arXiv:1810.00701v1 [physics.bio-ph] 1 Oct 2018 ∗ lsn h oewe eurd3.Teincanl are channels ion The by required[3]. permeability mem- when ion pore the the the across restrict closing or ions pores which transport creating in either brane states can inactive and they open states closed, conformational as several such adopt states can where structures mechanism protein the gating dependent distinct potential very have struc- electrical They both diversity[2]. of functional degree and tural high a exhibiting proteins[1] brane lcrncades [email protected],*[email protected] address: Electronic o hnesaetpclyvr ope transmem- complex very typically are channels Ion 2 oeNtoa etefrBscSine,BokJ,Secto Block-JD, Sciences, Basic for Centre National Bose N S lcig nciesaebokn t a lob xlrdu explored be blocki also details. of can functional types and etc structural other blocking Many state inactive scheme. divers blocking, binding in selected blocking channel site ion our of results regard experimental informations fundamental Some modulate finding itself of gating possibility altered the such sho and also dynamics have gating We bl the importance. channel pharmacological potassium so and the that while iological found potential have action We of conductances. duration cha potassium between and affi competition the sodium binding to affin all channel due drug minima potassium the and and maxima as through sodium frequency spiking equal the with activi of blockers spiking decrease gradual enhanced a an by blocke initially affin channel blockers drug sodium increasing channel with only sium exponentially of off presence chan falls potassium In generation and sodium currents. but ionic potential on action currents an ionic of potassium course and a sodium the although physiological that and channe termina found distinct potential ion are action of blockers of channel presence nature potassium the the that in to show change due results Our trends, etc dynamics frequency gating spiking experi altered currents, major the ionic that showed as and such blocking blocking type channel dual sodium mainly (iii) only have and (i) Ho we as of model such mechanism Markov neuron blocking Hodgkin-Huxley basic the very of a io extension on of presence technique in simulation affected stochastic are properties intrinsic sociated eta,LclAeteis ilsi simulation. Gillespie Anesthetics, Local tential, ffc fSt eetv o hne lcigo cinPoten Action on Blocking Channel Ion Selective Site Of Effect nti okw aetertclyivsiae o h acti the how investigated theoretically have we work this In Keywords: .INTRODUCTION I. 1 ninAscainfrteCliaino cec,Jadavpu Science, of Cultivation the for Association Indian o hnes oimCanlBokr;PtsimCanlB Channel Potassium Blockers; Channel Sodium Channels; Ion rsnnuPal Krishnendu Dtd coe ,2018) 2, October (Dated: 1 s.in , 2 , + n atmGangopadhyay Gautam and eettpssc sctoi lces noi blockers, anionic blockers, cationic as such treat dif- types to of blockers ferent tool Channel valuable disorders[4–6]. a blockers neural them channel numerous make membrane. these channels of the certain specificity across on of ions degree of high passage The mechanism gating the their blocking regulate by and blockers conformations channels ion channel protein the specific ion of to compounds as bind certain selectively called exists which typically in There molecules, termination neurons. or its the and of generation most responsible general potential mainly in action are channels for channels ion potassium var- neutral and the and sodium Among anion cation, system[2]. sig- ious nervous and in communication propagation cell to nal cell of the requirement are basic which potentials action generating for responsible yvr ieetfo ahohr ehave We other. each from different very ly hne lcesb dpigGillepie’s adapting by blockers channel n n rbblsi n yaia features. dynamical and probabilistic ing yo cinptnili on followed found is potential action of ty t,weesi otat o nypotas- only for contrast, in whereas ity, cesdlyi hc r fgetphys- great of are which it delay ockers ytm aebe aiae through validated been have systems e h o hne lcigwihopens which blocking channel ion the s inpoesi rsneo oimand sodium of presence in process tion igormto ihdsrdlvlof level desired with method our sing alter blockers channel ion the how wn i)ol oasu hne blocking channel potassium only (ii) , cinptnilsaeadduration, and shape potential action etladpyilgclobservations physiological and mental aeitreedn eainhpover relationship interdependent have -I,Sl ae okt-016 India. Kolkata-700106, Lake, Salt r-III, gmcaim uha lsdstate closed as such mechanisms ng stefeunyo cinpotential action of frequency the rs e lceshv itntsignatures distinct have blockers nel gi-ulytp.Wt simple a With type. dgkin-Huxley nptnilgnrto n t as- its and generation potential on lcescnb elreproduced. well be can blockers l imcanlbokr hre the shorten blockers channel dium t nrae.I aeo ultype dual of case In increases. ity iy h pkn rqec passes frequency spiking the nity, nlnme utainadover- and fluctuation number nnel netgtdtretpso drug of types three investigated ,Klaa703,India. Kolkata-700032, r, 2 , ∗ okr;Ato po- Action lockers; tial 2 amino acids, and other chemicals regulate the functional small, the effect of internal noise become more and more properties of the channel or prevent them to respond nor- important[18, 21–23]. Channel number fluctuations can mally. The naturally occurring sodium channel selective itself cause spontaneous spiking activity[23] without any blocker TTX[7] was known since 1964, followed by Sax- stimulus and thereby the stochastic version of Hodgkin- itoxin (STX), Neosaxitoxin (NSTX). Local anesthetics Huxley model is proposed[18, 20, 23]. Therefore, the ef- such as Lidocain, Phenytoin, Amiloride, Bupivacaine and fect of channel noise can not be ignored also in the study Tetracaine etc are clinically used[8, 9] for sodium channel of drug binding. Although innumerable number of exper- blocking. On the other hand potassium channel blockers, iments have been performed to study the channel block- such as 4-aminopyridine and 3, 4-diaminopyridine etc are ing phenomena, the theoretical investigation and com- used as local anaesthetics[10] and Tetraethylammonium prehensive understanding of the state specific blocking (TEA) is used only for experimental purpose[6, 11]. A still requires detailed investigation from which the corre- sodium blocker that blocks the open pore of the channel sponding physiological consequences of drug blocking can are called open state blocker[8, 12, 13]. Also there exists be deduced that too from the level of action potential de- closed state blocker, inactive state stabilizing blockers scription itself. From the vast number of studies already etc[8, 12, 13]. Potassium channel blockers either bind made it is very difficult to comprehend the mechanistic with the selectivity filter or at the central cavity(open link between the site specific blocking and the biophysical state) of the channel[14]. From the discovery of TTX consequences of that. So a microscopic reverse analysis toxicity[7] the present knowledge of ion channel block- is necessary from theoretical perspective to validate the ers have been a very vast, complicated and rigorous known observations. journey which was mostly developed for pharmacologi- Inspired by the work done by Schmid, Goychuk and cal interests[4–6, 9, 11]. H¨anggi[24] on the effect of ion channel blockers using Langevin type of stochastic description, we present here Recently Markov modelling and computer simula- a simple yet detailed and realistic approach for chan- tions prove to be promising techniques which provide nel blocking kinetics using the standard Markovian squid new insights into the fundamental principle and mech- axon model of Hodgkin-Huxley[17] which represents a anism about how these drugs alter the normal biologi- basic neuron cell type. We have incorporated new drug cal process[5, 15]. Single channel Markov models with blocked states in the original Hodgkin-Huxley model to discrete protein conformational states can simulate state theoretically extend it to a drug binding model. We then specific channel properties and their alterations by mu- have suitably adapted Gillespie[25] stochastic simulation tations, disease or drug binding[15]. As Markov mod- algorithm to study the effect of ion channel blockers on els can be developed both at the level of single chan- action potential, ionic current, spiking frequency, action nel activity and at the macroscopic state, they pro- potential duration and gating dynamics in moderately vide an implicit relationship between the single channel stochastic limit of channel noise. We have proposed recording and the macroscopic current[16]. Now the fa- three types of drug blocking mechanisms, e.g, sodium mous neuronal action potential model of Hodgkin and channel only blocking, potassium channel only blocking Huxley[17] is based on an assumption that the ion per- and a dual type blocking scheme with comparative bind- meation process can be approximated as both continu- ing affinity to these two channels. We have shown here ous and deterministic[17] as it considers infinite number through a few experimental evidences[26–38] that our ap- of ion channels inside a neuron. However, the perme- proach successfully correlates to the known physiological ation process existing within active membrane is now effects of ion channel blocking. known to be neither continuous nor deterministic. Ac- tive membrane consists of finite number of ion channels The Layout of the paper is as follows. In Section (II) which undergo random fluctuations between open and we have discussed the kinetic scheme of drug blocking and closed states[2] which scale inversely proportional to the the suitable modification of the simulation algorithm for number of channels present in a particular patch of a the present purpose. Effect of channel noise on the action neuron. Recent works also reveal that fluctuation in the potential has been discussed also under this section. In states of these channels are physiologically important in Section (III) the sodium and potassium channel blocking small neuronal structures[18–21]. When the number of effects on the trains of action potential have been dis- ion channels inside a neuron cell membrane is finite or cussed with fundamental biophysical details. In Section 3

(IV) comparative study on the effect of different types of four distinct states and one inactivating h gate with blockers on ionic current, spiking frequency, action po- two distinct states. Thus the kinetic scheme based on tential duration and gating dynamics has been discussed Markov process has 8 states, such as, m0h0(resting state), under various subsections. In Section (V) we have dis- m1h0,m2h0,m3h0,m0h1,m1h1,m2h1,m3h1(open state cussed how our results are in good agreement with the or ion conducting state), with a total of 20 transition experimental and theoretical works done earlier. Finally rates designated by αm,hs and βm,hs. Thus as a whole the paper is concluded in Section (VI). there are 28 transitions between 13 states to be consid- ered for simulating action potential[43]. Each ion channel randomly fluctuates between these discrete states. II. PROPOSED KINETIC SCHEME AND 1 2 3 4 5




4α3 α2 α α kp n n n n on




D STOCHASTIC SIMULATION OF ACTION n0 n1 n2 n3 n4




P β2 β3 β4 β FP




POTENTIAL IN PRESENCE OF CHANNEL n n n n B




BLOCKERS

(a) Markov Kinetic Scheme of Potassium Ion Channel The stochasticity in the Hodgkin-Huxley model is implemented in two ways such as theoretical




approximation[39] method where it approximates the dy- 5 α6 α 7 α 8 ks




3m 2 m m on




m h m 1 h 1 m h1 m h 1




DS namics of the internal gating variables are governed by 0 1 2 3




β 2 β 3β FSB Langevin[39] type of description of stochasticity, where m m m




αβ αβ α β α β the Gaussian white noise terms are added to the internal h h hh h h h h 1 α 2α 4 gating dynamical variables, described in the later part of 3m 2 m 3 αm m h m h m h m h this paper. The other one is the computational stochas- 0 0 1 0 20 3 0 βm2 β m3 β m tic simulation based on kinetic Monte-Carlo simulation (b) Markov Kinetic Scheme of Sodium Ion Channel of Hodgkin-Huxley Markov model[18–20, 25, 40–44]. In this paper we have used the second one. FIG. 1: Markov model of Potassium and Sodium ion channel: The potassium channel in figure (a) is a five state model where we have added an extra A. Markov Model of Hodgkin-Huxley Action ‘drug-bound’ state, DP . Similarly in figure (b) sodium Potential Simulation channel is an eight state model where we have added a

‘drug-bound’ state, DS. Here we briefly describe the Hodgkin-Huxley Markov model and its kinetic scheme. The Hodgkin and Huxley(1952)[17] gating mechanism consists of four ac- tivating n gates for potassium channel and its Markov The expressions of the voltage dependent rates[23] model consists of five states, such as, n0(resting state, are given as follows αm(V ) = (0.1(V + 40))(1 − −1 when all four gates are closed), n1(only one gate is open), exp[−(V + 40)/10]) , βm(V ) = 4 exp[−(V + n2, n3 and n4(open state or the single ion conducting 65)/18], αh(V ) = 0.07 exp[−V + 65)/20], βh(V ) = −1 state, when all four gates are open). The model of potas- 1 + exp[−(V = 35)/10] , αn(V ) = (0.01(V + 55))(1 − −1 sium channel thus have 8 transition rates designated by exp[−(V +55)/10]) , βn(V )=0.125 exp[−(V +65)/80]. αns and βns between these 5 states. On the other hand, The Hodgkin-Huxley[17] action potential or transmem- the sodium channel has three activating m gates with brane voltage, V is given by the equation,

d C V (t)+ G (t)(V (t) − E )+ G (t)(V (t) − E )+ G (V (t) − E )= I (t). (1) m dt K K Na Na L L ext

Here V is in mV unit and the rates are in ms−1. Param- eters and their descriptions are given in TABLE I [23]. 4

2 Cm Membrane capacitance 1 µF/cm + EK K reversal potential -77.0 mV + 2 ρK K channel density 18 channels/ µm max + + 2 gK Maximal K channel conductance(all K channels are open) 36.0 mS/cm + γK Single K channel conductance 20 pS + ENa Na reversal potential 50.0 mV + 2 ρNa Na channle density 60 channels/µm max + + 2 gNa Maximal Na channel conductance(all Na channels are open) 120.0 mS/cm + γNa Single Na channel conductance 20 pS EL Leak reversal potential -54.4 mV 2 gL Leak conductance 0.3 mS/cm

TABLE I: Parameters of Hodgkin-Huxley equation[23].

For a discrete stochastic channel populations the potas- forward transition rate for sodium or potassium blocking sium and sodium membrane conductances across are ex- are given by ‘kxon’, where x=s for sodium blockers and pressed by the following equations (2), x=p for potassium blockers. The affinity of drug bind-

ing is usually defined as kxon= kxb*[D], where kxb is the max GK (V,t) = gK [Nn4 /NK ] , (2a) binding constant of the drug and [D] is the concentra- max GNa(V,t) = gNa [Nm3h1 /NNa] , (2b) tion of the drug[12]. Thus any change of the value of ‘kxon’ means the change of concentration of the block- where Nn4 and Nm3h1 are the number of potassium and ers or drugs of a particular type having specific binding sodium channels in open state, respectively and NK and constant. NNa are the total number of potassium and sodium chan- nels present in the membrane patch considered, respec- Now the backward transition for reopening is a very tively. Solving the stochastic simulation one obtains the slow process compared to the forward. Channel block- population of individual states from which the open state ers or local anesthetics take around 1-4 hours(duration 1 populations for sodium and potassium channel are put of action) before they are completely removed from the into conductance equation (2) and then solving equation channel proteins[45]. In general, clinically used channel (1) one obtains the action potential. blockers or local anesthetics can be divided into three categories: short acting (e.g., 2-chloroprocaine, 45-90 minutes), intermediate duration (e.g., lidocaine, mepi- B. Proposed Scheme of Channel Blocking vacaine, 90-180 minutes), and long acting (e.g., bupi- vacaine, levobupivacaine, ropivacaine, 4-18 hours)[45]. Now, in this work we have studied the effect of ion Thus it is seen that elimination of the drug from the channel blockers on action potential. Ion channel block- site or the recovery of the channel is a very slow pro- ers can bind to several conformational states of ion chan- cess compared to that of drug binding where the onset nels such as closed state, inactivated state and open-state of local anaesthetic actions take place within few min- of ion channels[2]. However, here we have only considered utes(as we shall also see that the simulation runs with the case of those blockers which preferentially bind to the the transition rates mentioned earlier take few seconds open states of the channels. As these blockers block the only to completely terminate the action potential gen- open-pore of the channel and hinder ion permeation, we eration for a patch area we have considered in this pa- can think of a state, say,“drug bound” state which is ac- per). Thus the backward flux can therefore reasonably cessible only if the channels enter the open state. Thus be considered as a very small valued constant during the the drug bound state is coupled to the open state of the sodium or potassium channel. The drug bound state ba- sically represents the state of channels which are blocked 1 Amide blockers(lidocaine, bupivacaine, mepivacaine etc) are bio- by the blockers. To implement this on potassium chan- transformed in the liver, ester blockers(cocaine, benzocaine, pro- caine etc ) are hydrolyzed in the bloodstream by plasma esterases nel we designate this drug bound state as DP and for or the hydrolysis of the side chains of the blockers make them sodium channel it is DS as seen from figure (1). The inactive and then they are eliminated via blood circulation[45]. 5 course of drug binding action. We designate the back- algorithm for the site selective binding of sodium and 2 ward flux as FxB=0.001, a constant throughout . Now, potassium blockers for a particular patch size of a neu- we have gradually increased the drug binding affinity, ron have been elaborately discussed in Appendix (A1). kxon from 0.0001 to 1.0 or more, keeping FxB =0.001, constant. When we consider only sodium blockers we D. Effect of Channel Number Fluctuation do not consider the potassium blocking state, DP and vice verse except for dual type of blocking as we shall discuss later. Thus with the attached single drug-bound Next we have studied the action potential and con- state Hodgkin-Huxley model now have 14 states and 30 ductance of sodium and potassium channels without the transition rates. presence of external stimulus or external current, Iext = 0.0µA/cm2. We start from very high stochastic limit of channel noise with patch size as low as A = 1.0 µm2 C. Stochastic Ion Channel Simulation Using and extend it to the deterministic limit such as A = 200 Gillespie Algorithm µm2. Here we do not consider the presence of any drug,

hence kxon = FxB =0.0. Thus here we consider 13 states The computer based stochastic simulation algorithm and 28 reactions: the original Hodgkin-Huxley model. In using Markovian model can be classified into two al- Iext=0.0 90 gorithms, such as, i) Channel-State-Tracking(CST) al- 60 A=1.0 a 30 gorithm and ii) Channel-Number-Tracking(CNT) algo- 0 -30 rithm. The CST algorithm tracks the specific states of V (mV) -60 each channel and superimposes individual channel cur- 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 60 A=10.0 b rents corresponding to the states. This algorithm al- 30 0 though simple but it is computationally very costly and -30 V (mV) -60 intensive[19–21]. However an easy alternate is CST algo- 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 rithm using Gillespie method[25, 40, 42, 43] which keeps 60 A=100.0 c 30 track of the number of channels in each state with the 0 -30 assumption that multi-channel systems are independent V (mV) -60 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 and memoryless. This Channel Number Tracking(CNT) 60 A=200.0 d algorithm provides much greater efficiency in cases where 30 0 -30

many channels are simulated as the algorithm calculates V (mV) -60 an effective transition rate associated with the multi- 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Time (mS) channel system by allowing only one transition among all states in a random time interval. Thus in this paper FIG. 2: Effect of channel number fluctuation on we have utilized Gillespie’s CST simulation algorithm to action potential: Action potentials of various patch study the effect of ion channel blockers. The simulation size are plotted here. From (a) to (d) the action method is very well known in the literature[25, 40, 42, 43]. potentials are shown for A= 1.0, 10.0, 100.0, 200.0 µm2 2 The steps that we considered to develop the stochastic at Iext =0.0 µA/cm . It shows how the effect of channel noise and consequent spontaneous action potential generation falls off as the deterministic limit is 2 There is roughly 18,000 channels in total are present in 200 µm2 approached. patch area(area that we have chosen in this work). If we even consider the blocking action prolongs for 1 hour, then the approx- ≈ 1 × ≈ imate flux becomes FxB 1×3600×103 18000 0.005. Now figure (2) we have shown how the action potential vary in fact not exactly 18000 blocked channels will be there. Blood from patch size, A=1.0 to 200 µm2. As seen from figure circulation hinders the channel blockers to penetrate the lipid bi- layers by washing them out and a certain fraction of the blockers 2(a) that at very low patch size channel noise plays very can enter to block channels, thus have lesser chance to block all important role. These channel number fluctuations can the channels, also density of the patch is not homogeneous ev- erywhere that some patches can have lesser number of channels. alone originate spontaneous spiking activity[23] without Besides some drug actions last more than 4 hours. Consider- even the presence of external current. As soon as the ing these facts together we have taken a lower value which is 0.001(easy to compare), which hardly impacts the nature of the patch size is increased the spontaneous spiking rate de- results as we have verified. creases. As we can see at moderately high patch size, 6 for example, A = 200µm2, the spiking phenomenon van- A. Only Sodium Channels Are Blocked ishes away and system behaves similarly as it does in 2 deterministic limit at Iext =0.0µA/cm . As mentioned earlier, here we have considered only the As a side note we would like to mention here that the open state sodium channel blockers in this study. Here we Gillespie method that we have used to simulate action do not add any potassium blockers together. Thus here potential, although is a very popular method and often only DS state is present not DP . In figure (3) we have claimed to be an exact simulation technique in litera- Effect of Sodium Channel Only Blockers µ 2 µ 2 -1 ( Iext = 6.9 A/cm , A = 200 m, Fs B = 0.001 ms ) ture, however, contrary to that popular belief it can not 60 a No Drugs 30 0 be claimed as an exact method especially while consider- -30 -60 ing very low patch sizes. It is basically an approximate 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 60 b 30 ks on = 0.001 0 method which works fine for higher patch sizes. A brief -30 -60 discussion about its applicability has been discussed in 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 60 c 30 ks on = 0.01 0 Appendix (A2). Exact simulation for figure 2 (a) and -30 -60 (b) is beyond the scope here. These two plots are not ex- 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 60 30 d ks on = 0.05 act but here their sole purpose is to convey the message 0 -30 -60 that at low patch sizes the channel fluctuations do play 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 60 e 30 ks on = 0.1 very important role. Action Potential (mV) 0 -30 -60 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 60 30 f ks on = 0.5 0 -30 -60 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Time (ms) III. SODIUM AND POTASSIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS FIG. 3: Effect of sodium channel only blockers: Action potentials in presence of sodium channel only Now we come to the main focus of this work, i.e. study- blockers with increasing affinities are plotted here. In ing stochastic drug binding kinetics in ion channels. To figure (a) the action potentials are plotted without the see the effect on action potentials we have gradually in- presence of any drug. From figure (b) to (f) the action creased the external stimulus from zero to higher values potentials are plotted for kson=0.001, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1 2 2 2 and seen that at Iext = 6.9 µA/cm they show consid- and 0.5 with A= 200 µm , Iext =6.9 µA/cm and −1 erable amount of spiking activity. The values of ionic reopening flux, FSB= 0.001 ms . In all the cases current lesser than 6.9 µA/cm2 show very irregular spik- where Na-blocker is present the action potential train ing pattern with higher intervals which requires very long ultimately dies off, sooner for higher affinity(not shown time simulations and become very clumsy to be presented for (b) and (c) as they require more than 20,000 ms, in plots. At this selected value of ionic current they show plotting them makes the plots compact and clumsy, the considerable amount of spiking activity with lesser in- train dies off similarly as shown in (d)-(f)). tervals which can be plotted very nicely and helps us to interpret the effect of drugs on action potential spik- shown the effect of sodium channel blockers on action po- ing trend. However the results in general discussed here tentials train with time with increasing drug affinity or show exactly similar behavior for all other choices of Iext concentration. It is seen that in presence of drug the spik- other than zero. We have kept the patch size, A=200 ing activity gradually dies off temporally. With increas- µm2 for which the effect of channel number fluctuation ing affinity the spiking activity dies off in a faster rate. is moderately close to the deterministic limit but not ex- As seen from figure 3(f) at very high value of kson =0.5 actly the deterministic limit, because with the value of the system almost fails to regenerate action potentials. 2 Iext =6.9 µA/cm , a considerably higher patch size is re- As the affinity increases more channels quickly go to the quired to match deterministic result. On the other hand drug-bound state and gets trapped in the drug bound at very low patch size the channel noise makes it almost state. Thus the available open sodium channels gradu- impossible to study the binding effects. At this value ally decreases which makes it difficult for that particular 2 of patch size, A=200 µm , we are dealing with almost patch to generate action potential. Beyond kson = 1.0 12000 sodium channels and 3600 potassium channels. we have seen that the patch totally fails to generate even 7 a single spike after the first spike. larize > hyperpolarize > again comes back to resting po- tential). But for potassium blocking case we see that after a few millisecond the spiking activity entirely falls B. Only Potassium Channels Are Blocked off with the last spike having incomplete shape. This happens due to lack of available open potassium chan- Next we have studied the effect of open state potassium nels. Due to the lack of available open potassium chan- channel blockers on the action potential generation. Here nels the repolarization process gets hampered, leading to the DP state is only considered, not DS state. In fig- the incomplete generation of action potential. Once it is not complete further generation of action potential is not Effect of Potassium Channel Only Blocker µ 2 µ 2 -1 (I ext = 6.9 A/cm , A = 200 m , Fp B = 0.001 ms ) possible as the refactorization process which was neces- 60 a No Drugs 30 0 -30 sary for further generation of action potential could not -60 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000 15000 complete. Thus no action potential generation can take 60 b kp = 0.0001 30 on 0 place further as seen from figures 4(d-f). But in case of -30 -60 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000 15000 sodium channels there remains plenty of available potas- 60 c kp = 0.001 30 on 0 sium channels which can restore the depolarized potential -30 -60 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000 15000 back to the resting one. Thus in sodium blocking case the 60 30 d kpon = 0.005 0 spikes generate with complete shape even if there number -30 -60 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 2400 2800 3200 3600 4000 decreases with increasing affinity. 60 e 30 kpon = 0.01 0 -30 Action Potential (mV) -60 0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500 60 30 f kp on = 0.1 IV. EFFECT OF THE CHANNEL BLOCKERS 0 -30 -60 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Time (ms) In this section we have shown how the sodium and potassium channel blockers and local anesthetics(dual FIG. 4: Effect of potassium channel only type blockers) affect the ionic current, spiking frequency, blockers: Action potentials in various blocking duration of the action potential and gating dynamics, all affinities of potassium only blockers are plotted here. In of which plays physiologically very significant roles. figure (a) the action potentials are plotted without the presence of any drug. From figure (b) to (f) the action potentials are plotted for kpon = 0.0001, 0.001, 0.005, A. Ionic Current 2 2 0.01 and 0.1 for A = 200 µm , Iext =6.9 µA/cm and −1 reopening flux, F PB = 0.001 ms . Although here also The sodium and potassium ionic currents across the action potential dies off temporally but the nature of membrane are given by the eqution (8). Now here we termination is quite different from that of the sodium would like to point out that although sodium and potas- channel only blocker. sium channels are two different proteins, during an action potential, they work together and thus sodium and potas- ure (4) the action potentials for various kpon are plotted. sium currents have interdeppendent relationship. The Here also for all the cases where drug is present ultimately number of spikes of sodium ionic current is equal to the the spiking activity of the action potential dies off tem- number of spikes of potassium ionic current. Hampering porally. As usual with increasing affinity the blocking of sodium channel conductance with sodium channel block- action potential occurs in a faster rate. But, surprisingly ers may not directly affect the gating mechanism inside here we have observed an interesting trend of action po- the potassium channel proteins, but the decreased effi- tential termination which is quite different from sodium ciency of conductance leads to decrease in the number blocking case. of sodium ions coming inside and thus less number of If we carefully notice the spikes in figures (3) and (4) potassium ions are required go out side to balance that at high affinity regions, we can see that in presence of depolarization, leading to a decrease in the magnitude of sodium channel blockers the number of generated action potassium current too. On the other hand if we keep on potentials although decreases down significantly, but ev- decreasing the ionic conductance of potassium channels ery spike has a complete shape(they depolarize > repo- by applying potassium blockers, the repolarization pro- 8 cess or refactorization process would gradually get ham- ally shrinks over time. If we plot in a 3D diagram with pered which in turn will also affect the membrane po- membrane depolarization in x axis, currents in y axis and tential which eventually becomes unsuitable for sodium time in z axis we see that with increasing time the area channels to open as we have seen from figure (4). Thus of the ionic currents shrink gradually with corresponding both of the currents are affected if anyone of them is decrease in the peak height of the action potentials. This disturbed. shows the gradual decrease of sodium ion influx inside the Now in figure (5) we have shown the interdependent cell membrane. nature of sodium and potassium currents and how the Next we have observed an interesting feature of potas- currents are being affected in presence of ion channel sium channel blocking on both the ionic currents. Un- blockers with increasing drug binding affinity. The cur- like the case of sodium blockers in 5(a), here we see rents are generated in response to a change in the respec- that the loop area of both the ionic currents falls down tive ion channel conductances. The total number of Na+ very rapidly covering the entire space which indicates or K+ ions that permeate inside or outside the membrane the decrease in the potassium channel conductance over during the action potential is proportional to the areas time. Unlike the sodium only blockers, the correspond- under the individual current curves in the figures. ing action potential magnitude is much higher here when the currents fall down to zero. This once again clearly Sodium Only Blocker Potassium Only Blocker 1000 1000 says that the membrane repolarization process is dras- No Drugs a No Drugs b kp = 0.05 tically hampered. As the loop areas are proportional 800 kson = 0.05 800 on kson = 0.5 kpon = 0.5 600 600 to the number of ions being permitted across the mem- I K 400 400 brane, the potassium only blockers show this amount is 200 200 hampered more rapidly than sodium blockers of equal 0 0 affinity. The effect of blockers on effective ionic current, -200 -200 I Iint = INa + IK + IL over the corresponding action po- Na -400 -400 -600 -600 tentials can also be found in the supplemental materiel

-800 -800 figure (S1).

-1000 -1000 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 Action Potential (mV) Action Potential (mV) B. Spiking Frequency FIG. 5: Ionic current: In this figure we have plotted the sodium and potassium channel ionic currents Next we have studied the effect of the two types of together with their corresponding action potentials. In blockers on the spiking frequency of the action potentials the left panel, figure (a), the effect of sodium channel with increasing kxon in figure 6(a). Here we have found only blockers with affinity, ks = 0.05, 0.5 are on an interesting difference of spiking frequency trends be- compared with the case where no drug is present. The tween sodium and potassium blockers. It is seen that in top trace represents the potassium ionic current and the presence of sodium channel blockers the spiking rate falls bottom trace represents the corresponding sodium ionic off exponentially with increasing affinity. But in presence current. In the right panel similar plot has been shown of potassium channel blockers the spiking frequency ini- with potassium only blockers. A= 200 µm2 and tially with increasing kpon increases unlike sodium chan- I =6.9 µA/cm2. Both the blockers have different ext nel and then it decreases. This initial increase in spiking signatures of blocking. activity in presence of potassium blockers is consistent with the earlier works done in literature [24, 46]. This The red dotted curves in each traces of figure 5(a) rep- happens because with the increase in affinity number of resents the case of drug free situation. After the first potassium channels decrease which causes an increase in spike the loop area shrinks. Afterwards the area of ionic the internal noise and therefore channel number fluctua- currents slightly change due to the presence of the fluc- tion starts playing significant role by spontaneously gen- tuation in the number of available open channels which erating action potentials, as we have already seen from creates the broadening of the band. The blue dot-dashed the figure(2). Actually in presence of potassium blockers curve for affinity kson=0.05 and and black-solid line for there exists a competition between the overall conduc- kson= 0.5 shows that both of the ionic currents gradu- tance of the ions and the channel noise. In the low affin- 9

Sodium / Potassium Only Blockers Dual Type Blockers 80 80 ters with time. First we have chosen three drug affinity a Sodium only Blocker b kson > kp on : 10 times 75 75 kp > ks : 10 times Potassium only Blocker on on regions such as low, medium and high, corresponding to 70 70 ks on = kp on 65 65 the sodium and potassium blocking. For sodium block- 60 60 70 ers we have chosen the affinities, ks = 0.005(low), 0.05 55 on 55 60 50 50 (medium) and 0.1(high). For potassium blockers we have 50 45 45 chosen the affinities, kp = 0.005(low), 0.01 (medium) 40 40 40 on 35 35 30 and 0.05(high). The regions are different because with 30 30 20 25 the same magnitude of affinity potassium blockers affect

Spike Frequency (Hz) 25 20 20 10 the spiking activity more rapidly than sodium blockers as 0 0.002 0.004 0.006 15 15 10 10 seen comparing figures (3) and (4). Next for each affinity 5 5 we have arbitrarily chosen a spike from few initial spikes 0 0 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 and then compared it to the randomly selected spikes Affinity Affinity from intermediate and end positions of the spike trains FIG. 6: Spiking frequency: In figure (a) the spiking and plotted them in a same scale. frequency(Hz) of the action potentials in presence of Effect of Sodium Channel Only Blocker increasing sodium and potassium channel only blocking 40 Initial spike ks on = 0.0140 ks on = 0.05 40 ks on = 0.1 Intermediate b c affinity, kson and kpon have been plotted respectively, 20 Ending 20 20 ranging from 0.0001 to 0.07. The spiking frequency is 0 0 0 calculated over a long simulation run upto 20s. The -20 -20 -20 -40 -40 -40 squared-(black)-solid line and the diamond-(red)-dashed -60 -60 -60 Action Potential (mV) line shows the frequency of spiking of action potentials -80 -80 -80 14 16 18 20 22 14 16 18 20 22 14 16 18 20 22 in presence of only sodium and potassium channel Time(ms) Time(ms) Time(ms) blockers, respectively. In figure (b) the spiking Effect of Potassium Channel Only Blocker 40 40 kp = 0.01 40 kpon = 0.005 on kp on = 0.1 frequency profile is plotted for the dual type blockers 20 d 20 e 20 f for the cases: (i) kson > kpon: squared-(black)-solid 0 0 0 -20 -20 -20 line, (ii) kpon > kson: circled-(red)-dashed line and for -40 -40 -40 (iii) ks = kp : diamond-(blue)-dot dashed line. For on on -60 -60 -60 2 2 all the cases A = 200 µm and Iext =6.9 µA/cm and Action Potential (mV) -80 -80 -80 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 those spikes are only considered which have peak Time(ms) Time(ms) Time(ms) heights more than -10 mV. FIG. 7: Action potential duration: The temporal change of APD in presence of ion channel blockers have ity region the influence of the channel noise dominates been shown here. In the top traces, (a-c), the initial, over the ion conduction and thus the spiking activity in- intermediate and end point spikes are plotted in a same scale for sodium channel only blockers with affinity kson creases. After a certain kpon value, the spiking activity decreases as the decreased overall conductance dominates = 0.005(low), 0.05(medium) and 0.1(high ). In bottom here. For sodium channel only blockers, the over all con- traces, (d-f) similar plots have been done for potassium ductance always dominates over channel noise. channel only blockers with affinities, kpon = 0.005(low), 0.01 (medium) and 0.05(high). In both cases, A= 200 2 2 µm and Iext =6.9 µA/cm . The green-solid arrows are C. Action Potential Duration indicating the direction of shortening or broadening of the incoming action potential. Next we have seen the effect of channel blockers on the action potential duration(APD) itself. APD varies From figure (7) we have again found an interesting dif- from one neuron to another neuron type. Any alter- ference in APD for two types of blockers. It is seen that ation of APD of a particular neuron can lead to sig- for sodium channel only blockers with increasing time nificant complexities in signal transmission process and the repolarization process gets faster or the shortening can give rise to critical physiological disorders. We have of the APD occurs where as contrastingly, for potas- found that in presence of blockers APD significantly al- sium blockers the repolarization phase is seen to be de- 10 layed considerably with increasing APD. The shortening binding affinity of a particular drug. The figures of ac- of APD in presence of sodium blocker happens because tion potential trains for these three categories of blocking the effective number of sodium ions are entering the cell can be found in the supplemental figures (S2), (S3) and decreases with time and thus less number of potassium (S4). ions required to go out to bring back the repolarization Spiking Frequency: Now we have plotted the spik- which thus gradually takes lesser time than usual. On the ing frequency profile for these three cases in figure 6(b). other hand in presence of potassium blockers the repo- For the case of ks = kp (diamond-blue-dot-dashed larization phase is seen to be delayed temporally because on on line) it is seen that initially frequency decreases up to the number of available open potassium channels gradu- around ks =kp =0.001 and then passing through a ally decrease and thus the repolarization brought by the on on minimum it increases between a small region upto around decreased number of channels take longer time. Thus 0.004 and then a large decrease is observed until 0.01 is the broadening of APD occurs gradually. This shorten- reached. After that again an increase in frequency is ob- ing or the broadening of the APD is actually a special served until 0.03 and then it falls off gradually. These sort characteristic feature of sodium and potassium channel of double minimum and maximum in frequency of spiking blockers respectively which have great physiological sig- actually indicates a competition between overall sodium nificance and clinical use. Patients with longer or shorter and potassium ionic and channel noise activity. The re- APD due to mutagenic, hereditary or other physiological gions where the maxima exist are basically the regions conditions are treated with ion channel blockers. where the channel number induced spontaneous spiking activity dominates on overall ion conductance[24]. In other words it can be said that the maximums arise due Dual Blockers to the coherence resonance due to channel noise[23]. For the other two cases such as ks /kp ≈ 10(squared- Here we want to point out that some ion channel block- on on black-solid line) and kp /ks ≈ 10(circled-red-dashed ers such as local anesthetics are well known for their on on line), the previous trends of sodium and potassium only non-specific blocking nature. Also at an elevated con- blockers are observed as seen from figure 6(a). The case centration some drugs that primarily target Na chan- of ks = kp is different which indeed reduces to the nel may also seen to affect K channels. Channel spe- on on other two cases when the ratios become 10. However, cific type of blocking as discussed so far is more pro- for all the three cases it is seen that the action potential nounced for TTX(specifically binds to Na channel only) generation gradually ceases off with an the unsuitable and TEA(binds to potassium channel only) types of refactorization potential which clearly indicates that to- blockers only which are mostly used in experimental re- wards the end of the action potential train, potassium searches. But for local anesthetics or clinically used drugs channel blocking plays more influential role in the action we must consider both type of blocking simultaneously. potential termination process. For that purpose we have chosen three types of block- ing schemes which summarizes all possible kinds of non- Action Potential Duration: Next we have plotted specific binding mechanisms. For the first case we have the effect of these three types of drug blocking mecha- kept both the sodium(kson) and potassium(kpon) drug nisms on the duration of the action potential in figure binding affinities equal, i.e, kson = kpon. So these rep- (8) over one individual action potential train. For the resents those class of drugs which binds to both type kson > kpon case(the middle trace), we have found that of channels with equal affinities. For the second case initially the APD shortening occurs for few ms due to the we have chosen those types of drugs which have ap- dominant(kson 10 times stronger than kpon) blocking of proximately 10 times higher affinity of blocking sodium sodium channels over potassium channels. But shortly channels[12]. The major difference between local anes- after when sufficient amount of potassium channels are thetic action in K+ currents compared with Na+ cur- blocked, the effect of potassium blocking starts playing rents is the lower affinity(approximately 10 times lower) significant role by delaying APD. The inward arrow in in the former[12]. So here we have kept the sodium block- the middle trace of figure (8) shows the shortening of ing affinity, kson > kpon ≈ 10 times. Finally we kept APD followed by an outward arrow indicating the grad- kpon > kson ≈ 10 times. One can change the ratio ac- ual delay of APD as time progresses. We have verified cording to the need or according to the knowledge of the this for all affinity region. For higher affinity region, such 11

Effect of Local Anesthetics on Action Potential Duration ferent conformational states including the drug bound ks on = kpon ks on > kp on : ~10 times kp on > ks on : ~10 times 40 state. In the left traces of figure (9) the population(%) kp = 0.01 ks on = 0.01 ks on = 0.01 on 20 kp = 0.001 ks = 0.001 for sodium only blockers for affinity, kson= 0.1 and the kp on = 0.01 on on 0 corresponding population(%) of potassium channel states

-20 has been shown in right traces. Observing both the traces 0 simulation time t -40 we find that each of the action potential spike is associ-

-60 Action Potential (mV) ated with either upward or downward spike in all the

-80 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2515 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 population plots, both for sodium and potassium con- Time (ms) Time (ms) Time (ms) formational states. This indicates that sudden random FIG. 8: Action potential duration affected by action potential generation is associated with sudden dra- dual blockers: The change in the duration of the matic changes of the entire population occupancy of all action potential in presence of local anesthetic channel the conformational states. From the left trace of figure blockers at a higher affinity over their individual course (9) we see that in 20 seconds( although spikes occurring of action potntial train have been plotted for the cases ceases long ago) only ∼50% channels are trapped in drug bound state, DS which slowly increases with time. The kson = kpon(left), kson > kpon(middle) and rest of the population is mainly trapped in the inactive kpon > kson(right). The approximate positions of the five randomly chosen spikes over a train of action states and closed states. With increasing affinity the drug potential simulation run of t ms are shown in the inset bound state populates in a faster rate. 2 of middle figure. Here also A= 200 µm and Iext =6.9 Sodium Channel Only Blocker, ks on = 0.1, A= 200, Iext = 6.9 2 Population(%) of Na+ Channel Conformational States Population(%) of K+ Channel Conformational States µA/cm . 30 30 0 Vm (mV) 0 Vm (mV) -30 -30 -60 -60 80 60 [ m h ] 40 0 0 15 20 10 0 [n ] 5 0 as kson = 0.1, the broadening of APD occurs, preceded 40 [ m 1 h 0 ] 0 20 0 40 by a quick APD shortening. However, here we want to 30 30 20 [ m 2 h 0 ] 20 [n 1 ] 10 10 0 0 point out that the shape of action potentials in this case 80 60 40 [n ] 40 [ m 3 h 0 ] 2 20 35 have been found to be heavily affected such as the grad- 0 30 30 20 25 10 [ m 0 h 1 ] ual decrease of the peak height of action potentials as 0 50 [n ] 15 [ m h 1 ] 40 3 10 1 30 5 time progresses(see supplemental figure S3). Keeping the 0 20 15 10 10 [ m 2 h 1 ] peaks fixed we have found that the initial upward depo- 5 30 0 20 [n 4 ] 15 [ m h ] 10 3 1 10 larization phase of action potentials also changes signif- 5 0 0 icantly, as seen in the left portion of the peak in the 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 100 110 80 Total Population Total Population middle trace. So the change of APD here, particularly 60 100 40 [ DS ] 20 0 90 in this case is considered as the peak after shortening or 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 Time(ms) Time(ms) broadening. In the right trace, the case kpon > kson is shown which shows exactly similar nature of APD broad- FIG. 9: Gating dynamics in presence of sodium ening as shown in potassium channel only blocking case only blocker: The action potential and the in figures 7(d-f). For the kson = kpon case in left trace, corresponding population of every sodium(left traces) although the frequency response curve came up with dif- and potassium(right traces) channel conformational ferent signature but for the duration of the action po- states are plotted for sodium channel only blocker with 2 2 tential it basically displays the potassium blocking dom- kson= 0.1 at A= 200.0 µm and Iext= 6.9 µA/cm . inance by delaying action potential duration. Following Table(II) summarizes our results: Next we have plotted every population(%) of the sodium and potassium channel states in presence of potassium only blockers in left and right traces of fig-

ure (10) respectively for kpon = 0.1. It is very aston- D. Gating Dynamics ishing to see that the trends of population dynamics has been drastically changed from that of the sodium Here we have studied the percentage of the total pop- only blockers in figure (9). They show different occu- ulation of channels present at a particular time in dif- pancy dynamics. It clearly says that different types of 12

Blocking mechanism Spiking Frequency APD Sodium channel only blocking Exponential decrease Shortening occurs Potassium channel only blocking Initially increase and then decrese Broadening occurs Equal affinity :kson = kpon Maxima and minima arises Broadening occurs(potassium blocking dominates) Preferential sodium blocking :kson > kpon Exponential decrease APD shortens initially, then broadening occurs Preferential potassium blocking :kson < kpon Initially increase and then decrese Broadening occurs

TABLE II: Various blocking mechanism and their effect on spiking frequency and action potential duration(APD). blocking agents can considerably change the gating dy- V. OUR KINETIC DRUG BLOCKING MODEL namics of the system. This inference is consistent with VERSUS OTHER STUDIES IN THE the earlier literature[13, 47]. It is a very important re- LITERATURE alization which could be obtained only from a Markov model oriented studies like this. Another interesting fea- Hodgkin-Huxley squid axon model is a very basic rep- ture is that the population of the drug bound state, DP resentation of a neuronal cell. Since 1952 many Markov very rapidly grows towards 100% for kon=0.1, unlike the models with more coupled states or more complexities sodium only blocking. The sodium channel population have come up that mimic the biological responses more is mostly trapped in m3h0 state, which is a closed state. accurately. But due to the diverse nature of living cell The altered gating dynamics and hampered membrane types there exist different types of models for differ- potential originating from disrupted ion conduction in ent systems. In this paper our goal is to understand presence of blockers make them trapped in this state, as kinetically how the ion channel blockers affect a neu- already discussed in Section III. This is a cross verifica- ronal cell, in general. Besides it is simply not possible tion of our previous statement. to study all kinds of model and compare them. As we are looking at two criteria mainly: the variety of firing rate dynamics that can be reproduced and the shape of ext Potassium Channel Only Blocker, kpon = 0.1, A= 200, I = 6.9 Population(%) of Na+ Channel Conformational States Population(%) of K+ Channel Conformational States action potentials affected by ion channel blockers, the 40 40 0 0 -40 Vm (mV) -40 Vm (mV) -80 -80 Hodgkin-Huxley(HH) model is a well accepted model[48] 90 15 [ m h ] [n ] 60 0 0 10 0 30 in this regard compared to threshold models such as 0 5 60 40 [ m 1 h 0 ] 0 the Leaky Integrate and Fire(LIF)[49] or the Izhike- 20 0 30 [n 1 ] 40 20 30 [ m h ] vich model(IZH) [50], Morris-Lecar model[51], FitzHuge- 20 2 0 10 10 0 0 100 40 75 [n ] Nugamo(FHN)[52] because the parameters of the HH 50 [ m 3 h 0 ] 2 25 20 0 40 model have biophysical significance. Moreover one can [ m h ] 20 0 1 0 0 45 [n ] modify the original model parameters to easily include 15 30 3 10 [ m 1 h 1 ] 5 15 0 0 the cell response of different systems[53]. The stochastic 15 [ m h ] 10 2 1 40 [n 4 ] drug binding approach on HH model is a very good choice 5 20 0 0 [ m h ] since it is capable of bringing out the essential physiolog- 20 3 1 100 [ D P ] 10 80 ical features of ion channel blocking phenomena which 0 60 110 Total Population 40 Total Population corresponds to many experimental observations till date 100 20 90 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 tested on different types of systems. In the following we Time(ms) Time(ms) present the references of such experiments done. FIG. 10: Gating dynamics in presence of potassium only blocker: The action potential and 1. Broadening of APD: From the study of potas- the corresponding population(%) of every sodium(left sium only blockers and the local anesthetic block- traces) and potassium(right traces) channel ing that have more blocking potency to potassium conformational states are plotted for potassium only channel than sodium blockers(case of kpon > kson), 2 blocker with kon= 0.1 at A= 200.0 µm and Iext= 6.9 we have seen that these blockers tend to broaden µA/cm2. or delay the action potential duration. There exist lots of experimental evidences that support this finding. TEA, 4-AP(4-Aminopyridine), CTX 13

(charybdotoxin) etc mainly known for potassium cells. We just mention that cardiac cells also show channel blocking potency show broadening of ac- similar effects as the neuronal cells show in presence tion potential in demyelinated rat sciatic nerve[46], of channel blockers. rat hippocampal pyramidal cell[26], rat superior 4. Altered gating dynamics: The state transi- cervical sympathetic neurons[27], on supraoptic tions that underlay the gating process(opening, neurons[28], on Hippocampal CA3 Neurons[29] and closing or inactivation etc) are altered by local mammalian central neurons[30]. The effect of Den- anesthetics[13] and that such altered gating itself drotoxin, a potassium blocker from mamba snakes, becomes the essential modulator of local anesthetic on cerebellar basket cells, has also shown a delayed block[47]. From the results discussed for gating dy- action potential duration[31]. namics in figure (9) and (10), we have also shown 2. Multiple spike discharge: It is also verified that that the sodium and potassium blockers have very 4-AP can lead to multiple spike discharge, spon- distinct population dynamics. Thus both type of taneous impulse activity and alteration of refrac- drugs drastically change the gating dynamics. tory periods[46]. These results are totally con- sistent with our frequency response curves in fig- A. Comparison Between Langevin and Markov ure (6) and action potential plots in presence of Model Simulation potassium blockers. From the figure 4(b) and (c) we can also see that the spike train shows The transient properties such as spiking interval, co- sudden spontaneous and enhanced spiking density efficient of variation of spiking due to channel block- temporally(spike train seen to be very dense) as ers has been studied using Langevin description of also seen in ERG-K+ channel blockade[32] and stochasticity[24] in HH model. Here we have provided a ABP(Ankyrin-binding peptide) blockade on Neu- brief comparative study between the original determinis- ral KCNQ(Kv7) channels[33]. The effect of chan- tic description of HH model using gating variables(m,h,n nel blockers on effective ionic current loop is also without white noise terms added), Langevin descrip- consistent with literature[29]. tion(equation 3) used in reference [24] and our Gillespie 3. Shortening of APD: On the other hand the simulation of HH-Markov chain model used in this pa- shortening of action potential duration in presence per. Ignoring the channel noise fluctuation we want to of sodium channel blockers is more pronounced see how close the Langevin[24] and Gillespie simulation for cardiac cells, as far as our literature survey we adapted matches each other with or without the pres- is concerned. Shortening of the action potential ence of blockers. In Langevin description the dynamics by ion channel blockers has been observed in sev- of the gating variables are considered to be stochastic as eral systems like sheep cardiac purkinje fibers[34], follows, in rabbit cardiac Purkinje fibers[35], in dog ven- z˙ = αz(V )(1 − z) − βz(V )z + ηz(t), (3) tricular cardiomyocytes[36], in guinea pig ventric- ular myocytes[37] etc. Antiarrhythmic agents such where z = n,m,h. n represents the potassium and m and as Lidocaine, Phenytoin, Mexiletine, Tocainide etc h together represents sodium gating dynamics as consid-

sodium channel blockers shortens the action poten- ered by Hodghkin-Huxley originally. ηz(t)(s) are inde- tial duration[38]. Antiarrhythmic agents such as pendent Gaussian white noise which makes the sodium bretylium, amiodarone, ibutilide, sotalol etc pre- and potassium gating dynamics stochastic in nature. The dominantly block the potassium channels, thereby strength of the individual noises are given as follows[24]: prolonging repolarization[38]. The mechanism of ′ 2 αz(V )βz(V ) ′ cardiac cells are quiet different due to the presence < ηz(t)ηz(t ) >= δ(t − t ), (4) Ni [αz(V )+ βz(V )] of other important types of ion channels and also where i = N for z=m and h and i = N for z=n. The the shape and length of action potential is quite Na K blocking of sodium and potassium channel conductance different than neuronal cell . We do not compare are considered as fractional conductance[24] as follows, our simple Hodgkin-Huxley action potential result max 4 max 3 to the cardiac action potentials. Hodgkin-Huxley GK (V,t)= gK xK n and GNa(V,t)= gNa xNam h, model shows good agreement with the neuronal (5) 14

Comparison Between Deterministic-HH, Langevin & Gillespie-Markov Simulation where the factors xK and xNa are the fractions of working 100 100 100 a Deterministic b Deterministic c Deterministic or unblocked ion channels to the overall number of potas- 80 Langevin, A = 2,000 80 Langevin, A = 20,000 80 Langevin, A = 20,000 60 Gillespie, A = 2,000 60 Gillespie, A = 20,000 60 Gillespie, A = 20,000 40 40 No Drug I = 6.9 Potassium OnlyBlocker sium and sodium channels, respectively. 0 < xK/Na ≤ 1. I ext = 0.0 ext 40 20 20 20 xK = 0.1 No Drug kp on = 0.5 Solving the conductance equation (5) and equation (1) 0 0 0 -20 -20 -20 one obtains the action potential using this Langevin type -40 -40 -40 Action Potential (mV) -60 -60 -60 of description. Iext = 6.9 -80 -80 -80 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 20 40 60 80 Similarity: From figure 11(a) it is seen that with- Time(ms) Time(ms) Time(ms) out the presence of drug and stimulus both Langevin FIG. 11: Comparison between original and Markov description matches the deterministic-HH Deterministic-HH, Stochastic Langevin and description when channel number fluctuation is ignored Markov-Gillespie drug binding schemes: channel with high patch size which also validates that our noise ignored: In figure (a) the action potential simulation-code results to be correct. Next in figure (b) generated from Deterministic-HH, Langevin and we have shown that the Gillespie and Langevin model Markovian simulations has been compared with out the even in presence of stimulus, matches each other when presence of drug and external current and channel the channel noise is ignored. However as the external noise. In figure (b) similar plot has been done in current is applied the determiistic match requires higher presence of an external current. In figure (c) we have patch size, such as A= 20,000 µm2. Next, in figure (c) we compared three results in presence of very high have compared the models in presence of high drug bind- potassium channel blocking affinity. ing affinity(for example, we showed the potassium block- ing case here only). In high patch size where the channel noise is ignored it is expected that the Langevin approach channels, thereby assuming that during the time of ob- should produce similar result to that of the model we con- servation, the number of blocked channels do not change, sidered having high drug binding affinity. Now as seen or as if the drug binding kinetics is in a standby mode. from figure(c), we find that for obvious reason the origi- Actually in real situation during the course of obser- nal deterministic-HH description matches with Langevin vation the available number of open channels or num- description exactly showing that the action potentials, at ber of blocked channels change due to the drug binding. this very high blockade region(x =0.1), quickly damps K With higher affinity the channels are blocked in a faster down and as the refactorization is hampered no further rate and vice verse. This is the main reason why the spikes could regenerate. Now this result is compared to Langevin approach can not show the gradual change in the very high affinity region of our model with kp =0.5. on shape or APD with time. As the Langevin approach does We can see that the Langevin simulation shows simi- not have any specific states of the channel(closed, open lar trend of action potential termination as our Markov or inactivated state etc) a lot of information regarding model does. Although they do not match each other ex- the population dynamics, altered gating dynamics is lost actly, not expected to match each other either(blocking which makes our Markov model approach a better alter- schemes are very different) but their nature is mostly native for studying kinetic drug blocking model. Most same. Thus our model reduces to the Langevin model importantly, the intricate details of various drug binding to an extent. The difference in the termination poten- schemes such as closed or inactivated state blocking etc tial arises due to their inherent model differences. The can also be adapted and implemented using simple con- termination potential in Langevin scheme is around -30 sideration of suitable drug-bound states which are not mV which is also unsuitable for further action potential possible in the Langevin approach. Also the Gillespie generation. simulation of Markov model gives the opportunity to cal- Difference: The difference between the Langevin culate the population of individual states which opens the scheme and our Markov scheme of drug binding is that door of carrying out various nonequilibrium thermody- the Langevin scheme discards a certain fraction of the namical analysis[54, 55] such as entropy production rates, total number of sodium or potassium channel and their free energy change etc of different binding schemes also. contribution to the total conduction from the patch at In short our Markov model based study has some ad- the very beginning. The action potentials are then cal- vantages over Langevin approach in the context of state culated on the basis of remaining number of available specific ion channel blockade. 15

VI. CONCLUSION 2. We have also shown two distinct types of spik- ing trends in presence of two types of blockers. The definite presentation of specific channel states in For sodium blocker we observe that the spiking the Markov model helps to describe not only the macro- frequency falls off exponentially with the increas- scopic current contributing for the action potential, but ing binding affinity. In contrast, with increasing also the probability and transitions of each channel state, potassium blocking affinity, initially the spiking fre- which gives a mechanistic and detailed link between the quency increases towards a maximum and then it whole-cell action potential and the structure or function gradually falls off exponentially. This initial in- of ion channels. Thus Markovian simulation is an essen- crease in spiking activity arises due to the domi- tial part of modern day model based elcetrophysiological nance of increased internal potassium channel num- and pharmaceutical investigations. Here we have tried ber fluctuations or channel noise over total ionic to understand how one can theoretically bring out the conductances. In case of local anesthetics or dual essential features of ion channel blocking. By the suit- blockers where the drugs have equal binding affin- able adaption of Gillespie algorithm along with the direct ity to both the channels, show multiple maxima in numerical simulation of voltage dynamics we have been spiking frequency trend. A drug with more binding able to show how a simple extension of Hodgkin-Huxley affinity to a particular channel shows similar spik- model can prove to be an important tool to understand ing frequency trends as in the case of only sodium the effect of ion channel blockers to predict the impor- or potassium blockers. However there exists a crit- tant drug binding features like altered spiking frequency, ical value of affinity for potassium channels above altered duration of action potential of a neuronal cell and which irrespective of mechanisms all spiking activ- altered gating dynamics etc. This study establishes a link ity is destroyed due to incomplete re-factorization between the theoretical understanding of drug binding process. kinetics and the observed experimental findings[26–38]. Our study gives an opportunity to further investigate dif- ferent types of drug binding features that can originate 3. Both the sodium and potassium blocking agents from other types of drugs such as closed state blockers considerably changes the gating and population dy- or inactive-state blockers. The major conclusions of this namics of the system which we could show using our study in kinetic drug binding scenario is as follows. description.

1. In the case of only sodium channel blocking al- 4. Our approach satisfactorily agrees as well as pro- though the spiking activity decreases with blocking vides suitable explanation regarding the experi- affinity, the train of action potentials generated are mentally observed change in action potential du- of complete shape because there are plenty of ac- ration in presence of channel blockers. Sodium tive potassium channels available to bring the sys- channel blockers shorten the action potential dura- tem back to its resting state. However, in case of tion and the potassium blockers delays it. However potassium blocking at higher value of binding affin- in case of dual type blockers we have shown that ity, due to the lack of active potassium channels potassium blockers play influential role by prolong- the shape of action potential at the end can not ing the repolarization process ultimately. complete. Consequently the re-factorization pro- cess gets hampered which eventually affects the sodium channel activation process to regenerate more spiking activity. In case of sodium channel Thus using our basic mechanisms of ion channel block- blockers spiking activity slowly decreases mainly ing one can develop a systematic understanding of the due to absence of adequate number of available physiological effects of channel blockers for simple neu- open sodium channels, where as in case of potas- ronal cell with sufficient details which opens the possi- sium channel blockers the repolarization leading to bility of exploring many other important drug binding re-factorization process plays a vital role in destroy- features with the incorporation of desired level of struc- ing spike generation process. tural and functional details. 16

Appendix transition is taking place. As for example, the transi-

tion from the state m1h0 to m2h0 has the propensity,

A1: Gillespie Algorithm for Site Selective Ion aNa(m1h0 → m2h0)=2αmNm1h0 . Similarly for potas- Channel Blocking sium channel the propensity for the transition between

n3 to n4 is given by, aK (n3 → n4)=2αnNn3 . Only the To consider site selective binding of sodium or potas- backward transitions from DNa or DK , the propensities sium blockers in a single neuron the Gillespie’s algorithm has been given a constant value as mentioned earlier. we used to study the drug binding kinetics has been This way we calculate 30 propensities corresponding to implemented using the following steps. 30 reactions.

5. Next we calculate the total propensity, aT by sum- ming over all the propensities as calculated in the previ- 1. Initially we have fixed the number of sodium and ous step. The sum can be expressed simply for sodium potassium channels to be simulated. NNa = ρNaA and channel blockers as, NK = ρK A are the numbers of sodium and potassium 2 22 8 ion channels in a particular patch of area A µm with ν ν −2 aT = aNa + aK . sodium channel density, ρNa= 60 µm and potassium "ν=1 # "ν=1 # −2 X X channel density, ρK = 18 µm [23] . and for potassium channel blockers, 2. Then at a resting membrane potential, i.e. at - 70 mV the steady state values of the gating variables 20 10 ν ν n,m and h are solved using the following steady state aT = aNa + aK . "ν=1 # "ν=1 # equations[17], X X 6. Next we calculate the random time required for the αn αm αh n = ,m = and h = . (6) next transition to occur by calculating τ, given as αn + βn αm + βm αh + βh 1 3. Next at t=0 we have assigned the population of the τ = ln(1/r1), aT drug-bound state, DNa/K = 0 for respective sodium and potassium blocker simulations. All the other 13 states where r1 is a pseudo-random number called from an uni- are binomially distributed[40], form distribution[0,1]. As soon as the τ is obtained, the time is incremented by t = t + τ. 3 − − N kj = hk(1 − h)(1 k)mj (1 − m)(3 j)N , 7. In the next step we calculate which one of the 30 Na j Na   reactions has taken place in that τ time. An integer µ is assigned which designates the transition number. So 4 − N j = nj(1 − n)(4 j)N , (7) µ varies from 1 to 30 in our case including the drug- K j K   binding step. Then another random number, r2 from an uniform distribution[0,1] of unit interval is called. Then where N kj and N j denotes the population of the states Na K we calculate the quantity, (r × a ). Then the transition where k number of h gates, j number of m gates for 2 T number µ is calculated using the following relation sodium channel and j number of n gates for potassium kj j µ−1 µ channels are open. Here NNa and NK are integers which ν ν fluctuate around their expected values. aNa/K < (r2 × aT ) ≤ aNa/K. ν=1 ν=1 4. Then we put an initial voltage of -60 mV and start X X the simulation for a paticular value of Iext. First we This is actually adding the successive propensities, such calculate the individual propensities, aK (nj → nj′ ) for as aNa(m0h0 → m1h0) + aNa(m1h0 → m0h0) + potassium ion channel and aNa(mj hk → mj′ hk′ ) for aNa(m1h0 → m2h0) + aNa(m2h0 → m1h0) + ..... + sodium channels of all the 30 reactions (including the aK (n0 → n1)+ aK (n1 → n0)+ aK (n1 → n2)+ aK (n2 → drug-bound state). Here (mj hk → mh′ kj′ ) or(nj → nj′ ) n1)+.... under the µ do-loop (µ = 1 to 30) until their sum indicates the transition between neighboring states. The is equal or just exceed (r2 × aT ), and the loop number propensities aNa(mj hk → mj′ hk′ ) or aK (nj → nj′ ) for index or the transition index, µ is then set equal to the individual transitions are expressed as the transition rate loop index or transition number index of the last aν term multiplied by the population of the state from which the added. This is how the reaction taken place is identified. 17

ν ν 8. As soon as the reaction number index, µ is iden- aNa/K (t) = aNa/K (X(t)) the Gillespie algorithm calcu- tified, the population of the states associated with that lates the time until the next transition takes place by reaction is updated by ±1. The population of the state considering the first transition time of Rν (total number from which the transition occurred is updated with -1 of transitions) time homogeneous transitions. How- and the population of the state where to the transition ever, as the transition rates become time dependent, has occurred is updated with +1. the first firing time has to be calculated from Rν time- 9. Then the sodium and potassium conductances inhomogeneous transitions. The amount of time that are calculated using equation 2 and the corresponding must pass until the next transition takes place, τ, is given sodium,INa and potassium , IK ionic currents are given by the distribution function[56]: by the equation Rν t+τ ν IK = GK (V,t)(V −EK ) and INa = GNa(t)(V −ENa). 1 − exp − aNa/K (X(t),s)ds , (9) ν=1 t (8)  X Z  10. Then membrane potential is simply integrated where X(t) is constant in the above integrals as no reac- with the calculated time step τ as follows, tions take place within the time interval [t,t + τ). Using

1 the above equation, τ is obtained by first letting r1 be Vi = Vi−1 + [(Iext − Iint)τ] , Cm uniform(0,1) and then solving the following equation: where Iint = IK + INa + IL. Rν t+τ 11. Then again the process is repeated from step 4, ν aNa/K (X(t),s)ds = ln(1/r1). (10) with the new value of membrane potential and updated ν=1 t X Z transition rates and propensities at the obtained value of Then the transition that occurs at that time is chosen membrane potential, V. ν according to the probabilities[56] aNa/K(X(t),t + τ)/aT , 12. To calculate the spike frequency of action poten- Rν ν where aT = a (X(t),t + τ). So it is seen tials we run the program for a very long time and then ν=1 Na/K that this time dependent case is very different from convert the spike number in Hz unit. P the time homogeneous case which are most frequently Using the above mentioned algorithm we have written used in literature where τ is exponentially distributed as a Fortran 90 code and complied in GFORTRAN to P (τ) = aT (X(t)exp − aT (X(t))τ , where aT (X(t)) = study the physiological effect of drug binding on action ν R aν (X(t)) and the probability that the next re- potentials. ν=1 Na/K   action is ν-th reaction is given as aν (X(t))/a (X(t)). P Na/K T However, solving equation(10) by both analytically and numerically is extremely hard and time consuming. Ow- A2: Time Dependent Propensity vs. Constant ing to the difficulty of solving equation (10) one can by- Propensity pass it by using next reaction method or modified next reaction method[56]. However those methods are also Here we want to mention that the method that we restricted to very few number of channels. The rigorous have adapted for the calculation of the propensities Gillespie algorithm remains a challenge for the stochastic is a very popular and widely used method and of- Hodgkin-Huxley model. For very low patch size where ten claimed to be an exact method for simulating ac- very few number of channels are considered the Gille- tion potenial using Gillespie algorithm. However con- spie algorithm with constant propensity assumption is trary to this popular belief this method is not an ex- very questionable, indeed it is wrong. However, for many act method. In systems where the rate constants or channels with very large total propensity of a large popu- the transition rates are time dependent through volt- lation of channels the typical τ becomes so small that one age change[kz(V (t)), k = α or β,z = m,n,h] or change can consider propensities to be approximately constant. with time due to temperature change or volume change, The larger is the number of ion channels the better the propensity functions does not remain constant between approximation works. The reason of this brief discussion ν ν reactions, i.e. aNa/K (t)= aNa/K (X(t),t), where X(t)= is to just inform the readers that the widely claimed ex- {[m0h0](t), .., [m3h1](t), [n0](t), .., [n4](t)} is the popula- act one is basically an approximate method, not exact tion state vector of different states[56]. When the propen- method. It diverges from the true action potential tra- sity functions depend only on the state of the system i.e. jectories as time propagates(as seen using Morris-Lecar 18 model in reference [57]) for sufficiently small number of sity and time dependent propensity readers are advised channels. Although it is not at all bad for a patch size to read the following three references: [56–58]. of A= 200µm2. We have used the constant propensity method. The results with this much of patch area is negli- gibly affected and moreover our aim is to understand how Acknowledgment the physiological effects of drug blocking can be obtained in general. Theoretical development on exact simulation K. Pal wants to thank the anonymous referees for their is not our focus here. For better understanding about valuable suggestions and The Department of Biotechnol- the discussion between the piece wise constant propen- ogy, Govt. of India for fellowship.

[1] F. M. Ashcroft, From molecule to malady, Nature 440, Pal and G. Gangopadhyay, Probing kinetic drug binding 440 (2006). mechanism in voltage-gated sodium ion channel, open [2] B. Hille, Ionic channels of excitable membranes (2nd state versus inactive state blockers, Channels 9(5), 307 edition), (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass., 1992). (2015). [3] J. J. Clare, Functional expression of ion channels in [13] G. K. Wang and G. R. Strichartz, State-dependent inhi- mammalian systems. J. J. Clare and D.T. Trezise (Eds.) bition of sodium channels by local anesthetics: A 40-year Expression and Analysis of Recombinant Ion Channels, evolution, Biochem. (Mosc) Suppl. Ser. A Membr. Cell (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, p 79, 2006). Biol. 6, 120 (2012). [4] S. Gilman, Neurobiology of disease, (Academic Press, p [14] K. N. Piasta, D. L. Theobald , C. Miller, Potassium- 319, 2007). selective block of barium permeation through single KcsA [5] G. F. Ballester, A. F. Carvajal, J. M. Gonzalez-Ros and channels, J. Gen. Physiol. 138, 421 (2011); A. F. Montiel, Ionic channels as targets for drug design, D. J. Posson, J. G. McCoy and C. M. Nimigean, The A review on computational methods, Pharmaceutics 3, voltage-dependent gate in MthK potassium channels is 932 (2011). located at the selectivity filter, Nature Structural & [6] W. A. Catterall, Sodium channels, inherited epilepsy, Molecular Biology 20, 159 (2013); and antiepileptic drugs, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. R. Guo , W. Zeng, H. Cui, L. Chen and S. Ye, Ionic 54, 317 (2014). interactions of Ba2+ blockades in the MthK K+ channel, [7] T. Narahashi, J. W. Moore and W. R. Scott, J. Gen. Physiol. 144, 193 (2014). Tetrodotoxin blockage of sodium conductance increase [15] Y. Rudy and J. R. Silva, Computational biology in the in Lobster giant axons, J. Gen. Physiol. 47, 965 (1964). study of cardiac ion channels and cell electrophysiology. [8] G. M. Lipkind and H. A. Fozzard, Molecular modeling Q. Rev. Biophys. 39, 57 (2006); of local anesthetic drug binding by voltage-gated sodium C. E. Clancy , Z. I. Zhu and Y. Rudy, Pharmacogenetics channels, Mol. Pharmacol. 68, 1611 (2005). and anti arrhythmic drug therapy, a theoretical investi- [9] D. B. Tikhonov and B. S. Zhorov, Mechanism of sodium gation, Am. J. Physiol. Heart. Circ. Physiol. 292, H66 channel block by local anesthetics, antiarrhythmics, and (2007); anticonvulsants, J. Gen. Physiol. 149, 465 (2017). M. Fink and D. Noble, Markov models for ion channels: [10] S. I. Judge and C. T. Bever, Potassium channel blockers versatility versus identifiability and speed, Phil. Trans. in multiple sclerosis: neuronal Kv channels and effects of R. Soc. A 367, 2161 (2009); symptomatic treatment, Pharmacology and Therapeu- Y. Y. Vladimir, T. W. Allen, C. E. Clancy, Computa- tics 111, 224 (2006). tional models for predictive cardiac ion channel pharma- [11] T. J. Campbell, K. R. Wyse and R. Pallandi, Differen- cology, Drug Discovery Today: Disease Models 14, 3 tial effects on action potential of class IA, B and C an- (2014). tiarrhythmic drugs: modulation by stimulation rate and [16] A. Nekouzadeh and Y. Rudy, Statistical properties of extracellular KC concentration, Clinc. Exp. Pharmacol. ion channel records. Part I. Relationship to the macro- Physiol. 18, 533 (1991). scopic current, J. Math. Biosci.210, 291 (2007); A. Nek- [12] A. Scholz, Mechanisms of (local) anaesthetics on voltage- ouzadeh and Y. Rudy, Statistical properties of ion chan- gated sodium and other ion channels. Br. J. Anaesth. nel records. Part II. Estimation from the macroscopic 89, 52 (2002); H. A. Fozzard and G. M. Lipkind, The current, J. Math. Biosci.210, 315 (2007). tetrodotoxin binding site is within the outer vestibule of [17] A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley, A quantitative descrip- the sodium channel, Marine Drugs 8, 219 (2010); K. tion of membrane current and its application to conduc- 19

tion and excitation in nerve, J. Physiol. 117, 500 (1952). [32] F. Gullo et al., ERG K + channel blockade enhances [18] L. J. DeFelice and W. N. Goolsby, Order from random- firing and epinephrine secretion in rat chromaffin cells: ness, spontaneous firing from stochastic properties of ion the missing link to LQT2-related sudden death?, The channels: Fluctuations and Order, The New Synthesis, FASEB Journal 17, 330 (2003). M. Millonas, editor, (Springer, New York. p 331-342, [33] D. A. Brown and G. M. Passmore, Neural KCNQ (Kv7) 1996). channels, British Journal of Pharmacology 156, 1185 [19] J. Clay and L. DeFelice, Relationship between membrane (2009). excitability and single channel open-close kinetics, Bio- [34] E. Carmeliet and T. Saikawa, Shortening of the action phys. J. 42, 151-157 (1983). potential and reduction of pacemaker activity by Lido- [20] A. Strassberg and L. J. DeFelice, Limitations of the caine, Quinidine, and Procainamide in Sheep Cardiac Hodgkin-Huxley formalism, effects of single channel ki- Purkinje Fibers, An effect on Na or K Currents? Circ netics on transmembrane voltage dynamics, Neural Com- Res. 50, 257 (1982). putation 5, 843 (1993). [35] T. J. Colatsky, Mechanisms of action of lidocaine and [21] J. T. Rubinstein, Threshold fluctuations in an N sodium quinidine on action potential duration in rabbit cardiac channel model of the node of Ranvier, Biophys. J. 68, Purkinje fibers. An effect on steady state sodium cur- 779 (1995). rents? Circ. Res. 50, 17 (1982). [22] P. Jung and J. W. Shuai, Optimal sizes of ion channel [36] A. Szabo et al., Effects of Ropivacaine on action potential clusters, Europhysics Letters 56, 29 (2001). configuration and ion currents in isolated canine ventric- [23] G. Schmid, I. Goychuk and P. H¨anggi, Stochastic reso- ular cardiomyocytes, Anesthesiology 108, 693 (2008). nance as a collective property of ion channel assemblies, [37] Y. Song and L. Belardinelli, Basal late sodium current Europhys. Lett. 56, 22 (2001); is a significant contributor to the duration of action po- P. H¨anggi, G. Schmid and I. Goychuk, Excitable mem- tential of guinea pig ventricular myocytes, Physiol. Rep. branes: Channel noise, synchronization, and stochastic 5(10), e13295 (2017). resonance, Advances in Solid State Physics 42, 359 [38] A. J. Trevor and B. G. Katzung et al., Katzung and (2002); Trevor’s Pharmacology Examination and Board Review, G. Schmid, I. Goychuk and P. H¨anggi, Channel noise (Chapter 14, 11e: McGraw-Hill Education (2015) and and synchronization in excitable membranes, Physica A 12e: McGraw-Hill Medical(2012), New York). 325, 165 (2003). M. Perez-Neut, V. Rao, L. Haar , K. W. Jones and S. [24] G. Schmid, I. Goychuk and P. H¨anggi, Effect of channel Gentile, Current and potential antiarrhythmic drugs tar- block on the spiking activity of excitable membranes in geting voltage-gated cardiac ion channels, Cardiol. Phar- a stochastic Hodgkin-Huxley model, Phys. Biol. 1, 61 macol. 4, 139 (2015). (2004). [39] R. F. Fox, Stochastic versions of the Hodgkin-Huxley [25] D. T. Gillespie, Exact stochastic simulation of coupled equations, Biophys. J. 72, 2069 (1997); chemical reactions, J. Phys. Chem. 81, 2340 (1977). R. F. Fox and Y. Lu, Emergent collective behavior in [26] J. F. Storm, Action potential repolarization and a large numbers of globally coupled independently stochas- fast after-hyperpolarization in rat hippocampal pyrami- tic ion channels, Phys. Rev. E 49, 3421 (1994). dal cells, J. Physiol. 385, 733 (1987). [40] E. Skaugen and L. Walløe, Firing behaviour in a stochas- [27] S. J. Marsh and D. A. Brown, Potassium currents con- tic nerve membrane model based upon the Hodgkin- tributing to action potential repolarization in dissociated Huxley equations, L. Acta Physiol. Scand. 107, 343 cultured rat superior cervical sympathetic neurons, Neu- (1979). roscience Letters 133, 298 (1991). [41] A. Manwani, P. N. Steinmetz and C. Koch, Channel [28] M. D. Hlubek and P. Cobbett, Differential effects of K+ Noise in Excitable Neuronal Membranes, Advances in channel blockers on frequency-dependent action poten- neural information processing systems 12, S. A. Solla, T. tial broadening in supraoptic neurons, Brain Research K. Leen and K. R. Muller (eds.), (MIT Press, pp. 143- Bulletin 53, 203 (2000). 149, 2000). [29] J. Mitterdorfer and B. P. Bean, Potassium currents dur- [42] C. Koch, Biophysics of computation, (Oxford University ing the action potential of Hippocampal CA3 neurons, J. Press, New York, pp. 202-210, 1999). Neurosci. 22, 10106 (2002). [43] C. C. Chow and J. A. White, Spontaneous action poten- [30] B. P. Bean, The action potential in mammalian central tials due to channel fluctuations, Biophys. J. 71, 3013 neurons, Nature Reviews, Neuroscience 8, 451 (2007). (1996). [31] R. Begum, Y. Bakiri, K. E. Volynski and D. M. Kull- [44] H. I. Mino, J. T. Rubinstein and J. A. White, Compari- mann, Action potential broadening in a presynaptic son of algorithms for the simulation of action potentials channelopathy, Nat. Commun. 6(7), 12102 (2016). with stochastic sodium channels, Annals of Biomedical 20

Engineering 30, 578 (2002). response of a voltage gated sodium ion channel and bio- [45] D. E Becker and K. L. Reed, Local anesthetics: Review physical characterization of dynamic hysteresis, J. of of pharmacological considerations, Anesth. Prog. 59, 90 Theoretical Biology 415, 113 (2017). (2012); [55] Hao Ge and Hong Qian, Physical origins of entropy pro- O. Afolabi, A. Murphy, B. Chung and D. Lalonde, The duction, free energy dissipation, and their mathematical effect of buffering on pain and duration of local anesthetic representations, Phys. Rev. E 81, 051133 (2010). in the face: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial, [56] D. F. Anderson, A modified next reaction method Can. J. Plast. Surg. 21, 209 (2013); for simulating chemical systems with time dependent G. B. Silva and et.al, Duration and efficacy of differ- propensities and delays, J. of Chemical Physics 127, ent local anesthetics on the palmar digital nerve block 214107 (2007). in horses, Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 35, 749 [57] D. F. Anderson, B. Ermentrout and P. J. Thomas, (2015); Stochastic representations of ion channel kinetics and ex- J. A. Patacsil, M. S. McAuliffe, L. S. Feyh and L. L. act stochastic simulation of neuronal dynamics, J. Com- Sigmon, Local anesthetic adjuvants providing the longest put. Neurosci. 38, 67 (2015). duration of analgesia for single- injection peripheral nerve [58] D. F. Anderson and T. G. Kurtz, Design and analy- blocks in orthopedic surgery: A literature review, AANA sis of biomolecular circuits, chapter 1. Continuous Time Journal 84, 95 (2016). Markov chain models for chemical reaction networks, [46] E. F. Targ and J. D. Kocsis, Action potential character- (Springer, 2011). istics of demyelinated rat sciatic nerve following applica- tion of 4-aminopyridine, Brain Research 363, 1 (1986). [47] G. R. Strichartz, The inhibition of sodium currents in myelinated nerve by quaternary derivatives of lidocaine, J. Gen. Physiol. 62, 37 (1973). [48] B. Maisel and K. Lindenberg, Channel noise effects on first spike latency of a stochastic Hodgkin-Huxley neuron, Phys. Rev. E 95, 022414 (2017); S. Jamasb, Extension of the neuronal membrane model to account for suppression of the action potential by a constant magnetic field, Biophysics J. 62, 428 (2017); N. Stankevich and E. Mosekilde, Coexistence between silent and bursting states in a biophysical Hodgkin- Huxley-type of model, Chaos 27, 123101 (2017); R. Baravalle, O. A. Rosso and F. Montani, A path inte- gral approach to the Hodgkin-Huxley model, Physica A 486, 986 (2017). [49] G. Indiveri, Synaptic plasticity and spike-based com- putation in VLSI networks of integrate-and-fire neurons, Neural Inf. Process. Lett. Rev. 11, 135 (2007). [50] E. M. Izhikevich, Simple model of spiking neurons, IEEE Trans. Neural. Netw. 14, 1569 (2003). [51] C. Morris and H. Lecar, Voltage oscillations in the bar- nacle giant muscle fiber, Biophys. J. 35, 193 (1981). [52] R. FitzHugh, Impulses and physiological states in the- oretical models of nerve membrane, Biophys J. 1, 445 (1961). [53] A. R. Willms, D. J. Baro, R. M. Harris-Warrick and J. Guckenheimer, An improved parameter estimation method for Hodgkin-Huxley models, J. Comput. Neu- rosci. 6(2), 145 (1999); D. Csercsik et al., Hodgkin-Huxley type modeling and parameter estimation of GnRH neurons, IEEE BioSys- tems 100, 198 (2010). [54] K. Pal, B. Das and G. Gangopadhyay, Nonequilibrium 1

Supplemental 3. Dual Blockers, case: kson > kpon The action po- tential for the case kson > kpon shows very noisy action Material potential trains. The peak height seems to fall gradually. Thus the spikes which have peaks above -10 mV has been 1. Effective ionic current: The effective ionic cur- considered in the paper works. rent is given as, Iint = INa + IK + IL. Effect of Dual Blocking, Case ks > kp Sodium Only Blocker Potassium Only Blocker on on 60 100 100 ks = 0.001, kp = 0.0001 30 a on on 0 -30 0 0 -60 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000 60 b ks = 0.01, kp = 0.001 30 on on -100 -100 0 -30 -60 -200 -200 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000 60 c 30 ks on = 0.1, kp on = 0.01 0 -300 No Drug -300 0.05 -30 Effective Ionic Current During AP 0.5 Effective Ionic Current During AP -60 Action Potential (ms) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 -400 -400 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 d ks on = 0.5, kp on = 0.05 Action Potential(mV) Action Potential(mV) 30 0 -30 -60 FIG. S1: Effective ionic current is plotted here in 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 presence of sodium and potassium only blockers for Time(ms) kon= 0.05 and 0.5 has been plotted with the case when FIG. S3: The trend of action potential termination the 2 no drug is present. Here A= 200.0 µm and Iext= 6.9 2 case, kson > kpon is plotted here with A= 200.0 µm 2 µA/cm . The left panel is for sodium only blockers and 2 and Iext= 6.9 µA/cm . the right panel is for potassium only blockers.

2. Dual Blockers, case: kson = kpon. The trend of 4. Dual Blockers, case: kpon > kson is similar to action potential termination for the case, kson = kpon is that of potassium only blockers. shown below.

Effect of Dual Blocking, Case kpon > kson Effect of Dual Blocking, Case: ks on = kp on 60 60 a kp on = 0.001, ks = 0.0001 a kson = kpon = 0.001 on 30 30 0 0 -30 -30 -60 -60 0 3000 6000 9000 12000 15000 60 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000 15000 16000 17000 b kp = 0.01, ks = 0.001 60 30 on on 30 b ks on = kp on = 0.01 0 0 -30 -30 -60 -60 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 60 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 c kp = 0.1, ks = 0.01 0.01 30 on on 60 c ks = kp = 0.1 0 30 on on -30 0 -60 -30 Action Potential (mV) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

Action Potential (mV) -60 60 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 30 d kp on = 0.5, ks on = 0.05 0 60 -30 d ks on = kp on = 0.5 30 -60 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 -30 -60 Time (ms) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Time(ms) FIG. S4: The action potential for the case kpon > kson 2 FIG. S2: The action potential for the case kson = kpon is plotted here for various affinities with A= 200.0 µm 2 is plotted for affinity, kson = kpon= 0.001 to 0.5 with and Iext= 6.9 µA/cm . 2 2 A= 200.0 µm and Iext= 6.9 µA/cm .