Director: Bryan Singer. Valkyrie. Hollywood: United Artists, 2008. Film. Rated PG-13 for violence and brief strong language. Country: USA and . Runtime: 121 min.

Reviewed by Edward N. Snyder

Published on H-German (October, 2009)

Commissioned by Benita Blessing (Oregon State University)

When I frst heard that Tom Cruise would U.S.-style republic. Ultimately, historians should play Colonel Claus von Staufenberg in the flm consider Valkyrie a success, because it introduces Valkyrie, my initial reaction was to recoil in hor‐ the audience not only to the July 1944, conspiracy, ror at the thought of Cruise tarnishing the legacy but also to several of the larger questions and de‐ of the great hero of German resistance during bates surrounding the nature of German resis‐ World War II. Furthermore, I could only imagine tance to the Third . the damage an American popular flm director Valkyrie opens with Staufenberg on the bat‐ (Bryan Singer) would do to the memory of this im‐ tlefelds of Tunisia just before an Allied air raid at‐ portant aspect of the war. I expected to hear tacks the German division and severely wounds Staufenberg, , and the other leaders Staufenberg in the process. In the meantime, of the July 1944 plot proclaim a belief in freedom Henning von Treschkow attempts to assassinate and democracy in the face of Nazi tyranny. I Hitler by sending a bomb disguised as a bottle of feared that the complex debates the resistors had alcohol on a plane carrying Hitler back from the about their vision for postwar Germany would go eastern front. The bomb fails to detonate, howev‐ unmentioned. I thus entered the theater with a er, and Treschkow hurriedly travels to Berlin to number of reasons why I wanted to dislike this retrieve the package. On screen, the two events flm. happen concurrently. In fact, Treschkow's assassi‐ However, I was pleasantly surprised by nation attempt occurred on March 13, 1943, al‐ Valkyrie and its depiction of the 1944 attempt to most one month before Staufenberg sufered his assassinate . Cruise's energetic por‐ injuries. The flm also uses Treschkow's plan to trayal of Staufenberg was entirely satisfactory stand in for other assassination plots; several pre‐ and, at times, even enjoyable. More important, di‐ vious attempts to eliminate Hitler had been made. rector Bryan Singer did a respectable job of high‐ However, due to numerous mechanical problems, lighting the conficts and debates that arose with‐ coincidence, and the Führer's unusually good in the circle of resistors prior to the assassination luck, all of these attempts failed. attempt. Although Singer did not articulate fully When Treschkow went to retrieve the bomb, the issues of contention among the resistors, he he learned that the had arrested Hans Os‐ nevertheless made clear that the 1944 plot leaders ter, a member of the conspiracy. Treschkow then did not intend to replace the Third Reich with a instructed General to fnd a re‐ H-Net Reviews placement for Oster. Olbricht selected Staufen‐ tance activities, but the greater population also berg and invited the colonel to a meeting with the stigmatized them as traitors for years after the other conspiracy leaders. Before the meeting, war. Peter Hofmann, a consultant for the flm Staufenberg explained to Olbricht why he was and an eminent scholar on the German resis‐ willing to engage in resistance: "I am a soldier. I tance, argued this point in his book Staufenbergs serve my country, but this is not my country.... I Freund, which describes the problems that the re‐ know now there is only one way to serve Ger‐ sistor Joachim Kuhn faced following his release many, and in doing so I’ll be a traitor. I accept from a Soviet prison several years after the war. that." This brief exchange with Olbricht is key to [1] understanding the anxieties of many resistors in Furthermore, by asking what would happen deciding to engage in resistance activity. Staufen‐ after Hitler, Staufenberg opened the door to dis‐ berg saw himself as remaining true to his princi‐ cussing one of the larger and more interesting ples of protecting the German nation, while ac‐ questions surrounding the German resistance to knowledging that the majority of Germans would Nazism: what ultimately pushed the various cir‐ view any attempt to destroy Nazism as treason. In cles comprising the resistance to act, and what did the flm as in the historical record, it is a testa‐ they envision for a post-Hitler Germany? Al‐ ment to Staufenberg's personal courage that he though the flm hints at the real motivations be‐ did not back out of the plot even after recognizing hind , it never deals with the the dangers that the assassination attempt would question directly. When Staufenberg frst enters pose to both himself and his family. the meeting, the leaders of the conspiracy are His co-conspirators, however, were not quite complaining that unless they act quickly, the Al‐ as thoughtful. During the meeting, Staufenberg lies will soon overrun Germany and "all of Europe asked them what their plan was for post-Hitler will pay a price." Certainly, many members of the Germany. He knew they could not simply assassi‐ resistance were not necessarily supporters of nate Hitler and expect to end the war and destroy Nazism; they were nevertheless willing to tolerate the Nazi regime. Yet some of the conspirators be‐ the ideology insofar as it advanced Germany's lieved such a quick solution possible. In response standing within Europe, a point made by Hans to Staufenberg's question, one of the resistors ar‐ Mommsen in his work on the German resistance. rogantly replied: "You are in the presence of men [2] The impetus to remove Hitler only grew who would have been in Hitler's inner circle. In‐ stronger once the conspirators realized that stead, we refused, Colonel. The people know we Nazism was leading Germany (as well as Europe) put our principles above personal gain. We have on a path to catastrophic destruction. Along with the respect of the people and the army." These few co-conspirator Carl Goerdeler's assertion that the sentences conveyed the challenges those engaged conspiracy comprised principled men who con‐ in resistance activities faced. sciously chose to oppose Nazism, the flm thus Nonetheless, the scene is not without its presents a misleadingly unifed picture of the re‐ faws. For those unfamiliar with the history of the sistance. In reality, the conspirators' relationship German resistance, the conspirators' reaction to with the regime was much more complex. For in‐ Staufenberg's question could give the impression stance, the resistors did make a conscious deci‐ that the German public supported the plotters and sion to oppose Nazism actively, yet many of them any attempt to throw of the yoke of Nazism. No had initially been sympathetic to the regime and such grand coalition existed. The Nazi regime its aims--something the flm fails to mention. They ruthlessly hunted those who engaged in resis‐

2 H-Net Reviews decided to resist only after they realized how de‐ Initially, Staufenberg traveled to the Wolf's structive and nihilistic the regime was. Lair on July 15, 1944 to carry out the assassina‐ Perhaps the greater failure of Valkyrie's por‐ tion, but aborted the mission after Heinrich trayal of Staufenberg's initial encounter with the Himmler failed to attend a planning session at the resistance is the response of the circle's leaders to bunker. Staufenberg returned to the bunker a the colonel’s question of what will happen after second time on July 20, 1944 and set the explo‐ Hitler. Sadly, Goerdeler's reply is not only mis‐ sives, even though the meeting had been moved leading, but it also misses the opportunity to ex‐ from the cement bunker outside to a wooden hut plore the fascinating debates within the conspira‐ due to the heat. The change in venue ultimately cy about how the resistance envisioned postwar reduced the impact of the explosion, allowing Germany. Certainly, Singer accurately illustrates Hitler to survive. Staufenberg, however, left the the arrogance and naivety of some elements of retreat before he determined whether or not he the resistance, but he also gives the impression had killed Hitler. Without confrmation that Hitler that it failed to give any serious thought to a post‐ had died in the blast, Olbricht hesitated to carry war government. The resistance leaders had no out Valkyrie back in Berlin. The hesitation proved real plan for post-Hitler Germany in part because fatal, because it allowed the regime to regroup their own political views difered signifcantly. and reassert its authority in the capital. Regime They detested the liberal and ofcials quickly arrested the leaders of the coup believed that the growth of mass political move‐ and executed them almost immediately. ments had prepared the ground for Nazism. They Shortly after the flm premiered in theaters, I thus were not ready to turn any power over to the began teaching a lifetime learning class at the people. Ultimately, they wanted Germans to University of Minnesota. I asked my students who forego political parties and embrace a corporatist had seen the flm what they thought of how it de‐ system in which the conspirators would play a picted the German resistance. Their responses leading role in the postwar government. eased my fears considerably. They overwhelming‐ The flm focuses on broader concepts of Oper‐ ly said that, although the flm did not discuss the ation Valkyrie, while also including enough de‐ postwar plans of the resistance, it nevertheless tails of the kind that audiences enjoy. For in‐ gave a clear impression that the leaders certainly stance, the plotters decided that Staufenberg had plans for a postwar Germany. Many said they would assassinate Hitler in his Wolf's Lair bunker left the flm wanting to learn more about the Ger‐ using pencil detonators. After setting the explo‐ man resistance, and were highly motivated to sives, he would then call Olbricht in Berlin, who read more on the subject. Only one student said would in turn arrest leading Nazi ofcials and later (jokingly, I hope) that the next time someone take control of the central government. These ac‐ decides to produce a flm on the resistance, he or tions would be justifed with the claim that the SS she should rewrite the ending to allow for the was really behind the assassination as part of a possibility of a sequel. larger coup attempt. The conspirators therefore Several students were particularly interested needed to take control of the government in order in the conspirators' attitudes towards the Holo‐ to prevent the coup. In order to legitimize their caust and German war crimes, which the flm actions, they rewrote the orders for Operation does not address. Early on, Staufenberg makes a Valkyrie accordingly and, after forging Friedrich comment indicating his disgust with the Nazis' Fromm's signature, Staufenberg asked Hitler to Jewish policy, but none of the other conspirators sign of on the revised plans. raise similar concerns. In some respects this ab‐

3 H-Net Reviews sence of discussion is appropriate, as the conspir‐ acy leaders never expressed overt concern for the Jews and other persecuted groups. However, they disagreed with Nazi racial policies in the East be‐ cause they feared it would undermine Germany's position as a future leader in the region. The flm‐ makers could have touched upon this question as a way to explain better the conspirators' post- Hitler vision. Despite its faws, Valkyrie is a flm that histo‐ rians should not dismiss. As a review in the Köl‐ ner Stadt-Anzeiger stated: "Was im Vorfeld so viele Bedenkenträger auf den Plan rief, nämlich dass der deutsche Widerstandsmythos durch die Weichzeichner Hollywoods gefltert werden kön‐ nte, entpuppt sich nicht nur als falsch und präjudizierend--im Gegenteil, die amerikanische Herkunft dieses Films ist sein größter Vorteil."[3] As a Hollywood flm, Valkyrie has the potential to reach a much larger audience than most histori‐ ans. The flm leaves much unsaid; however, any flm must work within the medium's limits while still telling a coherent and entertaining story. Valkyrie has created signifcant public interest in the German resistance, and historians should use this opportunity to teach their students and the broader public about the aspects of the resistance that the flm does not address. Despite its Holly‐ wood pedigree--or perhaps because of it--this is a positive tool for historians of modern Germany. Notes [1]. Peter Hofmann, Staufenbergs Freund: Die tragische Geschichte des Widerstand‐ skämpfers Joachim Kuhn (München: C. H. Beck Verlag, 2007). [2]. See Hans Mommsen, Germans Against Hitler: The Staufenberg Plot and Resistance Un‐ der the Third Reich (New York: I. B. Taurus, 2009) [3]. Frank Olbert, "Der versehrte Held," Köl‐ ner Stadt-Anzeiger (Cologne, Germany), Decem‐ ber 19, 2008.

’

4 H-Net Reviews

If there is additional discussion of this review, you may access it through the network, at https://networks.h-net.org/h-german

Citation: Edward N. Snyder. Review of Director: Bryan Singer. Valkyrie. H-German, H-Net Reviews. October, 2009.

URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=25886

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

5