A View from the Lander: the Evolution of German Federalism in Historical and Comparative Perspective

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A View from the Lander: the Evolution of German Federalism in Historical and Comparative Perspective A VIEW FROM THE LANDER: THE EVOLUTION OF GERMAN FEDERALISM IN HISTORICAL AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE A Thesis· -_ - Presented to the Faculty of the Institute for Regional Analysis and Public Policy Morehead State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Public Administration by Erik Weber April 24, 2009 Accepted by the facu lty of the Institute for Regional Analysis and Public Policy, Morehead State University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Public Administration degree. Date A VIEW FROM 1HE LANDER: 1HE EVOLUTION OF GERMAN FEDERALISM IN A 1-IlSTORICALAND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE Erik S. Weber, M.P.A. Morehead State University, 2009 Director of Thesis: _;a__ +~"""---'----1,'---W __ ._ C€.f..,.'--='-J},_~~..:,j--/-4 Though it has foundations in many of the same political theoretical writings, German foderalismus has never quite meant the same thing nor functioned in the same way as American federalism. As a result, the German political system has generally been much more unitary than its American counterpart despite both being termed federations. This was especially true in the post-war reconstructed German Federal Republic. Unlike the American system at the same time, the German Federation remained mostly unchanged throughout the 50s, 60s, and 70s. With the fall of the Berlin Wall in I 989 and the subsequent German reunification, though, the country's federal system has been placed under a variety of stresses, which have exacted a toll on the classical German unitary federalism. This thesis seeks to examine the historical evolution of federalism in the German nation, concentrating primarily on the time from the formation of the Federal German Republic through reunification and into pres~nt day. This assessment will concentrate on the tangible effects of institutional reform (and sometimes non-reform) on federal intergovernmental relations, especially from the perspective of the Lander, or states. Several recent attempts, both successful and unsuccessful, at constitutional reform will be considered in light of public policy formulation models especially the multiple streams frameworks. Along the way, comparisons will be drawn to America's own federal system and its evolution through the history of the United States. Assessing these similarities and differences, the thesis closes by drawing some conclusions as to the current state and future direction of the German federal system as we near the twentieth anniversary ofreunification. German federalism, it seems, has been a pragmatic outcome of cultural and historical regionalism applied to political realities throughout history. Evolutions in the German federal design have come on the heels of enormous institutional changes as a result of wars or major regime changes. This did not happen following the German reunification, which has resulted in a stagnation of federal evolution which poses major challenges to the Federal German Republic as it celebrates sixty years of existence. Accepted by: Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................... 6 The German Political System ........................................................................................ 7 The Centrality of the Bundesrat.. ............................................................................ 10 The History of German Federalism ............................................................................. I I The Implications of"Federal" History and Historical Regiona!ism ............................ 16 Modern-day German and the Adoption of Cooperative Federalism ............................ 20 Moving from Cooperative to Competitive Federalism ................................................ 28 De facto Federal Reform ......................................................................................... 33 The Possibility of German Federal Reform ................................................................ .35 Recent reform attempts ........................................................................................... 41 Prognosis for the future ........................................................................................... 54 German Federalism in a Europe of the Regions .......................................................... 55 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 58 Appendix A - Glossary of German terms and, where applicable, their American equivalents ................................................................................................................... 62 Bibliography ................................................................................................................ 63 6 Introduction Germany has a long and varied history. Both the American term federalism and its German counterpart Foderalismus are derived from the Latin wordfoedus, meaning alliance or contract.' Despite shared etymology, and even though it has foundations in many of the same political theoretical writings, Germanfoderalismus has never quite meant the same thing as American federalism. As a result, the German political system has generally been considered much more unitary than its American counterpart despite both governments being termed federations. This unitary character of the German system was especially true in the post-war reconstructed German Federal Republic. Unlike the American system at the same time, the German Federation remained mostly unchanged throughout the 1950s, 60s, and 70s. With the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the subsequent German reunification, though, the country's federal system has been placed under a variety of stresses, which have exacted a toll on the preconditions which helped form German unitary federalism in the first place. The result has been an increasing call for reform of the federal system of intergovernmental relations, with some, albeit limited and incremental, success. This thesis seeks to understand the evolution of federalism throughout German history, with a particular emphasis on the past half century. Following a brief Deutscher Bundesrat, "Federalism" [Web site] (Berlin: Deutscher Bundesrat); available from <http://www.bundesrat.de/nn_ 11004/EN/funktionen-en/inhalte/1-Foederalismus-en.html>; accessed 7 April 2009. 7 introduction of the German political system, I will undertake a historical review of development ofGermanfoderalismus, culminating in an assessment of recent reforms ( or attempted reforms, as the case may be) within several major public policy and intergovernmental frameworks, offering finally a prognosis for the future of federal reform as Germany moves further into a federalized Europe. Throughout the thesis, where relevant, comparisons will be drawn to similar and contrasting theories and events in the American federal experience. The German Political System To gain an understanding of the complex German federal system and make any meaningful comparisons of German and American intergovernmental relations, it is first important to have at least a rudimentary understanding of the most important German political institutions, especially vis-a-vis their American counterparts. Germany's government is characterized as a federal parliamentary republican form of government. The Bundesrepublik Deutsch/and, or Federal Republic of Germany embodies many of the same Montesquieuian ideas of the separation of powers that are seen in the American government, with both horizontal and vertical separation of governing powers. At the federal or Bund level power is divided, much like in the U.S., between the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government. The executive branch consists of the Bundesprasident, or Federal President, who is the primarily ceremonial head of state, elected every five years by 8 the Federal Assembly made up of the Bundestag and state delegates representing the legislatures of the various Lander. The head of government and chief executive is the Bundeskanzler ( or in the current case ofAngela Merkel, the Bundeskanzlerin) or Federal Chancellor and is chosen by Bundestag from among its elected members, much like the prime minister of England. As a parliamentary system, the German legislative branch is made up of two houses, the Bundestag, or Federal Diet, and the Bundesrat, or Federal Council, which are elected differently and provide different representation than the American houses of Congress. While Bundestag is considered a parliament, the method of electing its deputies is classified as a mixed member proportional representation system, attempting to combine the benefits of the straightforward proportional representation system with the those of a first-past-the-post, district-based representation system like in the United States. Approximately half of the deputies are elected by and represent a specific district. Separately, all political parties which receive more than five percent of the national vote are entitled to seat deputies in the Bundestag. After the single-seat constituencies are elected, parties are assigned_ a number of open seats so that when added to the constituency seats wqn in district elections, the total number of seats each party has matches the proportion of the national vote they received. 2 There are 299 single-seat constituencies which ideally make up half of the Bundestag's minimum 498 seats. Because some parties
Recommended publications
  • CLIP-IN: Climate Policy Integration in Federal States: Adaptation, Mitigation and Sustainable Development in Austria, Germany and Switzerland
    CLIP-IN: Climate Policy Integration in Federal States: Adaptation, Mitigation and Sustainable Development in Austria, Germany and Switzerland Analytical Framework by Juan Casado-Asensio & Reinhard Steurer with support from Klaus Jacob & Stefanie Korte This project is funded by the Austrian Climate and Energy Fund within the framework of the ACRP programme 1 Contents CLIMATE POLICY INTEGRATION IN FEDERAL STATES: ....................................................................................... 1 ADAPTATION, MITIGATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN AUSTRIA, GERMANY AND SWITZERLAND ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1. TOPIC AND CONTEXT .................................................................................................................................... 3 2. POLICY INTEGRATION AND FEDERALISM.................................................................................................. 5 2.1. INTEGRATED STRATEGIES AND CLIMATE POLICY INTEGRATION ..................................................................................... 5 2.2. FEDERALISM AND ITS NET EFFECT ON CLIMATE POLICY INTEGRATION ............................................................................ 7 2.3. FEDERALISM AND MULTI-LEVEL-GOVERNANCE ....................................................................................................... 10 3. FRAMEWORK FOR CASE STUDIES ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Policy 11.Qxd.Qxd
    GERMANY’S ELECTORAL SYSTEM AT 60: TRENDS AND REFORMS FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY AICGS GERMAN-AMERICAN ISSUES 11 Karen Donfried Olaf Gersemann Beate Jochimsen Jörg Siegmund AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CONTEMPORARY GERMAN STUDIES THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword 3 About the Authors 5 The American Institute for Contemporary German Studies strengthens the German-American relation - The Decline of the Volksparteien 7 ship in an evolving Europe and changing world. The Institute produces objective and original analyses of Economic Challenges for the New German Government 19 developments and trends in Germany, Europe, and the United States; creates new transatlantic networks; and facilitates dialogue among the busi - The German Fiscal Federal System 27 ness, political, and academic communities to manage differences and define and promote common inter - U.S. Expectations of Germany after the Election 37 ests. ©2009 by the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies ISBN 1-933942-22-3 ADDITIONAL COPIES: Additional Copies of this Policy Report are available for $5.00 to cover postage and handling from the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20036. Tel: 202/332-9312, Fax 202/265-9531, E-mail: [email protected] Please consult our website for a list of online publications: http://www.aicgs.org The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies. germany’s electoral system at 60 FOREWORD When Germany elected a new government on 27 September 2009, it did so not with an eye to the party, economic, or political successes of the previous sixty years.
    [Show full text]
  • Federalism in Germany, Italy, and the European Union: History, Characteristics, and Perspectives
    Journal for Markets and Ethics/Zeitschrift für Marktwirtschaft und Ethik • 6(1) • 2018 DOI: 10.2478/jome-2018-0034 Journal for Markets and Ethics/Zeitschrift für Marktwirtschaft und Ethik Federalism in Germany, Italy, and the European Union: History, Characteristics, and Perspectives Beate Jochimsen* Berlin School of Economics and Law (HWR), German Institute for Economic Research (DIW), Berlin, Germany Received January 30 2018; Accepted February 18 2018 Abstract: Federalism is always torn between the principles of subsidiarity and solidarity. Defining the federal structure of a country by finding the welfare-maximizing amount and design of government layers is challenging. Thereby, the financial endowment of different layers of government which they need to fulfill their respective tasks is an important aspect. European countries have chosen quite different federal designs to address the question of an optimal degree of fiscal decentralization. The aim of this paper is to analyze these different approaches for Germany, Italy, and the European Union. Parallels can be found in that all the three entities share a form of institutional asymmetry, a kind of fiscal bailout system, and a sort of fiscal equalization scheme. Keywords: Federalism • Germany • Italy • Europe JEL-Classification: H77 • P51 • O52 • N43 European countries have chosen quite different 1. Introduction federal designs to address the question of an optimal Identifying the sources of individual well-being has degree of fiscal decentralization. Germany, Italy, and been a major challenge in social sciences for many the European Union (EU), for example, are all struc- years. To what extent federal institutions support life tured more or less in a federal, i.e., decentral, way.
    [Show full text]
  • Federalism and Decentralization in Germany
    FEDERALISM AND DECENTRALIZATION IN GERMANY BASIC FEATURES AND PRINCIPLES FOR GERMAN DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION As a federally owned enterprise, GIZ supports the German Government in achieving its objectives in the field of international cooperation for sustainable development. Published by: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Registered offices Bonn and Eschborn Potsdam Center for Policy and Management University of Potsdam August-Bebel-Strasse 89 14482 Potsdam, Germany E [email protected] I www.giz.de Author: Harald Fuhr, Julia Fleischer and Sabine Kuhlmann Design/layout: Diamond media GmbH, Neunkirchen-Seelscheid Photo credits/sources: Shuttertstock.de URL links: This publication contains links to external websites. Responsibility for the content of the listed external sites always lies with their respective publishers. When the links to these sites were first posted, GIZ checked the third-party con- tent to establish whether it could give rise to civil or criminal liability. However, the constant review of the links to external sites cannot reasonably be expected without concrete indication of a violation of rights. If GIZ itself becomes aware or is notified by a third party that an external site it has provided a link to gives rise to civil or criminal liability, it will remove the link to this site immediately. GIZ expressly dissociates itself from such content. On behalf of German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) 401 – Sectoral and thematic policies, governance, democracy and rule of law Bonn GIZ is responsible for the content of this publication. Printed on 100% recycled paper, certified to FSC standards. ©GIZ 2018 BASIC FEATURES AND PRINCIPLES FOR GERMAN DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION 3 FOREWORD GIZ is a federal enterprise in the field of international cooperation for sustainable devel- opment and international education.
    [Show full text]
  • Qt00s4m9hv.Pdf
    UC Berkeley Working Papers Title Federalism and public policy : a comparative view Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/00s4m9hv Author Baldi, Brunetta Publication Date 1997 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California AiM6^ Federalism and Public Policy: AComparative View BrunettaBaldt University of Bologna Working Paper 97-2 lIlSTlTuTE OP GOVERHMEMTAl STyOlES U&BARlf 9 199T UNIVERSITY QF CALIFORNIA IGS INSTITUTE OF GOVERNMENTAL STUDIES m UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY Federalism and Public Policy: AComparative View Brunetta Baldl University of Bologna Working Roper 97-2 Workino Papers published by the Institute of Governmental Studies provide quick dissemination of draft reports and papers, preliminary analysis, and papers with alimited audience. The obiective is to assist authors in refining their ideas hy circulating research results and to stimulate discussion about public policy. Workino Papers are reproduced unedited directly from the author's pages. Federalism and public policy: a comparative view by Brunetta Baldi University ofBologna Working paper Institute ofGovernmental Studies University ofCalifornia, Berkeley June 1997 1. Federalism and public policy The relationship between federalism and public policy in contemporary federal systems is, on the one hand, very complex and multiform to be comprehensively analyzed and, on the other, often "forgotten" by public policy analysis. The two are connected: federalism is given a contextual role within policy models because it is perceived
    [Show full text]
  • Between Reformstau and Modernisierung: the Reform Of
    Between Reformstau and Modernisierung: The Reform of German Federalism since Unification Gunther M. Hega Department of Political Science Western Michigan University 1903 W. Michigan Avenue Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5346 E-mail: [email protected] 1. Draft -- October 22, 2003 Please do not quote without the author’s permission Paper to be presented at the Conference on “Europeanization and Integration” EU Center of the University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, October 24 – 25, 2003 Abstract: Between Reformstau and Modernisierung: The Reform of German Federalism since Unification This paper examines the changes of the German federal system and the role of the 16 states (Länder) in national politics and policy-making in the Federal Republic of Germany since 1990. In particular, the study focuses on the response of the German Federal Council (Bundesrat), the chamber of the national parliament which represents the Länder, to the processes of German unification and European integration in the last decade. The paper starts from the assumption that the Federal Council has been the chief beneficiary among the Federal Republic's political institutions of the trends toward "unitary federalism" at the domestic level and a "federal Europe" at the international level. Due to the evolution of cooperative federalism with its interlocking policies, the changes in the party system and coalition politics, and, in particular, the twin processes of German unification and European integration, the Bundesrat has gained additional, special powers by assuring the inclusion of the "subsidiarity principle" in both the German Constitution (the Basic Law) and the Maastricht Treaty on European Union. The amended Article 23 of the Basic Law and the Maastricht Treaty's Article 3b strengthen the participation of the Federal Council and the 16 German states in national and European policymaking.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Politics in East Germany and the Grand Coalition State by Werner Reutter
    ISSN: 2036-5438 Constitutional Politics in East Germany and the Grand Coalition State by Werner Reutter Perspectives on Federalism, Vol. 8, issue 3, 2016 Except where otherwise noted content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.5 Italy License E - 23 Abstract Constitutional politics seemingly corroborate the assumption that Germany is a Grand Coalition state. In this perspective German cooperative federalism and the supermajority required for any amendment to the constitution privilege bargaining and intertwined policy-making as modes of conflict resolution and thus support grand coalitions. In this paper I will explore whether this theory can explain constitutional politics in the German Länder. Firstly, I examine how far sub-national constitutional politics match the functioning of cooperative federalism that is a defining feature of the Grand Coalition state. Secondly, I examine sub-national constitutional politics in the five new Länder and bring the role parties played in this policy field to the fore. Overall, I conclude that cooperative federalism did not impact on constitutional politics in East Germany and that the features of consensus democracy are only partly able to explain law-making in this sector. Key-words Land constitutions, German federalism, Grand Coalition state, consensus democracy, majoritarian democracy Except where otherwise noted content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.5 Italy License E - 24 Apparently, constitutional politics corroborate the hypothesis that Germany is a Grand Coalition state or a ‘state which embodies high ‘“dispersal of power”’ and thus privileges bargaining and compromise as modes of conflict resolution (Schmidt 2008: 79; cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Federalism in Germany
    Fiscal Federalism in Germany Ronald L. Watts Institute of Intergovernmental Relations Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario Canada Paul Hobson Department of Economics Acadia University Wolfville, Nova Scotia Canada December, 2000 * The major contributions to this project by Gerard Horgan and Jean François Tremblay are acknowledged. TABLE OF CONTENTS A. FEDERALISM IN GERMANY: THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND POLITICAL CONTEXT ........................................................................................................................... 1 1. CONSTITUTIONAL STATUS OF VARIOUS ORDERS OF GOVERNMENT ........................ 2 The Federal and Land Legislatures ......................................................................... 2 The Courts ............................................................................................................... 4 Constitutional Status of the Federal and Land Governments ................................. 4 Local Governments ................................................................................................. 5 2. CONSTITUTIONAL ALLOCATION OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE RESPONSIBILITIES AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS Constitutional Allocation of Revenue ........................................................................ 6 Personal Income Taxes .................................................................................. 6 Corporate Income Taxes ................................................................................ 7 Sales Taxes ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Delegation, Discretion, and Deference: Explaining the Comparative Law of Administrative Review
    Texas A&M University School of Law Texas A&M Law Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 1-2014 Strategic Delegation, Discretion, and Deference: Explaining the Comparative Law of Administrative Review Nuno Garoupa [email protected] Jud Mathews Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Nuno Garoupa & Jud Mathews, Strategic Delegation, Discretion, and Deference: Explaining the Comparative Law of Administrative Review, 62 Am. J. Comp. L. 1 (2014). Available at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/440 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Texas A&M Law Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Texas A&M Law Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NUNO GAROUPA & JUD MATHEWS* Strategic Delegation, Discretion, and Deference: Explaining the Comparative Law of Administrative Reviewt This paper offers a theory to explain cross-national variation in administrative law doctrines and practices. Administrative law re- gimes vary along three primary dimensions: the scope of delegation to agencies, agencies' exercise of discretion,and judicialpractices of def- erence to agencies. Working with a principal-agent framework, we show how cross-nationaldifferences in institutions' capacitiesand the environments they face encourage the adoption of divergent strategies that lead to a variety of distinct, stable, equilibrium outcomes. We ap- ply our model to explain patterns of administrativelaw in the United States, Germany, France, and Commonwealth jurisdictions. I. INTRODUCTION In this Article, we develop a general model to explain cross-na- tional variation in administrative law regimes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Länder and German Federalism Prelims 27/5/03 11:39 Am Page Ii
    GPOLGunlicks cover 21/5/2003 5:22 pm Page 1 Issues in German Politics The Länder This book provides a detailed introduction to how the Länder (the sixteen states of Germany) function not only within the country itself but also within the wider context of European political affairs. Some knowledge of the role of the Länder is and German federalism essential to an understanding of the political system as well as of German federalism. The Länder This book traces the origin of the Länder. It looks at their place in the constitutional order of the country and the political and administrative system. Their organization and administration are fully covered, as is their financing. Parties and elections in the Länder and the controversial roles of parliaments and deputies are also examined. and German Because of their role in the Bundesrat, the second legislative chamber, the Lander are clearly an important part of the national legislative process. They participate in policy-making with regard to the European Union, and have limited influence on Germany's foreign affairs outside of Europe. This is the first English language book that considers the Länder in this depth. federalism Arthur Gunlicks is a professor of political science and chair of the department at the University of Richmond, Virginia Gunlicks Arthur Gunlicks ISBN 0-7190-6533-X 9 780719 065330 prelims 27/5/03 11:39 am Page i The Länder and German federalism prelims 27/5/03 11:39 am Page ii ISSUES IN GERMAN POLITICS Edited by Professor Charlie Jeffery, Institute for German Studies Dr Charles Lees, University of Sussex Issues in German Politics is a major new series on contemporary Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Federalism in Canada and Germany: Overview and Comparison
    Federalism in Canada and Germany: Overview and Comparison Eric P. Polt en, Lawyer and Notary, Toronto, Ontario Peter Glezl, Legal Assistant P o l t e n & A s s o c i a t e s Adelaide Place, DBRS Tower 181 University Avenue, Suite 2200, Toronto, Ontario Canada M5H 3M7 T e l e p hone: +1 416 601 6811 Fax: +1 416 947 0909 E - m a i l : [email protected] W e b - s i t e : www.polten associates.com © Polten & Associates 2014 0 ©Polten & Associates 2014 Disclaimer The information provided in this article is for general information purposes only and does not constitute professional legal advice. The information presented has been compiled by Polten & Associates and, while we do endeavor to keep the information up-to-date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about its completeness, accuracy, or reliability. Nor are we to be held responsible for any omissions from this article. Insofar as this article adverts to provincial rules, it is usually the case that these rules refer specifically to the Province of Ontario where one-third of the population of Canada lives. These rules may vary from those of other provinces. We strongly recommend that you seek professional legal advice from a qualified lawyer to resolve your particular legal problem. 1 ©Polten & Associates 2014 Contents I. Federalism as a State Structure ......................................................................................................... 3 1. Advantages of Federalism ................................................................................................................. 3 2. Legislative Power within a Federal State .......................................................................................... 3 3. Federalism in Canada and in Germany ............................................................................................. 3 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 12 Issue 2 2020
    VOLUME 12 ISSUE 2 2020 ISSN: 2036-5438 VOL. 12, ISSUE 2, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS SPECIAL SYMPOSIUM Jurisdiction and Pluralisms: Judicial Functions and Organisation in Federal Systems Edited by Jens Woelk EDITORIAL The Challenge of Diversity in a Jurisdiction and Pluralisms: Judicial Multinational Federation: The Impact of Functions and Organisation in Federal the Judiciary on Pluralism in Canada Systems FRÉDÉRIC BÉRARD AND JEAN-FRANÇOIS JENS WOELK ED- I-III GAUDREAULT-DESBIENS E-55-77 Judicial Functions and Organisation in ESSAYS Belgium PATRICIA POPELIER E- 78-101 The declinations of regulatory pluralism in the form of the multilevel State and their The Judiciary in Federal Systems in Africa impact on jurisdiction: judicial federalism NICO STEYTLER & ZEMELAK AYELE in the United States. E- 102-134 An (unfinished?) model for a pluralist defence of rights MARIO COMBA E- 1-13 NOTES Jurisdiction and Pluralism: Judicial EU’s Fight Against Climate Change: An Functions and Organization in Federal Example of Leading by Example? Systems. The Case of Germany ROBERTO TALENTI N- 1- 13 DIAN SCHEFOLD E- 14-27 Normative Pluralism in Argentina and its Repercussions on Jurisdiction LAURA MONTANARI E- 28 -54 ISSN: 2036-5438 Jurisdiction and Pluralisms: Judicial Functions and Organisation in Federal Systems by Jens Woelk Perspectives on Federalism, Vol. 12, issue 2, 2020 Except where otherwise noted content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.5 Italy License Ed - I The thematic focus of this issue of Perspectives on Federalism shall analyse phenomena of pluralism in the judiciary of federal systems: ‘Jurisdiction and Pluralisms: Judicial Functions and Organisation in Federal Systems’.I It will focus on the degree to which legal and judicial pluralism is possible within the general legal system of the State.
    [Show full text]