Component Completion Report

Earthquake and Tsunami Emergency Support Project Fisheries Component NAD & Nias Indonesia

August 2009

Submitted by

NETWORK OF AQUACULTURE CENTRES IN ASIA-PACIFIC (NACA)

BANGKOK, THAILAND C O N T E N T S

Page I. Component Information 1 A. Data (to be completed by EMS) 1 B. Component Objectives 1 1. Description 1 2. Goal 2 3. Component Purpose 2 4. Subcomponents 2 C. Implementation Arrangements 3 D. Outputs/Achievements 6 1. Financial Performance 8 2. Outputs 9 II. Component Rating 16 A. Component Factors 16 B. Ratings 22 C. Impact 22 1. Institutional 22 2. Socio-economic 23 3. Socio-economic Survey 2008 & Financial and Economic Analysis of SC1, SC2, SC3 & SC4 24 4. Technological 25 5. Environmental 25 III. Issues 27 IV. Lessons Learnt 27 Assessment, design and planning 27 Implementation procedures 28 Finance and financial management 29 Communications 29 Monitoring, supervision and reporting 30 Policy and institutions 30 ETESP-Fisheries Subcomponents 31 SC1 Community Empowerment 31 SC2 Capture Fisheries 32 SC3 Aquaculture 33 SC4 Infrastructure 34 SC5 Coastal Environment 35 SC6 Institutional Support 36 Community livelihood support initiatives 37 Aquaculture - ALSC & AACC 37 Capture Fisheries – CF-LSC 38 Community based bathymetric mapping (“sonar mapping”) 41 V. Recommendations 42 A. General 42 B. Follow-up Actions 42

ETESP Fisheries Component Completion Report

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB Asian Development Bank

ADR Activity Design Report

BER Bid Evaluation Report

BOQ Bill of Quantities

DCN District Concept Note

DIPA Budget allocation document of GOI

DIU District Implementation Unit

DKP Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan (provincial /district fisheries departments)

EMS Extended Mission to Sumatra (ADB)

ETESP Earthquake and Tsunami Emergency Support Project

FD Community facilitator

GoI Government of Indonesia

IEE Initial Environmental Examination

IOC Incremental Operational Costs

KPPN Kantor Pelayanan Perbendaharaan Negara (Local Provincial Treasury)

LMS ETESP Livelihood Microfinance Services Component

MDF Multi Donor Fund

MAK Mata Anggaran Kegiatan (Government Budgeting Guidelines)

MMAF Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries

MOF Ministry of Finance

NAD Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam

NGO nongovernment organization

PIU Project Implementation Unit (District)

PMO Project Management Office (of EMS in Medan & Banda Aceh - ADB)

PMU Project Management Unit (Banda Aceh)

PNM Pemodalan Nasional Madani

PPK Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen (within Satker BRR)

ii ETESP Fisheries Component Completion Report

BRR Recovery Aceh Nias Database (of ongoing and planned rehabilitation RAND projects)

RKAKL Budget plan of GoI

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS

(average for period 18 March 2008 – 30 June 2009 www.oanda.com)

Currency Unit - Rp. (Indonesian Rupiah)

Rp1.00 = $0.00011

$1.00 = Rp 10,308

NOTES

In this report, "$" refers to US dollars.

The fiscal year (FY) of the Government and its agencies ends on 31 December.

iii ETESP Fisheries Component Completion Report

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Fisheries Component of ETESP (ETESP-Fisheries) has supported rehabilitation and restoration of the fisheries sector and coastal natural resources in Aceh and Nias. ETESP- Fisheries had six subcomponents: (i) community empowerment; (ii) small-scale capture fisheries; (iii) small-scale aquaculture; (iv) small-scale fish landings and post harvest facilities; (v) coastal resources rehabilitation; and (v) support fisheries services restoration. It supported the rehabilitation of livelihoods of tsunami and earthquake affected people in eleven districts and towns in Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam (NAD) and North Sumatra: Aceh Besar; Aceh Utara; Pidie; Nias; Nias Selatan; Banda Aceh; Bireuen; Lhokseumawe; Aceh Jaya; Aceh Barat; and Simeulue. In addition to the 6 sub-components which principally dealt with restoration and rehabilitation, the ETESP Fisheries developed innovative capacity building and training subprojects aimed at improving small-scale producer livelihoods in coastal aquaculture and capture fisheries. These subprojects were development of the Aceh Aquaculture Communication Centre and Aquaculture Livelihoods Service Centres, Capture Fisheries Livelihoods Service Centres, and Community Based Bathymetric Survey (Sonar Mapping). The overall goal of the ETESP has been to help rebuild the affected regions and support their economic revival to meet the Millennium Development Goals. Its purpose has been to (i) facilitate economic revival in the affected regions by restoring livelihoods; and (ii) alleviate constraints due to the lack of adequate public goods and facilities by restoring essential public services and rebuilding infrastructure. The ETESP Fisheries Component had an overall allocated budget of US$30 million. The consultants and implementing agencies mobilised in September 2005 and the component closed in June 2009. BRR designated the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (MMAF) as the Implementing Agency (IA) of ETESP-Fisheries. A MMAF Project Management Unit (PMU) was established by MMAF in December 2005 in Banda Aceh, with responsibility for coordination and management of ETESP-Fisheries of the 2005 budget, extended till December 2006 (2006L). In 2006, BRR was designated as the Implementing Agency (IA) of ETESP-Fisheries for the 2006 budget and remained as IA until the end of the Fisheries component in 2009. During the course of component implementation there were a total of 5 Project Management Units (Satkers), each one corresponding to a GOI annual budget (DIPA). For 2 years there was wide scale input by a separately contracted Indonesian NGO, Bina Swadaya to facilitate the social empowerment aspect of Fisheries, Agriculture and Irrigation components. In Fisheries their main activities were associated with “socialising” village grants (SC1) and community contracts for tambaks and agroinputs (SC3) The Community Mobilisation Specialists (CMF) and Community Facilitators (CF) were based at village level. The ETESP Fisheries component exceeded considerably the original targets set out in the objectives of the component logframe. These targets, outputs and achievements of ETESP Fisheries are summarised clearly in the following table:

iv ETESP Fisheries Component Completion Report

No Output Targets and Indicators Progress/achievements

ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT OBJECTIVES

Agricultural and o Fishponds on 3,000 ha are o 3,178 ha restored before June 2009 fisheries restored to pre-tsunami o ETESP Fisheries ponds rehabilitation production in the levels by end 2007 directly benefitted 4,793 small scale aquaculture farmers and their families in affected areas Aceh and Nias before June 2009 restored o Other beneficiaries from aquaculture livelihoods activities total >6,235 o Many more will benefit from AACC/ALSC network o Further beneficiaries from trading and marketing o 13,000 small scale fishers o ETESP Fisheries benefitted an estimated resume fishing by end 2007 18,000 small scale fishers and families in Aceh and Nias by June 2009

ON BUDGET – ETESP FISHERIES

Activities under Outputs Comments SubComponent

Subcomponent 1: Community empowerment

1.1 Community contracts o 243 contracts o Grants delivered through community issued/completed under contracts – contracts completed ~ SC1 16% of ETESP overall budget o 17,862 beneficiaries o Producer groups get experience in working with contracts o Wide range of livelihoods restarted o Hygiene and industry licencing obtained by producer groups 1.2 Funds disbursed o Rp.45,618,757,481 o Total amount on budget through DIPA 2006 -2007-2008 1.3 Fishers/farmers trained o 17,862 beneficiaries o Relevant technical training associated with community contracts Subcomponent 2: Restoration of capture fisheries

2.1 Boats & fishing gear o 141 boats o Larger boats tendered & contracted o 5GT – 87 o Some smaller boats under o 10GT – 18 community contracts on Nias & o 15GT – 22 Simeulue o 20GT – 14 o Fishers consulted during design o >300 small boats stage o Participatory monitoring by beneficiary fishers during construction 2.2 o 141 sets of fishing gear o To accompany boats

o 600 fishing lights o Floating & submersible lamps o 1200 beneficiaries o Total cost Rp.656,560,000 2.3 Fishers trained o 1,599 trainees o Training in gear, boat design, GPS, fish finders, radio, etc. Subcomponent 3: Restoration of aquaculture facilities

v ETESP Fisheries Component Completion Report

3.1 Shrimp/milkfish ponds o 3,178ha ponds restored o Note the successful use of restored/ operational o 4,793 beneficiaries community contracts ~500 o 6 Districts benefitted community contracts issued by SC3 3.2 Agroinputs provided o Value Rp24,144,071,420 o Note the successful use of o Sufficient to startup community contracts 2,462ha o Similar beneficiaries number to 3.1 3.3 Shrimp Hatcheries o 49 hatcheries rebuilt & o Assistance offered to 52 hatcheries operational o Note the successful use of o 49 primary beneficiaries community contracts – success 49 o >3,500 secondary. out of 52 (>94%) investments. beneficiaries (farmers, traders) 3.4 Cage culture units o Grouper – 47 Units o Alternate aquaculture livelihoods o Grouper nurseries – 27 o Note the successful use of units community contracts o Crabs – 31 units o Tilapia – 4 units o Lobster – 4 units o Total 2,540 beneficiaries 3.5 Grouper Hatcheries o BBIP, Fino, Nias o Non-operational pre- o BBIP, Simeulue tsunami/earthquakes o Rebuilt, equipped and improved o New local staff appointed by DKP o 16 DKP staff trained by ETESP Consultants in 2 BBIP o Both hatcheries now active and spawning grouper 3.6 Seaweed farming o Production units set up o Prospective seaweed farmers (men o Nias – 3 units and women) encouraged to form o Nisel – 6 units cooperating groups which were Beneficiaries - 145 o trained by NACA and national o Farmers trained consultants in farming techniques, processing and marketing. Bulk harvesting and marketing required to overcome relatively low value/volume ratio of product and to achieve quantities which are feasible for buyers to transport with adequate economies of scale from remote locations.”

o “Trials carried out in coordination with COREMAP show that the southern islands of the Nias group (P.Telo, Hibala, etc) have the best water quality conditions for seaweed; trials elsewhere in Nias were less successful”.

o “Seaweed produced was marketed in trial quantities to Jakarta buyers and to COREMAP for replication as seed stock 3.7 Fish farmer training o 5,455 beneficiaries o The tilapia, grouper, seaweed, pond o 9 districts, 2 farmer construction have been fully municipalities supported with practical on site training.

vi ETESP Fisheries Component Completion Report

o Simeulue grouper farmers have marketed their products. o Nias and Nias Selatan seaweed farming supported by ADB ETESP Fisheries have revealed positive influence in regions. Some villages/investors/other donors (Coremap) have replicated seaweed farming in Nias Selatan. o Hatchery operators have financed and started their own fish hatcheries independently after receiving fish hatchery training. o Farmers’ skills in better management practices improved. 3.8 Manuals, brochures, o 35 publications o Coordination between donors and posters o ~25,000 beneficiaries GoI to produce BMP and distribute manuals, posters o Village by village BMP video film shows 3.9 Publicity o Website o www.acehfisheries.org o Newspapers – national o BMP for aquaculture video joint and international production by o Video ADB/NACA/FAO/IFC/WWF. Subcomponent 4: Restoration of small-scale fisheries post-harvest facilities

4.1 Fish landings/ jetties o 19 rebuilt o Major policy shift required on o 8,523 beneficiaries ownership and management from “state/local government asset” to producer group. o Where possible co-management advice and training given o ETESP unable to tackle estuarine access and perennial dredging problem 4.2 Fish markets o 4 rebuilt o Major policy shift required on o 4,000 beneficiaries ownership and management from “state/local government asset” to market user group. o Where possible co-management advice and training given by consultants 4.3 Packing sheds o 1 rebuilt o * ditto * o 100 beneficiaries 4.4 Deep wells o 2 rebuilt o * ditto * o 600 beneficiaries 4.5 Marine fuel depots o 11 rebuilt o * ditto * o 5,500 beneficiaries o General public also benefit from local availability of kerosene, petrol, lubricants 4.6 Ice plants o 4 ice plants built o 4 ice plants built: Aceh Utara, Aceh Jaya, Simeulue, Nias and Nias Selatan” o “Economies of scale apply and early survey showed that ice plants of less than 10 tonnes/day output and sales are unlikely to be self-sustaining”. o ‘Nias ice plants were originally designed to be mobile/transportable as it was expected that they would

vii ETESP Fisheries Component Completion Report

be moved from their original sites in Gunung Sitoli and Teluk Dalam, to Tehemburua and Lahusa respectively, when ice factories which BRR was planning were built. This did not transpire”. o “After further intervention by consultants at request of BRR and ADB, the two Nias ice plants were rendered fully functional and handed over to public-private (kerjasama) arrangements by July 2009. o Major policy shift encouraged on ownership and management from “state/local government asset” to producer group/private sector. o Where possible co-management advice and training is given by consultants

Subcomponent 5: Coastal ecosystem restoration

5.1 Trees planted o 1,274,952 o Mangroves principally replanted to “green” rehabilitated tambaks o Casuarina, Coconut trees planted on West Coast to enhance dune/swale coastal environment 5.2 Farmer training o 5,000 beneficiaries o Shrimp farmers and villagers now more aware of better management practices and eco friendly production 5.3 Schools awareness o 3 campaigns o Childrens’ environmental knowledge campaigns o 500 beneficiaries improved. Teachers provided with materials for subsequent improvement of curricula 5.4 Posters/brochures/manuals o 10 publications o Range of environmental o 5,000 beneficiaries posters/brochures/manuals produced Subcomponent 6: Fisheries support services

viii ETESP Fisheries Component Completion Report

o DKP local staff boosted at BBIP Nias/Simeulue and trained o Innovative producer group services begin to replace non-functional top- down fisheries extension system o Training/TOR/guidelines provided 6.5 Assets handover to o Furniture, computers, o Received donation of ETESP Ladong MMAF Training printers, etc fisheries assets at end of project Centre o Actually this style of training centre had very limited capacity and provided little input for the participatory, community focussed ETESP Fisheries component. OFF BUDGET - ETESP FISHERIES - INNOVATIVE LIVELIHOODS DEVELOPMENT

7.1 Community marine mapping o Website formed o Fishers shared knowledge and skills and livelihoods improved www.panglima.net restored and enhanced o 350 new marine charts o Traditional fishers organization (CBBS – Sonar Mapping) delivered Panglima Laot engages in resource o Fish identification booklet survey, research and management delivered o Traditional fishers organization o PL staff trained in use of Panglima Laot evolving into a sonar equipment, GPS, business association attractive to computers, mapping, investment radio communications o Fishers collect, own, understand and o 90 GPS/fishfinder units use data about resources and distributed and returning market prices information o Linkages between fishers, PL, DKP, o 10 university student Marine Police, University, AGDC projects ongoing o Participatory research ongoing o 175 captains trained in o Scientific data as basis for co- GPS/navigation management of natural resources in o Total beneficiaries hands of fishers 2,835+ o Inputs to CFAN4 exposition o Video “Mapping the Sea, o President visit to Aceh 03 Feb 2009 Improving Livelihoods” o ADB VIP visits o Presidential visit o Video publicised on ADB YouTube presentation site 7.2 Aquaculture Livelihoods o 4 Aquaculture o Basis for participative fish farmer Livelihoods Service producer associations set up with • Aceh Aquaculture Centres set up with opportunities for investment and Communications Centre producer groups in clustering. • Aquaculture Livelihoods Bireuen and Aceh Utara. o Linkages for continuity with FAO- Service Centres o 1 Aceh Aquaculture ARC Aquaculture, also WWF and Communications Centre IFC. set up at MMAF BBAP to o Promotion of Best Management provide technical Practices (BMP) services to ALSC’s o Interactive information services o Website established established in network o Technical services provided basis of extension service o ADB VIP visits 7.3 Fisheries Livelihoods o Panglima Laot assisted o Safety at sea improved to form network of 8 o Fishers technical skills improved • Capture Fisheries – Livelihoods Service o Fishers understanding of business Livelihoods Service Centres for fishers and markets improved Centres o 2 radio communications o Basis for participative fisher centres built producer associations set up with o 24 training courses to opportunities for investment and 680 future LSC based clustering.

ix ETESP Fisheries Component Completion Report

trainers given o Communication and safety at sea o PL newsletter circulated improved to 8,000 fishers/traders 7.4 Training/Capacity Building o 24 training courses o Training for fishfarmers and fishers o 4,284 trainees o NACA off-budget provided innovative training particularly to enhance the livelihoods of beneficiaries of assets from ETESP o Institutionalised GoI training difficult to provide community level training 7.5 JFPR-OISCA o Advice provided by o Unique and innovative systems NACA to reformulation of transferred to JFPR for continuity project and ultimately sustainability o Systems and information o Contributions to JFPR-IHS database transferred to JFPR- o Exit transition planning for OISCA project livelihoods sub-projects 7.6 ADB ETESP Fisheries Final o Closing seminar at o Seminar attended by Head Seminar MMAF Jakarta PMO/EMS ADB, DG NACA, MMAF emphasising innovative DG Aquaculture, DG Capture livelihoods achievements Fisheries, OISCA/JFPR, EDFF, and continuity strategies Dir.Fisheries BRR, Head DKP NAD. 7.6 ADB PMO/EMS Database o Information/data set o Information/data provided on provided to PMO/EMS development of ETESP Fisheries database component o Guidelines, manuals, reports, photos 7.7 ADB PMO/EMS o Positive publicity for ADB o Numerous instances of low to high ETESP profile positive publicity in media. Publicity o Intervention to protect ADB ETESP against advocacy NGO attack o 4 websites developed and operating o 3 websites user interactive/beneficiary owned 7.8 ADB PMO/EMS o Reports as required o Servicing PMO/EMS technical, o Videos administrative and financial reporting Publicity o Active websites (4) o Inputs to CFAN4 exposition o President visit to Aceh Feb 2009 o ADB VIP visits

x I. Component Information

A. Data (to be completed by EMS) On-budget Approved Amount Off-budget US$’000 US$’000 Initial ADB

Variations(scope + implement-ation not contract)

Package 4

Variation 1

Variation 2 etc

Package 40

Variation 1

Variation 2 etc

Final After Variations (if any) ADB

Other Costs (to the extent known) Other 1 (specify)

(eg, beneficiaries, Government) Other 2 etc

Total

Disbursed to completion date

Disbursed/Committed %

Completion Date Original

Revised 31st July 2009

Financial (actual)

or expected

B. Component Objectives 1. Description 1. The Fisheries Component of ETESP (ETESP-Fisheries) has supported rehabilitation and restoration of the fisheries sector and coastal natural resources in Aceh and Nias. ETESP-Fisheries had six subcomponents: (i) community empowerment; (ii) small-scale capture fisheries; (iii) small-scale aquaculture; (iv) small-scale fish landings and post harvest facilities; (v) coastal resources rehabilitation; and (v) support fisheries services restoration. It supported the rehabilitation of livelihoods of tsunami and earthquake affected people in eleven districts and towns in NAD and Northern Sumatra: Aceh Besar; Aceh Utara; Pidie; Nias; Nias Selatan; Banda Aceh; Bireuen; Lhokseumawe; Aceh Jaya; Aceh Barat; and Simeulue.

2. Goal 2. The overall goal of the ETESP has been to help rebuild the affected regions and support their economic revival to meet the Millennium Development Goals. Its purpose has been to (i) facilitate economic revival in the affected regions by restoring livelihoods; and (ii) alleviate constraints due to the lack of adequate public goods and facilities by restoring essential public services and rebuilding infrastructure. ETESP Fisheries was included under the Livelihood Restoration, one of five principal sector groupings within ETESP, which is intended to “Rehabilitate the agriculture and fisheries sectors, the mainstay of a majority of the Acehnese, and revive micro and small enterprises”. No goal is mentioned for fisheries. 3. Component Purpose 3. The purpose of ETESP Fisheries, in line with the overall Goal of ETESP, has been “Fisheries production in the affected areas restored in support of livelihoods recovery”1 4. Subcomponents 4. Five subcomponents were provided in the Grant Agreement and modified during the Inception and planning period to the six sub components listed below (Table 2). Objectives were also amended to be specifically tailored to each sub-component. Table 2: Summary sub components and objective at outcomes

Subcomponent Name Objectives (outcome level)

1. Community empowerment Coastal communities empowered to develop and manage their resources

2. Restoration of capture fisheries Capture fisheries restored to biologically and economically sustainable levels of effort and landings

3. Restoration of aquaculture facilities Aquaculture facilities and production systems restored on a sustainable basis

4. Restoration of small-scale fisheries Small-scale fisheries landing and post-harvest facilities post-harvest facilities restored

5. Coastal ecosystem restoration Coastal environment rehabilitated and properly managed for sustainable use

6. Fisheries support services Provincial and district/subdistrict fisheries and extension services re-established/strengthened

1 To help rehabilitate the fisheries sector and reestablish livelihoods, the Presidents Report states that ETESP will provide technical and financial support and production inputs to (i) 12,000 affected small-scale fishers for repairing and restoring their fishing boats, boat engines, and gear; (ii) 2,000 affected small-scale fish farmers for rehabilitation of 3,000 ha of fishponds in seven major aquaculture districts; and (iii) 80 affected coastal communities for rehabilitation of about 12 fish-landing facilities, as well as for community-based applied research activities.

C. Implementation Arrangements 5. Planning. Despite heavy pressure to begin disbursement promptly the component went through a prolonged stakeholder consultation process involving assessment and planning during which time the consultants were fully engaged in preparation of concept notes (11), sub-project appraisal reports (SPAR - 4), sub-project preparation reports (SPPR - 11),associated activity development reports (ADR), design documents for tambaks, boats and infrastructure (34) and guidelines. This planning process was the subject of much debate in ADB PMO/EMS and there was initially a varied approach between ETESP components although appointed Executing Agency, BRR exerted very little influence at this stage. The extended consultation process involved in planning ETESP Fisheries laid an important basis for subsequent implementation in an exceedingly complex operating environment. 6. Concept notes were prepared for each district or municipality involved; SPAR were prepared on the basis of East Coast, West Coast, Islands and General; SPPR were District or Kota based; ADR describe activities to be undertaken by sub-component within each SPPR (district or kota). 7. Project Management Units. BRR designated the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (MMAF) as the Implementing Agency of ETESP-Fisheries and a MMAF Project Management Unit (PMU) was established by MMAF in December 2005 in Banda Aceh, with responsibility for coordination and management of ETESP-Fisheries of the 2005 budget, extended till December 2006 (2006L). The MMAF PMU consisted of the field implementing unit (Satker – 22 members) in Aceh and a larger Task Force (Satgas – 85 members) in Jakarta. 8. In 2006, BRR was designated as the Implementing Agency of ETESP-Fisheries for the 2006 budget and remained as IA until the end of the Fisheries component in 2009. There were two concurrent project management units in operation during 2006 and during the course of component implementation there have been a total of 5 Project Management Units (Satkers), each one corresponding to a GOI budget (DIPA) and following BRR/GoI policy to change every year. 9. Following recommendations from NACA based on 2006 experiences, management units (PPK) were subsequently established for 4 sub-components, which were maintained throughout 2007 and 2008 (i) Aquaculture (ETESP Fisheries sub-component 3) and environment (Fisheries sub-component 5); Community empowerment (ETESP sub component 1) and institutions and service recovery (ETESP Fisheries sub component-6); (iii) Capture fisheries (ETESP sub-component 2) and infrastructure (ETESP sub-component 4); and (iv) Project implementation on the islands of Nias and Nias Selatan. 10. District Implementing Units (DIU) were established at district fisheries service offices in 11 districts/kotas under the management of the Satkers’, although there were frequent staff changes and office accommodation and facilities were often inadequate. Each DIU comprised of 3 DKP District technical staff and was figuratively headed by the Head of DKP District as coordinator. 11. There was good coordination with other donors IFC, FAO, AusAid, ACIAR, WWF and other NGOs in an informal network for aquaculture development and NACA networking skills were elemental in developing this. A capture fisheries development forum pioneered by FAO and BRR was less successful and eventually dissolved.

12. Social facilitation. For 2 years there was wide scale input by a separately contracted Indonesian NGO Bina Swadaya to facilitate the social empowerment aspect of Fisheries, Agriculture and Irrigation components. In Fisheries their main activities were associated with “socialising” village grants (SC1) and community contracts for tambaks and agroinputs (SC3) The Community Mobilisation Specialists (CMF) and Community Facilitators (CF) were based at village level and worked with moderate success although some difficulties in focus and coordination were experienced. In later stages of the ETESP, Bina Swadaya retired and NACA with PMO/EMS approval directly contracted a progressively smaller number of CMS and CF until 31 March 2009. 13. Budgeting. The RKAKL’s and DIPA’s (annual financial plans relating to ETESP Fisheries agreed annual allocations) were prepared by MMAF (DKP) in 2005 and 2006L, and due to the shift of implementing agency, by BRR ETESP Fisheries Satker in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2008L. “L” signifies a committed but underspent budget extended into the next financial year. This clumsy mechanism resulted in a confusion of overlapping budgets to be accounted for and operation of parallel Satkers. NACA consultants assisted with technical budget planning and this represented an opportunity to see that proposed expenditure related to SPPRs and ADRs. 14. Procurement. On-budget procurement, ie. through GoI finance system, was undertaken in three ways by the Project Management Units (PMU) of MMAF and BRR, respectively; by tendering, by direct purchase and through community contracts. A total of 734 community contracts were issued. Tendering committees were established by the Satker during each budget year, working to KEPPRES 80 and ADB procedures. Generally, the former prevailed. Direct purchase was undertaken by the Satker. Community contracts were provided to community groups for a wide range of restoration and rehabilitation activities. The last two mechanisms were used for both on and off-budget funds. All processes were seriously over-bureaucratised at the interface of 2 systems – GoI and ADB. This excessive bureaucracy was a real hindrance to the implementation of community contracts. There was off-budget procurement of design services, trainers, equipment and smaller items by the NACA consultants following ADB procedures. 15. Significant issues remained unresolved between ADB and MMAF at the end of ETESP regarding excessive IOCs charged by the MMAF Satkers and failure to follow the recommended procedures (see also para.29). There were also non-compliance with ADB and GoI procedures regarding tendering and contracting by Satkers and protracted failure by Satkers to provide the meticulous documentation required by ADB. The ADB ETESP NACA consultants working together with the BRR ETESP PMO tried to facilitate the presentation of the correct documentation with some success though it was a long process with little cooperation from past Satker tender committees who were originally paid from ETESP funds to undertake these responsibilities. These “ineligible contracts” are listed in Appendix 13a-d. 16. Supervision. Supervisors have been appointed by the Satkers for supervision of aquaculture, boat construction and fisheries infrastructure subprojects, however actual timely deployment of suitably qualified supervisory staff has been an ongoing problem throughout ETESP Fisheries implementation. Terms of reference were developed and consultants provided initial training to the supervisors prior to mobilization. It is observed that in a large number of cases, the supervisors did not have the appropriate competence to identify problem issues with the constructions (i.e. following the design specifications) and were

absent from sites. ETESP consultants have reported these discrepancies to BRR Satker in the follow up to regular monitoring visits. 17. Monitoring. Monitoring was conducted by both the Satker and the BRR Monitoring and Evaluation unit and supplemented by ETESP Fisheries consultants monitoring through off-budget resources. Fisheries consultants particularly monitored technical, social and environmental impacts. The ADB ETESP NACA consultants working together with the BRR ETESP PMO and the BRR Director of Fisheries also monitored financial disbursement progress and assisted the ADB PMO/EMS to compare this with their data inputs from the KPPN 18. Implementation. Implementation was supported by a comprehensive set of implementation guidelines and training provided by NACA for each of the different sub- components. These guidelines were reviewed with each of the changing Satkers and modified based on experiences. Little government institutional memory was generated throughout the life of the ETESP Fisheries due to the frequent changes. A key function of the consultants therefore was to maintain the institutional memory. Off-budget implementation activities were supported by consultants through sub-contracts to NGO’s, government institutions and Universities, private firms, individual experts and communities. 19. Primarily important amongst NGOs was the Bina Swadaya group which assisted the Fisheries Site Advisers throughout the entire socialisation and community contract process. Their final report states: In relation to livelihood restoration and coastal resource management, between June 2007 and June 2008 facilitation was carried out for preparation of Definitive Plans for the Group Needs (RDKK) – otherwise Community Contracts planning - and the Fund Utilization Plan (RPD). Reporting for implementation of Community Contracts in fisheries component by 1,051 groups were facilitated together with Site Advisors from Fisheries Consultants. Total grant distributed through Community Contracts totalled Rp 78,985,866,919 ($8 million). The number of SHG members involved in community facilitation and training from agriculture, fisheries and irrigation components, totalled 106,698, consisting of 64,742 men and 41,956 women 20. Environmental aspects. Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) documents were completed and are appended to each of the approved SPARs and SPPRs and IEE documents were prepared for each SPPR. All approved REA and IEE documents have been translated into Bahasa Indonesia by the consultant team and widely circulated to concerned stakeholders. There was regular contact with BAPEDALDA (GoI environmental agency) NAD and Sumut in the approval process. 21. Environmental monitoring training was organized during December 2006 for each designated DIU staff, following which the environmental monitoring manual was finalized and support continued to be provided to the BRR Satker and DIU in organization of the environmental monitoring systems, according to the IEE documents. 22. Boat building contracts had inbuilt FAKO (timber licencing/source declaration) requirements to comply with anti-logging edicts issued by the government. 23. School coastal environmental awareness campaigns including tree planting were organized and offer an educational approach which will have benefits in years to come.

24. A total of 16 Initial Environmental Evaluation (IEE) documents guided monitoring throughout the project. International and national coastal environmental specialists were part of the NACA consultant team throughout. 25. Consultants (NACA) with international expertise assisted the PMO/EMS to successfully respond to challenges from environmental advocacy groups (NGO). Environmental management procedures adopted in aquaculture followed international recognized norms modified through stakeholder consultation in Aceh to adapt to the local circumstances. All environmental appraisal was conducted with the agreement of the GoI department BAPEDALDA. 26. Social aspects. Initial Poverty and Social Assessment (IPSA) documents were prepared as part of each of the four SPARs. No Community Action Plans (CAP) or Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) were prepared as to date no land acquisition issues or activities were reported. Special attention was given to the land status in preparation of each SPPR and stringent effort is made to ensure that there was documented evidence of ownership before proceeding with any redevelopment. The situation is complex due to the lack of formal land ownership documents for many rural coastal areas, where traditional law provides the basis of most land ownership. 27. A contract checking system was put in place for review by consultants of all contracts for potential land ownership/acquisition issues before approval. This is particularly important for small-scale infrastructure covered under village grants where the locations were not prior identified in the SPPRs. The ADB also appointed a domestic NGO Bina Swadaya from mid- 2006 to July 2008 to be responsible for community mobilization and some limited training activities that facilitated preparation of community contracts. Environmental guidelines were also prepared for community facilitators to identify potential environmental issues. With closure of Bina Swadaya contract in mid-2008, NACA took over management of 170 of the field staff, ie. community mobilization specialists and community facilitators, to good effect. D. Outputs/Achievements 28. ETESP funds totaling around US$30,000,000 were channeled through government and consultant budgets, referred to as “on” and “off” budget respectively. Procurement processes have involved tendering, contracts, direct purchasing and community contracts all applied under an alliance of Grant Agreement and Keppres 80 rules. 29. Overall by April 2009, more than 23,700 fishers, aquaculture farmers, traders, fish sellers, including both men and women, have been assisted to resume livelihoods. In aquaculture, 3,178 ha of fish/shrimp ponds have been rehabilitated involving 4,793 beneficiaries and 51 private shrimp hatcheries have been rebuilt. Two marine fish hatcheries (DKP) in Nias and Simeulue, which were not yet functioning before the tsunami have been restored, new staff trained and are successfully spawning grouper fish. Aquaculture livelihoods grants have enabled 1,458 small scale fish farmers to resume aquaculture with cage farming, crabs, and others. Sixteen (16) packages of aquaculture infrastructure, including 26 pondoks (farmer meeting halls) have been completed by local construction. An innovative Aceh Aquaculture Communication Centre servicing shrimp farmers through internet has been established. Four (4) Aquaculture Livelihoods Service Centres have been established in Bireuen and Aceh Utara and are being run by farmers; the office buildings were restored, equipped and farmers trained in use of computers and internet, initially providing technical services and advice for up to 4,000 fish farmers.

Considerable potential for the model to be replicated exists in Aceh or elsewhere in Indonesia. An effective donor/GoI network and forum for aquaculture was established in early stages and has been active throughout the life of ETESP Fisheries (see para 39 and accompanying outputs table)

30. Fisheries livelihood grants have been disbursed through community contracts in 734 fisheries-dependent villages, providing equipment and other inputs to enable 17,862 small- scale fishers to restart their livelihoods. In addition, fifty five fisheries (55) infrastructure sites i.e. fish landings, wharves, markets, ice plants have been rebuilt to approved design, benefiting up to 30,000 fishers, traders, and workers. A total of 152 medium and large boats (in range 5 – 20GT) and fishing gear have been handed over to 1,575 fishers in fisher communities by March 2009. Eight (8) fisheries livelihoods service offices run by Panglima Laut (traditional fishers organization) office restored, equipped and staff trained to service upwards of 8,000 fishers. An innovative fish identification and market data system has been put in place and is being run through the fishers associations. Highly innovative fishing, marine underwater hazard and currents marine charts, involving more than 5 million data points, have been produced to benefit 3,000 fishers. These have been produced by active participation of fishers through three (3) Panglima Laut offices on the west and east coasts of Aceh. With the use of GPS and marine radios distributed by the ETESP Fisheries safety at sea has been much improved for around 12,000 fishers improved with radio communications installed linked to Marine Police who were not previously equipped. Ten (10) Banda Aceh university students are researching their theses in collaboration with the Panglima Laot and the fishers boding well for the future of the engagement of science with management and resource users. Strategic underwater discoveries in sea mounts and fissures have been made. Considerable potential for the model to be replicated elsewhere exists.

31. Services of provincial and district fishery offices have been rehabilitated and strengthened through the provision of training, equipment, vehicles and motorcycles and rehabilitation of offices. Local government staff have gained development and disaster recovery experience by working in association with the ETESP Fisheries component. They have experienced working in a participatory and facilitating rather than command position. Central GoI could also have learned serious management lessons as a consequence of ETESP implementation.

32. The coastal environment has benefitted from 1.2 million trees planted with 75% overall survival rate by ETESP fisheries component. In the process, the environmental approach of ETESP has been justified to advocacy groups and helped set standards for other agencies to follow, particularly in the aquaculture sub-component.

33. ETESP Fisheries throughout has placed great emphasis on the importance of restoring and improving human and social assets. To date a total of 8,768 people have had their knowledge and/or livelihoods skills improved through training and awareness raing activities. 25 % of training courses were funded on-budget and 75% off budget, demonstrating the mobility and flexibility of the consultants to handle training.

34. Technical and organizational training has been delivered through 127 training courses/packages and numerous training brochures, manuals and posters distributed by ETESP, several were prepared in collaboration with other donors or agencies. Three ETESP Fisheries related websites (www.acehfisheries.org ; www.tambak.org ; www.panglima.net ) are fully operational with 2 in the hands of local fisher and farmer organizations, and one operating from the inter-governmental Network for Aquaculture in Asia and Pacific. ETESP Fisheries data was progressively transferred to the PMO/EMS database, and both soft and hard copies of all reports, technical documents have been provided. Relevant information was also transferred to OISCA/JFPR management to assist their transitional support and consolidation of the both Aquaculture and Capture Fisheries Livelihoods Centres

35. There was a notable contribution to the success of ADB ETESP at CFAN 4, including 2 video films and a presentation of Sonar Mapping (CBBS) work was made to the President of Indonesia during his visit to Banda Aceh and inauguration of the tsunami museum.

36. To summarize, the ETESP Fisheries component has provided a considerable impact in recovery of tsunami affected coastal communities in Aceh and Nias, has focused much credit on the work of BRR and ADB, and should be regarded as a highly successful component. It has laid a foundation and opened opportunities for future development work in improving coastal livelihoods, poverty reduction and resource management which should logically be the focus for follow up investment.

1. Financial Performance

37. The table below shows overall planned commitments and contracts against actual disbursements up to May 2009 as recorded by the ADB PMO/EMS:

ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT Financial Performance ‐ Summary 2005 ‐ 2009 Contracts & Disbursements Category Commitments Category to May 2009 No. Category Title to May 2009 No. Rahmad US$ equiv Amin US$ equiv

44b 8 Community Mobilisation 4,107.0 4,104.9 51b 5 Consulting Services 5,381.5 3,845.6 41b 4 Training 258.9 258.0 43b 7 Trials and Demonstrations 4.4 4.4 42b 6 Studies and Assessments 27.8 27.8 22b 3 Boats and Vehicles 3,454.6 3,430.1 21b 2 Equipment and Materials 4,531.4 4,529.4 10b 1 Civil Works 8,064.3 7,318.9 14b 1a Fishpond Rehabilitation 4,639.3 4,445.9

13b 1b Facilities 3,425.0 2,873.0 Implementation and 73b 9 Supervision 1,319.2 1,319.9

Total 27,149.0 24,838.9 * Source: ADB PMO/EMS data ‐ May 2009

2. Outputs 38. The Performance Targets/Indicators and achievements for ETESP Fisheries are provided in the following tables: In considering the overall consolidated numbers of benificiaries expressed in the following summary table and elsewhere in the document some tolerance must be given to the degrees of precision. For example, the overall number of smaller fishing boats is quite accurately known and each boat has two crew, so any total number of benficiaries will be to the factor of 2. However, in expressing the number of beneficiaries from a public service such as a fish landing or private business such as a shrimp hatchery the numbers are more notional and less precise eg. 600 – 1,000 members of community or producers. The table also mostly considers primary beneficiaries

ON BUDGET – ETESP FISHERIES

No Output Targets and Indicators Progress/achievements

ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT OBJECTIVES

Agricultural and o Fishponds on 3,000 ha are o 3,178 ha restored before June 2009 fisheries restored to pre‐tsunami levels o ETESP Fisheries ponds rehabilitation directly benefitted 4,793 small scale production in the by end 2007 aquaculture farmers and their families in affected areas Aceh and Nias before June 2009 restored o Other beneficiaries from aquaculture livelihoods activities total >6,235 o Many more will benefit from AACC/ALSC network o Further beneficiaries from trading and marketing o 13,000 small scale fishers o ETESP Fisheries benefitted an estimated resume fishing by end 2007 18,000 small scale fishers and families in Aceh and Nias by June 2009 Subcomponent 1: Community empowerment

1.1 Community contracts o 243 contracts o Grants delivered through community issued/completed under contracts – contracts completed ~ 16% SC1 of ETESP overall budget o 17,862 beneficiaries o Producer groups get experience in working with contracts o Wide range of livelihoods restarted o Hygiene and industry licencing obtained by producer groups

1.2 Funds disbursed o Rp.45,618,757,481 o Total amount on budget through DIPA 2006 ‐2007‐2008 1.3 Fishers/farmers trained o 17,862 beneficiaries o Relevant technical training associated with community contracts Subcomponent 2: Restoration of capture fisheries

2.1 Boats & fishing gear o 141 boats o Larger boats tendered & contracted o 5GT – 87 o Some smaller boats under community o 10GT – 18 contracts on Nias & Simeulue o 15GT – 22 o Fishers consulted during design stage o 20GT – 14 o Participatory monitoring by beneficiary o >300 small boats fishers during construction 2.2 o 141 sets of fishing gear o To accompany boats

3.1 Shrimp/milkfish ponds o 2,943ha ponds restored o Note the successful use of community restored/ operational o 3,305 beneficiaries contracts ~500 community contracts o 6 Districts benefitted issued by SC3 3.2 Agroinputs provided o Value Rp24,144,071,420 o Note the successful use of community o Sufficient to startup contracts 2,462ha o Similar beneficiaries number to 3.1 3.3 Shrimp Hatcheries o 49 hatcheries rebuilt & o Assistance offered to 52 hatcheries operational o Note the successful use of community o 49 primary beneficiaries contracts – success 49 out of 52 (>94%) o >3,500 secondary. investments. beneficiaries (farmers, traders) 3.4 Cage culture units o Grouper – 47 Units o Alternate aquaculture livelihoods o Grouper nurseries – 27 o Note the successful use of community units contracts o Crabs – 31 units o Tilapia – 4 units o Lobster – 4 units o Total 2,540 beneficiaries 3.5 Grouper Hatcheries o BBIP, Fino, Nias o Non‐operational pre‐ o BBIP, Simeulue tsunami/earthquakes o Rebuilt, equipped and improved o New local staff appointed by DKP o 16 DKP staff trained by ETESP Consultants in 2 BBIP o Both hatcheries now active and spawning grouper 3.6 Seaweed farming o Production units set up o Prospective seaweed farmers (men and

o Nias – 3 units women) encouraged to form cooperating o Nisel – 6 units groups which were trained by NACA and o Beneficiaries ‐ 145 national consultants in farming o Farmers trained techniques, processing and marketing. Bulk harvesting and marketing required to overcome relatively low value/volume ratio of product and to achieve quantities which are feasible for buyers to transport with adequate economies of scale from remote locations.

o Trials carried out in coordination with COREMAP show that the southern islands of the Nias group (P.Telo, Hibala, etc) have the best water quality conditions for seaweed; trials elsewhere in Nias were less successful

o Seaweed produced was marketed in trial quantities to Jakarta buyers and to COREMAP for replication as seed stock

3.7 Fish farmer training o 5,455 beneficiaries o The tilapia, grouper, seaweed, pond o 9 districts, 2 municipalities farmer construction have been fully supported with practical on site training. o Simeulue grouper farmers have marketed their products. o Nias and Nias Selatan seaweed farming supported by ADB ETESP Fisheries have revealed positive influence in regions. Some villages/investors/other donors (Coremap) have replicated seaweed farming in Nias Selatan. o Hatchery operators have financed and started their own fish hatcheries independently after receiving fish hatchery training. o Farmers’ skills in better management practices improved. 3.8 Manuals, brochures, o 35 publications o Coordination between donors and GoI to posters o ~25,000 beneficiaries produce BMP and distribute manuals, posters o Village by village BMP video film shows 3.9 Publicity o Website o www.acehfisheries.org o Newspapers – national and o BMP for aquaculture video joint international production by o Video ADB/NACA/FAO/IFC/WWF. Subcomponent 4: Restoration of small‐scale fisheries post‐harvest facilities

4.1 Fish landings/ jetties o 19 rebuilt o Major policy shift required on ownership o 8,523 beneficiaries and management from “state/local government asset” to producer group. o Where possible co‐management advice and training given o ETESP unable to tackle estuarine access and perennial dredging problem 4.2 Fish markets o 4 rebuilt o Major policy shift required on ownership o 4,000 beneficiaries and management from “state/local government asset” to market user group. o Where possible co‐management advice and training given by consultants 4.3 Packing sheds o 1 rebuilt o * ditto * o 100 beneficiaries 4.4 Deep wells o 2 rebuilt o * ditto * o 600 beneficiaries 4.5 Marine fuel depots o 11 rebuilt o * ditto * o 5,500 beneficiaries o General public also benefit from local availability of kerosene, petrol, lubricants 4.6 Ice plants o 4 ice plants built o 4 ice plants built: Aceh Utara, Aceh Jaya, Simeulue, Nias and Nias Selatan

o Economies of scale apply and early survey showed that ice plants of less than 10 tonnes/day output and sales are unlikely to be self‐sustaining

o Nias ice plants were originally designed to be mobile/transportable as it was expected that they would be moved from their original sites in Gunung Sitoli and Teluk Dalam, to Tehemburua and Lahusa respectively, when ice factories which BRR was planning were built. This did not transpire

o After further intervention by consultants at request of BRR and ADB, the two Nias ice plants were rendered fully functional and handed over to public‐private (kerjasama) arrangements by July 2009

Subcomponent 5: Coastal ecosystem restoration

aware of better management practices and eco friendly production 5.3 Schools awareness o 3 campaigns o Childrens’ environmental knowledge campaigns o 500 beneficiaries improved. Teachers provided with materials for subsequent improvement of curricula 5.4 Posters/brochures/manuals o 10 publications o Range of environmental o 5,000 beneficiaries posters/brochures/manuals produced Subcomponent 6: Fisheries support services

6.1 DKP offices rebuilt o Locations: Nias, Nias o Offices rebuilt after tsunami Selatan, Banda Aceh, o Total cost Rp. 1,594,121,900 Lhokseumawe o Approx. no. GoI staff in offices (estimate) o Furniture & equipment • 1 district = 50 staff provided • 4 district= 200 staff 6.2 DKP vehicles provided o 11 Districts – 1 vehicle each o DKP Districts supplied with vehicles and motorcycles in order to effectively service ETESP fieldwork 6.3 DKP equipment provided o 11 Districts – 4 motorcycles o DKP Districts provided computers, each printers, water test kits, etc. to o Motorcycles to DKP NAD & effectively service ETESP work Panglima Laot o Training given where needed 6.4 DKP experience through o 11 DKP District affected o Local DKP gains experience in involvement in Satker and implementing international grant DIU programme o Local DKP gains knowledge through association with innovative approaches eg. Sonar Mapping, LSC‐CF, AACC, ALSC o DKP local staff boosted at BBIP Nias/Simeulue and trained o Innovative producer group services begin to replace non‐functional top‐down fisheries extension system o Training/TOR/guidelines provided 6.5 Assets handover to Ladong o Furniture, computers, o Received donation of ETESP fisheries MMAF Training Centre printers, etc assets at end of project o Actually this style of training centre had very limited capacity and provided little input for the participatory, community focussed ETESP Fisheries component. OFF BUDGET ‐ ETESP FISHERIES ‐ INNOVATIVE LIVELIHOODS DEVELOPMENT

sonar equipment, GPS, attractive to investment computers, mapping, radio o Fishers collect, own, understand and use communications data about resources and market prices o 90 GPS/fishfinder units o Linkages between fishers, PL, DKP, distributed and returning Marine Police, University, AGDC information o Participatory research ongoing o 10 university student o Scientific data as basis for co‐ projects ongoing management of natural resources in o 175 captains trained in hands of fishers GPS/navigation o Inputs to CFAN4 exposition o Total beneficiaries 2,835+ o President visit to Aceh 03 Feb 2009 o Video “Mapping the Sea, o ADB VIP visits Improving Livelihoods” o Video publicised on ADB YouTube site o Presidential visit presentation 7.2 Aquaculture Livelihoods o 4 Aquaculture Livelihoods o Basis for participative fish farmer Service Centres set up with producer associations set up with • Aceh Aquaculture producer groups in Bireuen opportunities for investment and Communications Centre and Aceh Utara. clustering. • Aquaculture Livelihoods o 1 Aceh Aquaculture o Linkages for continuity with FAO‐ARC Service Centres Communications Centre set Aquaculture, also WWF and IFC. up at MMAF BBAP to o Promotion of Best Management provide technical services to Practices (BMP) ALSC’s o Interactive information services o Website established established in network o Technical services provided basis of extension service 7.3 Fisheries Livelihoods o Panglima Laot assisted to o Safety at sea improved form network of 8 o Fishers technical skills improved • Capture Fisheries – Livelihoods Service Centres o Fishers understanding of business and Livelihoods Service for fishers markets improved Centres o 2 radio communications o Basis for participative fisher producer centres built associations set up with opportunities o 24 training courses to 680 for investment and clustering. future LSC based trainers o Communication and safety at sea given improved o PL newsletter circulated to 8,000 fishers/traders 7.4 Training/Capacity Building o 24 training courses o Training for fishfarmers and fishers o 4,284 trainees o NACA off‐budget provided innovative training particularly to enhance the livelihoods of beneficiaries of assets from ETESP o Institutionalised GoI training difficult to provide community level training 7.5 JFPR‐OISCA o Advice provided by NACA to o Unique and innovative systems reformulation of project transferred to JFPR for continuity and o Systems and information ultimately sustainability transferred to JFPR‐OISCA o Contributions to JFPR‐IHS database

project 7.6 ADB PMO/EMS Database o Information/data set o Information/data provided on provided to PMO/EMS development of ETESP Fisheries database component o Guidelines, manuals, reports, photos 7.7 ADB PMO/EMS o Positive publicity for ADB o Numerous instances of low to high ETESP profile positive publicity in media. Publicity o Intervention to protect ADB ETESP against advocacy NGO attack o 4 websites developed and operating o 3 websites user interactive/beneficiary owned 7.8 ADB PMO/EMS o Reports as required o Servicing PMO/EMS technical, o Videos administrative and financial reporting Publicity o Active websites (4) o Inputs to CFAN4 exposition o President visit to Aceh Feb 2009‐03‐02 o ADB VIP visits o Video on ADB YouTube site

II. Component Rating

A. Component Factors 39. The following table rates a number of factors on a scale: HS (highly satisfactory), S (satisfactory), PS (partly satisfactory), U (unsatisfactory) or NA (not applicable)

Project Factor Rating Key factors supporting rating 1. Design (quality of framework HS o Original ETESP project design provided adequate scope and or design logic) flexibility for the project purpose, ie. contribution to the restoration of livelihoods in Aceh and Nias post tsunami and conflict. o Design was challenging due to several factors: operating over 11 districts/kotas which included remote islands; other donors and NGOs active at the same time; ensuring effective participation; ensuring environmental conformity; inadequate capacity among local institutions. o In many cases, beneficiary participation was instrumental in design and took community opportunities and needs into the design process. o Administrative or procedural design required considerable modification in order to provide compatibility between ADB and GoI systems. 2. In-project planning process. S o Project planning process was lengthy due to the complexity of Concept notes, SPPRs, IEEs the project operating 6 sub-components in 11 districts plus etc later development of livelihoods approaches towards sustainability. o Planning was more attuned to a development process, than an emergency situation. However, this was dealt with by stage-wise planning and implementation. o In project planning process was largely conducted by consultants in consultation with BRR, DKP district and local community beneficiaries. o It was a lengthy but thorough process; more attuned to development than emergency. o Process of DCN, SPAR, SPRR, IEE and ADRs allowed for good focus on activities with accompanying justification. o Some changes in infrastructure and locations required designs and addenda to SPPR/ADR. 3. Adequacy of budget and S o Putting the budget through government enabled the budget processes government to have an intimate role in component implementation. o However, the shortcomings of the established system caused annual delays to release of funds for implementation. o Adjustments to budget were required throughout the project to meet the general inflation in Indonesia, and Aceh in particular. o Old fashioned audit system focusing on blame and punish rather than assistance to improve procedures

Project Factor Rating Key factors supporting rating 4. Adequacy of material/human PS o In the post-tsunami situation there was a shortage of skilled resources manpower. o This was countered by introduction of experts from elsewhere in Indonesia, although efforts were made wherever possible to use expertise from Aceh. o The implementation of the anti-logging and timber laws provided a particular problem to boat building through increasing scarcity of timber. 5. Innovation in design and/or HS o Community contracts for a wide range of livelihood activities implementation o BMPs in shrimp and fish farming o Satellite imagery used for tambak rebuilding o Innovative community bathymetric survey, mapping and research o Aceh Aquaculture Communication Centres, Aquaculture and Capture Fisheries Livelihood Services Centres providing interactive information network for farmers o Complaints handling system 6. Implementation performance HS o Given extended initial planning, budgetary delays, changes in management units, implementation, although taking longer than the original target, has not only been achieved but has been exceeded with addition of the innovative activities and training activities above. o Targets achieved and in some cases greatly exceeded despite delays 7. Tendering/procurement/ PS o Government tendering committees and procedures overall disbursement performance achieved their purpose of tendering and contracting. o Huge paperwork overload o Subsequent reporting and documentation had difficulties meeting ADB procedural standards o Frequent change of PMU and tendering committees led to delays. o Disbursement slow to start each year and became rapid at end of budget year. o Apparent performance often marred by over-zealous consideration of institutional procedures. 8. Land acquisition processes NA o ETESP Fisheries did not enter into any land acquisition arrangements o All infrastructure and fishpond reconstruction sought clear evidence of and documented owner and ownership. 9. Contractor performance PS o In many cases, the performance of tendered contractors was not satisfactory. o Small size of tendered contracts did not attract top contracting firms with sufficient skills and resources which led to difficulties of contractors giving timely delivery and good quality of work. o In the case of boats, tendered contractors acted as middlemen to build boats. The relationship between contractor and boatyard was often difficult. In some cases, substandard work by some tendered contractors required the contracts to be cancelled. o Community contracts on the other hand provided a very

Project Factor Rating Key factors supporting rating viable alternative providing they were well facilitated and monitored. o Community contracts not only provided the opportunity of creating local employment but involved communities in the planning, implementation and reporting of their own activities thereby securing valuable social development post-conflict, in addition to delivering assets. 10. Performance of preparation/ S implementation consultants o Consultants fulfilled the requirements and met necessary (i) International standards. 11. (ii) Local S o Consultants generally fulfilled the requirements and met necessary standards with only 2 exceptions out of a large team. o Two consultant Site Advisers in Pidie and Bireuen were dismissed when caught by internal monitoring and complaints system engaged in extracting gratifications from ETESP Fisheries beneficiaries. This was later followed by BPK action against local DKP officials engaged in related illegal activity 12. Recruitment and processing S o Initial lengthy processing of Contract Variations but of consultant contract variations considerable improvements when PMO/EMS was delegated more responsibility o In a project of the size of ETESP and with the scope of all the (sub) components, it is understandable that Contract Variations would be numerous and rather lengthy to process. o PMO/EMS has responded to urgent requests in timely and helpful manner. 13. Performance of Implementing S o Although there were frequent changes to the Satkers, the Agency/Satker/EA/National overall trend in performance of the Satkers became better ministry over the life of the component. o During last 2 years, presence of an active BRR Director of Fisheries greatly enhanced the coordination and performance of the Satker. o In some cases, Satkers struggled to match the aspirations of the component design leading to the impression of underperformance. o Degree of bureaucracy they both generated and had to contend with increased the difficulties in performance. o Timely and accurate reporting on contracts has been a great difficulty for the implementing agency. o Except for the first nine months of the project (2005-2006), the National Ministry has not been greatly involved in the implementation of ETESP Fisheries although some of its staff were seconded in the Satker o Provincial Fisheries Dept DKP NAD and District DKP NAD and Nias much weakened by decentralization. 14. Component management and HS o ETESP Fisheries greatly benefited as more decision making support by ADB authority was delegated to the PMO/EMS during the span of the project. o PMO/EMS has provided vital management and knowledge so necessary at local level.

Project Factor Rating Key factors supporting rating o Financial advances made by NACA to ensure continued consultant operations caused substantial financial difficulties for the consultant firm (NACA). 15. Beneficiary participation HS o Beneficiary participation in design has been a guiding (i) in design principle in ETESP Fisheries with beneficiaries involved in all sub-components as befits a livelihood approach. o 732 community contracts were issued involving participatory design of which the majority produced the expected results and potentially formed the basis for continued livelihood development. o Beneficiary groups did cope with pressures from elite groups and this sense their achievements are more the remarkable 16. (ii) in implementation HS o Under the pressures that existed in post-conflict and post- tsunami Aceh, community participation was not easy to facilitate and required time and resources to implement, and will continue to need strengthening in future. o However, achievements of ETESP fisheries can be regarded as historic in this respect. 17. Ownership by beneficiaries/ S o Experience with fishers and pond owners has shown a strong groups/CBOs tendency for beneficiaries to take ownership of the development process, if encouraged. o However, there is not yet an effective local government and local institutional support network to encourage such participation and ownership of development activities and processes. 18. Ownership by implementing S o BRR as an EA and IA was a temporary organization that agency dissolved in early 2009. o However, they showed reasonable management and leadership in implementing the component. o Ownership of assets by the implementing agency was not an objective though there has been some confusion in this respect. 19. Ownership by other S o This has been a point of contention as to whether the assets government organizations provided by ETESP Fisheries are owned by government (on behalf of state) or communities. o Where necessary, ETESP Fisheries has tried to encourage and support a co-management arrangement or other working relationships between local government and communities. Local government as a service provider rather than controller is encouraged. o Partnership with local government organizations has largely been achieved through their involvement in the Satker and DIU. However, there exists a good sense of cooperation between the Provincial fishery service offices in both NAD and SUMUT even if ham strung by imperfect decentralized institutional processes. o In the very specific cases of the BBIP on Simeulue and Nias, both Provincial governments have shown commitment and taken the necessary steps for the continuity of the resourcing and functioning of these assets.

Project Factor Rating Key factors supporting rating 20. Involvement by or relationship HS o Bina Swadaya with NGOsa o Training sub-contracts/agreements involving Indonesian NGOs o Panglima Laot o Film making, brochure design by local NGO o Aquaculture coordination group involving international NGOs: WWF, ARC, OISCA, Oxfam, Terre Des Hommes (TDH) Italy o Discussion on Green Aceh policy affecting fisheries and coastal environment o Dealing with NGO advocacy groups 21. Ownership by private sector HS o Private sector organizations – small and medium scale organizations producers and traders of Aceh and Nias –are the driving force of economic development in the provinces. o ETESP Fisheries has specifically targeted these groups in line with the goal of ETESP o Involvement of banking sector through ETESP Micro-finance and prospective linkage with ALSC and CF-LSC 22. Linkage to + coordination with HS o Overall strong linkages with other livelihood sector other reconstruction programs: components (agriculture and microfinance). (i) Other ETESP components o Information shared with SPEM. o Detailed information provided to ADB PMO/EMS database 23. (ii) Bi/multilateral projects HS o Good links established with various bilateral/multilateral projects and donors involved with fisheries and aquaculture projects in Aceh and Nias (ADB Coremap, Ausaid, FAO, IFC, JFPR, UNDP, WorldFish Center)

24. (iii) NGOs HS o ARC, OISCA, Oxfam, Terre Des Hommes (TDH) Italy, WWF

25. (iv) Government projects HS o Full coordination wherever possible with BRR planning though this had multiple objectives o Where advised by BRR of GoI funded projects (APBN and APBD) plans were jointly made to undertake ETESP action and investment which would not conflict o Through DKP Sumut and DKP Nias/Nisel it was possible for ETESP to work together with APBD, APBN and COREMAP funds eg. BBIP, ice plants, seaweed o Coordination with government funded BBIP on Simeulue and Nias o AACC together with BBAP Ujung Batee (MMAF) o BBIP Nias with ADB Coremap 26. Compliance with national and HS o All actions taken in compliance with national and local policy local policies even if not very helpful to efficient delivery. 27. Degree to which component HS o Investments made by ETESP Fisheries could influence future has contributed to policy change in policy (eg. rural development, livelihoods approach, development pro-poor, co-management of infrastructure, sonar mapping etc). o Possible creation of development model through information services (AACC) to aquaculture farmers 28. Approach to social and HS o Social and community development was implicit in the design community development of ETESP Fisheries, and major attention has been given to

Project Factor Rating Key factors supporting rating this aspect. 29. Approach to gender and S o Community contract process has encouraged women’s development participation throughout o Examples include small-scale tuna processing, dried fish, seaweed, oysters and other activities. o Women were employed in the Satker and consultant team 30. Approach to environmental HS o Throughout design, planning and implementation, management and monitoring environmental management and monitoring has received the highest degree of attention. o Implementation guidelines, manuals and other documentation gave strong emphasis on environmental management. o Better management practice manual for shrimp farming recognized as key guidance document for Aceh aquaculture rehabilitation by government, donors and NGO sector. o Training was provided with strong emphasis on environmental management of aquaculture o More than 1 million trees have been planted and awareness campaigns mounted in several districts. o GOI environmental regulations have been complied with o Sonar mapping has contributed to lost and new knowledge of the marine environment o Assistance to spawn groupers and improve lobster holding has potential to reduce impacts on coral reefs in Nias, Simeulue and Pulau Aceh 31. Governance (including S o ETESP Fisheries has been aware of cases of extortion corruption) assumed to be by ex-combatants but this has normally been dealt with by the beneficiary groups themselves. o Beneficiary groups were held fully accountable for transparent reporting of their expenditure. 32. Complaints and complaint HS o Serious complaints were dealt with on a case-by-case basis handling/media issues (+/-) under a system agreed with PMO/EMS and BRR both of which operated complaints handling mechanisms. o As reported at point 11 previously, there was later BPK/audit action against local DKP officials engaged in related illegal activity involving ETESP funds o A small number of complaints from beneficiaries, other agencies and NGOs have been dealt with satisfactorily. o ETESP Fisheries kept track of newspaper, radio and TV articles concerning its activities and was able to record positive comment as well as deal with negative criticism. o ETESP Fisheries consultants were able to assist PMO/EMS deal with international and national environmental advocacy groups. o The component itself has created four web sites, which disseminate information on an international scale. o Articles have appeared in national and international press (eg Sonar mapping in Christian Science Monitor) that have highlighted the achievements of ETESP Fisheries. o Videos of aquaculture and mapping the sea were presented to the press at the CFAN4 conference and the occasion of the President of Indonesia’s visit to Aceh at the request of BRR

Project Factor Rating Key factors supporting rating and ADB. o The aquaculture BMP video has wide showing to popular audiences totaling several thousand throughout Aceh 33. Monitoring & Evaluation S o ETESP consultants have played a major role in monitoring of (i) Internal all sub-components during the 3.5 years of implementation. Consultants mobilized a large field team in order to do this. o Intensive monitoring by consultants covered for deficiencies in supervision o Monitoring by the MONEV unit of BRR also contributed o Occasional spot visits by PMO/EMS 34. (ii) External S o Queries from auditors and anticorruption bodies (BKP) were dealt with systematically, these tended to be repetitive and non-constructive in nature. 35. Handover S o Handover of assets to implementing agencies, districts and beneficiaries has been fully agreed with BRR o Normal government procedure requires that infrastructure assets to be handed to DKP. There has been variable response to BRR and consultant attempts to influence this process to further hand over to the private sector or community beneficiary organizations. o May be delayed by transition from BRR to BKANR.

B. Ratings 40. The ETESP Fisheries Component has been rated against the four evaluation criteria listed in the table below, following information contained in the file which was circulated and then further modified. The full guidelines which were followed were available at http://www.adb.org/Documents/Guidelines/Evaluation/PPER- PSO/default.asp. Information which supports these ratings is given in the previous table and the survey report in Appendix 9

Rating Rating Weight Criterion Notes Description Value (% ) o Key livelihood sector supported Highly 1. Relevance 3 20 o Highly relevant to coastal population Relevant o High levels of poverty Highly 2. Effectiveness 3 30 o Targets achieved or exceeded Effective 3. Efficiency Efficient 2 30 o Capital structures demonstrate positive IRR/RoC. o Likelihood that human, institutional, financial, and 4. Sustainability Likely 2 20 other resources are sufficient to maintain the outcome over its economic life. Overall assessment 2.7 o Highly successful

C. Impact 1. Institutional 41. The primary focus of ETESP’s activities has been in rehabilitating assets. However, human capacity strengthening has not been neglected and has focused on the recipients of the

assets, including the community and public sector. There are a number of benefits that have transpired:

• Many fishers and farmers are more aware of better management and sustainability issues. ETESP is also providing for institutional strengthening through the Livelihood Service Centres that will retain a capacity to train and act as a centre for information and business/marketing development. Other donors may assist further strengthening of the LCCs post ETESP;

• DKP NAD and DKP Districts NAD and Nias have been the recipients of new offices, office equipment, vehicles, motorcycles and computers in 11 coastal administrative Districts. These should improve the logistic capacity of Dinas to service the fisheries sector;

• ETESP has placed a heavy focus on community participation. This includes instruction of DIU personnel, who will in turn return to DKP. It is hoped that lessons learned will help to counter and change the autocratic, top down approach entrenched within Indonesia’s institutionalized decision making processes;

• The training processes have also encouraged the use of field facilitators. This will leave the Government and private sector with in-house training capacity;

• ETESP has highlighted the need for co-management for the care of fisheries infrastructure assets. It is hoped that the Government organisations will follow the guidelines and partnership MoUs developed and facilitated by ETESP in order to ensure the longer term ownership, management and sustainability of these assets.

2. Socio-economic 42. The intended socio-economic impact of ADB ETESP Fisheries component was to restore fisheries production by mid 2008 so that average household incomes would be at half pre-disaster level2. A survey undertaken by NACA consultants in late 2008 showed that BRR ADB ETESP assistance had restored the livelihoods of 28,421 beneficiaries in the fisheries and aquaculture sector, and 8,258 in infrastructure. The projected value added generated from fisheries and aquaculture activities was estimated at that time to be Rp157 billion (US$ 17.5 million). This could be an underestimation since further activities have been completed in 2009 which would increase these values although no follow up survey has been made to confirm (appendix 9)

43. In the case of the fishery sector, income has risen by 10% with average household income of Rp 3.56 million / month / beneficiary. It has been difficult to quantify the changes to income in the aquaculture sector. Indications are that some communities have seen their income grow by between 40%-70% with recorded annual incomes of Rp 1.71million / month / beneficiary (Appendix 13). However, in other cases, there have been only modest changes in income, or even a failure to achieve realistic returns. Community grants have also had similar positive outcomes with average incomes rising 94% to Rp1.9 million / month / beneficiary. Additional upstream and downstream benefits are generated for input suppliers

2 ADB Report and recommendations of the President, March 2005

and traders. A sign of additional household benefit resulting from these activities include support to Provincial food security, some 4,283 tons (sea caught fish and farmed milkfish), now supplied to domestic consumers, an increase in the frequency of household meals, a restoration of children’s education, household improvements and equipment and the purchasing of motorcycles. Most beneficiaries, following the support of ADB ETESP assistance, are now able to contemplate longer term investment plans. The programme has also restored 3,000 ha of tambak generating 800 tons of shrimp for the export market.

44. The viability of most infrastructure assets as evaluated during the sub project preparation stage (Ice plants, SPDNs, BBMs, shrimp hatcheries, BBIP). Summary IRRS and NPVS are shown in Tables 12 and 18 of Appendix 10. In such cases the models predicted viable returns on investments with IRRs between 15% and 126%, with significant prospects for generating value to the Provincial economy. However, a number of problems have materialised which has slowed the hand over process to community and private assets. These include the reluctance by some local Governments to hand over ownership to community organisations. On a sub project level, problems have been encountered with delays in connecting ice plants to the local electricity network (PLN) and difficulty in securing fuel supply licences for SPDNs and BBMs.

45. The Gender action plan3 has been implemented to the extent that 6,558 women have been engaged as a result of fisheries and aquaculture activities. Women’s activities range from direct beneficiaries (3,775) of village grants with wage parity with other male kelompok groups, to support activities (net mending, fish drying, small scale aquaculture and others). In the case of village grants women’s business activities were singled out as priority beneficiaries, and in some cases, women have been the direct beneficiaries of practical and business training, e.g. seaweed, grouper marine cages and fish processing.

3. Socio-economic Survey 2008 & Financial and Economic Analysis of SC1, SC2, SC3 & SC4 46. The detailed results of a rapid socio-economic field study of ETESP Fisheries outcomes undertaken at the end of 2008 of the impacts of the sub-components SC1 Community Empowerment, SC2 Capture Fisheries, SC3 Aquaculture and SC4 Fisheries Infrastructure are presented in Appendix 9.

47. It is difficult to quantitatively assess the impact on poverty of any activity in the fisheries sector unless special assessment and monitoring of poverty and livelihoods are undertaken. The national data as fielded through MapFrame during the ETESP planning stages unfortunately aggregates fisheries data under agriculture making assessment impossible.

48. However, subjective observation suggests that the ETESP has had a significant impact in the coastal fisheries communities where it has worked delivering financial, physical, human and social assets. In some cases natural assets have been enhanced. In the Aceh and offshore islands the capacity to generate considerable wealth through fisheries and aquaculture is very evident but the processes by which this wealth would alleviate

3 Table A8.2: Gender Action Plan, ADB Report and recommendations of the President, March 2005

poverty are not yet in place and should be an area of considerable concern to the larger international organizations such as ADB.

4. Technological 49. Best management practices for aquaculture have been introduced and advice is being actively disseminated to coastal fish and shrimp farmers and supported by printed manual and advice from TA in the field as well as from the AACC. Satellite imagery was used as the basis for tambak redesign and recovery by NACA consultants and BRR.

50. An innovative Aceh Aquaculture Communication Centre has been set up and is now functioning as part of services to coastal fish and shrimp farmers. The AACC has interactive internet connections with farmers at 4 Aquaculture Livelihoods Service Centres who can seek advice from specialists at the GoI Ujung Batee Brackish Water Aquaculture Centre (BBAP). This new approach is aimed at replacing the defunct fisheries extension service in the support to reestablish the privately owned aquaculture sector. A farmer owned website has been established which provides news, advice, shrimp market prices, inputs costs, banking advice, etc.

51. Highly innovative Sonar Mapping (Community Based Bathymetric Survey) has engaged the traditional fishers’ leaders Panglima Laot and fishers in collaborative activities using commercially available fish finder/ GPS to compile data, analyze it and produce accurate fisher charts showing depths, currents, navigational obstacles, fishing hazards. It further relates this spatial information to fisher contributed data on fish catch and market prices compiled into a database owned by the PL and fishers themselves thereby laying the foundations for empowerment of the fishers associations to actively participate in fisheries resource management. Two fisher owned websites have been established which provides news, advice, fish market prices, banking advice, etc.

52. The technology has also been effectively used to clear the estuaries of hazardous boat wrecks left after the tsunami. There is now a greatly enhanced collaboration between Panglima Laot, DKP, Harbour Master, TNI and Marine police in this respect. The fishers’ ability to search and rescue has been much enhanced by introduction of radio equipment, training in its use and synchronization with the Marine police system.

53. A video “Mapping the Seas, Improving Livelihoods” was presented at CFAN4, to the President of Indonesia in Banda aceh at BRR request and is now featured by ADB on YouTube website.

5. Environmental 54. The ADB placed great importance on preventing or averting any negative environmental impact from activities undertaken by ETESP and to that end employed an international Environmental Adviser (PMO/EMS) and national specialist. The NACA consultant also employed both international aquaculture and environment, and national coastal environmental specialists.

55. A system of REA and IEE applied particularly to infrastructure rehabilitation has been explained earlier in this report and a list of respective reports is provided in Appendix 11. These reports were approved by the national environmental agency BAPEDALDA.

56. Concerns of NGOs have been addressed in respect of impact of shrimp farming and mangrove rehabilitation. Wide scale introduction of best management practices by all donors in a coordinated campaign together with an international NGO (WWF) is working towards eco-friendly aquaculture production and products.

57. The combined actions of ETESP advisers and consultants with agreement of BRR have resulted in the planning and implementation of greening of coastal aquaculture with mangroves and school awareness campaigns resulting in positive publicity for ADB. Cooperation with FAO and IFC through a series of videos, manuals and posters dissemination, and radio shows has reached nearly 25,000 farmers and coastal people.

58. In addition to the promotion of environmentally sustainable aquaculture achieved through training and awareness raising and practical demonstrations of environmentally sustainable aquaculture management in ETESP Fisheries supported villages, ETESP Fisheries has encouraged environmentally sound aquaculture products, which can take advantage of the premium and demand in international markets. This increasing demand and prices can be translated into improved incomes and livelihoods of local producers. This approach was initiated by ETESP and can be sustained through joint actions of the innovative ALSC network in association with OISCA/JFPR, and other partners showing an interest in cooperating with the network.

59. Restoration of two marine fish hatcheries (BBIP) on the islands of Simeulue and Nias have the prospect of reducing the pressure on fish populations of coral reefs by supplying grouper seed for the growing cage farming industry.

60. The restoration of fish landing sites in many places has drawn attention locally to the need for a government/private contracted service for regular dredging of estuary mouths. Sediment loads from rivers and sea rapidly accumulate under the influence of marine currents to form sand bars which obstruct navigation and access. ADB has complexities to address this issue due to stringent environmental requirements surrounding all dredging activities.

61. The imposition of timber supply licencing (FAKO) in Aceh caused considerable impact and difficulty to boat yards to obtain supplies of good quality timber. Local conservative tradition towards wood as the sole boat building material so far strictly limits the application of other materials. This might be overcome if GRP hulls were built complying with traditional design.

62. The Community Based Bathymetric Survey (Sonar Mapping) project has reduced fishing damage to reefs, has located hazards and has identified potential marine special interest areas which could be sustained on a co-management basis. The use of GPS has reduced fuel usage by the fleet. Sea safety has been improved with use of communications and GPS.

63. ETESP has encouraged investment in larger fishing vessels and diversification of fishing effort away from heavily exploited coastal resources. Capture Fisheries Livelihood Service Centres allied to the Sonar Mapping initiative could continue to assist having gained respect and acceptance of fisher group leaders.

64. The preference to build small shallow draft boats for reef gleaning (highly profitable lobsters, aquarium fish, sea cucumber, etc) was noted when planning community livelihoods grants in Nias and Simeulue islands. These export market driven, coastal livelihoods strategies need careful co-management in these economically disadvantaged locations.

III. Issues

65. Issues were dealt with throughout life span of the ETESP and discussed elsewhere in this report, particularly under lessons learnt. No special issues are reported here in this section.

IV. Lessons Learnt

66. The ETESP Fisheries has, apart from the primary objective of rehabilitating livelihoods of coastal people, after the earthquake and tsunami, generated a wealth of lessons concerning the rehabilitation and recovery of livelihoods impacted by disasters. Equally, it has been able to recognize the challenges that lie ahead for fisheries and aquaculture development in Aceh and Nias beyond 2009.

67. “Lessons learned” is a widely adapted term in the context of technical assistance and in fact in many cases only covers observations and reinforcement of pre- known ideas and practices. For the consultants, ETESP Fisheries has often been a difficult process as it tried to work its way through the complexity of rules and procedures at the interface of ADB and GoI, and initially in climate of uncertainty and chaos, particularly soon after the disasters. The “lessons learned” from the experience could therefore not be all benign. The lessons are plentiful from ETESP Fisheries but with changes in the IA, PMU, BRR Directors, Satkers, local government, and other related institutions, it is perhaps unfortunate there will have been limited institutional memory retained. Any criticism in this section is not aimed at individuals or organizations only the systems and procedures within which they operate, and which in some cases are perhaps overdue for substantial change, if the sector is to further develop and attain sustainability. 68. Technically, ETESP Fisheries has been extraordinarily successful in achieving more than its original design aims. However, in hind sight one will remember it as a complicated project to implement and ponder that there must be easier and more efficient and effective ways of achieving the same ends. The satisfaction of completion lies entirely in what has been achieved against such odds. This section provides key lessons learned in the implementation of ETESP Fisheries and covers various aspects namely assessment and planning, implementation, finance and financial management, governance, communications, monitoring and evaluation and policy and institutions.

Assessment, design and planning

69. The initial phase of ETESP Fisheries implementation involved detailed assessments of impacts and needs, completion of documentation (such as the Project Concept Notes required by BRR; the SPAR and SPPR required by ADB; and EIA required by ADB and GOI). This process built on initial planning work conducted during preparation of the ETESP Project, but inevitably took time and was perhaps overly complex. This process reduced the emergency aspect but improved developmental prospects of ETESP once the immediate humanitarian crisis associated with the earthquake and tsunami was reduced.

70. The time required for implementation was longer than initially planned. Time was extended through annual appointment/re-planning/reorientation exercises with new Project Management Units (Satkers) that reduced the immediate impacts, and in some cases increased frustration among community stakeholders in receiving assistance. Continuity is essential in the implementing agency and management unit throughout the duration of a project, and would have allowed more effective and efficient implementation. Heavy reliance on the consultants due to the frequent changes in project management arrangements and staff required additional effort and resources. Flexibility exhibited by both ADB and consultants during replanning exercises and contract variations contributed significantly to continuity.

71. The extremely large and complex nature of the earthquake and tsunami disaster, combined with an equally large number of donors, NGOs and government agencies operating also necessitated active coordination and dialogue at all levels, and regular review and modification of plans, adding a further layer of complexity to implementation.

72. The detailed design of the fisheries component was largely conducted from a sectoral perspective. This approach posed challenges in working with some communities, where there were multi sectoral not only sectoral needs. In this regard ETESP, being multi- sectoral project, offered obvious advantages in treading this difficult terrain, but in practice implementation of a more multi-sectoral approach at community level proved difficult and was not achieved.

73. Criteria for selecting beneficiaries and their proposed activities continued to be developed, Needless to say many difficulties were encountered, and indeed complex, in determining the beneficiaries and the activities they were to be associated with. Perhaps, it is now evident that whilst giving a lead in determining the selection of the beneficiaries and the proposed activities thereof, are best to be determined by the respective communities

Implementation procedures

74. Implementation procedures built on both ADB and GoI procedures, but deficiencies and draw backs were noted:

• inadequate delegation of procurement powers to consultants and IA and the permitted limits were too low - mainly concerns need to refer any expenditure by consultants >US$500 to PMO/EMS for authorisation - ridiculously low limit • the eligibility checking that was introduced had minimal impact as the checks were delayed and were not able to contribute to management efficacy • the delegated authority to decentralization to District level, encouraged and supported by ETESP, could not be effectively implemented due to other limited budgetting and staff capacity at District level, as well as inability to coordinate effectively with DKP Provincial and MMAF due placing of District DKP under Bupati (district government) control, and as such was ineffective • There were often incompatible bureaucratic processes between ADB and GoI, particularly audit punitive actions, which were counter productive to smooth implementation • increasing delegation of authority from ADB Manila to EMS during the lifetime of ETESP had noticeable, incremental advantages for implementation

Finance and financial management

75. Finance for component implementation flowed through the GOI on-budget procedures, involving an annual DIPA, which frequently required adjustments during the year to adapt to changing circumstances. Implementation through on-budget procedures added to implementation delays, although these were reduced with time and experience. More emphasis was given to off-budget financing for some activities during the latter part of the project, through the consultant contract, which proved quicker and more efficient in providing training, small infrastructure improvements and other items disbursed through community contracts. Careful consideration needs to be given to a mix of on- and off budgets in such emergency projects in future, perhaps with more emphasis on off-budget financing.

76. Community contracting was widely regarded as successful but required extensive documentation for processing according to GOI procedures. This was made further difficult by non-conforming rural communities. Reporting on community contracts was considered excessive, and a better focus on outputs (achievements) would have been preferred to rather than a detailed accounting of items purchased and so forth.

77. Auditing by BRR was often delayed and negative in approach seeking error, fault and blame; but not proactive in giving real time advice on improving procedures and implementation. Multiple audit systems active during ETESP Fisheries, involving both BRR and ADB procedures, which proved cumbersome and a streamlining of procedures early on could have improved effectiveness and efficiency.

78. Budget available to the ETESP Fisheries component was also subject to much discussion and some changes which caused difficulties in planning. Whilst some flexibility in allocation in an emergency project is useful, such reallocations need to be done carefully, to avoid disrupting implementation, and diversion of project management staff from more important tasks.

Communications

79. Communication at all levels was an essential part of implementation of ETESP Fisheries, and received investment in time and resources by BRR, ADB and consultants. Communication tools were used to inform stakeholders of the purpose and activities of ETESP Fisheries, allow complaints, and share experiences. As a large project in the fisheries sector, the component also received its share of positive and negative publicity from local and international press, and time was devoted by BRR, ADB and the consultants in addressing various issues that emerged. In hindsight, more emphasis should have been given towards development of the communications strategy during early implementation, and keeping the public informed of progress pro-actively through local press including radio and television.

80. Communication of technical information through manuals, bulletins, posters, websites and word of mouth was well received by the coastal public and appreciated by the rural producer level despite high adult illiteracy rates; high visual impact content is necessary; the information service should be a key function of any recovery or development project.

81. The complaints mechanism developed by ADB and BRR served a useful purpose in addressing complaints but there was some overlap between communication channels at times. Most successful resolution occurred when there was a focus on local resolution of a problem; care needed not to use conflict for publicity or political gain or social research purposes. Sensitive and skilled approaches are necessary, particularly given the history of conflict and natural disaster in Acehnese coastal communities, as investigations conducted also risked reopening or fuelling divisions within society.

Monitoring, supervision and reporting

82. Reporting was conducted at various levels in accordance with ADB and GOI procedures. For community contracts, reporting requirements were excessive, overlapping and shifting; overly focused on accounting for inputs/not sufficiently focused on outputs; exacerbated by multi-level, micro-management. Simpler procedures would have been more effective in facilitating the delivery of community contracts, and would also have enabled gaining a higher degree of communal appreciation and acceptance.

83. Supervising consultants were particularly needed to control the quality of boats and infrastructure delivered by contractors and sub-contractors although it is recognized that this could place very difficult responsibilities on the consultant. The poor quality of supervision consultants, hired on-budget through the DIPA, led to increasing emphasis on monitoring by consultants. In hindsight, a separate supervision consultant should have been employed off- budget (as in the ETESP Housing component), although careful coordination with the implementation consultants would have been necessary.

Policy and institutions

84. ETESP Fisheries began in a policy and institutional, near vacuum which was only partially filled later by the shifting and often late decision making of the second IA, BRR and a recently elected provincial and local government. On the other hand, this is not surprising bearing in mind the enormity of the disaster and the political mileu that existed in Aceh.

85. It is often acknowledged that the general national decentralization policy in Indonesia still appears opaque and limited to an administrative and political exercise, and is yet to be backed by efficient transfer of resources, i.e., the human skills or finance to district level or reorganization of the functions of the former centralized civil service system. Nor do the District level governments appear capable of efficiently using increased resources at present.

86. It is the considered view that the Provincial and District Governments in NAD are still not fully prepared to deal with development planning and transmission of the considerable national source funds potentially available for development in Aceh, more so in an emergency and or in response to a “disaster” situation .

87. The project had to contend with initial low levels of trust between all stakeholders (especially between government and public after prolonged conflict and political instability) and was reflected by the volume of paperwork created to bridge the accountability and governance gap. The consultants were of the view that many donors condoned or even encouraged this state of affairs by proliferation and induction of their own procedures. Bureaucracy is second only to corruption as a prime factor in inefficiency of delivering aid and its remedy is so far largely overlooked.

88. Sustainable management of the fisheries and aquaculture sector in future will require considerable institutional and policy development. The management of some assets provided by ADB ETESP Fisheries, as well as other donors, during the emergency phase, requires effective management institutions, which are not widely available. Some progress was made in the latter part of ETESP Fisheries in supporting local farmer and fisher-owned institutions through the livelihood center initiatives, but further development of such institutions in future will be necessary.

ETESP-Fisheries Subcomponents

89. Below we consider the more specific lessons relating to design and implementation of each of the six sub-components of ETESP-Fisheries. In general, the design of the component into six distinct, but linked, sub-components was a useful and a pragmatic approach. However, care was needed in implementation to ensure coordination. The spreading out of sub-components over wide geographical areas of Aceh and Nias increased the impact of ETESP Fisheries, but the question remains of whether a more geographically limited focus including all sub-components in an integrated way would have been more effective in rebuilding livelihoods. Although one could be wise in hindsight, such an approach on the other hand, would have left out communities that needed rehabilitation and support, and would not have been welcomed by the community at large.

SC1 Community Empowerment

90. The community empowerment sub-component was widely recognized as an effective method of delivering substantial assistance through small grants to coastal communities based more precisely on the needs of the communities. More than 17,862 people in coastal villages across Aceh and Nias benefited directly from financial assistance and capacity building for rebuilding of small-scale community infrastructure, household and group assets and other items necessary to rebuild livelihoods. The approach was effective, but there are also some lessons learned on its application:

i. Contracting of communities through small grants proved more successful for achieving rehabilitation of community assets than use of “outside” contractors. External contractors were not well received by many communities, whereas the community contracting process allowed requirements to be based on community needs with much stronger ownership when communities were more directly involved in planning and implementation. The approach however, required significant investment in time and people to provide the support necessary for planning, implementation and reporting of the community grants.

ii. Trained facilitators assisted communities to plan and monitor community grants (hired through an NGO, or NACA consultants), but such facilitators (Bina Swadaya NGO, SA, DIU) needed thorough orientation and training in their functions and understanding of livelihoods approaches before starting. More extensive training, and pre-selection to eliminate embedded “technical” or “top down” approach would have been useful. Other key points are (a) community facilitation must be done by persons respected and trusted by the community; respect and trust take time to earn but trust is a greater guarantee of success than any piece of paper; (b) care must be taken to

approach the rehabilitation work as development with the community, not to or for the community; and (c) a stronger emphasis on developing strengths and opportunities, rather than the tendency to focus on needs and issues, which pervades thought and discussion at all levels in Aceh and Nias.

iii. ETESP-Fisheries was formulated as a sectoral project. Inevitably during community consultations this led to sectoral group selection which left dissatisfaction amongst non-beneficiaries in some communities. The community approach and development impact could have been strengthened through a more integrated multi-sectoral approach.

iv. Womens’ groups showed themselves to be effective developers of post-harvest fisheries and small business opportunities. The tsunami also had differential impacts on women and children and therefore, a gender sensitive approach to community facilitation was essential.

v. In a situation such as in Aceh, where a good proportion of varyingly skilled personnel was lost to the community during the disaster, the importance of training in getting back the communities on feet cannot and should not be under estimated. Training, however, has many facets, and in order to be effective and efficient has to be approached in a considered manner, that relates to the different community groups and the other recipients. Equally, training is not an all or none process; it is a continuing process, especially in respect of communities such as jn Aceh and has to be ongoing until communities are sufficiently empowered.

SC2 Capture Fisheries

91. The sub-component for restoration of capture fisheries was oriented towards repair and restoration of boats, fishing gear, some financial assistance with initial operations and training support. The sub-component was successful in providing fishers with assistance to resume fishing, but again several lesson’s were apparent:

i. Design and future ownership issues should be discussed with beneficiaries at the earliest stage to prevent later discontent. Fisher groups in Aceh and Nias were very conservative about local boat design; this aspect was often used as an excuse to open complaints and “compensation” arguments with contractors. The need for a participatory process throughout is evident.

ii. Complex tendering processes used by GoI (bidders were required to provide 19 different documents to support each bid) led to most contracts via larger businesses, mostly non-boat builder contractors who sub-contracted to boatyards. Few, if any, Acehnese or Nias boatyards were able to cope with the bureaucracy of tendering. This approach was inefficient and only increased the cost of the boats and decreased reliability of delivery.

SC3 Aquaculture

92. The sub-component was successful in restoring aquaculture and providing new livelihood opportunities through aquaculture in Aceh and Nias, but again several lesson’s were apparent:

i. The design aquaculture sub-component as far as possible implemented a “whole village” approach to aquaculture rehabilitation. This was arguably more equitable and effective in rebuilding the sector than focusing on individual farmers, or smaller geographical units. Even so, selection of beneficiaries and their proposed activities was complex, and procedures continued to be developed. Verification of beneficiary lists was to ensure that benefits are for the intended target beneficiaries. Verification of groups plan, site selection, and environmental checking are also critical to improve success rate. These assessments helped support better implementation and successfully increased group active participation and livelihoods productivities. Approach to design was strongly guided by environmental criteria established early in ETESP Fisheries through consultation among a wide range of development actors and NGOs in Aceh (“Better Management Practices” manual).

ii. The “build back better” principle for aquaculture was constrained for tambaks and canals due to local land ownership issues affecting redesign of layout and routing of canals.

iii. Some social (conflict of interest) and technical (poor re-construction of ponds) problems in the execution of rehabilitation the external contracts during 2006 led to more emphasis on community contracting in subsequent years. Direct contracting of farmer groups through community contracts proved more successful for achieving rehabilitation of ponds (tambaks) and organizing agro inputs than use of contractors. However, investment in technical assistance was necessary in participatory planning and design and implementation to retain quality of construction.

iv. Group Dynamics and Transparency. Social properties of aqua-farmers in Aceh are characterized by few active lead farmers, whilst most remaining farmers are passive and not well educated. The situation occasionally leads to non-transparent project administration and attempts to capture the benefits by a limited number of farmers. To ensure active participation and transparency amongst group members, intensified meetings with village groups before and after fund disbursements in particular were required through active facilitations by field facilitators are useful to encourage community awareness in project administration and implementation.

v. Input Quality. Input quality is the key to successful aquaculture, and poor quality shrimp seed has been a source of risk and disease problems in Aceh for several years. This situation required additional investment in technical assistance to raise awareness of selecting good quality seed, supporting communities to prepare good planning documents, linking communities to quality suppliers, and hands-on training

in better management. Contracting systems were developed to procure only quality seed through a special contract between farmers and hatcheries, comprising critical components such as disease testing and fitness of post larvae. Some issues concerning legal, quality wood for water gate also emerged, which required attention on certification from forestry department.

vi. Time Frame. Pond rehabilitation activities required more time than anticipated to achieve full completion due to climatic conditions. Delays in project start up at some areas caused execution to occur during rainy seasons. Implementation plans therefore need to be carefully developed to relate to seasonality of production to prevent delays.

vii. Monitoring. Monitoring of community project implementation should focus on farm/facilities design and layout and BMP implementations, as well as group organization. Technical monitoring is highly required from the beginning of project implementation to ensure farmers follow their agreed plan and technical guidelines.

viii. Technical constraints to brackishwater aquaculture. Since brackishwater farming had significant technical constraints before the tsunami its rehabilitation will take more time, capacity building, research and development than the span of ETESP has offered; hopefully some continued technical assistance will be provided to producers by the AACC/ALSC initiative and the informal aquaculture network between donors and MMAF/DKP.

ix. Critical mass for marketing. Due to low productivity of local aquaculture practices from many individual farmers, coordinated collective production is critical to achieve viable volumes of product for export, and to capture the economic growth opportunities possible through access to better markets for shrimp. This situation, common throughout Indonesia, again emphasizes the importance of better sector organization and institutional development.

SC4 Infrastructure

93. The sub-component was successful in restoring or improving various infrastructure in support of fisheries and aquaculture. This sub-component proved complex to implement and again several lesson’s were apparent:

i. Assessment: There must be careful selection of owners and managers of infrastructure involving assessment of their past business performance before construction starts, especially so in the case of productive assets such as ice plants and hatcheries.

ii. Contracting: BRR and Satker preferred tendering to local contractors but many of these had insufficient skills base or cash flow; indeed many appear not to have basic

business skills. Tendering processes select those who can fill forms not those who can construct. Consultant participation and supervision of selection of the tendering process is necessary but is not permitted under GoI regulations – this needs change. Skilled labour was already at a premium in neighbouring Sumatera Utara (Medan) where a building boom was underway and skilled migrant labour felt less threatened. This made it difficult for local contractors to source skilled tradesmen for post-tsunami reconstruction.

iii. Ownership and management of assets –Public-private partnership in running and maintenance of ice plants proved to be a useful model for sustaining infrastructure beyond the duration of the project

SC5 Coastal Environment

94. The sub-component for coastal environment assisted communities to replant coastal vegetation lost during the tsunami, and to help improve the coastal environment. The assistance was initially through tendered contracts, and then through community grants, as in the case of aquaculture a more successful approach. There was a close link to particularly the aquaculture sub-component, with the objective of improving environmental conditions in aquaculture areas, many of which had suffered from years of loss of mangroves. The subcomponent successfully supported communities to replant trees, but also provided important lesson’s in the rehabilitation of coastal environments that are relevant for future improvement in coastal environment, and their management:

i. Assessments: Many donors/NGOs rushed to plant mangroves for the greater environmental good, often without forestry skills, but neglected to inform and raise awareness in coastal communities of the need to care for the young trees. Community awareness and after-care support is important and was included in the ETESP Fisheries component activities.

ii. Implementation team: ETESP Fisheries learnt an early lesson that it is necessary to have a forestry expert with specialist knowledge in mangroves to have success in survival of planted mangroves; under skilled guidance a range of species were planted compatible with soil type, tidal range and other local ecological factors.

iii. Creating community ownership and awareness: Another early lesson learned, is that it is necessary that the sense of ownership of mangroves is created amongst the community before planting starts; otherwise the planting is done for the wages only and there is no after care. Awareness raising campaigns can be effective if carried out on a wide scale and there is regular follow up action to maintain the motivation generated.

iv. Biodiversity: Mangrove plantations were created and vegetation restored/replaced

but natural multi-species coastal forest was not replaced (it may not have existed in those locations pre-tsunami anyway). Since Sumatera has long been plantation oriented this would not seem amiss to many.

v. Ongoing management: As mangrove planting has created many coastal/estuarine plantations; these should be managed as community plantations with cutting and replanting schemes.

95. Environmental impact of shrimp ponds has been much publicized; in the case of ETESP Fisheries it has been mitigated with an intensive mangrove planting in and around tambaks. It is possible to contribute to marine environmental aims indirectly, e.g, ETESP Fisheries has rebuilt two previously non-functional, marine fish hatcheries (BBIP Nias and Simeulue) and trained staff to produce millions of grouper eggs and fry thereby reducing pressure on the fish populations of surrounding reefs whilst laying the foundations of a profitable industry in those economically disadvantaged islands.

SC6 Institutional Support

96. This sub-component was a “catch all” to assist in various ways with rebuilding of institutions in Aceh and Nias, and in supporting the management of ETESP Fisheries. Many institutional support activities were also provided during the assessments and implementation of Sub-components 1-5, and have been reported above. Implementation of ETESP-Fisheries was constrained by the lack of functional management institutions within government and communities, and the component invested significantly in supporting capacity building throughout the four years of implementation. Further development of the institutions in Aceh and Nias will be essential for future development of the sector. A number of lesson’s emerged from this sub-component, that are highlighted below, and which are important for future implementation of emergency projects, and more generally for future management of the development of the fisheries and aquaculture sector in Aceh and Nias. A special analysis is also provided of the training activities assisted by ETESP-Fisheries through on and off-budget.

97. Recognising the importance of the need for training and capacity building, ETESP- Fisheries increasingly gave attention to investment in training and various capacity building initiatives, through on and off-budget mechanisms. The latter part of ETESP-Fisheries in particular used off-budget mechanisms for funding training, in part to avoid the long contracting procedures etc. The following lessons are provided:

i. Conventional in-class training that usually uses a theoretical approach is not recommended for farmers who generally have a low level of education and literacy. Unfortunately, this method was usually attempted by the Satker in community training particularly when funded and implemented on-budget (DIPA). On site, practical, hands-on training approach has revealed better impacts in improving farmers’ skills and knowledge. However, this approach requires more human and financial resources, as well as time. On-site, hands-on training was more effective than workshops or training at centralized training institutions.

ii. Distribution of technical training materials is highly appreciated at producer group level.

iii. There remains a considerable need for adult education and literacy campaigns throughout the province to underpin bringing knowledge to the rural communities.

iv. Community capacity building needs a personal approach from the trainer (trainer or facilitator charisma). The success of this activity is strongly related to the trainer’s/facilitator’s interpersonal skills; they should be passionate and be able to blend with local culture.

v. Community capacity building is a slow long term process; it deals with changing communities’ attitudes. Thus, in designing capacity building for communities, the program it should consider how it would leave behind as many successful people as possible who could demonstrate advantages/improvements from designed activity. Communities will be intent to follow successful people. Thus, community building is recommended at least to focus on a few people/groups that could later expected be able to create the “snow ball” phenomena in their surroundings. A huge number of first participants is therefore not necessarily the main target for achievement in a capacity building program.

vi. Community development should emphasis community participation, encourage the community to be involved in planning, preparing and organizing the activities without any “financial motivation” to participate from the organization, thereby raising the sense of belonging and understand of benefits from the program.

Community livelihood support initiatives

98. Following a review of ETESP livelihoods activities during the first quarter of 2008, which emphasized the importance of community livelihood support services, three new initiatives were incorporated into ETESP-Fisheries, two to support more directly communities in better management of aquaculture and fisheries, and one to replace traditional fishers knowledge lost during the tsunami. These were implemented through a mix of on- and off- budget procedures. The outcomes from these three activities provided important lessons and a future direction for aquaculture and fisheries management in Aceh in particular, but are of wider interest throughout Indonesia. The results were presented to a special meeting hosted by MMAF in Jakarta on 25 June 2009 to discuss their wider significance. The lessons learned are provided below.

Aquaculture - ALSC & AACC

99. Aquaculture Livelihood Service Centres (ALSCs) are fish/shrimp farmer owned, operated and managed centres for participatory organization designed to be catalyst and drivers for aquaculture sector development in Aceh initially by providing technical advice and information to small farmers in the whole cycle from the seed selection, farming to harvesting

and marketing. An Aceh Aquaculture Communication Centre (AACC) was established, at the BBAP, Ujung Batee, with the assistance and support of ETESP-fisheries during January to June 2009. The concept of AACC was to provide a supporting service structure for the Aquaculture Livelihood Service Centres (ALSC) and more generally to improve access to farmers in Aceh of technical, disease diagnosis and training services. This initiative was undertaken late in the component, but provided positive and important lessons for future institutional development:

i. ALSCs should be farmer owned producer associations and located in a building owned by the community and not by government.

ii. All the committee members should be from the aqua farmer community and not government organization. This emphasizes farmer ownership, but also avoids problems such as transfer of government staff, and conflicts of interest.

iii. Formation of a legal entity is important for the future of the ALSCs and its further business development in collaboration with stake holders for improving the pond production and profit, as well as and also attaining the targeted goal of shrimp/fish in regular exportable quantities with a good quality product thereby obtaining higher prices which can improve the livelihoods of the aqua farmer community.

iv. Unfortunately, the options for producer associations in Indonesia to form legal entities are still very restricted. The opportunity exists for positive policy and institutional change at central and local level in this respect to assist development of more livelihood oriented institutions and development processes.

v. The careful planning of the establishment of AACC at BBAP is a practical and sustainable approach because principles of AACC are in line with that BBAP mandate, i.e. provision of services to Aceh aquaculture farmers for improving their livelihoods. However, careful considerations and approaches have been necessary to ensure that ALSC will be fully farmer oriented without them being controlled or over influenced by AACC in their decision making.

vi. Whilst it is important for AACC to be proactive and dynamic in providing a variety of services they should however remain one of ALSC’s several options for obtaining services. Government and external agencies are only for advice and information on technological advances and possibly services, if available, but not financial support. If the committee members are from the government departments, restructuring of government organization will also affect the ALSC operations.

Capture Fisheries – CF-LSC

100. Capture fisheries Livelihood Service Centres were established around 8 of the existing Panglima Laot Lhok organizations. Livelihood Service Centres for Capture Fisheries (LSC-CF) invested in building the capacity of the Panglima Laot Lhok organizations in

strategic fish-landing locations on each of the East and West coasts of NAD. The activities of the LSC-CF during ETESP Fisheries duration focused on the strengthening of community groups through improving human and social capital to receive assets, but again many important lessons are apparent for future development of fisher oriented institutions in Aceh:

i. Both renewal and replacement (modernization) of a wide range of fisher skills and knowledge has been necessary through intensive technical training programmes at local level. However, centrally directed training institutions in NAD appear poorly oriented to carry out these training functions at present due perhaps to a curriculum based system whilst traditional organizations such as Panglima Laot have fishers’ commitments to undertake. Reform of training and educational services will be necessary.

ii. Multiple challenges were faced from administrative management of BRR RDKK contracts, GoI procurement processing, technical equipment acquisition, delivery, installation and training at eight different site locations. Fisher associations cannot process this complicated bureaucracy on their own. Time was immediately an issue and considerable amount of preparatory work prior to receipt of official approval was critical to the eventual successful execution of contracts and procurement packages.

iii. Accurate identification of detailed equipment specifications by NACA consultants prior to engaging with BRR’s bidding and procurement process was extremely helpful. NACA consultants supplied BRR Satker with detailed pictures, specifications, prices, distributors, etc., which hastened the lengthy procurement process. In many cases, BRR did not have the correct specifications of technical equipment needed to support programmatic goals. Attention to such detail at the front end will save considerable time and confusion once the process has been initiated.

iv. Community contracts to refurbish existing facilities also presented scheduling issues as administrative delays in funding were more the rule than the exception for each of the eight individual site contracts. Facilitating the development of clear work plans and detailed budgets in advance of funding helped move the work along once funds were accessible. The superfluous requirement to secure multiple local authority signatures added significant time delays in completing the contracts. Better socialization with these officials early on in the program would reduce the contract processing time.

v. Strong relationships with each of the Panglima Laot Officials contributed to the programmatic success of establishing active service centers once refurbishment contracts and equipment procurement processes were completed. It was important to recognize from the start that each of the lhok officials are non-salaried positions and that their responsibility to their member fisher groups, along with their need to manage and operate the newly established service center, competed with their need to earn a livable wage to support their family.

vi. From the start of the LSC-CF inititiative, Livelihood Service Center Facilitators were supported with a daily wage contract at each site to ensure work detail was followed up and to allow Panglima Laot officials to continue earning a living. These locally developed resources will continue to be essential assets to the Panglima Laot and continued support has been assured by the OISCA/JFPR project during 2009. However, eventually the Panglima Laot or fishers association must find the way to fund the organization themselves. In this respect, wage substitution by donors is a policy risk acting against commitment and self-sustainability.

vii. The original vision of CF-LSC being services run by self-supporting producer associations should not be forgotten and external support especially financial needs to be tapered away so as not to create prolonged dependence. Sustainability is the aim not just continuity.

viii. The Facilitators should remain responsible for the continued maintenance of the LSC IT systems, radio communications and the positive inventory control of all LSC office equipment. The medium and high skill level LSC Facilitators should continue to be developed in a TOT model to serve as a local resource for further training at the Centers. Training activities generated in and around the Centers will further assure the sustainability of the models, systems and processes put in place.

ix. Additional linkages to related small business, supply chain, and expanded markets can and should be developed. There remains the opportunity for each Panglima Laot to develop their own revenue generating activities to support the continued operation of their Center. A minimum salary for the Panglima Laot at the lhok level paid by income of the association would afford them greater time to devote to the leadership and direct management of the many needs throughout their respective estuary.

x. The Livelihoods Service Centres have the basis to become self-funding and self- sufficient in the medium to long term and technical assistance should be geared so as not to increase dependency on donor project assistance or GoI. Appropriate relationships based on an understanding of culture and traditional business practices remain critical. New partnerships forged must be mutually beneficial in an equal “give and take” partnership for the long-term success of the LSCs.

xi. The Panglima Laot is now in a position of strength and need only recognize this and posture themselves accordingly. Requests for data, work detail or facility use from outside organizations should be responded to with counter requests for wage payments or in-kind services that clearly benefit the Panglima Laot, their member fisher groups or their Livelihood Center.

Community based bathymetric mapping (“sonar mapping”)

101. After the decimating effects of manmade and natural disaster such as conflict and tsunami, the community based bathymetric mapping initiative supported off-budget by ETESP Fisheries has shown that it is possible to restore lost knowledge, to reintroduce, to modernise and to improve fisher skills as part of the rehabilitation of livelihoods process. The success of this initiative provides also important lessons in terms of approach and for future development of the capture fisheries sector in Aceh: i. Carefully investigation and understanding of the long-standing social structures and behaviors within the community was an important part of the success. This required identification of those charismatic leaders within the communities. Bureaucratically appointed leaders may not be those with the power to implement programs successfully within the communities.

ii. As an “outsider” continue to add to and refine knowledge about the interactions in the society being observed and advised (it seems like about every month or so, another door would open and one would get a peek at some previously hidden aspect of the society).

iii. The successful facilitator will integrate them self within the community to the point where they are no longer perceived as a visitor (until pretense falls away). A process approach which continues to look for other social leaders, expanding geographically as well as in related industries (fish trading, boat building, etc,) is essential.

iv. The knowledge gained should be used to develop market-driven strategies, design programs where there are clearly understood benefits, or conversely, a clear loss of opportunity (and materials) as a consequence of non-participation. Develop reward and enforcement mechanisms consistent with the social framework.

v. It is possible to assist top down organizations with feudal origins, in this case the Panglima Laot, in their process of change towards becoming democratic organizations which can then provide and manage services for producer (fisher) associations.

vi. An approach to fisheries resource co-management is to first engage fishers and their leaders in technical matters which interest them – this must be done by empathetic and technically skilled facilitators who prove that the co-management is to the benefit not detriment of fishers’ livelihoods.

vii. With commercially available and inexpensive technology it is possible to engage fisher associations in surveys and research which they understand, quickly adopt and can use as the basis for improvement of their organizations and co-management with GoI establishment/authorities.

V. Recommendations

A. General 102. Recommendations are mostly covered in the extensive lessons learnt section previously.

103. The innovative livelihoods approaches spawned by ETESP should be followed up and expanded without over-riding the original concepts and approaches of producer association ownership to suit government or external donor agendas or convenience.

104. The experiences with Sonar Mapping/CF-LSC and AACC/ALSC demonstrate that there is enormous potential for ADB to provide a type of “venture capital” allied to a combination of dynamic technical assistance and private sector, unfettered by from the cumbrances of dysfunctional government finance systems.

105. The ground work of ETESP Fisheries showed that there are other interesting avenues for coastal livelihoods development and investment in future.

B. Follow-up Actions 106. At the present time there is on-going consideration of how best to continue the ETESP fisheries livelihoods development activities on their path towards self-sustainability. There is a need for all involved to distinguish between continuity and sustainability and to envisage activities which would reduce donor and government dependence and increase self-reliance. Some may interpret this as more technical assistance, donor support and government run extension; some may see the need to use funds already available in principle to the government in NAD; some may see the need to encourage investment in producer associations, private sector services and marketing linkages; yet others see the need to solve the technical complexities of tackling the regulations and restrictions surrounding international trade in seafood products. There is no doubt that the approaches and systems introduced in the latter part of ETESP Fisheries are just a beginning and not yet self-sustaining, either financially or technically. Technical and financial support is still needed to provide vision, policy direction, ideas injection, skills training and organization.

107. At the present time NACA is considering moving forward in a consortium approach with other Aceh aquaculture network partners such as FAO, IFC, WFC, AusAid, JFPR, etc. to develop the innovative approaches developed by ETESP Fisheries and to alloy these with the approaches of the other organizations, as well as experience in other countries. Within the scope of these international agencies it is to be hoped that the present NAD governor’s keen interest in obtaining international scholarships for talented Acehnese people will be well fostered.

108. The way forward for the acclaimed Sonar Mapping and Capture Fisheries - Livelihoods Service Centres is by no means as clear though the Panglima Laot and Provincial government of Aceh have expressed interest in its continuity and expansion.

ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT

LIST OF APPENDICES

No. TITLE 1 Component Logframe 2 SPCR Summary sheet 3 Targets & KPI 4 Component Implementation Schedule 5 Key dates 6 Summary of Consulting Services 7 Equipment procured 7a ETESP Fisheries On Budget Proposed Assets Distribution (Eng/Ind) 7b ETESP Fisheries On Budget Proposed Assets Distribution (Eng/Ind) 7c ETESP Fisheries NACA off‐budget equipment inventory 7d Handover AACC & equipment procured by NACA 7e Return of equipment & furniture borrowed by NACA from BRR 8 Training 9 ETESP Fisheries Socio‐economic Survey 2008 ‐ Financial and Economic Analysis of SC1, SC2, SC3 & SC4 10 Photo gallery 11 List of Publications 11b List of Publications by CBBS/Sonar Mapping 11c List of Publications by CF‐LSC 12 Summary List of Community Contracts 13 Summary of contracts and ineligible contracts (13a, 13b, 13c and 13d)

APPENDIX 1: DRAFT PROJECT FRAMEWORK

Component Framework in the Inception Report

Design Summary Performance Monitoring Assumptions Indicators/Targets Mechanisms Impact: Contribution to revival of Fisheries production restored Provincial statistics and Communities and investors economy in Aceh and to 80% of pre-tsunami levels by monitoring system respond to opportunities. North Sumatra tsunami 2010 [pre-tsunami baseline affected regions . established] Unpredictable events do Average fisheries household not distract from incomes above pre-disaster implementation of the level by 2010 disaster management rehabilitation and Private sector activities Project records reconstruction strategy comprise main component of local fishery economy in Government prepared to affected areas by mid-2007 pass port and facility management to private sector Outcome: Livelihoods and private Employment opportunities for Provincial statistical Adequate and timely economic activity in coastal one person in every household sources availability of funds and areas, and essential by end 2006 coordination of activities fisheries public services Project performance among stakeholders and infrastructure, restored monitoring system (PPMS) Increased confidence for investment in the fisheries sector in near future. Outputs: 1. Coastal communities Community groups for fisheries National statistics Fishers’ and fish farmers’ empowered to develop and are developed and service reports intend to return to previous manage their resources strengthened in at least 120 Project PPMS livelihood activities coastal villages by end 2007 Supply chain exists for Participatory planning for equipment and inputs for restoration and comanagement fishing and fishpond of natural resources completed operations by end 2006

Participatory opportunities, capability assessment and alternate livelihood planning completed by end 2006

In at least 120 coastal villages, social and human capital enhanced by end 2007 2. Capture fisheries Capture fisheries restored/ Provincial & National Government and restored to biologically and improved in 11 districts fisheries statistics communities prepared to economically sustainable introduce comanagement levels of effort and landings Vessels and equipment Direct monitoring within supporting policy and supplied technical framework

Fleet management improved Appropriate boat construction systems approved

3. Aquaculture facilities Technical and environmental International price and and production systems assessments completed by mid demand for shrimp, restored on a sustainable 2006 seaweed and fish basis increases or stays stable Rehabilitation of 3,000 ha of Direct monitoring fish ponds/mariculture facilities No major disease completed by end 2007 outbreaks.

Inputs provided and supply Direct monitoring and No further large scale chains re-established for reports from farmer environmental disaster aquaculture farmers covering groups 3,000 ha of aquaculture by end 2007

Community based Participatory monitoring management systems via NGO Entrepreneurial investment established for rehabilitated favours community based aquaculture areas. management 4. Small-scale fisheries Landing, fuelling, storage, Direct monitoring of landing and post-harvest processing and marketing delivery and function by Management skills existing facilities restored facilities at 18 landing sites PMU or introduced to restored/improved and other communities small scale post-harvest facilities completed by end 2007

Port site and processing plant Direct monitoring of Awareness of public hygiene improved delivery and function by hygiene issues and food PMU safety increased (Government post-harvest Reports from Provincial quality control systems re- Fisheries Office Fee (levy) system to cover established) costs supported by industry

5. Coastal environment Rehabilitation of 600 hectares Participatory monitoring Subject to review by rehabilitated and properly of mangroves via NGO environment specialist and managed for sustainable spatial planners use [perhaps] rehabilitation of 20 ha of coral reef Mangroves not adequately covered by other agencies Coral reef and mangrove areas Participatory monitoring eg. remit of Forestry Dept under community management via NGO (eg, elimination of blasting)

Establishment of the marine Participatory monitoring Community based system and fisheries monitoring, via NGO and reporting can be applied control and surveillance system from Fisheries Office

6. Provincial and district/ Damaged infrastructure is Procurement subdistrict fisheries and restored and lost equipment is documentation extension services re- replaced in all affected Districts Reports from District Equipment provided is established/ strengthened by end 2007 Fisheries Offices plus durable under operating direct monitoring conditions Necessary equipment needs provided by end 2006 Supporting policy and institutional framework 400 persons trained in Workshop records and supporting fisheries participatory extension PMU progress reports participatory extension is methodologies, and technical developed aspects

Milestones Inputs: Board Approval I April Grant for fisheries sector 2005 rehabilitation totalling $30.0 Grant effectiveness April million as part of $290.0 for 2005 ETESP from the Asian Start of Consultant Tsunami Fund services September 2005 Government contribution of Project Completion mid- taxes equivalent to $3.3 2008 Million

SubProject Completion Report Summary Aceh Barat

Total Units SPPR Target Achievement Cost Subcomponent 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Rp mil 1. Community Development Community grants villages 6 12 18 6 12 0 18 3365

2. Fishing Vessels 5GT Boats boats 26 26 26 3440 8 8 1862 10 GT Boats

3. Aquaculture Fish cage package 2 2 4 4 1076

ha 0 45.26 45.3 1160 Brackishwater fish/shrimp pond rehabilitation

Livelihood activitiesa/ package 20 20 2 1 3 146

4. Fisheries Infrastructure Fuel station including jetty no 1 1 1 1 626 PPI no 1 1 1 1 738 Port facilities package 2 2 1 1 436 TPI Meurebo no 0 1 1 387

ha 0 25 25 194

5. Ecosystem Rehabilitation

6. Service Recovery Offices refurbished

Total cost 9186 a/ Tilapia, grouper, crab

Other Information

Capacity Building Training course held 11 Persons trained 372

Equipment provided Vehicles Motorbikes Computers

SubProject Completion Report Summary Aceh Jaya

Units SPPR Target Achievement Total Subcomponent Cost 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Rp mil 1. Community Development Community grants villages 10 10 20 12 8 1 21 4196

2. Fishing Vessels 5 GT gillnetter/hook & liners units 24 24 36 36 4715

3. Aquaculture

52 52 0 Brackishwater fish/shrimp pond rehabilitation ha

a/ 20 20 5 5 330 Livelihood activities cages Hatchery rehabilitation no 1 1 1 1 150

4. Fisheries Infrastructure Fuel station no 0 1 1 308

3 3 2 2 2798

PPI no Fish markets no 0 1 1 299

0 1 1 529 Transportation for ice distribution in Aceh Jaya no

5. Ecosystem Rehabilitation ha 20 20 0

6. Service Recovery DPPP office refurbishment 1 0 Equipment and furniture for BPP offices 1 1 1 243 Total cost 13088 a/ Tilapia, grouper, crab

Other Information

Capacity Building Training course held 10 Persons trained 419

Equipment provided Vehicles Motorbikes Computers

SubProject Completion Report Summary Aceh Utara

Units SPPR Target Achievement Total Cost Subcomponent 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Rp mil 1. Community Development Community grants villages 10 10 9 11 4 24 4047 2. Fishing Vessels Purse seiners boats 6 6 4 4 8 4491

Fishing lamps lights 200 200 200 200 215

ha 550 550 452.6 603.1 1056 18168 Brackishwater fish/shrimp pond rehabilitation

Livelihood activitiesa/ package 90 90 10 4 3 17 516 no 6 6 3 17 20 1649 Hatchery rehabilitation 4. Fisheries Infrastructure Fuel station no 1 1 1 1 372

PPI mini no 0 1 1 928 Revetment Muara Batu 1 stage 1 1 932 Revetment Muara Batu 2 stage 1 1 679 Civil works for iceplant 10t/day no 0 1 1 353 Machine of iceplant 10t/day no 0 1 1 1544 Tambak hut 6 6 256 5. Ecosystem Rehabilitation ha 140 140 56 52.4 50 158 1282 6. Service Recovery Offices refurbished Total cost 15099 a/ Tilapia, grouper, crab

Other Information

Capacity Building Training course held 14 Persons trained 758

Equipment provided Vehicles Motorbikes Computers

SubProject Completion Report Summary Banda Aceh

Units SPPR Target Achievement Total Subcomponent Cost 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Rp mil 1. Community Development Community grants villages 11 11 8 2 0 10 1931

2. Fishing Vessels 3. Aquaculture

80 80 0 Brackishwater fish/shrimp pond rehabilitation ha Livelihood activitiesa/ cages 0 2 2 150

0 0 4. Fisheries Infrastructure 0 0 Construction of Packing Sheds no 9 9 10 10 900 Ulee Lheue deep well no 1 1 198 Tambak pondok no 5 5 212

5. Ecosystem Rehabilitation ha 20 20 0

6. Service Recovery Province DKP Offices refurbished 1 1 1 1 180

1 1 625

Banda Aceh DKP office Minor eqiupments for DKP office 1 0 Total cost 4045 a/ Tilapia, grouper, crab

Other Information

Capacity Building Training course held 37 Persons trained 1093

Equipment provided Vehicles Motorbikes Computers

SubProject Completion Report Summary Bireuen

Units SPPR Target Achievement Total Subcomponent Cost 200 200 200 200 Tot 200 200 200 Tot 5 6 7 8 al 5 6 7 2008 al Rp mil 1. Community Development Community grants villages 20 10 30 20 11 5 36 6660

2. Fishing Vessels Purse seiners 20GT boats 3 3 3 3 2394

3. Aquaculture

Brackishwater fish/shrimp pond ha 400 400 464 464 7704 rehabilitation Livelihood activitiesa/ cages 30 30 44 3 47 280 Hatchery rehabilitation no 8 8 12 12 1799

4. Fisheries Infrastructure PPI no 2 2 1 1 2 3016 Jetty no 1 1 1 1 665

no 0 5 5 220 Tambak hut

Access road PPI Plimbang no 0 1 1 292

5. Ecosystem Rehabilitation ha 80 80 111.3 111 425

6. Service Recovery

packag 1 1 0

Minor equipment for BPP office e

packag 1 1 0

Minor monitoring equipment e Offices refurbished

Total cost 13672 a/ Tilapia, grouper, crab Other Information Capacity Building Training course held 14 Persons trained 903

Equipment provided Vehicles Motorbikes Computers

SubProject Completion Report Summary Lhokseumawe

Units SPPR Target Achievement Total Subcomponent Cost 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Rp mil 1. Community Development Community grants villages 14 14 9 5 3 17 2842

2. Fishing Vessels Purse seiners 20 GT boats 3 3 3 3 2441

3. Aquaculture

Brackishwater fish/shrimp ha 50 50 84.53 84.5 1074 pond rehabilitation

packages 0 3 1 4 170

Livelihood activitiesa/ Hatchery rehabilitation no 3 3 3 3 300

4. Fisheries Infrastructure PPI no 1 1 1 1 900 1 1 100 Operational SPDN

5. Ecosystem Rehabilitation ha 20 20 86 86 116

6. Service Recovery DKP Offices construction 1 1 1 1 353

Total cost 6751 a/ Tilapia, grouper, crab Other Information Capacity Building Training course held 12 Persons trained 1042

Equipment provided Vehicles Motorbikes Computers

SubProject Completion Report Summary Simeulue

Total Units SPPR Target Achievement Subcomponent Cost

2005 2006 2007 2008 Total 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Rp mil 1. Community Development Community grants villages 10 10 20 8 22 30 5992

2. Fishing Vessels Vessel construction (2.5-3.5GT) lights 30 30 23 23 2988

3. Aquaculture Marine cage Units 20 20 7 20 1 28 1700

4. Fisheries Infrastructure Fuel stores/depots no 3 3 3 3 425

1 1 1 1 1212

PPI Latak Ayah no PPI Labuhan Bajau 1 1 1 1449

1 1 1 1 1449

PPI Suka Karya Fish markets no 1 1 1 1 378 Civil work of Ice Plant 10t/day no 0 1 1 480 Machine of Ice Plant 10t/day no 0 1 1 1345

5. Ecosystem Rehabilitation ha 10 10 10 10 62

6. Service Recovery

1 Support to recovery of BBIP Mariculture Center

Total cost 15778 a/ Tilapia, grouper, crab

Other Information

Capacity Building Training course held 10 Persons trained 157

Equipment provided Vehicles Motorbikes Computers

SubProject Completion Report Summary Nias

Units SPPR Target Achievement Total Subcomponent Cost 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Rp mil 1. Community Development Community grants villages 15 15 0 19 0 19 3799

2. Fishing Vessels

boats 12 12

Vessel 5-7 GT Vesel 5 GT 6 6 735 Vesel 7 GT 3 3 644

3. Aquaculture Fish Cage unit 4 4 8 2 10 513 Pilot seaweed farming racks rackets 20 20 3 3 229 Seaweed boats boat 8 8 0

4. Fisheries Infrastructure Fuel store/Depot no 1 1 1 1 243 Mobile ice plant no 1 1 1 1 1713 PPI Tuhemberua inc access road 1 1 2026

5. Ecosystem Rehabilitation ha 0

6. Service Recovery 0

0 1 1 969 Construction of BBIP Fino phase 1

0 1 1 1142 Construction of BBIP Fino phase 2

0 1 1 89 Rehabilitation of Fishery (DKP) Dinas Office

Total cost 11360 a/ Tilapia, grouper, crab

Other Information

Capacity Building Training course held 11 Persons trained 468

Equipment provided Vehicles Motorbikes Computers

SubProject Completion Report Summary Nias Selatan

Units SPPR Target Achievement Total Cost Subcomponent 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Rp mil 1. Community Development Community grants villages 15 35 50 4 20 24 4797

2. Fishing Vessels Purse seiners 7GT boats 6 6 3 3 735 Purse seiners 5GT boats 9 9 9 9 1066 Fishing lights lights 0 0

3. Aquaculture Marine cage units 4 4 8 8 400 Pilot seaweed farming racks racks 4 4 6 6 344

4. Fisheries Infrastructure Fuel station no 0 1 1 243 Jetties no 0 1 1 990 Mobile ice plant no 1 1 1 1 1670

5. Ecosystem Rehabilitation ha 0 0

6. Service Recovery Rehabilitation of Fisheries 0 1 1 347 (DKP) Dinas Office

Total cost 9848 a/ Tilapia, grouper, crab Other Information

Capacity Building Training course held 11 Persons trained 477

Equipment provided Vehicles Motorbikes Computers

ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT

APPENDIX 3: KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

ADB‐BRR ETESP FISHERIES 2005‐2009 KPI ‐ TARGETS – ACHIEVEMENTS – SUBMITTED TO CFAN

and

Key Performance Indicators Target component

Progress Achievements Sub 1 Area of fishponds restored (ha) SC3 3,244 3,304.47 2 Number of boats (5‐20GT range) and fishing gears delivered and operational SC2 152 149 3 Number of fish landings or jetties rebuilt SC4 15 19 4 Number of trees in coastal areas planted SC5 1,000,000 1,274,952 5 Number of Provincial/District Government fisheries offices rehabilitated SC6 5 5 6 Number of community contracts completed SC1 268 966 7 Number of community contract beneficiaries SC1 16,200 17,862 8 Number of beneficiaries from boats and fishing gears grant program SC2 893 1,575 9 Number of beneficiaries from fishpond restoration SC3 4,862 5,041 10 Number of hatcheries rebuilt and functioning SC3 58 49 11 Number of primary beneficiaries from hatcheries rebuilt SC3 58 49 12 Number of secondary beneficiaries from hatcheries operation SC3 3,480 3,512 13 Number of beneficiaries from other small scale aquaculture activities SC3 2,376 2,540 14 Number of beneficiaries from rebuilding of fish landings or jetties SC4 5,575 8,523 15 Number of beneficiaries from ice plants rebuilding SC4 4,234 4,324 16 Number of beneficiaries from rebuilding of fish markets and packing sheds SC4 1,000 1,030 17 Total number of training participants from DKP SC6 1,214 902 18 Number of boat captains trained in GPS and navigation tool use SC2 63 175 19 Number of beneficiaries from community bathymetric mapping program SC2 2,835 2,835 20 Number of capture fisheries related livelihoods service centers established SC2 8 8 21 Number of beneficiaries from 8 capture fisheries related livehoods service centers SC3 1,600 1,600 22 Number of audience of Panglima Laot newsletter services SC2 8,000 8,000 23 Number of aquaculture related livelihoods service centers established SC3 6 4 24 Number of beneficiaries of 1 aquaculture communications and 4 livelihoods service centers SC3 6,000 4,000 25 Number of GPS or echo sounders distributed and installed on boats SC2 63 90 26 Number of fish markets and packing shed rebuilt SC4 5 5 27 Number of training courses conducted SC6 72 52 29 Number of training services provided at livelihoods service centers SC6 70 24 30 Number of ice plants rebuilt SC4 10 5 31 Number of awareness campaigns on coastal environment conservation SC5 3 3 32 Number of asset co‐management meetings held SC6 9 10 33 Number of coastal and marine areas charts and maps distributed SC2 150 350 34 Number of radio communication centers and networks established SC3 2 2 35 Number of aquaculture related information center established SC3 1 1 36 Number of innovative beneficiary websites functioning SC2/3 4 4 37 Number of publications – technical reports, guidelines, manuals, posters, videos All SC

ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT

APPENDIX 5: LIST OF KEY DATES

Activities Key dates Inception Report Submitted 19 October 2005 Consultant Package 4 Contract signed 23 August 2005 Contract Variation 1 13 November 2005 Contract Variation 2 17 April 2006 Contract Variation 3 25 April 2006 Contract Variation 4 05 May 2006 Contract Variation 5 17 May 2006 Contract Variation 6 13 March 2007 Contract Variation 7 27 September 2007 Contract Variation 8 14 March 2008 Contract Variation 9 04 September 2008 Contract Variation 10 11 May 2009 Consultant Package 40 Contract signed 18 March 2008 Contract Variation 1 26 November 2008 Contract Variation 2 13 January 2009 Contract Variation 3 22 April 2009 Contract Variation 4 25 June 2009 ETESP Fisheries closure 30 June 2009

ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT APPENDIX 6 SUMMARY OF CONSULTING SERVICES BY NACA

Person‐ Package 4 months International Team Leader/Project Management Specialist TL/PMS 24.50 Fisheries Economist FE 13.00 Aquaculture Environment Specialist AES 17.00 Total 54.50 Domestic Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Banda Aceh/Aceh Besar) SA/PMS 18.8900 Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Banda Aceh/Aceh Besar) SA/PMS 16.0000 Site Adviser/Project Mangement Specialist (Banda Aceh/Aceh Besar) SA/PMS 23.2067 Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Simeulue) SA/PMS 20.5000 Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Aceh Utara and Lhokseumawe) SA/PMS 27.0000 Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Aceh Barat) SA/PMS 23.5667 Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Aceh Jaya) SA/PMS 21.0000 Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Bireuen) SA/PMS 26.0000 Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Pidie) SA/PMS 25.6200 Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Nias) SA/PMS 26.5000 Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Nias Selatan) SA/PMS 26.0000 Site Adviser/Project Mangement Specialist (Lhokseumawe) SA/PMS 9.3000 Fisheries Infrastructure Specialist FIS 24.0000 Coastal Capture Fisheries Specialist CCFS 13.0000 Social Development Specialist SDS 27.8167 Fisheries Project Implementation Specialist FPIS 16.5667 Aquaculture Specialist AS 9.0000 Government Procurement and Budgeting Specialist GPBS 10.5000 Coastal Environment Specialist CES 7.6500 Communications and Information Specialist CIS 10.8667 Fisheries Infrastructure Specialist (Nias) FIS 8.5000 Community Training Specialist CTS 5.7600 Total 397.2435

Person‐ Package 40 months International Team Leader/Project Management Specialist TL/PMS 7.50 Fisheries Economist FE 3.00 Aquaculture Environment Specialist AES 3.00 Total 13.50 Domestic Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Banda Aceh/Aceh Besar) SA/PMS 8.1600 Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Simeulue) SA/PMS 9.1000 Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Aceh Utara and Lhokseumawe) SA/PMS 7.9000 Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Aceh Barat) SA/PMS 8.8667 Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Aceh Jaya) SA/PMS 9.2333 Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Bireuen) SA/PMS 7.4000 Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Pidie) SA/PMS 11.5000 Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Nias) SA/PMS 8.9000 Site Adviser/Project Management Specialist (Nias Selatan) SA/PMS 8.6900 Fisheries Infrastructure Specialist FIS 7.0000 Coastal Capture Fisheries Specialist CCFS 7.0000 Social Development Specialist SDS 9.9033 Fisheries Project Implementation Specialist FPIS 10.8000 Aquaculture Specialist AS 11.7000 Government Procurement and Budgeting Specialist GPBS 10.5000 Coastal Environment Specialist CES 8.2000 Communications and Information Specialist CIS 7.5000 Community Training Specialist CTS 12.3000 Total 164.6533

ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT APPENDIX 7. SOURCES & LISTS OF EQUIPMENT PROCURED

• NACA – OFF BUDGET FOR CONSULTANT USE

• NACA - ON LOAN FOR CONSULTANT USE FROM SATKER/BRR

• MMAF – ON BUDGET FOR SATKER/SATGAS USE

• BRR – ON BUDGET FOR SATKER USE

• PMO/EMS – MOSS EQUIPMENT FOR CONSULTANT USE

60 DAFTAR INVENTARIS BARANG MILIK SATKER DKP-RI DAN USULAN PERUNTUKANNYA

IDENTITAS ASET OPERSIONAL KONDISI Present user Suggested V NO. Present allocation Note MEREK/br S R R transfer Item TYPE/MODEL O IDENTI B NAME Position and AT R B L TAS

A. KENDARAAN OPERASIONAL ex. Isuzu Muhammad Kasatker/Staf utk operasional s.d. 1. Mobil Panther Minibus 2 Unit BL 268 AI √ Iqbal BRR 31Maret 09 Dinas KP NAD pinjam pakai BL 267 AI √ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD sementara Dinas KP NAD Isuzu D- BL 8009 ex. PPK/Staf utk operasional s.d. BBIP Busung, Max 4x4 Double Cabin 3 Unit AG √ M. Daud BRR 31Maret 09 Simeulue BL 8010 ex. PPK/Staf utk operasional s.d. AG √ Thamren BRR 31Maret 09 BBIP Fino, Nias BL 8011 ex. PPK/Staf utk operasional s.d. AG √ M. Tajuddin BRR 31Maret 09 Dinas KP NAD BL 2260 pinjam pakai 2. Sepeda Motor Suzuki FD 125 XSD 27 Unit AR √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong BL 2267 pinjam pakai AR √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara BBIP Fino, Nias BL 2271 pinjam pakai BBIP Busung, AR √ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD sementara Simeulue BL 2275 pinjam pakai AR √ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD sementara Dinas KP NAD BL 2274 pinjam pakai AR √ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD sementara Dinas KP NAD BL 2284 pinjam pakai AR √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong BL 2428 Satgas DKP, pinjam pakai AR √ Jakarta sementara DKP BL 2273 AR √ DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar BL 2265 AR √ DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar BL 2264 AR √ DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar BL 2269 AR √ DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar BL 2262 AR √ DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie BL 2263 AR √ DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie BL 2273 AR √ DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie BL 2276 AR √ DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie BL 2261 AR √ DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara

BL 2266 AR √ DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara BL 2277 AR √ DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara BL 2278 AR √ DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara BL 2263 AR √ DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias BL 2268 AR √ DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias BL 2280 AR √ DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias BL 2285 AR √ DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias BL 2269 DKP Nias DKP Nias AR √ Selatan operasional DIU Selatan BL 2270 DKP Nias DKP Nias AR √ Selatan operasional DIU Selatan BL 2281 DKP Nias DKP Nias AR √ Selatan operasional DIU Selatan BL 2282 DKP Nias DKP Nias AR √ Selatan operasional DIU Selatan

B. PERALATAN KOMPUTER DAN ELEKTRONIK pinjam pakai 1. Note book Toshiba Satellite 2 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong utk operasional s.d. DKP Aceh 1 Unit √ Thamren Staf BRR Maret 2008 Utara pinjam pakai Untuk 1 Unit √ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD sementara Dinas KP NAD Dihapuskan pinjam pakai 1 Unit √ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD sementara Dinas KP NAD pinjam pakai Toshiba PORTEGE R10 1 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong Satellite R10- Satgas DKP, P2301 2 Unit √ Jakarta operasional Satgas DKP pinjam pakai Acer 2. Komputer PC Power F2 4 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong Satgas DKP,

2 Unit √ Jakarta operasional Satgas DKP

1 Unit √ DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar

1 Unit √ DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie

1 Unit √ DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara

1 Unit √ DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias DKP Nias DKP Nias

1 Unit √ Selatan operasional DIU Selatan Superpow pinjam pakai Unit 3. UPS er VT 600 3 √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong pinjam pakai Stabilizer Minamoto Unit 4. 2 √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong pinjam pakai Sako Unit 3 √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong

Untuk Canon Unit 5. Printer Warna iP 4000 1 √ Dihapuskan pinjam pakai HP Unit 6. Printer BW LASERJET 1160 4 √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong Satgas DKP, Unit 2 Jakarta DKP

1 Unit √ DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar

1 Unit √ DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie

1 Unit √ DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara Unit 1 √ DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias DKP Nias DKP Nias Unit 1 √ Selatan operasional DIU Selatan pinjam pakai CANON Unit 7. Scanner LIDE 500 F 2 √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong pinjam pakai Unit 1 √ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD sementara Dinas KP NAD Satgas DKP, Unit 1 √ Jakarta DKP

1 Unit √ DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar

1 Unit √ DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie

1 Unit √ DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara

1 Unit √ DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias DKP Nias DKP Nias Unit 1 √ Selatan operasional DIU Selatan Kamera Untuk Unit 8. Digital CANON A95 3 √ Dihapuskan Satgas DKP, Unit A610 1 √ Jakarta DKP

1 Unit √ DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar

1 Unit √ DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie

1 Unit √ DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara

1 Unit √ DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias DKP Nias DKP Nias Unit 1 √ Selatan operasional DIU Selatan pinjam pakai Unit 9. Handycam Sony 2 √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong BBIP Busung,

Simeulue Satgas DKP, Unit DCR-DVD653E 1 √ Jakarta DKP PANASON pinjam pakai Fax Unit 10. IC KX-FP342 1 √ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD sementara Dinas KP NAD pinjam pakai Unit 2 √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong Satgas DKP, Unit KX-FP 342CX 1 √ Jakarta DKP

1 Unit √ DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar

1 Unit √ DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie

1 Unit √ DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara

1 Unit √ DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias DKP Nias DKP Nias Unit 1 √ Selatan operasional DIU Selatan LCD Richard sedang di- ACER Unit 11. Proyektor PD116 1 √ Coutts Konsultan temporary used Dinas KP NAD servis pinjam pakai Unit 1 √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong Satgas DKP, Unit PD 116P 1 √ Jakarta DKP pinjam pakai Unit 1 √ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD sementara Dinas KP NAD Richard BBIP Busung, TV Panasonic Unit 12. 1 √ Coutts Konsultan temporary used Simeulue Satgas DKP, Unit TC-21 FJ22J 1 √ Jakarta DKP CHANGH Richard AC Split Unit 13. ONG KF-35 GW/C3 2 √ Coutts Konsultan temporary used Dinas KP NAD Richard Panasonic Unit 2 √ Coutts Konsultan temporary used Dinas KP NAD pinjam pakai Unit 2 √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong pinjam pakai Unit 1 √ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD sementara Dinas KP NAD pinjam pakai Casio Unit 14. Calculator DM-1600 TV-w 1 √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong Calculator pinjam pakai Canon Unit 15. Struk MP1411-DL 2 √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong pinjam pakai Unit 16. Mesin Tik Olympia Carina 4 √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong Mesin Hitung pinjam pakai Unit 17. Uang Promaxi 400 HS 1 √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong Paper pinjam pakai Unit 18. Shrader Promaxi S-22L 1 √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong Italy Italy Optical pinjam pakai Unit 19. Sensor Uang Optical Product 1 √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong Chubbsafe Cobra Exwcutive pinjam pakai Unit 20. Brankas s B Three 1 √ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD sementara Dinas KP NAD

C. MEUBELAIR

1. Lemari Lemari Besi Satgas DKP, dan Kaca Brother B 304 1 Unit √ Jakarta DKP pinjam pakai Mustang M502 2 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong Lemari Kayu pinjam pakai dan Kaca Topix BC 510 1 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong

pinjam pakai Style LSG02 3 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong Richard 2 Unit √ Coutts Konsultan temporary used Dinas KP NAD

Style LSG02 1 Unit DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar

Style LSG02 1 Unit DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie

Style LSG02 1 Unit DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara

Style LSG02 1 Unit DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias DKP Nias DKP Nias Style LSG02 1 Unit Selatan operasional DIU Selatan Satgas DKP, 2. Filing Cabinet Brother B 104 2 Unit √ Jakarta DKP pinjam pakai Mustang M301 8 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong Richard Mustang M301 1 Unit √ Coutts Konsultan temporary used Dinas KP NAD

1 Unit DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar

1 Unit DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie

1 Unit DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara

1 Unit DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias DKP Nias DKP Nias

1 Unit Selatan operasional DIU Selatan

3. Meja Satgas DKP, Meja Biro Olimpic MTB-1805 2 Unit √ Jakarta DKP Untuk 6 Unit √ Dihapuskan Satgas DKP, Meja 1/2 Biro Olimpic MTS-1805 20 Unit √ Jakarta DKP pinjam pakai 16 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong

4 Unit DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar

4 Unit DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie

4 Unit DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara

4 Unit DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias DKP Nias DKP Nias 4 Unit Selatan operasional DIU Selatan Satgas DKP, Meeting table Topix CT 500 1 Unit √ Jakarta DKP Richard 1 Unit √ Coutts Konsultan temporary used Dinas KP NAD

1 Unit DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar

1 Unit DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie

1 Unit DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara

1 Unit DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias DKP Nias DKP Nias

1 Unit Selatan operasional DIU Selatan Satgas DKP, Meja Telp Sucitra LH 1202 2 Unit √ Jakarta DKP pinjam pakai

Style LSG 01 6 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong pinjam pakai Meja Printer Uchiwa 1 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong Photocopy Richard desk Victor 1 Unit √ Coutts Konsultan temporary used Dinas KP NAD

4. Chair Kursi Kerja Satgas DKP, Biro Oshinto 953 TW 2 Unit √ Jakarta DKP Richard

Big Star MC 076 HD 6 Unit √ Coutts Konsultan temporary used Dinas KP NAD Satgas DKP, Working chair Isebel 320 T Rakuda 15 Unit √ Jakarta DKP pinjam pakai

Big Star SC-508 17 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong Richard

8 Unit √ Coutts Konsultan temporary used Dinas KP NAD

4 Unit DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar

4 Unit DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie

4 Unit DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara

4 Unit DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias 4 Unit DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias Selatan Selatan Satgas DKP, Kursi Rapat Isebel 186 T 15 Unit √ Jakarta DKP pinjam pakai

Uchiwa PA-708NK 21 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong pinjam pakai

9 Unit √ Razali AR Kadis KP NAD sementara Dinas KP NAD

15 Unit DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar

15 Unit DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie

15 Unit DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara

15 Unit DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias DKP Nias DKP Nias

15 Unit Selatan operasional DIU Selatan Sofa Satgas DKP, tamu+meja Dinasty Montana 1 Unit √ Jakarta DKP pinjam pakai

Modis Tamara 1 set √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong Satgas DKP, 5. White Board Sakura 60x90 cm 2 unit √ Jakarta DKP pinjam pakai

1 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong

Richard

3 Unit √ Coutts Konsultan temporary used Dinas KP NAD

240x125 cm 1 Unit √ DKP A. Besar operasional DIU DKP A. Besar

1 Unit √ DKP Pidie operasional DIU DKP Pidie

1 Unit √ DKP A. Utara operasional DIU DKP A. Utara

1 Unit √ DKP Nias operasional DIU DKP Nias DKP Nias DKP Nias

1 Unit √ Selatan operasional DIU Selatan

6. Rak Satgas DKP, Rak TV Gold 803 1 Unit √ Jakarta DKP Richard BBIP Busung,

Viano MAF 525 1 Unit √ Coutts Konsultan temporary used Simeulue pinjam pakai Rak Sepatu Grafer SR 911 1 Unit √ T. Mudasyah Ka. SUPM sementara SUPM Ladong

7 NOTULENSI RAPAT PEMBAHASAN ASET ETESP DKP RUANG RAPAT PMO ETESP BRR SELASA, 3 FEBRUARI 2009

1. Laptop for BBIP Busung and BBIP Fino will be provided by NACA each 2 units 2. PC for BBIP Busung and BBIP Fino will be provided byNACA each 2 units 3. Printer for BBIP Busung and BBIP Fino will be provided by NACA each 1 unit 4. DKP will prepare a letter explained that the entire ETESP assets under DKP and still be used (address to PMO ETESP BRR) 5. PMO will delivers a letter to MMAF at Jakarta to further process the transfer and/or write-off the assets as detail attached of which copied to: - Konsultan (NACA) - EMS - Deputi Bidang Ekonomi dan Usaha BRR

Team Leader Consultan ETESP ADB Perikanan Ka. Satgas Serah Terima Aset Team Leader PMO ETESP BRR

Signed Signed Signed

Richard Coutts Yusya Abubakar Addie Permono

NOTULENSI RAPAT PEMBAHASAN ASET ETESP DKP RUANG RAPAT PMO ETESP BRR SELASA, 3 FEBRUARI 2009

1. Laptop untuk BBIP Busung dan BBIP Fino akan diberikan oleh Konsultan ETESP ADB Perikanan (NACA) masing-masing 2 unit 2. PC untuk BBIP Busung dan BBIP Fino akan diberikan oleh Konsultan ETESP ADB Perikanan (NACA) masing-masing 2 unit 3. Printer untuk BBIP Busung dan BBIP Fino akan diberikan oleh Konsultan ETESP ADB Perikanan (NACA) masing-masing 1 unit 4. DKP membuat surat yang menerangkan bahwa seluruh aset ETESP berada di DKP dan masih digunakan (ditujukan kepada PMO ETESP BRR) 5. PMO akan menyampaikan Surat ke DKP di Jakarta untuk memproses lebih lanjut tentang pelimpahan dan/atau penghapusan aset dengan rincian sebagaimana terlampir yang ditembuskan kepada : - Konsultan (NACA) - EMS - Deputi Bidang Ekonomi dan Usaha BRR

Ka. Satgas Serah Team Leader PMO Team Leader Consultan ETESP ADB Perikanan Terima Aset ETESP BRR

Richard Coutts Yusya Abubakar Addie Permono

ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT APPENDIX 7c Inventory of Electronic Equipment Procured Off‐Budget by ETESP NACA Consultants with Proposed Hand Over at May 2009 Total Item No Item Type/Brand Note: present condition/location Transfer to Number Unit

a. 2 units to BBIP Busong b. 2 units to BBIP Fino Working and in 1 Laptop ION (PT Metrodata) / Pentium M 16 units c. 3 units to LSC‐CF Good Condition d. 5 units to JFPR e. 4 units to CBBS

2 Laptop Dell 1 Unit Irna AACC

3 Laptop Toshiba 1 Unit Working CBBS

4 Laptop Zyrex 1 Unit Chacha CBBS

4 working a. 4 units CBBS 5 Printer Epson CX 1500 8 Units 4 damage b. 4 units AACC

a. BBIP Busong 6 Printer Epson CX 3500 2 Units Working b. BBIP Fino

7 Printer HP 2605 Colour Laser Jet 1 unit Working (80%) ALSC

8 Printer HP 2655 BW 1 unit Working CBBS

9 Printer + Photo Copier Panasonic 1820 E 1 unit Working DKP NAD?

10 Scanner Canon Lide 25 1 Unit Working CBBS

11 PC HP AMD PC W5070I 1 unit Working LSC‐CF

a. 1 unit BBIP Busong 12 PC HP AMD α 1238I 2 units Working b. 1 unit BBIP Fino

From WFP a. 4 units CBBS 13 GPS Garmin eTrex 8 units (loan; no documentation) b. 4 units AACC

a. 1 unit BBIP Busong other camera b. 1 unit BBIP Fino 14 Camera Microtek Take IT S3 7 units damaged or lost c. 2 units AACC d. 3 units ALSC

2 working 15 External HD small capacity 60 GB 3 units CBBS 1 damage

16 External HD large capacity 500 GB 1 unit Working NACA

1. AACC 17 Router 3com / Internet hub 2 units Working 2. LSC‐CF/CBBS

18 External DVD Burner LG 1 unit Damaged suggestion: write‐off

a. 1 unit BBIP Busong 19 Power Stabilizer SAKO SVC ‐ 2000 VA 3 units Working b. 1 unit BBIP Fino c. 1 unit AACC

a. 1 unit LSC‐CF 6 Working 20 UPS Mitsui 10 units b. 1 unit BBIP Busong 4 broken c. 1 unit BBIP Fino

21 Water dispenser Uchida 1 unit working AACC

22 Filing cabinet Lion 1 units Good AACC

23 Fan 1 unit Working AACC

24 Satelite Phone Sony Ericsson 1 unit Yet being used Given by ADB; Return or Transfer to ?

25 Paper Shredder Pro Tech 1 unit Working AACC

ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT APPENDIX 7d HANDOVER OF AACC & EQUIPMENT PROCURED OFF BUDGET BY NACA

ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT APPENDIX 7e. RETURN OF FURNITURE & OFFICE EQUIPMENT BORROWED BY NACA CONSULTANTS FROM BRR SATKER

The consultants procured computers and office equipment, including filing cabinets, using off-budget ETESP funds. However, all furniture was on loan from BRR Satker and had been procured by them using ETESP funds on-budget. The consultants rented cars and motorcycles throughout (2005-2009) and did not procure any vehicles.

Explanatory email:

----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Coutts To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] ; 'Sena De Silva' ; 'CV Mohan' ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 4:16 PM Subject: Re: ADB ETESP FISHERIES - CONSOLIDATION/FINALISATION - MOVE OFFICE

Pieter Smidt Head, PMO/EMS ADB NAD & Nias

Pieter,

I would like to inform you that with effect from 1 April 2009, ADB ETESP NACA Fisheries consultants have moved out of the large Blower office in Banda Aceh.

Furniture and office equipment purchased by Satker with on-budget ETESP funds and previously on loan from BRR to ETESP NACA consultants has been returned. The scanned handwritten handover documents are attached for PMO/EMS and NACA records. We are still chasing the ex-Satker Pak Iqbal to obtain a more formal hand back document.

The core management team of ETESP Fisheries is now located at a temporary office in White House, part of the Green Paradise Hotel complex in the Ajeun Jeumpet area of town.

Richard Coutts ADB ETESP Fisheries Team Leader

Appendix 8 ADB ETESP FISHERIES – FINAL SUMMARY OF ALL TRAINING ON & OFF BUDGET NACA FISHERIES CONSULTANTS & BRR FISHERIES SATKER SEPTEMBER 2005 – MARCH 2009 YEAR/TRAINING THEME Location Duration No. Cost Other outputs* Comment No.days Trainees Rp. YEAR 2006

DIPA 2006 and 2006L

Training reports Training is aimed to improve technical knowledge in crab fattening and assist the village group to prepare their plan for a small Crab fattening Banda Aceh 17‐18/11‐06 40 35,839,000 scale crab fattening project.

Training reports Training of DIU in environmental monitoring 14‐ of sub‐projects according to GOI/ADB Environmental monitoring Banda Aceh 15/12/06 17 127,815,000 guidelines

Training reports Workshop (meeting) of BMPT members (active and non active members) for information/idea gathering to re‐ BMPT meeting Banda Aceh 12/9/2006 105 99,806,000 establish/strengthen the BMPT institution.

Training reports Training for seaweed farmers improving skills in seaweed culture; supporting Pulo Aceh, 14‐ implementation seaweed farming project in Seaweed farming Aceh Besar 15/12/06 20 66,655,000 Pulo Aceh, Aceh Besar.

Training reports Technical and management training for Cage culture for Aceh Barat 13‐ farmers in Aceh Barat involved in ADB ETESP district Meulaboh 14/12/06 23 tilapia cage culture project implementation.

Marine cage for Simeulue 17‐ Training fish farmers in Simeulue involved in district Simeulue 18/12/06 27 151,519,000 ADB ETESP marine cage culture projects..

Training reports Training of tambak brackish water aquaculture farmers in better management practice Brackish aquaculture for 14‐ following ADB ETESP pond rehabilitation Banda Aceh and Aceh Besar Aceh Besar 15/12/06 25 projects in selected districts.

Training of tambak farmers in better Brackish aquaculture for management practice in brackish aquaculture, Aceh Utara, Lhoseumawe 17‐ strengthening ADB ETESP pond rehabilitation and Bireun Lhokseumawe 18/12/06 21 35,839,000 projects in selected districts

Training of fishers from 11 ETESP districts Fishing gear building, 7‐ 410,692,000 improving technical skills in fishing gear operating and maintenance Aceh Besar 8/12/2006 44 building, operating and maintenance

9‐ Training of fishers from 11 project districts Basic safety training Aceh Besar 10/12/2006 44 improving technical skills in basic safety at sea.

Training of fishers from 11 project districts Boat building, operating 13‐ improving technical skills in fishing boat and maintenance Aceh Besar 14/12/2006 44 building, operating and maintenance

5‐ Panglima Laot Banda Aceh 7/12/2006 174 219,254,000 Training of Panglima Laot from NAD.

Training reports Technical and management skill training for farmers in Aceh Besar and Aceh Utara who are Crab culture for Aceh Besar beneficiaries of ADB ETESP crab culture and Aceh Utara Aceh Besar 6 /12/2006 20 project. 75,000,000 Training of tambak farmers in better management practice in brackishwater aquaculture, supporting beneficiaries of ADB Brackish‐water aquaculture ETESP pond rehabilitation projects in Aceh for Aceh Besar Aceh Besar 12/13/2006 20 Besar.

22/12/ Training in milkfish nursery operations to Milk fish nursery Aceh Besar 2006 7 improve farmer’s technical skill.

Training grouper nursery management to Grouper for Aceh Besar Aceh Besar 12/23/2006 3 improve farmers’ technical skill.

Hatchery for Aceh Besar, Training hatchery management to improve Pidie and Aceh Utara Aceh Besar 12/23/2006 8 technical skills

Technical and management skills training of farmers in Pidie who are beneficiaries of ADB Crab culture for Pidie Pidie 1/20/2007 16 ETESP crab culture project.

Training of tambak farmers in better management practice in brackishwater Brackish aquaculture for aquaculture, for beneficiaries of ADB ETESP Pidie Pidie 12/14/2006 72 pond rehabilitation projects in Pidie.

Training of tambak farmers in the better management practice in brackishwater Brackish aquaculture for aquaculture for beneficiaries of ADB ETESP Aceh Utara Aceh Utara 12/17/2006 51 pond rehabilitation projects in Aceh Utara

2007 DIPA 2007 and 2007L

12‐13 DIU training workshop Banda Aceh March 2007 44

Training reports and Training on improving processed fish quality Acah Utara, documentations and business management supported by ADB Pidie and 30 Nov – 22 ETESP Fisheries. Conducted swakelola by Fish processing Bireuen Dec 2007 25 116,770,500 SATKER BRR ADB Perikanan 2007

NACA PACKAGE 4 Training for ETESP Aceh Besar Training reports 11,592,000 Implemented by Ujung Batee aquaculture supported aquaculture and Aceh 8‐Feb‐07 69 centre (Sugeng Raharjo) villages Utara Training for ETESP Training reports 6‐Apr‐07 supported aquaculture Pidie and 24,455,000. Implemented by Ujung Batee aquaculture January 150 villages in Pidie and Lhokseumawe centre (Sugeng Raharjo) 2008 Lhokseumawe Small business training for Cancelled potential ice plant Nias and Nias n/a 15 operators on Nias and Nias Selatan Selatan Training reports, presentations, the groups registered to Training and certification of the industry 17,181,000 home based fish processing Banda Aceh 4‐Jul‐07 24 department and Completed as direct payment by NACA business (women/men) one group have successfully improved their market. Schools Mangrove Training reports, 55,800,000 Awareness Campaign in Lhokseumawe 14‐Aug‐07 200 presentations and Completed, Unsyiah (Bp. Muhammad) Lhokseumawe documentations

SONAR MAPPING Lampulo, GPS navigation training for fishers of Lampulo, GPS Sounder training Banda Aceh 1 day 39 100,000 Banda Aceh (work together with AGDC) Lampulo, GPS navigation training for fishers of Lampulo, GPS Sounder training Banda Aceh 1 day 54 100,000 Banda Aceh (work together with AGDC) Lampulo, GPS Sounder training Banda Aceh 1 day 24 200,000 Training at Sea Conference Kuala Lumpur 1 day ? 2,000,000 MapAsia Conference 07 Meeting with Panglima Laots and captains from surrounding area to discuss needs Needs Assessment Lhoong 1 day 48 500,000 assessment, future development Meeting with Panglima Laot and TNI from Sigli area to discuss needs assessment, future Needs Assessment Sigli 1 day 4 500,000 development Meeting with Panglima Laot and Teupins, DKP from surrounding area to discuss needs Needs Assessment Pulau Aceh 1 day 14 400,000 assessment, future development Meeting with Panglima Laot, Kota, Panglima Laot, Teupins from on Pulau Wei to discuss Needs Assessment Pulau Wei 1 day 26 500,000 needs assessment, future development Indonesian Society for remote sensing, Needs Assessment Banda Aceh 1 day 50,000 International Workshop Meeting with Panglima Laots from surrounding area to discuss needs Needs Assessment Calang 2 days 3 2,000,000 assessment, future development

2008 DIPA 2008 and 2008L Workshop Management Training reports and and hand over assets of 21‐ photo ADB ETESP Fisheries Banda Aceh July 2008 100 39,892,000 documentations Conducted by BANDOU ACHA

Training reports and Assisting fish processors in Simeulue villages photo who have been supported by ADB ETESP‐ documentations Fisheries village grant scheme to improve the Simeulue 16‐17 April quality of their product. Conducted by Simeulu fish processor processor 2008 20 49,900,000 BANDOU ACHA

Assisting fish processors in Lhokseumawe 15‐16 villages mainly women improve the quality of

Lhokseumawe Fish Augustus processed fish. Conducted by CV. INFOTECH processor Lhokseumawe 2008 25 49,850,000 BUILDING

5‐7 Training reports, Training on BBM operation and management presentations and Gunung Sitoli, November for Nias ADB ETESP Fisheries supported BBM photo BBM management training Nias 2008 6 60,000,000 managers and employees. documentations. Training reports, Training emphasizes on seaweed processed presentations and products for seaweed farmers/house wives in 7‐8 photo Nias. It is intended to cover small quantity of Gunung Sitoli, November documentations. seaweed production in Nias as the alternative Nias post harvest training Nias 2008 20 50,000,000 market.

Training reports, Training on improving efficiency of PPI, TPI 10‐12 presentations and and Fish market operation ensuring Nias Farmers/Fishers November photo sustainability of its operation and uses in long training Nias 2008 7 80,000,000 documentations. run.

Training reports, Technical training on tilapia culture methods presentations and for ADB ETESP Fisheries supported project in 28‐30 photo Aceh Barat. Improving farmer's skills on November documentations. technical tilapia farming and business Tilapia culture training Aceh Barat 2008 20 25,000,000 management.

NACA PACKAGE 4 Period 10‐ Training reports, Seaweed training in Nias Nias and Nias presentations, list Completed; Kalimajari (NGO from Bali) and 3 Feb‐ to April 459 114,950,000 and Nisa Selatan Selatan of attendances and separated contracts for VSTs 2008 photos

Training reports list On hands brackish water Period 25 of attendances and Lahokseumaw 6 groups 15,777,000 Conducted as technical assistant for farmers farming assistance in Feb to May photos e (50) by Ujung Bate staff Lhokseumawe 2008

NACA PACKAGE 40

Training reports, Conducted by NGO Kalimajari. Seaweed farm Nias and presentations ,list production/marketing April‐August 147 256,290,000 of attendances and Due to seaweed growth problem during, phase II Nias Selatan photos training implementation is rescheduled and adopted according to the seaweed growth

Training reports and Completed and directly implemented by 24‐25 April Simeulue grouper nursery Simeulue 10 17,300,000 photos NACA. 2008

Training reports, presentations, documentations, Directly implemented by NACA Nias, Nias May‐ hand book of Grouper hatchery (BBIP), Date of contract: 1 May 2008 Selatan and December 243 746,750,000 grouper farming in nursery and farmers cage and Standard Simuelue 2008 Training is being continued, trainers contract Operation have been extended to respond to technical Procedure for support requirements from marine cage Busong BBIP grouper farming and Fino and Bsuong BBIP..

Aceh Jaya, Training reports, list Training ongoing. Hands on training is being Brackish water pond Aceh Besar, of attendances and conducted by District Aquaculture specialist (shrimp & milkfish) – BMP July‐ Pidie, Bireuen, photos distributed in Aceh Besar, Bireuen and Aceh and quality production December 2800 546,000,000 Utara together with TPDs. Lhokseumawe capacity implementation 2008 and Aceh assistance Utara

Training reports, 29‐30 School mangrove presentations list of Aceh Jaya, Aceh Besar, Pidie, Bireuen, Bireuen November 150 79,800,000 awareness campaigns attendances and Lhokseumawe and Aceh Utara 2008 photos

Training reports,.8 Implemented by local NGO SAKA. presentations,0 list of attendances0. and School mangrove 7‐8 June Pidie 150 photos 0 awareness campaigns 2008 0 0 70,536,600

Training reports, technical training will continue to December; Aceh Utara, presentations, good season with good price for crab fattening October‐ Crab fattening training Aceh Besar, 250 120,280,000 documentations December Pidie, Biuren and hand book of crab fattening techniques Training reports, Implemented by: BBRPBL Gondol presentations list of attendances and Date of contract: 2 June 2008 photos Date of completion: 23 July 2008

June‐ July BBIP staff training Gondol 4 2008

93,600,000

Village extension training 32 Training reports,9 Implemented by BBIP Ujung Bate Aceh Utara, 26‐29 May presentations,. list

Aceh Besar, 2008 of attendances2 and Date of contract: 8 May 2008 Pidie, Biuren photos. 5 0 Date of completion: 9 June 2008

64,589,000

Green Conference Banda Aceh 2‐3 July Photos Directly implemented by NACA. 6,420,000 Exhibition 2008 documentations

Gondol Training reports, Implemented by: BBRPBL Gondol BBIP staff to Gondol phase presentations and 16 June‐15 84,600,000 Date of contract: 17 September 2008 II 3 photo July 20084 documentations Date of completion: 23 November 2008

Training reports, Nias, Nias presentations and Selatan, photos Implemented by: NACA by hiring a individual Simuelue, September‐ trainer Business management Pidie, Bireun, December 500 training 88,300,000 Date of contract: 17 September 2008 Aceh Utara, 2008 Lhokseumawe, Date of completion: December 2008. Aceh Besar

Nias and Nias Selatan Nias and Nias November Cancelled due to no replacement of died 8 27,500,000 farmers trip to Medan Selatan 2008 grouper fingerlings by supplier.

Livelihood Service Centres for Capture Fisheries Initial IT Computer: Word, Centralized: 6 Days 32 46,580,000 Pre & Post Test, Pre tests scores @ 45% correct answers; Spreadsheets & Internet Report, Attendance Post tests scores @ 73% correct answers given Unsyiah‐ list, & Photos Darusallam to multiple choice questions Computer Lab

Banda Aceh

Initial Database Use Lampulo 1 Day 32 4,640,000 Attendance list & Needed skills and understanding to support Training Photos fish price collection activities Center

BRR Community Contract Lampulo 1 Day 40 12,784,700 Attendance lists & Training provide by both Project Staff and BRR Execution & Reporting Training Photo Staff in attendance Center

Radio Communications Lampulo 1 Day 28 4,000,000 Photos Part of Panglima Laot Induction Ceremony – afternoon training Training Center

SONAR MAPPING Meeting with Panglima Laots from surrounding area to discuss needs Needs Assessment Lhokgna 1 day 7 400,000 assessment, future development Meeting with Panglima Laots from Meulaboh Meulaboh ‐ area to discuss needs assessment, future Needs Assessment Aceh Barat 2 days 17 2,500,000 development Meeting with beneficiaries of GPS sounder and Panglima Laot Pusong (Lhokseumawe), Lampulo, Panglima Laot Calang, Panglima Laot Sabang, Needs Assessment Banda Aceh 1 day 53 300,000 and Panglima Laot Pulo Aceh Meeting with Government/Military officials Pulau Wei 2 days 6 1,000,000 Presentation and meeting with TNI Lampulo, GPS navigation training for fishers of Lampulo, GPS Training Banda Aceh 1 day 38 Rp0 Banda Aceh (work together with BPPP) GPS Sounder installation training Lhokseumawe 1 day 5 200,000 GPS Sounder installation training GPS Sounder installation Calang, Aceh training Jaya 1 day 5 5,600,000 GPS Sounder installation training

Meeting with Panglima Laot Lhok Krueng Aceh (Banda Aceh), Panglima Laot Sigli, Panglima Laot Meureudu, Panglima Laot Bireuen, Panglima Laot Lhokseumawe, Panglima Laot Lampulo, Calang, and Panglima Laot Lhoong Saney Needs Assessment Banda Aceh 1 day 40 300,000 regarding Livelihoods Service Centers Meeting with Fish Handling and Hygiene and Sanitation Government/Military Lampulo, training for fishers of Lampulo (work together officials Banda Aceh 1 day 35 0 with DKP) Calang, Aceh GPS Sounder training Jaya 5 days 5,600,000 GPS Sounder training Lampulo, GPS Sounder training for the fishers of GPS Sounder training Banda Aceh 1 day 27 100,000 Lampulo, Banda Aceh Team Leader Conference Banda Aceh 1 day presented Rp0 Aceh Green Conference Meeting with Panglima Laot Lhok Krueng Aceh (Banda Aceh), Panglima Laot Sigli, Panglima Laot Meureudu, Panglima Laot Bireuen, Panglima Laot Lhokseumawe, Panglima Laot Calang, and Panglima Laot Lhoong Saney, Panglima Laot Pulo Aceh, and Panglima Laot Lampulo, Sabang regarding Community Based Partnership Banda Aceh 1 day 47 250,000 Bathymetric Survey and illegal fishing

students Aceh International Workshop on Disaster

had posters Conference Banda Aceh 1 day presented, 2 500,000 Recovery 2009 NACA PCKAGE 40 Shrimp and Fish Hatchery Aceh Besar, 23 February 18 171,561,500 Training reports, The training conducted in cooperation with Training Aceh Jaya, – 14 March presentations list of BBAP Ujung. The training is intended to Pidie, Bireuen, 2009 attendances and introduce technologies in fish hatchery as the Aceh Utara ( 20 days) photos. alternative of shrimp hatcheries. Tilapia Farming, Packaging Aceh Barat and 2 February – 534 223,107,500 Training reports The training is conducted directly by NACA

and Marketing Training Aceh Jaya 16 March including materials ADB ETESP Fisheries with technical supports 2009 and documentations, from BBAT Suka Bumi. The training is intended leaflet tilapia farming to provide practical training in tilapia farming, in cage, Leaflet marketing and live packaging. tilapia farming technique in pond, Leaflet live transport technique, Leaflet tilapia nursery technique.

Training at Lampung Marine Lampung 21 February 1 25,575,000 Training reports The training is held in BBRPBL Lampung. The Fish Culture Centre (BBPBL) – 4 March including training provides first‐hand, practical for 2009 presentations and knowledge and help develop skills in marine Manager of Marine Fish training fish hatchery management BBIP. Hatchery (BBIP) Busong, documentations. Simeulue Training on Responsible Aceh Besar 9 February – 55 111,375,000 Training reports The training is conducted directly by NACA Lobster Collection, and Aceh Jaya 28 March including ADB ETESP Fisheries with technical supports Fattening and 2009 presentations and from Lombok Mariculture Development Marketing training Center. documentations. Environmentally Training improves lobster collectors and safe lobster awareness and skills for responsible lobster diving poster; collection and safe diving as well as live Leaflet of lobster transport technique. The training introduce collecting newly technologies in seed lobster collection technique, Leaflet using trapping devices and lobster peurulus of lobster fattening grow out. technique, Leaflet of lobster holding technique Assistance on co‐ Aceh Besar, 1 January – 101 70,000,000 Training reports Capacity building supports for ADB ETESP management of ADB ETESP Pidie, Bireuen, 31 March fisheries supported infrastructure managers Fisheries supported Aceh Utara, 2009 on infrastructures Lhokseumawe, Entrepreneurship, Production management Aceh Barat, and marketing Aceh Jaya, Business Plan and assets management and Simeulue, Nias maintenance and Nias Selatan

Brackish water pond (shrimp Pidie and Aceh 1 January – Training reports and & milkfish) – BMP and quality Besar 31 March photos production capacity 2009 implementation assistance Livelihood Service Centres for Capture Fisheries

IT Computers: Word follow Lampulo 1 Day 3 No costs Report & Photos Follow up training for the 3 Panglima Laot up Livelihood Officials in attendance Service Centre

Follow Up Radio Lampulo 1 Day 33 Report, Attendance Follow up training for Aceh Besar: Lampulo and Communications on SSB & lists & Photos Lhoong in attendance VHF Training Center 267,500

Follow Up Radio On‐Site: Sigli 1 Day 19 Report, Attendance Follow up training for Sigli – Pidie in attendance Communications and IT Livelihood lists & Photos Computers (combined) Service Centre 1,100,000

Navigation & Mapping On‐Site 1 Day 35 Report & Photos LSC fisher groups, Marine Police, DKP & TNI staff in attendance LSC Peudada ‐ 2,015,000 Bireuen

IT Computer & Radio Follow On‐Site 1 Day 17 Report, Attendance LSC fisher groups and Marine Police in up (combined) list and Photos attendance LSC 1,727,500

Mereudu – Pidie‐Jaya

Navigation & Mapping On‐Site 1 Day 15 none All LSC Fisher group members in attendance

LSC Mereudu – 2,620,000 Pidie‐Jaya

IT Computer & Radio Follow On‐Site 1 Day 22 Report, Attendance LSC Fisher groups & Marine Police in attendance up (combined) list & Photos LSC Peudada ‐ 1,167,500 Bireuen

IT Computer & Radio Follow On‐Site 1 Day 5 Report, Attendance All Panglima Laot Officials & LSC Facilitator in up (combined) list & Photos attendance LSC 737,500

Saney – Lhoong

IT Computer & Radio Follow On‐Site 1 Day 2 Report, Attendance Panglima Laot and LSC Facilitator in attendance up (combined) list & Photos LSC 1,952,500

Calang – Aceh Jaya

Navigation & Mapping On‐Site 1 Day 35 Report, Attendance LSC fisher groups, Marine Police, DKP & TNI staff list & Photos in attendance LSC 4,506,000

Meulaboh –

Aceh Barat

Radio Communications On‐Site 1 Day 18 Report, Attendance All Lhok Panglima Laot Officials in attendance Follow up list & Photos LSC 2,727,500

Meulaboh – Aceh Barat

Navigation & Mapping On‐Site 1 Day 11 Report, Attendance LSC Fisher group members in attendance list & Photos LSC 4,185,000

Calang – Aceh Jaya

IT Computer & Radio Follow On‐Site: Sigli 1 Day 22 Report, Attendance LSC fisher groups, Marine Police, DKP & TNI staff up (combined) LSC list & Photos in attendance 3,202,000

Navigation & Mapping Lampulo 1 Day 19 2,042,000 Report, Attendance LSC Fisher groups from Pulo Aceh in attendance combined with Radio Comm. list & Photos Training Center

Navigation & Mapping On‐Site: 1 Day 60 2,950,000 Report, Attendance LSC fisher groups, Marine Police, DKP & TNI staff list & Photos in attendance Lhokseumawe

Database Use Centralized 1 Day 7 6,008,000 Report, Attendance LSC Facilitators from seven LSC sites in list & Photos attendance Lampulo LSC

Navigation & Mapping Lampulo 1 Day 22 3,850,000 Report, Attendance Lampulo LSC Fisher groups, LSC Facilitators, & list & Photos Marine Police in attendance Training Center

Navigation & Mapping On‐Site: Kota 1 Day 20 4,500,000 Report, Attendance 10 Sabang Panglima Laot Officials, plus 5 Marine combined with Radio Comm. Sabang list & Photos Police, plus 5 DKP staff in attendance

SONAR MAPING CBBS

Peudada, GPS Sounder training for fishers of Peudada, GPS Sounder training Bireuen 2 days 35 900,000 Panglima Laot Lhoks of Bireuen, and DKP GPS Sounder training for the fishers of Meureudu, Panglima Laot Lhoks of Meureudu, GPS Sounder training Meureudu 1 day 19 900,000 and DKP Meulaboh ‐ GPS Sounder training for fishers of Meulaboh, GPS Sounder training Aceh Barat 2 days 35 900,000 Panglima Laot Lhoks of Aceh Barat, and Navy Calang, Aceh GPS Sounder training Jaya 1 day 11 500,000 GPS Sounder training for the fishers of Calang GPS Sounder training Lhokseumawe 1 day 8 500,000 GPS Sounder and navigation training GPS Sounder training for fishers of Sigli, Panglima Laot Lhoks of Sigli, Marine Police and GPS Sounder training Sigli 1 day 22 700,000 DKP GPS Sounder training for the fishers of Lampulo, Lampulo, Panglima Laot Lhoks of Pulo Aceh, Panglima Laot GPS Sounder training Banda Aceh 1 day 16 100,000 Lhoks of Aceh Besar, and Police of Pulo Aceh Lampulo, GPS Sounder training for the fishers of Lampulo, GPS Sounder training Banda Aceh 1 day 11 100,000 Banda Aceh GPS Sounder installation GPS Sounder training for the fishers of training Lhokseumawe 10 days 60 1,800,000 Lhokseumawe, shipyard workers Lampulo, GPS Sounder training Banda Aceh 1 day 19 100,000 GPS Sounder training Meeting with Fishers of Lampulo and Marine Lampulo, polices ‐illegal fishing and development of Partnership Banda Aceh 1 day 75 100,000 future partnerships Meeting with Panglima Laots from surrounding area to discuss opportunities assessment, future Opportunities Assessment Banda Aceh 1 day 5 100,000 development

ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT

APPENDIX 9 ETESP Fisheries Socio-Economic Survey 2008

Financial and Economic Analysis of Sub Components SC1, SC2, SC3, and SC4

Late 2008 ETESP NACA Fisheries consultants undertook a rapid stakeholder/beneficiary survey in 2008 and was able to make a summary assessment of the socio economic impact of BRR ADB ETESP for sub components SC 1 Community Empowerment, SC 2 Capture Fisheries, SC3 Aquaculture and SC 4 Fisheries Infrastructure.

SC1, SC2 and SC4 each had 241, 36 and 54 activities respectively at the time of the survey.

The principal indicators set for each of these activities were the number of beneficiaries. Table 1 below identifies the beneficiaries achieved each sub component. These include direct as well as upstream/downstream beneficiaries. For each sub component, the number has been 17,862 (Sc 1), 1,414 (SC1), 3,664 (SC 3) and 8,258 (Sc 4). The number of female beneficiaries was estimated at 6,400.

On the basis of the US $32 million spent in the support program, the projected annual value added (plus profits) generated from each subcomponent is also shown in Table 1. This is equivalent to US $6 million per annum.

Total production generated from aquaculture and capture fisheries sub sector activities was estimated to be 11,000 tons.

Table 1: Summary economic indicators by component

Total beneficiaries Value added Sub component Tonnes (Col 2) (Rp million) Community empowerment 17,862 35,188

Small-scale capture 1,414 4,503 1,000 fisheries

Small-scale aquaculture 3,664 15,451 10,000

Small-scale fish landings 8,258 and post harvest facilities

Sub component 1: Fisheries livelihoods village grants

Summary of project outputs by economic activity

Two hundred and forty one (241) communities received village livelihoods grant assistance via community contracts for the restoration of livelihoods planned with their participation. The beneficiaries largely included groups requiring support in the following areas: boat rehabilitation, small-scale construction, provision of fishing gear and support inputs, fish processing and fish trading. The numbers of beneficiaries per kelompok are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2: Summary of BRR ADB ETESP fisheries related village livelihoods grant activities.

Average Number of Total beneficiaries Small-scale Processing (%) Fish Other village group groups fishing (%) trading (%) size < 30 28 534 68% 9% 9% 14%

30-60 87 3,680 56% 19% 18% 7%

60-100 84 5,551 49% 36% 12% 3%

100-150 30 3,045 52% 31% 12% 5%

150+ 12 2,290 52% 26% 13% 9%

Total 241 15,100 55% 25% 13% 7%

Source: ADB ETESP data base

The number of direct women beneficiaries in this sub component was 3,775. The number could be increased by up to 2,400 (FTE) with women workers supporting husbands in small- scale fishing, either for fish drying, or cleaning fishing nets.

Case studies

Economic and livelihood benefits

From case studies of 11 fisheries related SC 1 village livelihoods grants (Table 3), the average income per beneficiary per month was recorded at Rp 1.97 million. This represented an increase in pre tsunami earnings of 43%. Of the sample, there was only 1 case of a reduction in income reported.

Table 3: Case study of BRR ADB ETESP fisheries village grant economic indicators

Group Contract number Location Activity s change Av No. Group Group Group tsunami tsunami tsunami neficiary income / income / month pre pre month income/be Beneficiarie month post post month SPK.0300/BRR - small-scale Samatiga, Rp 4.9 1 464652/K/XII/200 78 fishing, trading Rp 480 m Rp 380 m -20% Aceh Barat m 6 & boat docking

SPK.4.2670/BRR - Panta Raja, Light boat (for 2 57 42.8 71.3 1.25 +67% ETESP.ADB/X/20 Pidie purse seining) 07

SPK.4.2686/BRR - Sampan tiga, Krupu 3 19 19 25.6 1.6 +60% ETESP.ADB/X/20 Pidie processing 07

SPK.4.2607/BRR Small boat - Muara Tiga, 4 22 fishing (hand 2.4 5.6 2.8 133% ETESP.ADB/X/20 Pidie line) 07

SPK.0330- Blang 38/BRR - Mangat, 5 35 Fish trader 4.5 6.0 0.2 33% 464652/K/XII/200 Lhokseumaw 6 e

SPK.4.2491/BRR Peukan - Fishing/proces 6 Bada, Aceh 69 5.5 6.2 0.1 11% ETESP.ADB/IX/20 sing/trading Besar 07

SPK.4.2687/BRR- Desa Paya 7 ETESP.ADB/X/20 Baro, shrimp 36 Shrimp nets 32 80 2.2 150% 07 nets

SPK.4.2424/BRR- Muara Batu, Fishers/fish 8 ETESP.ADB/X/20 165 209 389 2.4 86% Aceh Utara drying /traders 07

SPK.3.193.1/BP- Small-scale Jeunieb, 9 BRR- 47 fishing/fish 62.6 98.1 2.1 57% Bireun 890331/VII/2008 drying/trading

Floating SPK.S3.038.4/BR raft/small- R- Setia Bakti, 10 48 scale 24 67.2 1.4 180% ETESP.ADB.P/III/ Aceh Jaya fishing/process 2008 ing/trading

SPK.4.2420/BRR- Meuraxa, Tuna powder 11 ETESP.ADB/VIII/2 44 2.4 9.2 2.1 282% Banda Aceh processing 007

SPK.5.3177/BRR- Small-scale Teluk 12 ETESP.ADB/IX/20 28 fishing, ice 14.0 28.0 1.0 100% Belukar, Nais 07 freezers

SPK.5.3181/BRR- ETESP.ADB/IX/20 Small-scale 13 07 Fowa, Nias 21 11.6 46.2 2.2 300% fishing

SPK.5.3132/BRR- Wau, Nias Small-scale 14 ETESP.ADB/IX/20 24 43.2 151.2 0.5 233% Selatan fishing 07

Sample 693 953 1,363.6 1.97 43% totals

Source: ADB ETESP site visits, December 2008

Some specific benefits recorded were as follows:

Rehabilitated or new smaller boats had been provided with replacement gear and in some cases small inboard engines. The boats (Groups 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, and 14) were able to restore their living, but with the new equipment, some were able to travel longer distances to sea. In these cases, all fishing groups (kelompoks) started re- investing in new gear, and were making of plans for replacement boats. In one case, in Picture of fishermen with net (Kelompok Bagi Beusaban) one case (Group 1), only some of the boats ‘We now share fishing costs and sell collectively to the Toke, which gives us stronger selling power’ had been successful, causing the kelompok to fall apart, but within

this group 50% of the fishers were still successful. In all these cases, small-scale fishermen were partially dependent on their families to process fish and clean nets. In others, rehabilitated smaller boats in Nias and Nias Selatan (Groups12,13,14), had moved from subsistence coastal fishing to commercial hand lining for higher value species. Villagers, both men and women, in Teluk Belukar, Nias had used some of the community grant to buy chest freezers to supply the fishermen. This allowed the fishers to preserve high quality small tuna and groupers for sale in the main urban markets. Rehabilitated sampan (small boat) in Fowa village,

The small inboard engine (5.5 hp) now allows us to travel up to 6 miles offshore when before we fished only in the bay. (Teluk Belukar, Nias)

Fish processing has provided an economic activity for women (Groups 3 and 11). Community grants were able to draw in unemployed women from the village, train them and extend their processing to local sales to shops. One group (11) has secured export certificates for abon ikan to Malaysia, and has participated in a local business exhibition.

Picture of lady processor (Ibu Nursadi) ‘The Lady processor salting fish, Samalanga traders come to us, when before we were selling on the road side’ and ‘more women want to join our group’.

Fish trading has helped restore the traders’ livelihoods with baskets, fibre storage boxes, boots, knives and working capital (Groups 5, 8 and 10). The fish traders were able to use the working capital to establish themselves, reducing working capital debt liabilities, and found that the new facilities (fibre storage boxes) improved the quality of their fish, with some significant benefits in price. The other notable benefit was that the kelompok had agreed a selling network, thereby reducing competition, and would regularly hold joint meetings on prices and quality. Some traders had moved from bicycle to motorbike.

Other activities (Group 2) included small light boats that had been rehabilitated. These boats work at night with the purse seines catching small pelagic fish (ikan teri). They attract the fish and share one third of the catch with the boat. The group had seen a big increase in their earnings, the corresponding increasing dependency of the local fleet on light fishing, as their own catches had fallen. Picture Fauzi Hasballah’s kelompok light boat ‘With the extra money that we are now making, we are rehabilitating older light boats, and expanding the kelompok’.

A summary of livelihood benefits recorded from the groups included:

• Increasing income; • More regular income; • Sending children to school; • Sustaining family expenditure to levels comparable with the rise in the cost of living; • Improved family diet (now 3 meals per day as opposed to the customary 2) ; • Decorating the house; • Resettlement in coastal community • Strengthening social linkages within the village; • Buying motor bikes • Investing in the kelompok assets.

Socialization

The kelompok structure had been retained in 12 out of the 14 cases examined. In 2 of these cases, the kelompoks had established a village cooperative, and another 5 villages were seeking to do the same.

The one problem case involved the selection of owners for three, two man boats from a group of 60. The issue was resolved by dividing the group into three sub kelompoks and a buyer chosen from within the group. The boats were bought at 50% of the original community grant and the monies distributed amongst the 19 family members.

Component performance

It is noted that the case studies represent a snap shot of working examples of kelompoks. In ETESP Site Advisers categorised the level of success in each district.

Table 4: Assessment by SA of BRR ADB ETESP village livelihoods grant performance.

Excellent Successful Partly Unsuccessful Total (%) (%) successful (%) (%) Aceh Besar/Banda Aceh 24% 48% 20% 8% 100%

Pidie 12% 12% 12% 65% 100%

Bireuen 3% 3% 0% 94% 100%

Aceh Utara/Lhokseumawe 20% 80% 0% 0% 100%

Aceh Jaya 0% 71% 29% 0% 100%

Aceh Barat 15% 32% 26% 26% 100%

Simuelue 0% 21% 79% 0% 100%

Nias 16% 37% 37% 11% 100%

Nias Selatan 0% 25% 55% 20% 100%

Weighted average 10% 38% 26% 26% 100%

Source: ETESP Fisheries Site Advisors

Table 5: Summary of strengths, weaknesses and opportunities of BRR ADB ETESP village grants

Strengths Weaknesses

• Strong leadership skills from the kelompok group; Poor community facilitation • A willingness to coordinate amongst the villagers Poor community leadership • Transparency in distribution of villager benefits • Adequate distribution of funds within the Divisions within the communities kelompok, smaller kelompoks having a greater chance of success Kelompoks too large • Good facilitation by ETESP staff, DIU and DKP Failure to provide business support training • The provision of business training • The expansion of activities Opportunities Threats

• More flexibility on the size of grant depending on Village rivalries and jealousies (“the haves and have the number of beneficiaries (Rp 200million was nots”). too restrictive in some cases);; • Real hands on facilitation using personnel with appropriate business development skills; • Greater attention to ensuring that the kelompok leaders to have the required management skills • As above, further mutual support and expansion of and within the kelompok

Conclusions:

The planned project outcome for this component is: ‘Coastal communities empowered to develop and manage their resources’;

The following conclusions are made:

• 241 fisheries related kelompoks were empowered to develop and manage their resources; • In 48 percent of cases the groups (Excellent and satisfactory), the kelompoks achieved the objective of restoring their livelihoods; • In almost all number of cases, the kelompoks increased incomes, thereby reducing poverty; • The size of village grant was in some cases too restrictive causing divisions within communities, and reducing the ability for some groups to optimize their performance; (but as a cash grant, the amount per person was actually quite high); • The opportunities for enhanced kelompok performance were dependent on strong leadership, willingness for the villagers to accept the socialization process, and good guidance.

Table 6: BRR ADB ETESP Village Grant sub-component evaluation

Partly High Successful Unsuccessful Weighting successful

Relevance 3 20%

Effectiveness 2 30%

Efficiency 2 30%

Sustainability 2 20%

Overall rating 1.9 Successful

Sub component 2: Fishing boats

Summary of project outputs by economic activity

One hundred and forty one (141) fishing boats in the size range 5 – 20GT were delivered by BRR ADB ETESP to beneficiaries, along with support equipment (fishing nets, GPS, fish finders, lights and fish boxes), and first period operating costs. The value added generated as a result of ETESP fishing boat support sub component is an estimated Rp 4.5 billion (Table 7). The number of beneficiaries are 1,414, including 1,142 direct fisher beneficiaries, 24 upstream beneficiaries (boat builders), and 248 downstream workers, including 225 women workers, and 23 Toke Bangku (middlemen/boat agents). This excludes 347 boat builders and 30 net makers4 active during the construction period.

From a sample size of 59 boats, the projected annual (2008/2009) catch from these boats for would be 624 tons on the West coast and 300 tons on the East coast.

Table 7: Summary economic costs and benefits for BRR ADB ETESP fishing boats

Size Average cost NPV (Rp million) IRR Projected fleet annual group Number (12% discount (%) value added (Rp million) (GT) (Rp million) rate)

5-7 GT 88 135.6 9.973 14% 2425.56

10 GT 18 179.5 34.89 32% 644.94

15 GT 21 365.6 25.99 10% 806.4

20 GT 14 794.2 31.6 7% 627.2

Total 141 - - - 4,503.8

GT – gross tons

Of the 141 boats completed, all were delivered within the period 2006 to 2008. Some problems were encountered with a small number of sub standard boats delivered by contractors which sub-contracted boat builders. In most cases, these issues were resolved following intervention from BBR Satker and ADB ETESP consultants.

Table 8: Summary beneficiaries for BRR ADB ETESP fishing boat construction

Fisher Upstream5 Downstream6 Total beneficiaries 5-7 GT 349 14 108 471 10 GT 88 4 19 111 15 GT 425 3 87 515 20 GT 280 3 34 317 Total 1,142 24 248 1,414

4 The contractors also paid the fisher beneficiaries and other village members to prepare the nets prior to operation. 5 Boat builders calculated in FTE to reflect rebuilding in 7 years. 6 Includes 225 direct women dependents

Case studies

Of the 25 boat projects, ETESP undertook an assessment of 10 kelompok groups operating. The evaluation examined five subject areas: economic (Table 9) outputs, validation of employment indicators (Table 7), livelihood benefits, sustainability, socialization processes and views on construction (Design, monitoring and delivery).

Economic and livelihood benefits

The results from the analysis reveal that beneficiary incomes have increased from pre tsunami levels by an average 9.9%, with fisher beneficiary average incomes of Rp 3.56 million/month.

Table 9: Case study of boat economic outputs

Group Contract number Location Activity % change Av ary No. tsunami tsunami tsunami tsunami month pre month month post post month Beneficiaries Beneficiaries Group income / Group income / income/benefici 5-7 Gross Tons

Arongan SPK.S2.3792/BRR- Lambalek & 1 8 Drifting gill net 16 28 3.5 75% ETESP.ADB/XII/2007 Meurebo,Ac eh Jaya

SPK.S.2.1190/BRR- Samatiga, 2 40 Drifting gill net 40 96 2.4 140% ETESP.ADB/VI/2007 Aceh Barat

SPK.S.2.1197/BRR- Panga, Aceh 3 24 Drifting gill net 27 36 1.5 33% ETESP.ADB/VI/2007 Jaya

Krueng SPK.S.2.1194/BRR- 4 Sabee, Aceh 24 Drifting gill net 9 26 1.1 192% ETESP.ADB/VI/2007 Jaya

SPK.S.2.1195/BRR- Teunom, 5 24 Drifting gill net 36 50.4 2.1 40% ETESP.ADB/VI/2007 Aceh Jaya

PL.83.12/ETESP- Tuhemberua 6 15 Drifting gill net 8.25 16.5 1.0 100% DKP/IX/2006 , Nias

Teluk Dalam 7 SPK.S.5.2572/BRR- and Lahusa, 9 Drifting gill net 36.0 54.0 6.0 60% ETESP.ADB/VIII/2007 Nias Selatan

Teluk 8 SPK.S.5.2971/BRR- Dalam, Nias 9 Drifting gill net 13.5 22.5 2.5 51% ETESP.ADB/VIII/2007 Selatan

Average (5-7GT) 2.15 77%

10 Gross tons

Johan SPK.S.2.1191/BRR- 9 Pahlawan, 40 Drifting gill net 111 164 4.1 47% ETESP.ADB/VI/2007 Aceh Barat

Group Contract number Location Activity % change Av ary No. tsunami tsunami tsunami tsunami month pre month post post month Beneficiaries Beneficiaries Group income / income Group / income Group income/benefici 15 Gross tons 47%

SPK.S.2.2946/BRR- Muara Batu, 10 80 Purse seine 140 112 1.4 -20% ETESP.ADB/X/2007 Aceh Besar

20 Gross tons -20% Kreung SPK.S.2.1186/BRR- Raya/Lamba 11 80 Purse seine 320 440 5.5 38% ETESP.ADB/VI/2007 do Lhoh, Aeh Besar SPK.S.2.1189/BRR- 12 Aceh Utara 80 Purse seine 120 90 1.1 -25% ETESP.ADB/VI/2007

SPK.S.2.1189/BRR- 13 Bireun 60 Purse seine 720 620 11.0 -8% ETESP.ADB/VI/2007

Average 387 397 5.9 +1% Source: ADB ETESP site visits, December 2008. Note: Simeulue vessels were handed over in December2008/ January 2009. It was therefore not possible to include them in the survey

The results reflect significant benefits from increased catches for West Aceh and Island fishers, which the respondents dedicated to larger sized boats, increasing the range of smaller boats previously used; the application of technology (GPS and fish finders), allowing for night fishing; improvements in fish quality as a result of use of fish boxes; and application of different gears (drifting gill nets). The fishers reported that the extended range of the boats and the gears used resulted in a marked difference in fish caught. Boats were now targeting higher value Spanish mackerel, yellow fin tuna, groupers and snappers. The boats were reported to be more stable than their predecessors. All West Aceh, Nias and Nias Selatan boats reported profits, and most were considering longer term builds in newer, and in some cases, larger boats. All fishers had also bought additional gears (lines) to cater for seasonal changes in fisheries.

The East Aceh fishers, who were beneficiaries of larger 20 GT purse seiners made the following observations: In all but one boat, catches had consistently fallen by around 30%; at the same time, some fish prices had increased by around 20-60%. Overall, the increase in average incomes from pre tsunami levels was 1%. However, this marginal increase in earnings reflects the fact that two kelompoks ran into debt. All East coast kelompoks were seeking to redress the lower catch rate by investing in Fish Aggregation Devices (FADs).

In the intervening periods, some fishers had worked on other boats (in non-Tsunami affected Langsa and Iddie), smaller local boats or were unemployed.

Some specific cases are highlighted below:

Pak Jafar of Kelompok Setia Bakti, Aceh Jaya (5 GT boat) (Group 4), comprising 7 boats with 21 fishers, increased earnings by 192% from preceding activity. All had fished before the Tsunami but on smaller 2 man boats. They remarked that the kelompok functions well together: “We are now one big happy family’. We go to sea together for safety and share information like we never did before”. The boat is much safer than anything we had before. Fishing inshore is difficult because of obstructions, but we can now fish for longer and throughout the night. The Fish finder and GPS have helped us work in areas that we would never have worked before and we are catching valuable fish. They propose that with the profits Pak Jafar ID, Sektia Bakti, Aceh Jaya: We made, the kelompok will build a new boat each are now one big happy family’. We go to sea together for safety and share information like year with the intention that each crewman we never did before becomes a ‘Pawang’ (Skipper). “Our boats are the envy of the village”.

Pak Nawawi, Johan Pahlawan (5 GT boat) (Group 6), Aceh Barat. Our catches are Kelompok Sama Tiga, Aceh Barat (5 GT boat) better with the new gill nets. We catch more (Group 2), comprising 8 boats with 40 fishers, high value fish which brings each of us increased earnings by 140% from preceding earnings of Rp 1.5 million per trip (in 7 days). activities. We can travel further and sell at distant With this money, I have bought my wife a markets (Lampolu). The kelompok functions well, but sewing machine, and myself a motor bike. We most importantly we are able to educate our families are now thinking of the years ahead, and safe Rp 200 000 / trip for a ne boat

Pak Amaruddin Ismael, Muara Batu, Aceh Utara (15 GT boat). Our catches have fallen by 30% from when we were fishing before the Tsunami, but we are grateful to ADB because we have moved from no work to now providing for our families. Times were very difficult after the Tsunami, and we had to rely on friends for support. Some of us were forced to work in Iddie so that we could keep our children at school, but can now return home to be with our families. We are now borrowing FADs from the Toke which will allow us to increase catches.

Pak Beji seki Nech. Desa Hilitobara, Nias Selatan. ADB supplied drifting gill nets, when we had traditionally used bottom long lines all year. This allowed us to diversify our catching in the ‘East season’. Our catch in this period changed to more tunas and flying fish, but our overall income for the period increased. We are now saving Rp 1million / month for a new boat.

Catch of Hilitobara boa, Nias

Pak Idris Ismael, Panta Raja, Pidie. Our catches have fallen because of a change in sea conditions. The weather seems to be rougher than previous years. Each boat operates as its own kelompok but we share information with the other boats, and fisher together. Nevertheless, we are grateful to ADB, some of us were unemployed.

The evaluation also identified 3 out of 14 20GT purse seine boats that had fallen into serious debt. These were from Suenadon and Lampaga7 (Aceh Utara). The delays were a combination of poor quality boats supplied by the contractor, a series of 3 poor fishing trips and rising debts. The three sub kelompoks decided to fix the problems on the boat. All had run up debts of Rp 100 million to the Toke. One of these boats was under the Pawang’s control but fishing from Lhoksemawe, another was fishing with the same sub-kelompok, but operating from Iddie, and the other had been surrendered to the Toke. Of the remaining 11 boats, 1 was operating successfully from Peudada, another was following the tuna shoals around North Aceh, but was reporting successful catches and good earnings, One boat was laid up in Jangka awaiting repairs, but there was a dispute between the kelompok beneficiaries and other members of the village. Eight other boats had been handed over (Lhoksemawe, Kreung Raya and Lambada Lhok) to the kelompok but were awaiting the operating expenses before starting fishing. The Pawang of these boats reported that they were happy with the ADB package, but there were some deficiencies in finishing which had been reported to BRR Satker.

7 Contract SPK.S.2.1188/BRR-ETESP.ADB/VI/2007

Two of the 20 east coast purse seiners Small 5GT boats ready to set sail for

A summary of livelihood benefits recorded from the groups included:

• Increasing income for fishers and other beneficiaries; • Fishers able to return to the village from distant fishing ports; • Generating income for spouses (through further fish processing and drying) • Sending children to school; • Improved family diet; • Strengthening social linkages within the village; • Donating to the mosque or church • Buying household items that can support alternative livelihoods • Buying motor bikes • Investing in the kelompok assets.

Socialisation

When asked about the socialization process in forming the kelompok, fishers, and their Panglima Lhok explained that meetings had taken place within the village, to decide on kelompok members. In all cases, the villagers selected disadvantaged fishers, and unemployed village members, and there were no identified cases of jealousies or rivalries. In one subsequent and isolated case, Jeunib, Jangka, the villagers had sought to seek ownership of the boat as opposed to the kelompok. The boat is presently laid up awaiting a resolution to the problem.

The positive lesson learned is that fishers appeared to have retained the kelompok structure as an entity to business operations. Most groups created a sub-kelompok linked to each boat. One group (Setia Bakti) had retained a joint kelompok of 7 boats.

Sustainability

West coast and Island fishing boats were achieving high catches. The increase in catch is attributed by the fishers to the ADB package allowing them to fish more efficiently. The BRR

ADB ETSP has resulted in a transition from heavily exploited inshore waters to near shore. This may have increased the pressure of certain near shore stocks such as snapper, groupers, mackerels and tuna. Pre- and post-Tsunami DKP boat statistics are very unreliable and it is difficult to gauge the sizes of the fleets pre and post tsunami. However, it is known that much of the initial reconstruction efforts in West Aceh were focused on construction of smaller boats. The expectation is that if anything, effort may have increased significantly in inshore waters and BRR ADDB ETESP assistance provided an opportunity to diversify to under exploited grounds.

In contrast, East Aceh has seen a reduction in fish catches. This may be as a result of many factors. However, observations from the evaluation, indicates that other donors were also active in the area. This may have led to an increase in capacity in some of the East Aceh landing sites. In Pante Raja, Pidie, 4 donors (including ADB) were active, and the size of the fleet increased from pre tsunami 40 boats to 52. A worrying sign from a conservation perspective is the focus on fish aggregating devices (FAD) to target tunas. IOTC has expressed concern over the use of FADs.

Boat Design, construction and delivery processes

The case studies provide a good indication of performance in the boat design, construction and handover process. The view of respondents was also clarified with the experiences of the Site Advisors and boat monitors. The table below represents a summary of collective views, identifying where appropriate, the specific issues raised by the respondents.

Table 10: Assessment of BRR ADB ETESP boat design, construction and delivery

Design Construction Handover/Delivery Comments (1) Some faults in finishing Partly successful (Weak decking, caulking Aceh Besar Excellent Successful (1) (2) and wood quality); (2) Awaiting operating costs (1) Boat specifications built Pidie Successful (3) Successful Successful with smaller capacity from other in the village (1) Problem with one boat Bireun Successful (3) Successful (4) Successful delivered in Jangka (1) Problems experienced with three out of boats 9. Visits restricted to two only, and Partly Aceh Partly Successful boats were not Successful Successful (5) distinguishable by Utara/Lhokseumawe (5) (6) beneficiary until very late in the process (2) Replacement of keels in Muara Batu (1) Problems encountered with specific contractors and Aceh Jaya Excellent Successful (7) Successful (7) (8) boat yards in Calang and Teunom (2) Awaiting operating costs No faults detected by Aceh Barat Excellent Excellent Excellent beneficiaries No faults detected by Nias Excellent Excellent Excellent beneficiaries Problems were experienced with vessels originally built in Calang. The interviews Nias Selatan Excellent Excellent Excellent covered vessels built in P Tello. No faults detected by beneficiaries Rating Successful Successful (2) Successful (2)

(2.6)

Source: ADB ETESP site visits, December 2008. Note Average scores greater than 1.6 and less than 2.9 are classified as ‘Successful’.

Problem issues identified by respondents related to contractor delivery of poorly finished boats. BRR ADB ETESP subsequently insisted on successful sea trials prior to the handover. However, for the most part most beneficiaries in each District felt that the process had been successful. The difficulty in the above definition is that generally successful performances were tarnished by a few specific cases.

Component performance

Table 11: summary of strengths weaknesses and opportunities of BRR ADB ETESP boat construction

Strengths Weaknesses

• Boat construction processes regarded as ‘as • Poor quality control applied by some contractors; excellent, in terms of design, mostly successful in • Some concerns about fully exploited stocks in terms of construction and design; some areas • Strong economic performance by fishing boats, • Weaknesses in donor/NGO/DKP boat construction especially in the 5-7 GT group, leading to certainty coordination by coordinating authority; of longer term sustainability; • Need for stronger dialogue and site demarcation • Significant economic and livelihood benefits; between donors and NGOs; • Socialisation / kelompok processes appears to • Operating grants were not successful in reducing have been highly successful; the linkages between intermediaries and • Few boats experienced changes in ownership / beneficiaries. However, this relationship is a kelompok membership since commencing traditional and generally non exploitative process operations. in Aceh • A small number of fishes fell into debt and relied on the toke as opposed to other credit schemes to support them Opportunities Threats

• BRR Satker/DKP strategic assessment of boat • As and when boats default they become needs pre tsunami vulnerable to take over; • Improved boat monitoring by beneficiaries and • Stock depletion with increases in efficiency of monitors; fishing boats post delivery (e.g. use of FADs). • Rigorous controls and strict penalties applied to contractor non performance; • DKP focus on gradual reduction in boat numbers, and evaluation of alternative livelihoods such as aquaculture. • Design of credit schemes to reduce dependency on middlemen

Conclusions:

The project outcomes for this component is ‘Capture fisheries restored to biologically and economically sustainable levels of effort and landings’;

The following conclusions are made:

• 141 fishing boats and 1,414 beneficiaries have benefitted from this subcomponent; • fisheries kelompoks have been empowered to develop and manage their own resources; • The boats are economically viable, and in most cases have contributed to a significant reduction in poverty levels and a strengthening in family livelihoods; • The sub component is sustainable with beneficiaries considering gradual re-investment strategies. This also suggests that the boat packages, with accompanying inputs, were successful; • The impact on the resources is unknown suggesting that DKP together with Panglima Laot needs to evaluate precautionary fisheries management strategies • The boat construction processes was successful, with limited problems experienced with contractor performance • Stronger donor coordination and consultation was needed during the period of beneficiary identification • The socialisation processes worked well

Table 12: BRR ADB ETESP fishing vessel construction sub component evaluation

High Successful Partly successful Unsuccessful Weighting

Relevance 3 20%

Effectiveness 2 30%

Efficiency 2 30%

Sustainability 3 20%

Overall rating 2.4 Successful

Sub component 3: Aquaculture

Summary of project outputs by economic activity

By the end of 2008, five thousand farmers and other community stakeholders had received assistance from ADB grants. Sixty four per cent of community grants were to tambak farmers, based in the Northern and Eastern districts of Bireuen, Aceh Utara and Pidie. Other beneficiaries included 48 shrimp hatcheries, located in the North eastern districts, 344 small scale Crab/Lobster/Milkfish fattening groups spread throughout Aceh, and other smaller scale community farmer groups on the West coast, comprising 42 tilapia community groups and 68 islands community groups (58 grouper and 10 seaweed groups). In the case of shrimp farms and hatcheries, ADB support was given to the restoration and improved practices, whilst other groups benefitted in part from restoration but more in the establishment of new alternative livelihoods.

The value added generated as a result of ETESP aquaculture support sub component is an estimated Rp 15.5 billion (Table 13). The number of beneficiaries (Table 13) are 5,619, including 522 upstream and downstream beneficiaries (input suppliers and middlemen). Women workers do not feature significantly in aquaculture activities, with the exception of seaweed, where they make up more than half of the total labour force.

The sample of beneficiaries per are summarized in Table 14.

Table 13: Summary economic costs and benefits for BRR ADB ETESP aquaculture

Size group Number No farmer of Average NPV (Rp IRR Projected Tons of units beneficiaries cost ha / million) (%) sector produced (1 unit = unit (12% annual 1 farm) discount value (Rp rate) added million) (Rp million)

Farms /cages

Shrimp/milkfish tambak 3,159 3,159 9.7 44% 3,806 Shrimp 450 t (3 cycles) Milkfish: 22.78 9,685 t

Grouper (2 cycles) 58 317 33.7 285 378% 432 70

Grouper nursery 1 5 52.05 6.5 164% 5.5

Tilapia 42 534 35.3 389.4 334% 722 396

Crab/Lobster/Milkfish 344 886 4.7 5.6 87% 123 fattening and nurseries

Seaweed (8 cycles) 10 129 3.61 4.023 91% 100 29.7 (dried weight)

Total 3,614 5,030 152 700 3,921

Hatcheries

Number No farmer of Average NPV (Rp IRR Projected of units beneficiaries cost / million) (%) annual unit (12% hatchery discount annual (Rp rate) value million) added (Rp million)

Shrimp hatcheries 48 48 166.4 40.8 16% 1,071.0

Grouper hatcheries 2 19 100.09 5,445 40% 4,015.0

8 Includes agro-input 9 Supported National ABN budget of Rp 3,950 million (BBIP Busung) and Rp 1,250 million (BBIP, Fino)

Total 50 67 266.4 585.3 5,086.0

Grand total 3,664 5,097 418 1,285 0 15,451

Table 14: Summary beneficiaries for BRR ADB ETESP aquaculture

Farmer and Upstream Downstream (Toke) Number of Total farm workers Input women suppliers engaged

Farms

Shrimp / milkfish 3,159 112 157 3,428 tambak

Grouper 317 23 40 340

Grouper nursery 5 Farmers already 5 listed

Tilapia 534 18 552

Crab/Lobster 886 25 911

Seaweed 129 4 100 133

Total 5,030 122 207 140

Hatchery

Shrimp 48 48 Tambak farmers 96 and toke already listed

Grouper 19 5 24

Total 67 53 120

Table 15: Case study of BRR ADB ETESP aquaculture economic indicators

Group Location No. Activity kgs/per Group Group Av % Benefic cycle income / income / income/ chang iaries cycle pre cycle post benefici e tsunami tsunami ary

Sh mil rim kfis p h

1 Bireun 322 Shrimp 93 1,0 Rp 231m Rp 391m Rp 1.2 -69% tambak 39 m

2 Aceh Utara 587 22 22 Na Rp (25 m) Rp (44 na 0 m)

Group Location No. Activity kgs/per Group Group Av % Benefic cycle income / (gross) income/ chang iaries cycle pre income / benefici e tsunami cycle post ary (Rp m) tsunami (Rp M)

Jasa Desa Cot 20 Tilpia 3.540 0 30,7 1,5 NA Maju Kumbang, Kecamatan Arongan, Kabupaten Aceh Barat

Bersatu Balefadorotuho, 6 Grouper 700 0 52.5 2,5 Kec. Lahewa, Nias

Saban Pasi Lhok, 3 Sea bass 1,100 16,5 0.9 Rasa Kecamatan Kembang Tanjong, Kabupaten Pidie

Duta Balefadorotuho 20 10 0 0.25 0.0125 Bahari Nias

Ikan Bawolawinda Nias 11 300 0 7.5 0.68 Todak Selatan

Group Location No. Activity PL/per Group Group Av % Benefic cycle income / income / income/ chang iaries (million) cycle pre cycle post benefici e tsunami tsunami ary

Bukhari Alue Mangki, 4 Shrimp 5.0 6.0 61,2 9.18 +53% Windu Kecamatan hatchery Gandapura, Kabupaten Bireuen

Case studies

Of the 3,159 tambaks ETESP had assisted in rehabilitation, ETESP undertook an assessment of 18 tambak groups (1,000 individual tambaks) in Aceh Utara and Bireuen, 1 hatchery in Bireuen, 1 grouper, 1 tilapia, 1 sea bass and 2 seaweed kelompoks. The evaluation examined five subject areas: economic outputs, validation of employment indicators, livelihood benefits, sustainability, socialization processes and views on construction (Design, monitoring and delivery).

Economics and livelihood benefits

Shrimp tambaks

The benefit following ADB ETESP assistance to shrimp tambaks was not only the restoration of the tambaks but also, improvement in productivity over the pre-tsunami production levels. Using BMP advice, farmers cited increasing yields of shrimp per cycle from pre tsunami

levels of 80 kg/ha to up to 300 kg/ha. The general trend has been an increase in shrimp volume produced by 40%. More notable successes were found in milkfish production, which had increased from 300kg/ha to around 1,400/ha. Farmers cited increased stocking densities, improved feeding regimes and quality testing of PL as the key reasons for improvement in production volumes. Farmers acknowledge that their incomes have increased with a transition from 2 to 3 cycles per annum but shrimp prices are lower now than they were before the tsunami.

As a result of the support and record what they say e.g Pak Suliman,kelompok udang bagus ‘we are now producing 150 kgs per cycle, my income is better and I can now afford to buy without borrowing from the toke bangku’

BMPs were cited has having improved farmer knowledge of the production processes. Farmers commented that they were regularly testing pH and salinity as well as monitoring for signs of disease. Farmers were restocking after 3 months, when they had previously waited 5 to 6 months. However, farmers still relied on the seed from toke bangku, as opposed to specific hatcheries, including those built by ADB ETESP. They cited concerns over water compatibility between the farm and hatchery as a reason for relying on their traditional toke linkages.

Other economic benefits cited were:

• Farmers had increased their levels of activity and were renting tambaks from others; • Removed reliance on capital purchases from the toke; • Improved transparency in prices offered because

A summary of livelihood benefits recorded from the shrimp farmer groups included:

• Partial increases in income had allowed farmers to send their children to at least one higher level; • Farmers felt that their status in the villages had improved, along with their ability to provide shrimp/milkfish for their neighbours and friends.

Aquaculture Livelihood support activities (Tilapia, grouper and others)

Both grouper and tilapia are seen as having generated a good source of additional income for community groups, but in some cases (tilapia), the outputs failed to reach their real production potential, producing around 30% to 50%. Nevertheless anecdotal evidence suggests that some tilapia groups are doing better than others citing particular success stories for tilapia in Setia Bakti and Panga. The lack of income for the group would appear to have resulted in the group sizes falling to half their original level.

Grouper would appear to have been a more successful venture than tilapia with community groups receiving up to Rp 2.5 million per member per cycle. This activity has generated higher incomes per beneficiary than most other activities.

Seaweed

There were contrasting experiences in seaweed cultivation. Table 3 showing the range of success experienced between the villages. Bawolawinda, Pulau Telo (Nias Selatan)

provides a good working example where farmers realised around Rp 7.5 million from the one cycle. This money was put into the community cash fund for re-investment. In contrast, Balefadorotuho failed to realise any appreciable earnings. On the whole, it can be said that the experiences of Nias Selatan were satisfactory, whilst those in Nias were poor, largely as a result of conflicts and poor organisation within the villages, compounded by an ‘ice-ice’ and moss attack. Early successful activities were in the sale of seed to other sites (BRR ADB ETESP and ADB COREMAP). Seed prices reached very high levels of Rp 25,000/kg.

There were 129 beneficiaries from seaweed activities. Women account for more than half the workforce and play a significant role within the production and marketing structure. The women were actively involved in construction, culture/planting (especially in tightening the seeds), and periodically cleaning the seaweeds. The women will also become involved in the post-harvest handling and up to marketing as and when the production systems are fully implemented.

Hatcheries

Hatchery producers would appear to be producing approximately 5 million PL per cycle, which represents a 40% increase over and above pre tsunami activities. More importantly, owner, and other beneficiary income, has increased as result of improved production, better prices and a reduction on operating costs (as a result of the introduction of a single brooder system). BRR ADB ETESP has also provided training in disease checking procedures, and sustainability is supported with ongoing biosecurity technical assistance provided by Ujung Bate.

Socialization

Shrimp tambaks

When asked about the socialization process in forming the kelompok, the feedback was mixed. Some farmers expressed satisfaction that group structures had improved relationships between farmers, and had allowed for collective purchasing from suppliers. However, in other cases it was stressed that the formation of the groups had been in haste in order to facilitate access to BRR ADB ETESP support. This had led to disquiet among group members with the selection of specific leaders who were deemed insufficiently trustworthy. The Dea of Jangka Alue U had changed their group management, after tambak reconstruction and received improved performance from the new group leadership, which facilitated agro-input distribution.

Aquaculture Livelihood support activities (Tilapia, grouper and others)

The socialisation experience was mixed across other livelihood aquaculture activities. The grouper groups would appear to have worked well as a community, but are said to require more advice to facilitate longer term sustainability. The tilapia groups did not appear to work well with activities undertaken by a few individuals as opposed to the group as a whole. The other livelihood support activities (fattening) would appear to have mixed experiences.

Seaweed

With one exception, village groups worked well. Farmers often worked together to resolve problems. In Teluk Limo, the group was able to work together to construct a longline unit to

replace the failed bottom planting method. However, conflict within groups occurred due to weak community facilitation and lack of information. In Balogia Village there were two managers within the group because of lack of trust but this issue was resolved through group dynamics and a change in management structure.

Sustainability

Shrimp tambaks

Farmers had placed a strong focus on restocking with an increased number of cycles per annum, showing commitment to increasing production. The extremely good returns from milkfish had probably improved their financial security, as opposed to shrimp, which has suffered from poor international product prices. Farmers also indicated a lower reliance on middlemen to support capital purchases, but this may also be because most farmers’ primary capital inputs were supported by BRR ADB ETESP Fisheries agro input grants. These assets would still appear to be functioning well.

Aquaculture Livelihood support activities

Most systems would appear to be sustainable, but the slow initiation of training for tilapia farmers has resulted in an inability to realise full production potential in this sector. Areas cited as important for training are disease control, crop husbandry (Feeding and environmental control), net repairs and construction and marketing. Training in disease management is also cited as an important issue for the grouper sector.

Seaweed

Based on collective decision-making, seven of the ten villages target villages have given their commitment to continue the implementation: Balefadorotuho, Seriwau Daratan, Bawo Analita Saeru, Teluk Lomo, Bawolawinda, Balogia and Hiligeho Sugawa. The three Nias villages appear likely to discontinue their activities. Of the committed villages, the farmers retain a strong commitment to provide seeds to other target villages, even supplying free seed where the village (Balogia) encountered problems. The internal dynamics has seen seeds exchanged between all the participating villages.

The producers have also established links with a private Jakarta based producer (PT Gumindo Perkasa Industri) who appear committed to strengthening the trading linkages with the ETESP and ADB COREMAP sites.

Hatcheries

Sustainability seems assured with improved profitability and sustainability is supported by ongoing biosecurity technical assistance provided by Ujung Bate.

Design, construction and delivery processes

Shrimp tambaks

The socialisation and technical training support processes on tambak reconstruction empowered the farmers ability to monitor the work during tambak reconstruction. However, in a large number of cases, farmers expressed distrust of their group leadership preferring to

have received direct financial benefit from BRR ADB ETESP. Farmers also expressed satisfaction with the performance of the contractors.

It was acknowledged that programme staff were on hand to support the design and implementation of the rehabilitation activities, but farmers felt that there was confusion between DIU, SA and other support staff over implementation rules. In this respect it was stressed that there was an inadequate hierarchy for decision-making.

Aquaculture Livelihood Support Activities

The livelihood groups were responsible for the construction of their own facilities. This appears to have been competed to the satisfaction of the SA and technical experts.

Seaweed

Design issues seem to appear to have departed from the original recommendations of line systems, with the trainers advocating bottom systems. The seed budget was allegedly insufficient, compounded by the need to obtain more seeds to cater for the restoration process following ‘ice ice’ disease thought to originate from contact with freshwater.

Hatcheries

Hatchery construction followed a pre agreed design, and DIU supervised and ADB ETESP closely monitored implementation.

Table 15: Assessment of BRR ADB ETESP fish farm design, construction and delivery

Case study Design Construction Handover/Delive Comments ry

Calok The design unclear Good Successful Successful boundary of village Jangka Alue U There are about 2 farmers are not satisfied, less supervise/monitoring from Partly ADB/BRR directly to the Successful successful Successful field. Other non shrimp Work was undertaken by activities Successful Successful Successful the groups concerned Seaweed Seaweed trainers advocated a change to Parttly bottom systems which successful Successful Successful proved unsuccessful Shrimp hatcheries Completed according to Successful Successful Successful design specifications

Component performance

Table 16: summary of strengths weaknesses and opportunities of BRR ADB ETESP boat construction

Strengths Weaknesses

Farmer beneficiaries were identified without The socialization processes were not seen to work well (Shrimp, tilapia), with considerable mistrust of the leadership

problems. and haste in the creation of group structures.

Design studies (shrimp) (Map, BoQ, and The support structures to facilitate good group organisation Technical Drawing) were of good quality. were inadequate.

BMPs were designed and implemented and The field staff (DIU, SA, Bina Swadaya) were unclear on the worked well (shrimp) rules for implementation, and support staff roles were unclear

The level of continuous support (SA, DIU) were Its was felt that ADB activities were too widespread and more perceived as good resources could have been put into fewer sites

Some socialization processes led to increased Training has been lacking for some groups (fattening and bargaining power for farmers tilapia) with the result that production systems have not Seaweed socialization appears to have worked reached their full potential. well in 9 of the 10 seaweed villages and for grouper culture Disease problems encountered in seaweed cultivation

Women were actively engaged in nursery, line Some members of the group were lazy and became passive construction and seeding adding to the success members causing some internal conflicts. of the seaweed operations

Opportunities Threats

Much greater attention and time paid to the No training or inadequate training may affect the sustainability socialization process of some activities (tilapia)

Better management control, required during implementation

Conclusions:

The following conclusions are made:

• The farmers reacted well to the training processes and the BMPs for shrimp, and seaweed. Framers therefore appear highly likely to implement improved practices with the resulting benefits for domestic food security (milkfish) and with good export potential for shrimp and possibly seaweed; • However, training has been lacking for some groups (tilapia) creating significant problems for longer term sustainability; • More attention should have been paid to the socialization structure which proved problematic due to inadequate organization and supervision, with the processes rushed in order to facilitate fast access to rehabilitation funding; • Farmers appeared capable of supervising tambak reconstruction, but the quality and confusion of higher level supervisory support was seen as problematic. Farmers commented that greater should have been paid to the establishment of a management hierarchy with defined rules for implementation. • As and when farmers (grouper, tilapia and seaweed) implemented their own constructions, these appear to have been adequately completely.

Table 17: BRR ADB ETESP aquaculture sub component evaluation

High Successful Partly successful Unsuccessful Weighting

Relevance 3 20%

Effectiveness 2 30%

Efficiency 2 30%

Sustainability 3 20%

Overall rating 2.5 Successful

Sub component 4: Infrastructure

Summary of project outputs by economic activity

By the end of 2008, forty four (44) assets were delivered by BRR ADB ETESP to beneficiaries (Table 18), with a projected number of beneficiaries per asset. Table 19 takes a more detailed look at the distinction between target beneficiaries and actual beneficiaries based on evaluation assessment. The estimate total number of beneficiaries recorded for this sub component is 8,258.

Table 18: Summary economic costs and benefits for BRR ADB ETESP infrastructure investments

Average cost NPV (Rp Size group (GT) Number IRR (%) Target beneficiaries (Rp million) million) Landing site/Jetty 18 1,098.9 4,208 Fish market 3 553 518 Ice plant 4 937.4 15.0 15% 1,311 SPDN 9 365.3 49.0 32% 2,173 BBM 3 290.8 117.0 126% Cool dry room 1 133.4 1,418 Refrigerated ice lorry 1 525.0 308 Revetment 2 1,654.2 2,608 Total 44 - - -

Table 19: Summary beneficiaries for BRR ADB ETESP infrastructure (SC 4) construction

Actual beneficiaries Target Activity No of Visiting beneficiaries Fish Processing local vessels Total traders Workers fishermen (FTE)10

Johan Wall 1,024 500 150 200 20 870 Palawan

Ujung Drien TPI 408 630 15 5 650

Arongan L TPI 108 69 15 4 88

Teunom TPI 416 319 - 7 326

Panga TPI 200 237 2 239

Kreun Sabee SPDN/Fish market/ 120 318 20 3 10 351 refrigerated ice lorry

Leupung TPI 744 206 15 53 274

Lambada SPDN/Fish 241 160 7 167 Lhok market

Pante Raja Cool dry room 1,418 780 30 75 885

Mereudu SPDN 2,160 300 50 30 380

Jangka Small pier 780 98 5 103

Samalanga TPI 1,192 300 10 18 328

Pusong SPDN not stated 250 30 35 10 325

Plimbang TPI 220 200 6 206

Rancong TPI 200 200 7 207

Muara Batu Ice 1,304 400 30 10 16 456 plant/SPDN

Seunudoon TPI 1,316 60 7 67

Kota Batu Ice plant 404 75 12 3 5 95

Latak Ayah TPI/BBM 404 62 24 3 7 96

10 FTE = person days

Suka Karya TPI/BBM 744 120 48 12 20 200

Labuhan TPI/BBM 520 83 10 4 7 104 Bajau

Gunung Sitoli Ice plant not stated 55 20 9 81 165

Lahusa BBM 250 250 75 10 335

Tuhemberua BBM 170 170 30 15 215

Teluk Dalam Ice plant not stated 500 100 10 66 676

P Tello Jetty 450 360 55 15 30 450

Total TPI/Wall/Jetty 3444 317 298 159 4,208

Total SPDN/BBM 1,713 287 112 61 2,173

Fish market 478 20 3 17 518

Total Ice plant 1,030 162 32 87 1,311

Total Other 780 0 30 75 885

Overall total All11 8,258

Source: ADB ETESP site visits, December 2008

The infrastructure activities also support other BRR ADB ETESP activities, e.g. landing sites, and the provision of fuel for fishing vessels, ice for fishers and fish traders, and inland markets for assisted traders (muge)

BRR ADB ETESP landing site construction has benefitted 4,208 fishers and support workers (traders and processors). This excludes 360 site workers responsible for construction in the period 2006-2008. The expected economic benefits resulting from this activity are as follows:

• Improved access to fishing boats for discharging fish; • covered markets for the protection of fish from sunlight; • market premises for fish trading; • Improved product quality and price; • hall facilities to support net mending; • hall facilities to support meetings; • integration with other infrastructure activities

BRR ADB ETSEP SPDN/BBM has benefitted 2,173 fishers. This excludes 240 site workers responsible for construction in the period 2006-2008.The economic benefits from this activity include:

• the provision of fuel at lower cost; • Increase in the quality of fuel available; • Ease of access to fuel;

11 Not sum of above totals to avoid double counting

• the profit from activities to the kelompok/cooperative responsible for running the fuel stations.

BRR ADB ETSEP ice plants have benefitted 1,311 fishers. This excludes 20 site workers responsible for construction in the period 2006-2008. The economic benefits from this activity include:

• the provision of ice at lower cost; • ease of access to ice; • the profit from activities to the kelompok/cooperative responsible for running the fuel stations

The Province’s ice had traditionally been supplied by private entrepreneurs distributing from the main locations, Banda Aceh, Sigli, Bireun, Lhokseumawe and Meulaboh. In many cases there is a gap in the cold chain, or significant loss of ice during transport. In some cases, fishers will opt not to use ice resulting in fish deterioration.

BRR ADB ETSEP fish markets have benefitted 518 traders and fishermen. This excludes 40 site workers responsible for construction in the period 2006-2008. The expected economic benefits resulting from this activity are as follows:

• Improved access to consumers to fish; • Improved product quality, and price • covered markets for the protection of fish from sunlight; • market premises for fish trading; • integration with other infrastructure activities in the village (e.g. ice plants)

Case studies

Economic and livelihood benefits

Landing sites: At the time of the evaluation (End of November), only one landing site, Ujung Drien (Aceh Barat), had been handed over. More sites had been completed but were awaiting ‘hand over’ from BRR Satker. The community had started activities at one other site, Samalanga (Bireun), but some facilities were still locked and awaiting the keys from DKP.

Some observations from these two sites were noted: Apart from domestic activity, the landing sites were being used by both domestic fishermen and other non community fishers, from outside the region. Ujung Drien was being used by fishers from Calang; Samalanga by fishers from Lhokseumawe.

Fishers used the landing sites for net repairs. There was no evidence of fishers using the facilities to Fishermen using the ADB ETESP meeting hall in Samalanga discharge fish. The reason for this is that in both cases, there was no management structure in place, nor management MoU between the community and DKP. ETESP NACA consultants have subsequently followed up on this issue at many sites

SPDN and BBMs: None of the SPDNs had been completed by the end of 2008. One site, Muara Batu, was almost complete and a cooperative manager appointed. However, it was awaiting a license from Pertamina (the franchise fuel supplier from the national fuel monopoly).Two other sites Lambado Lhok and Pusong were nearing completion, but license issues were also believed to be problematic. The fishers however, were happy with these facilities identifying with the above economic advantages.

We estimate that cooperative members will save 20% of fuel costs. We were always relying on motor bikes bringing fuel. This meant that we would have to pay higher rates and pay Photo: Muara Batu SPDN the transport charge. Amaruddin Ismael, Pawang for one of ETESP’s fishing boats

The BBM is a new site, when before came from Gunung Sitoli, 50 miles away. We expect to sell 2.5 tons per day to 50 boats in the surrounding villages and make a 20% profit on sales .But most important is the quality of fuel. Before supplies from Sitoli were contaminated with kerosene, this damaged the engines. Now we know that everyone will want our fuel because it will be clean; Pak Yaarojai, nominated manager, BBM, Tuhemberua

Pangkalan BBM (Fuel depot) in Botolakha village in Tuhemberua, Nias.

Of the four ADB ETESP ice plants, one is nearing operation. The ice plant at Muara Batu will support a fleet of 30 vessels in the village, and is complimentary to other infrastructure activities (BRR ADB ETESP SPDN and DKP TPI) and fishing vessel construction and community grants (muge traders) in the area. The plant has been tested to operate at a capacity of 5 tonnes a day. A manager had been appointed by the Community, and operators and technicians were about to receive training from ETESP. However, the beneficiaries were awaiting hand over from BRR Satker. Beneficiaries, Mohammed (muge Kelompok Perikanan Gampong Mns Baro) commented ‘the ice will allow our fish to Photo: Ice plant, Muara Batu benefitting BRR remain fresh for longer, with this we get a ADB ETESP assisted fishers and Muge.

higher price, and can travel to more distant markets’.

The Calang Fish market is the only market that has been formerly handed over. It is now run by the local API traders association.

The Calang fish market is now operational with 12 work stations. The traders previously worked in an old market, destroyed by the Tsunami. The new Pasar Ikan is modern and much better than what we had before with muddy floors and poor working tables. Before we stayed open for four hours, now we start at 6 am and stay until 3 pm.

Photo: Fish Market (Pasar Ikan), Calang

Our fish is better, and housewives prefer buying fish here than in the old market. Pak Muslim API Chairman. He continued. Each vendor pays a maintenance fee of Rp 200,000 / month, and with this we can clean the market. Competition for the tables was fierce, and in fact the market was too small.

Traders at Calang fish market.

Pre selection Design and management

ETESP evaluated the state of use pre tsunami (Table 20), the level of community supports with a view to identifying critical issues to be resolved by Satker. The tests the presumption that BRR ADB ETESP’s outcome is Small-scale fisheries landing and post harvest facilities restored.

The following observations are made:

• Most sites were active before the Tsunami. ADB ETESP has improved the facilities for local fishers and traders; • Community support for these facilities is high, with one exception. Plimbang; • Utilisation of some sites is contained by access issues. The estuaries require dredging in 5 of the 18 landing site location (Arongan, Panga, Samalanga, Plimbang, Seunuddon); • In some cases there is community resistance to handover until access issues are resolved (Panga, Plimbang, Seunuddon); • BBMs represent a new facility (Nias and Nias Selatan). The provision of on site fuel is likely to make a price savings of around 20%, and to improve the quality of fuel available to the vessels.

Table 20: Site activity, completion, support and observations from selected sample of infrastructure sites

Pre tsunami Complimented by other State of Community support and

activity infrastructure support facilities completion observations

Landing site

Strong support as a birthing and net Boats would ADB Fishing kelompok/community mending station. but no active trading. Ujung Drien moor on the 100% grants Boats sell fish in neighbouring Johan bank. Palawan

Small landing Support, but small fisher grouping Arongan L jetty, no covered None 100% (88). Estuary access is problematic, market but just navigable.

Boats would ADB Fishing kelompok/community Teunom moor on the 40% Strong support with active trading. grants bank

Support, but boats forced to use Sama Previously tiga as estuary is silted and only Panga landed on the Community grants 85% navigable in Spring tides. Access to beach the TPI required dredging.

Previously TPI, Strong support with active trading, but Leupung destroyed in the FAO processing equipment 100% requiring warf which will be completed Tsunami by DKP

Strong support with some local Boats would trading. Already used by visiting boats Samalanga moor on the ADB community grants 100% from Lhokseumawe. Some difficulties bank with estuary access

The villagers gave the land and Boats would supported the initiative at the Plimbang moor on the ADB community grants 100% beginning. Now they are reluctant to bank accept the handover because of severe problems with estuary access.

Boats would Rancong moor on the ADB community grants 100% Strong support with active trading. bank

Boats would Support pre Tsunami, but low levels of ADB Fishing kelompok/community Seunuddon moor on the 100% economic activity. Severe problems grants bank with estuary access.

SPDN

DKP TPI, ADB ETESP Pasar / JICA Strong support. Awaiting Pertamina Lambado Lhok Yes Pasar Ikan, ADB Fishing licence. kelompok/community grants.

DKP TPI and Pasar, ADB LSC, Private Strong support. Awaiting Pertamina Pusong Yes Ice supply, ADB Fishing licence kelompok/community grants.

DKP TPI, ADB Ice plant, ADB Fishing Strong support. Awaiting Pertamina Muara Batu Yes kelompok/community grants. licence

BBM

Strong support because alternate ADB Fishing kelompok/community Lahusa No 100% supplies incur transport costs and are grants contaminated with kersosen.

Tuhemberua Strong support because alternate ADB Fishing kelompok/community No 100% supplies incur transport costs and are grants contaminated with kersosen.

Ice plant

DKP TPI, ADB SPDN, ADB Fishing Muara Batu Yes kelompok/fishing and trading 100% Strong support. Awaiting Training community grants.

Fish market

Previously in another location, ADB refrigerated transport lorry DKP Strong support. Well utilised, and Krueng Sabee 100% but poor TPI, IRC Ice plant. request for extension. condition

Source: ADB ETESP site visits, December 2008

ETESP also sought to confirm the state of hand over and transition to Community management (Table 21). This assessment follows BRR ADB ETESP’s preparation of guidelines for the handover process, and subsequent meetings between BRR Satker, the consultants and DKP. It is noteworthy that since the activities, some of the Local Government organizations had expressed reluctance to handover over asset ownership to the communities.

The following observations were made:

• There are only two cases to date of project hand over, Krueng Sabee, Calang, and Ujung Drien, Aceh Barat; • The is only one case where an MoU has been agreed between DKP and the beneficiaries (the cooperatives); • There are five cases where Managers have been selected by the Community, but with no sign of a hand over. One of the managers (Muara Batu SPDN was preselected by DKP); • Training has only been received in Nias and Nias Selatan (BBM). Ice plant training was about to commence for Muara Batu, and is arranged for ice plants in Nias Selatan and Nias.

Table 21 Summary management activities: Handover, MoU and training received

Management MoU in Manager Training Comments Handover place appointed received

Landing site

Ujung Drien Yes No No No No discussions with DKP to date

Arongan L No No No No No discussions with DKP to date

Teunom No No No No No discussions with DKP to date

Panga No discussions with DKP to date. No No No No Problems with contractors in not completing the site.

Leupung No No No No No discussions with DKP to date

Samalanga No No Yes No Manager seeks training

Plimbang Some discussions with DKP but No No No No community effused to manage

Rancong No discussions with DKP to date. No No No No Problems with contractors in not completing the site.

Seunuddon Some discussions with DKP but No No No No community refused to manage the facility.

SPDN

Lambado Lhok Pertamina resistant to licence No No Yes No approval

Pusong Yes, but Pertamina resistant to licence No No No not clear approval

Muara Batu Pertamina resistant to licence approval No No Yes No

BBM

Lahusa Village cooperative identified, No No Yes Yes Awaiting discussions with DKP

Tuhemberua Village cooperative identified, No No Yes Yes Awaiting discussions with DKP

Ice plant

Muara Batu Training No discussions with DKP to date No No Yes scheduled

Teluk Dalam Training Awaiting ice plant to be made No No Yes scheduled operational

Gunong Sitoli Training Awaiting ice plant to be made No No Yes scheduled operational

Fish market

Krueng Sabee Request DKP MoU incorporating ADB quality guidelines. Yes Yes Yes control training

Source: ADB ETESP site visits, December 2008

Component performance

Table 22: Summary of strengths weaknesses and opportunities of BRR ADB ETESP fisheries infrastructure rehabilitation

Strengths Weaknesses

• Small-scale fisheries landing and post harvest • No strategic assessment at district capacity and needs facilities restored (as opposed to localised assessments); • community support for the assets provided • improved community participation in the design of assets; • TPI access (problems with siltation of estuaries) • poor quality control applied by some contractors; • poor monitoring of some construction activities • DKP Handover processes slow to materialise; • stronger focus on community ownership/participation by DKP • Without following the BRR ADB ETESP MoU on asset management, no clear understanding on who does what in terms of asset maintenance and longer term reconstruction Opportunities Threats

• DKP/Multi donor strategic assessment of needs • Local Government using assets as a mechanism to (landing sites/markets, ice and fuel demand) collect income (retribusi) which disappear into non • Hand over process to follow BRR ADB ETESP fisheries local budgets; guidelines empowering the community, but retaining long term commitment to infrastructure maintenance in the future • Improved quality control standards to be implemented to TPI, markets and ice manufacturers • DKP / Ministry of works to commit to estuary dredging in sites affected • Demarcation of site activities between donors

Conclusions

Small-scale fisheries landing and post-harvest facilities restored (SC 4);

Table 23: BRR ADB ETESP Village grant sub component evaluation

High Successful Partly successful Unsuccessful Weighting

Relevance 3 20%

Effectiveness 2 30%

Efficiency 2 30%

Sustainability 2 20%

Overall rating 2.2 Successful

ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT

APPENDIX 10a – PHOTO GALLERY

Sub Component 1 ( Village Grant )

Fisher group assisted gears - Baet Aceh Besar – 06 Feb 2007

Woman group dried fish - Baet, Aceh Besar – 26 June 2008

Sub Component 2

5 Gt boat - Kula Bubon in Aceh Barat – 10 Jul 2008

ADB's Boats berthing in Port of Lampulo in Banda Aceh 4 Aug 2008

Sub Component 3

Hatchery in Bantayan in Aceh Utara 18 Jan 2008

Tilapia KJA in Lhok Kruet in Aceh Jaya, 05 Apr 2008

Sub Component 4

Cool Dry Fish Store Panteraja A.Pidie, 15 Feb 2008

PPI Plimbang Bireuen, 15 Feb 2008

Sub Component 5

A farmer planting manrove in Aceh Utar, 02 Nov 2007

Planted mangrove in Baet of Aceh Besar, 05 Aug 2007

Training

Onsite training approach has proven results during ADB ETESP fisheries seaweed project in Nias and Nias Selatan, 2008

Rotifer culture (juvenile fish food), practical fish hatchery training for operators in Ujong Batee, February – March 2009

ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT

APPENDIX 10b – PHOTO GALLERY

Capture Fisheries-Livelihoods Service Centre

Socialization for PL Lhokseumawe - combining the LSC-CF & CBBS 28 Apr 2009

Socialization for 8 PL District Lhok 04 Jul 2008

RDKK Training for 8 PL by consultant & Satker BRR Perikanan 24 Aug 2008

Panglima Laot & facilitator sign RDKK contract with Satker & consultant Oct 2008

Radio communication training for fishers Aceh Besar & bna 23 Jan 2008

IT central training Unsyiah for Aid district Panglima Laot 19-23 Sep 2008

CF-LSC Sigli Rehabilitation November 2008

GPS Training for Lampulo Fishermen & Facilitator February 2009

Post harvest Tuna processing training Meureudu 14 May 2009

MicroFinance - BPD dialog 17 Mar 2009

ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT

APPENDIX 10c – PHOTO GALLERY

Aquaculture Livelihood Service Centres (ALSC )

Activity in ALSC Samalanga, Bireuen – Farmers conversing by Skype over internet

with technical Team at AACC BBAP Ujong Batee

A shrimp farmer’s smile shows his successful introduction to

internet communication technology at the ETESP ALSC

ALSC farmers practicing the newly introduced internet technology to access the ALSC website (www.tambakaceh.org)

Aceh Aquaculture Service Centre (AACC)

One of the AACC services is to facilitate technical services for farmers

Hands-on training for improving farmer skills in fish hatchery techniques

ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT APPENDIX 11. LIST OF PUBLICATIONS No Category Title 1 District Concept District Concepts Notes-Aceh Barat-2006 2 Notes District Concepts Notes-Aceh Besar-2006 3 District Concepts Notes-Aceh Jaya-2006 4 District Concepts Notes-Aceh Utara-2006 5 District Concepts Notes-Bireuen-2006 6 District Concepts Notes-Banda Aceh-2006 7 District Concepts Notes-Lhokeseumawe-2006 8 District Concepts Notes-Nias-2006 9 District Concepts Notes-Nias Selatan-2006 10 District Concepts Notes-Pidie-2006 11 District Concepts Notes-Simeulue-2006 12 Sub-Project Appraisal Sub-Project Appraisal Report (SPAR) - General-2006 13 Report (SPAR)- Sub-Project Appraisal Report (SPAR) - Islands-2006 14 Sub-Project Appraisal Report (SPAR) - NAD East Coast-2006 15 Sub-Project Appraisal Report (SPAR) - NAD West Coast-2006 16 Sub-Project Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Aceh Barat-2006 17 Preparation Report Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Aceh Besar-2006L 18 (SPPR) Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Aceh Besar-2006 19 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Aceh Jaya-2006 20 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Aceh Utara-2006L 21 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Aceh Utara-2006 22 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Bireuen-2006 23 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Banda Aceh-2006L 24 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Banda Aceh-2006 25 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Lhokeseumawe-2006 26 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Nias-2006L 27 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Nias -2006 28 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Nias Selatan-2006L 29 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Nias Selatan-2006 30 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Pidie-2006L 31 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Pidie-2006 32 Sub-Project Preparation Report (SPPR)-Simeulue-2006 33 Initial Environmental Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Aceh Barat-2006 34 Examination (IEE) Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Aceh Besar-2006L 35 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Aceh Besar-2006 36 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Aceh Jaya-2006 37 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Aceh Utara-2006L 38 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Aceh Utara-2006 39 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Bireuen-2006 40 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Banda Aceh-2006L 41 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Banda Aceh-2006 42 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Lhokeseumawe-2006 43 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Nias-2006L 44 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Nias -2006 45 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Nias Selatan-2006L 46 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Nias Selatan-2006 47 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Pidie-2006L 48 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Pidie-2006 49 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)-Simeulue-2006 50 Monitoring Reports Inception Report-Nov 2005 51 1st Quarterly Report-Dec2005 52 2nd Quarterly Report-Mar2006 53 3rd Quarterly Report-Jun2006 54 4th Quarterly Report-Sep2006 55 5th Quarterly Report-Dec2006 56 6th Quarterly Report-Mar2007 57 Quarterly Environmental Report-Mar2007 58 7th Quarterly Report-Jun2007 59 8th Quarterly & Final Report-Dec2007 60 Inception Report (Package40)-Apr2008 61 Quarterly Report (Package 40)-Jul2008

62 Status Report-Jul2008 63 Design studies Design drawing for boats 64 Design study for the rehabilitation of small-scale shrimp hatcheries 65 Design study for the rehabilitation of aquaculture ponds and canals-Bireuen district 66 Design study for the rehabilitation of aquaculture ponds and canals-Aceh Besar district 67 Design study for the rehabilitation of aquaculture ponds and canals-Kota Lhokseumawe 68 Design study for the rehabilitation of small-scale fish landings (PPI/TPI) in Simeulue 69 Design study for the rehabilitation of small-scale fish landings (PPI/TPI) in Aceh Barat 70 Design study for the rehabilitation of small-scale fish landings (PPI/TPI) in Bireuen Design study for Green belt design and mapping in Neuhuen Village, Mesjid Raya, Aceh 71 Besar Design study for the rehabilitation of aquaculture ponds and canals- Aceh Utara district and 72 Kota Banda Aceh Design study for the rehabilitation of small scale fish landings (PPI/TPI) in Nias and Nias 73 Selatan Design study for the rehabilitation of small-scale fish landings (PPI/TPI) in Aceh Jaya and 74 Aceh Besar Design study for the rehabilitation of small-scale fish landings (PPI/TPI) in Aceh Utara and 75 Lhokseumawe 76 Sonar Mapping Phase 1: Design and monitoring study for fisheries community 77 Design Study for the rehabilitation of aquaculture ponds and canals Aceh Utara Design Study for the Rehabilitation of Aquaculture ponds & canals-Samudera subdistrict, 78 Aceh Utara Design Studies for the rehabilatation of small-scale fish landings (miniPPI) in Kembang 79 Tanjung, Pidie and Fishers' administration office in Panteraja, Pidie, Nias Selatan Sitoli 80 Design Study for the rehabilitation of aquaculture ponds and canals-Aceh Barat 81 Deep well survey and design in Ulee Lheue Design study for rehabilitation on civil works design drawings, specification and supporting 82 documents for the construction of fisheries in Lhokseumawe 83 Design Study for small-scale livelihood cluster on west coast (capture fisheries) 84 Design Study for small-scale livelihood cluster on east coast (Tambaks, Bireuen) 85 BBIP Rehabilitation and services recovery 86 Boat design (2006 budgets) 87 Shrimp hatchery design (1st & 2nd contract) 88 BPP office design, Aceh Jaya. BBIP drawings 89 DIPA 2007 budget design services 90 Fisheries infrastructure quantity surveyor, preparation of BOQ for Nias 91 Fisheries Infrastructure Draughtsman 92 Architect Consulting Services for Banda Aceh Provincial DKP building design- 93 Civil works draughtsman - CAD operator BBIP 94 Mapping services for aquaculture villages 95 Design for Kota DKP Banda Aceh office 96 Civil engineering design and drawing. Monitoring services 97 Survey for Seaweed Aquaculture Development Training Report and Report & materials for Crab fattening training in Banda Aceh; Aceh Utara; Aceh Besar; 98 Materials Pidie; Bireuen 99 Report & materials for Seaweed farming in Pulo Aceh, Aceh Besar; Nias and Nias Selatan 100 Report & materials for Tilapia culture for Aceh Barat district Report & materials for Marine cage training in Simeulue; Aceh Besar, Nias and Nias 101 Selatan Report & materials for Better Management Proctices for Brackish aquaculture in Aceh 102 Besar;Aceh Utara, Lhoseumawe, Bireun, Pidie Report & materials for Fish processing in Banda Aceh;Simeulue; Lhokseumawe; Pidie; 103 Bireuen, Aceh Utara 104 Report & materials for Mangrove Campaign in Lhokseumawe; Pidie; Bireun Report & materials for Mangrove and Coastal Vegetation Rehabilitation Training in Aceh 105 Utara; Lhokseumawe; Pidie, Bireuen and Aceh Barat 106 Report & materials for Simeulu Grouper nursery training 107 Report & materials for Extension staff training in Aceh Utara, Aceh Besar, Pidie, Bireuen 108 Report & materials for BBIP training in Nias, Nias Selatan, Simeulue 109 Report & materials for BBIP staffs training to Gondol 110 Report & materials for BBM management training in Nias 111 Report & materials for Nias post harvest training in Nias 112 Report & materials for Nias Farmers/Fishers training in Nias 113 Guidelines Guidelines for Subcomponent 1 ( 114 Guidelines for Subcomponent 2 115 Guidelines for Subcomponent 3 116 Guidelines for Subcomponent 5

117 Guidelines for Subcomponent 6 118 Guidelines for Subcomponent 7 119 Extension materials Poster: Mangrove Conservation Poster Version I 120 Poster: Mangrove Conservation Poster Version II 121 Poster: Pesticide Poster 122 Poster: Tambak BMP & Calendar 123 Poster: ETESP Fisheries Calendar 2008 124 Poster: Pond Book 125 Video: Shrimp BMP DVD 126 Fact sheet 1: Community Bathymetric Survey 127 Fact sheet 2: Managing Information 128 Fact sheet 3: River Clean Up 129 Fact sheet 4: Mapping biodiversity 130 Manual: Tambak BMP Booklet in English/ Bahasa Indonesia 131 Brochure: Grouper farming handbook 132 Brochure: Crab fattening handbook 133 Brochure: Lobster collecting technique 134 Brochure: Lobster fattening technique 135 Brochure: Lobster holding technique handbook 136 Brochure: Tilapia farming technique in cage 137 Brochure: Tilapia farming technique in pond 138 Brochure: Tilapia nursery technique 139 Brochure: Tilapia live packaging technique 140 Brochure: AACC introduction and operation

ADB ETESP FISHERIES COMPONENT COMPLETION REPORT APPENDIX 11b Publications Produced by Community Based Bathymetric Survey (Sonar Mapping Sub‐Project)

Already Produced and Distributed by May 2009 Amoun No Item Location t Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, 1 Bathymetric Map version 1 500 Peudada, Lhoksumawe, Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, 2 Fish Identification Handbook 200 Peudada, Lhoksumawe, Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Manual of Garmin 178 C Sounder translated 3 188 Peudada, Lhoksumawe, Lhoong into Bahasa Saney, Calang, Meulaboh Manual of Garmin 400i translated into 4 50 Lhoksumawe Bahasa Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, 5 IUU Log 235 Peudada, Lhoksumawe, Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh Video : Mapping The Sea Improving Banda Aceh, WOC 2009 ‐ 6 135 Livelihood Menado Handout of Fish Finder and Navigation 7 27 Banda Aceh Training Fact sheet #1 Community‐based Bathymetric 8 200 WOC 2009 ‐ Menado Survey Fact sheet #2 Panglima Laot Managing 9 100 WOC 2009 ‐ Menado Information

10 Factsheet #3 River cleanup project 1 Banda Aceh Fact sheet #4 Panglima Laot Mapping 11 100 WOC 2009 ‐ Menado Biodiversity Factsheet #5 Building a radio 12 communications network 1 Banda Aceh Senior Thesis : Inventory of Pelagic Fish Safrizal Putra, Syiah Kuala 13 8 Species in Fish Landing of Lampulo University, Banda Aceh Senior Thesis : Study of Fish Haul Using Anjar Sunandar, Syiah Kuala 14 8 Fishfinder With Purse Seine in Northern Aceh University, Banda Aceh Senior Thesis : The effect of GPS and Nur Meilina, Syiah Kuala 15 Fishfinder Toward Catch and Income of 8 University, Banda Aceh Fishermen in Lampulo Village Senior Thesis : Indenfication of Fishing Ground Based on GPS/Sounder Data That Nazaruddin, Syiah Kuala 16 8 Was Recorded By Artisanal Purse Seine University, Banda Aceh Vessel Fishing in Northern Aceh Senior Thesis : Bathymetric and Sea Surface Dwi Person, Syiah Kuala 17 Temperature Mapping Based on 8 University, Banda Aceh Measurement By Fishfinder in Northern Aceh Research Internship : Technical Usage of Fazlullah, Syiah Kuala University, 18 8 Fishfinder By Fishermen in Lampulo Village Banda Aceh Research Internship : Bathymetric Data Putradiansyah, Syiah Kuala 19 Collection By Panglima Laot Lhok Krueng 8 University, Banda Aceh Aceh, Lampulo, Banda Aceh International Workshop : Learning From The Recovery Community Based Bathymetric Survey Poster 20 1 and Reconstruction of Aceh and I Other Tsunamy‐Stricken Regions , December 2008, Banda Aceh International Workshop : Learning From The Recovery Community Based Bathymetric Survey Poster 21 1 and Reconstruction of Aceh and II Other Tsunamy‐Stricken Regions , December 2008, Banda Aceh 22 MapAsia International Conference 1 2007, Kuala Lumpur 23 Aceh Green Conference 1 October 2008 24 Indonesian Geotechnology Conference 1 July 30, 2008

The Abstract Submit to The Join Board of 1 March 30, 2009 Geospatial Information Societies (JBGIS) 25 Indonesian Geotechnology Conference 1 August 29, 2007 Customs and Traditional Law of Panglima 26 Laot According to Panglima Laot Annual 1 Banda Aceh Meeting Year 1992 Translated into English To be Produced before end June 2009 N Amoun Item Location o t Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, 1 Shrimp and Lobster Poster 300 Peudada, Lhoksumawe,

Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Lhoksumawe, 2 Shark Poster 300 Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Lhoksumawe, 3 Commercial fish Poster 300 Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Lhoksumawe, 4 Coral fish poster 300 Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Lhoksumawe, Lhoong Saney, Calang, 5 Commercial Size Classification of Tiger Prawn 400 Meulaboh, Samalanga, Jangka, Gandapura, Samudera Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Lhoksumawe, Lhoong Saney, Calang, 6 Commercial Size Classification of White Shrimp 400 Meulaboh, Samalanga, Jangka, Gandapura, Samudera Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Lhoksumawe, 7 Minimum Size Reproduction Poster 400 Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh, Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Lhoksumawe, 8 Bathymetric Map version 2 500 Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh, Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Lhoksumawe, 9 Current Map 500 Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh, Banda Aceh, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Lhoksumawe, 10 Unjam Map 500 Lhoong Saney, Calang, Meulaboh, Bathymetric Map of Banda Aceh, Pulo Aceh, and Banda Aceh, Sabang, and 11 300 Sabang Pulo Aceh 12 Bathymetric Map of Calang 100 Calang 13 Bathymetric Map of Lhoong 100 Lhoong 14 Bathymetric Map of Lhoksumawe 200 Lhoksumawe

APPENDIX 11c SUMMARY OF ALL PUBLICATIONS BY CAPTURE FISHERIES LIVELIHOODS SERVICE CENTRES TO 30 JUNE 2009

Date of Publication Publication Location Distribution Cost Outputs

August 2008 RDKK Guidelines 8 Panglima Laot, Satker Rp. 600.000,‐ RDKK Community BRR, ADB ETESP, NACA Contract Guidelines

September 2008 IT Module – 60 sets 8 Panglima Laot & PL Rp. 698.000,‐ IT Module: Word, official, 8 Centres Spreadsheet, Internet & Database

November 2008 Information for CF 7 centres : Lampulo, Rp. 350.000,‐ Poster A3 centre – 7 posters Saney/Lhoong, Calang, Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada & Pusong/Lhokseumawe

December 2008 Map of 8 Centres Project Office at Lampulo, Rp. 270.000,‐ Banner – map of 8 Training Room at Lampulo CF‐LSC 3 maps and CF Lampulo

December 2008 Radio 8 Centres & 2 Panglima Laot Rp. 271.000,‐ Manual book about Communication – 15 Sabang & Pulo Aceh VHF & long range Sets SSB

December 2008 Newsletter 1st edition 8 centres & 2 location : Rp.2.180.000,‐ Newsletter 1st – 2000 exp Lampulo, Saney/Lhoong, edition Calang, Meulaboh, Sigli, (Rp. 2.000.000,‐ for Meureudu, Peudada, printing and cost of Pusong/Lhokseumawe mailing 9 location)

Pulo Aceh & Sabang

January 2009 GPS guidelines – 100 8 Centres & 2 Panglima Laot Rp. 200.000,‐ Hardcopies of GPS sets Sabang & Pulo Aceh guidelines

March 2009 Newsletter 2nd 8 centres & 2 location : Rp.2.180.000,‐ Newsletter 2nd edition – 2000 exp Lampulo, Saney/Lhoong, edition Calang, Meulaboh, Sigli, (Rp. 2.000.000,‐ for Meureudu, Peudada, printing and cost of Pusong/Lhokseumawe mailing 9 location)

Pulo Aceh & Sabang

March 2009 Data Base Guidelines 7 LSC‐CF Facilitators Rp. 150.000,‐ Training and distribute 10 sets Sigli, Meureudu, Peudada, Pusong/Lhokseumawe, Lampulo, Saney/Lhoong & Sigli

March 2009 LSC‐CF infor included BPD Dialogue at Nangro Rp. 1.050.000,‐ BPD Dialogue with RDKK 8 centres Hotel with participant NAD presentation BPD Branch 50 sets

May 2009 Post Harvest Tuna 8 Centres Rp. 500.000,‐ Training and Processing – 100 sets distribute of modul

June 2009 Newsletter 3rd edition 8 centres & 2 location : Rp. 3.680.000,‐ In production; – 2000 exp Lampulo, Saney/Lhoong, printing end of Calang, Meulaboh, Sigli, (Rp. 2.000.000 for May 2009 Meureudu, Peudada, pinting, 500.000 for Pusong/Lhokseumawe designer cost and Will be distributied 180.000 for in June 2009 Pulo Aceh & Sabang distributing cost)

Annex 12

US$ US$

PCSS No No PCSS No PCSS Rp Forex Equiv Rp Forex Equiv Rp Forex Rp Forex 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2

74,995,000 9,217 8,136.60 74,995,000 9,309 8,056.18 75.0 9,217 75.0 9,309 74,996,500 9,345 8,025.31 75.0 9,345 74,976,630 9,234 8,119.63 74,976,630 9,281 8,078.51 75.0 9,234 75.0 9,281 74,963,880 9,225 8,126.17 75.0 9,225 199,925,610 9,055 22,079.03 199.9 9,055 74,719,845 9,217 8,106.74 74,719,845 9,309 8,026.62 74.7 9,217 74.7 9,309 29,995,000 9,217 3,254.31 29,995,000 9,309 3,222.15 30.0 9,217 30.0 9,309 91,530,465 9,351 9,788.31 91,530,465 9,303 9,838.81 91.5 9,351 91.5 9,303 105,121,200 9,351 11,241.71 105,121,200 9,281 11,326.49 105.1 9,351 105.1 9,281 37,499,790 9,091 4,124.94 37.5 9,091

199,548,720 9,421 21,181.27 199.5 9,421

G00425 199,763,000 9,030 22,122.15 199.8 9,030 G00425 199,878,180 9,030 22,134.90 199.9 9,030

29,995,000 9,234 3,248.32 29,995,000 9,309 3,222.15 30.0 9,234 30.0 9,309 49,616,500 9,387 5,285.66 49.6 9,387 199,893,888 9,421 21,217.91 199.9 9,421 29,995,000 9,217 3,254.31 29,995,000 9,309 3,222.15 30.0 9,217 30.0 9,309

74,953,680 9,217 8,132.11 74,953,680 9,309 8,051.74 75.0 9,217 75.0 9,309 74,957,760 9,225 8,125.50 74,957,760 9,281 8,076.47 75.0 9,225 75.0 9,281 74,978,925 9,309 8,054.46 75.0 9,309 29,990,000 9,217 3,253.77 29,990,000 9,309 3,221.61 30.0 9,217 30.0 9,309 74,972,805 9,372 7,999.66 74,972,805 9,345 8,022.77 75.0 9,372 75.0 9,345 29,998,000 9,217 3,254.64 29,998,000 9,309 3,222.47 30.0 9,217 30.0 9,309 29,995,000 9,217 3,254.31 29,995,000 9,309 3,222.15 30.0 9,217 30.0 9,309 74,983,500 9,345 8,023.92 75.0 9,345 29,995,000 9,217 3,254.31 29,995,000 9,309 3,222.15 30.0 9,217 30.0 9,309 74,989,000 9,345 8,024.51 75.0 9,345 74,971,250 8,975 8,353.34 74,971,250 8,974 8,354.27 75.0 8,975 75.0 8,974 74,971,250 9,338 8,029.05 74,971,250 8,974 8,354.27 75.0 9,338 75.0 8,974 74,978,500 9,303 8,059.60 75.0 9,303 74,995,500 9,345 8,025.20 75.0 9,345 88,000,000 9,338 9,424.36 88.0 9,338 253,000,000 9,338 27,095.05 253.0 9,338 193,600,000 9,338 20,733.60 193.6 9,338 15,000,000 8,975 1,671.31 15.0 8,975 49,990,200 9,303 5,373.56 50.0 9,303 73,394,000 9,091 8,073.26 73,394,000 9,309 7,884.20 73.4 9,091 73.4 9,309

123,035,500 9,091 13,533.77 123,035,500 9,309 13,216.83 123.0 9,091 123.0 9,309

123,606,500 9,408 13,138.45 123,606,500 9,303 13,286.74 123.6 9,408 123.6 9,303

134,639,000 9,091 14,810.14 134,639,000 9,309 14,463.32 134.6 9,091 134.6 9,309

4,999,979 9,314 536.82 5.0 9,314 220,000,000 9,338 23,559.65 220.0 9,338 50,000,000 9,338 5,354.47 50.0 9,338 108,271,215 9,328 11,607.12 108,271,215 9,302 11,639.56 108.3 9,328 108.3 9,302 99,722,000 9,408 10,599.70 99,722,000 9,281 10,744.75 99.7 9,408 99.7 9,281 149,991,000 9,314 16,103.82 150.0 9,314 269,000,000 9,225 29,159.89 269.0 9,225

G00425 38,395,350 9,020 4,256.69 38,395,350 9,028 4,252.92 38.4 9,020 38.4 9,028

137,500,000 9,338 14,725.57 137.5 9,338 90,750,000 9,338 9,718.88 90.8 9,338 264,000,000 9,338 28,273.09 264.0 9,338 111,430,500 9,408 11,844.23 111,430,500 9,302 11,979.20 111.4 9,408 111.4 9,302

18,000,000 9,338 1,927.71 18.0 9,338 4,999,800 9,309 537.09 5.0 9,309

4,998,000 9,282 538.46 5.0 9,282 4,995,900 9,281 538.29 5.0 9,281 117,893,000 9,408 12,531.14 117,893,000 9,281 12,702.62 117.9 9,408 117.9 9,281 4,998,000 9,282 538.46 5.0 9,282

199,997,520 9,341 21,410.72 200.0 9,341 68,047,500 9,408 7,232.94 68,047,500 9,309 7,309.86 68.0 9,408 68.0 9,309 4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 G00425 38,395,350 9,020 4,256.69 38,395,350 9,028 4,252.92 38.4 9,020 38.4 9,028 199,996,500 9,236 21,654.02 200.0 9,236 199,787,400 9,357 21,351.65 199.8 9,357 199,517,100 9,055 22,033.91 199.5 9,055

128,993,000 9,091 14,189.09 128,993,000 9,309 13,856.81 129.0 9,091 129.0 9,309 18,380,400 9,281 1,980.43 18.4 9,281 95,157,075 9,351 10,176.14 95,157,075 9,303 10,228.64 95.2 9,351 95.2 9,303 107,792,325 9,351 11,527.36 107,792,325 9,303 11,586.83 107.8 9,351 107.8 9,303 120,372,049 9,351 12,872.64 120,372,049 9,302 12,940.45 120.4 9,351 120.4 9,302

116,007,819 9,351 12,405.93 116,007,820 9,282 12,498.15 116.0 9,351 116.0 9,282

4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 4,998,000 9,309 536.90 5.0 9,309 199,930,200 9,363 21,353.22 199.9 9,363 200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 129,546,000 9,091 14,249.92 129,546,000 9,309 13,916.21 129.5 9,091 129.5 9,309

122,095,000 9,091 13,430.32 122,095,000 9,309 13,115.80 122.1 9,091 122.1 9,309

50,000,000 9,338 5,354.47 50.0 9,338 275,000,000 9,028 30,460.79 275.0 9,028 114,109,440 9,351 12,202.91 114.1 9,351 114.1 9,302 108,851,850 9,351 11,640.66 108,851,850 9,302 11,701.98 108.9 9,351 108.9 9,302 106,785,585 9,351 11,419.70 106,785,585 9,303 11,478.62 106.8 9,351 106.8 9,303 59,998,950 9,225 6,503.95 60.0 9,225 4,998,000 9,282 538.46 5.0 9,282 4,999,600 9,282 538.63 5.0 9,282 4,999,800 9,314 536.80 5.0 9,314 132,762,000 9,091 14,603.67 132,762,000 9,309 14,261.68 132.8 9,091 132.8 9,309

4,999,000 9,282 538.57 5.0 9,282 38,193,500 9,110 4,192.48 38,193,500 9,314 4,100.65 38.2 9,110 38.2 9,314 97,062,500 9,356 10,374.36 97.1 9,356

4,995,900 9,282 538.24 5.0 9,282

216,700,000 9,338 23,207.50 216.7 9,338 115,500,000 9,338 12,369.48 115.5 9,338 264,000,000 9,338 28,273.09 264.0 9,338

90,000,000 9,010 9,988.90 90.0 9,010 6,428,500 9,338 688.46 6.4 9,338

48,000,000 9,338 5,140.56 48.0 9,338 15,000,000 9,338 1,606.43 15.0 9,338

4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269

200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 G00425 199,984,260 9,034 22,136.85 200.0 9,034 199,899,600 9,028 22,142.18 199.9 9,028 136,600,000 9,028 15,130.70 136.6 9,028 199,010,000 9,028 22,043.64 199.0 9,028 199,950,000 9,028 22,147.76 200.0 9,028 199,400,000 9,028 22,086.84 199.4 9,028 197,740,000 9,028 21,902.97 197.7 9,028 196,668,240 9,028 21,784.25 196.7 9,028 199,510,000 9,338 21,366.53 199.5 9,338 199,500,000 9,028 22,097.92 199.5 9,028 172,817,580 8,980 19,244.72 172.8 8,980 200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 188,305,260 9,028 20,857.92 188.3 9,028 G00425 200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034 G00425 198,996,900 9,034 22,027.55 199.0 9,034 G00425 200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034 199,248,636 9,028 22,070.07 199.2 9,028 G00425 189,632,280 9,034 20,990.95 189.6 9,034 196,207,200 9,028 21,733.19 196.2 9,028 G00425 199,340,000 9,029 22,077.75 199.3 9,029 G00425 200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034

G00425 194,106,000 9,034 21,486.16 194.1 9,034 198,951,000 9,028 22,037.11 199.0 9,028 G00425 199,155,000 9,034 22,045.05 199.2 9,034 197,472,000 9,028 21,873.28 197.5 9,028 G00425 200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034 190,946,550 9,028 21,150.48 190.9 9,028 87,900,000 9,091 9,668.90 87,900,000 9,309 9,442.48 87.9 9,091 87.9 9,309

G00425 45,000,000 9,050 4,972.38 45.0 9,050 199,999,560 9,363 21,360.63 200.0 9,363 4,998,000 9,282 538.46 5.0 9,282 199,991,400 9,357 21,373.45 200.0 9,357 199,998,540 9,363 21,360.52 200.0 9,363 199,999,560 9,345 21,401.77 200.0 9,345 199,995,800 9,110 21,953.44 200.0 9,110 199,108,080 9,236 21,557.83 199.1 9,236 199,567,080 9,225 21,633.29 199.6 9,225 199,941,900 9,071 22,041.88 199.9 9,071 199,999,560 9,303 21,498.39 200.0 9,303 199,879,200 9,071 22,034.97 199.9 9,071 199,825,140 9,090 21,982.96 199.8 9,090

199,995,480 9,357 21,373.89 200.0 9,357 199,998,030 9,064 22,065.10 200.0 9,064 199,958,760 9,281 21,544.96 200.0 9,281 200,000,000 9,026 22,158.21 200.0 9,026 199,999,968 9,402 21,272.07 200.0 9,402

199,934,280 9,236 21,647.28 199.9 9,236 199,999,999 9,345 21,401.82 200.0 9,345 199,986,300 9,110 21,952.39 200.0 9,110 199,999,560 9,345 21,401.77 200.0 9,345 200,000,000 9,026 22,158.21 200.0 9,026

199,909,800 9,026 22,148.22 199.9 9,026 199,936,354 9,110 21,946.91 199.9 9,110 199,826,160 9,021 22,151.22 199.8 9,021 199,567,080 9,225 21,633.29 199.6 9,225

199,567,080 9,225 21,633.29 199.6 9,225

199,999,152 9,064 22,065.22 200.0 9,064 199,567,080 9,225 21,633.29 199.6 9,225 199,759,860 9,311 21,454.18 199.8 9,311 199,998,948 9,110 21,953.78 200.0 9,110 200,000,000 9,026 22,158.21 200.0 9,026 199,979,160 9,357 21,372.14 200.0 9,357

199,991,400 9,225 21,679.28 200.0 9,225 199,999,560 9,110 21,953.85 200.0 9,110 199,780,260 9,408 21,235.15 199.8 9,408 199,709,220 9,225 21,648.70 199.7 9,225 199,999,050 9,064 22,065.21 200.0 9,064 199,999,560 9,110 21,953.85 200.0 9,110 199,111,283 9,110 21,856.34 199.1 9,110

199,588,500 9,026 22,112.62 199.6 9,026 199,996,500 9,110 21,953.51 200.0 9,110 200,000,000 9,026 22,158.21 200.0 9,026 199,995,480 9,110 21,953.40 200.0 9,110

199,999,560 9,345 21,401.77 200.0 9,345 199,999,968 9,110 21,953.89 200.0 9,110 199,905,909 9,110 21,943.57 199.9 9,110 199,984,260 9,064 22,063.58 200.0 9,064

195,800,000 9,338 20,969.21 195.8 9,338 56,202,000 9,387 5,987.22 56.2 9,387 4,998,000 9,282 538.46 5.0 9,282 199,903,680 9,225 21,669.78 199.9 9,225 199,941,879 9,225 21,673.92 199.9 9,225 50,000,000 9,338 5,354.47 50.0 9,338 15,000,000 9,338 1,606.43 15.0 9,338 4,998,700 9,269 539.29 5.0 9,269

36,000,000 9,338 3,855.42 36.0 9,338 30,825,420 9,314 3,309.58 30.8 9,314 199,991,910 9,341 21,410.12 200.0 9,341 16,500,000 9,338 1,767.07 16.5 9,338 230,995,500 9,028 25,586.56 231.0 9,028 220,000,000 9,028 24,368.63 220.0 9,028 134,338,000 8,975 14,968.02 134,338,000 9,338 14,386.93 134.3 8,975 134.3 9,338 242,000,000 9,338 25,917.00 242.0 9,338 136,050,000 8,975 15,158.77 136.1 8,975 137,500,000 9,338 14,725.57 137.5 9,338 G00425 18,235,000 9,030 2,019.38 18,235,000 9,010 2,023.86 18.2 9,030 18.2 9,010

G00425 18,484,500 9,030 2,047.01 18,484,500 9,010 2,051.55 18.5 9,030 18.5 9,010 99,939,000 9,355 10,682.95 99.9 9,355 136,781,500 9,338 14,648.62 136,781,500 9,338 14,648.62 136.8 9,338 136.8 9,338 217,250,000 9,338 23,266.40 217.3 9,338 115,500,000 9,338 12,369.48 115.5 9,338 140,250,000 9,338 15,020.08 140.3 9,338 G00425 42,816,500 9,030 4,741.58 42,816,500 9,010 4,752.11 42.8 9,030 42.8 9,010 115,177,500 8,975 12,833.15 115.2 8,975 G00425 47,871,000 9,030 5,301.33 47,871,000 9,010 5,313.10 47.9 9,030 47.9 9,010 167,750,000 9,338 17,965.19 167.8 9,338 184,250,000 9,338 19,732.26 184.3 9,338 199,990,380 9,298 21,508.97 200.0 9,298 135,718,500 9,338 14,534.00 135.7 9,338 143,000,000 9,338 15,314.59 143.0 9,338 222,750,000 9,338 23,855.42 222.8 9,338 131,037,500 9,356 14,005.72 131.0 9,356 105,032,000 8,975 11,702.73 105,032,000 9,338 11,248.41 105.0 8,975 105.0 9,338 G00425 18,000,000 9,030 1,993.36 18,000,000 9,010 1,997.78 18.0 9,030 18.0 9,010 G00425 13,596,500 9,030 1,505.70 13,596,500 9,010 1,509.05 13.6 9,030 13.6 9,010 78,164,000 9,387 8,326.83 78.2 9,387

101,750,000 8,975 11,337.05 101.8 8,975 G00425 45,160,500 9,030 5,001.16 45,160,500 9,028 5,002.27 45.2 9,030 45.2 9,028 184,250,000 9,338 19,732.26 184.3 9,338 135,858,500 9,338 14,549.77 135.9 9,338 272,250,000 9,338 29,155.07 272.3 9,338 117,907,500 9,356 12,602.34 117.9 9,356 195,797,000 9,338 20,968.89 195.8 9,338 G00425 18,500,000 9,030 2,048.73 18,500,000 9,010 2,053.27 18.5 9,030 18.5 9,010 114,950,000 9,338 12,310.58 115.0 9,338

G00425 13,596,500 9,030 1,505.70 13,596,500 9,010 1,509.05 13.6 9,030 13.6 9,010 82,000,000 9,338 8,781.79 82.0 9,338 131,700,000 9,338 14,104.42 131.7 9,338 G00425 48,050,000 9,030 5,321.15 48,070,000 9,028 5,324.55 48.1 9,030 48.1 9,028 167,750,000 9,338 17,965.19 167.8 9,338 128,623,000 9,091 14,148.39 128,623,000 9,309 13,817.06 128.6 9,091 128.6 9,309

56,202,000 9,387 5,987.22 56.2 9,387 56,202,000 9,387 5,987.22 56.2 9,387 66,361,200 9,281 7,150.22 66.4 9,281 199,991,400 9,357 21,373.45 200.0 9,357 269,000,000 9,225 29,159.89 269.0 9,225 132,932,000 9,091 14,622.37 132,932,000 9,309 14,279.94 132.9 9,091 132.9 9,309 49,980,000 9,389 5,323.25 50.0 9,389

6,428,500 9,338 688.46 6.4 9,338

120,064,000 9,338 12,858.26 120.1 9,338 209,000,000 9,338 22,381.67 209.0 9,338 121,015,500 9,356 12,934.53 121.0 9,356 106,864,000 9,338 11,444.61 106.9 9,338 G00425 17,500,000 9,030 1,937.98 17,500,000 9,010 1,942.29 17.5 9,030 17.5 9,010 108,350,000 9,338 11,603.75 108.4 9,338 G00425 16,506,000 9,030 1,827.91 16,506,000 9,010 1,831.96 16.5 9,030 16.5 9,010 95,671,000 9,387 10,191.86 95.7 9,387 133,363,000 8,975 14,859.39 133.4 8,975 170,500,000 9,338 18,259.71 170.5 9,338 155,092,500 9,408 16,485.17 75,092,500 9,281 8,090.99 155.1 9,408 75.1 9,281 31,445,070 9,314 3,376.11 31.4 9,314

269,000,000 9,225 29,159.89 269.0 9,225

G00425 200,000,000 9,020 22,172.95 200.0 9,020 15,000,000 9,338 1,606.43 15.0 9,338 6,428,500 9,338 688.46 6.4 9,338 14,869,050 9,314 1,596.42 14.9 9,314 112,302,000 9,282 12,098.90 112.3 9,282 34,920,500 9,110 3,833.21 34,920,500 9,314 3,749.25 34.9 9,110 34.9 9,314 80,347,400 9,309 8,631.15 80.3 9,309 93,778,000 9,338 10,043.16 93,778,000 9,038 10,375.97 93.8 9,338 93.8 9,038

200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 4,998,000 9,314 536.61 5.0 9,314 199,991,400 9,341 21,410.06 200.0 9,341 126,971,000 9,091 13,966.67 126,971,000 9,309 13,639.60 127.0 9,091 127.0 9,309

269,000,000 9,225 29,159.89 269.0 9,225 9,996,000 9,314 1,073.22 10.0 9,314 74,930,574 9,225 8,122.56 74.9 9,225 4,998,000 9,309 536.90 5.0 9,309 60,000,000 9,303 6,449.53 60.0 9,303 30,000,000 9,338 3,212.68 30.0 9,338 49,980,000 9,049 5,523.26 50.0 9,049 4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 129,221,500 9,091 14,214.22 129,221,500 9,309 13,881.35 129.2 9,091 129.2 9,309

G00425 20,164,125 9,020 2,235.49 20,164,125 9,028 2,233.51 20.2 9,020 20.2 9,028

199,998,540 9,298 21,509.85 200.0 9,298 49,995,300 9,338 5,353.96 50.0 9,338

49,995,300 9,338 5,353.96 50.0 9,338 50,000,000 9,338 5,354.47 50.0 9,338

4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 60,000,000 9,314 6,441.92 60.0 9,314 60,000,000 9,303 6,449.53 60.0 9,303 60,000,000 9,303 6,449.53 60.0 9,303 60,000,000 9,303 6,449.53 60.0 9,303 60,000,000 9,303 6,449.53 60.0 9,303 60,000,000 9,303 6,449.53 60.0 9,303 G00425 200,000,000 9,020 22,172.95 200.0 9,020

74,970,000 9,049 8,284.89 75.0 9,049

74,970,000 9,049 8,284.89 75.0 9,049 137,371,000 9,028 15,216.11 137,371,000 8,763 15,676.25 137.4 9,028 137.4 8,763 123,165,500 9,091 13,548.07 123,165,500 9,309 13,230.80 123.2 9,091 123.2 9,309

4,998,000 9,282 538.46 5.0 9,282 131,153,000 9,091 14,426.69 131,153,000 9,309 14,088.84 131.2 9,091 131.2 9,309

137,328,500 9,028 15,211.40 137,328,500 8,763 15,671.40 137.3 9,028 137.3 8,763

100

60,000,000 9,338 6,425.70 60.0 9,338 49,980,000 9,389 5,323.25 50.0 9,389 22,891,350 9,110 2,512.77 22,891,350 9,314 2,457.74 22.9 9,110 22.9 9,314

99,070,000 9,338 10,609.91 99,070,000 9,038 10,961.50 99.1 9,338 99.1 9,038 4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 31,833,690 9,314 3,417.83 31.8 9,314

12,000,000 9,338 1,285.14 12.0 9,338 129,978,000 9,091 14,297.44 129,978,000 9,309 13,962.62 130.0 9,091 130.0 9,309

200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 220,000,000 9,028 24,368.63 220.0 9,028 134,435,500 9,408 14,289.49 134,435,500 9,302 14,452.32 134.4 9,408 134.4 9,302 132,787,500 9,091 14,606.48 132,787,500 9,309 14,264.42 132.8 9,091 132.8 9,309

90,021,375 9,328 9,650.66 90,021,375 9,281 9,699.53 90.0 9,328 90.0 9,281 4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 132,800,000 9,091 14,607.85 132,800,000 9,309 14,265.76 132.8 9,091 132.8 9,309

G00425 8,585,850 9,030 950.81 8,585,850 8,980 956.11 8.6 9,030 8.6 8,980 12,857,000 9,338 1,376.92 12.9 9,338 200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028

101

118,427,500 9,091 13,026.89 118,427,500 9,309 12,721.83 118.4 9,091 118.4 9,309

30,000,000 9,338 3,212.85 30.0 9,338 34,157,760 9,314 3,667.36 34.2 9,314 200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 15,000,000 9,338 1,606.43 15.0 9,338

6,428,500 9,338 688.46 6.4 9,338 6,428,500 9,338 688.46 6.4 9,338 4,990,300 9,269 538.39 5.0 9,269 4,998,000 9,282 538.46 5.0 9,282

4,995,900 9,282 538.24 5.0 9,282 220,000,000 9,034 24,352.45 220.0 9,034 220,000,000 9,338 23,560.91 220.0 9,338

18,380,400 9,314 1,973.42 18.4 9,314 91,973,000 9,371 9,814.64 92.0 9,371 68,070,500 9,372 7,263.18 68.1 9,372

G00425 200,000,000 9,064 22,065.31 200.0 9,064 200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 G00425 30,939,150 9,064 3,413.41 30,939,150 9,010 3,433.87 30.9 9,064 30.9 9,010 G00428 200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034 165,166,260 9,338 17,688.49 165.2 9,338 104,432,700 8,980 11,629.48 104.4 8,980 197,951,460 8,975 22,055.87 198.0 8,975 155,762,160 8,975 17,355.12 155.8 8,975 199,818,000 9,026 22,138.05 199.8 9,026

102

199,999,560 9,026 22,158.16 200.0 9,026 199,787,400 9,026 22,134.66 199.8 9,026 200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034 60,000,000 9,387 6,391.82 60.0 9,387 G00425 200,000,000 9,029 22,150.85 200.0 9,029 199,999,560 9,357 21,374.33 200.0 9,357 199,941,420 9,055 22,080.78 199.9 9,055 199,843,500 9,026 22,140.87 199.8 9,026 G00425 199,053,000 9,064 21,960.83 199.1 9,064 G00425 200,000,000 9,029 22,150.85 200.0 9,029 200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 199,955,360 9,021 22,165.54 200.0 9,021 199,999,764 9,064 22,065.29 200.0 9,064 G00428 200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034 188,171,028 8,980 20,954.46 188.2 8,980 G00425 192,982,040 9,064 21,291.05 193.0 9,064 200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 39,988,590 9,225 4,334.81 40.0 9,225

G00425 200,000,000 9,064 22,065.31 200.0 9,064 G00425 199,930,200 9,074 22,033.30 199.9 9,074 G00425 200,000,000 9,050 22,099.45 200.0 9,050 G00425 200,000,000 9,050 22,099.45 200.0 9,050 199,925,100 9,027 22,147.46 199.9 9,027

199,999,152 9,363 21,360.58 200.0 9,363

129,787,095 9,328 13,913.71 129,787,095 9,303 13,951.10 129.8 9,328 129.8 9,303 133,100,000 9,338 14,254.35 133.1 9,338

103

180,762,360 9,408 19,213.69 180.8 9,408 4,996,900 9,269 539.10 5.0 9,269 199,910,514 9,408 21,248.99 199.9 9,408 199,991,400 9,055 22,086.29 200.0 9,055 199,991,400 9,161 21,830.74 200.0 9,161 G00428 200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034

199,986,300 9,421 21,227.71 200.0 9,421

199,995,225 9,408 21,258.00 200.0 9,408

4,999,000 9,282 538.57 5.0 9,282 200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028

G00428 200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034 4,998,000 9,282 538.46 5.0 9,282 4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 122,214,000 9,091 13,443.41 122,214,000 9,309 13,128.59 122.2 9,091 122.2 9,309

74,930,574 9,225 8,122.56 74.9 9,225 4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 117,591,720 9,328 12,606.32 117,591,720 9,281 12,670.16 117.6 9,328 117.6 9,281 133,839,000 9,091 14,722.14 133,839,000 9,309 14,377.38 133.8 9,091 133.8 9,309

104

29,814,600 9,314 3,201.05 29.8 9,314 G00425 200,000,000 9,020 22,172.95 200.0 9,020 122,417,748 9,328 13,123.69 122,417,748 9,281 13,190.15 122.4 9,328 122.4 9,281 59,772,000 9,387 6,367.53 59.8 9,387 24,000,000 9,338 2,570.14 24.0 9,338 101,351,200 9,269 10,934.43 101.4 9,269 69,184,000 9,338 7,409.26 69,184,000 9,038 7,654.79 69.2 9,338 69.2 9,038 113,000,000 9,387 12,037.92 113.0 9,387 30,867,240 9,314 3,314.07 30.9 9,314 34,966,110 9,314 3,754.15 35.0 9,314 199,982,858 9,363 21,358.84 200.0 9,363 112,522,728 9,328 12,062.90 112,522,728 9,281 12,123.99 112.5 9,328 112.5 9,281 56,202,000 9,387 5,987.22 56.2 9,387 G00425 35,476,500 9,030 3,928.74 35,476,500 9,010 3,937.46 35.5 9,030 35.5 9,010 220,000,000 9,028 24,368.63 220.0 9,028 220,000,000 9,028 24,368.63 220.0 9,028 127,859,500 9,091 14,064.40 127,859,500 9,309 13,735.04 127.9 9,091 127.9 9,309

98,157,000 9,408 10,433.35 98,157,000 9,309 10,544.31 98.2 9,408 98.2 9,309 127,278,500 9,091 14,000.49 127,278,500 9,309 13,672.63 127.3 9,091 127.3 9,309

199,925,610 9,341 21,403.02 199.9 9,341 220,000,000 9,028 24,368.63 220.0 9,028 30,000,000 9,338 3,212.85 30.0 9,338 36,000,000 9,338 3,855.42 36.0 9,338 112,594,500 9,408 11,967.95 112,594,500 9,281 12,131.72 112.6 9,408 112.6 9,281 91,678,875 9,351 9,804.18 91,678,875 9,302 9,855.82 91.7 9,351 91.7 9,302

105

124,955,725 9,328 13,395.77 124,955,725 9,281 13,463.61 125.0 9,328 125.0 9,281

15,000,000 9,338 1,606.43 15.0 9,338 15,000,000 9,338 1,606.43 15.0 9,338 199,999,560 9,298 21,509.95 200.0 9,298 91,344,820 9,351 9,768.45 91,344,820 9,302 9,819.91 91.3 9,351 91.3 9,302 62,839,650 9,351 6,720.10 62,839,650 9,303 6,754.77 62.8 9,351 62.8 9,303 134,727,000 9,356 14,400.06 134.7 9,356

50,000,000 9,338 5,354.47 50.0 9,338 131,584,590 9,351 14,071.71 131,584,590 9,303 14,144.32 131.6 9,351 131.6 9,303 4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 131,133,500 9,314 14,079.18 131.1 9,314

4,995,900 9,282 538.24 5.0 9,282 4,996,400 9,269 539.04 5.0 9,269 132,953,500 9,356 14,210.51 133.0 9,356

200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034 129,605,025 9,351 13,860.02 129,605,025 9,303 13,931.53 129.6 9,351 129.6 9,303 132,812,500 9,356 14,195.44 132.8 9,356

25,071,000 9,371 2,675.38 25.1 9,371 134,533,000 9,356 14,379.33 134.5 9,356

131,219,500 9,356 14,025.17 131.2 9,356

127,689,720 9,351 13,655.19 127,689,720 9,302 13,727.13 127.7 9,351 127.7 9,302 130,092,500 9,356 13,904.71 130.1 9,356

106

112,272,675 9,351 12,006.49 112,272,675 9,303 12,068.44 112.3 9,351 112.3 9,303 134,868,500 9,356 14,415.19 134.9 9,356

133,952,500 9,356 14,317.28 134.0 9,356

109,433,250 9,351 11,702.84 109.4 9,351 G00425 200,000,000 9,050 22,099.45 200.0 9,050 G00425 200,000,000 9,050 22,099.45 200.0 9,050 199,992,828 9,110 21,953.11 200.0 9,110 4,998,000 9,314 536.61 5.0 9,314 G00428 200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034 4,999,020 9,314 536.72 5.0 9,314 22,500,000 9,028 2,492.25 22.5 9,028 91,055,500 9,338 9,751.59 91,055,500 9,038 10,074.74 91.1 9,338 91.1 9,038 91,950,000 9,338 9,847.39 91,950,000 9,038 10,173.71 92.0 9,338 92.0 9,038 200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 63,357,450 9,408 6,734.42 63.4 9,408 G00425 200,000,000 9,050 22,099.45 200.0 9,050 200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 110,000,000 9,028 12,184.32 110.0 9,028 G00425 200,000,000 9,050 22,099.45 200.0 9,050 109,176,500 9,408 11,604.64 109,176,500 9,281 11,763.44 109.2 9,408 109.2 9,281

96,894,000 9,408 10,299.11 96,894,000 9,281 10,440.04 96.9 9,408 96.9 9,281 4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 96,640,500 9,356 10,329.25 96.6 9,356

200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 199,998,540 9,341 21,410.83 200.0 9,341 199,999,050 9,408 21,258.40 200.0 9,408

107

4,998,000 9,282 538.46 5.0 9,282 56,000,000 9,387 5,965.70 56.0 9,387 50,000,000 9,338 5,354.47 50.0 9,338

31,651,110 9,314 3,398.23 31.7 9,314 G00425 199,995,500 9,020 22,172.45 200.0 9,020 30,000,000 9,338 3,212.85 30.0 9,338 133,840,500 9,091 14,722.31 133,840,500 9,309 14,377.54 133.8 9,091 133.8 9,309

4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269

84,306,825 9,351 9,015.81 84,306,825 9,303 9,062.33 84.3 9,351 84.3 9,303 129,851,100 9,091 14,283.48 129.9 9,091 49,990,200 9,314 5,367.21 50.0 9,314 119,484,585 9,328 12,809.24 119,484,585 9,281 12,874.11 119.5 9,328 119.5 9,281 199,995,480 9,021 22,169.99 200.0 9,021 4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 199,910,820 9,225 21,670.55 199.9 9,225 4,998,000 9,269 539.22 5.0 9,269 59,772,000 9,387 6,367.53 59.8 9,387 9,996,000 9,356 1,068.41 10.0 9,356

92,381,500 8,980 10,287.47 92,381,500 9,038 10,221.45 92.4 8,980 92.4 9,038

189,200,000 9,338 20,262.38 189.2 9,338 187,000,000 9,028 20,713.34 187.0 9,028 134,722,000 9,356 14,399.53 134.7 9,356

136,238,000 9,338 14,590.41 136.2 9,338 184,250,000 9,338 19,731.21 184.3 9,338

108

126,789,500 9,356 13,551.68 126.8 9,356 G00425 17,250,000 9,030 1,910.30 17,250,000 9,010 1,914.54 17.3 9,030 17.3 9,010 105,600,000 9,338 11,309.24 105.6 9,338 98,299,000 8,975 10,952.53 98.3 8,975 176,000,000 9,338 18,848.73 176.0 9,338 214,500,000 8,975 23,899.72 214.5 8,975 113,564,000 9,338 12,162.14 113.6 9,338 96,675,000 8,975 10,771.59 96.7 8,975 135,272,000 9,338 14,486.96 135.3 9,338 123,595,000 9,338 13,236.41 123.6 9,338 199,972,020 9,225 21,677.18 200.0 9,225 G00425 29,404,560 9,020 3,259.93 29,404,560 9,028 3,257.04 29.4 9,020 29.4 9,028 137,295,500 9,028 15,207.74 137,295,500 8,763 15,667.64 137.3 9,028 137.3 8,763 60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062 60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062

49,999,992 9,338 5,354.46 50.0 9,338

198,863,280 9,298 21,387.75 198.9 9,298 199,974,060 9,298 21,507.21 200.0 9,298 60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062 60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062 60,000,000 8,975 6,685.24 60.0 8,975 60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062 60,000,000 8,975 6,685.24 60.0 8,975 60,000,000 8,975 6,685.24 60.0 8,975 60,000,000 8,975 6,685.24 60.0 8,975 60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062 60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062 60,000,000 8,975 6,685.24 60.0 8,975

109

60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062 60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062 60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062 60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062 60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062 60,000,000 8,975 6,685.24 60.0 8,975 199,981,200 9,311 21,477.95 200.0 9,311 50,000,000 9,338 5,354.47 50.0 9,338 200,000,000 9,034 22,138.59 200.0 9,034 199,999,968 9,298 21,510.00 200.0 9,298 199,999,560 9,371 21,342.39 200.0 9,371 199,980,100 9,371 21,340.32 200.0 9,371 199,805,760 9,039 22,104.85 199.8 9,039 199,997,265 9,298 21,509.71 200.0 9,298 199,999,560 9,039 22,126.29 200.0 9,039 199,999,050 9,039 22,126.24 200.0 9,039 199,999,560 9,225 21,680.17 200.0 9,225 199,995,480 9,371 21,341.96 200.0 9,371 200,000,000 9,028 22,153.30 200.0 9,028 199,999,560 9,039 22,126.29 200.0 9,039 199,981,200 9,311 21,477.95 200.0 9,311 199,999,560 9,371 21,342.39 200.0 9,371 199,999,050 9,371 21,342.34 200.0 9,371 199,916,940 9,039 22,117.15 199.9 9,039 199,998,540 9,298 21,509.85 200.0 9,298 199,995,990 9,039 22,125.90 200.0 9,039 60,000,000 9,062 6,621.05 60.0 9,062 199,999,560 9,039 22,126.29 200.0 9,039 50,000,000 9,338 5,354.47 50.0 9,338 199,999,560 9,225 21,680.17 200.0 9,225

110

199,999,560 9,039 22,126.29 200.0 9,039 199,990,380 9,298 21,508.97 200.0 9,298 60,000,000 8,975 6,685.24 60.0 8,975 99,809,500 9,408 10,609.00 99,809,500 9,309 10,721.83 99.8 9,408 99.8 9,309 106,712,000 9,408 11,342.69 106,712,000 9,309 11,463.32 106.7 9,408 106.7 9,309 110,706,000 9,408 11,767.22 110,706,000 9,309 11,892.36 110.7 9,408 110.7 9,309 74,999,325 9,154 8,193.07 75.0 9,154 G00425 219,254,000 9,064 24,189.54 219.3 9,064 G00425 96,755,000 9,064 10,674.65 96.8 9,064 151,519,000 9,066 16,712.88 151.5 9,066 66,655,000 8,980 7,422.61 66.7 8,980 127,815,000 8,980 14,233.30 127.8 8,980 127,815,000 8,980 14,233.30 127.8 8,980 4,998,000 9,282 538.46 5.0 9,282 74,978,500 9,309 8,054.41 75.0 9,309 74,980,000 9,345 8,023.54 75.0 9,345 74,999,580 9,372 8,002.52 74,999,580 9,281 8,080.98 75.0 9,372 75.0 9,281 74,984,280 9,217 8,135.43 74,984,280 9,281 8,079.33 75.0 9,217 75.0 9,281 74,995,500 9,225 8,129.59 74,995,500 9,309 8,056.24 75.0 9,225 75.0 9,309 74,972,000 9,345 8,022.69 75.0 9,345 29,995,000 9,217 3,254.31 29,995,000 9,309 3,222.15 30.0 9,217 30.0 9,309 74,978,500 9,309 8,054.41 75.0 9,309

74,973,125 8,975 8,353.55 75.0 8,975 74,942,460 9,356 8,010.10 74.9 9,356 29,995,000 9,217 3,254.31 29,995,000 9,309 3,222.15 30.0 9,217 30.0 9,309 74,932,700 9,225 8,122.79 74,995,500 9,309 8,056.24 74.9 9,225 75.0 9,309 37,499,790 9,154 4,096.55 37,499,790 9,309 4,028.34 37.5 9,154 37.5 9,309 199,991,400 9,357 21,373.45 200.0 9,357 29,982,500 9,217 3,252.96 29,982,500 9,309 3,220.81 30.0 9,217 30.0 9,309

111

74,995,245 9,217 8,136.62 74,995,245 9,302 8,062.27 75.0 9,217 75.0 9,302

74,999,580 9,372 8,002.52 74,999,580 9,303 8,061.87 75.0 9,372 75.0 9,303 74,998,500 9,345 8,025.52 75.0 9,345 74,971,250 8,975 8,353.34 74,971,250 8,974 8,354.27 75.0 8,975 75.0 8,974 74,998,560 9,225 8,129.93 74,998,560 9,282 8,080.00 75.0 9,225 75.0 9,282

50,000,000 9,387 5,326.52 50.0 9,387 74,997,500 9,345 8,025.41 75.0 9,345 200,000,000 8,980 22,271.71 200.0 8,980 199,104,000 8,980 22,171.94 199.1 8,980 200,000,000 8,980 22,271.71 200.0 8,980 200,000,000 8,980 22,271.71 200.0 8,980 17,025,903 9,034 1,884.65 17,025,903 9,107 1,869.54 17.0 9,034 17.0 9,107 410,692,000 9,066 45,300.24 410.7 9,066 G00425 99,806,000 9,064 11,011.25 99.8 9,064

49,784,500 9,387 5,303.56 49.8 9,387

112

113