Federalism and Decentralization in Germany
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Coordinating Immigrant Integration in Germany Mainstreaming at the Federal and Local Levels
coordinating immigrant integration in germany mainstreaming at the federal and local levels By Petra Bendel MIGRATION POLICY INSTITUTE EUROPE Coordinating immigrant integration in Germany Mainstreaming at the federal and local levels By Petra Bendel August 2014 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author is particularly grateful for the assistance of Sabine Klotz and Christine Scharf in research and useful critiques. She would also like to thank all her interview partners in the different ministeries and agencies at the federal and state levels as well as local administrations for their frankness and for providing useful material on ‘best practices’. This report, part of a research project supported by the Kingdom of the Netherlands, is one of four country reports on mainstreaming: Denmark, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. MPI Europe thanks key partners in this research project, Peter Scholten from Erasmus University and Ben Gidley from Compas, Oxford University. © 2014 Migration Policy Institute Europe. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from MPI Europe. A full-text PDF of this document is available for free download from www.mpieurope.org. Information for reproducing excerpts from this report can be found at www.migrationpolicy.org/about/copyright-policy. Inquiries can also be directed to [email protected]. Suggested citation: Bendel, Petra. 2014. Coordinating immigrant integration in Germany: Mainstreaming at the federal and local levels. Brussels: Migration Policy Institute Europe. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................1 I. INTRODUCTION: THE CONTEXT OF IMMIGRATION AND INTEGRATION IN GERMANY ...........................................2 II. -
CLIP-IN: Climate Policy Integration in Federal States: Adaptation, Mitigation and Sustainable Development in Austria, Germany and Switzerland
CLIP-IN: Climate Policy Integration in Federal States: Adaptation, Mitigation and Sustainable Development in Austria, Germany and Switzerland Analytical Framework by Juan Casado-Asensio & Reinhard Steurer with support from Klaus Jacob & Stefanie Korte This project is funded by the Austrian Climate and Energy Fund within the framework of the ACRP programme 1 Contents CLIMATE POLICY INTEGRATION IN FEDERAL STATES: ....................................................................................... 1 ADAPTATION, MITIGATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN AUSTRIA, GERMANY AND SWITZERLAND ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1. TOPIC AND CONTEXT .................................................................................................................................... 3 2. POLICY INTEGRATION AND FEDERALISM.................................................................................................. 5 2.1. INTEGRATED STRATEGIES AND CLIMATE POLICY INTEGRATION ..................................................................................... 5 2.2. FEDERALISM AND ITS NET EFFECT ON CLIMATE POLICY INTEGRATION ............................................................................ 7 2.3. FEDERALISM AND MULTI-LEVEL-GOVERNANCE ....................................................................................................... 10 3. FRAMEWORK FOR CASE STUDIES .............................................................................................................. -
Grundstücksmarktbericht 2020
Der Gutachterausschuss für Grundstückswerte im Kreis Siegen-Wittgenstein Grundstücksmarktbericht 2020 für die Städte Bad Berleburg, Bad Laasphe, Freudenberg, Hilchenbach, Kreuztal, Netphen, und die Gemeinden Burbach, Erndtebrück, Neunkirchen, Wilnsdorf www.boris.nrw.de Der Gutachterausschuss für Grundstückswerte im Kreis Siegen-Wittgenstein Grundstücksmarktbericht 2020 Berichtszeitraum 01.01.2019 – 31.12.2019 Übersicht über den Grundstücksmarkt im Kreis Siegen-Wittgenstein (ohne den Bereich der Stadt Siegen) Herausgeber Der Gutachterausschuss für Grundstückswerte im Kreis Siegen-Wittgenstein Geschäftsstelle Koblenzer Straße 73 57072 Siegen Telefon: 0271/333-1551 oder -1550 Fax: 0271/333 29 1551 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.boris.nrw.de Druck Druckerei der Kreisverwaltung Siegen-Wittgenstein Gebühr Das Dokument kann unter www.boris.nrw.de gebührenfrei heruntergeladen werden. Bei einer Bereitstellung des Dokuments oder eines gedruckten Exemplars durch die Geschäftsstelle des Gutachterausschusses be- trägt die Gebühr 23 EUR je Exemplar (Nr. 5.3.22 des Kostentarifs der Kostenordnung für das amtliche Ver- messungswesen und die amtliche Grundstückswertermittlung in Nordrhein-Westfalen) Bildnachweis Die Fotos auf dem Titelblatt wurden vom Touristikverband Siegerland - Wittgenstein e.V. mit freundlicher Genehmigung der jeweiligen Städte und Gemeinden zur Verfügung gestellt. Lizenz Für den Grundstücksmarktbericht gilt die Lizenz "Datenlizenz Deutschland - Zero - Version 2.0" (dl-de/zero-2- 0). Jede Nutzung ist -
Policy 11.Qxd.Qxd
GERMANY’S ELECTORAL SYSTEM AT 60: TRENDS AND REFORMS FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY AICGS GERMAN-AMERICAN ISSUES 11 Karen Donfried Olaf Gersemann Beate Jochimsen Jörg Siegmund AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CONTEMPORARY GERMAN STUDIES THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword 3 About the Authors 5 The American Institute for Contemporary German Studies strengthens the German-American relation - The Decline of the Volksparteien 7 ship in an evolving Europe and changing world. The Institute produces objective and original analyses of Economic Challenges for the New German Government 19 developments and trends in Germany, Europe, and the United States; creates new transatlantic networks; and facilitates dialogue among the busi - The German Fiscal Federal System 27 ness, political, and academic communities to manage differences and define and promote common inter - U.S. Expectations of Germany after the Election 37 ests. ©2009 by the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies ISBN 1-933942-22-3 ADDITIONAL COPIES: Additional Copies of this Policy Report are available for $5.00 to cover postage and handling from the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20036. Tel: 202/332-9312, Fax 202/265-9531, E-mail: [email protected] Please consult our website for a list of online publications: http://www.aicgs.org The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies. germany’s electoral system at 60 FOREWORD When Germany elected a new government on 27 September 2009, it did so not with an eye to the party, economic, or political successes of the previous sixty years. -
Federalism in Germany, Italy, and the European Union: History, Characteristics, and Perspectives
Journal for Markets and Ethics/Zeitschrift für Marktwirtschaft und Ethik • 6(1) • 2018 DOI: 10.2478/jome-2018-0034 Journal for Markets and Ethics/Zeitschrift für Marktwirtschaft und Ethik Federalism in Germany, Italy, and the European Union: History, Characteristics, and Perspectives Beate Jochimsen* Berlin School of Economics and Law (HWR), German Institute for Economic Research (DIW), Berlin, Germany Received January 30 2018; Accepted February 18 2018 Abstract: Federalism is always torn between the principles of subsidiarity and solidarity. Defining the federal structure of a country by finding the welfare-maximizing amount and design of government layers is challenging. Thereby, the financial endowment of different layers of government which they need to fulfill their respective tasks is an important aspect. European countries have chosen quite different federal designs to address the question of an optimal degree of fiscal decentralization. The aim of this paper is to analyze these different approaches for Germany, Italy, and the European Union. Parallels can be found in that all the three entities share a form of institutional asymmetry, a kind of fiscal bailout system, and a sort of fiscal equalization scheme. Keywords: Federalism • Germany • Italy • Europe JEL-Classification: H77 • P51 • O52 • N43 European countries have chosen quite different 1. Introduction federal designs to address the question of an optimal Identifying the sources of individual well-being has degree of fiscal decentralization. Germany, Italy, and been a major challenge in social sciences for many the European Union (EU), for example, are all struc- years. To what extent federal institutions support life tured more or less in a federal, i.e., decentral, way. -
Power Lines As Lifelines
POWER LINES AS LIFELINES BIOTOPE MANAGEMENT AT AMPRION THE AMPRION GRID Amprion’s transmission grid has a length of about 11,000 kilo- metres. More than 29 million people from Lower Saxony to the Alps are supplied with reliable electricity via our grid – day in, day out. Overhead power line Substation Lower Saxony Netherlands THE AMPRION GRID North Rhine- Westphalia Amprion’s transmission grid DORTMUND has a length of about 11,000 kilo- metres. More than 29 million COLOGNE people from Lower Saxony to the Hesse Alps are supplied with reliable Belgium < electricity via our grid – day in, FRANKFURT AM MAIN day out. Amprion – a brief profile Bavaria Rhineland- Luxembourg Palatinate Saarland SAARBRÜCKEN Baden- Württemberg STUTTGART France AUGSBURG Switzerland Austria Overhead power line CONTENTS Substation Lower Saxony Netherlands North02 Rhine- Amprion’sWestphalia responsibilities DORTMUND 03 Habitats underneath power lines COLOGNE 08 From mapping toHesse maintenance measures Belgium 14 < Power line route maintenanceFRANKFURT AM MAIN – an opportunity for nature conservation Amprion – a brief profile Bavaria Rhineland- Luxembourg Palatinate 22 Glossary Saarland 24 SAARBRÜCKEN Publication details Baden- Württemberg STUTTGART France AUGSBURG Switzerland Austria Long stretches of our power lines pass through open landscapes, forests and meadows. They are the backbone of the power supply system but also a habitat for countless species of animals and plants. In order to ensure the re liable and safe transmission of electricity, we pay special attention to the vege tation to be found underneath our over head lines – be cause trees and shrubs must not be allowed to grow too close to the lines. 2 BIOTOPE MANAGEMENT Amprion’s responsibilities Amprion GmbH runs Germany’s longest transmission network, which stretches over a distance of 11,000 kilometres. -
VGWS Tarifinfo Kompakt
www.westfalentarif.de www.vgws.de Tarifi nfo Kompakt Alles Wissenwerte rund um 2018 TARIFE für Bus & Bahn Stand: 08/2018 Impressum Herausgeber VGWS Verkehrsgemeinschaft Westfalen-Süd Spandauer Straße 36, 57072 Siegen [email protected], www.vgws.de ZWS Zweckverband Personennahverkehr Westfalen-Süd Postanschrift: Koblenzer Straße 73, 57072 Siegen Besucheranschrift: St.-Johann-Straße 18, 57074 Siegen ZWSINFOLINE (01806) 50 40 30 (0,20 EUR/Anruf aus dem Festnetz, Mobilfunk max. 0,60 EUR/Anruf) montags – freitags von 6.00 bis 20.00 Uhr (außerhalb dieser Zeiten sprechender Fahrplan) [email protected], www.zws-online.de Konzept/Layout/Satz LUP AG • Medienproduktion Filzengraben 15–17, 50676 Köln [email protected], www.lup-ag.de Stand 08/2018 Alle Daten wurden sorgfältig recherchiert. Alle Angaben ohne Gewähr! Für Kritik und Anregungen steht Ihnen die Redaktion gerne zur Verfügung. Bildnachweise: ©NWL, ©Stadt Bad Berleburg, ©Klaus Neuser, ©Andrew Harris/Syniad Photography, ©Gemeinde Erndtebrück, ©Rosel Eckstein, ©Stadt Hilchenbach, ©Gemeinde Kirchhundem, ©Tourist-Information Lennestadt & Kirchhundem, ©Stadt Netphen, ©Stadtmarketingverein Olpe Aktiv e.V., ©Universitätsstadt Siegen, ©Gemeindearchiv Wenden, ©Heike Dreisbach Liebe Fahrgäste, auch mit Einführung des WestfalenTarifs bleibt Bus- und Bahnfahren in Westfalen-Süd, in den Kreisen Olpe und Siegen-Wittgenstein, einfach. Dank des Gemeinschaftstarifs können Sie jetzt mit nur einem Ticket die Busse und Bahnen im gesamten Verkehrsraum Westfalen nutzen. Sogar wenn Sie aus Westfalen-Süd in die Regionen Ruhr-Lippe (z.B. Lüdenscheid, Hagen, Dortmund), Münsterland (z.B. Münster), TeutoOWL (z.B. Bielefeld) und Hochstift (z.B. Paderborn) fahren, benötigen Sie nur einen Fahrschein und sind immer bequem und günstig unterwegs. Sie möchten Ihren Fahrpreis selbst ermitteln? Kein Problem – der WestfalenTarif macht es möglich! Die aktuellen Tarifgebiete sowie eine Auflistung von Verbesserungen und Anpassungenwerden zunächst für die einzelnen Städte und Gemeinden in alphabetischer Reihenfolge dargestellt. -
Qt00s4m9hv.Pdf
UC Berkeley Working Papers Title Federalism and public policy : a comparative view Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/00s4m9hv Author Baldi, Brunetta Publication Date 1997 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California AiM6^ Federalism and Public Policy: AComparative View BrunettaBaldt University of Bologna Working Paper 97-2 lIlSTlTuTE OP GOVERHMEMTAl STyOlES U&BARlf 9 199T UNIVERSITY QF CALIFORNIA IGS INSTITUTE OF GOVERNMENTAL STUDIES m UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY Federalism and Public Policy: AComparative View Brunetta Baldl University of Bologna Working Roper 97-2 Workino Papers published by the Institute of Governmental Studies provide quick dissemination of draft reports and papers, preliminary analysis, and papers with alimited audience. The obiective is to assist authors in refining their ideas hy circulating research results and to stimulate discussion about public policy. Workino Papers are reproduced unedited directly from the author's pages. Federalism and public policy: a comparative view by Brunetta Baldi University ofBologna Working paper Institute ofGovernmental Studies University ofCalifornia, Berkeley June 1997 1. Federalism and public policy The relationship between federalism and public policy in contemporary federal systems is, on the one hand, very complex and multiform to be comprehensively analyzed and, on the other, often "forgotten" by public policy analysis. The two are connected: federalism is given a contextual role within policy models because it is perceived -
Between Reformstau and Modernisierung: the Reform Of
Between Reformstau and Modernisierung: The Reform of German Federalism since Unification Gunther M. Hega Department of Political Science Western Michigan University 1903 W. Michigan Avenue Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5346 E-mail: [email protected] 1. Draft -- October 22, 2003 Please do not quote without the author’s permission Paper to be presented at the Conference on “Europeanization and Integration” EU Center of the University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, October 24 – 25, 2003 Abstract: Between Reformstau and Modernisierung: The Reform of German Federalism since Unification This paper examines the changes of the German federal system and the role of the 16 states (Länder) in national politics and policy-making in the Federal Republic of Germany since 1990. In particular, the study focuses on the response of the German Federal Council (Bundesrat), the chamber of the national parliament which represents the Länder, to the processes of German unification and European integration in the last decade. The paper starts from the assumption that the Federal Council has been the chief beneficiary among the Federal Republic's political institutions of the trends toward "unitary federalism" at the domestic level and a "federal Europe" at the international level. Due to the evolution of cooperative federalism with its interlocking policies, the changes in the party system and coalition politics, and, in particular, the twin processes of German unification and European integration, the Bundesrat has gained additional, special powers by assuring the inclusion of the "subsidiarity principle" in both the German Constitution (the Basic Law) and the Maastricht Treaty on European Union. The amended Article 23 of the Basic Law and the Maastricht Treaty's Article 3b strengthen the participation of the Federal Council and the 16 German states in national and European policymaking. -
Constitutional Politics in East Germany and the Grand Coalition State by Werner Reutter
ISSN: 2036-5438 Constitutional Politics in East Germany and the Grand Coalition State by Werner Reutter Perspectives on Federalism, Vol. 8, issue 3, 2016 Except where otherwise noted content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.5 Italy License E - 23 Abstract Constitutional politics seemingly corroborate the assumption that Germany is a Grand Coalition state. In this perspective German cooperative federalism and the supermajority required for any amendment to the constitution privilege bargaining and intertwined policy-making as modes of conflict resolution and thus support grand coalitions. In this paper I will explore whether this theory can explain constitutional politics in the German Länder. Firstly, I examine how far sub-national constitutional politics match the functioning of cooperative federalism that is a defining feature of the Grand Coalition state. Secondly, I examine sub-national constitutional politics in the five new Länder and bring the role parties played in this policy field to the fore. Overall, I conclude that cooperative federalism did not impact on constitutional politics in East Germany and that the features of consensus democracy are only partly able to explain law-making in this sector. Key-words Land constitutions, German federalism, Grand Coalition state, consensus democracy, majoritarian democracy Except where otherwise noted content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.5 Italy License E - 24 Apparently, constitutional politics corroborate the hypothesis that Germany is a Grand Coalition state or a ‘state which embodies high ‘“dispersal of power”’ and thus privileges bargaining and compromise as modes of conflict resolution (Schmidt 2008: 79; cf. -
ENTWURF ENTWURF Regionalplan Arnsberg – Festlegungen Und Erläuterungen | Räumlicher Teilplan MK – OE – SI
RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEIL- PLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUM- LICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEIL- PLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUM- LICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEIL- PLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUM- LICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN ALTENA BALVE HALVER HEMER HERSCHEID SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER ISERLOHN KIERSPE LÜDENSCHEID MEINERZ- TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK RÄUMLICHER TEILPLAN SO/HSK HAGEN MENDEN NACHRODT-WIBLINGWERDE -
Überblick in Zahlen 2020
18.677 7.156 7.262 23.623 49.750 27.487 133.955 3.442 1.317 1.290 4.338 9.071 4.806 24.264 1.673 6.31 617 2.110 4.436 2.316 Attendor11.783n Burbach 2.457 9.49 950 3.056 6.251 3.292 Olpe 16.955 1.507 6.19 698 1.943 4.367 2.351 Kreuztal11.485 Freudenberg 3.431 1.307 1.326 4.446 9.321 5.477 Drolshagen25.308 3.313 1.291 1.278 4.344 8.831 5.494 Kreis Olpe24.551 Siegen 2.854 1.042 1.103 3.386 7.473 3.751 IHK Siegen19.609 37.551 13.518 17.827 51.669 96.055 60.324 Kreis276.944 Sieg.-Wittg. Wilnsdorf 2.488 943 929 3.042 7.122 4.390 Netphe18.914n 2.163 777 864 2.818 5.207 3.027 Finnentr14.856op Neunkirchen 891 309 366 1.215 2.552 1.601 Lennesta6.934dt Bad Berleburg 2.415 895 892 3.039 6.587 3.883 Hilchenbac17.711h 1.923 798 732 2.523 5.335 3.490 Erndtebrüc14.801k Kirchhundem 4.674 1.582 1.707 5.588 10.793 6.778 Bad Laasph31.122e 1.743 691 726 2.225 4.967 3.152 13.504 3.161 1.057 1.194 4.191 8.450 5.028 23.081 1.774 645 734 2.215 4.703 3.094 13.165 13.601 4.856 8.669 2.1421 33.066 2.1157 102.770 2.718 965 1.014 3.392 7.273 4.724 20.086 56.228 INDUSTRIE20.674 -25.089 UND HANDELSKAMMER75.292 145.805 SIEGEN87.811 410.899 Überblick in Zahlen 2020 Siegen Überblick in Zahlen_v7.indd 1 23.02.21 08:42 Seite | 2 Vorwort VORWORT Der IHK-Bezirk Siegen, bestehend aus den beiden Kreisen Olpe und Siegen-Wittgenstein, ist eine erfolgreiche und starke Wirtschafts- region in Südwestfalen.