The Complete Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Karl Abraham

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Complete Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Karl Abraham THE COMPLETE CORRESPONDENCE OF SIGMUND FREUD AND KARL ABRAHAM THE COMPLETE CORRESPONDENCE OF SIGMUND FREUD AND KARL ABRAHAM 1 9 0 7 - 1 9 2 5 Completed Edition transcribed and edited by Ernst Falzeder translated by Caroline Schwarzacher with the collaboration of Christine Trollope & Klara Majthenyi King Introduction by Andre Haynal & Ernst Falzeder First published 2002 by H. Karnac (Books) Ltd. Published 2018 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business Freud material copyright© 1965, 2002 by A. W. Freud et al. Abraham material copyright © 1965, 2002 by the Estate of Grant Allan Editorial material and annotations copyright © 2002 by Ernst Falzeder Introduction copyright © 2002 by Andre Haynal Translation copyright © 2002 by Caroline Schwarzacher Facsimiles of letters on pp. ii, 442, and 495 and photographs on pp. xxii, xxv, and 453 reproduced by courtesy of the Freud Museum by agreement with Sigmund Freud Coprights Ltd. A Psycho-Analytic Dialogue. The Letters of Sigmund Freud and Karl Abraham 1907-1926 (ed. Hilda C. Abraham and Ernst Freud). London: The Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1965. The rights of the authors, editor, and translator to be identified as the authors of this work have been asserted in accordance with §§ 77 and 78 of the Copyright Design and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A C.I.P. for this book is available from the British Library Edited and designed by Communication Crafts ISBN 13: 978-1-85575-051-7 (hbk) CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vii PREFACE ix INTRODUCTION Andre Haynal & Ernst Falzeder xix EDITORIAL NOTE XXXi t r a n s l a t o r 's n o t e xxxiii ABBREVIATIONS XXXV Correspondence 1907 Letters 1-13 1 1908 Letters 14-57 16 1909 Letters 58-80 74 1910 Letters 81-98 101 1911 Letters 99-118 124 1912 Letters 119-147 145 1913 Letters 148-189 173 1914 Letters 190-262 214 1915 Letters 263-285 295 1916 Letters 286-305 322 1917 Letters 306-330 341 1918 Letters 331-348 368 v vi CONTENTS 1919 Letters 349-367 390 1920 Letters 368-385 415 1921 Letters 386-406 437 1922 Letters 407-415 452 1923 Letters 416-427 463 1924 Letters 428-469 479 1925 Letters 470-500 533 1926 Letter 501 568 REFEREN < 569 IN DEX 609 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The spiritus rector of this work has been Cesare Sacerdoti, formerly of Kar- nac Books, who initiated this project and, despite serious difficulties, sup­ ported it throughout. I am deeply indebted to Andre Haynal in too many ways to be mentioned here; suffice it to say that without his help this project would not have been realized. My special thanks go to Caroline Schwarz- acher, and for much more than the translation— in many respects this vol­ ume is a joint work by her and myself. Klara Majthenyi King has been indefatigable and conscientious. I gratefully acknowledge the support and assistance of my friends and colleagues Carlo Bonomi, Florence Borner, Eva Brabant, Bettina Decke, Judith Dupont, Norman Elrod, Michael Good, Bern- hard Handlbauer, the late Peter Heller, Axel Hoffer, Peter Hoffer, Robert Kramer, Marina Leitner, Patrick Mahony, William McGuire, Mark Paterson, the late Helene Rank Veltfort, Alvaro Rey de Castro, Paul Ries, Paul Roazen, Thomas Roberts, Elisabeth Roudinesco, Sonu Shamdasani, Giorgio Simo- netto, Maud Struchen, and Urban Zerfaft. E.F. vii PREFACE In 1965, a selection of the letters of Sigmund Freud and Karl Abraham was published by The Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psycho-Analysis under the title, A Psycho-Analytic Dialogue. It was edited by Abraham's daughter Hilda, who also translated her father's letters, and Freud's son Ernst; Freud's letters were translated by Eric Mosbacher.1 Following the letters to Wilhelm Fliess (Freud, 1950a), the correspondence with Oskar Pfister (Freud & Pfister, 1963), and a selection of letters to various correspondents (Freud, 1960a), it was the fourth volume of Freud letters to be published. There followed, before the end of the decade, the exchanges with Lou Andreas- Salome (Freud & Andreas-Salome, 1966), with Arnold Zweig (Freud & A. Zweig, 1968), with Georg Groddeck (Freud & Groddeck, 1970), and with Edoardo Weiss (Freud & Weiss, 1970). None of these was a complete, unabridged edition: whole letters were left out, and passages that were considered unimportant, repetitive, indis­ creet, offensive, or not fit for print for whatever other reason were deleted. Sometimes the place where something had been omitted was marked, sometimes not; in no case was it indicated how many words, phrases, or paragraphs had been omitted. There were occasions when the original wording was changed in order to cover up the omissions. Patients' names— and in some instances the names of analysts and colleagues—were made anonymous through the use either of their surname initial or of arbitrary letters or combinations of letters; in addition, the various editors did not use the same pseudonyms for the same analysands. The transcriptions of the originals on which these publications were based contained a number of errors, some of which altered or inverted the meaning. The editorial notes, where they existed at all, were sparse and sometimes misleading or wrong. The English translations generally added a further distortion. They often suffered from a poor command either of German— in particular of Freud's IX IX X PREFACE Jewish-Viennese variety of it—or of English, as well as of the theory and history of psychoanalysis, psychiatry, neurology, arts, or literature. In addi­ tion, there was a tendency to water down or even to launder Freud's emphatic, often indiscreet, offensive, pejorative remarks about third per­ sons. As a result, until the mid-1970s, what the reader—the English-speak­ ing reader in particular—took to be Freud's letters was not Freud but a censored and distorted version of what he had actually written. In the introduction of the 1965 edition of the Freud-Abraham letters, Hilda Abraham and Ernst Freud state: Omissions and cuts have been made for reasons of discretion where names and facts might lead to recognition of patients or their families, or where the people discussed would not be of any interest nowadays; furthermore to avoid repetition or details about the various psycho-analytical organisations which were of purely local interest and, finally, to avoid unimportant per­ sonal details about the writers and their families, which do not contribute to the knowledge and understanding of their personalities and of their scientific work. [p. vii] When these abridged editions appeared, many of those involved were still alive, and the editors— not scholars, but children, friends, or disciples of the correspondents— had an understandable interest in preserving a modicum of privacy and discretion. Although Anna Freud did not edit any of her father's correspondence herself, she was the "grey eminence" behind most of those editions—such as being chiefly responsible for the selection of letters. Despite their shortcomings, these early editions were a valuable addition to the literature and served a purpose. Let us only remind our­ selves, for example, of the first edition of the Fliess letters—saved by Marie Bonaparte, in contravention of Freud's intention to buy and destroy them— which instigated a large number of investigations on the origins of psycho­ analysis. In 1974, the nearly unabridged Freud-Jung letters appeared, meticu­ lously edited by William McGuire (Freud & Jung, 1974). For the first time, there was a reliable and almost complete text2 of a Freud correspondence, substantially enriched with generous and accurate notes. McGuire's edito­ rial apparatus was used for years to come as one of the most important reference works on the background of psychoanalytic history. There fol­ lowed the letters to Fliess (Freud, 1985c), Silberstein (Freud, 1989a), and Binswanger (Freud & Binswanger, 1992), all of them unabridged but still using pseudonyms. The three-volume Freud-Ferenczi correspondence (Freud & Ferenczi, 1992, 1996, 2000) and the letters exchanged with Ernest Jones (1993) were the first to include the full names of analysands. The present edition is, after the Fliess letters, the second to have been published first abridged and then in complete form, and the first completed edition to give all the names mentioned by the letter writers. PREFACE XI Why a complete new edition? Apart from making the whole story, not just a version in usum delphini, available to the public, such an unabridged version allows the reader to compare it with the expurgated one. Both volumes are not only highly important source material for the history of psychoanalysis but, at the same time, a reflection of changing attitudes towards how this material should be presented—so that they themselves represent a part of the making and construction of the history of psychoanal­ ysis. The omissions, alterations, and misunderstandings in the cut versions affect at times major and at times minor issues. But even these "minor" points are significant and may give us surprising insights. They are more than lacunae and unimportant trifles. Moreover: In its implications the distortion of a text resembles a murder: the difficulty is not in perpetrating the deed, but in getting rid of its traces.
Recommended publications
  • Five Formations of Publicity: Constitutive Rhetoric from Its Other Side
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF SPEECH, 2018 VOL. 104, NO. 2, 189–212 https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2018.1447140 Five formations of publicity: Constitutive rhetoric from its other side Jason D. Myres Communication Studies, University of Georgia, Athens, USA ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY This essay rethinks the constitutive formation of publics by Received 20 February 2017 foregrounding the desirability of publics themselves. This project Accepted 15 January 2018 begins by theoretically resituating publics as a series of KEYWORDS irrevocably lost objects. Specifically, I contend publics are Donald J. Trump; desire; composed of a montage of desires (oral, anal, phallic, scopic, and ’ public; prosopopeia; superego) modeled on Jacques Lacan s stages of the object in metonymy obsessional neurosis. To explicate, I use this schema to parse the symbolic dimensions of the “people” aligned with Donald J. Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. Lacan’s schema of the object is adapted into a theory of publicity exemplified in the (astonishing) resilience of the “Trump voter,” the imaginary “people” routinely invoked throughout his emergence as a political figure. Lacan’s schema, I argue, helps explain the symbolic staging of the “Trump voter” as something more than just another potent social imaginary: an object of desire. Working from recent scholarship of Barbara Biesecker, Christian Lundberg, Joshua Gunn, and a growing number of others, this essay theorizes public formation from the standpoint of desire. However, I have a different emphasis in mind: rather than studying the for- mation of publics, I demarcate five potential con-formations of publicity that undergird publics as epiphenomena. This schema of desire refers not to a universal structure, but a partitioning that introduces difference within and between modes of public formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Jung, New York, 1912 Sonu Shamdasani
    Copyrighted Material IntroductIon: Jung, neW York, 1912 Sonu Shamdasani September 28, 1912. the New York Times featured a full-page inter- view with Jung on the problems confronting america, with a por- trait photo entitled “america facing Its Most tragic Moment”— the first prominent feature of psychoanalysis in the Times. It was Jung, the Times correctly reported, who “brought dr. freud to the recognition of the older school of psychology.” the Times went on to say, “[H]is classrooms are crowded with students eager to under- stand what seems to many to be an almost miraculous treatment. His clinics are crowded with medical cases which have baffled other doctors, and he is here in america to lecture on his subject.” Jung was the man of the hour. aged thirty-seven, he had just com- pleted a five-hundred-page magnum opus, Transformations and Sym‑ bols of the Libido, the second installment of which had just appeared in print. following his first visit to america in 1909, it was he, and not freud, who had been invited back by Smith ely Jelliffe to lec- ture on psychoanalysis in the new international extension course in medicine at fordham university, where he would also be awarded his second honorary degree (others invited included the psychiatrist William alanson White and the neurologist Henry Head). Jung’s initial title for his lectures was “Mental Mechanisms in Health and disease.” By the time he got to composing them, the title had become simply “the theory of Psychoanalysis.” Jung com- menced his introduction to the lectures by indicating that he in- tended to outline his attitude to freud’s guiding principles, noting that a reader would likely react with astonishment that it had taken him ten years to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Sigmund Freud Papers
    Sigmund Freud Papers A Finding Aid to the Papers in the Sigmund Freud Collection in the Library of Congress Digitization made possible by The Polonsky Foundation Manuscript Division, Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 2015 Revised 2016 December Contact information: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/mss.contact Additional search options available at: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/eadmss.ms004017 LC Online Catalog record: http://lccn.loc.gov/mm80039990 Prepared by Allan Teichroew and Fred Bauman with the assistance of Patrick Holyfield and Brian McGuire Revised and expanded by Margaret McAleer, Tracey Barton, Thomas Bigley, Kimberly Owens, and Tammi Taylor Collection Summary Title: Sigmund Freud Papers Span Dates: circa 6th century B.C.E.-1998 Bulk Dates: (bulk 1871-1939) ID No.: MSS39990 Creator: Freud, Sigmund, 1856-1939 Extent: 48,600 items ; 141 containers plus 20 oversize and 3 artifacts ; 70.4 linear feet ; 23 microfilm reels Language: Collection material in German, with English and French Location: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Summary: Founder of psychoanalysis. Correspondence, holograph and typewritten drafts of writings by Freud and others, family papers, patient case files, legal documents, estate records, receipts, military and school records, certificates, notebooks, a pocket watch, a Greek statue, an oil portrait painting, genealogical data, interviews, research files, exhibit material, bibliographies, lists, photographs and drawings, newspaper and magazine clippings, and other printed matter. The collection documents many facets of Freud's life and writings; his associations with family, friends, mentors, colleagues, students, and patients; and the evolution of psychoanalytic theory and technique. Selected Search Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the Library's online catalog.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Psychoanalytic Developmental Theories Joseph Palombo • Harold K
    Guide to Psychoanalytic Developmental Theories Joseph Palombo • Harold K. Bendicsen Barry J. Koch Guide to Psychoanalytic Developmental Theories iv Joseph Palombo Harold K. Bendicsen 626 Homewood Ave, Suite 307 640 E. Belmont Ave. Highland Park IL 60035 Addison IL 60101 USA USA Barry J. Koch 1117 Rosedate St. Castle Rock CO 80104 USA ISBN 978-0-387-88454-7 e-ISBN 978-0-387-88455-4 DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-88455-4 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2009926237 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) v To the students, graduates, and faculty of the Chicago Institute for Clinical Social Work JP To the memory of Paul Stein & Morris Sklansky my teachers and mentors whose influence endures HB To Jennifer, Kelsey, and Carly BK vii Preface This work was an outgrowth of our frustration as teachers.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Journal of Medical Psychology
    Psychiatric Bulletin (1992), 16,28-29 The British Journal ofMedicalPsychology JOHN BIRTCHNELL (Current Editor) and SIDNEY CROWN (immediate past Editor) The British Journal of Medical Psychology is the During its 70 year history, the Journal has second most profitable ofthe eight specialist journals acquired considerable prominence, particularly for of the British Psychological Society and has an inter­ the part it has played in the development of psycho­ national circulation of around 2,300. It is unusual in analytic theory. In alphabetical order, some of its that it is the only one of the journals which is edited more notable contributors have been: Karl Abraham by a psychiatrist. While this has helped maintain (1923), Alfred Adler (1924), Mary Ainsworth (1951), valuable links between the professions ofpsychology Michael Argyle (1974), Michael Balint (several), and psychiatry, the BPS membership is becoming Don Bannister (1966), W. R. Bion (1949), John increasingly intolerant of this state of affairs. The Bowlby (1956, 1957 and 1958), Cyril Burt (1923, point is often made that the Royal College would 1926 and 1938), Alex Comfort (1977), Derek never sanction a psychologist editing one of its Russell Davis (several), Henry Dicks (several), Hans journals. We would like to believe that this is not Eysenck (several), Ronald Fairbairn (many), Sandor true. The procedure for the selection of new editors Ferenczi (1928), Michael Fordham (several), was recently modified to make it less likely that a Graham Foulds (1973), S. H. Foulkes (several), psychiatrist will be appointed next time. Some may Thomas Freeman (several), Edward Glover (sever­ regret such a development, while others may con­ al), Bob Gosling (1978), George Groddeck (1929 and sider it only right that what may be perceived as a 1931), H.
    [Show full text]
  • Karen Horney Vs. Sigmund Freud
    Karen Horney vs. Sigmund Freud: Breaking Barriers in Psychoanalysis for Women as a Woman Cate Boyette Individual Performance Senior Division Process Paper: 492 words Boyette 1 Last summer, I was a volunteer at a coding camp for gifted, disadvantaged elementary school girls. At the camp, we used a book titled Women in Science-- 50 Fearless Pioneers Who ​ Changed the World. After doing National History Day for two years, I knew I wanted to do it ​ again, and I was on the lookout for topics to fit the theme of Breaking Barriers in History. After I read the excerpt on Karen Horney, I immediately knew I wanted to tell her story. The way she challenged Freudian beliefs for having both misogynistic and scientific flaws during a time when promoting such ideas could ruin one’s reputation as a psychoanalyst clearly broke barriers. She also paved the way for women who wanted to pursue psychoanalysis and specialize in adult therapy. Because my topic this year was more academic in nature, my research process differed from previous years. I immediately noticed that primary sources were easier to find, especially medical articles, journals from the time, and the works of Horney and other psychoanalysts. My most useful primary sources were the two books by Horney. I used Feminine Psychology to ​ ​ explain her counter-argument to Freud´s popular theory on the castration complex in women and I used Neurosis and Human Growth to discuss her anti-Freudian beliefs. What was difficult to ​ ​ ​ ​ find were high-quality secondary sources. Since most of my primary sources focused on particular aspects of Horney's life, I tried looking for a biography.
    [Show full text]
  • FROM FEMININE SEXUALITY to JOUISSANCE AS SUCH Silvia Tendlarz
    EXPRESS DECEMBER 2017 VOLUME 3 - ISSUE 12 THE MIRACLE OF LOVE: FROM FEMININE SEXUALITY TO JOUISSANCE AS SUCH SILVIA TENDLARZ The LC EXPRESS delivers the Lacanian Compass in a new format. Its aim is to deliver relevant texts in a dynamic timeframe for use in the clinic and in advance of study days and conference meetings. The LC EXPRESS publishes works of theory and clinical practice and emphasizes both longstanding concepts of the Lacanian tradition as well as new cutting edge formulations. lacaniancompass.com PRÉCIS On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 New York Freud lover is the one who doesn’t have and doesn’t know Lacan Analytic Group (now Lacanian Compass) what is missing, and the loved one has, but doesn’t presented a lecture by Silvia Tendlarz. Held at the know what he or she has.” Continuing to Seminar X, CUNY Graduate Center’s Department of Psycholo- Tendlarz highlighted love as a mediation between gy, the presentation culminated a month-long sum- jouissance and desire. This mediation exposed the mer program dedicated to readings from Jacques- antimony between an autoerotic jouissance and Alain Miller’s course, The Experience of the Real in desire which reaches towards the Other. Psychoanalysis. The second part of the talk, titled “The Tempta- Opening with the biblical creation of Eve from tion of Desire,” examined the different dialectics the rib of Adam, Tendlarz began her inquiry into of desire operating in the masculine and feminine feminine jouissance, masculine jouissance, and subjective positions. In the feminine position, “de- jouissance of the body beyond the Oedipal frame.
    [Show full text]
  • Freud, Censorship and the Re-Territorialization of Mind
    BJHS 45(2): 235–266, June 2012. © The Author(s) (2012) Published by The British Society for the History of Science and Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/S000708741200009X Blacked-out spaces: Freud, censorship and the re-territorialization of mind PETER GALISON* Abstract. Freud’s analogies were legion: hydraulic pipes, military recruitment, magic writing pads. These and some three hundred others took features of the mind and bound them to far-off scenes – the id only very partially resembles an uncontrollable horse, as Freud took pains to note. But there was one relation between psychic and public act that Freud did not delimit in this way: censorship, the process that checked memories and dreams on their way to the conscious. (Freud dubbed the relation between internal and external censorship a ‘parallel’ rather than a limited analogy.) At first, Freud likened this suppression to the blacking out of texts at the Russian frontier. During the First World War, he suffered, and spoke of suffering under, Viennese postal and newspaper censorship – Freud was forced to leave his envelopes unsealed, and to recode or delete content. Over and over, he registered the power of both internal and public censorship in shared form: distortion, anticipatory deletion, softenings, even revision to hide suppression. Political censorship left its mark as the conflict reshaped his view of the psyche into a society on a war footing, with homunculus-like border guards sifting messages as they made their way – or did not – across a topography of mind. Caviar, sex and death Censorship came early and often to Vienna.
    [Show full text]
  • Karen Horney (1885-1952)
    The International Journal of Indian Psychology ISSN 2348-5396 (e) | ISSN: 2349-3429 (p) Volume 5, Issue 1, DIP 18.01.001/20170501 DOI: 10.25215/0501.001 http://www.ijip.in | October-December, 2017 TimeLine Person of the Month: Karen Horney (1885-1952) Ankit Patel1* Born 16 September 1885 Blankenese, Schleswig-Holstein, Prussia, German Empire (now Blankenese, Hamburg,Germany) Died 4 December 1952, New York City, New York, United States Citizenship German Known for Psychoanalyst Feminist Psychology Education The University of Freiburg (1900) The University of Göttingen (1908) Karen Horney (nee Danielson) was born near Hamburg, Germany on September 16, 1885. Her father was a religious, authoritarian ship's captain, while her mother was a well-educated, more liberal intellectual who encouraged Danielson in her studies. Her father was a widower with four teenage children. Danielson was the second child from his new marriage, the first being a favoured older brother. Unflattering comments by her father relating to both her looks and her intelligence led Danielson to decide, at the age of nine, that if she couldn't be pretty, then she would be smart. At age nine she also battled depression for the first time and would continue the battle throughout her life. At 13, Danielson decided she wanted to become a doctor - a lofty and perhaps not very realistic goal for a young woman in the late 19th century. Without her parents' support, Danielson nonetheless entered medical school in 1906 as one of the first women to enter a German university. While there, she met economics major and aspiring law student, Oskar Horney, and the two married in 1909.
    [Show full text]
  • The Subject of Jouissance: the Late Lacan and Gender and Queer Theories
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 5-2019 The Subject of Jouissance: The Late Lacan and Gender and Queer Theories Frederic C. Baitinger The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/3243 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] THE SUBJECT OF JOUISSANCE: THE LATE LACAN AND GENDER AND QUEER THEORIES by FRÉDÉRIC BAITINGER A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in the French Program in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2019 © 2019 FRÉDÉRIC BAITINGER !ii All Rights Reserved The Subject of Jouissance: The Late Lacan and Gender and Queer Theories by Frédéric Baitinger This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in the French Program in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 03 / 21 / 2019 Royal S. Brown ————————— ———————————————— Date Chair of Examining Committee 03 / 21 / 2019 Maxime Blanchard ————————— ———————————————— Date Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Royal S. Brown Francesca Canadé Sautman Raphaël Liogier !iii THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK ABSTRACT The Subject of Jouissance: The Late Lacan and Gender and Queer Theories by Frédéric Baitinger Adviser: Royal S. Brown The Subject of Jouissance argues that Lacan’s approach to psychoanalysis, far from being heteronormative, offers a notion of identity that deconstructs gender as a social norm, and opens onto a non-normative theory of the subject (of jouissance) that still remains to be fully explored by feminist, gender, and queer scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • 9781782206521.Pdf
    Ferenczi’s Influence on Contemporary Psychoanalytic Traditions This collection covers the great variety topics relevant for understanding the importance of Sándor Ferenczi and his influence on contemporary psychoanalysis. Pre-eminent Ferenczi scholars were solicited to contribute succinct reviews of their fields of expertise. The book is divided in five sections. ‘The historico-biographical’ describes Ferenczi’s childhood and student days, his marriage, brief analyses with Freud, his correspondences and contributions to the daily press in Budapest, exploration of his patients’ true identities, and a paper about his untimely death. ‘The development of Ferenczi’s ideas’ reviews his ideas before his first encounter with psychoanalysis, his relationship with peers, friendship with Groddeck, emancipation from Freud, and review of the importance of his Clinical Diary. The third section reviews Ferenczi’s clinical concepts and work: trauma, unwelcome child, wise baby, identification with aggressor, mutual analysis, and many others. In ‘Echoes’, we follow traces of Ferenczi’s influence on virtually all traditions in contemporary psychoanalysis: interpersonal, independent, Kleinian, Lacanian, relational, etc. Finally, there are seven ‘application’ chapters about Ferenczi’s ideas and the issues of politics, gender and development. Aleksandar Dimitrijević, PhD, is interim professor of psychoanalysis and clinical psychology at the International Psychoanalytic University, Berlin, Germany. He is a member of the Belgrade Psychoanalytical Society (IPA) and Faculty at the Serbian Association of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapists (EFPP), and the editor or co-editor of ten books or special journal issues, as well as author of many conceptual and empirical papers, about attachment theory and research, psychoanalytic education, psychoanalysis and the arts. Gabriele Cassullo is a psychologist, psychotherapist, doctor in research in human sciences and interim professor in psychology at the Department of Psychology, University of Turin.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Psychoanalytic Theory of Financial Corruption
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Middlesex University Research Repository TOWARDS A PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY OF FINANCIAL CORRUPTION Stella N. Orakwue A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Phd in Psychoanalysis awarded by Middlesex University TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface 5 Abstract 6 Introduction 8 Chapter one: Psychoanalysis, ‘Money’ and Corruption: A Survey 15 Part one: Psychoanalysis and its Applications 1. Psychoanalysis as Methodology 2. On Being ‘Wealthy’ and Having ‘Money’ 3. Using Freudian Theories: The Example of Keynes Part two: Classical Psychoanalysis and ‘Money’ 4. The ‘Anal Theory of Money’: Freud, Ferenczi, Abraham and Jones 5. Otto Fenichel’s Drive to Amass Wealth 6. Classical Psychoanalysis: Historical Contexts 7. The Critique of Classical Psychoanalytic Texts 8. Jacques Derrida and the Return to the Past Part three: Contemporary Psychoanalytic Texts 9. The Post-Classical Psychoanalysis of ‘Money’ 10. The Encounter in the Consulting Room Part four: Psychoanalysis, ‘Money’ and Corruption 11. Towards of Psychoanalytic Theory of Financial Corruption 12. Indicative Writings from the 1960s 13. A Particular Type of Greed? 14. Preliminary Conclusions Chapter two: On the Delineation of the Anal Theory of Money 56 1. Forming Symbols 2 2. Embarking on the Road Towards a Psychoanalytic Theory of ‘Money’ 3. Symbolising the Desired Object or Idea 4. On Symbolism in General 5. Symbolising ‘Money’ 6. Conclusion: Failing the Requirements to Symbolise Money in the Unconscious Chapter three: The Complexities of ‘Money’ in the Consulting Room 79 1. Is ‘Money’ Nodal? 2. Theoretical Epistles on ‘Money’ 3.
    [Show full text]