DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Financing 58 Cluster B: Risk Management 62 Cluster C: Procurement 64 Cluster D: Project Design 67 8.CONCLUSION: SHORT- and MEDIUM-TERM RESPONSES 68

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Financing 58 Cluster B: Risk Management 62 Cluster C: Procurement 64 Cluster D: Project Design 67 8.CONCLUSION: SHORT- and MEDIUM-TERM RESPONSES 68 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized © 2011 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org All rights reserved 1 2 3 4 14 13 12 11 This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgement on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; fax: 978-750-4470; Internet: www. copyright.com. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2422; e-mail: [email protected]. ISBN: 978-0-8213-8703-0 eISBN: 978-0-8213-8704-7 DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-8703-0 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data has been requested. Cover, title page, and photos not listed below: Courtesy of the General Directory of Roads and Motorways, Katowice Branch Cover design: David Bringas, Escriba Editors Photo credits: p. 37: UIO Final: Final approach to Quito Airport, Andy Ricover, 2007 p. 40: HKG Boarding area: Hong Kong Terminal Building boarding area, Andy Ricover, 2007 p. 53: MUC Boarding area: Munich Airport Terminal Building boarding area, Andy Ricover, 2008 p. 56: HKG Entrance: Hong Kong Terminal Building entrance, Andy Ricover, 2007 II CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS VI ABBREVIATIONS VII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VIII PART I - BACKGROUND, APPROACH, AND SECTOR TRENDS 1 1.INTRODUCTION 2 Context of the Study 2 Approach to the Study 3 Report Structure 3 2. BENEFITS AND RISKS OF PPP 5 Policy: What Are Public-Private Partnerships? 5 Strategy: Designing Support Frameworks and Building Capacity 6 3.OVERVIEW OF RECENT TRENDS IN PPP INVESTMENT 8 Global Trends in PPP Investment in Infrastructure 8 PPP Situation in Europe and Central Asia 11 Global Improvement in PPP Activity in 2009 15 Recent Developments in ECA Countries 17 Developments in Western Europe and Rest of the World 23 PART II - HOW THE CRISIS HAS CHANGED THE PPP MARKET 25 4.IMPACT OF THE CRISIS ON GOVERNMENT FINANCING 26 Economic and Fiscal Impact of the Crisis in ECA 26 5.IMPACT OF THE CRISIS ON PPP PROJECTS 32 Policy: Impact on Public Investment 34 Strategy: Impact on Project Scope and Finance 38 Implementation: Impact on Commercial Structure and Procurement 42 PART III - RECOMMENDATIONS FOR GOVERNMENTS 43 6.RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POST-CRISIS PPP ENVIRONMENT 44 Policy 44 Strategy 47 Improving the PPP Framework 49 Implementation 51 Project Preparation 53 Procurement and Financial Close 55 7.MECHANISMS AVAILABLE TO GOVERNMENT TO SUPPORT PPP PROJECTS 57 Cluster A: Project Financing 58 Cluster B: Risk Management 62 Cluster C: Procurement 64 Cluster D: Project Design 67 8.CONCLUSION: SHORT- AND MEDIUM-TERM RESPONSES 68 REFERENCES 71 ANNEX I: LIST OF INTERVIEWS CONDUCTED 75 ANNEX II: PPP INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE III AND PRE-CRISIS EXPERIENCE 77 ANNEX III: PRINCIPLES IN INFRASTRUCTURE AND PROJECT FINANCE 89 ANNEX IV: IMPACT OF THE FINANCIAL CRISIS ON FISCAL SPACE AND INFRASTRUCTURE SPENDING IN ECA 97 ANNEX V: INSTRUMENT 111 BOXES Box 3-1: Romania’s Comarnic-Brasov Highway Project 18 Box 3-2: Slovak Republic – Flexibility in Financing Terms and Government Payments 19 Box 3-3: St. Petersburg – Pulkovo Expansion Project 20 Box 3-4: Armenia Water Sector – A Successful Progressive Approach to Use of PPP 21 Box 3-5: Recent PPP Experience in Brazil, India, and Mexico 24 Box 5-1: Latvia’s Fiscal Restrictions and Impact on PPP 35 Box 5-2: Russia’s Privatization Plans in the Transport Sector 37 Box 5-3: Spain and Portugal – A Record of Rapid Financial Closure 40 Box 5-4: Investment Funds and Other Government-funded Solutions 41 Box 7-1: Evolution in Contract Design: CREMA – Phases I and II 61 Box 7-2: Refinancing Gain – HM Treasury Guidance 63 Box 7-3: Hedging and Concessionaire’s Capital Grant 64 Box 7-4: Indexation and Compensation to Canada Line 68 Box II-1: Eurostat Accounting of PPP Projects 80 Box II-2: South Africa – Assessing PPP Transactions 82 Box II-3: Chile Management of Contingent Liabilities 83 Box III-1: Environmental and Social impacts of PPPs and the Equator Principles 95 Box III-2: Examples of Financial Instruments to Support PPP 96 FIGURES Figure 1-1. Chapter Outline 4 Figure 2-1: Decision Matrix for PPP Projects 6 Figure 2-2: Traditional PPP Framework 6 Figure 3-1: Global PPP Investment 8 Figure 3-2: Global PPP Investment in Transport 9 Figure 3-3: PPP Sector Investments and Projects by Sector in ECA 11 Figure 3-4: PPP Investment and Number of Projects in Other Regions 12 Figure 3-5: PPP Investment in Transport in ECA 13 Figure 3-6: PPP Investment in Energy in ECA 13 Figure 3-7: PPP Investment in Water and Sanitation in ECA 14 Figure 3-8: Recent Global Trends in PPP Investment 15 Figure 3-9: Recent Regional Trends in PPP Investment 15 Figure 3-10: Number of PPP Projects in Tender (Fall 2009) 23 Figure 4-1: Fiscal Balance, Percentage of GDP (2005–2013) 27 Figure 4-2: Real GDP Growth, Annual Percentage Rate (2005–2013) 27 Figure 4-3: Contributions of Changes in Deficits, 2008–2009, % of GDP (median values) 28 IV Figure 4-5: EMBIG Europe Region – Spread over US Treasury in Basis Points (bps) 29 Figure 4-6: Some Government Bond Yields in ECA 30 Figure 4-7: Currency Depreciation in Some European Countries 31 Figure 5-1: Impact of the Crisis on PPP Projects 32 Figure 5-2: Changes in PPP Market 33 Figure 5-3: Pipeline of PPP Projects in Some ECA Countries 36 Figure 5-4: Time to Reach Financial Close in 2008-09 in EU and ECA (Highways) 38 Figure 5-5: Number of Banks Involved in 2008-09 in EU and ECA (Highways) 39 Figure 5-6: Effect of Shorter Maturity on Government Contribution 41 Figure 6-1: Framework for Assessing Country Risk 45 Figure 6-2: Updated Framework for PPP 46 Figure 6-3: Framework for PPP Strategy 47 Figure 6-4: New Framework for PPP 49 Figure 6-5: Framework for Identifying PPP Projects 52 Figure 6-6: Policies/Design Influencing Investment Needs of an Urban Transport Project 54 Figure 7-1: Summary of Supporting Mechanisms to PPP Program 57 Figure II-1: Cash Flow for PPP and Publicly Financed Projects 78 Figure II-2: Sources of Revenue for PPP and Public Highway 84 Figure IV-1: Fiscal Balance, Percentage of GDP (2005-13) 98 Figure IV-2: Real GDP Growth, Annual Percentage Rate (2005-13) 98 Figure IV-3: General Government Revenue, 2000-07 (% of GDP) 99 Figure IV-4: General Government Spending, 2000-07 (% of GDP) 100 Figure IV-5: Improving Fiscal Balances 2000-07 101 Figure IV-6: Contributions of Changes in Deficits, 2008-09, % of GDP (median values) 102 Figure IV-7: Fiscal Space in ECA Countries in 2007 103 Figure IV-8: Spending on Social Assistance and Insurance, % of GDP 104 Figure IV-9: Percentage of Firms Indicating that Electricity is Some Form of Constraint to Business in ECA 105 Figure IV-10: Economic Classification of Government Expenditures, 2008 106 Figure IV-11: High Social Spending Crowds Out Spending on Infrastructure in ECA 107 MAPS Map IV-1: Difference in Level of Capital Expenditure - 2008 to 2009 (% of GDP) 108 Map IV-2: Relative Change in Capital Spending as a Percent of Government Spending 2008 to 2009 108 TABLES Table 3-1: Sources of Funding for Projects Reaching Financial/Contractual Close during January 2008-June 2009 16 Table 4-1: Summary of Crisis Effects on Government 26 Table III-1: Factors Influencing Project Bankability 93 Table IV-1: Trends in Capital Expenditure (% of GDP) in ECA 2000-01 109 V ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report was written by Vickram Cuttaree (Member of the Global Expert Team on PPP and PPP-Coordinator, Sustainable Development Department, Europe and Central Asia Region) and Cledan Mandri-Perrott (Member of the Global Expert Team on PPP and Senior Infrastructure Specialist, Finance Economic and Urban Department). David Stiggers (Consultant on PPP) undertook the initial research which forms the basis of this report. This work was financed by a grant from the Transport Research Support (TRS). The team acknowledges contributions from: Cesar Queiroz (Consultant), who advised on the highway sector and helped the team reach public sector agencies in the ECA Region; Anita Shrestha (Operations Analyst), Teuta Kacaniku (Consultant), and Jukka-Pekka Strand (Financial Analyst), for providing most of the quantitative analysis presented in this report and contributing to specific chapters.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WBIF Monitoring Report Published
    MONITORING REPORT May 2021 MONITORING REPORT Abbreviations and acronyms AFD Agence Française de Développement KfW kfW Development Bank bn Billion MD Main Design CBA Cost-Benefit Analysis m Million CD Concept Design PD Preliminary Design CEB Council of Europe Development Bank PFG Project Financiers’ Group CF Co-financing / Investment Grant PFS Pre-feasibility Study DD Detailed Design PIU Support to Project Implementation Unit EWBJF European Western Balkans Joint Fund PSD Public Sector Development EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and RBMP River Basin Management Plan Development REEP/REEP Plus Regional Energy Efficiency Programme for EBRD SSF EBRD Shareholder Special Fund the Western Balkans EFA Economic and Financial Appraisal SC Steering Committee EIA Environmental Impact Assessment SD Sector Development EIB European Investment Bank SDP Sector Development Project EFSE European Fund for Southeast Europe SIA Social Impact Assessment ESIA Environmental and Social Impact SOC Social Sector Assessment SOW Supervision of Works ENE Energy Sector TA Technical Assistance ENV Environment Sector TMA Technical and Management Assistance EU European Union ToR Terms of Reference EWBJF European Western Balkans Joint Fund TRA Transport Sector FAA Financial Affordability Analysis WB EDIF Western Balkans Enterprise and Innovation FS Feasibility Study Facility GGF Green for Growth Fund WBG World Bank Group ID Identification WBIF Western Balkans Investment Framework IFI International Financial Institution WWTP Wastewater Treatment Plant IPA Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance IPF Infrastructure Project Facility IRS Interest Rate Subsidies This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the Western Balkans Investment Framework and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Documents.Worldbank.Org
    46730 THE WORLD BANK GROUP WASHINGTON, D.C. TP-23 TRANSPORT PAPERS NOVEMBER 2008 Public Disclosure Authorized Road User Charges: Current Practice and Perspectives in Central and Eastern Europe Cesar Queiroz, Barbara Rdzanowska, Robert Garbarczyk and Michel Audige Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized TRANSPORT SECTOR BOARD ROAD USER CHARGES: CURRENT PRACTICE AND PERSPECTIVES IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE Cesar Queiroz, Barbara Rdzanowska, Robert Garbarczyk and Michel Audige THE WORLD BANK WASHINGTON, D.C. © 2008 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This volume is a product of the staff of The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; fax: 978-750-4470; Internet: www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]
  • DLA Piper. Details of the Member Entities of DLA Piper Are Available on the Website
    EUROPEAN PPP REPORT 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report has been published with particular thanks to: The EPEC Executive and in particular, Livia Dumitrescu, Goetz von Thadden, Mathieu Nemoz and Laura Potten. Those EPEC Members and EIB staff who commented on the country reports. Each of the contributors of a ‘View from a Country’. Line Markert and Mikkel Fritsch from Horten for assistance with the report on Denmark. Andrei Aganimov from Borenius & Kemppinen for assistance with the report on Finland. Maura Capoulas Santos and Alberto Galhardo Simões from Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados for assistance with the report on Portugal. Gustaf Reuterskiöld and Malin Cope from DLA Nordic for assistance with the report on Sweden. Infra-News for assistance generally and in particular with the project lists. All those members of DLA Piper who assisted with the preparation of the country reports and finally, Rosemary Bointon, Editor of the Report. Production of Report and Copyright This European PPP Report 2009 ( “Report”) has been produced and edited by DLA Piper*. DLA Piper acknowledges the contribution of the European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC)** in the preparation of the Report. DLA Piper retains editorial responsibility for the Report. In contributing to the Report neither the European Investment Bank, EPEC, EPEC’s Members, nor any Contributor*** indicates or implies agreement with, or endorsement of, any part of the Report. This document is the copyright of DLA Piper and the Contributors. This document is confidential and personal to you. It is provided to you on the understanding that it is not to be re-used in any way, duplicated or distributed without the written consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of North Adriatic Ports
    THE ROLE OF NORTH ADRIATIC PORTS Chief Editor: Chen Xin Prepared by Science and Research Centre Koper, Slovenia University of Ljubljana, Slovenia Published by: China-CEE Institute Nonprofit Ltd. Telephone: +36-1-5858-690 E-mail: [email protected] Webpage: www.china-cee.eu Address: 1052, Budapest, Petőfi Sándor utca 11. Chief Editor: Dr. Chen Xin ISBN: 978-615-6124-07-4 Cover design: PONT co.lab Copyright: China-CEE Institute Nonprofit Ltd. The reproduction of the study or parts of the study are prohibited. The findings of the study may only be cited if the source is acknowledged. The Role of North Adriatic Ports Chief Editor: Dr. Chen Xin CHINA-CEE INSTITUTE Budapest, July 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ........................................................................................................ 3 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 5 2 PREVIOUS STUDIES .............................................................................. 8 3 NORTH ADRIATIC PORTS .................................................................. 11 3.1 Overview of the five main northern Adriatic ports .......................... 12 3.1.1 Ravenna................................................................................... 12 3.1.2 Venice (Venezia) ..................................................................... 15 3.1.3 Trieste ..................................................................................... 18 3.1.4 Koper .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Touch & Go and Touch 2 with Go
    Touch & Go and Touch 2 with Go Autumn 2018 map update release notes 4 more pages required in Autumn edition to fit information Keeping up to date with The Toyota Map Update Release Notes Map update information these and many more features: Touch & Go (CY11) helps you stay on track with the map Full map navigation Release date: Autumn 2018 Driver-friendly full map pan-European navigation updates of the Touch & Go and Touch 2 Version: 2018 with clear visual displays for signposts, junctions and lane with Go navigation systems. Database: 2018.Q1 guidance. Media: USB stick or download by user Speed limit and safety Toyota map updates are released at least once a year System vendor: Harman camera alerts Drive safely with the help of a and at a maximum twice. Coverage: Albania, Andorra, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia Herzegovina, speed limit display and warning, including an optional Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Gibraltar, France, speed warning setting. Alerts Keep up with the product information, map changes, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Latvia, notify you of fixed safety Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia (F.Y.R.O.M), Malta, Moldova, camera locations (in countries premium content and sales arguments. where it is legal). Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, San Marino, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Vatican. Intuitive detour suggestions Real-time traffic information Contents updates* alert you to Touch 2 with Go (CY13/16) congestion ahead on your planned route. The system Map update information 3 Release date: Autumn, 2018 calculates potential delay times and suggests a detour Navigation features 4 Version: 2018 to avoid the problem.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.4.5 Environmental Influences - 51 - Chapter 6
    POLITECNICO DI MILANO China’s “Belt and Road” Initiative and Its Spatial Impacts in Europe: Case study on projects in European countries with “B&R” involving Graduation Thesis Master of Urban Planning and Policy Design School of Architecture Urban Planning Construction Engineering(AUIC) ZHANG ZHEN KAI Supervisor: Prof. Valeria Fedeli Student Number:850133 2019 I Abstract: China proposed a global strategy, “The Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st-century Maritime Silk Road” (“B&R”), in 2013. It is an initiative of jointly building an economic corridor along the route of ancient “silk road” with countries on it. As of April 30, 2019, 131 countries and 30 international organizations have signed cooperation documents with China on the “B&R”. China came up with a few interventions e.g. China railway express and China-Central and Eastern European Countries cooperation (also known as “17+1”) to adapt “B&R” with European countries. Plenty of projects are developing or developed under “B&R” and “17+1”, the impacts of these projects in terms of urban developing can be concluded to urban transformation, migration, urban integration and urban desertification. To better succeeded the goals of the “B&R”, Communications and cooperation on both governmental and civil fields need to be strengthened and deepened to jointly face the challenges. Key words: “Belt and Road”, Urban transformation, Spatial impact, China, Europe. II Abstract in Italiao: Nel 2013 la Cina ha proposto una strategia globale, “zona economica della via della seta e la via della seta marittima del XXI secolo”("B&R"). È un'iniziativa di costruzione congiunta di un corridoio economico lungo il percorso dell'antica "via della seta" con i paesi su di esso.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Papers June 2009
    49513 THE WORLD BANK GROUP WASHINGTON, D.C. TP-24 TRANSPORT PAPERS JUNE 2009 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized PRIVATE PARTICIPATION IN THE TRANSPORT SECTOR Lessons from Recent Experience in Europe and Central Asia V. Cuttaree, M. Humphreys, S. Muzira, and J-P Strand Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized TRANSPORT SECTOR BOARD PRIVATE PARTICIPATION IN THE TRANSPORT SECTOR Lessons from Recent Experience in Europe and Central Asia V. Cuttaree, M. Humphreys, S. Muzira, and J-P Strand THE WORLD BANK WASHINGTON, D.C. 2009 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This volume is a product of the staff of The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 18.06.2020
    DAILY REPORT 18.06.2020. DAILY REPORT 18.06.2020. Reporting time: 08.00 h S ERBIA HORGOŠ: • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 3-4 hours, 45 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 4-5 hours, 1.5 km long waiting line. The borderzone is full KELEBIA • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 1-2 hours, 20 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 2-3 hours, 1 km long waiting line. TOVARNIK-ŠID • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 30 minutes, 10 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 1 hours, 10 trucks in the waiting line. BATROVCI • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 3-4 hours, 45 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 1-2 hours, 20 trucks in the waiting line. PREŠEVO BORDER CROSSING • Entry to Serbia: no delays. • Exit from Serbia: no delays. GRADINA • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 2-3 hours, 35 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: no delays. VATIN • Entry to Serbia: no delays. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 50 minutes, 6 trucks in the waiting line. As of June 1, Serbia has fully opened its borders with BiH, Montenegro, Albania, North Macedonia, and Bulgaria. DAILY REPORT 18.06.2020. B OSN I A AND HERZEGO VINA Gradiška: • 50 freight vehicles waiting on BiH exit. There is an increased number of passenger vehicles. • Increased number of vehicles on BiH entry, waiting time 2 hour, a lot of passenger vehicles waiting. • jams at the customs terminal Gardiška. Rača: • No vehicles on BIH entry and no delays.
    [Show full text]
  • Rijeka-Zagreb Motorway Construction Starts At
    HRVATSKA UDRUGA KONCESIONARA ZA AUTOCESTE S NAPLATOM CESTARINE CROATIAN ASSOCIATION OF TOLL MOTORWAYS CONCESSIONAIRES Bilten 7. / 2006 RIJEKA-ZAGREB MOTORWAY Financing agreement between the Autocesta Rijeka - Zagreb d.d. and the European Investment Bank and loan agreement between the Re- public of Croatian and the European Investment Bank On March 9, 2006 the Autocesta Rijeka on and Development (EBRD), according to - Zagreb d.d. (ARZ) and the European Inves- which both Banks participated, each with 50 tment Bank (EIB) signed the financing agree- percent, in the amount required for finan- ment amounting to € 210 million, destined cing the Stage I of this project. for financing the stage IIB of the Rijeka - Za- The Stage IIB, i.e. completion of the Ri- greb motorway, i.e. road widening to full mo- jeka - Zagreb motorway by adding the se- The financing agreement concluded torway profile in the length of 44.26 km from cond pavement on the remaining 44.26 between the European Investment Bank Kikovica to Stara Sušica (Vrbovsko) viaduct. km of the semi-motorway, has been divi- and the Autocesta Rijeka - Zagreb d.d. This € 210 million loan, backed by the gu- ded based on time schedule into 5 secti- was signed by the ARZ Board President arantee issued by the Republic of Croatia, is ons. Individual contracts will be concluded Mr. Jurica Prskalo and the EIB Vice-Pre- to be reimbursed within 25 years, while the for the construction of each such section, sident, Mr. Wolfgang Roth, while the gu- grace period is 5 years. The interest rate is while a separate contract will be conclu- arantee agreement entered into between EURIBOR rate + up to 0.13 percent, with ded for the road and tunnel equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Safe Side
    Annual Report 2019 ON THE SAFE SIDE. Annual Report 2019 Annual Report 2019 ON THE SAFE SIDE. STRABAG is a European-based technology group for construction services, a leader in innovation and financial strength. Our services span all areas of the construction industry and cover the entire construction value chain. We bring together people, materials and machinery at the right place and at the right time in order to realise even complex construction projects – on schedule, of the Annual Report 2019 highest quality and at the best price. KEY FIGURES KEY FINANCIAL FIGURES 2015 2016 2017 2018 ∆ % 2019 Output volume (€ mln.) 14,289.76 13,491.03 14,620.89 16,322.88 2 16,617.97 Revenue (€ mln.) 13,123.48 12,400.46 13,508.72 15,221.83 3 15,668.57 Order backlog (€ mln.) 13,134.58 14,815.79 16,591.87 16,899.71 3 17,411.48 Employees (FTE) 73,315 71,839 72,904 75,460 2 76,919 KEY EARNINGS FIGURES 2015 2016 2017 2018 ∆ % 2019 EBITDA (€ mln.) 816.10 855.18 834.58 952.60 17 1,113.30 EBITDA margin (% of revenue) 6.2 6.9 6.2 6.3 7.1 EBIT (€ mln.) 341.04 424.91 448.36 558.21 8 602.58 EBIT adjusted (€ mln.)1 397.10 502.90 EBIT margin (% of revenue) 2.6 3.4 3.3 3.7 3.8 EBIT margin adjusted (% of revenue)1 3.2 3.3 EBT (€ mln.) 316.62 421.13 421.21 530.78 9 577.24 Net income (€ mln.) 182.49 282.00 292.36 362.78 4 378.56 Net income after minorities (€ mln.) 156.29 277.65 278.91 353.53 5 371.70 Net income after minorities margin (% of revenue) 1.2 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.4 Earnings per share (€) 1.52 2.71 2.72 3.45 5 3.62 Cash flow from operating activities (€ mln.)2 1,240.35
    [Show full text]
  • European Public-Private Partnership Transport Market September 2017 European Public-Private Partnership Transport Market
    European Public-Private Partnership transport market September 2017 European Public-Private Partnership transport market Directors Javier Parada Partner in charge of the Infrastructure Industry, Spain Miguel Laserna Directing Partner of Financial Advisory- Infrastructures Coordinated by Karolina Anna Mlodzik Kate McCarthy Published by Deloitte University EMEA CVBA Contact Infrastructure Department Deloitte Madrid Torre Picasso - Plaza Pablo Ruiz Picasso 1, 28020 Madrid, Spain +34 91514 5000 www.deloitte.es September 2017 2 September 2017 Contents INTRODUCTION 5 1. OVERVIEW 1.1. The transport infrastructure gap 6 1.2. 2016 European PPP transport market 9 1.2.1.European greenfield PPP transactions that reached financial close in 2016 9 1.2.2. European greenfield PPP transport projects with a preferred proponent announced in 2016 14 1.2.3. European greenfield PPP transport projects with a pre-qualified or shortlisted proponent in 2016 16 1.2.4. European PPP transport refinancings in 2016 16 1.2.5. European PPP transport M&A transactions in 2016 19 1.3. Conclusions 22 2. THE MAIN PLAYERS 2.1. Top 35 ranking 24 2.2. Main players’ current strategy 25 Main players’ role in the infrastructure lifecycle 25 Sponsors 26 Operators 27 Institutional investors 27 3. CONTEXT FOR EUROPEAN PPPS 3.1. Policy and regulation trends 30 3.1.1. Regulatory changes: Directives 2014/23/UE, 2014/24/UE and 2014/25/UE 30 3.2. Funding and financing trends 32 3.2.1. An investment plan for Europe: the Juncker Plan 33 3.2.2. Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative 39 4. EUROPEAN GREENFIELD PPP TRANSPORT PIPELINE 4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 05.05.2020
    DAILY REPORT 05.05.2020. DAILY REPORT 05.05.2020. Reporting time: 13.30 h S ERBIA HORGOŠ: • Entry to Serbia; waiting time 40 minutes, 4-5 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 1-2 hours, 1 km long waiting line. KELEBIA • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 30 minutes, 3 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 2-3 hours, 30 trucks in the waiting line. TOVARNIK-ŠID • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 10 minutes (1 truck). • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 50 minutes, 7 trucks in the waiting line. • On Tovarnik-Šid border crossing, the goods coming from Croatia can enter only if export customs clearance was done in Croatia. The goods going to Croatia for unloading should undergo customs clearance in Croatia. BATROVCI • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 40 minutes, 4 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 4-5 hours, 4 km long waiting line. PREŠEVO BORDER CROSSING • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 50 minutes, 5 trucks in the waiting line • Exit from Serbia: no delays. GRADINA • Entry to Serbia: no delays. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 40 minutes, 5-6 trucks in the waiting line. VATIN • Entry to Serbia: waiting time 20 minutes, 2 trucks in the waiting line. • Exit from Serbia: waiting time 40 minutes, 4-5 trucks in the waiting line. As of April 6th, there will be no transit traffic towards Romania through border crossings Srpska Crnja and Đerdap. The trucks from Serbia that are transiting through Romania can use Vatin border crossing.
    [Show full text]