DOCSLIB.ORG

Prescription Medications, Drugs, Herbs & Chemicals Associated With

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prescription Medications, Drugs, Herbs & Chemicals Associated With Prescription Medications, Drugs, Herbs & Chemicals Associated with Tinnitus American Tinnitus Association Prescription Medications, Drugs, Herbs & Chemicals Associated with Tinnitus All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form, or by any means, without the prior written permission of the American Tinnitus Association. ©2013 American Tinnitus Association Prescription Medications, Drugs, Herbs & Chemicals Associated with Tinnitus American Tinnitus Association This document is to be utilized as a conversation tool with your health care provider and is by no means a “complete” listing. Anyone reading this list of ototoxic drugs is strongly advised NOT to discontinue taking any prescribed medication without first contacting the prescribing physician. Just because a drug is listed does not mean that you will automatically get tinnitus, or exacerbate exisiting tinnitus, if you take it. A few will, but many will not. Whether or not you eperience tinnitus after taking one of the listed drugs or herbals, or after being exposed to one of the listed chemicals, depends on many factors ‐ such as your own body chemistry, your sensitivity to drugs, the dose you take, or the length of time you take the drug. It is important to note that there may be drugs NOT listed here that could still cause tinnitus. Although this list is one of the most complete listings of drugs associated with tinnitus, no list of this kind can ever be totally complete – therefore use it as a guide and resource, but do not take it as the final word. The drug brand name is italicized and is followed by the generic drug name in bold. Please note that not every brand name is included as some drugs have numerous brand names. Each drug, herb, and chemical is referenced, with specific details found on page 27. Thank you to Neil Bauman, Ph.D., for his work compiling this list for the American Tinnitus Association. To contact Dr. Bauman directly, email [email protected]. American Tinnitus Association P.O. Box 424049 Washington, D.C., 20042-4049 www.ATA.org All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form, or by any means, without the prior written permission of the American Tinnitus Association. ©2013 American Tinnitus Association Prescription Medications, Drugs, Herbs & Chemicals Associated with Tinnitus American Tinnitus Association (Generic Drug Name) Drug Brand Name Advil Cold & Sinus (Ibuprofen) Afloxan (Proglumetacin) 222 (Acetylsalicylic acid) Agalsidase alfa CPS 282 (Acetylsalicylic acid) Agalsidase beta PDR 282 MEP (Acetylsalicylic acid) Aggrenox (Acetylsalicylic acid) 292 (Acetylsalicylic acid) Agrylin (Anagrelide) 5‐ASA (Mesalamine) Airomir (Albuterol) 692 (Acetylsalicylic acid) Alatrofloxacin (Trovafloxacin) Albert Tiafen (Tiaprofenic acid) A Albuterol CPS, PDR Alclofenac SAN, SHE Abatacept CPS Aldoril (Hydrochlorothiazide) Abelcet (Amphotericin B) Aleve (Naproxen) Abilify (Aripiprazole) Alferon N (Interferon alfa‐n3) Acamprosate CPS, PDR Alka‐Seltzer (Acetylsalicylic acid) AccuNeb (Albuterol) Allegra (Fexofenadine) Accupril (Quinapril) Allegra‐D (Fexofenadine) Accuretic (Quinapril) Aller‐Chlor (Chlorpheniramine) Accutane (Isotretinoin) Allopurinol AHF, PDR Acebutolol CPS Almogran (Almotriptan) Aceclofenac BNF Almotriptan DFC, PDR Acemetacin SAN, SHE, RR Aloxi (Palonosetron) Aceon (Perindopril) Alprazolam CPS, PDR, BE Acetaminophen AC Altace (Ramipril) Acetazolamide CPS, PDR Alumadrine (Phenylpropanolamine) Acetylsalicylic acid NDH, PDR Ambien (Zolpidem) Achromycin (Tetracycline) Ambien CR (Zolpidem) Aciphex (Rabeprazole) AmBisome (Amphotericin B) Acitretin CPS, PDR Amen (MEDroxyprogesterone) Acthar (Corticotropin) Amerge (Naratriptan) Actifed (Pseudoephedrine) Amezinium SHE Actiq (Fentanyl) Amicar (Aminocaproic acid) Actonel (Risedronate) Amikacin CPS, PDR, Am Adalat (Nifedipine) Amikin (Amikacin) Adalimumab A (Trudexa 119) Amiloride CPS, PDR Adapin (Doxepin) Aminocaproic acid CPS, PDR Adcirca (Tadalafil) Aminopyrine NTP Adipex‐P (Phentermine) Aminosidine (Paromomycin) AHF, Am Adriamycin (Doxorubicin) Amiodarone CPS Advagraf (Tacrolimus) Amitriptyline CPS, PDR Advil (Ibuprofen) Amlodipine CPS, PDR All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form, or by any means, without the prior written permission of the American Tinnitus Association. ©2013 American Tinnitus Association Prescription Medications, Drugs, Herbs & Chemicals Associated with Tinnitus American Tinnitus Association Amoebriz (Mebendazole) Apo‐Ketorolac (Ketorolac) Amonafide SAN, SHE Apo‐Lisinopril (Lisinopril) Amoxapine CPS, PDR Apo‐Loratadine (Loratadine) Amphotec (Amphotericin B) Apo‐Mefenamic (Mefenamic acid) Amphotericin B DFC, PDR Apo‐Methazolamide (Methazolamide) Ampyrone (Aminopyrine) Apo‐Midazolam (Midazolam) Amrix (Cyclobenzaprine) Apo‐Misoprostol (Misoprostol) Flexeril (Cyclobenzaprine) Apo‐Moclobemide (Moclobemide) Novo‐Cycloprine (Cyclobenzaprine) Apo‐Nabumetone (Nabumetone) Amtolmetin SHE Apo‐Norflox (Norfloxacin) Amturnide (Amlodipine) Apo‐Nortriptyline (Nortriptyline) Anacin (Acetylsalicylic acid) Apo‐Oxaprozin (Oxaprozin) Anafranil (Clomipramine) Apo‐Phenylbutazone (Phenylbutazone) Anagrelide CPS, PDR Apo‐Prazo (Prazosin) Anaprox (Naproxen) Apo‐Selegiline (Selegiline) Andante (Bunazosin) Apo‐Temazepam (Temazepam) Anexate (Flumazenil) Apo‐Tenoxicam (Tenoxicam) Angeliq (Estradiol) Apo‐Timol (Timolol) Ansaid (Flurbiprofen) Apo‐Trimethoprim (Trimethoprim) Antivert (Meclizine) Apo‐Valproic (Valproic acid) Antizol (Fomepizole) Aprepitant NDH, PDR Anzemet (Dolasetron) Apresazide (Hydrochlorothiazide) APAP (Acetaminophen) AC Apri 28 (Ethinyl estradiol) Aplenzin (Bupropion) Apriso (Mesalamine) Apo‐Acebutolol (Acebutolol) Aralen (Chloroquine) Apo‐Amiloride (Amiloride) Arcoxia (Etoricoxib) Apo‐Beclomethasone (Beclomethasone) Arestin (Minocycline) Apo‐Butorphanol (Butorphanol) Aricept (Donepezil) Apo‐Carvedilol (Carvedilol) Aripiprazole DFC, PDR Apo‐Cetirizine (Cetirizine) Arsenic trioxide DFC, PDR Apo‐Clorazepate (Clorazepate) Artemether/Lumefantrine PDR Apo‐Diltiaz (Diltiazem) Arthrotec (Diclofenac) Apo‐Divalproex (Divalproex) Articaine CPS Apo‐Doxepin (Doxepin) ArtroMED (Amtolmetin) Apo‐Etodolac (Etodolac) ASA (Acetylsalicylic acid) Apo‐Fenofibrate (Fenofibrate) Asacol (Mesalamine) Apo‐Feno‐Micro (Fenofibrate) AsaSANtine (Acetylsalicylic acid) Apo‐Floctafenine (Floctafenine) Ascriptin (Acetylsalicylic acid) Apo‐Fluvoxamine (Fluvoxamine) Asendin (Amoxapine) Apo‐Gabapentin (Gabapentin) Asmavent (Albuterol) Apo‐Hydro (Hydrochlorothiazide) Aspirin (Acetylsalicylic acid) Apo‐Indapamide (Indapamide) Aspirin Backache (Acetylsalicylic acid) Apo‐Keto (Ketoprofen) Astromicin X, Am All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form, or by any means, without the prior written permission of the American Tinnitus Association. ©2013 American Tinnitus Association Prescription Medications, Drugs, Herbs & Chemicals Associated with Tinnitus American Tinnitus Association Atacand (Candesartan) Benoral (Benorilate) Atacand HCT (Candesartan) Benorilate KA7, SAN, MB Atacand Plus (Candesartan) Benorylate (Benorilate) Atenolol CPS Benoxaprofen KA7 Ativan (Lorazepam) Bepridil PDR Atorvastatin CPS, PDR Betaloc (Metoprolol) Atovaquone/Proguanil SHE Betaseron (Interferon beta‐1b) Atretol (Carbamazepine) Betaxolol PDR Atripla (Efavirenz) Betaxon (Levobetaxolol) Atrohist (Pyrilamine) Betimol (Timolol) Atrohist Plus (Phenylpropanolamine) Betoptic (Betaxolol) Atrovent (Ipratropium) Bextra (Valdecoxib) Auranofin KA8 Bexxar (Tositumomab) Avalide (Irbesartan) Biarison (Proquazone) Avapro (Irbesartan) Biaxin (Clarithromycin) Avelox (Moxifloxacin) Bicillin (Penicillin/Penicillin G) Aventyl (Nortriptyline) Biquin (Quinidine) Avlosulfon (Dapsone) Bismuth subsalicylate PDR‐N, SHE Avonex (Interferon beta‐1a) Bisoprolol CPS, PDR Axert (Almotriptan) Blenoxane (Bleomycin) Axocet (Butalbital) Bleomycin KA8 Azactam (Aztreonam) Blocadren (Timolol) Azapropazone BNF Bonamine (Meclizine) Azatadine CPS, PDR Bondormin (Brotizolam) Azithromycin CPS, PDR Bonine (Meclizine) AZT (Zidovudine) Boniva (Ibandronate) Aztreonam DFC, PDR Bosentan CPS Azulfidine (Sulfasalazine) Botox (Botulinum Toxin Type A) Botox Cosmetic (Botulinum Toxin Type A) B Botulinum Toxin Type A CPS, PDR Botulinum Toxin Type B DFC, PDR Backache Caplets (Magnesium salicylate) Brethaire (Terbutaline) Baclofen CPS, PDR Brevicon (Ethinyl estradiol) Bactrim (Trimethoprim) Brexido (Piroxicam) Bayer Aspirin (Acetylsalicylic acid) Bricanyl (Terbutaline) BC Powder (Acetylsalicylic acid) Bromodiphenhydramine Beclomethasone PDR Brotizolam SAN, SHE Beconase (Beclomethasone) Bufferin (Acetylsalicylic acid) Benadryl (Diphenhydramine) Bumetanide BNF Benazepril CPS, PDR Bumex (Bumetanide) Bendectin (Doxylamine) Bunazosin SAN, SHE Bendroflumethiazide Bupivacaine CPS, PDR BenGay (Methyl salicylate) Buprenex (Buprenorphine) All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form, or by any means, without the prior written permission of the American Tinnitus Association. ©2013 American Tinnitus Association Prescription Medications, Drugs, Herbs & Chemicals Associated with Tinnitus American Tinnitus Association Buprenorphine CPS, PDR Cartia XT (Diltiazem) Bupropion CPS, PDR Cartrol (Carteolol) Burinex (Bumetanide) Carvedilol CPS,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Agents – Benefits and New Developments for Cancer Pain
    Carr_subbed.qxp 22/5/09 09:49 Page 18 Supportive Oncology Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Agents – Benefits and New Developments for Cancer Pain a report by Daniel B Carr1 and Marie Belle D Francia2 1. Saltonstall Professor of Pain Research; 2. Special Scientific Staff, Department of Anesthesiology, Tufts Medical Center DOI: 10.17925/EOH.2008.04.2.18 Pain is one of the complications of cancer that patients most fear, and This article surveys the current role of NSAIDs in the management of its multifactorial aetiology makes it one of the most challenging cancer pain and elucidates newly recognised mechanisms that may conditions to treat.1 A systematic review of epidemiological studies on provide a foundation for the next generation of NSAIDs for analgesia cancer pain published between 1982 and 2001 revealed cancer pain for cancer patients. prevalence rates of at least 14%.2 A more recent systematic review identified prevalence rates of cancer pain in as many as one-third of Mechanism of Analgesic Effects patients after curative treatment and two-thirds of patients NSAIDs are a structurally diverse group of compounds known to undergoing treatment regardless of the stage of disease. The wide prevent the formation of prostanoids (prostaglandins and variation in published prevalence rates is due to heterogeneity of the thromboxane) from arachidonic acid through the inhibition of the populations studied, diverse settings, site of primary cancer and stage enzyme cyclo-oxygenase (COX; see Table 1). COX has two isoenzymes: and methodology used to ascertain prevalence.1 COX-1 is found ubiquitously in most tissues and produces prostaglandins and thromboxane, while COX-2 is located in certain A multimodal approach to the treatment of cancer pain that deploys tissues (brain, blood vessels and so on) and its expression increases both pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods may be during inflammation or fever.
    [Show full text]
  • Dental Management of Patients with Inherited Bleeding Disorders: a Multidisciplinary Approach
    Dental management of patients with inherited bleeding disorders: a multidisciplinary approach Hassan Abed, BDS, MSc ¢ Abdalrahman Ainousa, BDS, MSc Bleeding disorders can be inherited or acquired and leeding disorders can result from inherited genetic demonstrate different levels of severity. Dentists may be defects or be acquired due to use of anticoagulant med- called on to treat patients who have bleeding disor- ications or medical conditions such as liver dysfunc- ders such as hemophilia A and von Willebrand disease B 1-3 tion, chronic kidney disease, and autoimmune disease. During (vWD). Dental extraction in any patient with clotting blood vessel injury, hemostasis relies on interactions between factor defects can result in a delayed bleeding episode. the vascular vessel wall and activated platelets as well as clot- 4 Local hemostatic measures provide effective results in ting factors. Any marked defect at one of these stages results a majority of cases but are insufficient in patients with in bleeding disorders. Vascular wall defects, platelet defects, severe hemophilia A and vWD. Therefore, consultation or deficiency of clotting factors can affect the severity level of 5 with the patient’s hematologist is required to ensure bleeding episodes. Thus, patients may have mild, moderate, or preoperative prophylactic coverage. Dental care provid- severe episodes of bleeding. ers have to be aware of any signs of bleeding disorders and refer patients for further medical investigations. This Sources of inherited bleeding disorders article aims to provide dental care providers with the Vascular wall defects knowledge to manage patients with inherited bleeding A patient’s bleeding disorder may be unrecognized, and bleeding disorders, especially hemophilia A and vWD.
    [Show full text]
  • Table S1: Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, and F1 Score of NLP Vs. ICD for Identification of Symptoms for (A) Biome Developm
    Table S1: Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and F1 score of NLP vs. ICD for identification of symptoms for (A) BioMe development cohort; (B) BioMe validation cohort; (C) MIMIC-III; (D) 1 year of notes from patients in BioMe calculated using manual chart review. A) Fatigue Nausea and/or vomiting Anxiety Depression NLP (95% ICD (95% CI) P NLP (95% CI) ICD (95% CI) P NLP (95% CI) ICD (95% CI) P NLP (95% CI) ICD (95% CI) P CI) 0.99 (0.93- 0.59 (0.43- <0.00 0.25 (0.12- <0.00 <0.00 0.54 (0.33- Sensitivity 0.99 (0.9 – 1) 0.98 (0.88 -1) 0.3 (0.15-0.5) 0.85 (0.65-96) 0.02 1) 0.73) 1 0.42) 1 1 0.73) 0.57 (0.29- 0.9 (0.68- Specificity 0.89 (0.4-1) 0.75 (0.19-1) 0.68 0.97 (0.77-1) 0.03 0.98 (0.83-1) 0.22 0.81 (0.53-0.9) 0.96 (0.79-1) 0.06 0.82) 0.99) 0.99 (0.92- 0.86 (0.71- 0.94 (0.79- 0.79 (0.59- PPV 0.96 (0.82-1) 0.3 0.95 (0.66-1) 0.02 0.95 (0.66-1) 0.16 0.93 (0.68-1) 0.12 1) 0.95) 0.99) 0.92) 0.13 (0.03- <0.00 0.49 (0.33- <0.00 0.66 (0.48- NPV 0.89 (0.4-1) 0.007 0.94 (0.63-1) 0.34 (0.2-0.51) 0.97 (0.81-1) 0.86 (0.6-0.95) 0.04 0.35) 1 0.65) 1 0.81) <0.00 <0.00 <0.00 F1 Score 0.99 0.83 0.88 0.57 0.95 0.63 0.82 0.79 0.002 1 1 1 Itching Cramp Pain NLP (95% ICD (95% CI) P NLP (95% CI) ICD (95% CI) P NLP (95% CI) ICD (95% CI) P CI) 0.98 (0.86- 0.24 (0.09- <0.00 0.09 (0.01- <0.00 0.52 (0.37- <0.00 Sensitivity 0.98 (0.85-1) 0.99 (0.93-1) 1) 0.45) 1 0.29) 1 0.66) 1 0.89 (0.72- 0.5 (0.37- Specificity 0.96 (0.8-1) 0.98 (0.86-1) 0.68 0.98 (0.88-1) 0.18 0.5 (0-1) 1 0.98) 0.66) 0.88 (0.69- PPV 0.96 (0.8-1) 0.8 (0.54-1) 0.32 0.8 (0.16-1) 0.22 0.99 (0.93-1) 0.98 (0.87-1) NA* 0.97) 0.98 (0.85- 0.57 (0.41- <0.00 0.58 (0.43- <0.00 NPV 0.98 (0.86-1) 0.5 (0-1) 0.02 (0-0.08) NA* 1) 0.72) 1 0.72) 1 <0.00 <0.00 <0.00 F1 Score 0.97 0.56 0.91 0.28 0.99 0.68 1 1 1 *Denotes 95% confidence intervals and P values that could not be calculated due to insufficient cells in 2x2 tables.
    [Show full text]
  • A Randomised, Non-Inferiority Study of Chloroprocaine 2% and Ropivacaine
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN A randomised, non‑inferiority study of chloroprocaine 2% and ropivacaine 0.75% in ultrasound‑guided axillary block Irene Sulyok1, Claudio Camponovo2, Oliver Zotti1, Werner Haslik3, Markus Köstenberger4, Rudolf Likar4, Chiara Leuratti5, Elisabetta Donati6 & Oliver Kimberger1,7* Chloroprocaine is a short‑acting local anaesthetic with a rapid onset of action and an anaesthesia duration up to 60 min. In this pivotal study success rates, onset and remission of motor and sensory block and safety of chloroprocaine 2% was compared to ropivacaine 0.75% for short‑duration distal upper limb surgery with successful block rates as primary outcome. The study was designed as a prospective, randomised, multi‑centre, active‑controlled, double‑blind, parallel‑group, non‑inferiority study, performed in 4 European hospitals with 211 patients scheduled for short duration distal upper limb surgery under axillary plexus block anaesthesia. Patients received either ultrasound guided axillary block with 20 ml chloroprocaine 2%, or with 20 ml ropivacaine 0.75%. Successful block was defned as block without any supplementation in the frst 45 min calculated from the time of readiness for surgery. 90.8% patients achieved a successful block with chloroprocaine 2% and 92.9% patients with Ropivacaine 0.75%, thus non‑inferiority was demonstrated (10% non inferiority margin; 95% CI − 0.097, 0.039; p = 0.02). Time to onset of block was not signifcantly diferent between the groups. Median time to motor and sensory block regression was signifcantly shorter as was time to home discharge (164 [155–170] min for chloroprocaine versus 380 [209–450] for the ropivacaine group, p < 0.001).
    [Show full text]
  • Acebutolol Hydrochloride Eq 200 Mg Base, Capsule, Oral, 100 0.4612 B Eq 400 Mg Base, Capsule, Oral, 100 0.6713 B
    TRANSMITTAL NO. 37 - FEDERAL UPPER LIMIT DRUG LIST NOVEMBER 20, 2001 The following list of multiple source drugs meets the criteria set forth in 42 CFR 447.332 and Section 1927(e) of the Social Security Act, as amended by OBRA 1993. Payment for multiple source drugs identified and listed below must not exceed, in the aggregate, payment levels determined by applying to each drug entity a reasonable dispensing fee (established by the State and specified in the State plan), plus an amount based on the limit per unit which CMS has determined to be equal to 150 percent applied to the lowest price listed (in package sizes of 100 units, unless otherwise noted) in any of the published compendia of cost information of drugs. The listing is based on data current as of April 2001 from First Data Bank (Blue Book), Medi- Span, and the Red Book. This list does not reference the commonly known brand names. However, the brand names are included in the electronic FUL listing provided to the state agencies. The FUL price list and electronic listing are available at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/Reimbursement/05_FederalUpperLimits.asp. In accordance with current policy, Federal financial participation will not be provided for any drug on the FUL listing for which the FDA has issued a notice of an opportunity for a hearing as a result of the Drug Efficacy Study and Implementation (DESI) program, and which has been found to be a less than effective or is identical, related or similar (IRS) to the DESI drug. The DESI drug is identified by the Food and Drug Administration or reported by the drug manufacturer for purposes of the Medicaid drug rebate program.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Aspirin and Nsaids to Prevent Colorectal Cancer
    Evidence Synthesis Number 45 Use of Aspirin and NSAIDs to Prevent Colorectal Cancer Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 www.ahrq.gov Contract No. 290-02-0021 Prepared by: University of Ottawa Evidence-based Practice Center at The University of Ottawa, Ottawa Canada David Moher, PhD Director Investigators Alaa Rostom, MD, MSc, FRCPC Catherine Dube, MD, MSc, FRCPC Gabriela Lewin, MD Alexander Tsertsvadze, MD Msc Nicholas Barrowman, PhD Catherine Code, MD, FRCPC Margaret Sampson, MILS David Moher, PhD AHRQ Publication No. 07-0596-EF-1 March 2007 This report is based on research conducted by the University of Ottawa Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD (Contract No. 290-02-0021). Funding was provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the author(s), who are responsible for its content, and do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. No statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The information in this report is intended to help clinicians, employers, policymakers, and others make informed decisions about the provision of health care services. This report is intended as a reference and not as a substitute for clinical judgment. This document is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission except those copyrighted materials noted for which further reproduction is prohibited without the specific permission of copyright holders.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Medicinal Drugs and Driving: Co-Ordination and Synthesis Report
    Project No. TREN-05-FP6TR-S07.61320-518404-DRUID DRUID Driving under the Influence of Drugs, Alcohol and Medicines Integrated Project 1.6. Sustainable Development, Global Change and Ecosystem 1.6.2: Sustainable Surface Transport 6th Framework Programme Deliverable 4.4.1 Classification of medicinal drugs and driving: Co-ordination and synthesis report. Due date of deliverable: 21.07.2011 Actual submission date: 21.07.2011 Revision date: 21.07.2011 Start date of project: 15.10.2006 Duration: 48 months Organisation name of lead contractor for this deliverable: UVA Revision 0.0 Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Sixth Framework Programme (2002-2006) Dissemination Level PU Public PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission x Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) DRUID 6th Framework Programme Deliverable D.4.4.1 Classification of medicinal drugs and driving: Co-ordination and synthesis report. Page 1 of 243 Classification of medicinal drugs and driving: Co-ordination and synthesis report. Authors Trinidad Gómez-Talegón, Inmaculada Fierro, M. Carmen Del Río, F. Javier Álvarez (UVa, University of Valladolid, Spain) Partners - Silvia Ravera, Susana Monteiro, Han de Gier (RUGPha, University of Groningen, the Netherlands) - Gertrude Van der Linden, Sara-Ann Legrand, Kristof Pil, Alain Verstraete (UGent, Ghent University, Belgium) - Michel Mallaret, Charles Mercier-Guyon, Isabelle Mercier-Guyon (UGren, University of Grenoble, Centre Regional de Pharmacovigilance, France) - Katerina Touliou (CERT-HIT, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Greece) - Michael Hei βing (BASt, Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen, Germany).
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy of 2% Lidocaine and 4% Articaine in Mandibular Molars with Different Pulp Diagnoses in the Mandibular Technique1
    Efficacy of 2% lidocaine and 4% articaine in mandibular molars with different pulp diagnoses in the mandibular technique1 Eficacia de la lidocaína al 2% y la articaína al 4% en molares mandibulares con diferentes diagnósticos pulpares en la técnica mandibular1 Adel Martínez Martínez2, Evelyn Freyle Granados3, Natalia Senior Carmona3 1 Paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Endodontist 2 Assistant Professor, GITOUC Group, School of Dentistry, Universidad de Cartagena 3 DDS, Specialist in Endodontics, Postgraduate program in Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidad de Cartagena ABSTRACT Introduction: the inferior alveolar dental nerve block is the method most commonly used by endodontists to achieve local anesthesia during treatments. This study compared the efficacy of two anesthetic solutions: 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine and 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in patients with different ARTICLES ORIGINAL pulp diagnoses requiring endodontic treatment. Method: an interventional, randomized clinical trial. The sample included 36 patients who were treated at the postgraduate endodontics service at the Universidad de Cartagena in the year 2016. Descriptive statistics and the Chi2 test were used for data analysis, using a limit of 0.05. Results: articaine showed a greater anesthetic effect in vestibular mucosa (88.9%) and tip of tongue (55.6%), compared with lidocaine. The rates of anesthetic success in the lidocaine and articaine groups were 5.6% and 22.2% respectively, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.633). In teeth with normal pulp, the efficacy was 27.3%, and this value considerably decreased in teeth with asymptomatic and symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, with percentages of 5.8% and 12.5% respectively, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.276).
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in Laboratory Animals to Assess the Safety of Anti-Inflammatory Agents in Acute Porphyria
    Ann Rheum Dis: first published as 10.1136/ard.46.7.540 on 1 July 1987. Downloaded from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1987; 46, 540-542 Studies in laboratory animals to assess the safety of anti-inflammatory agents in acute porphyria KENNETH E L McCOLL, GEORGE G THOMPSON, AND MICHAEL R MOORE From the University Department of Medicine, Western Infirmary, Glasgow SUMMARY The safety of various anti-inflammatory drugs in acute porphyria was assessed by examining their effect on rat hepatic haem synthesis. Azapropazone, chloroquine, and gold increased 6-aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) synthase activity, indicating that they are liable to precipitate porphyric crises. Aspirin, ibuprofen, indomethacin, ketoprofen, flurbiprofen, phenylbutazone, naproxen, prednisolone, and penicillamine did not increase ALA synthase activity and should be safe in porphyria. Though these animal studies can be used as a guide to prescribing in patients with acute porphyria, some caution is still required as species may vary in their response to inducing agents. Key words: chloroquine, azapropazone, gold, b-aminolaevulinic acid synthase. copyright. The acute hepatic porphyrias which comprise acute controlling enzyme of haem biosynthesis 6- intermittent porphyria, hereditary coproporphyria, aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) synthase in rat hepatic and variegate porphyria are examples of pharma- tissue. To confirm the reliability of the animal cogenetic disease. They are the result of deficien- model, phenobarbitone was also tested. For each cies of individual enzymes in the pathway of haem drug examined six male Sprague-Dawley rats re- biosynthesis and are inherited in an autosomal ceived the test drug and six control rats received the dominant fashion.2 Subjects with the genetic trait appropriate placebo solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Acemetacin.Pdf
    Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology 2010, 32(2): ???-??? THOMSON REUTERS Copyright © 2010 Prous Science, S.A.U. or its licensors. All rights reserved. CCC: 0379-0355/2010 DOI: 10.1358/mf.2010.32.2.1423883 ORIGINAL ARTICLE ACEMETACIN ANTINOCICEPTIVE MECHANISM IS NOT RELATED TO NO OR K+ CHANNEL PATHWAYS. M. Gil-Flores1, M.I. Ortiz2, G. Castañeda-Hernández1 and A.E. Chávez-Piña1 1Departamento de Farmacología, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México, D.F., México. 2Área Académica de Medicina del Instituto de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Pachuca, Hidalgo, México SUMMARY Indomethacin is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) used for the treatment of acute gout and inflammation. However, its use is limited due to side effects. Acemetacin is a prodrug of indomethacin that exhibits better gastric tolerability in preclinical and clinical tri- als. The aim of this study was to examine if the systemic administration of acemetacin involved the sequential participation of nitric oxide (NO) or K+ channel pathways to confer its antinociceptive effect, as compared to indomethacin. The antinociceptive effect of both drugs was studied with the formalin test. Equimolar doses of acemetacin or indomethacin were administered orally. The intraplantar administra- tion of either L-NAME, glibenclamide, apamin or charybdotoxin plus indomethacin or acemetacin was studied using the formalin test and the anti-inflammatory and antihyperalgesic effects were measured. The antinociceptive effect of acemetacin or indomethacin was not sig- nificantly different when pretreatment with L-NAME, glibenclamide, apamin or charybdotoxin was done. The antihyperalgesic and anti- inflammatory effects were also similar for both indomethacin and acemetacin.
    [Show full text]
  • Binding of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs to DPPC: Structure and Thermodynamic Aspects
    4132 Langmuir 2008, 24, 4132-4139 Binding of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs to DPPC: Structure and Thermodynamic Aspects Marlene Lu´cio,*,†,⊥ Frank Bringezu,‡,|,⊥ Salette Reis,† Jose´ L. F. C. Lima,† and Gerald Brezesinski§,⊥ REQUIMTE, Faculdade de Farma´cia, UniVersidade do Porto, Rua Anı´bal Cunha, 4099-030 Porto, Portugal, Institute of Medical Physics and Biophysics, UniVersity of Leipzig, Ha¨rtelstrasse 16, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany, and Max-Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Research Campus Golm, Am Mu¨hlenberg 1, D-14476 Potsdam, Germany ReceiVed NoVember 16, 2007. In Final Form: January 8, 2008 The effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on the phase transition and phase properties of 1,2-dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) has been investigated in both 2D (monolayers at the air/water interface) and 3D (multilayers in lipid/water dispersions) model systems. The 2D membrane models have been characterized by means of pressure-area isotherms and grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXD) measurements. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and simultaneous small- and wide-angle X-ray diffraction have been applied to lipid aqueous dispersions. All NSAIDs studied altered the main transition temperature of the gel to liquid-crystalline phase transition, with the arylacetic acid derivatives (acemetacin and indomethacin) showing the largest effects. A comparison of the results reveals distinct structural features of the membrane models after interaction with the NSAID. All drugs induced perturbations in the lipid liquid-crystalline phase, suggesting a major change in the hydration behavior of DPPC. Again, the largest effects on the structural parameters are found for the arylacetic acid derivatives. The results obtained in the different model systems give indications of the role of the membrane/NSAID interactions that might also be important for NSAID gastric injury.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanism of Action of Nicotine in Isolated Urinary Bladder of Guinea-Pig
    Br. J. Pharmacol. (1988), 95, 465-472 Mechanism of action of nicotine in isolated urinary bladder of guinea-pig Tetsuhiro Hisayama, Michiko Shinkai, lIssei Takayanagi & Toshie Toyoda Department of Chemical Pharmacology, Toho University School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-2-1, Miyama, Funabashi, Chiba 274, Japan 1 Nicotine produced a transient contraction of isolated strips of guinea-pig urinary bladder. The response to nicotine was antagonized by the nicotinic receptor antagonist, hexamethonium but was insensitive to tetrodotoxin. 2 The nicotine-induced contraction was potentiated by the cholinesterase inhibitor, physostig- mine, and was reduced to 50% and 70% by the muscarinic cholinoceptor antagonist, atropine and the sympathetic neurone blocking drug, guanethidine, respectively. Chemical denervation with 6- hydroxydopamine abolished the inhibitory effect of guanethidine. Simultaneous treatment with atropine and guanethidine did not abolish the response to nicotine, but the degree of inhibition was comparable to that obtained with atropine alone. 3 The nicotine-induced contraction was insensitive to bunazosin and yohimbine (al- and Cc2-adrenoceptor antagonists, respectively), and exogenously applied noradrenaline did not cause a contraction even in the presence of blockade of noradrenaline uptake mechanisms with desipramine and normetanephrine and of fi-adrenoceptors with propranolol, suggesting a non-adrenergic nature of the sympathomimetic effect of nicotine in this tissue. 4 The nicotine-induced contraction in the presence of atropine was abolished after desensitization of P2-purinoceptors with a, ,B-methylene adenosine 5'-triphosphate, a slowly degradable ATP ana- logue selective for P2-purinoceptors. By this desensitization, the response to ATP, but not to hista- mine, was also abolished. 5 A cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor flurbiprofen partially inhibited the nicotine-induced contraction.
    [Show full text]