DOCSLIB.ORG

D3.4 Consequences of Extreme Weather

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
D3.4 Consequences of Extreme Weather Extreme weather impacts on European networks of transport Grant Nr 233919 Co-funded by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme, Transport, Horizontal activities D3.4 Consequences of extreme weather Project: EWENT Document Number and Title: D3.4 Consequences of extreme weather Work-Package: WP3 Deliverable Type: Report Contractual Date of Delivery: M11 (November 2010) Actual Date of Delivery: Author/Responsible(s): DLR Contributors: DLR: Jens Bläsche, Michael Kreuz, Thorsten Mühlhausen via donau: Juha Schweighofer VTT: Pekka Leviäkangas, Riitta Molarius, Mar- ko Nokkala Cymet: Spyros Athanasatos, Silas Michaelides, Mathaios Papadakis TOI: Johanna Ludvigsen Approval of this report: by the EC Summary of this report: Keyword List: WP3, D3, EWENT, extreme weather, transport system, consequences Dissemination level: Public (PU) 1/136 Version history Version Date Status Author (Partner) Description 0.1 17.06.2011 1st draft Thorsten Mühlhausen, Mi- outline chael Kreuz, Jens Bläsche (all DLR) 0.15 08.07.2011 Draft Thorsten Mühlhausen, Mi- Included all available chael Kreuz (all DLR) information from D3.1 to D3.3 0.16 28.07.2011 Juha Schweighofer (via do- Inclusion of inland nau) waterway infrastruc- ture and Annex relat- ed to IWT 0.2 07.10.2011 Thorsten Mühlhausen, Mi- Editiorial work chael Kreuz (all DLR), Pekka + Leviäkangas, Riitta Molarius Weather related road (all VTT) accident rates in Fin- land + Incorporation of a weather vs. conse- quence overview table 0.21 13.10.2011 Juha Schweighofer (via do- Editorial work nau) 0.22 14.10.2011 Spyros Athanasatos (cymet), Chapter 3.4.3 added Thorsten Mühlhausen, Mi- + editorial changes chael Kreuz (all DLR) 0.3 20.10.2011 Spyros Athanasatos (cymet), References added, Thorsten Mühlhausen, Mi- tables harmonized, chael Kreuz (all DLR) editiorial changes 0.31 03.11.2011 Juha Schweighofer (via do- Editorial changes nau) 0.32 07.11.2011 Thorsten Mühlhausen, Mi- Editorial work chael Kreuz (all DLR), Askola Hanna, Marko Nokka- la, Pekka Leviäkangas (VTT), Juha Schweighofer (via do- nau), Johanna Ludvigsen (TOI) 0.9 18.11.2011 Final draft Thorsten Mühlhausen, Mi- Incorportation of final chael Kreuz (all DLR), comments Askola Hanna, Marko Nokka- la, Pekka Leviäkangas (VTT), 2/136 Juha Schweighofer (via do- nau), Johanna Ludvigsen (TOI) 1.0 01.12.2011 Final Thorsten Mühlhausen, Mi- version chael Kreuz (all DLR), Pekka Leviäkangas (VTT), Juha Schweighofer, Nina Siedl, Tabea Reicher (all via donau) 1.01 18.01.2012 Extended Thorsten Mühlhausen, Mi- Addition of aviation final chael Kreuz (all DLR) outlook version 1.1 02.02.2012 Extended Thorsten Mühlhausen, Mi- Outlook for all traffic final chael Kreuz, Juha means added version Schweighofer (via donau), Pekka Leviäkangas, Marko Nokkala (VTT), Spyros Atha- nasatos (cymet) 1.2 09.02.2012 Final edito- Thorsten Mühlhausen, Mi- rial com- chael Kreuz, Juha ments in- Schweighofer (via donau), corporated Pekka Leviäkangas (VTT) (If dissemination of the Deliverable is restricted, add Distribution list) Distribution list European Commission Iona-Olga Adamescu EWENT partners E-mail list EWENT Steering Committee E-mail list Website http://ewent.vtt.fi 3/136 This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of EWENT Consortium and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. 4/136 Executive summary This document is the third step in the EWENT approach to analyse and mitigate the influence of extreme weather on the European transport network. The two previous documents deal with the weather phenomena, which have influence on the different traffic modes (road, rail, aviation, in- land waterways and maritime shipping), and with future weather scenarios, which impact these phenomena. In this document a quantitative approach to analyse the different traffic means is developed, which is used in the subsequent work packages to carry out cost analysis and develop risk mitigation strategies. The approach is two-stepped. First the impact of extreme weather phenomena on the abovemen- tioned modes of transport is analysed. Example corridors or hot spots are identified for each traffic mean in each of the five identified climate areas (Nordic, Temperate, Alpine, Mediterranean and Maritime) and quantitatively assessed. Then following, the cost inducing effects of the weather phenomena are discussed. Both steps are evaluated separately for each transport mode because their sensitivity and resili- ence differ significantly from each other. Finally, the expected impact changes are shown in a comprehensive summary table. The analysis shows that especially road traffic with its two traffic patterns, freight transport be- tween major knots on corridors and passenger flows in large cities that are affected by delay. Also aviation that has high weather dependence already today, will suffer from extreme weather events in the future. The reason for this is two-folded. On one hand, wind gusts will increase, especially in the southern part of Europe and on the other hand, free capacity, which is currently used to buffer weather events, will be occupied by additional flights. Hence the impact of weather will be even higher than today. For the other traffic modes no significant change in delay behavior due to ex- treme weather is expected in the long-term future, but already at present the delays do exist to the extent that requires attention. For all transport modes the accident rates should have a declining trend or stay on a low level in the future as it is expected that better technique and higher safety standards, which today are best adopted in aviation, will influence the accident rate more than the expected weather changes. 5/136 Table of contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 8 2. Methodical approach ................................................................................................ 10 3. Impact of extreme weather phenomena .................................................................. 12 3.1. Road ................................................................................................................................ 12 3.1.1. Infrastructure ..................................................................................................... 12 3.1.2. Safety ................................................................................................................. 17 3.1.3. Operators ........................................................................................................... 21 3.2. Rail .................................................................................................................................. 22 3.2.1. Infrastructure ..................................................................................................... 22 3.2.2. Safety ................................................................................................................. 25 3.2.3. Operators ........................................................................................................... 28 3.3. Aviation ........................................................................................................................... 28 3.3.1. Infrastructure ..................................................................................................... 28 3.3.2. Safety ................................................................................................................. 34 3.3.3. Operators ........................................................................................................... 36 3.4. Marine / short sea ........................................................................................................... 37 3.4.1. Infrastructure ..................................................................................................... 37 3.4.2. Safety ................................................................................................................. 40 3.4.3. Operators ........................................................................................................... 43 3.5. Inland Waterways ........................................................................................................... 46 3.5.1. Infrastructure ..................................................................................................... 46 3.5.2. Safety ................................................................................................................. 54 4. Cost inducing effects of extreme weather phenomena ............................................. 61 4.1. Road ................................................................................................................................ 61 4.1.1. Delays in road transport .................................................................................... 61 4.1.2. Accidents in road transport................................................................................ 62 4.1.3. Consequences from infrastructure point of view ............................................... 69 4.2. Rail .................................................................................................................................. 70 4.2.1. Overview of impacts and consequences by weather phenomena ..................... 72 4.3. Aviation ..........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Espoon Kaupunkiradan Liikennöintiselvitys
    12 2013 Espoon kaupunkiradan liikennöintiselvitys Espoon kaupunkiradan liikennöintiselvitys HSL Helsingin seudun liikenne HSL Helsingin seudun liikenne Opastinsilta 6 A PL 100, 00077 HSL puhelin (09) 4766 4444 www.hsl.fi Lisätietoja: Tero Anttila [email protected] Copyright: Kartat, graafit, ja muut kuvat Hsl / 2013 Kansikuva: HSL / Rauni Kaunisto Painopaikka Helsinki 2013 Esipuhe Rantaradalle on laadittu yleissuunnitelmat kaupunkiraiteiden jatkamista Espoon Leppävaarasta Espoon keskukseen sekä Espoon keskuksesta Kauklahteen. Liikennevirasto on käynnistänyt rata- suunnittelutyön koskien kaupunkirataa välillä Leppävaara–Kauklahti. Käynnistynyt ratasuunnitelma ei sisällä liikennetarkasteluita, joita tarvitaan hankkeesta tehtävässä hankearvioinnissa. Espoon kaupunkiradan liikennöintiselvitys -työn tarkoituksena on tuottaa ratasuunnitelmaa varten tiedot lähi- ja taajamajunien liikennöinnistä, bussien liityntäliikenteestä sekä hankearvioinnin edel- lyttämistä liikenteellisistä tarkasteluista. Toteutuessaan kaupunkiraiteet parantavat Espoon ja Kirkkonummen suunnan joukkoliikenteen tarjontaa ja liikenteen luotettavuutta sekä luovat mahdollisuuden kehittää sekä bussien että henki- löautojen ja polkupyörien liityntäliikennettä. Helsingin seudun liikennejärjestelmäsuunnitelma HLJ 2011:ssa infrastruktuurin kehittämishankkeiden kiireellisyysjärjestyksessä seitsemäntenä mainitaan Kaupunkirata Leppävaara–Espoo, joka tulisi aloittaa vuoteen 2020 mennessä. Valtioneuvoston liikennepoliittisessa selonteossa eduskunnalle 2012 Espoon kaupunkirata on
    [Show full text]
  • Helsinki–Turku-Käytävän Henkilöliikenteen Kehitysnäkymät Toteutuspolut Yhteysvälin Kehittämiseksi
    Liikenneviraston tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä 4/2016 Hanna Kalenoja Samuli Alppi Markus Helelä Elina Väistö Helsinki–Turku-käytävän henkilöliikenteen kehitysnäkymät Toteutuspolut yhteysvälin kehittämiseksi Hyvinkää Paimio Piikkiö Salo Hyvinkää Hyvinkää Paimio Piikkiö Paimio Salo Piikkiö Salo Lohja Lohja Lohja Hista Espoo Hista Espoo Hista Siuntio Espoo Karjaa Masala Karjaa Siuntio Masala Karjaa Siuntio Inkoo Inkoo Masala Kirkkonummi Kirkkonummi Inkoo KirkkonummiTammisaari Tammisaari Tammisaari Hanko Hanko Hanko Helsinki-Turku- moottoritie Helsinki-Turku- uusi ratayhteys moottoritie Helsinki-Turku- uusi ratayhteys moottoritie uusi ratayhteys Hanna Kalenoja, Samuli Alppi, Markus Helelä, Elina Väistö Helsinki–Turku-käytävän henkilöliikenteen kehitysnäkymät Toteutuspolut yhteysvälin kehittämiseksi Liikenneviraston tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä 4/2016 Liikennevirasto Helsinki 2016 Kannen kuva: Sito Oy Verkkojulkaisu pdf (www.liikennevirasto.fi) ISSN-L 1798-6656 ISSN 1798-6664 ISBN 978-952-317-211-1 Liikennevirasto PL 33 00521 HELSINKI Puhelin 0295 34 3000 3 Hanna Kalenoja, Samuli Alppi, Markus Helelä ja Elina Väistö: Helsinki–Turku-käytävän hen- kilöliikenteen kehitysnäkymät. Liikennevirasto, liikenne ja maankäyttö -osasto. Helsinki 2016. Liikenneviraston tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä 4/2016. 80 sivua. ISSN-L 1798-6656, ISSN 1798- 6664, ISBN 978-952-317-211-1. Avainsanat: nopea junayhteys, kehityskäytävä, kaukojunaliikenne, aluerakenne, työssäkäynti- alue Tiivistelmä Työn tavoitteena on ollut kuvata Helsinki–Turku-yhteysvälin henkilöliikenteen nykyti-
    [Show full text]
  • Transport System Planning in the Helsinki Region Helsinki Regional Transport Authority
    Transport system planning in the Helsinki region Helsinki Regional Transport Authority Tuire Valkonen, transport planner Contents 1. Helsinki Regional Transport Authority HRT in general 2. Helsinki Region Transport System Plan (HLJ) • The role of the plan • Background • Preparation process • HLJ 2015 policies • Examples of measures • How we cummunicate with citizens? What does HRT do? • Is responsible for the preparation of the Helsinki Region Transport System Plan (HLJ). • Plans and organizes public transport in the region and works to improve its operating conditions. • Procures bus, tram, Metro, ferry and commuter train services. • Approves the public transport fare and ticketing system as well as public transport fares. • Is responsible for public transport marketing and passenger information. • Organizes ticket sales and is responsible for ticket inspection. HRT’s basic structure (c. 360 persons) The location of the Helsinki Region in Europe HRT area and HLJ planning area Municipalities of the Keski-Uusimaa Region (KUUMA) • Land area approximately 3700 km2 • Population 1.38 million According to its charter, HRT may expand to cover all 14 municipalities in the Helsinki region. HRT Region 1.1.2012 Cities of the Helsinki 6 Metropolitan Area The main networks and terminals Nationally significant public transport terminal International airport Harbor Railway Raiway for freight traffic Metroline High way Main road Regional way In process… Ring Rail Line The west metro Helsinki Region Transport System Planning The role of the Helsinki Region Transport System Plan (HLJ) • A long-term strategic plan that considers the transport system as a whole. • Aligns regional transport policy and guidelines primary measures for the development of the transport system.
    [Show full text]
  • Ojanko Bus Contract Tendering
    Helsinki Region Transport Helsinki Region Commuter Trains Tendering Project Kimmo Sinisalo Kimmo Sinisalo 4.10.2017 Presentation agenda Commuter train services • Current contract and operating situation • Past performance statistics Proposed tendering plan Market dialogue • Whole presentation will be published on the HSL website after the event • No questions please until the end of each section Kimmo Sinisalo 4.10.2017 Helsinki region commuter trains: Background to the current interim contract Kimmo Sinisalo 4.10.2017 Institutional setting for Finland 2017 (changes in the near future) Authority Prime Minister’s Office, Ministry of Transport Regulatory Issues State ownership Office MetropolitanMetropolitan MunicipalitiesMetropolitan (7) Finnish Transport MunicipalitiesMunicipalities (7) (7) Safety Agency Trafi ”Strategy of the owner” Rail regulatory Payment Owner Dividend Body Payment Finnish Competition HSL Helsinki Region Authority Payment Transport Authority Infrastructure Transport Payment Rent Money VR Group Ltd. Steering VR Track (maintenance VR (passenger) Payment Finnish and construction) Contract Transport Rolling Stock Agency LiVi Finrail oy Depot Stations VR Transpoint Company (Infrastructure (Traffic (freight) JKOY Manager) control) Comments: Access • VR Commuter operations is now a separate charges Private Rent Private business unit under VR Passenger division Freight Freight Operators Stations Operators StationsStations (Municipalities) Kimmo Sinisalo 4.10.2017 Background: contractual arrangements HSL negotiated direct
    [Show full text]
  • D 3.3 Scenario's and Case Studies
    RAIN – Risk Analysis of Infrastructure Networks in Response to Extreme Weather Project Reference: 608166 FP7-SEC-2013-1 Impact of extreme weather on critical infrastructure Project Duration: 1 May 2014 – 30 April 2017 Security Sensitivity Committee Deliverable Evaluation Deliverable Reference D 3.3 Deliverable Name Scenario’s anD case stuDies Contributing Partners UNIZA Date of Submission 07-08-2015 The evaluation is: • The content is not related to general project management • The content is not related to general outcomes as dissemination and communication • The content is related to critical infrastructure vulnerability or sensitivity • The content is publicly available or commonly known* • The content does not add new information that might be misused by possible criminal offenders • The content will not harm essential interests of the EU or MS • The content will not cause societal anxiety or social unrest • There is no need to contact the National Security Authority Diagram path 1-2-3-4-6-7-8-9. Therefor the evaluation is Public. * Although the content used is publicly available the added value of this D3.3. is the condensed information within one document, the information publisheD as such gives no neeD for a evaluation to confidential or restricted. Decision of Evaluation Public ConfiDential RestricteD Evaluator Name P.L. Prak, MSSM Evaluator Signature Was signeD 2015-10-19 Date of Evaluation 2015-10-12 This project has receiveD funDing from the European Union’s Seventh FrameworK Programme for research, technological Development
    [Show full text]
  • RAILWAY NETWORK STATEMENT 2021 Updated 18 June 2021
    Updated 18 June 2021 Publications of the FTIA 46eng/2019 RAILWAY NETWORK STATEMENT 2021 Updated 18 June 2021 Updated 18 June 2021 Railway Network Statement 2021 FTIA's publications 46eng/2019 Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency Helsinki 2019 Updated 18 June 2021 Photo on the cover: FTIA's photo archive Online publication pdf (www.vayla.fi) ISSN 2490-0745 ISBN 978-952-317-744-4 Väylävirasto PL 33 00521 HELSINKI Puhelin 0295 34 3000 Updated 18 June 2021 FTIA’s publications 46/2019 3 Railway Network Statement 2021 Foreword In compliance with the Rail Transport Act (1302/2018 (in Finnish)) and in its capacity as the manager of the state-owned railway network, the Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency is publishing the Network Statement of Finland’s state-owned railway network (hereafter the ‘Network Statement’) for the timetable period 2021. The Network Statement describes the state-owned railway network, access conditions, the infrastructure capacity allocation process, the services supplied to railway undertakings and their pricing as well as the principles for determining the infrastructure charge. The Network Statement is published for each timetable period for applicants requesting infrastructure capacity. This Network Statement covers the timetable period 13 December 2020 – 11 December 2021. The Network Statement 2021 has been prepared on the basis of the previous Network Statement taking into account the feedback received from users and the Network Statements of other European Infrastructure Managers. The Network Statement 2021 is published as a PDF publication. The Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency updates the Network Statement as necessary and keeps capacity managers and known applicants for infrastructure capacity in the Finnish railway network up to date on the document.
    [Show full text]
  • JKOY Class Sm5
    JKOY Class Sm5 English: JKOY Class Sm5 is an electric multiple unit operated on the Helsinki commuter rail system. Suomi: Sm5-lähijuna on Helsingin lähiliikenteessä käytetty sähkökäyttöinen matalalattiainen lähijuna. JKOY Class Sm5. electric multiple unit train. Wikipedia. Media in category "JKOY Class Sm5". The following 56 files are in this category, out of 56 total. The Sm5 electric multiple unit is a low-floor train used on the Helsinki commuter rail network. Unlike other train types on the network, the Sm5 units are owned by Pääkaupunkiseudun Junakalusto Oy, a subsidiary of the cities of Helsinki, Espoo, Vantaa and Kauniainen and the VR Group. For faster navigation, this Iframe is preloading the Wikiwand page for JKOY Class Sm5. Home. News. JKOY Class Sm5. Sm5 series is that of the Finnish Transport Safety Agency ( Liikenteen turvallisuusvirasto ) fixed term for a four-part series EMUs for local and regional traffic. They are the property of the company Pääkaupunkiseudun Junakalusto ( JKOY ) and are used in the Helsinki commuter train. The trains were developed by Stadler Rail and belong to Flirt family. The original order of 32 vehicles in 2011 increased by a further nine to 41 vehicles. VR Class Sm3 by fiat ferroviaria ( 2000 ) Finnish Railways Pendolino Class Sm3 7103/7603 departs Helsinki on 8 Aug 2011 by A Scotson, on Flickr VR Pendolino by ArtDvU, on Flickr Pendolino by haarajoki, on Flickr. VITORIA MAN. View Public Profile. JKOY Class Sm5 (Q911511). From Wikidata. Jump to navigation Jump to search.
    [Show full text]
  • Finnish Railway Network Statement 2020 Updated on 18 June 2020
    Updated on 18 June 2020 FTA’s Transport Infrastructure Data 3/2018 Finnish Railway Network Statement 2020 Updated on 18 June 2020 Updated on 18 June 2020 Finnish Railway Network Statement 2020 Transport Infrastructure Data of the Finnish Transport Agency 3/2018 Finnish Transport Agency Helsinki 2018 Updated on 18 June 2020 Photograph on the cover: Simo Toikkanen Online publication pdf (www.liikennevirasto.fi) ISSN-L 1798-8276 ISSN 1798-8284 ISBN 978-952-317-649-2 Finnish Transport Agency P.O. Box 33 FI-00521 Helsinki, Finland Tel. +358 (0)29 534 3000 Updated on 18 June 2020 FTA’s Transport Infrastructure Data 3/2018 3 Finnish Railway Network Statement 2020 Foreword In compliance with the Rail Transport Act (1302/2018), the Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency (FTIA), as the manager of the state-owned railway network, publishes the Finnish Railway Network Statement (hereinafter the Network Statement) for the timetable period 2020. The Network Statement describes the access conditions, the state-owned railway network, the rail capacity allocation process, the services supplied to railway undertakings and their pricing as well as the principles for determining the infrastructure charge. The Network Statement is published for applicants requesting capacity for each timetable period. This Network Statement is intended for the timetable period 15 December 2019–12 December 2020. The Network Statement 2020 has been prepared based on the previous Network Statement taking into account the feedback received from users and the Network Statements of other European Infrastructure Managers. The Network Statement 2020 is published as a PDF publication. The Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency will update the Network Statement and will provide information about it to rail capacity allocatees and the known applicants for rail capacity in the Finnish railway network.
    [Show full text]
  • Helsinki Urban Underground Spaces – New Guidelines for Visitors
    Helsinki Urban Underground Spaces New guidelines for visitors Due to the Covid-19 pandemic changes may occur. Please check the service provider´s website for the latest information. City of Helsinki Covid-19 information for visitors www.myhelsinki.f/en/coronavirus-covid-19-information-for-visitors Contents Foreword 4 Underground master planning is a signifcant part of land-use planning in Helsinki 5 Underground spaces open to the public 7 Amos Rex 9 Temppeliaukio Church 10 Musiikkitalo – the Helsinki Music Centre 11 The Olympic Stadium 12 Metro stations 13 Underground walking and shopping routes 14 Underground parking 18 Sport facilities 19 The Ring Rail Line, Airport railway station & Aviapolis 20 Itäkeskus swimming hall and emergency shelter 21 Underground spaces where authorisation is required 22 The city centre service tunnel 23 The Viikinmäki wastewater treatment plant 25 Hartwall Arena training hall and restaurant 26 Development of the urban structure and constructions for public transport 27 Underground spaces not open for visits 28 Technical tunnels 29 Suomenlinna island emergency and service tunnel 29 Esplanadi artifcial lake and Mustikkamaa heat caverns 30 The future 31 Garden Helsinki 32 The FinEst Railway tunnel 33 Länsimetro, West Metro extension, phase 2 34 The New National 35 The Kaisa Tunnel 36 Underground Helsinki is based on coordination 37 Application to visit underground spaces in Helsinki 38 Cover photo: Amos Rex Art Museum (Tuomas Uusheimo) Layout: Valve Branding Oy Foreword Helsinki’s underground spaces have been of increasing international interest. Requests for visits come almost daily to the author of this brochure alone. At the same time, safety regulations for underground facilities – especially for technical tunnels – have tightened considerably from previous years.
    [Show full text]
  • Climatology and Scenarios up to the 2050S
    Extreme weather impacts on European networks of transport Grant Nr 233919 Co-funded by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme, Transport, Horizontal activities D2.1 Probabilities of adverse weather affecting transport in Europe: climatology and scenarios up to the 2050s Project: EWENT Document Number and Title: D2.1 (In DoW: Geographical mapping and final report the probabilities of weather extremes and harmful events and scenarios in Europe) Work-Package: WP2 Deliverable Type: Report Contractual Date of Delivery: 31.1.2011 Actual Date of Delivery: 19.8.2011 Author/Responsible(s): FMI Contributors: FMI: Andrea Vajda, Heikki Tuomenvirta, Pauli, Jokinen, Anna Luomaranta VTT: Lasse Makkonen, Maria Tikanmäki ESSL: Pieter Groenemeijer Foreca: Pirkko Saarikivi CYMET: Silas Michaelides, Matheos Papada- kis, Filippos Tymvios, Spyros Athanasatos Approval of this report: by the EC Summary of this report: Keyword List: WP3, D2, EWENT, extreme weather, transport system, consequences Dissemination level: Public (PU) Grant No. 233919 Version history Version Date Status Author (Partner) Description 1 01.11.2010 1st draft Heikki Tuomenvirta, Andrea outline Vajda, Pauli Jokinen (FMI) 2 13.04.2011 2nd draft Andrea Vajda, Heikki Tuo- first version menvirta, Pauli Jokinen (FMI) 3 10.05.2011 3rd draft Andrea Vajda, Heikki Tuo- nearly complete versi- menvirta, Pauli Jokinen (FMI) on 4 14.05.2011 4th draft Andrea Vajda, Heikki Tuo- complete menvirta, Pauli Jokinen (FMI) 5 01.07.2011 final Andrea Vajda, Heikki Tuo- complete with partners menvirta, Pauli Jokinen (FMI) comments included Distribution list European Commission Ioana-Olga Adamescu EWENT partners E-mail list EWENT Steering Committee E-mail list Website http://ewent.vtt.fi This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS/ETCS) in Finland
    Implementation of the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS/ETCS) in Finland National implementation plan 2017 according to Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/919 2 Table of contents Implementation of the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS/ETCS) in Finland .................................................................. 1 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 4 2 Initial status of the current train protection system .............................. 5 2.1 Train protection system ....................................................................... 5 2.2 Plans for JKV system life-cycle management in the 2020–2030s ....... 6 2.3 Cost-benefit analysis ........................................................................... 7 3 Technical and financial migration strategy .......................................... 9 3.1 Technical migration strategy and overlay on-board ............................ 9 3.1.1 Installation of ERTMS/ETCS on-board subsystems in traction vehicles ....................................................................... 9 3.1.2 Specific aspects of rail traffic in Finland................................... 9 3.1.3 Railway rolling stock installation requirements ...................... 10 3.1 Technical migration strategy and overlay of railway infrastructure trackside installations ........................................................................ 10 3.2.1 Stage 1, pilot in 2020–23 ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pääkaupunkiraiteita Raideverkon Kehittämisen Ideoita Helsingin Seudulle
    PÄÄKAUPUNKIRAITEITA RAIDEVERKON KEHITTÄMISEN IDEOITA HELSINGIN SEUDULLE SUY C: 3/2009 T:mi Kiskos Julkaisija KUVAILULEHTI HELSINGIN KAUPUNKI Julkaisun päivämäärä HKL-liikelaitos Suunnitteluyksikkö 20.3.2009 Tekijä(t) Seppo Vepsäläinen, Kiskos Julkaisun nimi Pääkaupunkiraiteita - Raideverkon kehittämisen ideoita Helsingin seudulle Tiivistelmä Helsingin seudun raideverkon laajentaminen ja seudun kasvu ovat välttämättä rinnakkaisia prosesse- ja. Raideliikenteen lisäämisestä ollaan laajalti yksimielisiä. Uusi liikennejärjestelmän suunnittelukierros (HLJ) on käynnistynyt seudun 14 kunnan alueella. Laajemmin kuin ennen Helsingin kasvun suuntaa- misen kysymyksiä pohditaan kuntien ja valtion yhteistyönä. Näyttää siltä, että kohtuullisin 100-150 M€:n vuotuisin investointipanoksin raideverkkoon seudulle on saatavissa nykyistä palvelua selvästi parempi joukkoliikenne muutaman vuosikymmenen aikajänteellä. Selvityksessä tehtyjen karkeiden toiminnallisten ja taloudellisten arvioiden perusteella kannattaviksi rai- deverkon kehittämistavoiksi osoittautuivat sekä toisen metrolinjan jatkaminen Pasilasta Maunulan ja lentoaseman kautta Tuusulaan että toisen metrolinjan haaroittaminen Pasilasta myös Viikin suuntaan. Viikin suunnan haara palvelisi matkustajia edelleen paremmin, mikäli metrorata jatketaan Viikistä Itä- keskukseen, jolloin Vuosaaren nykyinen metroyhteys muuttuisikin Pasilan kautta keskustaan tulevaksi linjaksi (Vuosaari - Itäkeskus - Viikki - Pasila - Kamppi). Selvityksen perusteella metro- ja kaupunkirataliikenteen integraatiolla voidaan saada
    [Show full text]