DOCSLIB.ORG

2018 Jessica Uniack Beach to Bay Race Long Beach Yacht Club

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2018 Jessica Uniack Beach to Bay Race Long Beach Yacht Club 2018 Jessica Uniack Beach to Bay Race Long Beach Yacht Club Results for 2018 Jessica Uniack Beach to Bay Race CFJ Class Sailed: 1, Discards: 0, To count: 1, Entries: 25, Scoring system: Appendix A Class SailNo Club HelmName CrewName R1 Total Nett CFJ HHSF Jack Haliday Nicholas Ridout CFJ HHSF Trae Sanchez Ben Hagadorn CFJ LBYC 7 LBYC Nicky Lech Kai Bramble 1.0 1.0 1.0 CFJ 22 ABYC Nicholas Muller Ulises Lewis 2.0 2.0 2.0 CFJ LBYC 10 LBYC Preston Woodworth Alex Lech 3.0 3.0 3.0 CFJ 43 ABYC Summer Drake Paige Odell 4.0 4.0 4.0 CFJ 23 ABYC Nikhil Stewart Jamarcus Parker 5.0 5.0 5.0 CFJ 42 ABYC Sean colley Thomas Dobson 6.0 6.0 6.0 CFJ 44 ABYC Nicolas Sanchez Nicole Morikawa 7.0 7.0 7.0 CFJ 24 ?? 8.0 8.0 8.0 CFJ 0 HHSF Trae Sanchez Ben H 9.0 9.0 9.0 CFJ LBYC 2 LBYC Kyer Fox Isaure Chalandon 10.0 10.0 10.0 CFJ LBYC 9 LBYC Sawyer Bambam-Moak Katin Cathey 11.0 11.0 11.0 Class SailNo Club HelmName CrewName R1 Total Nett CFJ 46 ABYC Elisabeth Rossbach Troy Davidson 12.0 12.0 12.0 CFJ 00 HHSF Jack Haliday Nicholas 13.0 13.0 13.0 CFJ 41 ABYC Michael Colley Emilia Anctil 14.0 14.0 14.0 CFJ 6161 DPYC Riley Lenthall 15.0 15.0 15.0 CFJ 9PYSF HHYC Jack Busche Nolan Davis 16.0 16.0 16.0 CFJ 1510 DPYC Ryan Brown Colin Sekerka 17.0 17.0 17.0 CFJ 5151 DPYC Christopher Andersen Hunter Laws 18.0 18.0 18.0 CFJ LBYC 3 LBYC Luke Bramble Rio Dumont 19.0 19.0 19.0 CFJ LBYC 5 LBYC Jack Snow Reese Lapham 26.0 DSQ 26.0 26.0 CFJ 6161 DPYC Carsen Lenthall 26.0 DNC 26.0 26.0 CFJ 6161 DPYC Riley Lenthall 26.0 DNC 26.0 26.0 CFJ 5151 DPYC Hunter Laws Christopher Anderson 26.0 DNC 26.0 26.0 CFJ 1 ABYC/VYC Nicholas Mueller 26.0 DNC 26.0 26.0 CFJ 6 NHYC/ABYC Max Zinn Andrew Bond 26.0 DNC 26.0 26.0 Capri Class Sailed: 1, Discards: 0, To count: 1, Entries: 3, Scoring system: Appendix A Class SailNo Club HelmName CrewName R1 Total Nett Capri 2 Leeway Ben & Eli Enzo 1.0 1.0 1.0 Capri 5 Leeway Eliana Eats 2.0 2.0 2.0 Capri 3 Leeway Luke & Issac Clark & Kyle 3.0 3.0 3.0 Laser Full Rig Class Sailed: 1, Discards: 0, To count: 1, Entries: 3, Scoring system: Appendix A Class SailNo Club HelmName CrewName R1 Total Nett Laser Full Rig 47394 Leeway Liam Williams 1.0 1.0 1.0 Laser Full Rig 17 Leeway Colin Bullivant Kai Jorda 2.0 2.0 2.0 Laser Full Rig 178 SLBYC Isaac Sweeney 4.0 DNC 4.0 4.0 Laser Radial Class Sailed: 1, Discards: 0, To count: 1, Entries: 1, Scoring system: Appendix A Class SailNo Club HelmName CrewName R1 Total Nett Laser Radial No Sail # ABYC/VYC William Mueller 1.0 1.0 1.0 Open Bic Class Sailed: 1, Discards: 0, To count: 1, Entries: 7, Scoring system: Appendix A Class SailNo Club HelmName CrewName R1 Total Nett Open Bic 8070 HHSF Ryan Misterly 1.0 1.0 1.0 Open Bic Bic ?? 2.0 2.0 2.0 Class SailNo Club HelmName CrewName R1 Total Nett Open Bic 9129 HHSF Garrett Rini 3.0 3.0 3.0 Open Bic 8416 HHSF Taj Jones 4.0 4.0 4.0 Open Bic 9177 HHSF Siera Schnidler 5.0 5.0 5.0 Open Bic 8950 HHSF Nate Espinoza 6.0 6.0 6.0 Open Bic 7314 ABYC Brynn Jolly 8.0 DNC 8.0 8.0 Opti Champ Fleet Class Sailed: 1, Discards: 0, To count: 1, Entries: 9, Scoring system: Appendix A Class SailNo Club HelmName CrewName R1 Total Nett Opti Champ Fleet 19486 ABYC Gage Christopher 1.0 1.0 1.0 Opti Champ Fleet 13313 ABYC Owen Cuyler 2.0 2.0 2.0 Opti Champ Fleet 17096 ABYC Noah Stapleton 3.0 3.0 3.0 Opti Champ Fleet 19861 ABYC Lucia Len 4.0 4.0 4.0 Opti Champ Fleet 2059 ABYC Tay Drake 5.0 5.0 5.0 Opti Champ Fleet 13443 ABYC Elle Williams 6.0 6.0 6.0 Opti Champ Fleet 18496 ABYC Yolanda Lewis 10.0 DNC 10.0 10.0 Opti Champ Fleet 13313 CBYC Owen Cuyler 10.0 DNC 10.0 10.0 Opti Champ Fleet 17096 CBYC Noah Stapleton 10.0 DNC 10.0 10.0 Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube Class Sailed: 1, Discards: 0, To count: 1, Entries: 24, Scoring system: Appendix A Class SailNo Club HelmName CrewName R1 Total Nett Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube Q HHSF Dane Carlson 1.0 1.0 1.0 Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube 00 ?? 2.0 2.0 2.0 Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube 13581 HHSF Van Carlson 3.0 3.0 3.0 Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube 18255 ABYC Megan Farmer 4.0 4.0 4.0 Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube 22263 ABYC Jordan Culen 5.0 5.0 5.0 Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube 21383 ABYC Elias Barth 6.0 6.0 6.0 Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube 18407 ABYC Christian Culen 7.0 7.0 7.0 Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube 7 ABYC Finn Donahue 8.0 8.0 8.0 Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube 19652 ABYC Fiona Barbeito 9.0 9.0 9.0 Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube 20172 ABYC Lars Williams 10.0 10.0 10.0 Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube 4 HHSF Jake Lux 11.0 11.0 11.0 Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube 3 ABYC Ian MacRae 12.0 12.0 12.0 Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube 14099 ABYC Reef Settlemire 13.0 13.0 13.0 Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube 2 HHSF Matthew Sas 14.0 14.0 14.0 Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube Red 1 ABYC Julia Hudak 15.0 15.0 15.0 Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube 1 ABYC Jack Park 16.0 16.0 16.0 Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube 14 HHSF Hali Aniol 17.0 17.0 17.0 Class SailNo Club HelmName CrewName R1 Total Nett Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube 10 HHSF Alana Dodson 18.0 18.0 18.0 Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube 11 HHSF Houston Aniol 19.0 19.0 19.0 Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube 6 HHSF Jessica Resnikof 25.0 DNC 25.0 25.0 Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube 8 HHSF Peytyn Sanchez 25.0 DNC 25.0 25.0 Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube 7 HHSF Adrian Finn 25.0 DNC 25.0 25.0 Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube 1 HHSF Martin Slack 25.0 DNC 25.0 25.0 Opti Green Fleet/Sail Cube Club Opti ABYC Miles Petrick 25.0 DNC 25.0 25.0 RS Feva Class Sailed: 1, Discards: 0, To count: 1, Entries: 3, Scoring system: Appendix A Class SailNo Club HelmName CrewName R1 Total Nett RS Feva 3448 ABYC Cameron Farmer Steward McCaleb 1.0 1.0 1.0 RS Feva 5911 ABYC Tate Christopher 2.0 2.0 2.0 RS Feva TBD BCYC Autry Rozendal 4.0 DNC 4.0 4.0 Sabot A Class Sailed: 0, Discards: 0, To count: 0, Entries: 1, Scoring system: Appendix A Class SailNo Club HelmName CrewName Total Nett Sabot A HHYC 116 HHSF Dylan Haliday 0.0 0.0 Sabot C1 Class Sailed: 1, Discards: 0, To count: 1, Entries: 4, Scoring system: Appendix A Class SailNo Club HelmName CrewName R1 Total Nett Sabot C1 9861 LBYC SCOTT Pearl 1.0 1.0 1.0 Sabot C1 10155 LBYC CHLOE Pearl 2.0 2.0 2.0 Sabot C1 9303 LBYC Madison Mansour 3.0 3.0 3.0 Sabot C1 LW14 Leeway David Dickson 4.0 4.0 4.0 RS Tera Class Sailed: 1, Discards: 0, To count: 1, Entries: 8, Scoring system: Appendix A Class SailNo Club HelmName CrewName R1 Total Nett RS Tera 3304 DPYC Kate Sweeney 1.0 1.0 1.0 RS Tera 3307 DPYC Audrey Whitney Miller 2.0 2.0 2.0 RS Tera 3303 DPYC Rowan Spates 3.0 3.0 3.0 RS Tera 3301 ABYC Brynn Jolly 4.0 4.0 4.0 RS Tera TBD DPYC Max Bond 9.0 DNC 9.0 9.0 RS Tera 3301 DPYC Jason AShby 9.0 DNC 9.0 9.0 RS Tera 0 DPYC Persephone Spates 9.0 DNC 9.0 9.0 RS Tera TBD DPYC Sophia Whitney Miller 9.0 DNC 9.0 9.0 Sabot C2 Class Sailed: 1, Discards: 0, To count: 1, Entries: 9, Scoring system: Appendix A Class SailNo Club HelmName CrewName R1 Total Nett Sabot C2 8906 LBYC Walter McFarland 1.0 1.0 1.0 Sabot C2 LW19 Leeway William Morris 2.0 2.0 2.0 Sabot C2 8475 LBYC Taylor Carty 3.0 3.0 3.0 Sabot C2 8851 ABYC Victoria Messano 4.0 4.0 4.0 Sabot C2 LW20 Leeway Henry Otey 5.0 5.0 5.0 Sabot C2 5 Leeway Nicolas lackovic 6.0 6.0 6.0 Sabot C2 LW11 Leeway Megan Hickey 7.0 7.0 7.0 Sabot C2 LW004 Leeway Lily Dickson 10.0 DNC 10.0 10.0 Sabot C2 9327 LBYC Kai Bramble 10.0 DNC 10.0 10.0 Sabot C3 Class Sailed: 1, Discards: 0, To count: 1, Entries: 54, Scoring system: Appendix A Class SailNo Club HelmName CrewName R1 Total Nett Sabot C3 8308 ABYC Lillie Hudak 1.0 1.0 1.0 Sabot C3 10173 LBYC Hannah Crompton 2.0 2.0 2.0 Sabot C3 10163 ABYC Alden Brownett 3.0 3.0 3.0 Sabot C3 LW7 Leeway Kaylee Bloeser 4.0 4.0 4.0 Sabot C3 101 ABYC Cole Barth 5.0 5.0 5.0 Class SailNo Club HelmName CrewName R1 Total Nett Sabot C3 LW001 Leeway Evan Ballow 6.0 6.0 6.0 Sabot C3 6030 SLBYC Liam Boukris 7.0 7.0 7.0 Sabot C3 LW6 Leeway Alexander Hu 8.0 8.0 8.0 Sabot C3 7087 LBYC Sophia corzine 9.0 9.0 9.0 Sabot C3 9956 SLBYC Aiden Seitz 10.0 10.0 10.0 Sabot C3 LW12 Leeway Elicia Miller Richmond 11.0 11.0 11.0 Sabot C3 9230 LBYC Andrew Lonergan 12.0 12.0 12.0 Sabot C3 LW3 Leeway Carter Ballow 13.0 13.0 13.0 Sabot C3 R1 LBYC Jack McGhie 14.0 14.0 14.0 Sabot C3 LW10 Leeway Marlo Ballou 15.0 15.0 15.0 Sabot C3 007 LBYC Haley Pando 16.0 16.0 16.0 Sabot C3 9834 Leeway Morgan Zimmerman 17.0 17.0 17.0 Sabot C3 10118 LBYC Melia Lapham 18.0 18.0 18.0 Sabot C3 4747 LBYC Patrick Carey 19.0 19.0 19.0 Sabot C3 10254 LBYC Olivia corzine 20.0 20.0 20.0 Sabot C3 1420 SLBYC Brady Bertrang 21.0 21.0 21.0 Sabot C3 9527 LBYC Zachary Seibert 22.0 22.0 22.0 Class SailNo Club HelmName CrewName R1 Total Nett Sabot C3 9958 SLBYC Luke Seitz 23.0 23.0 23.0 Sabot C3 LW4 SLBYC Sebastian Garcia 24.0 24.0 24.0 Sabot C3 8516 LBYC William Turner 25.0 25.0 25.0 Sabot C3 3374 LBYC Matthew Thompson 26.0 26.0 26.0 Sabot C3 9957 SLBYC Kai Banua 27.0 27.0 27.0 Sabot C3 9864 SLBYC Claire Williams 28.0 28.0 28.0 Sabot C3 LW8 Leeway Luke Deeble 29.0 29.0 29.0 Sabot C3 8855 LBYC Skylar Elias 30.0 30.0 30.0 Sabot C3 181 LBYC Ainsley Kuhne 31.0 31.0 31.0 Sabot C3 LW3 Leeway Kasen Rivers 32.0 32.0 32.0 Sabot C3 LW2 Leeway Xochil Soto Ryan 33.0 33.0 33.0 Sabot C3 8966 SLBYC Forbes Egea 34.0 34.0 34.0 Sabot C3 8476 LBYC Gunner Wehner 35.0 35.0 35.0 Sabot C3 LW1 Leeway Gabriel Ramirez 36.0 36.0 36.0 Sabot C3 116 37.0 37.0 37.0 Sabot C3 5703 LBYC Lukas Pando 38.0 38.0 38.0 Sabot C3 xxxx LBYC Claire McFarland 39.0 39.0 39.0 Class SailNo Club HelmName CrewName R1 Total Nett Sabot C3 3472 LBYC Charlie Thompson 40.0 40.0 40.0 Sabot C3 21 LBYC Tessa Thompson 41.0 41.0 41.0 Sabot C3 8669 LBYC Gavin Pando 42.0 42.0 42.0 Sabot C3 4632 LBYC Maddox Balladares 43.0 43.0 43.0 Sabot C3 13 SLBYC Owen Ralston 44.0 44.0 44.0 Sabot C3 LW2 Leeway Collin Ballow 45.0 45.0 45.0 Sabot C3 9293 LBYC Dante D'sa 46.0 46.0 46.0 Sabot C3 9703 LBYC Koa Dumont 47.0 47.0 47.0 Sabot C3 6986 LBYC Otto Wehner 48.0 48.0 48.0 Sabot C3 9959 SLBYC Braydon Johnson 49.0 49.0 49.0 Sabot C3 9950 SLBYC Rylee LeBlond 55.0 DNC 55.0 55.0 Sabot C3 7 LBYC Haley Pando 55.0 DNC 55.0 55.0 Sabot C3 LBYC Sienna Rose 55.0 DNC 55.0 55.0 Sabot C3 5665 LBYC Daniel maldonado 55.0 DNC 55.0 55.0 Sabot C3 8940 LBYC Charlotte Carty 55.0 DNC 55.0 55.0 Sailwave Scoring Software 2.19.8 www.sailwave.com .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Disability Classification System
    CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR STUDENTS WITH A DISABILITY Track & Field (NB: also used for Cross Country where applicable) Current Previous Definition Classification Classification Deaf (Track & Field Events) T/F 01 HI 55db loss on the average at 500, 1000 and 2000Hz in the better Equivalent to Au2 ear Visually Impaired T/F 11 B1 From no light perception at all in either eye, up to and including the ability to perceive light; inability to recognise objects or contours in any direction and at any distance. T/F 12 B2 Ability to recognise objects up to a distance of 2 metres ie below 2/60 and/or visual field of less than five (5) degrees. T/F13 B3 Can recognise contours between 2 and 6 metres away ie 2/60- 6/60 and visual field of more than five (5) degrees and less than twenty (20) degrees. Intellectually Disabled T/F 20 ID Intellectually disabled. The athlete’s intellectual functioning is 75 or below. Limitations in two or more of the following adaptive skill areas; communication, self-care; home living, social skills, community use, self direction, health and safety, functional academics, leisure and work. They must have acquired their condition before age 18. Cerebral Palsy C2 Upper Severe to moderate quadriplegia. Upper extremity events are Wheelchair performed by pushing the wheelchair with one or two arms and the wheelchair propulsion is restricted due to poor control. Upper extremity athletes have limited control of movements, but are able to produce some semblance of throwing motion. T/F 33 C3 Wheelchair Moderate quadriplegia. Fair functional strength and moderate problems in upper extremities and torso.
    [Show full text]
  • Marelli D6C & D5C ATEX Motor Technical Catalogue
    Motors for This catalogue refers to ATEX Motors belonging to Group I Category M2 and Group II Category 2G, 2D, 2GD as described. STANDARDS ® BEARINGS Hazardous Areas The ATEX Motors described in this catalogue are manufactured in accordance with IEC 60034-1-5-6-7-8-9-12-14, IEC 60072-1, EN 50347, EN 60079- D5, D6 SERIES Frame Size (mm) D - end N - end Frame Size Poles B 3 V 1 MarelliMotori 0-1-7, EN 61241-0-1. 71* 6202-2Z 6202-2Z D - end N - end D - end N - end I M2, II 2G, II 2D EUROPEAN DIRECTIVES 355-400 2 6217-C3 6217-C3 6217-C3 7217 B 80* 6204-2Z 6204-2Z Ex d/de I, Ex d/de IIB, Ex tD A21 IP65 Title Directive 90* 6205-2Z 6205-2Z 355 4 NU222-C3 6217-C3 NU222-C3 6217-C3 + 7217 B Equipment and protective system intended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres (ATEX) 94/9/EC 100* 6206-2Z 6206-2Z 400 4 NU222-C3 6222-C3 NU222-C3 6222-C3 + 7222 B Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) 2004/108/IEC 112* 6206-2Z 6206-2Z Low Voltage Directive (LVD) 2006/95/EC 132* 6308-2Z 6308-2Z HEADQUARTERS ITALIAN OFFICES Machinery Directive (MD) 98/37/EC 160 - 180M 6310-Z-C3 6209-Z-C3 Marelli Motori S.p.A. Milan CERTIFICATES 180L 6310-Z-C3 6210-Z-C3 Via Sabbionara, 1 Via Cesare Cantù, 29 200 6312-Z-C3 6210-Z-C3 Frame size Number Temperature Limits 36071 Arzignano (VI) Italy 20092 Cinisello Balsamo (MI) Italy 225 6313-Z-C3 6213-Z-C3 71-132 BVI 08 ATEX 0001 -20°C +40°C* 160-315 CESI 02 ATEX 071 -20 C +40 C* 250 6314-Z-C3 6213-Z-C3 (T) +39.0444.479711 (T) +39.02.660.131.66 ° ° These tables describe the bearing types used in standard configurations.
    [Show full text]
  • IGCC®/IGMA® CERTIFIED PRODUCTS February 2018 Page 15
    IGCC®/IGMA® CERTIFIED PRODUCTS CERTIFICATION FRAME INTERNAL LICENSEE NUMBER CONSTRUCTION SUBSTRATE SPACER DESICCANT SEALANT COMPONENTS GCIA Advantage Glass Corp 4457 BC4/PLLC U/C2 ZS LF PIB/S2 601 West Carboy Road Mount Prospect, IL 60056 847-290-1707 Advantage Glass Corp. IGCC(R)IGMA(R) 2017 AGC Flat Glass (Thailand) PLC. 4432 MC4/ALK U/C3/U MA/MA LF/LF PIB/S2 Yes 200 Moo 1, Suksawad Road Pak Khlong Bang Pla Kod Phra Samut Chedi, Samut Prakan 10290 Thailand 66-2815-5000x1982 AGC/Poma Glass Co. N.A. 2903 BC3/MC1/ZS/IC U/C3/U UT/UT DM/DM HM IC Yes 365 McClurg Road-Suite E 2904 BC3/MC1/ZS/IC U/C3/U US/US DM/DM HM IC Yes Boardman, OH 44512 3705 BC3/MC1/MT/IC U/C3/U FS/FS IB/IB HM IC Yes 330-965-1000 4173 BC3/MC1/IC U/C3 BCS IB BCS IC Yes AGC 61 IGCC®/IGMA® 2017 4268 BC3/MC1/ZS/IC U/C3/U US/US DM/DM RHM IC Yes 4277 BC3/MC1/ZS/IC U/C3/U UT/UT DM/DM RHM IC Yes 4584 BC3/MC1/IC U/C3 BPS IB BPS IC Yes 4654 BC3/MC1/MT/IC U/C3 FS/FS IB/IB HM IC Yes 4655 BC3/MC1/IC U/C3/U BCS/BCS IB/IB BCS IC Yes AGC-Poma Glass Co. N.A. 3981 BC3/MC1/MT/IC U/C3/U FS/FS IB/IB HM IC Yes 480 California Road 3982 BC3/MC1/ZS/IC U/C3/U US/US DM/DM HM IC Quakertown, PA 18951 4093 BC3/MC1/ZS/IC U/C3/U UT/UT DM/DM HM IC 215-538-9424 4094 BC3/MC1/ZS/IC U/C3/U UT/UT DM/DM HM IC Yes AGC 63 IGCC(R)/IGMA(R) 17 4099 BC3/MC1/IC U/C3 BPS IB BPS IC Yes 4236 BC3/MC1/IC U/C3/U BCS/BCS IB/IB BCS IC Yes 4648 BC3/MC1/ZS/IC U/C3/U US/US DM/DM HM IC Yes 4673 BC3/MC1/MT/IC U/C3/U FS/FS IB/IB HM IC Yes 4674 BC3/MC1/IC U/C3 BPS IB BPS IC Yes 4675 BC3/MC1/IC U/C3/U BCS/BCS IB/IB BCS IC Yes Ajiya Safety Glass Sdn Bhd 2871 MC4/PLK U/C2 MA LF PIB/S2 Lot 575, 1 KM Lebuhraya Segamat-Kuantan Segamat, Johor 85000 Malaysia 607-9313133 Ajiya® IGCC®/IGMA® ASTM E2190 2017 Al Abbar Architectural Glass 2977 BC4/ALLC U/U MA LF PIB/S2 Yes Sanaa St., PO Box 1626 Ras Alkhor, Industrial Estate Dubai United Arab Emirates 104-333-1362 Al Abbar IGCC®/IGMA® 2017 February 2018 Page 15 CERTIFICATION FRAME INTERNAL LICENSEE NUMBER CONSTRUCTION SUBSTRATE SPACER DESICCANT SEALANT COMPONENTS GCIA Aldora Aluminum and Glass Products Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Olympic Committee and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
    SELECTION STANDARDS United States Olympic Committee and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veteran Monthly Assistance Allowance Program The U.S. Olympic Committee supports Paralympic-eligible military veterans in their efforts to represent the USA at the Paralympic Games and other international sport competitions. Veterans who demonstrate exceptional sport skills and the commitment necessary to pursue elite-level competition are given guidance on securing the training, support, and coaching needed to qualify for Team USA and achieve their Paralympic dreams. Through a partnership between the United States Department of Veterans Affairs and the USOC, the VA National Veterans Sports Programs & Special Events Office provides a monthly assistance allowance for disabled Veterans of the Armed Forces training in a Paralympic sport, as authorized by 38 U.S.C. § 322(d) and section 703 of the Veterans’ Benefits Improvement Act of 2008. Through the program the VA will pay a monthly allowance to a Veteran with a service-connected or non-service-connected disability if the Veteran meets the minimum VA Monthly Assistance Allowance (VMAA) Standard in his/her respective sport and sport class at a recognized competition. Athletes must have established training and competition plans and are responsible for turning in monthly and/or quarterly forms and reports in order to continue receiving the monthly assistance allowance. Additionally, an athlete must be U.S. citizen OR permanent resident to be eligible. Lastly, in order to be eligible for the VMAA athletes must undergo either national or international classification evaluation (and be found Paralympic sport eligible) within six months of being placed on the allowance pay list.
    [Show full text]
  • Para Cycling Information Sheet About the Sport Classification Explained
    Para cycling information sheet About the sport Para cycling is cycling for people with impairments resulting from a health condition (disability). Para athletes with physical impairments either compete on handcycles, tricycles or bicycles, while those with a visual impairment compete on tandems with a sighted ‘pilot’. Para cycling is divided into track and road events, with seven events in total. Classification explained In Para sport classification provides the structure for fair and equitable competition to ensure that winning is determined by skill, fitness, power, endurance, tactical ability and mental focus – the same factors that account for success in sport for able-bodied athletes. The Para sport classification assessment process identifies the eligibility of each Para athlete’s impairment, and groups them into a sport class according to the degree of activity limitation resulting from their impairment. Classification is sport-specific as an eligible impairment affects a Para athlete’s ability to perform in different sports to a different extent. Each Para sport has a different classification system. Standard Classification in detail Para-Cycling sport classes include: Handcycle sport classes H1 – 5: There are five different sport classes for handcycle racing. The lower numbers indicate a more severe activity limitation. Para athletes competing in the H1 classes have a complete loss of trunk and leg function and limited arm function, e.g. as a result of a spinal cord injury. Para athletes in the H4 class have limited or no leg function, but good trunk and arm function. Para cyclists in sport classes H1 – 4 compete in a reclined position. Para cyclists in the H5 sport class sit on their knees because they are able to use their arms and trunk to accelerate the handcycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded As 2Ibz.Pdb [21] Protein from Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics (RCSB) Protein Data Bank (PDB)
    molecules Article Search for Novel Lead Inhibitors of Yeast Cytochrome bc1, from Drugbank and COCONUT Ozren Jovi´c* and Tomislav Šmuc Ruder¯ Boškovi´cInstitute, BijeniˇckaCesta 54, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +385-1-4561-085 Abstract: In this work we introduce a novel filtering and molecular modeling pipeline based on a fingerprint and descriptor similarity procedure, coupled with molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD), to select potential novel quoinone outside inhibitors (QoI) of cytochrome bc1 with the aim of determining the same or different chromophores to usual. The study was carried out using the yeast cytochrome bc1 complex with its docked ligand (stigmatellin), using all the fungicides from FRAC code C3 mode of action, 8617 Drugbank compounds and 401,624 COCONUT compounds. The introduced drug repurposing pipeline consists of compound similarity with C3 fungicides and molecular docking (MD) simulations with final QM/MM binding energy determination, while aiming for potential novel chromophores and perserving at least an amide (R1HN(C=O)R2) or ester functional group of almost all up to date C3 fungicides. 3D descriptors used for a similarity test were based on the 280 most stable Padel descriptors. Hit compounds that passed fingerprint and 3D descriptor similarity condition and had either an amide or an ester group were submitted to docking where they further had to satisfy both Chemscore fitness and specific conformation constraints. This rigorous selection resulted in a very limited number of candidates that were forwarded to MD simulations and QM/MM binding affinity estimations by the ORCA DFT program.
    [Show full text]
  • (VA) Veteran Monthly Assistance Allowance for Disabled Veterans
    Revised May 23, 2019 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Veteran Monthly Assistance Allowance for Disabled Veterans Training in Paralympic and Olympic Sports Program (VMAA) In partnership with the United States Olympic Committee and other Olympic and Paralympic entities within the United States, VA supports eligible service and non-service-connected military Veterans in their efforts to represent the USA at the Paralympic Games, Olympic Games and other international sport competitions. The VA Office of National Veterans Sports Programs & Special Events provides a monthly assistance allowance for disabled Veterans training in Paralympic sports, as well as certain disabled Veterans selected for or competing with the national Olympic Team, as authorized by 38 U.S.C. 322(d) and Section 703 of the Veterans’ Benefits Improvement Act of 2008. Through the program, VA will pay a monthly allowance to a Veteran with either a service-connected or non-service-connected disability if the Veteran meets the minimum military standards or higher (i.e. Emerging Athlete or National Team) in his or her respective Paralympic sport at a recognized competition. In addition to making the VMAA standard, an athlete must also be nationally or internationally classified by his or her respective Paralympic sport federation as eligible for Paralympic competition. VA will also pay a monthly allowance to a Veteran with a service-connected disability rated 30 percent or greater by VA who is selected for a national Olympic Team for any month in which the Veteran is competing in any event sanctioned by the National Governing Bodies of the Olympic Sport in the United State, in accordance with P.L.
    [Show full text]
  • LUCAS 2018 Technical Reference Document C3 Classification (Land
    Regional statistics and Geographic Information Author: E4.LUCAS (ESTAT) TechnicalDocuments 2018 LUCAS 2018 (Land Use / Cover Area Frame Survey) Technical reference document C3 Classification (Land cover & Land use) Regional statistics and Geographic Information Author: E4.LUCAS (ESTAT) TechnicalDocuments 2018 Table of Contents 1 Scope and Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 6 LUCAS survey classification comparison 2009 - 2012 ................................................................................... 7 LUCAS survey classification comparison 2012 - 2015 ................................................................................... 7 LUCAS survey classification comparison 2015 – 2018 ................................................................................... 9 Land cover and land use: general explications .............................................................................................. 9 Specific to the LUCAS classification ............................................................................................................. 10 The basic unit and the extended window of observation ........................................................................... 10 2 Land Cover Classification (LUCAS SU LC) ................................................................................................. 11 A00 ARTIFICIAL LAND .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • VISTA2013 Scientific Conference Booklet Gustav-Stresemann-Institut Bonn, 1-4 May 2013
    International Paralympic Committee VISTA2013 Scientific Conference Booklet Gustav-Stresemann-Institut Bonn, 1-4 May 2013 “Equipment & Technology in Paralympic Sports” “Equipment & Technology in Paralympic Sports” VISTA2013 Scientific Conference Gustav-Stresemann-Institut Bonn, 1-4 May 2013 The VISTA2013 Conference is organised by: International Paralympic Committee Adenauerallee 212-214 53113 Bonn, Germany Tel. +49 228 2097-200 Fax +49 228 2097-209 [email protected] www.paralympic.org © 2013 International Paralympic Committee I 2 I VISTA2013 Scientific Conference Table of Contents Forewords 4 VISTA2013 Scientific Committee 6 General Information 7 Venue 8 Programme at a Glance 10 Scientific Programme – Detail 12 Keynote Speakers 21 Symposia - Abstracts 26 Free Communications - Abstracts 32 Free Communications - Posters 78 Scientific Information 102 Scientific Award Winner 103 I 3 I VISTA2013 Scientific Conference Forewords Sir Philip Craven, MBE President, International Paralympic Committee Dear participants, On behalf of the International Paralympic Committee (IPC), I would like to welcome you to the 2013 VISTA Conference, the IPC’s scientific conference that will this year centre around the equipment and technology used in Paralympic sport. This conference brings together some of the world’s leading sport scientists, administrators, coaches and athletes. We hope you can take what you learn over the next few days back home with you to your respective communities to help further advance the Paralympic Movement. The next few days will include keynote addresses, symposia, oral presentations and poster sessions put together by the IPC Sports Science Committee that will motivate and influence you in your respective work environments, no matter which part of the Paralympic Movement you represent.
    [Show full text]
  • Should the Para-Cycling Classification System Be Reclassified?
    Should the para-cycling classification system be reclassified? David Borg1, John Osborne2, Johanna Liljedahl3, Michele Foster1, Carla Nooijen3 1The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia. 2School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. 3The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences (GIH), Stockholm, Sweden. Introduction Results Para-cycling athletes compete on bicycles (C1–5), handcycles The number of men in C1, C2, C3, C4 and C5 was 32, 76, 63, (H1–5) and tricycles (T1-2) in classes based on their functional 76, and 87, respectively. Nineteen men competed in T1 and 58 disability. Higher classes reflect less functional impairment. Para- in T2. The age range of men was 14–62 years. cycling classification is governed by the Union Cycliste Inter- The number of women competing in C1, C2, C3, C4 and C5 was nationale (UCI). The system aims to promote participation in the 4, 18, 16, 20 and 28, respectively. Eleven competed in T1 and sport, by controlling for the impact of impairment on the outcome 15 in T2. Women’s age ranged 17–55 years. of competition. Road race velocity for the bicycling and tricycling is shown in Recently, the separation between adjacent handcycling classes for Figure 1. Comparisons between adjacent classes for men and official UCI events was described––providing benchmarks for women are displayed in Table 2. active and potential athletes. Unfortunately, similar evaluation of the bicycling and tricycling disciplines has not been considered. With the expectation of C4 and C5 for women, the analysis showed that men's and women's road race performance was This study aimed to described the separation between adjacent statistically different between adjacent classes for bicycling and classes, based on performance, in UCI road race events for tricycling.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paralympic Athlete Dedicated to the Memory of Trevor Williams Who Inspired the Editors in 1997 to Write This Book
    This page intentionally left blank Handbook of Sports Medicine and Science The Paralympic Athlete Dedicated to the memory of Trevor Williams who inspired the editors in 1997 to write this book. Handbook of Sports Medicine and Science The Paralympic Athlete AN IOC MEDICAL COMMISSION PUBLICATION EDITED BY Yves C. Vanlandewijck PhD, PT Full professor at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences Department of Rehabilitation Sciences Leuven, Belgium Walter R. Thompson PhD Regents Professor Kinesiology and Health (College of Education) Nutrition (College of Health and Human Sciences) Georgia State University Atlanta, GA USA This edition fi rst published 2011 © 2011 International Olympic Committee Blackwell Publishing was acquired by John Wiley & Sons in February 2007. Blackwell’s publishing program has been merged with Wiley’s global Scientifi c, Technical and Medical business to form Wiley-Blackwell. Registered offi ce: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK Editorial offi ces: 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774, USA For details of our global editorial offi ces, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell The right of the author to be identifi ed as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Drive System Bearings Preferred Range – Selected for Application Specific Performance and Availability Drive System Bearings
    June 1, 2018 Drive system bearings Preferred range – selected for application specific performance and availability Drive system bearings SKF, as a leading global supplier, offers the Preferred range Summary broadest range of products, services and customer solutions to the railway industry. With worldwide presence, SKF is fully aware • Proven products for drive system SKF has developed a wide assortment of of customers’ needs and strives to meet the applications rolling bearings and services to meet the latest market demand, combining innovative • Based on field experience demanding needs for railway applications. technology, high quality and value in terms • Combination of customer needs and The railway industry never stands still of cost, performance and service. new technology and improvements and performance are A comprehensive assortment of drive • Good availability and adequate lead developed daily. Together with our custom- system bearings is a base for our preferred time ers, we are always aware of the latest trends product range for gearboxes and traction • The first choice for drive system in the market place and we are committed motors in railway applications. Proven prod- applications to staying completely up-to-date to make ucts in drive system applications, based on sure that the very latest developments are field experience, are included in the list of integrated into new products. preferred drive system bearings. Drive systems, such as gearboxes and In addition, common bearing suffixes are traction motors for railway trains, have to be listed in this brochure as well. powerful, environmentally friendly, cost- By fulfilling market demand for availability effective and require very low needs for and adequate lead time we strive to meet maintenance.
    [Show full text]