Carter, Vance Confer on Middle East
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress
Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress September 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL32665 Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The current and planned size and composition of the Navy, the annual rate of Navy ship procurement, the prospective affordability of the Navy’s shipbuilding plans, and the capacity of the U.S. shipbuilding industry to execute the Navy’s shipbuilding plans have been oversight matters for the congressional defense committees for many years. In December 2016, the Navy released a force-structure goal that calls for achieving and maintaining a fleet of 355 ships of certain types and numbers. The 355-ship goal was made U.S. policy by Section 1025 of the FY2018 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 2810/P.L. 115- 91 of December 12, 2017). The Navy and the Department of Defense (DOD) have been working since 2019 to develop a successor for the 355-ship force-level goal. The new goal is expected to introduce a new, more distributed fleet architecture featuring a smaller proportion of larger ships, a larger proportion of smaller ships, and a new third tier of large unmanned vehicles (UVs). On June 17, 2021, the Navy released a long-range Navy shipbuilding document that presents the Biden Administration’s emerging successor to the 355-ship force-level goal. The document calls for a Navy with a more distributed fleet architecture, including 321 to 372 manned ships and 77 to 140 large UVs. A September 2021 Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report estimates that the fleet envisioned in the document would cost an average of between $25.3 billion and $32.7 billion per year in constant FY2021 dollars to procure. -
An Interview with CAPT James A. Kirk, USN, Commanding Officer, USS ZUMWALT (DDG 1000) Conducted by CAPT Edward Lundquist, USN (Ret)
SURFACE SITREP Page 1 P PPPPPPPPP PPPPPPPPPPP PP PPP PPPPPPP PPPP PPPPPPPPPP Volume XXXII, Number 4 December 2016 An Interview with CAPT James A. Kirk, USN, Commanding Officer, USS ZUMWALT (DDG 1000) Conducted by CAPT Edward Lundquist, USN (Ret) How would you describe this ship to someone who is not familiar LCS was another ship designed for a very small crew size enabled with DDG 1000? What makes this ship special? by automation. Originally, the crew was going to be 40, with the To a layman, I would describe it as a very large stealth surface objective of 15. And this was another ship, very small crew size, combatant; that generates 78 megawatts of power, enough to which some people would say that the crew size was originally power a small-to-medium size town; and with capabilities like directed as an arbitrary number. But LCS has had problems other destroyers, to do the typical missions that destroyers do with the size of the crew in managing a ship like that. Have you – anti-submarine warfare, anti-air warfare, anti-surface warfare, had or have you learned any lessons from watching how LCS – and the like. Then there are the unique aspects, because of the through their watch standing or their crew training, you know ship’s stealth and its combined their hybrid sailors – have you capabilities, particularly the learned some lessons that advanced gun system (AGS). have been helpful with how We have volume precision you man and train the ship? fires to support the Marines, Certainly there’s been lessons Army, or SEALs that are ashore that have been observed and or going ashore. -
Joint Force Quarterly, Issue
Issue 100, 1st Quarter 2021 Countering Chinese Coercion Remotely Piloted Airstrikes Logistics Under Fire JOINT FORCE QUARTERLY ISSUE ONE HUNDRED, 1 ST QUARTER 2021 Joint Force Quarterly Founded in 1993 • Vol. 100, 1st Quarter 2021 https://ndupress.ndu.edu GEN Mark A. Milley, USA, Publisher VADM Frederick J. Roegge, USN, President, NDU Editor in Chief Col William T. Eliason, USAF (Ret.), Ph.D. Executive Editor Jeffrey D. Smotherman, Ph.D. Senior Editor and Director of Art John J. Church, D.M.A. Internet Publications Editor Joanna E. Seich Copyeditor Andrea L. Connell Book Review Editor Brett Swaney Creative Director Marco Marchegiani, U.S. Government Publishing Office Advisory Committee BrigGen Jay M. Bargeron, USMC/Marine Corps War College; RDML Shoshana S. Chatfield, USN/U.S. Naval War College; BG Joy L. Curriera, USA/Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy; Col Lee G. Gentile, Jr., USAF/Air Command and Staff College; Col Thomas J. Gordon, USMC/Marine Corps Command and Staff College; Ambassador John Hoover/College of International Security Affairs; Cassandra C. Lewis, Ph.D./College of Information and Cyberspace; LTG Michael D. Lundy, USA/U.S. Army Command and General Staff College; MG Stephen J. Maranian, USA/U.S. Army War College; VADM Stuart B. Munsch, USN/The Joint Staff; LTG Andrew P. Poppas, USA/The Joint Staff; RDML Cedric E. Pringle, USN/National War College; Brig Gen Michael T. Rawls, USAF/Air War College; MajGen W.H. Seely III/Joint Forces Staff College Editorial Board Richard K. Betts/Columbia University; Eliot A. Cohen/The Johns Hopkins University; Richard L. -
Appendix As Too Inclusive
Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen Appendix I A Chronological List of Cases Involving the Landing of United States Forces to Protect the Lives and Property of Nationals Abroad Prior to World War II* This Appendix contains a chronological list of pre-World War II cases in which the United States landed troops in foreign countries to pro- tect the lives and property of its nationals.1 Inclusion of a case does not nec- essarily imply that the exercise of forcible self-help was motivated solely, or even primarily, out of concern for US nationals.2 In many instances there is room for disagreement as to what motive predominated, but in all cases in- cluded herein the US forces involved afforded some measure of protection to US nationals or their property. The cases are listed according to the date of the first use of US forces. A case is included only where there was an actual physical landing to protect nationals who were the subject of, or were threatened by, immediate or po- tential danger. Thus, for example, cases involving the landing of troops to punish past transgressions, or for the ostensible purpose of protecting na- tionals at some remote time in the future, have been omitted. While an ef- fort to isolate individual fact situations has been made, there are a good number of situations involving multiple landings closely related in time or context which, for the sake of convenience, have been treated herein as sin- gle episodes. The list of cases is based primarily upon the sources cited following this paragraph. -
Navies and Soft Power Historical Case Studies of Naval Power and the Nonuse of Military Force NEWPORT PAPERS
NAVAL WAR COLLEGE NEWPORT PAPERS 42 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE WAR NAVAL Navies and Soft Power Historical Case Studies of Naval Power and the Nonuse of Military Force NEWPORT PAPERS NEWPORT 42 Bruce A. Elleman and S. C. M. Paine, Editors U.S. GOVERNMENT Cover OFFICIAL EDITION NOTICE The April 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil-rig fire—fighting the blaze and searching for survivors. U.S. Coast Guard photograph, available at “USGS Multimedia Gallery,” USGS: Science for a Changing World, gallery.usgs.gov/. Use of ISBN Prefix This is the Official U.S. Government edition of this publication and is herein identified to certify its au thenticity. ISBN 978-1-935352-33-4 (e-book ISBN 978-1-935352-34-1) is for this U.S. Government Printing Office Official Edition only. The Superinten- dent of Documents of the U.S. Government Printing Office requests that any reprinted edition clearly be labeled as a copy of the authentic work with a new ISBN. Legal Status and Use of Seals and Logos The logo of the U.S. Naval War College (NWC), Newport, Rhode Island, authenticates Navies and Soft Power: Historical Case Studies of Naval Power and the Nonuse of Military Force, edited by Bruce A. Elleman and S. C. M. Paine, as an official publica tion of the College. It is prohibited to use NWC’s logo on any republication of this book without the express, written permission of the Editor, Naval War College Press, or the editor’s designee. For Sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402-00001 ISBN 978-1-935352-33-4; e-book ISBN 978-1-935352-34-1 Navies and Soft Power Historical Case Studies of Naval Power and the Nonuse of Military Force Bruce A. -
Brett J. Morash, Ph.D. 115 Lawrence Place, New Rochelle, NY 10801 Linkedin: Twitter: @Bmorash
Brett J. Morash, Ph.D. 115 Lawrence Place, New Rochelle, NY 10801 Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/brettmorash Twitter: @bmorash Experience Director of Operations and Finance 2015 – Present Bob Woodruff Foundation, New York City, New York Earned the Charity Navigator Four Star 97.24% rating, Guidestar Platinum Seal rating, and BBB Certification in all 20 non-profit standards. Completed 3 annual audit, and IRS 990 reporting cycles with no discrepancies. Directed and controlled the day-to-day operations of the premier veteran focused foundation in the nation. This includes all payroll, HR, IT, contracting, insurance, and legal functions. Fiscal responsibility for a grant making process distributing in excess of $4.8M of private philanthropic grants to non-profits across the country, and a $3.2M Charitable Engagements budget with an overall operating budget of $11M per annum. Oversaw multiple projects simultaneously ranging from donor relations with high net worth individuals, development of corporate partnerships, and working with a Board of Directors made up of Global Celebrities and Fortune 500 CEOs. Led the Development and Events Team to execute the Stand Up For Heroes event at Madison Square Garden Theater, raising over $6.4M in unrestricted revenue for the Foundation's operations. Reduced management cost to 4.75% of operating expenses in less than 1 year. Established Salesforce as an integrated CRM solution to manage all functions of the team in less than six months, while maintaining ongoing operations. Speaker on non-profit finance at a national level conference. Adjunct Professor 2012 – Present Norwich University, Northfield VT Adjunct Professor in Norwich University’s exclusive program for active duty Special Operations personnel and veterans. -
Spring 2017 ‘A Little Light on What’S Going On!’
StarshellVolume VII, No. 78, Spring 2017 ‘A little light on what’s going on!’ The Naval Association of Canada OUR COVER ~ GOOD OL’ NAVY RESOURCEFULNESS! No, this is not intended to show the RCN at its worst but rather at its best, resolving a potentially disastrous situation by exhibiting good old navy inge- nuity! Built for the RN at Vancouver but transferred to the RCN for manning, the Bangor-class minesweeper Lockeport was commissioned on 27 May 1942 and served with Esquimalt Force until 17 March 1943 when she sailed for Halifax. Upon her arrival there on 30 April, she was assigned briefly to WLEF and in June to Halifax Force. In November and December 1943 she was loaned to Newfoundland Force but was withdrawn due to engine trouble. On 9 January 1944, while enroute to Baltimore for refit, her engines broke Starshell down during a storm and she made 190 miles under improvised sail, sewing ISSN-1191-1166 hammocks together and lashing them to the masts as a foresail and mizzen, before being towed the rest of the way to her destination. Upon her return National magazine of the Naval Association of Canada to Halifax in April, Lockeport was ordered to Bermuda to work up, and on Magazine nationale de L’Association Navale du Canada the homeward journey she escorted the boats of the 78th Motor Launch Flo- tilla. Returning to Sydney Force in 1944 she was frequently an escort to the www.navalassoc.ca Port-aux-Basques ferry. She left Canada on 27 May 1945 for the UK and was returned to the RN at Sheerness on 2 July to be broken up three years later. -
Network Centric Warfare in the U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet
Network Centric Warfare in the U.S. Navy’s Fifth Fleet Network-Supported Operational Level Command and Control in Operation Enduring Freedom Dr. Mark Adkins Director of Research Ph.D Human Communication [email protected] Dr. John Kruse Director of Programming Ph.D Management Information Systems [email protected] Outline • Environment • Theory • Investigation • Findings • Other Lessons • Implications • Questions 2 6/16/2004 NCW Case Studies Environment Who: U.S. Navy’s Commander Task Force Fifty (CTF-50) aboard the USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) – Carrier Group Three (CARGRU3) – Air Wing Eleven (CVW11) – Destroyer Squadron Nine (DESRON9) 3 6/16/2004 NCW Case Studies Environment When: Operation Enduring Freedom, July 2001 – January 2002 Mazar-e Qandahar Sharif Falls Falls CARL VINSON Armed Move to Terror Kabul Departs Recon Close Air Homecoming Attacks Support Falls JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN Northern Port Visits War Tora Bora Alliance Begins CARL VINSON Offensive CARL VINSON Arrives in Begins Departs North Arabian North Arabian Sea Sea 4 6/16/2004 NCW Case Studies TRANSIT Depart Anti-Sub 23 Jul Warfare Exercise Dual Battle Group 4-7 Aug Operations 17 Aug Farrallon de Medinilla 12-13 Aug Thailand Port Visit 23-27 Aug Carrier Qualifications Kaula Rock 27-29 Jul Wake Island 3-4 Aug 8-9 Aug North Arabian Sea 11 Sep Singapore Port Visit 28 Aug - 3 Sep EN ROUTE NORTHERN ARABIAN GULF FOR OPERATION SOUTHERN WATCH / MARITIME INTERDICTION OPERATIONS VS IRAQ 5 6/16/2004 NCW Case Studies COMCARGRU3 Org Chart 6 6/16/2004 NCW Case Studies CTF-50 Org Chart CTF-50 7 6/16/2004 NCW Case Studies Envrionment 59 Coalition Ships (6 Aircraft Carriers in RED) USS Carl Vinson USS Antietam USS Ingraham JDS Hamana ITS Garibaldi USS O’Kane JDS Kirisame ITS Aviere USS Sacramento JDS Kurama ITS Zeffiro USS Key West JDS Towada ITS Etna USS Enterprise USS Olympia USS Nicholson USS Peleliu USS Obrien USS Comstock USS McFaul USS Dubuque FS Courbet HMAS Sydney USS Arctic USS John Young FS Var HMAS Anzac USS Providence USS Russell HMAS Kanimbla USS John Paul Jones USS T. -
Naval Accidents 1945-1988, Neptune Papers No. 3
-- Neptune Papers -- Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945 - 1988 by William M. Arkin and Joshua Handler Greenpeace/Institute for Policy Studies Washington, D.C. June 1989 Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945-1988 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nuclear Weapons Accidents......................................................................................................... 3 Nuclear Reactor Accidents ........................................................................................................... 7 Submarine Accidents .................................................................................................................... 9 Dangers of Routine Naval Operations....................................................................................... 12 Chronology of Naval Accidents: 1945 - 1988........................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Sources and Acknowledgements........................................................................ 73 Appendix B: U.S. Ship Type Abbreviations ............................................................................ 76 Table 1: Number of Ships by Type Involved in Accidents, 1945 - 1988................................ 78 Table 2: Naval Accidents by Type -
Rep. Segal Offered the Following Resolution: House Resolution No
Rep. Segal offered the following resolution: House Resolution No. 281. A resolution in support of naming a new United States Navy Littoral Combat Ship for Battle Creek, Michigan. Whereas, The following active and stricken ships have, or have had, name ties to the State of Michigan: USS Detroit, USS Flint, USS Grand Rapids, USS Gerald R. Ford, USS Grayling, USS Isle Royale, USS John C. Calhoun, USS Kalamazoo, USS Lake Erie, USS Michigan, USS Saginaw, and USS Saugatuck; and Whereas, Battle Creek, Michigan is a unique military community with a long and rich history of service to the United States of America; and Whereas, Beginning in 1917 with the establishment of Camp Custer as the Midwest's largest Army training site, Battle Creek was the induction point for tens of thousands of soldiers in World Wars I and II; and Whereas, Fort Custer continues today as a 6,000-acre National Guard and Reserve Midwest Training site for the National Guard and civilian law enforcement agencies and is part of Battle Creek's Joint Reserve Base; and Whereas, Battle Creek is also home to Michigan's Air National Guard and the 110th Airlift Wing and Battle Creek airmen have been deployed multiple times with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in Operation Deny Flight in Kosovo and have served in wartime efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan; and Whereas, Based at the W.K. Kellogg Airport, with a 10,000-foot runway, the 110th Airlift Wing of the Air National Guard is now flying the C-21 as an interim mission, awaiting the delivery of the new C-27J Joint Cargo -
REPORT to CONGRESS BIENNIAL ASSESSMENT of the SHIP DISPOSAL PROGRAM January 2018
U. S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration REPORT TO CONGRESS BIENNIAL ASSESSMENT OF THE SHIP DISPOSAL PROGRAM January 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 1 I. GOVERNMENT OWNED VESSELS 4 Government Owned Vessels by Agency………………………………………….….. 4 II. PLANNED VESSEL OBSOLESCENCE AND SERVICE RETIREMENT 8 Agency Planned Vessel Retirement Schedules ……………………………………… 8 III. DISPOSAL OF GOVERNMENT OWNED VESSELS IN THE US ……………. 10 Legislative Limitation ………………………………………………………………... 10 MARAD Federal Ship Outreach Program. ………………………………………..…. 10 Domestic Scrap Steel Prices …………………………………………………………. 10 Scrap Steel Market Outlook ………………………………………………………….. 13 Domestic Ship Recycling Industry…………………………………………………… 13 Domestic Ship Recycling Capacity ………..……………………………………...…. 15 MARAD Ship Disposal Program ……………………….…………………….……... 16 Historic Low Number of MARAD Ships Awaiting Disposal ………………………. 17 Simplified Acquisition for Vessel Recycling ………………………………………... 17 MARAD Ship Disposal Solicitation Process ………………………………………… 18 Submittal of General Technical Proposal – Step One ……………………………….. 18 General Technical Proposal Evaluation Criteria …………………………………….. 19 Submittal of Sales Offers or Price Revisions – Step Two …………………………… 20 Evaluation and Award of Sales and Price Quotations ……………………………….. 21 Basis for Best-Value Award …………………………………………………………. 21 MARAD Vessel Awards by Fiscal Year …………………………………………….. 22 MARAD Ship Disposal Funding …………………………………………………….. 22 Navy Ship Disposal Program ………………………………………………………… 25 Environmental -
Alumni Awards Program 2020.Pdf
The Evening’s Program Master of Ceremonies ............................. James F. Tobin ’77 President, USMMA Alumni Association and Foundation Regimental Fanfare Trumpets/Color Guard Invocation ............................. LCDR David Pahs, CHC, USN Command Chaplain Alumni Salutation..................................James L. Hamilton ’77 Chairman, USMMA Alumni Association and Foundation Alumni Congratulations……. RADM Jack Buono ’78 Superintendent, US Merchant Marine Academy Awards Kings Pointer of the Year Distinguished Service Award Peter J. Rackett ’61 Lifetime Achievement Award Kenneth A. DeGhetto ’43 Development Award Daniel E. Meehan ’51 Humanitarian Award Joseph M. Baker, Jr. ‘47 Award CAPT Michael Walker ’69 Memorial Award Meritorious Alumni Service Award Outstanding Professional Achievement Award Alumni Chapter Presidents’ Award Silver Mariner Award Awards Committee Gordon E. Inouye ’65—Chairman Donald T. Mathiesen ’62 Richard J. Halluska ’69 Edward K. Moe ’76 Steven B. Dalton ‘81 Susan D. Orsini ‘88 Monica L. Malone ’93 William L. Rung –’70 – 50 year rep Dana T. Jones ’95 -25 year rep KINGS POINTER OF THE YEAR Robert J. Lavinia ’70 began his career in 1970 at the Gulf Oil Corporation as a licensed officer in their US flag tanker fleet. He transferred to Gulf International Trading Company, and after several promotions, left Gulf Oil in 1980 to work for Phibro Energy Corporation. In 1985 he transferred to Hill Petroleum Company, Phibro's refining company. He was President and Chief Executive Officer for both entities. In 1992 he joined Tosco Corporation. During Bob's tenure at Tosco, the Corporation made several acquisitions, to include British Petroleum Northwest, Circle K Company, and Union 76 Products Company. Bob served as President for each of those companies as well as Senior Vice President of Tosco Corporation.