DOCSLIB.ORG

Virginia Master Naturalist Introducson to Ichthyology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Virginia Master Naturalist Introduc3on to Ichthyology Paul Bugas Region 4 Aquacs Manager Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries VDGIF Mission Statement • To conserve and manage wildlife populations and habitat for the benefit of present and future generations • To connect people to Virginia’s outdoors through boating, education, fishing, hunting, trapping, wildlife viewing, and other wildlife- related activities • To protect people and property by promoting safe outdoor experiences and managing human-wildlife conflicts “To keep every cog and wheel is the first precaution of intelligent tinkering” Aldo Leopold Biodiversity Biodiversi ty Early Ichthyologists Edward Drinker Cope (1840- 1897) Renown Paleontologist Wealthy Quaker Background Published 1,400 Papers David Starr Jordan (1851 – 1931) President of Stanford University Espoused Eugenics Edward C. Raney (1909 – 1952) Ichthyology (from Greek: ἰχθύς, ikhthus, "fish"; and λόγος, logos, "study") Freshwater Fishes of Virginia • Fish families • Families and their habitats • Major family representaves • Species distribuon • Endemics What is a Fish? • Cold-blooded animal • Fins • Gills • Scales • Slime coat • Lateral line • Gas bladder • Osmoregulaon Fish Senses • Taste – fish oen “spit out” unsavory food items; taste buds on barbels, top of head, in mouth, or on lips • Touch – fish oen “mouth” food items; lateral line is a sensory organ • Hearing – sound is picked up by bones in head; some fish have bones connected to air bladder; earstones or otoliths • Sight – can oen discern brightness and color; cannot see straight down or back • Smell – most have well developed sense of smell (Social) (Unknown) (Power) (Steering & Braking) (Stability) (Anti-roll) Reasons for High Diversity of Fish Species in Virginia Climate and Physiography • high rainfall • geology and topography complex • unglaciated • historical and recent diversity of aquatic environment Biological • high speciation rates due to complex dispersal history Pleistocene Epoch ended 12,000 years ago Drainage Basins in Virginia Interior Atlantic Slope Rivers of Virginia Virginia’s 10 Major Drainages Potomac York Big Sandy New James Rappahannock Roanoke Chowan Tennessee PeeDee 2 x 1000) 30 Virginia’s 10 Major Drainages 25 Drainage Area (Km 20 15 10 5 0 James Roanoke Potomac Chowan Tennessee New Rappahannock York Big Sandy Pee Dee Native Fish Species in Virginia’s Major Drainages 120 Natives Natives and Introduced 100 80 60 40 20 Number of Fish Species 0 Virginia’s Endemic Fish Species 16 12 8 4 Number of Fish Species 0 New James Roanoke Potomac Tennessee Physiographic Provinces in Virginia Valley and Ridge Appalachian Plateau Blue Ridge Piedmont Coastal Plain Fish Taxonomy • Kingdom - Animalia – Phylum – Chordata • possess a notochord at some point in development • Class – Osteichthyes (Bony fishes) or Supraclass for jawless fish (Agnatha) such as lampreys – Order – Cypriniformes » Minnows and suckers – Order – Salmoniformes » Salmon and trout – Order Perciformes » Perch-like (two dorsal fins - separated) Virginia’s Freshwater Fish 25 Families Petromyzontidae Umbridae Atherinidae Acipenseridae Cyprinidae Fundulidae Polyodontidae Catostomidae Poeciliidae Lepisosteidae Ictaluridae Cottidae Amiidae Salmonidae Moronidae Anguillidae Gaserosteidae Centrarchidae Clupeidae Aphredoderidae Percidae Esocidae Amblyopsidae Sciaenidae Channidae 227 Species 235 taxa Freshwater Fish Families in Virginia Number of Fish Species by State > 220 188 153 188 200-219 201 220 180-199 257 150-179 200 257 219 100-149 < 100 Mountain Trout Streams Trout Sculpin Large Streams Minnow Perch Sucker Large Rivers Catfish Muskellunge Paddlefish Swamps Sunfish Pirate Perch Swampfish Lampreys Atlantic sturgeon Longnose gar James River Percidae Watershed Minnows • 2,000+ species – largest fish family • Largest in VA – Common carp • 320 in North America • Jaws lack teeth • Only found in freshwater • Major component of the food web Minnows (Chubs) Bluehead Chub Bigmouth Chub River Chub Bull Chub Perch • 235 species worldwide • Teeth on jaw • 217 in North America • Two dorsal fins • Darters comprise 214 members • High economic and ecological • All but one darter species occurs importance east of the continental divide Candy darter Credit: Derek Wheaton Perch (Logperch) Roanoke Logperch Blotchside Logperch Logperch Moronidae White Bass Striped Bass Hybrid Striped Bass White Perch James River Drainage Endemics Derek Wheaton Roughhead Shiner Longfin Darter Threats to Freshwater Fish • Dams and their associated operations • Exotic Species • Loss of habitat Diadromous Fishes • Anadromous Fish - Fish that spend their adult life in the ocean (salt water) and migrate up coastal rivers to spawn in fresh-water. • American Eels are Virginia’s Catadromous species, which spend their adult life in fresh-water and migrate to the ocean to spawn. • These species need habitat conservation from mountain streams to the ocean. Exotic Species Introductions Zebra Mussels Wooly Adelgid - Exotic Invasive • An exotic insect that is destroying our native Hemlock trees along streams. • How could the loss of these Hemlocks effect the stream ecosystem? Health Issues with Smallmouth Bass ECOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS FRAGMENTATION AND EDGE EFFECT As the human population continues to grow, development reduces and fragments remaining undisturbed habitat. Point Source Pollution Non-Point Source Pollution Channelization Urban Impacts Erosion Nutrification Unrestricted Cattle Strategies for Aquatic Habitat Improvement Wetlands Protection • Filter out nutrients and pollutants • Flood control • Groundwater recharge areas • Habitat for rare and endangered species Healthy Riparian Area • Filter runoff removing excess nutrients and sediments. • Helps stabilize the stream banks from erosion. • Provides shade to the stream to reduce water temperature. • Increases fish and aquatic habitat quality and quantity. • Provides food and “energy to aquatic organisms (leaf litter). Fencing and Riparian Buffer Restoration Strategies for Aquatic Habitat Improvement Before Rural Stream Restoration During After Before Urban Stream Restoration During After Dump & Sinkhole Clean-ups Electrofishing Trap Nets Hatcheries & Fish Stocking Creel Surveys Gill nets “In the end, we will conserve only what we love. We will love only what we understand. We will understand only what we are taught.” - Buba Dioum Credit: Lance Merry Books Ø Freshwater Fishes of Virginia Ø Robert E. Jenkins and Noel M. Burkhead Ø Available from http://www.afsbooks.org/ - $110 Ø Fish Watching: An Outdoor Guide to Freshwater Fishes Ø C. Lavett Smith Ø Amazon.com - $27 Ø Freshwater Fishes of the Carolinas, Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware Ø Fred C. Rohde, Rudolf G. Arndt, David G. Lindquist, and James F. Parnell Ø Amazon.com - $7 to $25 http://web1.cnre.vt.edu/efish/ .
Recommended publications
  • North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Gordon Myers, Executive Director

    North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Gordon Myers, Executive Director

    North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Gordon Myers, Executive Director March 1, 2016 Honorable Jimmy Dixon Honorable Chuck McGrady N.C. House of Representatives N.C. House of Representatives 300 N. Salisbury Street, Room 416B 300 N. Salisbury Street, Room 304 Raleigh, NC 27603-5925 Raleigh, NC 27603-5925 Senator Trudy Wade N.C. Senate 300 N. Salisbury Street, Room 521 Raleigh, NC 27603-5925 Dear Honorables: I am submitting this report to the Environmental Review Committee in fulfillment of the requirements of Section 4.33 of Session Law 2015-286 (H765). As directed, this report includes a review of methods and criteria used by the NC Wildlife Resources Commission on the State protected animal list as defined in G.S. 113-331 and compares them to federal and state agencies in the region. This report also reviews North Carolina policies specific to introduced species along with determining recommendations for improvements to these policies among state and federally listed species as well as nonlisted animals. If you have questions or need additional information, please contact me by phone at (919) 707-0151 or via email at [email protected]. Sincerely, Gordon Myers Executive Director North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Report on Study Conducted Pursuant to S.L. 2015-286 To the Environmental Review Commission March 1, 2016 Section 4.33 of Session Law 2015-286 (H765) directed the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) to “review the methods and criteria by which it adds, removes, or changes the status of animals on the state protected animal list as defined in G.S.

  • Amblyopsidae, Amblyopsis)

    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 412:The 41–57 Hoosier(2014) cavefish, a new and endangered species( Amblyopsidae, Amblyopsis)... 41 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.412.7245 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research The Hoosier cavefish, a new and endangered species (Amblyopsidae, Amblyopsis) from the caves of southern Indiana Prosanta Chakrabarty1,†, Jacques A. Prejean1,‡, Matthew L. Niemiller1,2,§ 1 Museum of Natural Science, Ichthyology Section, 119 Foster Hall, Department of Biological Sciences, Loui- siana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA 2 University of Kentucky, Department of Biology, 200 Thomas Hunt Morgan Building, Lexington, KY 40506, USA † http://zoobank.org/0983DBAB-2F7E-477E-9138-63CED74455D3 ‡ http://zoobank.org/C71C7313-142D-4A34-AA9F-16F6757F15D1 § http://zoobank.org/8A0C3B1F-7D0A-4801-8299-D03B6C22AD34 Corresponding author: Prosanta Chakrabarty ([email protected]) Academic editor: C. Baldwin | Received 12 February 2014 | Accepted 13 May 2014 | Published 29 May 2014 http://zoobank.org/C618D622-395E-4FB7-B2DE-16C65053762F Citation: Chakrabarty P, Prejean JA, Niemiller ML (2014) The Hoosier cavefish, a new and endangered species (Amblyopsidae, Amblyopsis) from the caves of southern Indiana. ZooKeys 412: 41–57. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.412.7245 Abstract We describe a new species of amblyopsid cavefish (Percopsiformes: Amblyopsidae) in the genus Amblyopsis from subterranean habitats of southern Indiana, USA. The Hoosier Cavefish, Amblyopsis hoosieri sp. n., is distinguished from A. spelaea, its only congener, based on genetic, geographic, and morphological evi- dence. Several morphological features distinguish the new species, including a much plumper, Bibendum- like wrinkled body with rounded fins, and the absence of a premature stop codon in the gene rhodopsin.
  • A SUMMARY of the LIFE HISTORY and DISTRIBUTION of the SPRING CAVEFISH, Chologaster ]Gassizi, PUTNAM, with POPULATION ESTIMATES for the SPECIES in SOUTHERN ILLINOIS

    A SUMMARY of the LIFE HISTORY and DISTRIBUTION of the SPRING CAVEFISH, Chologaster ]Gassizi, PUTNAM, with POPULATION ESTIMATES for the SPECIES in SOUTHERN ILLINOIS

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository A SUMMARY OF THE LIFE HISTORY AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE SPRING CAVEFISH, Chologaster ]gassizi, PUTNAM, WITH POPULATION ESTIMATES FOR THE SPECIES IN SOUTHERN ILLINOIS PHILIP W. SMITH -NORBERT M. WELCH Biological Notes No.104 Illinois Natural History Survey Urbana, Illinois • May 1978 State of Illinois Department of Registration and Education Natural History Survey Division A Summary of the life History and Distribution of the Spring Cavefish~ Chologasfer agassizi Putnam~ with Population Estimates for the Species in Southern Illinois Philip W. Smith and Norbert M. Welch The genus Chologaster, which means mutilated belly various adaptations and comparative metabolic rates of in reference to the absence of pelvic fins, was proposed all known amblyopsids. The next major contribution to by Agassiz ( 1853: 134) for a new fish found in ditches our knowledge was a series of papers by Hill, who worked and rice fields of South Carolina and described by him with the Warren County, Kentucky, population of spring as C. cornutus. Putnam (1872:30) described a second cave fish and described oxygen preferences ( 1968), food species of the genus found in a well at Lebanon, Tennes­ and feeding habits ( 1969a), effects of isolation upon see, naming it C. agassizi for the author of the generic meristic characters ( 1969b ), and the development of name. Forbes ( 1881:232) reported one specimen of squamation in the young ( 1971). Whittaker & Hill Chologaster from a spring in western Union County, ( 1968) described a new species of cestode parasite, nam­ Illinois, and noted that it differed from known specimens ing it Proteocephalus chologasteri.
  • Virginia Master Naturalists Introduction to Ichthyology

    Virginia Master Naturalists Introduction to Ichthyology

    !"#$"%"&'(&)*+#',&*-#&.")*) /%*#01-2*"0%'*0'/23*340.0$4' 5&-.'6-$&)' 7+$"0%'8'9:-&*"2)'(&%&$+#' VDGIF Mission Statement • To conserve and manage wildlife populations and habitat for the benefit of present and future generations • To connect people to Virginia’s outdoors through boating, education, fishing, hunting, trapping, wildlife viewing, and other wildlife- related activities • To protect people and property by promoting safe outdoor experiences and managing human-wildlife conflicts “To keep every cog and wheel is the first precaution of intelligent tinkering” Aldo Leopold 6"01";+#)"*4' Biodiversi ty <&#.4'/23*340.0$")*)' Edward Drinker Cope (1840- 1897) Renown Paleontologist Wealthy Quaker Background Published 1,400 Papers David Starr Jordan (1851 – 1931) President of Stanford University Espoused Eugenics Edward C. Raney (1909 – 1952) Ichthyology (from Greek: !"#$%, ikhthus, "fish"; and &'()%, logos, "study") Freshwater Fishes of Virginia • Fish families • Families and their habitats • Major family representatives • Species distribution • Endemics What is a Fish? • Cold-blooded animal • Fins • Gills • Scales • Mucoprotein coat • Lateral line • Gas bladder • Osmoregulation Fish Senses • Taste – fish often “spit out” unsavory food items; taste buds on barbels, top of head, in mouth, or on lips • Touch – fish often “mouth” food items; lateral line is a sensory organ • Hearing – sound is picked up by bones in head; some fish have bones connected to air bladder; earstones or otoliths • Sight – can often discern brightness and color;
  • Striped Bass

    Striped Bass

    Can you tell the difference between a striped bass, a white bass and a striped bass hybrid? Anglers need to know the differences between these spe- cies because different sizes, seasons and creel limits apply to striped bass and striped bass hybrids, and to white bass. Knowing the differences between these species can also help you better understand Pennsylvania fishes and our wa- ters. These fish belong to the family Moronidae, temperate basses, also known as “true” basses. In Pennsylvania, this family also includes the white perch. Moronidae species are medium-sized to large-sized active predators and prized trophy and sport fishes. Some species live only in fresh water, while others are anadromous they spend much of their lives in salt water or brackish water but return to fresh water to spawn. Striped Bass Morone saxatilis Identification: The striped bass has a smoothly arched pro- file, slimmer and more streamlined than a striped bass hybrid, until it reaches a weight of five to 10 pounds, when its body becomes heavy-looking. The back is olive-green to steely blue- gray, sometimes almost black. The sides are silvery to pale rapidly and stay in brackish bays at the end of their downstream silvery-green, shading to white on the belly. There are seven float. Juveniles spend their first and second summers in the or eight distinct dark stripes that run laterally on the side of tidal Delaware River with most inhabitating that area from the the body. Striped bass have two dorsal fins, the front spiny- Schuylkill River downstream into the state of Delaware.
  • B4683 NRTR.Pdf

    B4683 NRTR.Pdf

    NATURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT Replace Bridge No. 20 on SR-1152 over South Deep Creek Yadkin County, North Carolina TIP B-4683 Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1152(12) WBS Element No. 38466.1.FD2 THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit Natural Environment Section June 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 1 2.0 METHODOLOGY AND QUALIFICATIONS ...................................................... 1 3.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES ....................................................................................... 2 3.1 Soils ...................................................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Water Resources ................................................................................................................. 2 4.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES .............................................................................................. 3 4.1 Terrestrial Communities .................................................................................................... 3 4.1.1 Maintained/Disturbed ..................................................................................................... 3 4.1.2 Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) ..................................................... 3 4.1.3 Piedmont Alluvial Forest ..............................................................................................
  • Genetic Analysis of Whole Mitochondrial Genome of Lateolabrax Maculatus (Perciformes: Moronidae) Indicates the Presence of Two Populations Along the Chinese Coast

    Genetic Analysis of Whole Mitochondrial Genome of Lateolabrax Maculatus (Perciformes: Moronidae) Indicates the Presence of Two Populations Along the Chinese Coast

    ZOOLOGIA 37: e49046 ISSN 1984-4689 (online) zoologia.pensoft.net RESEARCH ARTICLE Genetic analysis of whole mitochondrial genome of Lateolabrax maculatus (Perciformes: Moronidae) indicates the presence of two populations along the Chinese coast Jie Gong 1,2, Baohua Chen 1,2, Bijun Li 1, Zhixiong Zhou 1, Yue Shi 1, Qiaozhen Ke 1,3, Dianchang Zhang 4, Peng Xu 1,2,3 1Fujian Key Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding of Marine Organisms, Xiamen University. 361000 Xiamen, China. 2Shenzhen Research Institute, Xiamen University. 518000 Shenzhen, China. 3State Key Laboratory of Large Yellow Croaker Breeding, Ningde Fufa Fisheries Company Limited. 352130 Ningde, China. 4South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences. 510300 Guangzhou, China. Corresponding author: Peng Xu ([email protected]) http://zoobank.org/B5BBA46C-7FC5-44C3-B9CE-19F8E93FAA1C ABSTRACT. The whole mitochondrial genome of Lateolabrax maculatus (Cuvier, 1828) was used to investigate the reasons for the observed patterns of genetic differentiation among 12 populations in northern and southern China. The haplotype diversity and nucleotide diversity of L. maculatus were 0.998 and 0.00169, respectively. Pairwise FST values between popula- tions ranged from 0.001 to 0.429, correlating positively with geographic distance. Genetic structure analysis and haplotype network analysis indicated that these populations were split into two groups, in agreement with geographic segregation and environment. Tajima’s D values, Fu’s Fs tests and Bayesian skyline plot (BSP) indicated that a demographic expansion event may have occurred in the history of L. maculatus. Through selection pressure analysis, we found evidence of significant negative selection at the ATP6, ND3, Cytb, COX3, COX2 and COX1 genes.
  • Information on the NCWRC's Scientific Council of Fishes Rare

    Information on the NCWRC's Scientific Council of Fishes Rare

    A Summary of the 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes in North Carolina Submitted by Bryn H. Tracy North Carolina Division of Water Resources North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Raleigh, NC On behalf of the NCWRC’s Scientific Council of Fishes November 01, 2014 Bigeye Jumprock, Scartomyzon (Moxostoma) ariommum, State Threatened Photograph by Noel Burkhead and Robert Jenkins, courtesy of the Virginia Division of Game and Inland Fisheries and the Southeastern Fishes Council (http://www.sefishescouncil.org/). Table of Contents Page Introduction......................................................................................................................................... 3 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes In North Carolina ........... 4 Summaries from the 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes in North Carolina .......................................................................................................................... 12 Recent Activities of NCWRC’s Scientific Council of Fishes .................................................. 13 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part I, Ohio Lamprey .............................................. 14 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part II, “Atlantic” Highfin Carpsucker ...................... 17 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part III, Tennessee Darter ...................................... 20 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part
  • Endangered Species

    Endangered Species

    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
  • First Record of F2 Hybrid Striped Bass (Morone Chrysops ♀ × Morone Saxatilis ♂ × Morone Chrysops ♀ × Morone Saxatilis ♂) in Kemer Dam Lake

    First Record of F2 Hybrid Striped Bass (Morone Chrysops ♀ × Morone Saxatilis ♂ × Morone Chrysops ♀ × Morone Saxatilis ♂) in Kemer Dam Lake

    Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2014) 38: 637-641 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1304-42 First record of F2 hybrid striped bass (Morone chrysops ♀ × Morone saxatilis ♂ × Morone chrysops ♀ × Morone saxatilis ♂) in Kemer Dam Lake 1, 2 Volkan KIZAK *, Yusuf GÜNER 1 Fisheries Faculty, Tunceli University, Tunceli, Turkey 2 Fisheries Faculty, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey Received: 26.04.2013 Accepted: 19.03.2014 Published Online: 14.07.2014 Printed: 13.08.2014 Abstract: The morphometric and meristic characters of 2 F2 hybrid striped bass (M. chrysops ♀ × M. saxatilis ♂ × M. chrysops ♀ × M. saxatilis ♂) from the family Moronidae are described. Two specimens were caught from Kemer Dam Lake. The body of the F2 hybrid striped bass was elongated, moderately compressed, and scaly. Dorsal surface and sides were silver and black to olive-gray, and the abdomen was white in color. Four or 5 longitudinal broken stripes ran above the lateral line to the caudal fin. The stripes were less visible behind the pectoral fins and below the lateral line. The bodies of the2 F specimens were deeper than 1/4 the fork length. The 2 dorsal fins were separated entirely. The first dorsal fin had 8–9 spines, and the second dorsal fin had a spine and 13–14 soft rays. The caudal fin was slightly forked. The anal fin had 3 spines with 12–14 soft rays. One tooth patch was present on the anterior of the tongue. According to our results, the fish were 2F hybrid striped bass offspring of 1F hybrid striped bass, which can reproduce naturally in Turkey.
  • Low-Head Dams Facilitate Round Goby Neogobius Melanostomus Invasion

    Low-Head Dams Facilitate Round Goby Neogobius Melanostomus Invasion

    Biol Invasions (2018) 20:757–776 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1573-3 ORIGINAL PAPER Low-head dams facilitate Round Goby Neogobius melanostomus invasion Dustin Raab . Nicholas E. Mandrak . Anthony Ricciardi Received: 9 July 2017 / Accepted: 23 September 2017 / Published online: 3 October 2017 Ó Springer International Publishing AG 2017 Abstract Round Goby Neogobius melanostomus inclusion of both reservoir-associated abiotic variables invasion of the Grand River (Ontario, Canada) and Round Goby abundance as model terms. To presents an opportunity to assess the role of abiotic determine establishment potential of the uninvaded gradients in mediating the establishment and impact of reach immediately upstream, four environmental nonnative benthic fishes in rivers. In this system, habitat characteristics were used in discriminant sequential low-head dams delineate uninvaded and function analysis (DFA) to predict three potential invaded river reaches and create upstream gradients of outcomes of introduction: non-invaded and either increasing water velocity. We hypothesized that flow lower or higher Round Goby abundance (low and high refugia created by impounded reservoirs above low- invasion status, respectively) than the median number head dams enhance local Round Goby abundance. of Round Goby at invaded sites. Our DFA function Round Goby influence on the native fish community correctly classified non-invaded and high-abundance was determined by variance partitioning, and we used invasion status sites [ 85% of the time, with lower generalized additive models to identify small-bodied (73%) success in classifying low-abundance invasion benthic fish species most likely to be impacted by status sites, and the spatial pattern of our results Round Goby invasion.
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S

    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S

    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................