DOCSLIB.ORG

Geologic Map of the Simcoe Mountains Volcanic Field, Main Central Segment, Yakama Nation, Washington by Wes Hildreth and Judy Fierstein

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geologic Map of the Simcoe Mountains Volcanic Field, Main Central Segment, Yakama Nation, Washington by Wes Hildreth and Judy Fierstein Prepared in Cooperation with the Water Resources Program of the Yakama Nation Geologic Map of the Simcoe Mountains Volcanic Field, Main Central Segment, Yakama Nation, Washington By Wes Hildreth and Judy Fierstein Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3315 Photograph showing Mount Adams andesitic stratovolcano and Signal Peak mafic shield volcano viewed westward from near Mill Creek Guard Station. Low-relief rocky meadows and modest forested ridges marked by scattered cinder cones and shields are common landforms in Simcoe Mountains volcanic field. Mount Adams (elevation: 12,276 ft; 3,742 m) is centered 50 km west and 2.8 km higher than foreground meadow (elevation: 2,950 ft.; 900 m); its eruptions began ~520 ka, its upper cone was built in late Pleistocene, and several eruptions have taken place in the Holocene. Signal Peak (elevation: 5,100 ft; 1,555 m), 20 km west of camera, is one of largest and highest eruptive centers in Simcoe Mountains volcanic field; short-lived shield, built around 3.7 Ma, is seven times older than Mount Adams. 2015 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Introductory Overview for Non-Geologists ...............................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................2 Physiography, Environment, Boundary Surveys, and Access ......................................................6 Previous Geologic Work ......................................................................................................................9 Methods................................................................................................................................................10 Geologic Setting ...........................................................................................................................................10 Tectonic Framework ...........................................................................................................................10 Pre-Pliocene Rocks ............................................................................................................................12 Mount Adams Volcanic Field ............................................................................................................12 Simcoe Mountains Volcanic Field .............................................................................................................13 Central Segment..................................................................................................................................13 Eastern Plateaus ........................................................................................................................14 Simcoe Mountains Highland ....................................................................................................14 Central Swath of High Vent Density ........................................................................................16 Swath of Lesser Vent Density ..................................................................................................16 Western Swath ...........................................................................................................................16 Northern Segment ..............................................................................................................................18 Southern Segment ..............................................................................................................................19 Composition of Eruptive Products ....................................................................................................19 Volcano Hazards .................................................................................................................................24 Age Relations Among Volcanic Fields in Southern Washington .........................................................24 Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................................................25 Introduction to Description of Map Units ................................................................................................25 Description of Map Units ............................................................................................................................27 Surficial Deposits And Basement Rocks ........................................................................................27 Volcanic Rocks ....................................................................................................................................28 References Cited..........................................................................................................................................68 Figures 1. Map showing regional location of intraplate Simcoe Mountains volcanic field in south-central Washington. ....................................................................................................3 2A. Map showing regional setting of map area and Yakama Nation in south-central Washington. .............................................................................................................................4 2B. Regional physiography as digital elevation model, illustrating transition from rugged Cascade Range to Yakima Fold Belt .....................................................................................5 3. Map showing drainage of Simcoe Mountains volcanic field and vicinity, including locations of geographic names mentioned in text and in Description of Map Units. .........................................................................................................................................7 4. Map showing simplified tectonic map of Pacific Northwest, highlighting Simcoe Mountains volcanic field draping southwest part of Yakima Foldbelt, east of Cascade Arc axis. ................................................................................................................11 5. Vent locations for central segment of Simcoe Mountains volcanic field. ..........................15 6. FeO*/MgO versus weight percent SiO2 for ~1,250 samples from central segment of Simcoe Mountains volcanic field. .....................................................................................20 7. K2O versus SiO2, both in weight percent, for ~1,300 samples from central segment of Simcoe Mountains volcanic field. .....................................................................................21 i 8. Total alkalies versus silica (TAS) diagram of LeBas and others (1986), showing conventional chemical pigeon-holing of volcanic rock names for ~1,300 samples from central segment of Simcoe Mountains volcanic field. .........................................22 9. Ba and Zr versus Nb, all in ppm, for ~1,250 samples from central segment of Simcoe Mountains volcanic field. ...................................................................................................23 Table 1. 40Ar/39Ar ages for basalt samples from Simcoe Mountains volcanic field....................................72 Appendixes Appendix A. Chemical data for Simcoe Mountains volcanic field, main central segment...................................................................................................................... web only Appendix B. Whole-rock potassium-argon ages for units within or overlapping Simcoe Mountains volcanic field, main central segment. .............................................76 ii Are they assigned, or can the countries pick their colors? When still molten, rhyolite lava is much stiffer than basalt. – What suits the character or the native waters best. Instead of flowing freely, it creeps along like warm road tar and Topography displays no favorites; North’s as near as West. seldom advances far from its vent. Additionally, as a result of its More delicate than the historians’ are the map-makers’ colors. stiffness, rhyolite can be much more explosive than basalt. Deep Elizabeth Bishop from The Map (1935) below ground, all lava contains dissolved gases (water, sulfur, and carbon dioxide), which try to bubble away as the lava rises buoyantly to the surface from its higher-pressure subsurface Introductory Overview for confinement. If the depressurizing ascent is rapid, the stiffness of rhyolite retards escape of the gas, which instead makes the Non-Geologists lava froth up into an explosive foam of ash and pumice when it emerges into the atmosphere. Rhyolite lavas of the Simcoe Mountainous parts of the Yakama Nation lands in south- Mountains were certainly accompanied by such explosive central Washington are mostly covered by basaltic lava flows eruptions of ash and pumice, but most deposits of such loose and cinder cones that make up the Simcoe Mountains volcanic material have since been eroded away. A few remnants of the field (figs. 1–5). The accompanying geologic map of the ash deposits survive near Tenie Creek and along Highway 97 central part of the volcanic field has been produced by the U.S. north of Satus Pass, and stream-reworked rhyolite pumice is Geological Survey (USGS) on behalf of the Water Resources present in the alluvium downstream along Satus Creek. Program of the Yakama Nation. The volcanic terrain stretches Its lack of fluidity also helps hot rhyolitic lava oozing continuously from Mount Adams eastward as
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report
    RECONNAISSANCE SURFICIAL GEOLOGIC MAPPING OF THE LATE CENOZOIC SEDIMENTS OF THE COLUMBIA BASIN, WASHINGTON by James G. Rigby and Kurt Othberg with contributions from Newell Campbell Larry Hanson Eugene Kiver Dale Stradling Gary Webster Open File Report 79-3 September 1979 State of Washington Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources Olympia, Washington CONTENTS Introduction Objectives Study Area Regional Setting 1 Mapping Procedure 4 Sample Collection 8 Description of Map Units 8 Pre-Miocene Rocks 8 Columbia River Basalt, Yakima Basalt Subgroup 9 Ellensburg Formation 9 Gravels of the Ancestral Columbia River 13 Ringold Formation 15 Thorp Gravel 17 Gravel of Terrace Remnants 19 Tieton Andesite 23 Palouse Formation and Other Loess Deposits 23 Glacial Deposits 25 Catastrophic Flood Deposits 28 Background and previous work 30 Description and interpretation of flood deposits 35 Distinctive geomorphic features 38 Terraces and other features of undetermined origin 40 Post-Pleistocene Deposits 43 Landslide Deposits 44 Alluvium 45 Alluvial Fan Deposits 45 Older Alluvial Fan Deposits 45 Colluvium 46 Sand Dunes 46 Mirna Mounds and Other Periglacial(?) Patterned Ground 47 Structural Geology 48 Southwest Quadrant 48 Toppenish Ridge 49 Ah tanum Ridge 52 Horse Heaven Hills 52 East Selah Fault 53 Northern Saddle Mountains and Smyrna Bench 54 Selah Butte Area 57 Miscellaneous Areas 58 Northwest Quadrant 58 Kittitas Valley 58 Beebe Terrace Disturbance 59 Winesap Lineament 60 Northeast Quadrant 60 Southeast Quadrant 61 Recommendations 62 Stratigraphy 62 Structure 63 Summary 64 References Cited 66 Appendix A - Tephrochronology and identification of collected datable materials 82 Appendix B - Description of field mapping units 88 Northeast Quadrant 89 Northwest Quadrant 90 Southwest Quadrant 91 Southeast Quadrant 92 ii ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Snowmobiles in the Wilderness
    Snowmobiles in the Wilderness: You can help W a s h i n g t o n S t a t e P a r k s A necessary prohibition Join us in safeguarding winter recreation: Each year, more and more people are riding snowmobiles • When riding in a new area, obtain a map. into designated Wilderness areas, which is a concern for • Familiarize yourself with Wilderness land managers, the public and many snowmobile groups. boundaries, and don’t cross them. This may be happening for a variety of reasons: many • Carry the message to clubs, groups and friends. snowmobilers may not know where the Wilderness boundaries are or may not realize the area is closed. For more information about snowmobiling opportunities or Wilderness areas, please contact: Wilderness…a special place Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission (360) 902-8500 Established by Congress through the Wilderness Washington State Snowmobile Association (800) 784-9772 Act of 1964, “Wilderness” is a special land designation North Cascades National Park (360) 854-7245 within national forests and certain other federal lands. Colville National Forest (509) 684-7000 These areas were designated so that an untouched Gifford Pinchot National Forest (360) 891-5000 area of our wild lands could be maintained in a natural Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest (425) 783-6000 state. Also, they were set aside as places where people Mt. Rainier National Park (877) 270-7155 could get away from the sights and sounds of modern Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest (509) 664-9200 civilization and where elements of our cultural history Olympic National Forest (360) 956-2402 could be preserved.
    [Show full text]
  • 1922 Elizabeth T
    co.rYRIG HT, 192' The Moootainetro !scot1oror,d The MOUNTAINEER VOLUME FIFTEEN Number One D EC E M BER 15, 1 9 2 2 ffiount Adams, ffiount St. Helens and the (!oat Rocks I ncoq)Ora,tecl 1913 Organized 190!i EDITORlAL ST AitF 1922 Elizabeth T. Kirk,vood, Eclttor Margaret W. Hazard, Associate Editor· Fairman B. L�e, Publication Manager Arthur L. Loveless Effie L. Chapman Subsc1·iption Price. $2.00 per year. Annual ·(onl�') Se,·ent�·-Five Cents. Published by The Mountaineers lncorJ,orated Seattle, Washington Enlerecl as second-class matter December 15, 19t0. at the Post Office . at . eattle, "\Yash., under the .-\0t of March 3. 1879. .... I MOUNT ADAMS lllobcl Furrs AND REFLEC'rION POOL .. <§rtttings from Aristibes (. Jhoutribes Author of "ll3ith the <6obs on lltount ®l!!mµus" �. • � J� �·,,. ., .. e,..:,L....._d.L.. F_,,,.... cL.. ��-_, _..__ f.. pt",- 1-� r�._ '-';a_ ..ll.-�· t'� 1- tt.. �ti.. ..._.._....L- -.L.--e-- a';. ��c..L. 41- �. C4v(, � � �·,,-- �JL.,�f w/U. J/,--«---fi:( -A- -tr·�� �, : 'JJ! -, Y .,..._, e� .,...,____,� � � t-..__., ,..._ -u..,·,- .,..,_, ;-:.. � --r J /-e,-i L,J i-.,( '"'; 1..........,.- e..r- ,';z__ /-t.-.--,r� ;.,-.,.....__ � � ..-...,.,-<. ,.,.f--· :tL. ��- ''F.....- ,',L � .,.__ � 'f- f-� --"- ��7 � �. � �;')'... f ><- -a.c__ c/ � r v-f'.fl,'7'71.. I /!,,-e..-,K-// ,l...,"4/YL... t:l,._ c.J.� J..,_-...A 'f ',y-r/� �- lL.. ��•-/IC,/ ,V l j I '/ ;· , CONTENTS i Page Greetings .......................................................................tlristicles }!}, Phoiitricles ........ r The Mount Adams, Mount St. Helens, and the Goat Rocks Outing .......................................... B1/.ith Page Bennett 9 1 Selected References from Preceding Mount Adams and Mount St.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Basalts and Glacier Floods—Roadside Geology
    u 0 by Robert J. Carson and Kevin R. Pogue WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Information Circular 90 January 1996 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENTOF Natural Resources Jennifer M. Belcher - Commissioner of Public Lands Kaleen Cottingham - Supervisor FLOOD BASALTS AND GLACIER FLOODS: Roadside Geology of Parts of Walla Walla, Franklin, and Columbia Counties, Washington by Robert J. Carson and Kevin R. Pogue WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Information Circular 90 January 1996 Kaleen Cottingham - Supervisor Division of Geology and Earth Resources WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Jennifer M. Belcher-Commissio11er of Public Lands Kaleeo Cottingham-Supervisor DMSION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Raymond Lasmanis-State Geologist J. Eric Schuster-Assistant State Geologist William S. Lingley, Jr.-Assistant State Geologist This report is available from: Publications Washington Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources P.O. Box 47007 Olympia, WA 98504-7007 Price $ 3.24 Tax (WA residents only) ~ Total $ 3.50 Mail orders must be prepaid: please add $1.00 to each order for postage and handling. Make checks payable to the Department of Natural Resources. Front Cover: Palouse Falls (56 m high) in the canyon of the Palouse River. Printed oo recycled paper Printed io the United States of America Contents 1 General geology of southeastern Washington 1 Magnetic polarity 2 Geologic time 2 Columbia River Basalt Group 2 Tectonic features 5 Quaternary sedimentation 6 Road log 7 Further reading 7 Acknowledgments 8 Part 1 - Walla Walla to Palouse Falls (69.0 miles) 21 Part 2 - Palouse Falls to Lower Monumental Dam (27.0 miles) 26 Part 3 - Lower Monumental Dam to Ice Harbor Dam (38.7 miles) 33 Part 4 - Ice Harbor Dam to Wallula Gap (26.7 mi les) 38 Part 5 - Wallula Gap to Walla Walla (42.0 miles) 44 References cited ILLUSTRATIONS I Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inventory Chapter Summarizes the Fish and Wildlife Protection, Restoration, and Artificial Production Projects and Programs in the Yakima Subbasin
    Table of Contents: Chapter 3 1 Organization of the Inventory Chapter 3 2 Current Management Activities 4 2.1 International 4 2.1.1 United States-Canada Pacific Salmon Treaty 4 2.2 Federal Government 5 2.2.1 Bureau of Reclamation 5 2.2.2 Environmental Protection Agency 5 2.2.3 Fish and Wildlife Service 6 2.2.4 National Forest Service 6 2.2.5 Natural Resources Conservation Service 6 2.2.6 NOAA Fisheries 7 2.2.7 Yakima Training Center 7 2.3 Tribes 7 2.3.1 Yakama Nation 7 2.4 State Government 8 2.4.1 State of Washington 8 2.4.2 Washington Conservation Commission 9 2.4.3 Washington Department of Natural Resources 9 2.4.4 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 10 2.4.5 Washington Department of Ecology 11 2.4.6 Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation 11 2.4.7 Conservation Districts 11 2.5 Local Government 11 2.5.1 Growth Management Act 12 2.5.2 Shoreline Management Act 12 2.5.3 State Environmental Policy Act 12 2.5.4 Benton County 13 2.5.5 Kittitas County 13 2.5.6 Yakima County 14 2.5.7 City of Yakima 14 2.5.8 Tri-County Water Resources Agency 15 2.5.9 Roza-Sunnyside Board of Joint Control (RSBOJC) 15 2.6 Other 16 2.6.1 Timber Fish and Wildlife Agreement 16 2.6.2 Agriculture, Fish, and Water (AFW) Process 16 Chapter 3-1 2.6.3 The Nature Conservancy 16 2.6.4 Tapteal Greenway 16 2.6.5 Washington Trout 17 2.6.6 Pheasants Forever 17 2.6.7 Ducks Unlimited 17 2.6.8 Cowiche Canyon Conservancy 17 2.6.9 Yakima Greenway Foundation 18 2.7 Major Umbrella Programs, Projects, or Organizations 18 2.7.1 Yakima Tributary Access and Habitat Program (YTAHP)
    [Show full text]
  • (2000), Voluminous Lava-Like Precursor to a Major Ash-Flow
    Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 98 (2000) 153–171 www.elsevier.nl/locate/jvolgeores Voluminous lava-like precursor to a major ash-flow tuff: low-column pyroclastic eruption of the Pagosa Peak Dacite, San Juan volcanic field, Colorado O. Bachmanna,*, M.A. Dungana, P.W. Lipmanb aSection des Sciences de la Terre de l’Universite´ de Gene`ve, 13, Rue des Maraıˆchers, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland bUS Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Rd, Menlo Park, CA, USA Received 26 May 1999; received in revised form 8 November 1999; accepted 8 November 1999 Abstract The Pagosa Peak Dacite is an unusual pyroclastic deposit that immediately predated eruption of the enormous Fish Canyon Tuff (ϳ5000 km3) from the La Garita caldera at 28 Ma. The Pagosa Peak Dacite is thick (to 1 km), voluminous (Ͼ200 km3), and has a high aspect ratio (1:50) similar to those of silicic lava flows. It contains a high proportion (40–60%) of juvenile clasts (to 3–4 m) emplaced as viscous magma that was less vesiculated than typical pumice. Accidental lithic fragments are absent above the basal 5–10% of the unit. Thick densely welded proximal deposits flowed rheomorphically due to gravitational spreading, despite the very high viscosity of the crystal-rich magma, resulting in a macroscopic appearance similar to flow- layered silicic lava. Although it is a separate depositional unit, the Pagosa Peak Dacite is indistinguishable from the overlying Fish Canyon Tuff in bulk-rock chemistry, phenocryst compositions, and 40Ar/39Ar age. The unusual characteristics of this deposit are interpreted as consequences of eruption by low-column pyroclastic fountaining and lateral transport as dense, poorly inflated pyroclastic flows.
    [Show full text]
  • State Parks and Recreation Commission
    Table 1 Ten Year Capital Plan Project Listing Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Prior Reapprop. New Approp. New Approp. New Approp. New Approp. New Approp. Major Function, Agency, Project Estimate Total Expenditures 2017-19 2017-19 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 2025-27 State Parks and Recreation Commission 30000086 Twin Harbors State Park: Relocate Campground State Building Construction Account - State 26,482,000 496,000 1,310,000 12,338,000 12,338,000 30000100 Fort Flagler - WW1 Historic Facilities Preservation State Building Construction Account - State 7,639,000 430,000 3,386,000 3,823,000 30000109 Fort Casey - Lighthouse Historic Preservation State Building Construction Account - State 1,616,000 217,000 1,399,000 30000155 Fort Simcoe - Historic Officers Quarters Renovation State Building Construction Account - State 1,770,000 292,000 1,478,000 30000253 Iron Horse - John Wayne Trail - Repair Tunnels Trestles Culv Ph 3 State Building Construction Account - State 4,877,000 606,000 4,271,000 30000287 Fort Worden - Housing Areas Exterior Improvements State Building Construction Account - State 6,605,000 500,000 1,043,000 2,461,000 2,601,000 30000305 Sun Lakes State Park: Dry Falls Campground Renovation State Building Construction Account - State 402,000 52,000 350,000 30000328 Camp Wooten Dining Hall Replacement State Building Construction Account - State 2,563,000 326,000 2,237,000 Table 1 Ten Year Capital Plan Project Listing Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Prior Reapprop. New Approp. New Approp. New Approp. New Approp. New Approp.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2017 Recently Went Back to the Boreas Ponds, Hauling My Hornbeck the 3.6 Miles to the Dam Since Opening the Road All the Way to the Dam
    Adirondack Mountain Club Keene Valley Chapter I hope you have had a great year. Winter was lovely here with lots of powder for back- country skiing. I was fortunate enough to ski into the Boreas Ponds once this winter. It’s a 6.7 mile ski one way to the dam. It is really a spectacular addition to the Forest Perserve, but these lands are still unclassified by the DEC. There has been much debate since the state purchased them. I Summer 2017 recently went back to the Boreas ponds, hauling my Hornbeck the 3.6 miles to the dam since opening the road all the way to the dam. At this Gulf Brook Rd has reopened for the summer. point I am leaning towards closing the road alto- I’m often asked what my opinion is on the fate of gether. I like the idea of a shorter haul for bring- the Boreas Ponds. Should road access be allowed ing a canoe in, but if it’s too short of a walk, it will all the way to the dam? Should it be allowed to where be a draw for more people. it currently is, with a 3.6 mile walk or bike to the On topic of overuse, it saddens me that dam? Or should it be cut off at Blue Ridge Park- hikers have become so disrespectful that the way? My viewpoint has changed in the past year. owners of Owl’s Head in Keene have decided to Here’s why: We’ve seen an increasing number of close the trail to this popular mountain on week- hikers in the High Peaks.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropological Study of Yakama Tribe
    1 Anthropological Study of Yakama Tribe: Traditional Resource Harvest Sites West of the Crest of the Cascades Mountains in Washington State and below the Cascades of the Columbia River Eugene Hunn Department of Anthropology Box 353100 University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195-3100 [email protected] for State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife WDFW contract # 38030449 preliminary draft October 11, 2003 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 4 Executive Summary 5 Map 1 5f 1. Goals and scope of this report 6 2. Defining the relevant Indian groups 7 2.1. How Sahaptin names for Indian groups are formed 7 2.2. The Yakama Nation 8 Table 1: Yakama signatory tribes and bands 8 Table 2: Yakama headmen and chiefs 8-9 2.3. Who are the ―Klickitat‖? 10 2.4. Who are the ―Cascade Indians‖? 11 2.5. Who are the ―Cowlitz‖/Taitnapam? 11 2.6. The Plateau/Northwest Coast cultural divide: Treaty lines versus cultural 12 divides 2.6.1. The Handbook of North American Indians: Northwest Coast versus 13 Plateau 2.7. Conclusions 14 3. Historical questions 15 3.1. A brief summary of early Euroamerican influences in the region 15 3.2. How did Sahaptin-speakers end up west of the Cascade crest? 17 Map 2 18f 3.3. James Teit‘s hypothesis 18 3.4. Melville Jacobs‘s counter argument 19 4. The Taitnapam 21 4.1. Taitnapam sources 21 4.2. Taitnapam affiliations 22 4.3. Taitnapam territory 23 4.3.1. Jim Yoke and Lewy Costima on Taitnapam territory 24 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan 2025
    Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan 2025 December 2006 Final Adopted Version YAKIMA URBAN AREA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2025 YAKIMA CITY COUNCIL YAKIMA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Dave Edler, Mayor Ronald Gamache Neil McClure, Assistant Mayor Mike Leita Ron Bonlender Jesse Palacios Micah Cawley Norm Johnson Bill Lover Susan Whitman Richard A. Zais, City Manager YAKIMA URBAN AREA REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Deb Patterson, Chair Ted Marquis, Jr. Charlotte Baldwin Bernie Kline Jerry Craig Rockey Marshall John Hodkinson CITY OF YAKIMA COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT William Cook, Director Doug Maples, Code Administration & Planning Manager CITIZENS AND NEIGHBORHOODS OF THE YAKIMA URBAN AREA Adopted December 12, 2006 Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan Fact Sheet - i YAKIMA URBAN AREA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2025 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................I-1 Yakima Since 1997 ....................................................................................................................I-4 Comprehensive Planning History...............................................................................................I-4 The 1981 Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan .................................................................I-6 The Growth Management Act ....................................................................................................I-6 The 2006 Comprehensive Plan..................................................................................................I-6
    [Show full text]
  • Primitive Magmas at Five Cascade Volcanic Fields 413
    397 The Canadian M ine ralo g i st Vol. 35, pp. 397423 (1997) PRIMITIVEMAGMAS AT FIVECASCADE VOLCANIC FIELDS: MELTSFROM HOT, HETEROGENEOUS SUB.ARC MANTLE CHARLES R. BACONI, PEGGY E. BRUGGMAN, ROBERT L. CHRISTIANSEN, MICHAEL A. CLYNNE" JULIE M. DONNELLY-NOLAN ANDWES HILDRETH U.S.Geological Survey, 345 Mitdl.efield Road" Mmlo Parh Califurnia94025-3591,U.SA. ABSTRACT Major and trace elementconcenftations, including REE by isotopedilution, and Sr, Nd, Pb, and O isotoperatios have been determinedfor 38 mafic lavasfrom the Mount Adams,Crater Lake, Mount ShastaMedicine Lake, and Lassenvolcanic flelds, in the Cascadearc, northwestempart of the United States.Many of the sampleshave a high Mg# tl@Mg/(Mg + FeD > 601and Ni content(>140 ppm) suchthat we considerthem to be primitive. We rccognlzerhree end-member p:,jmillrve magma groups in the Cascades,characterized mainly by their trace-elementand alkali-metal abundances:(1) High-alumina olivine tholeiite (HAOT) hastrace element abundaaces similarto N-MORB, exceptfor slightly elevatedLllE, andhas Eu/Eu* > 1. (2) Arc basalt andbasaltic andesite have notably higher L/lE contents,generally have higher SiO2contents, are more oxidized andhave higher Cr for a given Ni abundancethan HAOT. Theselavas show relative depletioninl/F.i4 havelowerl/ftEE andhigherl,ftEEthan HAOT, andhave smallerEulEu* (0.94-1.06).(3) Alkali basaltfrom the Simcoevolcanic field eastof Mount Adamsreprcsents the third end-membr, which contributesan intraplate geochemicalsigpature to magna compositions.Notable geochemical featuresamong
    [Show full text]
  • Lewis River Hydroelectric Project Relicensing
    United StatesDepartment of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Western Washington Fish and Wildlife Office 510 DesmondDr. SE, Suite 102 Lacey,Washington 98503 In ReplyRefer To: SCANNED 1-3-06-F-0177 sEPI 5 2006 MagalieR. Salas,Secretary F6deralEnergy Regulatory Commission 888First Sffeet,NE WashingtonD.C. 24426 Attention:Ann Ariel Vecchio DearSecretary Salas: This documenttransmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's(Service) Biological Opinion on the effectsto bull trout(Salvelinus confluentus),northern spotted owls (Srrlxoccidentalis caurina)and bald eagles(Haliaeetus leucocephalus) fromthe relicensingof the Lewis River HydroeiectricProjects: Merwin (FERC No. 935),Yale (FERC No. 2071),Swift No. 1 (FERC No. Zr 11),and swift No. 2 (FERCNo. 2213). Theaction that comprises this consultationunder theEndangered Species Act of 1973,as amended (16 U.S.C. l53I et seq.)is therelicensing of the Lewis-RiverHydroelectric Projects by the FederalEnergy Regulatory Commission and the interdependentactions contained in the SettlementAgreement (PacifiCorp et aL.2004e),dated November30,2004,and Washington Department of Ecology's401 Certifications. Consultationfor the relicensingof the Lewis River Plojectswas initiated by the Commission's letterto the Servicewhich was received in our officeon October11,2005. Based on our letter datedMarch15,2006,the deadline for completingthis consultationwas extended by mutual agreementuntil May 5, 2006. On June12,2006,with concurrenceby thelicensees,we submittedanother request for an extensionto SeptemberI,2006, to
    [Show full text]