The Mosque Collection
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Disability Classification System
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR STUDENTS WITH A DISABILITY Track & Field (NB: also used for Cross Country where applicable) Current Previous Definition Classification Classification Deaf (Track & Field Events) T/F 01 HI 55db loss on the average at 500, 1000 and 2000Hz in the better Equivalent to Au2 ear Visually Impaired T/F 11 B1 From no light perception at all in either eye, up to and including the ability to perceive light; inability to recognise objects or contours in any direction and at any distance. T/F 12 B2 Ability to recognise objects up to a distance of 2 metres ie below 2/60 and/or visual field of less than five (5) degrees. T/F13 B3 Can recognise contours between 2 and 6 metres away ie 2/60- 6/60 and visual field of more than five (5) degrees and less than twenty (20) degrees. Intellectually Disabled T/F 20 ID Intellectually disabled. The athlete’s intellectual functioning is 75 or below. Limitations in two or more of the following adaptive skill areas; communication, self-care; home living, social skills, community use, self direction, health and safety, functional academics, leisure and work. They must have acquired their condition before age 18. Cerebral Palsy C2 Upper Severe to moderate quadriplegia. Upper extremity events are Wheelchair performed by pushing the wheelchair with one or two arms and the wheelchair propulsion is restricted due to poor control. Upper extremity athletes have limited control of movements, but are able to produce some semblance of throwing motion. T/F 33 C3 Wheelchair Moderate quadriplegia. Fair functional strength and moderate problems in upper extremities and torso. -
2018 Jessica Uniack Beach to Bay Race Long Beach Yacht Club
2018 Jessica Uniack Beach to Bay Race Long Beach Yacht Club Results for 2018 Jessica Uniack Beach to Bay Race CFJ Class Sailed: 1, Discards: 0, To count: 1, Entries: 25, Scoring system: Appendix A Class SailNo Club HelmName CrewName R1 Total Nett CFJ HHSF Jack Haliday Nicholas Ridout CFJ HHSF Trae Sanchez Ben Hagadorn CFJ LBYC 7 LBYC Nicky Lech Kai Bramble 1.0 1.0 1.0 CFJ 22 ABYC Nicholas Muller Ulises Lewis 2.0 2.0 2.0 CFJ LBYC 10 LBYC Preston Woodworth Alex Lech 3.0 3.0 3.0 CFJ 43 ABYC Summer Drake Paige Odell 4.0 4.0 4.0 CFJ 23 ABYC Nikhil Stewart Jamarcus Parker 5.0 5.0 5.0 CFJ 42 ABYC Sean colley Thomas Dobson 6.0 6.0 6.0 CFJ 44 ABYC Nicolas Sanchez Nicole Morikawa 7.0 7.0 7.0 CFJ 24 ?? 8.0 8.0 8.0 CFJ 0 HHSF Trae Sanchez Ben H 9.0 9.0 9.0 CFJ LBYC 2 LBYC Kyer Fox Isaure Chalandon 10.0 10.0 10.0 CFJ LBYC 9 LBYC Sawyer Bambam-Moak Katin Cathey 11.0 11.0 11.0 Class SailNo Club HelmName CrewName R1 Total Nett CFJ 46 ABYC Elisabeth Rossbach Troy Davidson 12.0 12.0 12.0 CFJ 00 HHSF Jack Haliday Nicholas 13.0 13.0 13.0 CFJ 41 ABYC Michael Colley Emilia Anctil 14.0 14.0 14.0 CFJ 6161 DPYC Riley Lenthall 15.0 15.0 15.0 CFJ 9PYSF HHYC Jack Busche Nolan Davis 16.0 16.0 16.0 CFJ 1510 DPYC Ryan Brown Colin Sekerka 17.0 17.0 17.0 CFJ 5151 DPYC Christopher Andersen Hunter Laws 18.0 18.0 18.0 CFJ LBYC 3 LBYC Luke Bramble Rio Dumont 19.0 19.0 19.0 CFJ LBYC 5 LBYC Jack Snow Reese Lapham 26.0 DSQ 26.0 26.0 CFJ 6161 DPYC Carsen Lenthall 26.0 DNC 26.0 26.0 CFJ 6161 DPYC Riley Lenthall 26.0 DNC 26.0 26.0 CFJ 5151 DPYC Hunter Laws Christopher Anderson -
Presenting the Paralympics: Affective Nationalism and the 'Able-Disabled'
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bournemouth University Research Online (Re-)presenting the Paralympics: Affective Nationalism and the 'able-disabled' Emma Pullen, Daniel Jackson and Michael Silk Communication & Sport (2019, in press) *To cite this article: Pullen, E., Jackson, D., and Silk, M. (2019). (Re-)presenting the Paralympics: Affective Nationalism and the 'able-disabled'. Communication & Sport Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract The relationship between media, sport, nations and nationalism is well established, yet, there is an absence of these discussions at the intersection of communication, Paralympics and disability studies. This omission is particularly significant considering the rapid commodification of the Paralympic spectacle, exacerbated by the entry of Channel 4 (C4) as the UK Paralympic rights holders, that has seen the games become an important site of disability (re-)presentation. In this article, we focus on the construction of national, normative, disabled bodies in Paralympic representation drawn from an analysis of three integrated datasets from Channel 4’s broadcasting of the Rio 2016 Paralympics: interviews with C4 production and editorial staff; quantitative content analysis, and qualitative moving image analysis. We highlight the strategic approach taken by C4 to focus on successful medal winning athletes; the implications this has on the sports and disability classifications given media coverage; and the role of affective high-value production practices. We also reveal the commercial tensions and editorial decisions that broadcasters face with respect to which disabilities / bodies are made hyper-visible - and thereby those which are marginalized - as national disability sport icons that inculcate preferred notions of disability and the (re)imagined nation. -
Marelli D6C & D5C ATEX Motor Technical Catalogue
Motors for This catalogue refers to ATEX Motors belonging to Group I Category M2 and Group II Category 2G, 2D, 2GD as described. STANDARDS ® BEARINGS Hazardous Areas The ATEX Motors described in this catalogue are manufactured in accordance with IEC 60034-1-5-6-7-8-9-12-14, IEC 60072-1, EN 50347, EN 60079- D5, D6 SERIES Frame Size (mm) D - end N - end Frame Size Poles B 3 V 1 MarelliMotori 0-1-7, EN 61241-0-1. 71* 6202-2Z 6202-2Z D - end N - end D - end N - end I M2, II 2G, II 2D EUROPEAN DIRECTIVES 355-400 2 6217-C3 6217-C3 6217-C3 7217 B 80* 6204-2Z 6204-2Z Ex d/de I, Ex d/de IIB, Ex tD A21 IP65 Title Directive 90* 6205-2Z 6205-2Z 355 4 NU222-C3 6217-C3 NU222-C3 6217-C3 + 7217 B Equipment and protective system intended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres (ATEX) 94/9/EC 100* 6206-2Z 6206-2Z 400 4 NU222-C3 6222-C3 NU222-C3 6222-C3 + 7222 B Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) 2004/108/IEC 112* 6206-2Z 6206-2Z Low Voltage Directive (LVD) 2006/95/EC 132* 6308-2Z 6308-2Z HEADQUARTERS ITALIAN OFFICES Machinery Directive (MD) 98/37/EC 160 - 180M 6310-Z-C3 6209-Z-C3 Marelli Motori S.p.A. Milan CERTIFICATES 180L 6310-Z-C3 6210-Z-C3 Via Sabbionara, 1 Via Cesare Cantù, 29 200 6312-Z-C3 6210-Z-C3 Frame size Number Temperature Limits 36071 Arzignano (VI) Italy 20092 Cinisello Balsamo (MI) Italy 225 6313-Z-C3 6213-Z-C3 71-132 BVI 08 ATEX 0001 -20°C +40°C* 160-315 CESI 02 ATEX 071 -20 C +40 C* 250 6314-Z-C3 6213-Z-C3 (T) +39.0444.479711 (T) +39.02.660.131.66 ° ° These tables describe the bearing types used in standard configurations. -
The Impact of Lower-Limb Prosthetic Limb Use in International C4 Track Para-Cycling
The impact of lower-limb prosthetic limb use in international C4 track para-cycling An investigation was undertaken to ascertain any impact or significance of athletes within the C4 paracycling classification between those who use a lower- limb prostheses and those who do not. A statistical evaluation of event completion time was undertaken to assess C4 cyclists when competing at the World Championships and the Paralympic Games in the 1km track time trial. The C4 athletes who utilise a prostheses consistently outperformed non-amputees in the C4 classification from 2011-2016 on a competition-to-competition basis. However, when the participations were grouped as a whole together and an identified outlier athlete was removed, it was then demonstrated that there was no statistical significance between those who required the use of a lower-limb prostheses to those that did not when either evaluated on a competition-by- competition or on an amputee and non-amputee group-by-group basis (P=>0.05). As a result, this study proposes that those requiring the use of lower-limb prostheses are neither advantaged nor disadvantaged in the C4 classification category when competing in the 1km time trial at this time. Implications for Rehabilitation • This analysis indicates that at this time, there is no evidence to suggest that use of such technology is advantageous in this category or should be seen as controversial. • The design of lower-limb prosthetic limb technology in cycling should continue to be developed and optimized unabated. • This study begins to address the cited lack of peer reviewed information regarding paracycling with limb absence available to practitioners. -
IGCC®/IGMA® CERTIFIED PRODUCTS February 2018 Page 15
IGCC®/IGMA® CERTIFIED PRODUCTS CERTIFICATION FRAME INTERNAL LICENSEE NUMBER CONSTRUCTION SUBSTRATE SPACER DESICCANT SEALANT COMPONENTS GCIA Advantage Glass Corp 4457 BC4/PLLC U/C2 ZS LF PIB/S2 601 West Carboy Road Mount Prospect, IL 60056 847-290-1707 Advantage Glass Corp. IGCC(R)IGMA(R) 2017 AGC Flat Glass (Thailand) PLC. 4432 MC4/ALK U/C3/U MA/MA LF/LF PIB/S2 Yes 200 Moo 1, Suksawad Road Pak Khlong Bang Pla Kod Phra Samut Chedi, Samut Prakan 10290 Thailand 66-2815-5000x1982 AGC/Poma Glass Co. N.A. 2903 BC3/MC1/ZS/IC U/C3/U UT/UT DM/DM HM IC Yes 365 McClurg Road-Suite E 2904 BC3/MC1/ZS/IC U/C3/U US/US DM/DM HM IC Yes Boardman, OH 44512 3705 BC3/MC1/MT/IC U/C3/U FS/FS IB/IB HM IC Yes 330-965-1000 4173 BC3/MC1/IC U/C3 BCS IB BCS IC Yes AGC 61 IGCC®/IGMA® 2017 4268 BC3/MC1/ZS/IC U/C3/U US/US DM/DM RHM IC Yes 4277 BC3/MC1/ZS/IC U/C3/U UT/UT DM/DM RHM IC Yes 4584 BC3/MC1/IC U/C3 BPS IB BPS IC Yes 4654 BC3/MC1/MT/IC U/C3 FS/FS IB/IB HM IC Yes 4655 BC3/MC1/IC U/C3/U BCS/BCS IB/IB BCS IC Yes AGC-Poma Glass Co. N.A. 3981 BC3/MC1/MT/IC U/C3/U FS/FS IB/IB HM IC Yes 480 California Road 3982 BC3/MC1/ZS/IC U/C3/U US/US DM/DM HM IC Quakertown, PA 18951 4093 BC3/MC1/ZS/IC U/C3/U UT/UT DM/DM HM IC 215-538-9424 4094 BC3/MC1/ZS/IC U/C3/U UT/UT DM/DM HM IC Yes AGC 63 IGCC(R)/IGMA(R) 17 4099 BC3/MC1/IC U/C3 BPS IB BPS IC Yes 4236 BC3/MC1/IC U/C3/U BCS/BCS IB/IB BCS IC Yes 4648 BC3/MC1/ZS/IC U/C3/U US/US DM/DM HM IC Yes 4673 BC3/MC1/MT/IC U/C3/U FS/FS IB/IB HM IC Yes 4674 BC3/MC1/IC U/C3 BPS IB BPS IC Yes 4675 BC3/MC1/IC U/C3/U BCS/BCS IB/IB BCS IC Yes Ajiya Safety Glass Sdn Bhd 2871 MC4/PLK U/C2 MA LF PIB/S2 Lot 575, 1 KM Lebuhraya Segamat-Kuantan Segamat, Johor 85000 Malaysia 607-9313133 Ajiya® IGCC®/IGMA® ASTM E2190 2017 Al Abbar Architectural Glass 2977 BC4/ALLC U/U MA LF PIB/S2 Yes Sanaa St., PO Box 1626 Ras Alkhor, Industrial Estate Dubai United Arab Emirates 104-333-1362 Al Abbar IGCC®/IGMA® 2017 February 2018 Page 15 CERTIFICATION FRAME INTERNAL LICENSEE NUMBER CONSTRUCTION SUBSTRATE SPACER DESICCANT SEALANT COMPONENTS GCIA Aldora Aluminum and Glass Products Inc. -
United States Olympic Committee and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
SELECTION STANDARDS United States Olympic Committee and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veteran Monthly Assistance Allowance Program The U.S. Olympic Committee supports Paralympic-eligible military veterans in their efforts to represent the USA at the Paralympic Games and other international sport competitions. Veterans who demonstrate exceptional sport skills and the commitment necessary to pursue elite-level competition are given guidance on securing the training, support, and coaching needed to qualify for Team USA and achieve their Paralympic dreams. Through a partnership between the United States Department of Veterans Affairs and the USOC, the VA National Veterans Sports Programs & Special Events Office provides a monthly assistance allowance for disabled Veterans of the Armed Forces training in a Paralympic sport, as authorized by 38 U.S.C. § 322(d) and section 703 of the Veterans’ Benefits Improvement Act of 2008. Through the program the VA will pay a monthly allowance to a Veteran with a service-connected or non-service-connected disability if the Veteran meets the minimum VA Monthly Assistance Allowance (VMAA) Standard in his/her respective sport and sport class at a recognized competition. Athletes must have established training and competition plans and are responsible for turning in monthly and/or quarterly forms and reports in order to continue receiving the monthly assistance allowance. Additionally, an athlete must be U.S. citizen OR permanent resident to be eligible. Lastly, in order to be eligible for the VMAA athletes must undergo either national or international classification evaluation (and be found Paralympic sport eligible) within six months of being placed on the allowance pay list. -
Para Cycling Information Sheet About the Sport Classification Explained
Para cycling information sheet About the sport Para cycling is cycling for people with impairments resulting from a health condition (disability). Para athletes with physical impairments either compete on handcycles, tricycles or bicycles, while those with a visual impairment compete on tandems with a sighted ‘pilot’. Para cycling is divided into track and road events, with seven events in total. Classification explained In Para sport classification provides the structure for fair and equitable competition to ensure that winning is determined by skill, fitness, power, endurance, tactical ability and mental focus – the same factors that account for success in sport for able-bodied athletes. The Para sport classification assessment process identifies the eligibility of each Para athlete’s impairment, and groups them into a sport class according to the degree of activity limitation resulting from their impairment. Classification is sport-specific as an eligible impairment affects a Para athlete’s ability to perform in different sports to a different extent. Each Para sport has a different classification system. Standard Classification in detail Para-Cycling sport classes include: Handcycle sport classes H1 – 5: There are five different sport classes for handcycle racing. The lower numbers indicate a more severe activity limitation. Para athletes competing in the H1 classes have a complete loss of trunk and leg function and limited arm function, e.g. as a result of a spinal cord injury. Para athletes in the H4 class have limited or no leg function, but good trunk and arm function. Para cyclists in sport classes H1 – 4 compete in a reclined position. Para cyclists in the H5 sport class sit on their knees because they are able to use their arms and trunk to accelerate the handcycle. -
Downloaded As 2Ibz.Pdb [21] Protein from Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics (RCSB) Protein Data Bank (PDB)
molecules Article Search for Novel Lead Inhibitors of Yeast Cytochrome bc1, from Drugbank and COCONUT Ozren Jovi´c* and Tomislav Šmuc Ruder¯ Boškovi´cInstitute, BijeniˇckaCesta 54, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +385-1-4561-085 Abstract: In this work we introduce a novel filtering and molecular modeling pipeline based on a fingerprint and descriptor similarity procedure, coupled with molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD), to select potential novel quoinone outside inhibitors (QoI) of cytochrome bc1 with the aim of determining the same or different chromophores to usual. The study was carried out using the yeast cytochrome bc1 complex with its docked ligand (stigmatellin), using all the fungicides from FRAC code C3 mode of action, 8617 Drugbank compounds and 401,624 COCONUT compounds. The introduced drug repurposing pipeline consists of compound similarity with C3 fungicides and molecular docking (MD) simulations with final QM/MM binding energy determination, while aiming for potential novel chromophores and perserving at least an amide (R1HN(C=O)R2) or ester functional group of almost all up to date C3 fungicides. 3D descriptors used for a similarity test were based on the 280 most stable Padel descriptors. Hit compounds that passed fingerprint and 3D descriptor similarity condition and had either an amide or an ester group were submitted to docking where they further had to satisfy both Chemscore fitness and specific conformation constraints. This rigorous selection resulted in a very limited number of candidates that were forwarded to MD simulations and QM/MM binding affinity estimations by the ORCA DFT program. -
(VA) Veteran Monthly Assistance Allowance for Disabled Veterans
Revised May 23, 2019 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Veteran Monthly Assistance Allowance for Disabled Veterans Training in Paralympic and Olympic Sports Program (VMAA) In partnership with the United States Olympic Committee and other Olympic and Paralympic entities within the United States, VA supports eligible service and non-service-connected military Veterans in their efforts to represent the USA at the Paralympic Games, Olympic Games and other international sport competitions. The VA Office of National Veterans Sports Programs & Special Events provides a monthly assistance allowance for disabled Veterans training in Paralympic sports, as well as certain disabled Veterans selected for or competing with the national Olympic Team, as authorized by 38 U.S.C. 322(d) and Section 703 of the Veterans’ Benefits Improvement Act of 2008. Through the program, VA will pay a monthly allowance to a Veteran with either a service-connected or non-service-connected disability if the Veteran meets the minimum military standards or higher (i.e. Emerging Athlete or National Team) in his or her respective Paralympic sport at a recognized competition. In addition to making the VMAA standard, an athlete must also be nationally or internationally classified by his or her respective Paralympic sport federation as eligible for Paralympic competition. VA will also pay a monthly allowance to a Veteran with a service-connected disability rated 30 percent or greater by VA who is selected for a national Olympic Team for any month in which the Veteran is competing in any event sanctioned by the National Governing Bodies of the Olympic Sport in the United State, in accordance with P.L. -
SP PP P Stainless Steel C Channels
PPPSSP Stainless Steel C Channels Penn Stainless Products supplies stainless channels in 304/304L and 316/316L. Larger channels in excess of 24” can be manufactured utilizing laser fusion technology. Laser fused technology also en ables engineers and metal buyers to mix thickness or even material grades. Laser fused channels C C caCn also be supplied in Duplex 2205 and lean Duplex 2101. All channels can be cut to size. Stainless channels can be supA plied with a Apolished finish. Contact a sales associate for details regarding A stain less sCteel channels. C C B B B Stainless Steel C Channels F F 20-22 Ft. R/FL Tf Tf Tf Specs: QQS-ASTM-ASME-AMS D D In graDdes 304, 304L, 316, 316L Annealed and Pickled Tw Tw Tw Tapered Non-Tapered DimensiFons F D F Tw B Tf Est Wt* Production Technology Tf Tf C Value- Bar Channels A BDC3/4 x 3/8 x 1/8 D 3/4 3/8 1/8 1/8 0.56 hot rolled Added BC1 x 3/8 x 1/8 1 3/8 1/8 1/8 0.68 hot rolled A BC1 x 1/2 x 1/8 1 1/2 1/8 C 1/8 0.84 hot rolled Services BC1-1/8 xTw 9/16 x 1/8 1Tw-1/8 9/16 1/8 1/8 1.16 hot rolled BC1-1/4 x 1/2 x 1/8 1-1/4 1/2 1/8 B 1/8 1.01 hot rolled 1 piece or 500 pieces, BC1-1/2 x 1/2 x 1/8 1-1/2 1/2 1/8 3/16 1.12 hot rolled Channels can be cut to A A BC1-1/2 x 9/16 x 3/16 1-1/2 9/16 3/16 1/8 1.44 hot rolled your exact requirements. -
LUCAS 2018 Technical Reference Document C3 Classification (Land
Regional statistics and Geographic Information Author: E4.LUCAS (ESTAT) TechnicalDocuments 2018 LUCAS 2018 (Land Use / Cover Area Frame Survey) Technical reference document C3 Classification (Land cover & Land use) Regional statistics and Geographic Information Author: E4.LUCAS (ESTAT) TechnicalDocuments 2018 Table of Contents 1 Scope and Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 6 LUCAS survey classification comparison 2009 - 2012 ................................................................................... 7 LUCAS survey classification comparison 2012 - 2015 ................................................................................... 7 LUCAS survey classification comparison 2015 – 2018 ................................................................................... 9 Land cover and land use: general explications .............................................................................................. 9 Specific to the LUCAS classification ............................................................................................................. 10 The basic unit and the extended window of observation ........................................................................... 10 2 Land Cover Classification (LUCAS SU LC) ................................................................................................. 11 A00 ARTIFICIAL LAND .............................................................................................................................