroon)

For each response option, Market dynamics Livelihood Key issues to be Possible response Is the Area do agencies have the Response Phases Impact on livelihood favor cash/vouchers Component addressed options secure? capacity to respond at Recommendation or in kind scale?

. Shortage of food items . Early warning . less income . Crops protection . Forestry rehabilitation . Agriculture . Unemployment . employment opportunity . Food storage . Area is not secure . Livestock . Disease spreading . Early warning Before Disaster . Communication system . Trees plantation . No access . No humanitarian agencies in this . Gardening . Transportation problems . No market . Food storage . Forests protection . Protection wall . Mobile working stage (Mitigation) . Forestry . Houseless . Kind . Protection wall . reinforcement of . improving agriculture partially . Crops . loss of livestock irrigation system . Gardens protection . No Internet . loss of crops . Road construction . loss of irrigation system

. Shortage of food items . less income . Food distribution . IOM . Agriculture . Unemployment . Transportation of . Potable water . Area is not secure . WFP . Livestock . Disease spreading affected HH to the safe . Doctors mobile team . Food distribution During Disaster . No access . ANDMA . No market . Gardening . Transportation problems place . Cash transfer . NFI kit (1st phase . Mobile working . DRRD . Kind . Forestry . Houseless . Rapid assessment . NFI kit . Shelter partially . ICRC . Cash emergency) . Crops . loss of livestock . Deployment of . Fodder . Cash transfer . No internet . ARCS . Government assistance . loss of crops emergency assistance . Shelter . DAIL . loss of irrigation system . Rescue committee . loss of people After Disaster . Agriculture . Shortage of food items . Seeds distribution . Area is not secure . IOM . No market . Seeds distribution (Recovery or . Livestock . less income . Considering the irrigation . Fertilizer . No access . WFP . Kind . CFW Rehabilitation) . Gardening . Unemployment system . CFW . Mobile working . ANDMA . Voucher . FFW . Forestry . Disease spreading . Agriculture . FFW partially . DRRD . Livestock . Crops . Transportation problems improvements . Infrastructures . No Internet . ICRC . Road construction . Houseless . Distribution of . Forestry rehabilitation . ARCS . loss of livestock assistances . Cash grant . DAIL . loss of crops . IGA tool kits . FAO . loss of irrigation system . Livestock . IFHOPE . Road construction

APPENDIX V: Option for Mitigation and Priorities

5.1. Western Region

5.2. Northern Region

5.2. Easter Region

APENDIXE VI: Tables of response planning

6.1. Western Region

F2: Date: 4 April 2012 Zone Name of the province : Badghis

Priority response options (rank the three first Zone Zone Zone Zone 1 - potentially most flood Zone 2 - potentially medium flood affected Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected one) 1 2 3 affected

food distribution 1 1 1 Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario

food vouchers

seeds 2 2 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1

fodder/ animal feed Nb of people affected: 5000 Nb of people affected: 3000 Nb of people affected: 2300 agricultural tools Timeline to respond: 72 Hours Timeline to respond: 48 Hours Timeline to respond: 48 Hours Emergency (short Gov, WFP, term) restocking of livestock How to implement: How to implement: Gov, WFP, UNICEF How to implement: Gov, WFP, UNICEF UNICEF IGA tool kit Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience

cash grant 2 ANDAMA NPO/RAA ANDAMA NPO/RAA ANDAMA NPO/RAA

other 1:

other 2: Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community irrigation canals 4 50.000 USD 30,000 USD 23,000 USD agricultural land Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario reinforcement banks Rehabilitation construction of protection walls 3 Name of response: 2 Name of response: 2 Name of response: 2 (Medium term) Nb of people other 1: Shelter 3 5 4 Nb of people affected: 5000 Nb of people affected: 3000 1000 affected: other 2: Seeds 4 6 5 Timeline to respond: 48 Hours Timeline to respond: 48 Hours Timeline to respond: 48 Hours other 2: How to implement: NGOs How to implement: Gov, FAO How to implement: Gov, FAO early warning systems (what?) 5 6 Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Mitigation measures for planting trees NGOs, ANDMA Gov, NGOs Gov, NGOs future (Long other 1: Food Stock 6 7 Budget estimates / community Budget estimates /community Budget estimates / community term) other 2: 85,000 USD 21,000 USD 21,000 USD

F2: Date: 4 April 2012 Zone Name of the province : Herat

Priority response options (rank the three first Zone 2 - potentially medium flood Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 1 - potentially most flood affected Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected one) affected

food distribution 1 1 1 Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario food vouchers seeds 2 6 6 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1

fodder/ animal feed 3 7 5 Nb of people affected: 7000 Nb of people affected: 1200 Nb of people affected: 2000

agricultural tools Timeline to respond: 4 weeks Timeline to respond: 5 weeks Timeline to respond: 9 weeks Emergency (short term) restocking of livestock How to implement: Gov/NGOs/CDC How to implement: Gov/NGOs/CDC How to implement: Gov/NGOs/CDC

IGA tool kit Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience

cash grant 4 2 2 NGOs - ARCS ANDMA - ARCS ANDMA - ARCS

other 1: Potable water 5 3 3

other 2: Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community

irrigation canals 280000 USD 80000 USD 200000 USD

agricultural land Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario

reinforcement banks

construction of protection Rehabilitation (Medium 6 4 4 Name of response: 4 Name of response: 2 Name of response: 3 term) walls

other 1: FFW 7 8 8 Nb of people affected: 12000 Nb of people affected: 600 Nb of people affected: 150

other 2: Food Storage 8 Timeline to respond: 2 weeks Timeline to respond: 5 Weeks Timeline to respond: 3 Months

other 2: Medical Kit 9 How to implement: Gov/NGOs/CDC How to implement: CDC How to implement: CDS

early warning systems (what?) Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience

Mitigation measures for planting trees ARCS - ANDMA - MRRD ARCS ARCS - CDC - WHO - WFP future (Long term) other 1: Food Stock 9 Budget estimates / community Budget estimates /community Budget estimates / community

other 2: NFI Kit 10 5 7 1000000 USD 40000 USD 100000 USD

F2: Date: 4 April 2012 Zone Name of the province : Farah

Priority response options (rank the three first Zone 1 - potentially most flood Zone 2 - potentially medium flood Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected one) affected affected

food distribution 1 1 1 Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario

food vouchers

seeds Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1

fodder/ animal feed 3 Nb of people affected: 6000 Nb of people affected: 18000 Nb of people affected: 3000

agricultural tools Timeline to respond: 2 weeks Timeline to respond: 20 Days Timeline to respond: 1 week Emergency (short term) restocking of livestock 7 How to implement: NGOs - CDC How to implement: NGOs - CDC How to implement: NGOs - CDC

IGA tool kit 4 Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience

cash grant 10 ARCS WFP - ANDMA - FAO - UNHCR ARCS WFP - FAO - ANDMA - UNHCR WFP - ARCS - FAO other 1: NFI Kit 2 3 other 2: Medication 5 Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community irrigation canals 9 60000 USD 40000 USD agricultural land 12 Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario reinforcement banks 13 construction of protection 4 Name of response: 8 Name of response: 5 Name of response: 2 Rehabilitation (Medium walls term) other 1: Shelter 8 2 Nb of people affected: 1800 Nb of people affected: 12000 Nb of people affected: 3000

other 2: Seeds 11 5 2 Timeline to respond: 2 weeks Timeline to respond: 15 Days Timeline to respond: 1 weel

other 2: Potable water 6 How to implement: ARCS How to implement: NGOs - CDC How to implement: NGOs - CDC early warning systems (what?) 14 Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience planting trees 15 6 UNHCR - ARCS - IFRC - ICRC FAO - CHA - ADA - ARCS FAO - CHA - ADA - ARCS Mitigation measures for future (Long term) other 1: Budget estimates / community Budget estimates /community Budget estimates / community

other 2: 6000 USD 200000 USD 50000 USD

F2: Date: 4 April 2012 Zone Name of the province : Ghor

Priority response options (rank the three Zone 2 - potentially medium flood Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 1 - potentially most flood affected Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected first one) affected

food distribution 1 1 1 Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario food vouchers 2 2 seeds 7 3 3 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 10 Name of response: 16 Nb of people fodder/ animal feed Nb of people affected: 15800 Nb of people affected: 15000 9600 affected:

Emergency (short agricultural tools Timeline to respond: 2 months Timeline to respond: 4 months Timeline to respond: 4 months term) restocking of livestock How to implement: NGOs - Gov How to implement: NGOs - Gov How to implement: NGOs - Gov

IGA tool kit 14 14 Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience cash grant 2 4 4 MRRD CRS - ACF - Afghan Aid - CDC MRRD CRS - ACF - Afghan Aid - CDC MRRD CRS - ACF - Afghan Aid - CDC other 1: NFI Kit 3 5 5 other 2: Storage 8 8 Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community irrigation canals 2449000 USD 450000 USD 264500 USD agricultural land Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario reinforcement banks 6 6 construction of 4 10 10 Name of response: 2 Name of response: 13 Name of response: 15 Rehabilitation protection walls (Medium term) other 1: Protetion of Nb of people 5 11 11 Nb of people affected: 18960 Nb of people affected: 18000 12600 grazing areas affected:

other 2: Foos storage 7 7 Timeline to respond: 10 Days Timeline to respond: 5 months Timeline to respond: 4 months

other 2: CFW 6 13 13 How to implement: NGOs - Gov How to implement: NGOs - Gov How to implement: NGOs - Gov

early warning systems 12 12 Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience (what?) Mitigation Construct river bed 16 MRRD CRS - ACF - Afghan Aid - CDC MRRD CRS - ACF - Afghan Aid - CDC MRRD CRS - ACF - Afghan Aid - CDC measures for future other 1: Road (Long term) 7 15 15 Budget estimates / community Budget estimates /community Budget estimates / community Construction other 2: Shelter 9 9 632000 USD 420000 USD 220000 USD

6.1. Northern Region

North Region-

Flood prone areas

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Priority response options (rank the Gurziwan, Khani Zone 1 - potentially most flood affected Zone 2 - potentially medium flood affected Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected three first one) Belcheragh, Kohistan Chahar Khwaja Sabz , Qaysar, Bagh, Posh, Shirin Almar & Qurghan, Tagab and Maiman Qaramqol, Pashtun a city. Andkhoy Kot. food x x Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario

food vouchers Name: Seed distribution

seeds x Name: Food Name: Food Nb of people affected: 5000

fodder/ animal feed Nb of people affected: 30,000 Nb of people affected: 2000 Timeline to respond: 15 days after flood How to respond: Through partners of FSAC and agricultural tools Timeline to respond: 15 days Timeline to respond: 2 weeks after flood ANDMA. How to respond: free distribution: The project Distribution restocking of How to respond: The project should be implemented should be implemented with close coordination with Agencies with experience: livestock with close coordination of NGOs, Gov, CDCs. Gov, CDC and NGOs,

Agencies with experience: ANDMA, WFP, UNHCR, Save Agencies with experience: DAIL, Public work, Red IGA tool kit the children, SWHNO Cross society and NGOs.

cash grant x other 1: Shelter x other 2: Budget estimates / community: Budget estimates / community: Budget estimates / community:

irrigation canals x

agricultural land x Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario

reinforcement banks Name: Shelter distribution Name: Agriculture tools distribution Name: Canal rehabilitation ( 25 Km) Rehabilitation construction of x Nb of people affected: 5000 shelter Nb of people affected: 5000 Nb of people affected: protection walls other 1: Timeline to respond: 6 months after flood Timeline to respond: 2 weeks Timeline to respond: 3 months How to respond: Through agriculture NGOs, CDC ( How to respond: with close coordination with based How to respond: Through RRD, water management other 2: provincial level and district level) and water NGOs,Gov department. department, based NGOs, FSAC partners. management department. early warning Agencies with experience: UNHCR, ANDMA, OCHA and x Agencies with experience: Agencies with experience: systems (what?) based NGOs. planting trees x other 1: Construction of Mitigation x Budget estimates / community: Budget estimates /community: measures for protection walls future along the river other 2: PARR and x x Budget estimates / community: PRR training Other 3: Construction of x water bank

North Region Jawzjan Province

Flood prone areas

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Shibirghan, Priority response options (rank the Darzab, Zone 1 - potentially most flood affected Zone 2 - potentially medium flood affected Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected three first one) Qush Tepa, Faizabad, Khwaja Aqcha, Khaniqa Du Koh Mardyan, Kham Ab, Qarqin, Khamyab food x x Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario

food vouchers x

seeds x Name: Food Name: Food Name: Food voucher fodder/ animal Nb of people affected: 18000 Nb of people affected: 8000 Nb of people affected: 4800 feed agricultural tools Timeline to respond: 15 days Timeline to respond: 10 days Timeline to respond: 8 months Distribution restocking of Through voucher How to respond: Free distribution How to respond: free distribution How to respond: livestock and ration card IGA tool kit x x Agencies with experience: PDMC Agencies with experience: PDMC Agencies with experience: PMDC cash grant other 1: Shelter x s other 2: Budget estimates / community: 15,000,000 Afs Budget estimates/community: 6,000,000 Afs Budget estimates/Community: 6400,000 Afs irrigation canals x x agricultural land Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario reinforcement x Name: Irrigation canal Name: Construction of protection wall (1000 cu.m) Name: I.G.A banks Rehabilitation construction of x Nb of people affected: 6000 Nb of people affected: 14,880 Nb of people affected: 4800 protection walls other 1: Cash for x Timeline to respond: 28 days Timeline to respond: 3 months Timeline to respond: 6 months work other 2: How to respond: Cash for work How to respond: Cash for work How to respond: Through training early warning x x x Agencies with experience: PDMC Agencies with experience: Experienced INGOs Agencies with experience: A lot of NGOs systems (what?) Mitigation planting trees measures for Budget estimates / community: 14,000,000 future other 1: Budget estimates / community: 4334400 Afs Budget estimates /community: 6,000,000 Afs Afs other 2:

North Region

Flood prone areas

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Priority response options (rank the three first one) Zone 1 - potentially most flood affected Zone 2 - potentially medium flood affected Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected Chimtal, Shortepa Nahri Kishindih, and Shahi, Sholgara, Kaldar Khulm Zari

food 1 1 1 Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario

food vouchers Name of districts: Shortepa & Kaldar Districts: Chimtal, Keshendi, Zari and Charbolak

seeds 2 2 Name: Food for work (FFW) Name: Food distribution Name:

fodder/ animal feed Nb of people affected: 500 Nb of people affected: 28,000 Nb of people affected:

agricultural tools Timeline to respond: 72 hours Timeline to respond: 10 days Timeline to respond:

restocking of livestock How to respond: In initial step direct How to respond: Direct food distribution How to respond: Distribution

Agencies with experience: Action Aid, WFP, ARCS, Agencies with experience: PIN, ARCS, ACTED, SVC, ICRC, WFP, IGA tool kit 2 Agencies with experience: Johanniter and Save the Children, IOM, NRC AREA, Johanniter

cash grant

other 1: potable water 1 1

other 2: Livestock 3 Budget estimates / community: 116,600 $ Budget estimates / community: 1,515,000 $ Budget estimates / community:

irrigation canals 3 3 4

agricultural land Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario

reinforcement banks Name of districts: Shortepa & Kaldar Districts: Chimtal, Keshendi, Zari and Charbolak Name: Rehabilitation construction of 4 Name: Food for work (FFW) Name: Cash for work Nb of people affected: protection walls other 1: Nursery 4 Nb of people affected: 7000 Nb of people affected: 10,000 Timeline to respond:

other 2: Timeline to respond: 2 months Timeline to respond: 1 month How to respond:

How to respond: Through CDC, community elders and How to respond: Through CDC, community elders and early warning systems 5 5 Agencies with experience: other stakeholders stakeholders

Agencies with experience: Action Aid, WFP, ARCS, Mitigation measures for planting trees 5 Agencies with experience: PIN, ARCS, ACTED, SVC Johanniter and Save the Children future other 1: Budget estimates / community:

other 2: Budget estimates / community: 213,200 $ Budget estimates / community: 1,515,000 $

Types of Activities: canal cleaning, sub canal digging.

North Region- Saripul Province Flood prone areas Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3

Sayyad & Priority response options (rank the three Kohistan Sozma districts Zone 1 - potentially most flood affected Zone 2 - potentially medium flood affected Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected first one) Balkhab Qala and half district district part of province center

food 1 1 Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario food vouchers Name: Construction of storage seeds Name: Food distribution Name: Food for Work (FFW) Nb of people affected: 87000 fodder/ animal feed Nb of people affected: 16,750 Nb of people affected: 15,950 Timeline to respond: 6 months

agricultural tools 5 Timeline to respond: one week Timeline to respond: 6 months How to respond: Through experienced NGOs

How to respond: free distribution: Through CDC and Distribution restocking of livestock How to respond: Provincial response team Agencies with experience: experienced NGOs, IGA tool kit Agencies with experience: Agencies with experience: cash grant Budget estimates /community: other 1: Cash 1 distribution other 2: Construction storage for agri 2 Budget estimates / community: Budget estimates / community: products irrigation canals 2 3 agricultural land Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario reinforcement banks Name: Construction of protection wall Name: Protection wall construction Name: Cash distribution construction of Rehabilitation 3 2 4 Nb of people affected: 16,750 Nb of people affected: 15,950 Nb of people affected: 87000 protection walls other 1: FFW 4 Timeline to respond: 6 months Timeline to respond: 6 months Timeline to respond: 6 months

other 2: IGA Training 5 How to respond: Through experienced NGOs How to respond: Through experienced NGOs How to respond: Through experienced NGOs

early warning systems 4 3 5 Agencies with experience: Agencies with experience: Agencies with experience: (what?) Mitigation planting trees Budget estimates / community: measures for other 1: Budget estimates /community: Budget estimates /community: future other 2: Other 3: North Region-

Flood prone areas

Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Priority response options (rank the Zone 1 - potentially most flood affected Zone 2 - potentially medium flood affected Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected three first one) Khuram Royi Du Dara-i-Suf Wa Ab Sarbagh

food 1 1 1 Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario food vouchers Name: Food distribution seeds 3 2 2 Name: Food distribution Name: Food distribution Nb of people affected: 12,000 Nb of people affected: 15,000 ( 60% to 70% of fodder/ animal feed 2 3 Nb of people affected: 12000 Timeline to respond: 1 week total population) How to respond: Through PDMC, DDMC and agricultural tools Timeline to respond: one week Timeline to respond: 1 week partners ( AAD, GTZ, MAIL, DAIL, WFP How to respond: Through district disaster How to respond: free distribution: Through comittee or provincial committee. Pre-position Agencies with experience: AAD, ARCS, BRAC, Distribution restocking of livestock PDMC, DDMC and through partners ACF, GTZ, the food stock the food in Royi in IOM, FAO, WFP and MAIL Helvatas, Afghanaid, ARCS, IOM WFP. advance Agencies with experience: Soliarities Agencies with experience: ACF, WFP, Helvatas, IGA tool kit international, Helvetas, ARCS, District ANDMA, District ANDMA, DAIL. UNOPS, IOM and WFP. Budget estimates /community: $ 30,000 for cash grant Budget estimates / community: $ 37,500 Budget estimates / community: $ 30,000 12000 beneficiries for transportation other 1: Cash 3 distribution other 2: irrigation canals 4 agricultural land Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario reinforcement banks Name: fodder Name: Seed distribution Name: Seed distribution construction of 4 4 5 Nb of animal affected: 10,000 Nb of families affected: 800 Nb of people affected: 3000 Rehabilitation protection walls other 1: Natural 5 5 Timeline to respond: 2 weeks Timeline to respond: 1 or 2 months Timeline to respond: 1 month resource management

How to respond: Through PDMC and DDMC, How to respond: PDMC, DDMC, and partners ( How to respond: Through PDMC, DDMC and other 2: through partners, DAIL, AAD, FAO, Helvitas ACF, Helvitas, GTZ) partners ( AAD, FAO early warning systems Agencies with experience: DAIl, AAD, FAO, Agencies with experience: DAIL, FAO, Helvitas, 6 6 6 Agencies with experience: AAD, DAIL, FAO (what?) Helvitas GTZ Budget estimates / community: $ 200,000 for planting trees 10000 bags concentrate ( $ 30,000 required for Mitigation transportation and distribution) measures for Budget estimates /community: $ 25,000 required Budget estimates /community: $ 10,000 future other 1: for procurement and $ 5000 required for needed for procurement of seed and its transportation. transportation other 2: Other 3:

6.1. Eastern Region

Date: 9 May F2: Zone Name of the province : Nuristan 2012

Priority response options (rank the three Zone Zone 2 - potentially medium flood Zone 1 Zone 3 Zone 1 - potentially most flood affected Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected first one) 2 affected

Food Distribution 1 3 3 Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario NFI kit 2 4 4 Shelter 3 5 5 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1 Nb of people Cash Transfer 4 6 6 Nb of people affected: 24500 Nb of people affected: 25000 25000 affected: Potable water Timeline to respond: 72 Hours Timeline to respond: 2 Months Timeline to respond: 2 Months Emergency (short NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov, NGOs, INGOs, UN, NGOs, INGOs, UN, term) Doctors mobile team How to implement: How to implement: How to implement: CDC Gov, CDC Gov, CDC Rescue committee Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Fodder/Animal feed ARCS ANDMA - MRRD - NGOs ARCS ANDMA - MRRD - NGOs NGOs - FAO - DAIL other 1: other 2: Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community Seeds distribution 5 7 1 100000 USD 50000 USD 100000 USD CFW 6 1 7 Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario FFW 7 8 8 Livestock 8 9 9 Name of response: 2 Name of response: 2 Name of response: 2 Rehabilitation Nb of people Forestry Rehabiliation 9 10 Nb of people affected: 24500 Nb of people affected: 28000 25000 (Medium term) affected: Tree planation 14 15 Timeline to respond: 72 Hours Timeline to respond: 2 Years Timeline to respond: 6 Months

NGOs, INGOs, UN, NGOs, INGOs, UN, NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gardening 15 2 How to implement: How to implement: How to implement: Gov, CDC Gov, CDC Gov, CDC

early warning systems 10 11 10 Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience (what?) Mitigation ANDMA - MRRD - NGOs - DAIL Food Storage building 11 12 11 ARCS ANDMA - MRRD - NGOs ARCS MRRD - NGOs - MoPW measures for - IFHOPE future (Long term) Protection Wall 12 13 12 Budget estimates / community Budget estimates /community Budget estimates / community Roads construction 13 14 2 600000 USD 80000 USD 200000 USD

F2: Date: 9 May 2012 Zone Name of the province : Kunar

Priority response options (rank the three Zone Zone 2 - potentially medium flood Zone 1 Zone 3 Zone 1 - potentially most flood affected Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected first one) 2 affected

Food distribution 2 3 3 Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Shelter 3 2 4 NFI kit 11 4 5 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1 Potable water 16 5 Nb of people affected: 3729 Nb of people affected: 5000 Nb of people affected: 6500 Doctors mobile team 5 6 Timeline to respond: 24 Hours Timeline to respond: 2 Months Timeline to respond: 3 Months NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov, NGOs, INGOs, UN, NGOs, INGOs, UN, Emergency (short Rescue committee 1 7 How to implement: How to implement: How to implement: term) CDC Gov, CDC Gov, CDC Fodder/Animal feed 9 Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience ARCS - MRRD - Cash transfer 6 MoPW ARCS - MRRD - ANDMA - WFP - IOM - DAIL MoPW ANDMA MRRD - MoPW - Municipality ANDMA - WFP Forestry Rehabilitation 2 other 1: Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community Seeds distribution 7 8 6 100000 USD 65000 USD 50000 USD

CFW 8 12 7 Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario

FFW 12 11 8 Cash grant 13 10 9 Name of response: 2 Name of response: 2 Name of response: 2 Rehabilitation (Medium term) Nb of people Fertilizer 14 9 10 3729 Nb of people affected: 3729 Nb of people affected: 7000 affected: Business 10 Timeline to respond: 72 Hours Timeline to respond: 3 Months Timeline to respond: One Year

NGOs, INGOs, UN, NGOs, INGOs, UN, Opening of closed roads 1 How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov, CDC How to implement: How to implement: Gov, CDC Gov, CDC early warning systems 18 15 12 Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience (what?) ARCS - MRRD - ANDMA - WFP - Mitigation measures Food Storage building 4 14 CDCs ARCS - MRRD - ANDMA - DRR - DAIL ANDMA MRRD - MoPW - Municipality for future (Long IOM - DAIL term) Check dams 17 16 11 Budget estimates / community Budget estimates /community Budget estimates / community

Protection Wall 15 13 1 55000 USD 372900 USD 110000 USD

F2: Date: 9 May 2012 Zone Name of the province : Laghman

Priority response options (rank the Zone Zone Zone Zone 1 - potentially most flood affected Zone 2 - potentially medium flood affected Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected three first one) 1 2 3 Food distribution 2 1 1 Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Rescue committee 1 10 Cash transfer 15 11 3 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1 NFI kit 16 12 Nb of people affected: 45580 Nb of people affected: 12460 Nb of people affected: 4340 Shelter 3 4 2 Timeline to respond: 42 - 72 hours Timeline to respond: 42 - 72 hours Timeline to respond: 42 - 72 hours Emergency NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov, Medical Kit 4 2 How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov, CDC How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov, CDC How to implement: (short term) CDC Fodder/Animal feed 9 Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience ARCS - ADNMA - DAIL - RRD - WFP - Potable water 17 PDMC ARCS - ADNMA - DAIL - RRD PDMC PDMC ARCS - ADNMA - DAIL - RRD - WFP - FAO FAO other 1: other 2: Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community Seeds distribution 7 5 6 150000 USD 190000 USD 310000 USD CFW 11 13 10 Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario FFW 12 14 11 Rehabilitation Cash grant 13 15 8 Name of response: 2 Name of response: 5 Name of response: 2 (Medium term) Infrastructure 8 6 4 Nb of people affected: 45580 Nb of people affected: 12460 Nb of people affected: 4340 other 2: Timeline to respond: 42 - 72 hours Timeline to respond: 42 - 72 hours Timeline to respond: 42 - 72 hours NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov, other 2: How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov, CDC How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov, CDC How to implement: CDC early warning 5 7 7 Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience systems (what?) Mitigation ARCS - ADNMA - DAIL - RRD - WFP - measures for Food Storage building 14 8 12 PDMC ARCS - ADNMA - DAIL - RRD - WFP - FAO PDMC PDMC ARCS - ADNMA - DAIL - RRD - WFP - FAO future (Long FAO term) Check dams 6 3 5 Budget estimates / community Budget estimates /community Budget estimates / community Protection Wall 10 9 9 120000 USD 250000 USD 124000 USD

F2: Date: 9 May 2012 Zone Name of the province : Nangarhar

Priority response options (rank the Zone Zone Zone Zone 1 - potentially most flood affected Zone 2 - potentially medium flood affected Zone 3 - potentially less flood affected three first one) 1 2 3 Food distribution 1 3 10 Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario Response 1 - worst case scenario First Medical kit 7 4 Potable water 2 14 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1 Name of response: 1 Nb of people Nb of people fodder/ animal feed 6 66000 Nb of people affected: 5000 400000 affected: affected: Emergency Timeline to NFI Kit 5 5 8 Timeline to respond: one week Timeline to respond: 3 Days 3 Months (short term) respond: NGOs, INGOs, UN, NGOs, INGOs, UN, Rescue Committee 3 1 11 How to implement: How to implement: How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov Gov Gov Agencies with Agencies with Agencies with cast transfer 4 6 7 experience experience experience other 2: WFP - FAO - Gov WFP - FAO - Gov NGOs - INGOs - Gov IGA tool kit 13 16 Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community Budget estimates / community Seeds distribution 9 7 113000 USD 500000 USD 18000 Irrigation system 11 15 Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario Response 2 - worst case scenario CFW 10 8 4 Rehabilitation FFW 8 9 5 Name of response: 8 Name of response: 2 Name of response: 2 (Medium Nb of people Nb of people Cash grant 14 11000 Nb of people affected: 8333 66000 term) affected: affected: Timeline to Shelter 12 2 9 Timeline to respond: 3 Months Timeline to respond: 1 Week 3 Months respond: NGOs, INGOs, UN, NGOs, INGOs, UN, other 2: How to implement: How to implement: How to implement: NGOs, INGOs, UN, Gov Gov Gov early warning systems 15 11 1 Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Agencies with experience Mitigation (what?) measures for Forestry 16 10 3 WFP - Gov - IOM - IRC NRC - IOM - UNCHR - CHF NGOs - INGOs - Gov - UN future (Long Rehabilitation term) Check dams 17 13 2 Budget estimates / community Budget estimates /community Budget estimates / community Protection Wall 18 11 6 7200000 USD 1000000 USD 4000000 USD