Chapter 1 Analysis British Dealings with the Tumultuous Situation Created in Danubian Europe at the End of the War and The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 1 Analysis British Dealings with the Tumultuous Situation Created in Danubian Europe at the End of the War and The GREAT BRITAIN, THE LITTLE ENTENTE AND SECURITY IN DANUBIAN EUROPE, 1919-1936 Dragan Bakić Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Ph.D The University of Leeds School of History December 2010 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the works of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. The right of Dragan Bakić to be indentified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Acts 1988. 2010 The University of Leeds Dragan Bakić Acknowledgements The debts I have incurred over the last few years researching and writing my thesis are numerous. None of it would have been possible without the scholarship I received from the Overseas Research Student Award Scheme which was supplemented by School of History’s maintenance grant. My greatest gratitude thus goes to the financial benefactors. In terms of academic help and guidance I am immensely thankful to my mentors. Professor John Gooch supervised me almost until the end of my work but he could not see me through the very last stage due to his retirement. My research under his supervision was a singularly fortunate experience on account of his endless historical knowledge, the stimulating and broad-minded manner in which he discussed different aspect of my work and invariably induced me to take the wider perspective of an academic dilemma at hand. Dr Geoffrey Waddington had a somewhat unenviable task to take over the supervision of a student who was fast-approaching the completion of his thesis and was in dire need of comments on the remaining draft chapters and of many answers to tedious technical and other more substantial questions about the preparation of the final version of a dissertation. Nevertheless, he has read the whole of the thesis with meticulous care and provided me with invaluable emendations and suggestions, particularly as to matters of language style and syntax, which are always an issue for anyone writing in a foreign tongue. His help is appreciated more than I can express. During the course of my research I have encountered and drawn upon the professional expertise and kindness of so many members of staff in the archives and libraries where I had a pleasure to work. I am grateful to the archivists in the National Archives, the School of Slavonic and East European Studies in the UCL, the Churchill Archives Centre and the Bodleian Library, as well as to the staff in the Archives of Yugoslavia, the Military Archives and the Archives of Serbian Academy of Arts and Sciences in Belgrade. Last, but not least, I am indebted to all the people in the Brotherton Library for their kind assistance. In order to cope successfully with the trials and tribulations of doctoral candidates’ day-to-day life one must enjoy and rely on the support of his family and friends. In this respect I have been truly blessed. My sister Sladjana, my brother-in-law Dragan and my nephew Miloš Indjin have given me the warmest and most enjoyable family surrounding while my mother Stana rooted for my endeavours from afar, back home in Serbia. It is also my great satisfaction to recall and cherish the moments spent with my inimitable group of friends - Rachael Johnson, Jack Millard, David Newton, Diane McClurg, Jason Crosby and Keven Watts - whose welcome distractions and camaraderie have made my years in Leeds such a unique time. To further stress my gratitude and debt to those who facilitated my work and helped improve what is written in the following pages I want to state in advance that all the deficiencies are mine alone. Abstract This thesis examines British foreign policy towards Danubian Europe from the end of World War One to the Rhineland crisis of 1936 with special reference to security issues. The Foreign Office’s attitude towards the alliance known as the Little Entente, which was comprised of Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia and Romania, is the primary focus of the study, and, by implication, the British outlook on the countries with which the Little Entente was mainly concerned, namely Hungary and, to a lesser extent, Austria and Bulgaria, also features heavily. Danubian Europe presented constant and serious security risks for European peace and stability and, for that reason, contrary to conventional wisdom, it commanded the attention of British diplomacy with a view to appeasing local conflicts. This study looks at the manner in which the Foreign Office perceived and treated the antagonism between the Little Entente and Hungary, on the one hand, and the impact that the former had in connexion with Franco-Italian rivalry in Central/South-Eastern Europe, on the other. With Hitler’s accession to power the Little Entente was viewed in Whitehall in relation to its place in the prospective policy for preserving Austrian independence and containing German aggression in the region. It is suggested here that the British approach to security problems in Danubian Europe had certain permanent features which stemmed from the general British outlook on the new successor states – the members of the Little Entente - founded on the ruins of the Habsburg monarchy. It was the lack of confidence in their stability and permanence, as well as the misperceptions about the motives and intentions of the policies pursued by other Powers towards Central/South-Eastern Europe, which accounted for the apparent sluggishness and ineffectiveness of the Foreign Office’s dealings with security challenges. Table of contents List of Abbreviations Maps Introduction………………………………………………………………………… 1 1. A New Europe or a ‘Balkanised Europe’? the British Dilemma, 1919-1921…… 11 Introduction………………………............................................................................ 11 1.1. The Shaping of the New Europe ……………………………………………....13 1.2. Habsburg Restoration…………………………………………………………..36 1.3. The Formation of the Little Entente……………………………..…………...... 40 1.4. Two Abortive Karlist Putsches………………………………………………....46 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………..50 2. The Attitudes and Calculations Determining British Policy towards Danubian Europe, 1921-1925………………………………52 Introduction……………………………………………………………………….... 52 2.1. The Little Entente Countries: the British Perspective…………………………. 53 2.2. Which Hungarian Government Makes for Stability?…………………………..68 2.3. Security and Money Diplomacy………………………………………………. 78 2.4. The Little Entente and France: a View from Whitehall………………………. 91 2.5. The Franco-Czechoslovak Treaty……………………………………………... 105 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………..114 3. Managing Perpetual Crisis, 1925-1927…………………………………………..117 Introduction………………………………………………………………………… 117 3.1. The Locarno Remedy………………………………………………………...... 118 3.1.1. A Central European Locarno………………………………………... 120 3.1.2. A Balkan Locarno…………………………………………………… 127 3.2. The Albanian Crisis…………………………………………………………….138 3.3. The Tripartite Agreement……………………………………………………....144 3.4. The Struggle over Romania…………………………………………………….147 3.5. The Franco-Yugoslav Treaty………………………………………………….. 150 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………..159 4. The Transitional Years, 1928-1932………………………………………………162 Introduction………………………………………………………………………… 162 4.1. Old Adam’s Ways……………………………………………………………...163 4.2. Yugoslavia and Italy………………………………………………………….. 177 4.3. Uncertain Quantity: a View of the Little Entente…………………………….. 184 4.4 Austria, Anschluss and Economic Alleviation………………………………….189 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………..194 5. The Quest for an Elusive Danubian Security, 1933-1935………………………..197 Introduction……………………………………………………………………….... 197 5.1. New Organisation and New Challenges………………………………………. 198 5.2. Austrian Independence and Danubian Pact…………………………………… 203 5.3. The Balkan Entente……………………………………………………………. 224 5.4. Czechoslovakia: Internal and External German Problem……………………... 231 5.5. The Little Entente and the Soviet Union ……………………………………... 237 5.6. Yugoslavia and Italy…………………………………………………………... 245 5.7. The Rhineland Crisis and Danubian Europe…………………………………... 253 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………. 257 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………. 262 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………….. 276 List of Abbreviations AJ Archives of Yugoslavia A SANU Archives of the Serbian Academy of Arts and Sciences BDFA British Documents on Foreign Affairs DBFP Documents on British Foreign Policy FO Foreign Office IMRO Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organisation VA Military Archives PID Political Intelligence Department SSEES School of Slavonic and East European Studies TNA The National Archives INTRODUCTION British policy towards Danubian Europe during the interwar period remains a strangely understudied area. The region, and Czechoslovakia in particular, is, of course, regularly mentioned in the rich literature about the ‘appeasement policy’ and its culmination at the Munich conference, but its treatment is invariably reduced to the role of a passive object in the Great Powers’ diplomatic trial of strength. Although such a view is not without its justification in the actual course of events, it unfortunately tends to marginalise the need to examine the British attitude towards the region itself, which is without doubt an inseparable part of the entire European jigsaw. There are only a few works which directly address the question of British policy towards Central Europe. Gábor Bátonyi’s work
Recommended publications
  • Elisabeth Crowell and Visiting Nurse Education in Europe, 1917-1925
    Elisabeth Crowell and Visiting Nurse Education in Europe, 1917-1925 By Jaime Lapeyre RN, Ph.D. Candidate University of Toronto Canada [email protected] and By Sioban Nelson RN, Ph.D., FCAHS Dean and Professor, Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing University of Toronto Canada [email protected] © 2011 by Jaime Lapeyre and Sioban Nelson The Rockefeller Foundation’s (RF) Commission for the Prevention of Tuberculosis in France (CPTF) was established in 1917 and included the RF’s first involvement with the training of nurses. During the first few years of the war the RF had formed a War Relief Commission and provided aid to Belgium, Serbia and Poland, as well as other war-ravaged countries, as a result of their continued study of conditions in Europe. Upon the U.S.’s entry into the war, and the formation of the War Council under the American Red Cross, the RF withdrew its War Relief Commission and merged its resources with the Red Cross. One of the areas in most need of help was that of tuberculosis prevention in France. After careful study of this field by Dr. Hermann Biggs, New York State Commissioner of Health, and at the invitation of French authorities, the International Health Board (IHB) of the RF formed the Commission for the Prevention of Tuberculosis in France. The work of the Commission included establishing centers for the training of tuberculosis workers and visiting nurses.1 1 The nurse placed in charge of the Commission’s training program for health visitors was Frances Elisabeth Crowell. Crowell was an American, who after completing her training as a nurse, moved to New York to complete her social work education at the New York School of Philanthropy.
    [Show full text]
  • Building an Unwanted Nation: the Anglo-American Partnership and Austrian Proponents of a Separate Nationhood, 1918-1934
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Carolina Digital Repository BUILDING AN UNWANTED NATION: THE ANGLO-AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP AND AUSTRIAN PROPONENTS OF A SEPARATE NATIONHOOD, 1918-1934 Kevin Mason A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of PhD in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2007 Approved by: Advisor: Dr. Christopher Browning Reader: Dr. Konrad Jarausch Reader: Dr. Lloyd Kramer Reader: Dr. Michael Hunt Reader: Dr. Terence McIntosh ©2007 Kevin Mason ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Kevin Mason: Building an Unwanted Nation: The Anglo-American Partnership and Austrian Proponents of a Separate Nationhood, 1918-1934 (Under the direction of Dr. Christopher Browning) This project focuses on American and British economic, diplomatic, and cultural ties with Austria, and particularly with internal proponents of Austrian independence. Primarily through loans to build up the economy and diplomatic pressure, the United States and Great Britain helped to maintain an independent Austrian state and prevent an Anschluss or union with Germany from 1918 to 1934. In addition, this study examines the minority of Austrians who opposed an Anschluss . The three main groups of Austrians that supported independence were the Christian Social Party, monarchists, and some industries and industrialists. These Austrian nationalists cooperated with the Americans and British in sustaining an unwilling Austrian nation. Ultimately, the global depression weakened American and British capacity to practice dollar and pound diplomacy, and the popular appeal of Hitler combined with Nazi Germany’s aggression led to the realization of the Anschluss .
    [Show full text]
  • Yvon Delbos and Anthony Eden: Anglo-French Cooperation, 1936-38
    1 YVON DELBOS AND ANTHONY EDEN: ANGLO-FRENCH COOPERATION, 1936-38 Glyn Stone Anthony Eden was appointed foreign secretary at the end of 1935 following the dismissal of Sir Samuel Hoare for his part in the infamous Hoare-Laval Pact. Yvon Delbos, a member of the Radical party, became French foreign minister six months later as a result of the victory of the Popular Front in the May 1936 elections. Eden resigned as foreign secretary on 20 February 1938. Delbos followed suit less than four weeks later on 14 March 1938. When he became foreign secretary at the age of thirty eight, Eden was already the ambitious, rising star of the Conservative party and had accumulated an impressive degree of experience in foreign affairs having been parliamentary private secretary to foreign secretary Austen Chamberlain between 1926 and 1929, under secretary of state for foreign affairs from September 1931 until January 1934 when he became lord privy seal, and then in June 1935 minister of league of nations affairs (without portfolio). In comparison, Delbos was far less experienced, as Robert Young has observed: Yvon Delbos went to the Quai d’Orsay in his early fifties, equipped with a respectable if unspectacular reputation as a competent member of the Chamber and as a journalist with special interest in foreign affairs. A quiet, moderate man of modest political ambitions…Significantly, in a political world renowned for its gastronomic and alcoholic excesses, here was one, a curiosity, who did not suffer from liver complaints. But he was not the sort of man from whom one could expect either brilliance or novelty in foreign policy.1 Yet, the two foreign ministers developed a good working relationship and contributed much to the improvement in Anglo-French relations after the Abyssinian debacle and the mutual recrimination of the Rhineland crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Whole Lot, Czechs, Magyars, Poles, Jugos, Roumanians, Should Be Put in a Bag and Shaken up and Then Handed Over to A
    “The whole lot, Czechs, Magyars, Poles, Jugos, Roumanians, should be put in a bag and shaken up and then handed over to a decent Briton to administer.” A Contribution on the British Perception of Czech-German Relations in Czechoslovakia to 1933 Lukáš Novotný INTRODUCTION On 28 October 1918, the “Czechoslovak National Committee’s Proclamation of the In- dependence of the Czechoslovak State” was issued, formally declaring the establish- ment of a new state. At the end of November 1918 the first Czechoslovak President, Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk (TGM), sailed to Great Britain to meet with leading Brit- ish politicians on the future borders of the new state, although the peace conference which was to determine the Czechoslovak borders did not begin until 18 January 1919. TGM thought that London, alongside France, would play an important role in shaping the new state of affairs in Central Europe.1 The establishment of the Czechoslovak state at the end of October 1918 was a re- ality, which British politicians, or rather diplomats at the Foreign Office, would have to learn to work with. One illustration of this is an article entitled All Bohemia for the Czechs which stated that the representatives of the peace treaty had promised Karel Kramář and the future state the whole of historical Bohemia. William Tyrrell at the Foreign Office responded to this by asking whether that meant that the matter of the German areas in the north and west of Bohemia had now been definitively set- tled; he considered this to be of fundamental importance, and events were soon to prove him right.2 In mid-November 1918 in the Revolutionary National Assembly, the first Czechoslovak Prime Minister declared that the new state would not restrict its German citizens in any way in their cultural and language rights, but he also added that the state would be a Czech one.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Erik GOLDSTEIN Professor of International Relations
    curriculum vitae Erik GOLDSTEIN Professor of International Relations, and of History Department of International Relations 152 Bay State Road Boston University Boston, Massachusetts 02215 USA [email protected] EDUCATION 1980-84 Jesus College, University of Cambridge 1984 Ph.D. in History 1978 University of Oslo 1978 Scholarship and Certificate 1977-80 Fletcher School of Law & Diplomacy, Tufts University (combined B.A.-M.A. program). 1980 M.A. in International Affairs 1980 M.A.L.D. (Master of Arts in International Law & Diplomacy) 1980 Fields passed at Ph.D. candidacy level 1) European Diplomatic History and Foreign Policies; 2) Diplomatic History and Foreign Policies of Communist Areas; 3) United States Diplomatic History and Foreign Policy; 4) International Law 1974-78 Tufts College, Tufts University 1979 B.A. summa cum laude (History) and Phi Beta Kappa. 1970-74 Melrose High School 1974 Diploma, highest honors, History Prize, and Scholarship TEACHING EXPERIENCE 1976-80 Tufts University 1976-80 Tutor, Department of History 1981-84 University of Cambridge 1981-84 Supervisor, History of Development of the International System 1984-98 University of Birmingham 1984-87 Lecturer (temporary) in International History 1987-88 Lecturer 'A' in International History 1988-90 Lecturer 'B' in International History 1990-93 Senior Lecturer in International History 1993-97 Reader in International History 1997-98 Professor of International History 1998-present Boston University 1998-present Professor of International Relations (and History, 2005) 1998-2010 Chair, Dept. of International Relations Concurrent Appointments: 1988-94 Associate Member, Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies, University of Birmingham. 1988, 1993 Visiting Scholar, Centre for International Studies, University of Cambridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomarbeit
    DIPLOMARBEIT Titel der Diplomarbeit Anglo-Austrian Cultural Relations between 1944 and 1955. Influences, Cooperation and Conflicts. Verfasserin Isabella Lehner angestrebter akademischer Grad Magistra der Philosophie (Mag. phil.) Wien, im Juli 2011 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 312 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Geschichte Betreuer: Univ.-Prof. Mag. DDr. Oliver Rathkolb 2 Eidesstattliche Erklärung Ich erkläre eidesstattlich, dass ich die Arbeit selbständig angefertigt, keine anderen als die angegebenen Hilfsmittel benutzt und alle aus ungedruckten Quellen, gedruckter Literatur oder aus dem Internet im Wortlaut oder im wesentlichen Inhalt übernommenen Formulierungen und Konzepte gemäß den Richtlinien wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten zitiert, durch Fußnoten gekennzeichnet beziehungsweise mit genauer Quellenangabe kenntlich gemacht habe. Die vorliegende Arbeit wurde bisher weder in gleicher noch in ähnlicher Form einer anderen Prüfungsbehörde vorgelegt und auch noch nicht veröffentlicht. Ort Datum Unterschrift 3 Acknowledgements This thesis owes much to the generosity and cooperation of others. Firstly, I am highly indebted to my supervisor Professor Oliver Rathkolb for his guidance and support. I owe a special thank you to Dr. Jill Lewis and (soon to be PhD) Helen Steele for repeatedly inspiring and encouraging me. Furthermore, I would like to thank Mag. Florentine Kastner for her support. Thank you for a friendship beyond history. Sincere thanks also go to the staff at The National Archives in Kew, and to the Institute of Germanic and Romance Studies at the University of London, especially Dr. Martin Liebscher, for assisting me during my research in London. A very special thank you goes to Raimund! Without your inspiring ideas, support and understanding this thesis would never have been completed. 4 Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Richter Revised
    University of Birmingham 'A mass which you could form into whatever you wanted' Richter, Klaus License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Richter, K 2017, 'A mass which you could form into whatever you wanted': Refugees and state building in Lithuania and Courland, 1914–21. in Europe on the move: Refugees in the era of the Great War. Cultural History of Modern War. Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Checked for eligibility: 03/05/2019 General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources and Select Bibliography
    Sources and Select Bibliography I. OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS (a) Unpublished The Papers of King George V, Royal Archives, Windsor. Conclusions of Meetings of the Cabinet, Public Record Office (P.R.O.), London. Records of Cabinet Ad Hoc Committees, P.R.O. Cabinet Papers and Memoranda, P.R.O. Cabinet: Registered Files, P.R.O. Records of International Conferences, P.R.O. Foreign Office Confidential Prints and General Correspondence, P.R.O. Records of the Prime Minister's Office, P.R.O. German Foreign Ministry Records (photostatic copies held in London at the P.R.O. and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office Library). (b) Published E. L. Woodward and Rohan Butler (eds.), Documents on British Foreign Policy, I9I9-I939 (London, 1946 ff.), 2nd series, various volumes. United States Department of State, Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States (Washington, various years), volumes covering 1929, 1930 and 1931. League of Nations, Official Journal. British Parliamentary Debates (House of Commons and House of Lords). British Command Papers. Labour Party, Labour and the Nation (London, 1928). --,Labour's Appeal to the Nation (London, 1929). --,Arbitration: Tory Record and Labour Policy (London, 1929). Jane Degras (ed.), Soviet Documents on Foreign Policy, 3 vols (London, 1951-3). 2. DIARIES AND PRIVATE PAPERS (a) Unpublished The Papers of Earl Alexander of Hillsborough (deposited at Churchill College, Cambridge). The Papers of Viscount Cecil of Chelwood (deposited at the British Museum). The Papers of Sir Austen Chamberlain (deposited at the University of Birming­ ham Library). A selection covering the period 1929-31 appears in Sir Charles Petrie, The Life and Letters of The Right Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • American Relief Administration. European Operations Records, 1919-1923
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf9779p02m No online items Register of the American Relief Administration. European Operations Records, 1919-1923 Processed by Hoover Institution Archives Staff; machine-readable finding aid created by Michael C. Conkin Hoover Institution Archives Stanford University Stanford, California 94305-6010 Phone: (650) 723-3563 Fax: (650) 725-3445 Email: [email protected] © 1998 Hoover Institution Archives. All rights reserved. Register of the American Relief 23001 1 Administration. European Operations Records, 1919-1923 Register of the American Relief Administration. European Operations Records, 1919-1923 Hoover Institution Archives Stanford University Stanford, California Contact Information Hoover Institution Archives Stanford University Stanford, California 94305-6010 Phone: (650) 723-3563 Fax: (650) 725-3445 Email: [email protected] Processed by: Hoover Institution Archives Staff Date Completed: 1998 Encoded by: Michael C. Conkin © 1998 Hoover Institution Archives. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: American Relief Administration. European Operations Records, Date (inclusive): 1919-1923 Collection number: 23001 Creator: American Relief Administration. European Operations Physical Description: 849 manuscript boxes, 17 oversize boxes, 7 oversize folders(347 linear feet) Repository: Hoover Institution Archives Stanford, California 94305-6010 Abstract: Correspondence, memoranda, reports, appeals, financial records, lists, and press summaries, relating to American relief in Europe following World War I, and food and public health problems, economic conditions, and political and social developments, in Europe. American Relief Administration will be abbreviated throughout description as "ARA" Physical Location: Hoover Institution Archives Language: English. Access Microfilm use only. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Archives. Alternative Form Available Also available on microfilm (980 reels).
    [Show full text]
  • THE FORMULATION of BRITAIN's POLICY TOWARDS EGYPT: 1922-1925 Eugene ROTHMAN a Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philo
    THE FORMULATION OF BRITAIN'S POLICY TOWARDS EGYPT: 1922-1925 Eugene ROTHMAN A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, in the Faculty of Arts, University of London. London, September 1979 ProQuest Number: 10672715 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10672715 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ABSTRACT The years immediately following the First World War were extremely important for the formulation of Britain's policy towards Egypt, a British Protectorate since 1914. In this connection, the years 1922 to 1925, the last years of Lord Allenby's tenure as Britain's High Commissioner in Egypt, were critical. Allenby, who was appointed in 1919 in order to suppress nationalist- inspired rioting in Egypt, adopted a surprising policy of moderation. He soon forced the British government to unilaterally declare Egypt's independence in 1922. This apparent success was followed by the adoption of a modern consti­ tution in Egypt and the British withdrawal from the entanglements of Egypt's administration. Still Allenby's career ended in seeming frustration in 1925: negotiations between Britain and Egypt failed in 1924, to be followed by the assassination of the British Governor General of the Sudan, Sir Lee z' Stack, and Allenby's harsh ultimatum to the Egyptian government in November 1924 effectively reinstituting British control of Egypt's administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    curriculum vitae Erik GOLDSTEIN Professor of International Relations & History Boston University [email protected] EDUCATION 1984 Ph.D. in History, University of Cambridge Examiners: Zara Steiner and Michael Dockrill 1980 M.A.L.D. (Master of Arts in International Law & Diplomacy), Fletcher School of Law & Diplomacy, Tufts University 1980 M.A. in International Affairs, Fletcher School of Law & Diplomacy, Tufts University (combined B.A.-M.A. program). 1979 B.A. summa cum laude (History & Religion), and Phi Beta Kappa, Tufts University 1978 Certificate, University of Oslo. ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 1984-98 University of Birmingham 1984-90 Lecturer (Assistant Professor) in International History 1990-93 Senior Lecturer (Associate Professor) in International History 1993-97 Reader in International History 1997-98 Professor of International History 1998-present Boston University 1998-present Professor of International Relations (and History, 2005) 1998-2010 Chair, Dept. of International Relations (now Pardee School of Global Studies) Visiting Appointments 1988, 1993 Visiting Scholar, Centre for International Studies, University of Cambridge. 1990-91 Secretary of the Navy Senior Research Fellow, U.S. Naval War College. 2009, 2010-11 Visiting Professor, Dept. of History, University of East Anglia. 2018 Honorary Library Fellow, Dr. Williams’s Library, London. 2018 Visitng Professor, Dept. of Political Economy, King’s College, London. Concurrent Appointments: Univesity of Birmingham 1988-94 Associate Member, Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman, and Modern Greek Studies. 1998 Deputy Director, Centre for Studies in Security and Diplomacy. 1999-2009 Hon. Fellow, Center for Studies in Security and Diplomacy. 1999-2009 Hon. Senior Research Fellow, University of Birmingham Concurrent Appointments: Boston Univesity 1999-present Senior Fellow, International History Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • SIR ERIC Drümmûnd, Britaints AMBASSADOR to ITALY, and BRITISH FOREIGN POLICY DURING the ITALO-ABYSSINIAN CRISIS of 1935-1936
    SIR ERIC DRüMMûND, BRITAINtS AMBASSADOR TO ITALY, AND BRITISH FOREIGN POLICY DURING THE ITALO-ABYSSINIAN CRISIS OF 1935-1936 Araceli Julia P. Gelardi B.S., Florida International University, 1982 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of His tory O Araceli Julia P. Gelardi 1998 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY March 1998 Al1 rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other rneans, without permission of the author. National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1*1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Otbwa ON KI A ON4 Canada Canada Your fi& Votre rélérem Our llle Notre reference The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distnier ou copies of this thesis in rnicroform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la foxme de microfiche/fïJm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété ddu copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d7auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts ~omit Ni la thèse ni des exitraits substantiels may be printed or othenivise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. Abs tract This thesis examines the role Britain's Ambassador to Italy, Sir Eric Drummond, played on the formulation of British foreign policy during the Italo-Abyssinian crisis of 1935-6.
    [Show full text]