American Indian History Timeline

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

American Indian History Timeline AMERICAN INDIAN HISTORY TIMELINE 1886 1980 With United States v. Kagama the Supreme U.S. v. Sioux Nation. The Court rules that the Court upholds Congress' authority to pass Sioux must be awarded compensation with LAW the Major Crimes Act, holding that the U.S. interest for the U.S. confiscation of the Black Federal Government has the "plenary power" Hills. The Sioux Nation refuses the money in the or supreme, absolute control over Indians. hopes of regaining the land itself. LEGISLATION 1887 1981 The General Allotment Act, In Montana v. the U.S. the Court ruled introduced by Senator Henry Dawes, that a tribe's regulation of non-Indian POLICY is passed by Congress. The single hunting on non-Indian land within a 1823 1831 most destructive piece of legislation reservation was inconsistent with a tribe's Johnson v. Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 1883 aimed at tribal land. The act and its status as a dependent domestic nation. McIntosh, the the second case in the "Marshall subsequent amendments created the Ex Parte Crow Dog. EVENTS first of the three Trilogy." The court found that general framework for removing 1978 The Supreme Court Supreme Court the Cherokee Nation was not reservation land from communal In U.S. v. Wheeler ruled that the murder 1982 2005 cases referred to a "foreign state" but a "domestic tribal ownership and allotting parcels 1974 the Supreme Court of one Indian by In Seminole Tribe v. Butterworth, In City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York, the as the "Marshall dependent nation," to whom to individual members, which U.S. v. Washington grants the existence another within Indian the Court ruled that tribes have a Supreme Court held that the repurchase of traditional tribal lands Trilogy." The the U.S. has a guardian-ward could eventually be sold, given, or 1954 (the Boldt Decision) of tribal sovereignty Country was not right to create gambling enterprises did not restore tribal sovereignty to that land, meaning that the land court ruled that relationship. Dictum in the otherwise transferred to non-Indians Brown v. Board of Education is holds that treaties but declares this a criminal offense on their land. could not be exempted from local property taxes. Indian tribes case also affirmed the status of after expiration or termination of decided by the Supreme Court with tribes in the sovereignty subject 1989 punishable by the could not convey tribes as states and the validity of a 25-year-period. Reservation land prohibiting states from segregating Northwest that to Congressional In Hodel v. Irving, the Supreme United States. Indian land to private treaties with tribes. that exceeded the amount needed schools based on race – based on preserve the right whim. 1987 Court invalidated original Section tribes in their territory parties without by an individual allotments on a 1903 the principles of equality. to fish "at all usual In California v. 207 of the Indian Land Consolidation 2009 were free of regulation the consent reservation was considered surplus, The "plenary power" of Congress over and accustomed In Oliphant v. Cabazon Band of Act of 1983 on the grounds that it In Carcieri v. Salazar, the Supreme Court’s decision eliminated the 1781 by other sovereign of the federal 1832 taken out of tribal ownership and Indians is further strengthened in grounds and stations" Squamish, the Court Mission Indians, effected a taking of private property ability of the federal government to take land into trust for Indian The Articles of Confederation declare the governments absent was open to general homesteading by Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock. The Court struck down tribal the Supreme tribes that were not recognized as “under federal jurisdiction” in 1934, government. The Worcester v. Georgia. The 1955 guarantees tribes an without just compensation. federal government shall have authority explicit direction non-natives. This formed the basis ruled that treaties may be unilaterally jurisdiction over Court rules the when the Indian Reorganization Act was passed, unless there is some Court reasoned third part of the "Marshall In Tee-Hit-Ton v. U.S. the Supreme opportunity to take over Indian affairs, "provided that the from Congress. for modern land trust status, land breached or modified by Congress. crimes committed grant to civil other statutory authority for the trust acquisition. that European Trilogy." The Supreme Court held that aboriginal title is "not half of all harvestable legislative right of any within its own fractionation, checkerboard land The Court also restricted its review of by non-Indians on jurisdiction under conquest and the Court held that state laws a property right but amounts to a right fish. This was later limits (sic) be not infringed or violated." ownership and on-going land loss. political acts of Congress affecting the reservations. P.L. 280 does not establishment of did not extend into Indian of occupancy which the sovereign extended to shellfish 1997 the United States federal trust responsibility to Indians. and game. include regulatory 2010 Country because they were grants and... may be terminated and In Babbitt v. Youpee Sr,. the Supreme diminished the authority; therefore, After 14 years of litigation, President Barack Obama signs legislation approving incompatible with treaties, such lands fully disposed of by the Court affirmed that Section 207 1788 sovereignty of 1891 1978 the state laws the Cobell Settlement, the terms of which require the federal government the Constitution and the laws sovereign itself without any legally 1975 (as amended) of the Indian Land The U.S. Constitution, Article 1, tribes and limited Congress permits The Indian American Indian relating to gaming to create a $1.5 billion fund to pay individual Indian trust beneficiaries, a $1.9 "giving effect to the treaties." 1906 enforceable obligation to compensate Consolidation Act of 1983 violated Section 8, Clause 3, asserts that their power the leasing of The Burke Act is 1953 Self- Religious Act is cannot be enforced billion Trust Land Consolidation fund, and an Indian Education Scholarship the Indians." the Just Compensation Clause of the Congress shall have the power, to dispose of individual Indian passed which allows the Public Law 280 is passed Determination passed promising against Indians. fund of up to $60 million to improve access to higher education for Indians. Fifth Amendment. "to regulate Commerce with their land. allotments by Secretary of the Interior which transferred civil and Education to "protect and The Settlement terms also include a government commitment to reform the foreign nations, and among 1934 and criminal jurisdiction 1830 1862 1885 non-natives 1898 to administer Indian trust 1924 1956 1971 Act is passed preserve for Indian trust management and accounting system. the several States, and with the wherever the property. This also allowed The Indian over Indian lands to state which American Indians 1983 The Indian Removal Act authorizes the President to The Homestead Act of 1862 is passed, In response The Curtis The Indian The Relocation The Alaska Native Claims Indian Tribes." State power on Secretary of the Secretary to take this Reorganization governments in six states. recognized the their inherent right The first 1988 1990 2004 negotiate with tribes to give up land in the East in turning over lands within the American to Crow Dog Act expanded Citizenship Act is passed Settlement Act is passed Indian issues is thus subordinated the Interior property out of trust Act is passed. right of Indian and freedom to Indian Land The Indian The Native American American exchange for land in the West. This resulted in the public domain to private U.S. citizens. case, Congress the powers Act is passed encouraging which creates regional and 2012 to federal power. See also finds that the for allottees that applied This Act 1946 tribes to self- believe, express and Consolidation Gaming Graves Protection Indian Probate forced removal of most Eastern tribes to the West of passes the of the federal declaring all From 1946 to 1978 the Indian Claims Indians to move village corporations to own In Patchak v. Salazar, the Supreme Court held that Congress Article VI, Clause 2, where the allottee, "by for fee patents and for repealed the government exercise" traditional Act is passed. Regulatory and Repatriation Act Reform Act the Mississippi River by the U.S. Army. Only small Congress passes the Pacific Railway Major Crimes government non-citizen Commission, using an adversarial court to urban areas. and manage 44 million waived the federal government’s immunity from suit to constitution states that treaties reason of age or those landowners deemed Dawes Act and "as domestic religions, "including This law, and Act is passed. (NAGPRA) is passed. (AIPRA) remnants remained in their traditional lands in the East. Act authorizing the construction of a Act, extending over Indian Indians process, hears land claims brought by acres of land. challenge Secretarial trust land acquisitions in the Administrative are the "supreme law of the land." disability" cannot competent by the local enabled tribes dependent but not limited to its 1984, 2000 passed. Note in transcontinental railroad. federal criminal Affairs. born within tribes for wrongful dispossession of Procedure Act. The decision compounds the problems created "personally and Indian superintendent. to voluntarily nations, Indian access to sites, use and 2004 2000 Federal Register jurisdiction over American their lands. Tribes pressed 484 claims by Carcieri by broadening the class of individuals who could with benefit to Some 27 million acres of organize and tribes exercise and possession of amendments, Amendments to and notice to major crimes in Territorial and won 58% of them. The commission's challenge trust acquisitions, and provides that the fee-to-trust himself occupy allotted land were lost to adopt federally 1968 inherent sacred objects, and promotes the Indian Land landowners in Indian Country.
Recommended publications
  • Rahm Uaf 0006E 10262.Pdf
    Deconstructing the western worldview: toward the repatriation and indigenization of wellness Item Type Thesis Authors Rahm, Jacqueline Marie Download date 23/09/2021 13:22:54 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/4821 DECONSTRUCTING THE WESTERN WORLDVIEW: TOWARD THE REPATRIATION AND INDIGENIZATION OF WELLNESS A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the University of Alaska Fairbanks in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Jacqueline Marie Rahm, B.A., M.A. Fairbanks, Alaska December 2014 Abstract As Indigenous peoples and scholars advance Native histories, cultures, and languages, there is a critical need to support these efforts by deconstructing the western worldview in a concerted effort to learn from indigenous knowledge and ways of knowing for humanity’s future wellbeing. Toward that imperative, this research brings together and examines pieces of the western story as they intersect with Indigenous peoples of the lands that now comprise the United States of America. Through indigenous frameworks and methodologies, it explores a forgotten epistemology of the pre-Socratic and Pythagorean Archaic and Classical Greek eras that is far more similar to indigenous worldviews than it is to the western paradigm today. It traces how the West left behind this timeless wisdom for the “new learning” and the European colonial settlers arrived in the old “New World” with a fragmented, materialistic, and dualistic worldview that was the antithesis to those of Indigenous peoples. An imbalanced and privileged worldview not only justified an unacknowledged genocide in world history, it is characteristic of a psycho-spiritual disease that plays out across our global society.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Timeline
    Geological Timeline In this pack you will find information and activities to help your class grasp the concept of geological time, just how old our planet is, and just how young we, as a species, are. Planet Earth is 4,600 million years old. We all know this is very old indeed, but big numbers like this are always difficult to get your head around. The activities in this pack will help your class to make visual representations of the age of the Earth to help them get to grips with the timescales involved. Important EvEnts In thE Earth’s hIstory 4600 mya (million years ago) – Planet Earth formed. Dust left over from the birth of the sun clumped together to form planet Earth. The other planets in our solar system were also formed in this way at about the same time. 4500 mya – Earth’s core and crust formed. Dense metals sank to the centre of the Earth and formed the core, while the outside layer cooled and solidified to form the Earth’s crust. 4400 mya – The Earth’s first oceans formed. Water vapour was released into the Earth’s atmosphere by volcanism. It then cooled, fell back down as rain, and formed the Earth’s first oceans. Some water may also have been brought to Earth by comets and asteroids. 3850 mya – The first life appeared on Earth. It was very simple single-celled organisms. Exactly how life first arose is a mystery. 1500 mya – Oxygen began to accumulate in the Earth’s atmosphere. Oxygen is made by cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) as a product of photosynthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on Indian Township Passamaquoddy Tribal Lands In
    A REPORT ON INDIAN TOWNSHIP PASSAMAQUODDY TRIBAL LANDS IN THE VICINITY OF PRINCETON, MAINE Anthony J. Kaliss 1971 Introduction to 1971 Printing Over two years have passed since I completed the research work for this report and during those years first one thing and ttan another prevented its final completion and printing. The main credit for the final preparation and printing goes to the Division of Indian Services of the Catholic Diocese of Portland and the American Civil Liberities Union of Maine. The Dioscese provided general assistance from its office staff headed by Louis Doyle and particular thanks is due to Erline Paul of Indian Island who did a really excellent job of typing more than 50 stencils of title abstracts, by their nature a real nuisance to type. The American Civil Liberities Union contrib­ uted greatly by undertaking to print the report Xtfhich will come to some 130 pages. Finally another excellent typist must be thanked and that is Edward Hinckley former Commissioner of Indian Affairs who also did up some 50 stencils It is my feeling that this report is more timely than ever. The Indian land problems have still not been resolved, but more and more concern is being expressed by Indians and non-Indians that something be done. Hopefully the appearance of this report at this time will help lead to some definite action whether in or out of the courts. Further research on Indian lands and trust funds remains to be done. The material, I believe, is available and it is my hope that this report will stimulate someone to undertake the necessary work.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous People of Western New York
    FACT SHEET / FEBRUARY 2018 Indigenous People of Western New York Kristin Szczepaniec Territorial Acknowledgement In keeping with regional protocol, I would like to start by acknowledging the traditional territory of the Haudenosaunee and by honoring the sovereignty of the Six Nations–the Mohawk, Cayuga, Onondaga, Oneida, Seneca and Tuscarora–and their land where we are situated and where the majority of this work took place. In this acknowledgement, we hope to demonstrate respect for the treaties that were made on these territories and remorse for the harms and mistakes of the far and recent past; and we pledge to work toward partnership with a spirit of reconciliation and collaboration. Introduction This fact sheet summarizes some of the available history of Indigenous people of North America date their history on the land as “since Indigenous people in what is time immemorial”; some archeologists say that a 12,000 year-old history on now known as Western New this continent is a close estimate.1 Today, the U.S. federal government York and provides information recognizes over 567 American Indian and Alaskan Native tribes and villages on the contemporary state of with 6.7 million people who identify as American Indian or Alaskan, alone Haudenosaunee communities. or combined.2 Intended to shed light on an often overlooked history, it The land that is now known as New York State has a rich history of First includes demographic, Nations people, many of whom continue to influence and play key roles in economic, and health data on shaping the region. This fact sheet offers information about Native people in Indigenous people in Western Western New York from the far and recent past through 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Simcoe Mountains Volcanic Field, Main Central Segment, Yakama Nation, Washington by Wes Hildreth and Judy Fierstein
    Prepared in Cooperation with the Water Resources Program of the Yakama Nation Geologic Map of the Simcoe Mountains Volcanic Field, Main Central Segment, Yakama Nation, Washington By Wes Hildreth and Judy Fierstein Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3315 Photograph showing Mount Adams andesitic stratovolcano and Signal Peak mafic shield volcano viewed westward from near Mill Creek Guard Station. Low-relief rocky meadows and modest forested ridges marked by scattered cinder cones and shields are common landforms in Simcoe Mountains volcanic field. Mount Adams (elevation: 12,276 ft; 3,742 m) is centered 50 km west and 2.8 km higher than foreground meadow (elevation: 2,950 ft.; 900 m); its eruptions began ~520 ka, its upper cone was built in late Pleistocene, and several eruptions have taken place in the Holocene. Signal Peak (elevation: 5,100 ft; 1,555 m), 20 km west of camera, is one of largest and highest eruptive centers in Simcoe Mountains volcanic field; short-lived shield, built around 3.7 Ma, is seven times older than Mount Adams. 2015 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Introductory Overview for Non-Geologists ...............................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................2 Physiography, Environment, Boundary Surveys, and Access ......................................................6 Previous Geologic
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Ethnozoology Herman A
    IK: Other Ways of Knowing A publication of The Interinstitutional Center for Indigenous Knowledge at The Pennsylvania State University Libraries Editors: Audrey Maretzki Amy Paster Helen Sheehy Managing Editor: Mark Mattson Associate Editor: Abigail Houston Assistant Editors: Teodora Hasegan Rachel Nill Section Editor: Nonny Schlotzhauer A publication of Penn State Library’s Open Publishing Cover photo taken by Nick Vanoster ISSN: 2377-3413 doi:10.18113/P8ik360314 IK: Other Ways of Knowing Table of Contents CONTENTS FRONT MATTER From the Editors………………………………………………………………………………………...i-ii PEER REVIEWED Integrating Traditional Ecological Knowledge with Western Science for Optimal Natural Resource Management Serra Jeanette Hoagland……………………………………………………………………………….1-15 Strokes Unfolding Unexplored World: Drawing as an Instrument to Know the World of Aadivasi Children in India Rajashri Ashok Tikhe………………………………………………………………………………...16-29 Dancing Together: The Lakota Sun Dance and Ethical Intercultural Exchange Ronan Hallowell……………………………………………………………………………………...30-52 BOARD REVIEWED Field Report: Collecting Data on the Influence of Culture and Indigenous Knowledge on Breast Cancer Among Women in Nigeria Bilikisu Elewonibi and Rhonda BeLue………………………………………………………………53-59 Prioritizing Women’s Knowledge in Climate Change: Preparing for My Dissertation Research in Indonesia Sarah Eissler………………………………………………………………………………………….60-66 The Library for Food Sovereignty: A Field Report Freya Yost…………………………………………………………………………………………….67-73 REVIEWS AND RESOURCES A Review of
    [Show full text]
  • Cherokees in Arkansas
    CHEROKEES IN ARKANSAS A historical synopsis prepared for the Arkansas State Racing Commission. John Jolly - first elected Chief of the Western OPERATED BY: Cherokee in Arkansas in 1824. Image courtesy of the Smithsonian American Art Museum LegendsArkansas.com For additional information on CNB’s cultural tourism program, go to VisitCherokeeNation.com THE CROSSING OF PATHS TIMELINE OF CHEROKEES IN ARKANSAS Late 1780s: Some Cherokees began to spend winters hunting near the St. Francis, White, and Arkansas Rivers, an area then known as “Spanish Louisiana.” According to Spanish colonial records, Cherokees traded furs with the Spanish at the Arkansas Post. Late 1790s: A small group of Cherokees relocated to the New Madrid settlement. Early 1800s: Cherokees continued to immigrate to the Arkansas and White River valleys. 1805: John B. Treat opened a trading post at Spadra Bluff to serve the incoming Cherokees. 1808: The Osage ceded some of their hunting lands between the Arkansas and White Rivers in the Treaty of Fort Clark. This increased tension between the Osage and Cherokee. 1810: Tahlonteeskee and approximately 1,200 Cherokees arrived to this area. 1811-1812: The New Madrid earthquake destroyed villages along the St. Francis River. Cherokees living there were forced to move further west to join those living between AS HISTORICAL AND MODERN NEIGHBORS, CHEROKEE the Arkansas and White Rivers. Tahlonteeskee settled along Illinois Bayou, near NATION AND ARKANSAS SHARE A DEEP HISTORY AND present-day Russellville. The Arkansas Cherokee petitioned the U.S. government CONNECTION WITH ONE ANOTHER. for an Indian agent. 1813: William Lewis Lovely was appointed as agent and he set up his post on CHEROKEE NATION BUSINESSES RESPECTS AND WILL Illinois Bayou.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civil War and Reconstruction in Indian Territory
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln University of Nebraska Press -- Sample Books and University of Nebraska Press Chapters 2015 The iC vil War and Reconstruction in Indian Territory Bradley R. Clampitt Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/unpresssamples Clampitt, Bradley R., "The ivC il War and Reconstruction in Indian Territory" (2015). University of Nebraska Press -- Sample Books and Chapters. 311. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/unpresssamples/311 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Nebraska Press at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Nebraska Press -- Sample Books and Chapters by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. The Civil War and Reconstruction in Indian Territory Buy the Book Buy the Book The Civil War and Reconstruction in Indian Territory Edited and with an introduction by Bradley R. Clampitt University of Nebraska Press Lincoln and London Buy the Book © 2015 by the Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska A portion of the introduction originally appeared as “ ‘For Our Own Safety and Welfare’: What the Civil War Meant in Indian Territory,” by Bradley R. Clampitt, in Main Street Oklahoma: Stories of Twentieth- Century America edited by Linda W. Reese and Patricia Loughlin (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2013), © 2013 by the University of Oklahoma Press. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data The Civil War and Reconstruction in Indian Territory / Edited and with an introduction by Bradley R.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Affiliation Statement for Buffalo National River
    CULTURAL AFFILIATION STATEMENT BUFFALO NATIONAL RIVER, ARKANSAS Final Report Prepared by María Nieves Zedeño Nicholas Laluk Prepared for National Park Service Midwest Region Under Contract Agreement CA 1248-00-02 Task Agreement J6068050087 UAZ-176 Bureau of Applied Research In Anthropology The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85711 June 1, 2008 Table of Contents and Figures Summary of Findings...........................................................................................................2 Chapter One: Study Overview.............................................................................................5 Chapter Two: Cultural History of Buffalo National River ................................................15 Chapter Three: Protohistoric Ethnic Groups......................................................................41 Chapter Four: The Aboriginal Group ................................................................................64 Chapter Five: Emigrant Tribes...........................................................................................93 References Cited ..............................................................................................................109 Selected Annotations .......................................................................................................137 Figure 1. Buffalo National River, Arkansas ........................................................................6 Figure 2. Sixteenth Century Polities and Ethnic Groups (after Sabo 2001) ......................47
    [Show full text]
  • BROKEN PROMISES: Continuing Federal Funding Shortfall for Native Americans
    U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS BROKEN PROMISES: Continuing Federal Funding Shortfall for Native Americans BRIEFING REPORT U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS Washington, DC 20425 Official Business DECEMBER 2018 Penalty for Private Use $300 Visit us on the Web: www.usccr.gov U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is an independent, Catherine E. Lhamon, Chairperson bipartisan agency established by Congress in 1957. It is Patricia Timmons-Goodson, Vice Chairperson directed to: Debo P. Adegbile Gail L. Heriot • Investigate complaints alleging that citizens are Peter N. Kirsanow being deprived of their right to vote by reason of their David Kladney race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national Karen Narasaki origin, or by reason of fraudulent practices. Michael Yaki • Study and collect information relating to discrimination or a denial of equal protection of the laws under the Constitution Mauro Morales, Staff Director because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice. • Appraise federal laws and policies with respect to U.S. Commission on Civil Rights discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or Washington, DC 20425 national origin, or in the administration of justice. (202) 376-8128 voice • Serve as a national clearinghouse for information TTY Relay: 711 in respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, www.usccr.gov religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin. • Submit reports, findings, and recommendations to the President and Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chiricahua Apache from 1886-1914, 35 Am
    American Indian Law Review Volume 35 | Number 1 1-1-2010 Values in Transition: The hirC icahua Apache from 1886-1914 John W. Ragsdale Jr. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/ailr Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons, Indigenous Studies Commons, Other History Commons, Other Languages, Societies, and Cultures Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation John W. Ragsdale Jr., Values in Transition: The Chiricahua Apache from 1886-1914, 35 Am. Indian L. Rev. (2010), https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/ailr/vol35/iss1/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VALUES IN TRANSITION: THE CHIRICAHUA APACHE FROM 1886-1914 John W Ragsdale, Jr.* Abstract Law confirms but seldom determines the course of a society. Values and beliefs, instead, are the true polestars, incrementally implemented by the laws, customs, and policies. The Chiricahua Apache, a tribal society of hunters, gatherers, and raiders in the mountains and deserts of the Southwest, were squeezed between the growing populations and economies of the United States and Mexico. Raiding brought response, reprisal, and ultimately confinement at the loathsome San Carlos Reservation. Though most Chiricahua submitted to the beginnings of assimilation, a number of the hardiest and least malleable did not. Periodic breakouts, wild raids through New Mexico and Arizona, and a labyrinthian, nearly impenetrable sanctuary in the Sierra Madre led the United States to an extraordinary and unprincipled overreaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Confronting History on Campus
    CHRONICLEFocusFocus THE CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION Confronting History on Campus As a Chronicle of Higher Education individual subscriber, you receive premium, unrestricted access to the entire Chronicle Focus collection. Curated by our newsroom, these booklets compile the most popular and relevant higher-education news to provide you with in-depth looks at topics affecting campuses today. The Chronicle Focus collection explores student alcohol abuse, racial tension on campuses, and other emerging trends that have a significant impact on higher education. ©2016 by The Chronicle of Higher Education Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, forwarded (even for internal use), hosted online, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. For bulk orders or special requests, contact The Chronicle at [email protected] ©2016 THE CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS OODROW WILSON at Princeton, John Calhoun at Yale, Jefferson Davis at the University of Texas at Austin: Students, campus officials, and historians are all asking the question, What’sW in a name? And what is a university’s responsibil- ity when the name on a statue, building, or program on campus is a painful reminder of harm to a specific racial group? Universities have been grappling anew with those questions, and trying different approaches to resolve them. Colleges Struggle Over Context for Confederate Symbols 4 The University of Mississippi adds a plaque to a soldier’s statue to explain its place there.
    [Show full text]