DOCSLIB.ORG

Proto-Kuki-Chin by Kenneth Vanbik BS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proto-Kuki-Chin by Kenneth Vanbik BS Proto-Kuki-Chin bY Kenneth VanBik B.S. (University of Yangon, Burma) 1985 M.A. (American Bapt. Sem. of the West, Berkeley) 1993 M.A. (University of California, Berkeley) 2000 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor James A. Matisoff, Chair Professor Gary Holland Professor Ian Maddieson Professor Johanna Nichols Spring 2006 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1 Abstract Proto-Kuki-Chin by Kenneth VanBik Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley Professor James A. Matisoff, Chair The Kuki-Chin languages constitute one of the most important subgroups of the great Tibeto-Burman family. This dissertation attempts to reconstruct the sound system of the ancestor language, Proto-Kuki-Chin, by comparing the initial consonants, rhymes, and nominal tones of a large number of KC languages. This study of Proto-Kuki-Chin depends primarily on twelve languages: three from the Central Chin group: Mizo (aka Lushai), Hakha Lai, and Falam Lai; four from the Southem- Plains Chin group: Mindat Cho, Daai, Asho (aka Plains Chin), and Khumi; four from the Northern Chin group: Tedim (aka Tiddim), Paite, Thado-Kuki, and Sizang; and finally one from the Maraic group, namely Mara (aka Lakher). Chapter 1 introduces the Kuki-Chin speakers and their geographical locations, and traces the etymologies of the names Kuki and Chin. Chapter 2 investigates the historical depth of the separation of the Kuki-Chin family from the rest of Tibeto-Burman, and confirms the unity of the Kuki-Chin peoples through the study of shared sound changes and syntactic patterns. It also deals with the internal subgrouping of Kuki-Chin, based on these patterns of sound change, with shared innovations suggesting common history. For instance, the modem Northern and Southem- Plains Chin groups share a sound change of fortition in which the sound reconstructed as *r for the hypothetical Proto-Kuki-Chin language became a voiced stop /g/ in Northern and Southem-Plains Chin whereas it remained /r/ elsewhere. This indicates that, despite their present geographical separation, these languages share a closer history with each other than they do with the Central Chin group which now divides them geographically. From this we can infer something about earlier movements of populations in the Chin area. Thus this Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. chapter presents a subgrouping schema for Proto-Kuki-Chin: a Peripheral group which includes Southem-Plains-Chin and Northern (Zo) Chin; a Central Chin group; and a highly divergent Maraic group. Chapter 3 presents the PKC syllable canon, and Chapter 4 establishes the PKC initial consonants by comparing copious lexical data from the three subgroups, and gives examples of reconstructed etyma. A total of 1355 PKC etyma have been reconstructed. Chapter 5 seeks to reconstruct PKC etyma in terms of their rhymes. The term “rhyme” in Sino-Tibetan linguistics refers to the phonological material of the whole syllable except for the initial consonants, i.e. the vowel of the syllable plus the final consonant if any. Chapter 6 investigates the nature of the nominal tone system that the proto-language may have had. Four contrastive proto-tones have been reconstructed for smooth syllables; three proto-tones are reconstructed for etyma with stopped rhymes and long vowels, and a single proto-tone for stopped rhymes with short vowels. The concluding chapter (Chapter 7) summarizes and tabulates the types of sound changes which have been discovered in the course of this investigation. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. To the Kuki-Chin people (past and present) who have chosen to preserve their languages in the midst of endangerment this dissertation is dedicated with gratitude and love Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Abbreviations: I Form-I verb II Form-II verb III Form-Ill verb INV Invariant verb AssB A and B are allofams A?i??B A and B are perhaps allofams A&B A and B are not allofams Bn Bound nominal By Bound verbal BSO(A)S Bulletin of the School of Oriental (and African) Studies (London) CKC Central-Kuki-Chin Clf Classifier ERG Ergative Marker FL Falam Lai (aka Zahao) GSTC Matisoff 1985: “God and the Sino-Tibetan Copula”. HL Hakha Lai HPTB Matisoff 2003 . Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman ICSTLL International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics ILCAA Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa (Tokyo) JAAS Journal of Asian and African Studies (Tokyo) JAM James A. Matisoff JFL Laidailova 1995: English-Lushai Dictionary KLT Khoi Lam Thang KM Khumi KVB Kenneth VanBik LSI Linguistic Survey of India LTB A Linguistics of The Tibeto-Burman Area MB Modern Burmese MC Mindat Cho MS Manuscript MZ Mizo (aka Lushai) NEG Negative Marker NKC Northem-Kuki-Chin Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. NOM Nominalizer OB Old Burmese OPWSTBL 1 Becker, ed. 1969: Occoasional Papers of the Wolfenden Society on Tibeto-Burman Linguistics OPWSTBL 2 Lehman, ed. 1971: Occoasional Papers of the Wolfenden Society on Tibeto-Burman Linguistics Pn Noun particle Pv Verb particle PC Personal communication PCC Proto-Central-Chin PKC Proto-Kuki-Chin PLB Proto-Lolo-Burmese PM Proto-Maraic PNC Proto-Northem-Chin PNN Proto-Northem-Naga POS Possessive PPC Proto-Peripheral-Chin (PNC and PSPC) PPPB Luce 1985: Phases o f Pre-Pagan Burma: languages and history, Vol. II PRPC Khoi Lam Thang 2001: A Phonological Reconstruction of Proto Chin PSPC Proto-Southem-Plains-Chin PTB Proto-Tibeto-Burman QST Question Marker S Subject SELAF Societe d’Etudes Linguistiques et Anthropologiques de France SG Singular SPKC Southem-Plains-Kuki-Chin STC Benedict 1972: Sino-Tibetan: A Conspectus SZ Sizang TD Tedim (aka Tiddim) TH Thien Haokip (Thado-Kuki consultant) TK Thado Kuki WB Written Burmese WT Written Tibetan Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Acknowledgments First and foremost, I would like to thank the Berkeley Linguistics Department which has allowed me to shape my linguistic pursuits during the last eight years. Without the support from faculty, staff, and colleagues in the department, it would have been impossible to complete this dissertation. I am most grateful to members my dissertation committee: James A. Matisoff ("Jim"), my teacher, advisor, mentor, employer, and above all friend, whose guidance has been indispensible for the creation of Proto-Kuki-Chin, and who has always been ready to provide painstaking assistance throughout the process of its formation. This dissertation and Kuki-Chin studies in general have benefitted tremendously not only from Jim's intellectual resources, but also from his endless passion for documenting understudied languages. Special thanks are also due to Gary Holland, who always gives insightful comments which ensure the integrity of the materials, and who is always willing to help graduate students along as they struggle through graduate school; Ian Maddieson, whose enthusiasm never fails to inspire students in their collection of data, and whose works on the phonetics of H. Lai and Khumi have greatly benefitted this dissertation; and Johanna Nichols, who appreciates all kinds of linguistic work, and always sees the potential contribution that any language can offer to the world of linguistic typology. Her insightful probing has truly improved the quality of this dissertation. I am also thankful to Larry Hyman, my phonology teacher and co-fieldworker, whose tireless work on the tones of Hakha Lai, Falam Lai, Thado Kuki, and Thlantlang Lai (a dialect of Hakha Lai) has contributed so much to our understanding of tonal patterns in Kuki-Chin languages. I also would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to Andreas Kathol, whose work on Hakha Lai syntax has significantly clarified the syntactic function of verbal stem alternation. This dissertation owes a great deal to the insights of many Kuki-Chin linguists such as George Bedell, Albert Ceu Hlun, Lalnunthangi Chhangte, Khoi Lam Thang, F. K. Lehman, Thlasui Tluangneh, to name a few. This dissertation is in essence a product of linguistic "fieldwork" done in Berkeley. It began with a year-long Field Methods class that Jim conducted in 1996-1997 where H. Lai was the object of study. I was very fortunate to be the consultant for that class. A noteworthy result of that course was the publication of a rich collection of articles on H. Lai linguistics, which appeared in two volumes, in the journal Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area (1997-1998, Vol. 20.2 and 21.1). I am very grateful to all the students in that course (Jonathan Barnes, Darya Kavitskaya, Jason Patent, David Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. V Peterson, Rungpat Roengpitya, and Tomoko Yamashita Smith) who patiently endured my probing of their explanations regarding various linguistic phenomena in H. Lai in the course of their investigations into many aspects of Lai linguistics. Most significantly, the H. Lai Field Methods class has produced one of the most distinguished Kuki-Chin linguists, David A. Peterson (now at Dartmouth college, NH), a morpho-syntactician who specializes in the "applicative" construction. Having worked on H. Lai, one of the most conservative KC languages, he continued to do field linguistics on Sourthern Chin languages such as Hyaw and Khumi, among many others. This dissertation profits enormously from David's copious data on Khumi. Studies on KC linguistics continued at Berkeley with another Field Methods class on Thado Kuki under the leadership of Larry Hyman and Lynn Nichols.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 2 Language Use in Nepal
    CHAPTER 2 LANGUAGE USE IN NEPAL Yogendra P. Yadava* Abstract This chapter aims to analyse the use of languages as mother tongues and second lan- guages in Nepal on the basis of data from the 2011 census, using tables, maps, and figures and providing explanations for certain facts following sociolinguistic insights. The findings of this chapter are presented in five sections. Section 1 shows the impor- tance of language enumeration in censuses and also Nepal’s linguistic diversity due to historical and typological reasons. Section 2 shows that the number of mother tongues have increased considerably from 92 (Census 2001) to 123 in the census of 2011 due to democratic movements and ensuing linguistic awareness among Nepalese people since 1990. These mother tongues (except Kusunda) belong to four language families: Indo- European, Sino-Tibetan, Austro-Asiatic and Dravidian, while Kusunda is a language isolate. They have been categorised into two main groups: major and minor. The major group consists of 19 mother tongues spoken by almost 96 % of the total population, while the minor group is made up of the remaining 104 plus languages spoken by about 4% of Nepal’s total population. Nepali, highly concentrated in the Hills, but unevenly distributed in other parts of the country, accounts for the largest number of speakers (44.64%). Several cross-border, foreign and recently migrated languages have also been reported in Nepal. Section 3 briefly deals with the factors (such as sex, rural/ urban areas, ethnicity, age, literacy etc.) that interact with language. Section 4 shows that according to the census of 2011, the majority of Nepal’s population (59%) speak only one language while the remaining 41% speak at least a second language.
    [Show full text]
  • 7=SINO-INDIAN Phylosector
    7= SINO-INDIAN phylosector Observatoire Linguistique Linguasphere Observatory page 525 7=SINO-INDIAN phylosector édition princeps foundation edition DU RÉPERTOIRE DE LA LINGUASPHÈRE 1999-2000 THE LINGUASPHERE REGISTER 1999-2000 publiée en ligne et mise à jour dès novembre 2012 published online & updated from November 2012 This phylosector comprises 22 sets of languages spoken by communities in eastern Asia, from the Himalayas to Manchuria (Heilongjiang), constituting the Sino-Tibetan (or Sino-Indian) continental affinity. See note on nomenclature below. 70= TIBETIC phylozone 71= HIMALAYIC phylozone 72= GARIC phylozone 73= KUKIC phylozone 74= MIRIC phylozone 75= KACHINIC phylozone 76= RUNGIC phylozone 77= IRRAWADDIC phylozone 78= KARENIC phylozone 79= SINITIC phylozone This continental affinity is composed of two major parts: the disparate Tibeto-Burman affinity (zones 70= to 77=), spoken by relatively small communities (with the exception of 77=) in the Himalayas and adjacent regions; and the closely related Chinese languages of the Sinitic set and net (zone 79=), spoken in eastern Asia. The Karen languages of zone 78=, formerly considered part of the Tibeto-Burman grouping, are probably best regarded as a third component of Sino-Tibetan affinity. Zone 79=Sinitic includes the outer-language with the largest number of primary voices in the world, representing the most populous network of contiguous speech-communities at the end of the 20th century ("Mainstream Chinese" or so- called 'Mandarin', standardised under the name of Putonghua). This phylosector is named 7=Sino-Indian (rather than Sino-Tibetan) to maintain the broad geographic nomenclature of all ten sectors of the linguasphere, composed of the names of continental or sub-continental entities.
    [Show full text]
  • A Faith-Driven Protocol on Gratitude, Forgiveness, and Stress for Chin
    A FAITH-DRIVEN PROTOCOL ON GRATITUDE, FORGIVENESS, AND STRESS FOR CHIN REFUGEES FROM BURMA: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY by Sally Goh Liberty University A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Liberty University February 2017 A FAITH-DRIVEN PROTOCOL ON GRATITUDE, FORGIVENESS, AND STRESS FOR CHIN REFUGEES FROM BURMA: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY by Sally Goh A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA 2017 APPROVED BY: _____________________________ Fernando Garzon, Ph.D., Committee Chair _____________________________ Joy Mwendwa, Ph.D., Committee Member _____________________________ Melvin Pride, Ph.D., Committee Member ii ABSTRACT The influx of immigrants from a diverse cultural and religious tradition into the United States has renewed counselors’ and researchers' interest in how collectivistic populations from a refugee background experience pre-settlement and post-settlement stress in this country. Refugees who have experienced trauma before their settlement are more likely to experience increasing psychiatric pressure from daily stressors such as language barriers, employment difficulties, familial and generational conflicts, and dwindling psychosocial support. However, some refugee populations, such as the Chin people from Burma, have a low-uptake of help-seeking for their psychological problems, leading to more insufficient adjustment to the host culture. Since the Christian faith and the exercise of spiritual disciplines play a critical role in the mental and subjective health of the Chin population, this researcher conducted a workshop to teach a faith- driven approach (also known as GRACE). This exploratory study will describe the development, rationale, and implementation of the protocol.
    [Show full text]
  • Report, Part-I, Vol-XII, Burma
    CENSUS OF INDIA, 1901. VOLUME XII. BURMA. PART I. REPORT. BY C. C. LOWIS, OF THE INDIAN CIVIL SERVICE, SUPERINTENDENT, CENSUS OPERATIONS. RANGOON: OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF GOVERNMENT PRINTING, BURMA. 19 02 • PREFACE. I FIND it impossible to place adequatelY on record my acknow­ ledgments to those who have laboured with me in the preparation of this Report. To review the proofs as a connected whole is to realize, to an overwhelming degree, how much I am beholden to others and to take the measure of my indebtedness is to be seized with an uneasy sense of the hopelessness of attempting to compound, even. to the scC!-n­ tiest extent, with all of my many creditors. I must leave it to the pages of the Report itself to bear grateful testimony to my obli­ gations. A glance at the language chapter will tell how shadowy a production it would have been wIthout the benefit 9f Dr. Grierson's erudition. Every paragraph of the caste, tribe and race chapter will show with how lavish .a hand I have drawn upon Sir George Scott for my material. I would, however, take this opportunity of specially thanking Dr. Cushing and Mr. Taw Sein Kho, who have responded more than generously to my appeals for assistance and advice. '1 he greater part of the Report has been shown to Mr. Eales, and it is to his ripe experience that I am indebted for hints which have led me to alter portions. To Mr. Regan, Superintendent of Government Printing, my thanks are due for having, in the face of sudden and quite excep­ tional difficulties, succeeded in passing this volume through the Press without undue delay.
    [Show full text]
  • Outreach February 2015 Text 12
    OF BLESSING Focus : Ministry in Krishnagiri & Hosur CHANNELS 2015 Y FEBRUAR For private circulation only ailoring Class students omen’s Retreat Personal Evangelism Field W Children enjoying their Sunday school Dodagannpalli T A new life begins Making our children computer savvy Our missionary sharing the good news Dorcas tailoring students with their sponsors Enrich your family prayer time or February 2015 Vol. XLXI No 2 st f mu rary A Lib our FOUNDER Magazine Statement y Late Rev. Dr. Theodore Williams CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD “ To inform our readers and create an Mr. Prem James Family prayer time is the foundation HONORARY TREASURER interest in missions and impact them to Mr. K.P. Rajasekhar get involved in IEM’s missionary work for Christian living. Be blessed by GENERAL SECRETARY and mission in general” Rev. P. John Wesley using Utmost for his Highest a ASSOCIATE GENERAL SECRETARY Rev. Dr. Raja Singh Elias Contents devotional book for everyday by Heads of Ministry Departments Oswald Chambers. Copies of Church Ministries Opening Lines 2 Mr. Jenny Christopher vernacular translations in Hindi, Administration The General Secretary's thoughts 3 Rev. Jackin Isravel Bible Study 5 Marathi, Malayalam, Oriya, Telugu, Human Resorce Rev. Jonathan Chavan Founder’s Day Special 8 Kannada, Tamil, Khasi and in Gujarati Finance are also available. Mr. Solomon Swami Doss Finding Love 10 Field Ministries Praise and Prayer Calendar 11 Mr. Wilfred Kirivasan Publication Secretary In Heaven’s Shores 19 Mr. Timothy Austin Come, Sing Along ! Editor Examination
    [Show full text]
  • University of California Press (University of California, Office of the President)
    University of California Press (University of California, Office of the President) Year Paper vol Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and Philosophy of Sino-Tibetan Reconstruction James A. Matisoff University of California, Berkeley This paper is posted at the eScholarship Repository, University of California. http://repositories.cdlib.org/ucpress/ucpl/vol 135 Copyright c 2003 by the author. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and Philosophy of Sino-Tibetan Reconstruction Abstract This 800-page volume is a clear and readable presentation of the current state of research on the history of the Tibeto-Burman (TB) language family, a typologically diverse group of over 250 languages spoken in Southern China, the Himalayas, NE India, and peninsular Southeast Asia. The TB languages are the only proven relatives of Chinese, with which they form the great Sino-Tibetan family. The exposition is systematic, treating the reconstruction of all the elements of the TB proto-syllable in turn, including initial consonants (Ch. III), prefixes (Ch. IV), monophthongal and diphthongal rhymes (Ch. V), final nasals (Ch. VII), final stops (Ch. VIII), final liquids (Ch. IX), root-final *-s (Ch. X), suffixes (Ch. XI). Particular attention is paid to variational phenomena at all historical levels (e.g. Ch. XII “Allofamic variation in rhymes”). This Handbook builds on the best previous scholarship, and adds up-to-date material that has accumulated over the past 30 years. It contains reconstruc- tions of over a thousand Tibeto-Burman roots, as well as suggested comparisons with several hundred Chinese etyma. It is liberally indexed and cross-referenced for maximum accessibility and internal consistency.
    [Show full text]
  • Asho Daniel Tignor
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects January 2018 A Phonology Of Hill (kone-Tu) Asho Daniel Tignor Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Recommended Citation Tignor, Daniel, "A Phonology Of Hill (kone-Tu) Asho" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 2364. https://commons.und.edu/theses/2364 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A PHONOLOGY OF HILL (KONE-TU) ASHO by Daniel Tignor Bachelor of Science, Harding University, 2005 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Grand Forks, North Dakota August 2018 i PERMISSION Title A Phonology of Hill (Kone-Tu) Asho Department Linguistics Degree Master of Arts In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a graduate degree from the University of North Dakota, I agree that the library of this University shall make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for extensive copying for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor who supervised my thesis work or, in his absence, by the chairperson of the department or the dean of the Graduate School. It is understood that any copying or publication or other use of this thesis or part thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Art of Not Being Governed
    they lack the substance: a taxpaying subject population or di- rect control over their constituent units, let alone a standing army. Hill polities are, almost invariably, redistributive, com- petitive feasting systems held together by the benefits they are able to disburse. When they occasionally appear to be rela- The Art of Not Being tively centralized, they resemble what Barfield has called the Governed “shadow-empires” of nomadic pastoralists, a predatory periph- ery designed to monopolize trading and raiding advantages at An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia the edge of an empire. They are also typically parasitic inthe sense that when their host-empires collapse, so do they.45 James C. Scott Zones of Refuge There is strong evidence that Zomia is not simply a region of resistance to valley states, but a region of refuge as well.46 By “refuge,” I mean to imply that much of the population in the hills has, for more than a millennium and a half, come there to evade the manifold afflictions of state-making projects in the valleys. Far from being “left behind” by the progress of civiliza- 45 Thomas Barfield, “The Shadow Empires: Imperial State Formation along the Chinese-Nomad Frontier,” in Empires: Perspectives from Archaeol- ogy and History, ed. Susan E. Alcock, Terrance N. D’Altroy, et al. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 11–41. Karl Marx identified such para- sitic, militarized peripheries engaged in slave-raiding and plunder on the fringe of the Roman Empire as “the Germanic mode of production.” For the best account of such secondary state formation by the Wa people, see Mag- nus Fiskesjö, “The Fate of Sacrifice and the Making of Wa History,” Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Naga Language Groups Within the Tibeto-Burman Language Family
    TheNaga Language Groups within the Tibeto-Burman Language Family George van Driem The Nagas speak languages of the Tibeto-Burman fami­ Ethnically, many Tibeto-Burman tribes of the northeast ly. Yet, according to our present state of knowledge, the have been called Naga in the past or have been labelled as >Naga languages< do not constitute a single genetic sub­ >Naga< in scholarly literature who are no longer usually group within Tibeto-Burman. What defines the Nagas best covered by the modern more restricted sense of the term is perhaps just the label Naga, which was once applied in­ today. Linguistically, even today's >Naga languages< do discriminately by Indo-Aryan colonists to all scantily clad not represent a single coherent branch of the family, but tribes speaking Tibeto-Burman languages in the northeast constitute several distinct branches of Tibeto-Burman. of the Subcontinent. At any rate, the name Naga, ultimately This essay aims (1) to give an idea of the linguistic position derived from Sanskrit nagna >naked<, originated as a titu­ of these languages within the family to which they belong, lar label, because the term denoted a sect of Shaivite sadhus (2) to provide a relatively comprehensive list of names and whose most salient trait to the eyes of the lay observer was localities as a directory for consultation by scholars and in­ that they went through life unclad. The Tibeto-Burman terested laymen who wish to make their way through the tribes labelled N aga in the northeast, though scantily clad, jungle of names and alternative appellations that confront were of course not Hindu at all.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LANGUAGES of MANIPUR: a CASE STUDY of the KUKI-CHIN LANGUAGES* Pauthang Haokip Department of Linguistics, Assam University, Silchar
    Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area Volume 34.1 — April 2011 THE LANGUAGES OF MANIPUR: A CASE STUDY OF THE KUKI-CHIN LANGUAGES* Pauthang Haokip Department of Linguistics, Assam University, Silchar Abstract: Manipur is primarily the home of various speakers of Tibeto-Burman languages. Aside from the Tibeto-Burman speakers, there are substantial numbers of Indo-Aryan and Dravidian speakers in different parts of the state who have come here either as traders or as workers. Keeping in view the lack of proper information on the languages of Manipur, this paper presents a brief outline of the languages spoken in the state of Manipur in general and Kuki-Chin languages in particular. The social relationships which different linguistic groups enter into with one another are often political in nature and are seldom based on genetic relationship. Thus, Manipur presents an intriguing area of research in that a researcher can end up making wrong conclusions about the relationships among the various linguistic groups, unless one thoroughly understands which groups of languages are genetically related and distinct from other social or political groupings. To dispel such misconstrued notions which can at times mislead researchers in the study of the languages, this paper provides an insight into the factors linguists must take into consideration before working in Manipur. The data on Kuki-Chin languages are primarily based on my own information as a resident of Churachandpur district, which is further supported by field work conducted in Churachandpur district during the period of 2003-2005 while I was working for the Central Institute of Indian Languages, Mysore, as a research investigator.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Fifth Annual Report Annual Report 2017-18
    TWENTY FFIFTHIFTH ANNUAL REPORT 20172017----18181818 ASSAM UNIVERSITY Silchar Accredited by NAAC with B grade with a CGPS OF 2.92 TWENTY-FIFTH ANNUAL REPORT 2017-18 REPORT 2017-18 ANNUAL TWENTY-FIFTH ANNUAL REPORT 2017-18 PUBLISHED BY INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE CELL, ASSAM UNIVERSITY, SILCHAR Annual Report 2017-18 ASSAM UNIVERSITY th 25 ANNUAL REPORT (2017-18) Report on the working of the University st st (1 April, 2017 to 31 March, 2018) Assam University Silchar – 788011 www.aus.ac.in Compiled and Edited by: Internal Quality Assurance Cell Assam University, Silchar | i Annual Report 2017-18 STATUTORY POSITIONS OF THE UNIVERSITY (As on 31.3.2018) Visitor : Shri Pranab Mukherjee His Excellency President of India Chief Rector : Shri Jagdish Mukhi His Excellency Governor of Assam Chancellor : Shri Gulzar Eminent Lyricist and Poet Vice-Chancellor : Prof Dilip Chandra Nath Deans of Schools: (As on 31.3.2018) Prof. G.P. Pandey : Abanindranath Tagore School of Creative Arts & Communication Studies Prof. Asoke Kr. Sen : Albert Einstein School of Physical Sciences Prof. Nangendra Pandey : Aryabhatta School of Earth Sciences Prof. Geetika Bagchi : Ashutosh Mukhopadhyay School of Education Prof. Sumanush Dutta : Deshabandhu Chittaranjan School of Legal Studies Prof. Dulal Chandra Roy : E. P Odum School of Environmental Sciences Prof. Supriyo Chakraborty : Hargobind Khurana School of Life Sciences Prof. Debasish Bhattacharjee : Jadunath Sarkar School of Social Sciences Prof. Apurbananda Mazumdar : Jawarharlal Nehru School of Management Prof. Niranjan Roy : Mahatma Gandhi School of Economics and Commerce Prof. W. Raghumani Singh : Rabindranath Tagore School of Indian Languages and Cultural Studies Prof. Subhra Nag : Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan School of Philosophical Studies Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Topic Reasons of Church Split
    THE SCHOOL OF MISSION AND THEOLOGY (MHS) THESIS TOPIC REASONS OF CHURCH SPLIT AMONG CHIN MIGRANT CHURCHES IN STAVANGER THESIS FOR MASTER OF GLOBAL STUDIES SUBMITTED BY THAWNG HLEI THANG STAVANGER, NORWAY MAY 8, 2015 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENT……………………………………………………………………..2 ACKNOWLWDGEMENT………………………………………………………………….6 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS……………………………………………………………….7 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………….9 1.1 Theme of the Thesis…………………………………………………………………..9 1.2 Research Overview …………………………………………………………………10 1.3 Research Problems…………………………………………………………………..11 1.4 Research Design and Structure of Thesis…………………………………………....12 CHAPTER TWO: THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE………………………………………14 2.1 Introduction …………………………………………………………………………..14 2.2. Value…………………………………………………………………………………14 2.3 Cultural Differences…………………………………………………………………..15 2.4 Conformity versus Affirmation………………………………………………….. …..15 2.5 Power………………………………………………………………………………….16 CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH……………………………….. 18 3.1 Qualitative Research Method…………………………………………………………18 3.2 Selecting the Informants………………………………………………………………19 3.3 The Interviews………………………………………………………………………..19 3.4 Participant Observation………………………………………………………………20 3.5 Analysis of Material………………………………………………………………….21 3.6 Role of Researcher……………………………………………………………….…. 21 2 3.7 Ethical Consideration…………………………………………………………… 22 3.8 Reliability and Validity ……………………………………………………………22 CHAPTER FOUR: BACKGROUND OF LAI-SPEAKING CHIN IN NORWAY………24 4.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………24 4.2 A Brief Historical
    [Show full text]