DOCSLIB.ORG

LUCAS 2018 Technical Reference Document C3 Classification (Land

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Regional statistics and Geographic Information Author: E4.LUCAS (ESTAT) TechnicalDocuments 2018 LUCAS 2018 (Land Use / Cover Area Frame Survey) Technical reference document C3 Classification (Land cover & Land use) Regional statistics and Geographic Information Author: E4.LUCAS (ESTAT) TechnicalDocuments 2018 Table of Contents 1 Scope and Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 6 LUCAS survey classification comparison 2009 - 2012 ................................................................................... 7 LUCAS survey classification comparison 2012 - 2015 ................................................................................... 7 LUCAS survey classification comparison 2015 – 2018 ................................................................................... 9 Land cover and land use: general explications .............................................................................................. 9 Specific to the LUCAS classification ............................................................................................................. 10 The basic unit and the extended window of observation ........................................................................... 10 2 Land Cover Classification (LUCAS SU LC) ................................................................................................. 11 A00 ARTIFICIAL LAND .............................................................................................................................. 11 A10 ROOFED BUILT-UP AREAS ........................................................................................................... 11 A20 ARTIFICIAL NON-BUILT UP AREAS ............................................................................................... 13 A30 OTHER ARTIFICIAL AREAS ............................................................................................................ 14 B00 CROPLAND ........................................................................................................................................ 15 B10 CEREALS ...................................................................................................................................... 15 B20 ROOT CROPS ............................................................................................................................... 18 B30 NON-PERMANENT INDUSTRIAL CROPS ...................................................................................... 20 B40 DRY PULSES, VEGETABLES AND FLOWERS .................................................................................. 24 B50 FODDER CROPS ........................................................................................................................... 27 B70 PERMANENT CROPS: FRUIT TREES .............................................................................................. 30 B80 OTHER PERMANENT CROPS ........................................................................................................ 34 C00 WOODLAND ..................................................................................................................................... 37 C10 BROADLEAVED WOODLAND ....................................................................................................... 37 C20 CONIFEROUS WOODLAND .......................................................................................................... 39 C30 MIXED WOODLAND .................................................................................................................... 41 FOREST TYPES (LUCAS SU FT) .................................................................................................................. 43 Eurostat - LUCAS 2018 Technical document C3 - Classification D00 SHRUBLAND ..................................................................................................................................... 55 D10 SHRUBLAND WITH SPARSE TREE COVER .................................................................................... 55 D20 SHRUBLAND WITHOUT TREE COVER .......................................................................................... 56 E00 GRASSLAND ...................................................................................................................................... 57 E10 GRASSLAND WITH SPARSE TREE/SHRUB COVER ........................................................................ 57 E20 GRASSLAND WITHOUT TREE/SHRUB COVER .............................................................................. 57 E30 SPONTANEOUSLY RE-VEGETATED SURFACES ............................................................................. 58 F00 BARE LAND AND LICHENS/MOSS ..................................................................................................... 60 F10 ROCKS AND STONES .................................................................................................................... 60 F20 SAND ........................................................................................................................................... 60 F30 LICHENS AND MOSS .................................................................................................................... 60 F40 OTHER BARE SOIL ........................................................................................................................ 61 G00 WATER AREAS .................................................................................................................................. 63 G10 INLAND WATER BODIES .............................................................................................................. 63 G20 INLAND RUNNING WATER .......................................................................................................... 64 G30 TRANSITIONAL WATER BODIES ................................................................................................... 65 G40 SEA AND OCEAN .......................................................................................................................... 65 G50 GLACIERS, PERMANENT SNOW ................................................................................................... 66 H00 WETLANDS ....................................................................................................................................... 67 H10 INLAND WETLANDS ..................................................................................................................... 67 H20 COASTAL WETLANDS .................................................................................................................. 68 3 Land Use Classification (LUCAS SU LU) .................................................................................................... 70 U100 Primary sector .................................................................................................................................. 70 U110 AGRICULTURE.............................................................................................................................. 70 U120 FORESTRY .................................................................................................................................... 73 U130 AQUACULTURE AND FISHING ..................................................................................................... 73 U140 MINING AND QUARRYING .......................................................................................................... 75 U150 OTHER PRIMARY PRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 75 U200 Secondary sector .............................................................................................................................. 76 U210 ENERGY PRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 76 U220 INDUSTRY AND MANUFACTURING ............................................................................................. 76 LUCAS2018_C3-Classification_20190214_web_v2.doc 3/98 U300 Tertiary sector, transport, utilities & residential ............................................................................. 81 U310 TRANSPORT, COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, STORAGE, PROTECTION WORKS ........................ 81 U320 WATER AND WASTE TREATMENT ............................................................................................... 83 U330 CONSTRUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 84 U340 COMMERCE, FINANCIAL, PROFESSIONAL AND INFORMATION SERVICES .................................. 84 U350 COMMUNITY SERVICES ............................................................................................................... 85 U360 RECREATION, LEISURE, SPORT .................................................................................................... 86 U370 RESIDENTIAL ................................................................................................................................ 86 U400 Unused and abandoned areas ......................................................................................................... 87 U410 Abandoned areas ........................................................................................................................ 87 U420 Semi-natural and natural
Recommended publications
  • Disability Classification System

    Disability Classification System

    CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR STUDENTS WITH A DISABILITY Track & Field (NB: also used for Cross Country where applicable) Current Previous Definition Classification Classification Deaf (Track & Field Events) T/F 01 HI 55db loss on the average at 500, 1000 and 2000Hz in the better Equivalent to Au2 ear Visually Impaired T/F 11 B1 From no light perception at all in either eye, up to and including the ability to perceive light; inability to recognise objects or contours in any direction and at any distance. T/F 12 B2 Ability to recognise objects up to a distance of 2 metres ie below 2/60 and/or visual field of less than five (5) degrees. T/F13 B3 Can recognise contours between 2 and 6 metres away ie 2/60- 6/60 and visual field of more than five (5) degrees and less than twenty (20) degrees. Intellectually Disabled T/F 20 ID Intellectually disabled. The athlete’s intellectual functioning is 75 or below. Limitations in two or more of the following adaptive skill areas; communication, self-care; home living, social skills, community use, self direction, health and safety, functional academics, leisure and work. They must have acquired their condition before age 18. Cerebral Palsy C2 Upper Severe to moderate quadriplegia. Upper extremity events are Wheelchair performed by pushing the wheelchair with one or two arms and the wheelchair propulsion is restricted due to poor control. Upper extremity athletes have limited control of movements, but are able to produce some semblance of throwing motion. T/F 33 C3 Wheelchair Moderate quadriplegia. Fair functional strength and moderate problems in upper extremities and torso.
  • Sicilian Eatery

    Sicilian Eatery

    SICILIAN EATERY Concrete is a casual dining experience located on the border of Brooklyn neighborhoods Bedford Stuyvesant + Bushwick. 917-886-9660 The 3,000 sq ft space has a capacity of 75, featuring an open kitchen, dining area, full bar with seating, and performance stage. 906 Broadway, Concrete’s menu includes a variety of plates from both Italian and American cuisines, Brooklyn NY 11206 in addition to a selection of Sicilian street food favorites. 906broadway The bar offers a selection of top shelf liquors, Sicilian wines, and local beers. @gmail.com The list of specialty cocktails are curated exclusively for Concrete, with all cocktail syrups made fresh + in house by our bartending staff. @concretebrooklyn Open June 2018, the space features artwork from both local and international artists, www. including a custom mural from artist Mike Lee on the building’s Stockton St side. concrete-brooklyn The live event calendar is set to premiere in Fall 2018. .com Currently serving dinner from 5p - 11p, with brunch available on weekends. Located at 906 Broadway, Brooklyn NY 11206, accessible by the J/M/Z trains at Myrtle-Broadway + the B46 bus. THE NEAREST TRAINS ARE THE M/J/Z LINES AT MYRTLE - BROADWAY, OR FLUSHING AVE. WE ARE A 14 MINUTE WALK FROM THE HALSEY L TRAIN STATION IN BUSHWICK. THE B46, B47, B54, M1, M119 (AT MYRTLE AVE), AND B15 (AT LEWIS AVE) HAVE ROUTES TO MYRTLE / BROADWAY JUNCTION, AND ARE WITHIN A 3-10 MINUTE WALK FROM CONCRETE’S LOCATION. High resolution images can be downloaded here: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/1upry4klu8zc8ll/AADVl9DsBLjDfT5-E4H1iezNa?dl=0 Interior and Exterior Space Photography: Leonardo Mascaro http://www.leonardomascaro.com Food + Drink Photography: Paul Quitoriano http://www.paulcrispin.com DOP GRADE PRODUCTS Dnominazione di Origine Protetta certification ensures that products are locally grown and packaged.
  • 2018 Jessica Uniack Beach to Bay Race Long Beach Yacht Club

    2018 Jessica Uniack Beach to Bay Race Long Beach Yacht Club

    2018 Jessica Uniack Beach to Bay Race Long Beach Yacht Club Results for 2018 Jessica Uniack Beach to Bay Race CFJ Class Sailed: 1, Discards: 0, To count: 1, Entries: 25, Scoring system: Appendix A Class SailNo Club HelmName CrewName R1 Total Nett CFJ HHSF Jack Haliday Nicholas Ridout CFJ HHSF Trae Sanchez Ben Hagadorn CFJ LBYC 7 LBYC Nicky Lech Kai Bramble 1.0 1.0 1.0 CFJ 22 ABYC Nicholas Muller Ulises Lewis 2.0 2.0 2.0 CFJ LBYC 10 LBYC Preston Woodworth Alex Lech 3.0 3.0 3.0 CFJ 43 ABYC Summer Drake Paige Odell 4.0 4.0 4.0 CFJ 23 ABYC Nikhil Stewart Jamarcus Parker 5.0 5.0 5.0 CFJ 42 ABYC Sean colley Thomas Dobson 6.0 6.0 6.0 CFJ 44 ABYC Nicolas Sanchez Nicole Morikawa 7.0 7.0 7.0 CFJ 24 ?? 8.0 8.0 8.0 CFJ 0 HHSF Trae Sanchez Ben H 9.0 9.0 9.0 CFJ LBYC 2 LBYC Kyer Fox Isaure Chalandon 10.0 10.0 10.0 CFJ LBYC 9 LBYC Sawyer Bambam-Moak Katin Cathey 11.0 11.0 11.0 Class SailNo Club HelmName CrewName R1 Total Nett CFJ 46 ABYC Elisabeth Rossbach Troy Davidson 12.0 12.0 12.0 CFJ 00 HHSF Jack Haliday Nicholas 13.0 13.0 13.0 CFJ 41 ABYC Michael Colley Emilia Anctil 14.0 14.0 14.0 CFJ 6161 DPYC Riley Lenthall 15.0 15.0 15.0 CFJ 9PYSF HHYC Jack Busche Nolan Davis 16.0 16.0 16.0 CFJ 1510 DPYC Ryan Brown Colin Sekerka 17.0 17.0 17.0 CFJ 5151 DPYC Christopher Andersen Hunter Laws 18.0 18.0 18.0 CFJ LBYC 3 LBYC Luke Bramble Rio Dumont 19.0 19.0 19.0 CFJ LBYC 5 LBYC Jack Snow Reese Lapham 26.0 DSQ 26.0 26.0 CFJ 6161 DPYC Carsen Lenthall 26.0 DNC 26.0 26.0 CFJ 6161 DPYC Riley Lenthall 26.0 DNC 26.0 26.0 CFJ 5151 DPYC Hunter Laws Christopher Anderson
  • What Is a Tree in the Mediterranean Basin Hotspot? a Critical Analysis

    What Is a Tree in the Mediterranean Basin Hotspot? a Critical Analysis

    Médail et al. Forest Ecosystems (2019) 6:17 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-019-0170-6 RESEARCH Open Access What is a tree in the Mediterranean Basin hotspot? A critical analysis Frédéric Médail1* , Anne-Christine Monnet1, Daniel Pavon1, Toni Nikolic2, Panayotis Dimopoulos3, Gianluigi Bacchetta4, Juan Arroyo5, Zoltán Barina6, Marwan Cheikh Albassatneh7, Gianniantonio Domina8, Bruno Fady9, Vlado Matevski10, Stephen Mifsud11 and Agathe Leriche1 Abstract Background: Tree species represent 20% of the vascular plant species worldwide and they play a crucial role in the global functioning of the biosphere. The Mediterranean Basin is one of the 36 world biodiversity hotspots, and it is estimated that forests covered 82% of the landscape before the first human impacts, thousands of years ago. However, the spatial distribution of the Mediterranean biodiversity is still imperfectly known, and a focus on tree species constitutes a key issue for understanding forest functioning and develop conservation strategies. Methods: We provide the first comprehensive checklist of all native tree taxa (species and subspecies) present in the Mediterranean-European region (from Portugal to Cyprus). We identified some cases of woody species difficult to categorize as trees that we further called “cryptic trees”. We collected the occurrences of tree taxa by “administrative regions”, i.e. country or large island, and by biogeographical provinces. We studied the species-area relationship, and evaluated the conservation issues for threatened taxa following IUCN criteria. Results: We identified 245 tree taxa that included 210 species and 35 subspecies, belonging to 33 families and 64 genera. It included 46 endemic tree taxa (30 species and 16 subspecies), mainly distributed within a single biogeographical unit.
  • MTA B54 Bus Timetable

    MTA B54 Bus Timetable

    Bus Timetable B54 New York City Transit Downtown Brooklyn - Ridgewood via Myrtle Av Local Service For accessible subway stations, travel directions and other information: Effective April 4, 2021 Visit www.mta.info or call us at 511 We are introducing a new style to our timetables. These read better on mobile devices and print better on home printers. This is a work in progress — the design will evolve over the coming months. Soon, we'll also have an online timetable viewer with more ways to view timetables. Let us know your thoughts, questions, or suggestions about the new timetables at new.mta.info/timetables-feedback. B54 Weekday To Ridgewood Dwntwn Bklyn Fort Greene Fort Greene Bushwick Ridgewood Jay St / Myrtle Plz Myrtle Av / Vanderbilt Av Myrtle Av / Nostrand Av Myrtle Av / Broadway Palmetto St / St Nicholas Av 1:07 1:15 1:20 1:25 1:31 2:12 2:20 2:25 2:30 2:36 3:17 3:25 3:30 3:35 3:41 4:22 4:30 4:35 4:40 4:46 4:56 5:04 5:10 5:18 5:26 5:26 5:35 5:41 5:49 5:57 5:56 6:05 6:14 6:22 6:30 6:25 6:36 6:45 6:56 7:08 6:45 6:56 7:05 7:16 7:28 7:00 7:11 7:20 7:31 7:43 7:15 7:26 7:35 7:46 7:58 7:27 7:38 7:47 7:58 8:10 7:37 7:48 7:57 8:08 8:20 7:47 7:58 8:07 8:18 8:30 7:57 8:08 8:17 8:28 8:40 8:07 8:18 8:27 8:38 8:50 8:17 8:28 8:37 8:48 9:00 8:25 8:36 8:45 8:56 9:08 8:33 8:44 8:53 9:04 9:16 8:41 8:52 9:01 9:12 9:24 8:49 9:00 9:09 9:20 9:32 8:57 9:08 9:17 9:28 9:40 9:05 9:16 9:25 9:36 9:48 9:13 9:24 9:33 9:44 9:56 9:21 9:32 9:41 9:52 10:04 9:30 9:41 9:50 10:01 10:13 9:40 9:51 10:00 10:11 10:23 9:50 10:01 10:10 10:21 10:33 10:00 10:11 10:20 10:31 10:43 10:10 10:21 10:30 10:41 10:53 10:20 10:31 10:43 10:54 11:06 10:30 10:43 10:55 11:06 11:18 10:45 10:58 11:10 11:21 11:33 Bold times denote PM hours.
  • S P R I N G 20 18

    S P R I N G 20 18

    S P R I N G 2018 URBAN REVIEW LETTER FROM THE EDITORS A magazine of the Hunter College Planning is inherently political; this is something that Hunter students know well. The Introduction Department of to Planning course has many students reading entire books on problem solving and policy analysis, Urban Affairs & Planning as we aspire to not simply write plans from afar but to affect change, using our skills as planners to SPRING ‘18 advocate within the imperfect and at times broken realm of politics. STAFF However, politics is not simply a tool to accomplish goals of planning. Planning itself is a powerful Editors in Chief political tool, one that can be used to accomplish and demonstrate political goals. A zoning change, a Aly Hassell parking limit, or a design for a park are not technical planning decisions but are pronouncements of Atara Lindenbaum priorities, of political goals, and of particular visions of space and community. Our responsibility as future planners is to probe this technical side of planning, determining its larger context. Layout and Design Editor Aly Hassell This issue of Urban Review had the privilege to feature two accomplished and active planners: Com- missioner Mitchell Silver of the NYC Parks Department and Dr. Lester King, Sustainability Planner Writers James Hull in Houston, TX. Both Silver and King emphasize the need for proper community engagement and Beatriz Gil dialogue. Vicky Garvey Ranjana Venkatesh It is time to ask, however, if this focus on process, on stakeholder engagement and communication Atara Lindenbaum suffices. Equitable planning processes may be inherently positive improvements, but our cities, our Andy Lawson Michael Kralovich people, need equitable results as well.
  • Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress

    Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress

    Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress Updated May 22, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R41153 Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The diminishment of Arctic sea ice has led to increased human activities in the Arctic, and has heightened interest in, and concerns about, the region’s future. The United States, by virtue of Alaska, is an Arctic country and has substantial interests in the region. The seven other Arctic states are Canada, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark (by virtue of Greenland), and Russia. The Arctic Research and Policy Act (ARPA) of 1984 (Title I of P.L. 98-373 of July 31, 1984) “provide[s] for a comprehensive national policy dealing with national research needs and objectives in the Arctic.” The National Science Foundation (NSF) is the lead federal agency for implementing Arctic research policy. Key U.S. policy documents relating to the Arctic include National Security Presidential Directive 66/Homeland Security Presidential Directive 25 (NSPD 66/HSPD 25) of January 9, 2009; the National Strategy for the Arctic Region of May 10, 2013; the January 30, 2014, implementation plan for the 2013 national strategy; and Executive Order 13689 of January 21, 2015, on enhancing coordination of national efforts in the Arctic. The office of the U.S. Special Representative for the Arctic has been vacant since January 20, 2017. The Arctic Council, created in 1996, is the leading international forum for addressing issues relating to the Arctic. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) sets forth a comprehensive regime of law and order in the world’s oceans, including the Arctic Ocean.
  • Marelli D6C & D5C ATEX Motor Technical Catalogue

    Marelli D6C & D5C ATEX Motor Technical Catalogue

    Motors for This catalogue refers to ATEX Motors belonging to Group I Category M2 and Group II Category 2G, 2D, 2GD as described. STANDARDS ® BEARINGS Hazardous Areas The ATEX Motors described in this catalogue are manufactured in accordance with IEC 60034-1-5-6-7-8-9-12-14, IEC 60072-1, EN 50347, EN 60079- D5, D6 SERIES Frame Size (mm) D - end N - end Frame Size Poles B 3 V 1 MarelliMotori 0-1-7, EN 61241-0-1. 71* 6202-2Z 6202-2Z D - end N - end D - end N - end I M2, II 2G, II 2D EUROPEAN DIRECTIVES 355-400 2 6217-C3 6217-C3 6217-C3 7217 B 80* 6204-2Z 6204-2Z Ex d/de I, Ex d/de IIB, Ex tD A21 IP65 Title Directive 90* 6205-2Z 6205-2Z 355 4 NU222-C3 6217-C3 NU222-C3 6217-C3 + 7217 B Equipment and protective system intended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres (ATEX) 94/9/EC 100* 6206-2Z 6206-2Z 400 4 NU222-C3 6222-C3 NU222-C3 6222-C3 + 7222 B Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) 2004/108/IEC 112* 6206-2Z 6206-2Z Low Voltage Directive (LVD) 2006/95/EC 132* 6308-2Z 6308-2Z HEADQUARTERS ITALIAN OFFICES Machinery Directive (MD) 98/37/EC 160 - 180M 6310-Z-C3 6209-Z-C3 Marelli Motori S.p.A. Milan CERTIFICATES 180L 6310-Z-C3 6210-Z-C3 Via Sabbionara, 1 Via Cesare Cantù, 29 200 6312-Z-C3 6210-Z-C3 Frame size Number Temperature Limits 36071 Arzignano (VI) Italy 20092 Cinisello Balsamo (MI) Italy 225 6313-Z-C3 6213-Z-C3 71-132 BVI 08 ATEX 0001 -20°C +40°C* 160-315 CESI 02 ATEX 071 -20 C +40 C* 250 6314-Z-C3 6213-Z-C3 (T) +39.0444.479711 (T) +39.02.660.131.66 ° ° These tables describe the bearing types used in standard configurations.
  • Affordable Housing for Rent

    Affordable Housing for Rent

    Affordable Housing for Rent 924 Myrtle Avenue Apartments 7 NEWLY CONSTRUCTED UNITS AT 924 Myrtle Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11206 Bedford-Stuyvesant Amenities: Bike Room, Rooftop Deck, Gym, Virtual Doorman, Balcony, Card-Operated Laundry Room Transit: Train: G, Buses: B54, B43, No application fee • No broker’s fee • Smoke-free building • More information: http://bit.ly/924Myrtle This building is anticipated to receive a Tax Exemption through the 421a Tax Incentive program of the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development. Who Should Individuals or households who meet the income • A percentage of units is set aside for applicants with Apply? and household size requirements listed in the disabilities: table below may apply. Qualified applicants will o Mobility (5%) be required to meet additional selection criteria. o Vision/Hearing (2%) Applicants who live in New York City receive a general preference for apartments. AVAILABLE UNITS AND INCOME REQUIREMENTS 3 1 House-hold Annual Household Income Unit Size Monthly Rent Units Available 2 Size Minimum – Maximum4 Studio $1,975 1 → 1 person $67,715 - $95,030 1 person $72,000 - $95,030 1 bedroom $2,100 1 → 2 people $72,000 - $108,550 1 person $75,772 - $95,030 1 bedroom $2,210 1 → 2 people $75,772 - $108,550 2 people $87,429 - $108,550 2 bedroom $2,550 1 → 3 people $87,429 - $122,070 4 people $87,429 - $135,590 2 people $91,406 - $108,550 5 2 bedroom 0% MEDIAN AREA INCOME (AMI) UNITS $2,666 3 → 3 people $91,406 - $122,070 13 4 people $91,406 - $135,590 1 Tenant is responsible for electricity (including electric stove, hot water and heat).
  • Latent Class Analysis to Classify Patients with Transthyretin Amyloidosis by Signs and Symptoms

    Latent Class Analysis to Classify Patients with Transthyretin Amyloidosis by Signs and Symptoms

    Neurol Ther DOI 10.1007/s40120-015-0028-y ORIGINAL RESEARCH Latent Class Analysis to Classify Patients with Transthyretin Amyloidosis by Signs and Symptoms Jose Alvir . Michelle Stewart . Isabel Conceic¸a˜o To view enhanced content go to www.neurologytherapy-open.com Received: February 21, 2015 Ó The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com ABSTRACT status measures for the latent classes were examined. Introduction: The aim of this study was to Results: A four-class latent class solution was develop an empirical approach to classifying thebestfitforthedata.Thelatentclasseswere patients with transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) characterized by the predominant symptoms based on clinical signs and symptoms. as severe neuropathy/severe autonomic, Methods: Data from 971 symptomatic subjects moderate to severe neuropathy/low to enrolled in the Transthyretin Amyloidosis moderate autonomic involvement, severe Outcomes Survey were analyzed using a latent cardiac, and moderate to severe neuropathy. class analysis approach. Differences in health Incorporating disease duration improved the model fit. It was found that measures of health Electronic supplementary material The online status varied by latent class in interpretable version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40120-015-0028-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to patterns. authorized users. Conclusion: This latent class analysis approach On behalf of the THAOS Investigators. offered promise in categorizing patients with ATTR across the spectrum of disease. The four- Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number, class latent class solution included disease NCT00628745. duration and enabled better detection of J. Alvir (&) heterogeneity within and across genotypes Statistical Center for Outcomes, Real-World and than previous approaches, which have tended Aggregate Data, Global Medicines Development, Global Innovative Pharma Business, Pfizer, Inc., to classify patients a priori into neuropathic, New York, NY, USA cardiac, and mixed groups.
  • Ancient Fennoscandian Genomes Reveal Origin and Spread of Siberian Ancestry in Europe

    Ancient Fennoscandian Genomes Reveal Origin and Spread of Siberian Ancestry in Europe

    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07483-5 OPEN Ancient Fennoscandian genomes reveal origin and spread of Siberian ancestry in Europe Thiseas C. Lamnidis1, Kerttu Majander1,2,3, Choongwon Jeong1,4, Elina Salmela 1,3, Anna Wessman5, Vyacheslav Moiseyev6, Valery Khartanovich6, Oleg Balanovsky7,8,9, Matthias Ongyerth10, Antje Weihmann10, Antti Sajantila11, Janet Kelso 10, Svante Pääbo10, Päivi Onkamo3,12, Wolfgang Haak1, Johannes Krause 1 & Stephan Schiffels 1 1234567890():,; European population history has been shaped by migrations of people, and their subsequent admixture. Recently, ancient DNA has brought new insights into European migration events linked to the advent of agriculture, and possibly to the spread of Indo-European languages. However, little is known about the ancient population history of north-eastern Europe, in particular about populations speaking Uralic languages, such as Finns and Saami. Here we analyse ancient genomic data from 11 individuals from Finland and north-western Russia. We show that the genetic makeup of northern Europe was shaped by migrations from Siberia that began at least 3500 years ago. This Siberian ancestry was subsequently admixed into many modern populations in the region, particularly into populations speaking Uralic languages today. Additionally, we show that ancestors of modern Saami inhabited a larger territory during the Iron Age, which adds to the historical and linguistic information about the population history of Finland. 1 Department of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, 07745 Jena, Germany. 2 Institute for Archaeological Sciences, Archaeo- and Palaeogenetics, University of Tübingen, 72070 Tübingen, Germany. 3 Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, PL 56 (Viikinkaari 9), 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
  • DNV Classification Note 31.2 Strength Analysis of Hull Structure in Roll

    DNV Classification Note 31.2 Strength Analysis of Hull Structure in Roll

    CLASSIFICATION NOTES No. 31.2 STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF HULL STRUCTURE IN ROLL ON/ROLL OFF SHIPS AND CAR CARRIERS APRIL 2011 The content of this service document is the subject of intellectual property rights reserved by Det Norske Veritas AS (DNV). The user accepts that it is prohibited by anyone else but DNV and/or its licensees to offer and/or perform classification, certification and/or verification services, including the issuance of certificates and/or declarations of conformity, wholly or partly, on the basis of and/or pursuant to this document whether free of charge or chargeable, without DNV's prior written consent. DNV is not responsible for the consequences arising from any use of this document by others. DET NORSKE VERITAS Veritasveien 1, NO-1322 Høvik, Norway Tel.: +47 67 57 99 00 Fax: +47 67 57 99 11 FOREWORD DET NORSKE VERITAS (DNV) is an autonomous and independent foundation with the objectives of safeguarding life, property and the environment, at sea and onshore. DNV undertakes classification, certification, and other verification and consultancy services relating to quality of ships, offshore units and installations, and onshore industries worldwide, and carries out research in relation to these functions. Classification Notes Classification Notes are publications that give practical information on classification of ships and other objects. Examples of design solutions, calculation methods, specifications of test procedures, as well as acceptable repair methods for some components are given as interpretations of the more general rule requirements. All publications may be downloaded from the Society’s Web site http://www.dnv.com/. The Society reserves the exclusive right to interpret, decide equivalence or make exemptions to this Classification Note.