DOCSLIB.ORG

Factors Influencing Stream Fish Recovery Following a Large-Scale Disturbance WILLIAM E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Factors Influencing Stream Fish Recovery Following a Large-Scale Disturbance WILLIAM E Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 126:895-907, 1997 © Copyright by ihe American Fisheries Society 1997 Factors Influencing Stream Fish Recovery Following a Large-Scale Disturbance WILLIAM E. ENSIGN' and KEVIN N. LEFTwiCH2 Department Fisheriesof Wildlifeand Sciences, Virginia Tech Blackshitrg, Virginia 24061-0321, USA PAUL L. ANGERMEIER U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division Virginia Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit,* Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0321.USA . ANDREC W DOLLOFF U.S. Forest Sen'ice, Southern Research Station, Virginia Tech Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0321. USA Abstract.—We examined fish distribution and abundance in erosional habitat units in South Fork Roanoke River, Virginia, following a fish kill by using a reachwide sampling approach for 3 species and a representative-reach sampling approach for 10 species. Qualitative (presence-absence) and quantitative (relative abundance) estimate f distributioso abundancd nan e provided consistent mea- sure f fiso s h specie 3 reachwide recover f th o speciet 0 2 a s1 r f yfo o e srepre 8 e scal ath d t an e- sentative-reach scale. Combining results across scales and estimator types showed that distributions and abundance f 1o 1 5 specie reace f so th hn i s affecte kile th l y werdb e simila thoso rt e observed in unaffected upstrea downstread man m reaches 8-11 months following the perturbation. Differ- ence distribution i s abundancd an n e betwee e affectenth d reac unaffected han d reaches indicate f tha1o 1 t full4 tspecie no yd recovereha s d durin same gth e time period; results were equivocal fo othe2 r r species attribute W . e difference recovern si y rates between thes groupo tw e difo t s - ferences in parental investment in offspring. Species exhibiting rapid recovery either engage in extensive spawning site preparatio r guarno e spawnindth g site followin g depositioeg g d nan fertilization; species that had not recovered in the year following the kill show limited spawning site preparation and do not guard the spawning site. Stream fisexposee har boto dt h - naturatemplatan d an l e determinin range gth liff eo e history traits thropogenic disturbances thaalten ca t r population founa strea n i dm fish assemblage (Res t ale h . distribution and abundance. We need to understand 1988). At a given site, local factors such as dis- the factors that influence population recovery fol- tance to source populations of potential colonists lowing disturbance orden si effectivelo rt y manag occurrencd an e f barriero e movemeno t s e imar t- stream fish resources (Cairns et al. 1971; Hughes portant (Cairns et al. 1971; Gore and Milner 1990; . 1990eal t ; Detenbec . 1992)al t e k . Factor - de Detenbecs . 1992)al t ke . Finally, life history traits termining recovery rates can be viewed in a hi- defining potential rates of population increase erarchical fashion (Detenbeck et al. 1992). Re- (e.g., Winemiller and Rose 1992) and vagility of gional variations in climate, geomorphology, and individuals should determine differential recovery hydrologic regime provide the large-scale habitat rates in a given assemblage. Most studie fisf so h population recovery follow- ———— ing large-scale natural or anthropogenic distur- 1 Present address: Department of Biological and Phys- bance come from second fourth-ordeo t - r streams ical Sciences, Kennesaw State University, 1000 Chastain that have fish assemblages thae well-adaptear t d Road, Kennesaw, Georgia 30144, USA. to periodic disturbance (Niemi et al. 1990; Schlos- 2 Present address: U.S. Forest Service, Center for Ser 1990; Detenbeck et al. 1992). Response vari- Aquatic Technology Transfer, Southern Research Sta- ables m frequently limited to either qualitative lion. Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0321, (presence_absence) or ^quantitative (relative Unie jointl3s Th i t y sponsore Biologicae th y db - abundanceRe l ) data fro ma limite d numbe f "repo r - sources Division of the U.S. Geological Survey, the Vir- resentative" sites (Niemi et al. 1990). Data on pop- ginia Departmen Gamf t o Inlan d ean d Fisheries, Virginia ulation densit d spatiayan l distribution durind gan Tech, and the Wildlife Management Institute. after recovery from a variety of regions and stream 895 896 ENSIG. AL T NE size needee sar develoo dt pcomprehensivea , pre- ginia. Predominant land use in the watershed is dictive theory of fish population recovery follow- agricultural, with the majority of the area in pas- in ga disturbance . Furthermore, additional infor- ture or woodland. The riparian zone is largely veg- matioutilite th sensitivitd n yan no f qualitativyo e etated, with willows Salix spp., American hack- and quantitative response variables across spatial berry Celtis occidentalis, and sycamore Platanus sampling scales (i.e., from both representative- occidentalis dominane th s a t woody riparian spe- reacd reacan h h wide approaches; Hankid an n cies. Total watershed area above a gauging station Reeves 1988; Dolloff et al. 1993) is needed to in the middle of the study reach (Figure 1) is 285 facilitate design and implementation of effective km2; mean daily flow for the period of record is recovery monitoring programs. Although manip- 3.14 nvVs, and stream gradient is 1.7 m/km. Hy- ulative studie providn ca s e insight into recoloni- drologic records indicate thae studth t y reach zation following small-scale defaunations (Meffe maintained continuou perioe s th flo r f recdwo fo - and Sheldon 1990; Peterse d Baylean n y 1993), ord (more than 40 years). Average stream width dat large-scalr afo e studie usualle sar y obtainey db is 16.7 m; average pool depth is 52 cm; and max- treating anthropogenic disturbance s experia s - imum pool depth is usually less than 1.5 m, al- ments (Spark . 1990)al t se . though some pools exceed 3 m. Although there are On 15 October 1991, a dairy farm in Riner, Vir- perennial streams entering South Fork Roanoke ginia, accidentally released 100,000 gallons of liq- upstrea downstread man m fro affectee mth d reach, uid manure into Elliott Creek. In all, 22 km of the only tributaries entering the affected reach are stream were affected, 13 km of Elliott Creek and smal intermittentd an l . 9 km of South Fork Roanoke River downstream For the reachwide component of the study, we of its confluence with Elliott Creek. The Virginia studR divideSF y e areth d a into three separate Water Control Board estimated that over 190,000 reaches, an upstream (US) control reach, a down- fish were killed. Qualitative streamside observa- stream (DS) control kila reac d l (KLhan ) reach. tion immediateld s 3 ove e rth y followin spile gth l The US reach included a 3-km stretch of SFR be- believo t lea s du e thae ichthyofaunth t s vir-wa a ginning near the mouth of Elliott Creek and ex- tually eliminate- af e th df o fro uppee m mth k 6 r tending upstream reacS D d he an begaTh .m k n9 fected reac Soutn ho h Fork Roanoke e terth - n I . downstreaendem k 3 1 d moute th f mf Ellioto ho t minolog f Bendey o . (1984 al t Gord e rd an ) ean Creek, and the KL reach included the 6 km of SFR Milner (1990) manure th , e classifieeb spiln ca l d immediately downstrea e moutth f f mEllioto ho t level-a s a 2 pulse disturbance, which indicates that Creek (Figure 1). Fish were collected from seven upstrea downstread man m source colonistf so - sex sites for the representative-reach portion of the isted followin spile thad causae gth an th lt l agent study downstreamo tw , upstreamo tw , thred an , e t altedidno r physical habitat availabl potentiao et l withi affectee nth d reach (Figur. 1) e recolonizers. Although the spill is regrettable, it We determined reachwide distributio abund nan - d providdi n opportunita e o refint y r underou e - danc f threeo e species, Roanoke logperch Percina standin factore th f go s that influence fish recolon- rex, Roanoke darte . roanoka,P r blacd an k jump- ization following perturbation. rock Scartomyzon (=Moxostoma) cervinus. Distri- We present the results of a 2-year study that butio abundancd nan species—whit0 e 1 dat r afo e assessed fish recolonizatio affectee th n ni d reach. shiner Luxilus albeolus, crescent shiner L. cerasi- The four major objectives of the study were (1) to nus, bluehead chub Nocomis leptocephalus, central determin e distributioth e d abundancnan - se f o e stoneroller Campostoma anomalum, torrent sucker lected riffle-dwelling fish species in the study Thobumia (—Moxoslonia) rhothoeca, black jump- reach during summer 199 asses1993d o t 2an ) (2 ,s rock, margined mad torn Noturus insignis, fan tail the utilit f reachwido y representative-reacd an e h darter Etheostoma flabellare, river weed darter £. approaches for determining recovery, (3) to assess podostemone, and Roanoke darter—were obtained e utilitth f qualitativo y e (presence-absenced an ) from the seven representative-reach sites. Juve- quantitative (relative abundance) measures for de- niles and adults of all 11 species are commonly termining asseso t recovery ) role f (4 th s eo d an , difference lifn i se history characteristic detern si - found in erosional, riffle-run habitat from the time mining recovery rates. they spaw latn ni e spring until water temperatures dro earln pi y winter, when they move into deep, Study Area and Study Species slow-moving pools (Matthews 1990; Jenkind an s South Fork Roanoke (SFR) is a fifth-order Burkhead 1994; Ensign 1995). They are all either streae Valleth Ridgd mn i yan e Provinc f Vireo - benthi water co r column insectivores- , ex wit e hth FISH RECOVERY AFTER DISTURBANCE 897 Roanoke River Elliott Creek FIGURE I.—The South Fork Roanoke River study area.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Information on the NCWRC's Scientific Council of Fishes Rare
    A Summary of the 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes in North Carolina Submitted by Bryn H. Tracy North Carolina Division of Water Resources North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Raleigh, NC On behalf of the NCWRC’s Scientific Council of Fishes November 01, 2014 Bigeye Jumprock, Scartomyzon (Moxostoma) ariommum, State Threatened Photograph by Noel Burkhead and Robert Jenkins, courtesy of the Virginia Division of Game and Inland Fisheries and the Southeastern Fishes Council (http://www.sefishescouncil.org/). Table of Contents Page Introduction......................................................................................................................................... 3 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes In North Carolina ........... 4 Summaries from the 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes in North Carolina .......................................................................................................................... 12 Recent Activities of NCWRC’s Scientific Council of Fishes .................................................. 13 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part I, Ohio Lamprey .............................................. 14 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part II, “Atlantic” Highfin Carpsucker ...................... 17 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part III, Tennessee Darter ...................................... 20 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Head Dams Facilitate Round Goby Neogobius Melanostomus Invasion
    Biol Invasions (2018) 20:757–776 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1573-3 ORIGINAL PAPER Low-head dams facilitate Round Goby Neogobius melanostomus invasion Dustin Raab . Nicholas E. Mandrak . Anthony Ricciardi Received: 9 July 2017 / Accepted: 23 September 2017 / Published online: 3 October 2017 Ó Springer International Publishing AG 2017 Abstract Round Goby Neogobius melanostomus inclusion of both reservoir-associated abiotic variables invasion of the Grand River (Ontario, Canada) and Round Goby abundance as model terms. To presents an opportunity to assess the role of abiotic determine establishment potential of the uninvaded gradients in mediating the establishment and impact of reach immediately upstream, four environmental nonnative benthic fishes in rivers. In this system, habitat characteristics were used in discriminant sequential low-head dams delineate uninvaded and function analysis (DFA) to predict three potential invaded river reaches and create upstream gradients of outcomes of introduction: non-invaded and either increasing water velocity. We hypothesized that flow lower or higher Round Goby abundance (low and high refugia created by impounded reservoirs above low- invasion status, respectively) than the median number head dams enhance local Round Goby abundance. of Round Goby at invaded sites. Our DFA function Round Goby influence on the native fish community correctly classified non-invaded and high-abundance was determined by variance partitioning, and we used invasion status sites [ 85% of the time, with lower generalized additive models to identify small-bodied (73%) success in classifying low-abundance invasion benthic fish species most likely to be impacted by status sites, and the spatial pattern of our results Round Goby invasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Basinwide Assessment Report Roanoke River Basin
    BASINWIDE ASSESSMENT REPORT ROANOKE RIVER BASIN NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Water Quality Environmental Sciences Section December 2010 This Page Left Intentionally Blank 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page LIST OF APPENDICES ...............................................................................................................................3 LIST OF TABLES.........................................................................................................................................3 LIST OF FIGURES.......................................................................................................................................4 INTRODUCTION TO PROGRAM METHODS..............................................................................................5 BASIN DESCRIPTION..................................................................................................................................6 ROA RIVER HUC 03010103—DAN RIVER HEADWATERS.......................................................................7 River and Stream Assessment .......................................................................................................7 ROA RIVER HUC 03010104—DAN RIVER……………………………………………………………………...9 River and Stream Assessment……………………………………………………………………….…..9 ROA RIVER HUC 03010102—JOHN H. KERR RESERVOIR………………………………………………..11 River and Stream Assessment………………………………………………………………………….11 ROA RIVER HUC 03010106—LAKE GASTON………………………………………………………………..13 River and Stream Assessment………………………………………………………………………….13
    [Show full text]
  • Using Genetic Tools to Understand the Population Ecology of Stream Fishes James Henry Roberts III Dissertation Submitted To
    Using genetic tools to understand the population ecology of stream fishes James Henry Roberts III Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Fish and Wildlife Conservation Paul L. Angermeier, Co-chairman Eric M. Hallerman, Co-chairman C. Andrew Dolloff J. Paul Grobler Marcella J. Kelly April 27th, 2012 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: darter, dispersal, endangered species, genetic diversity, landscape ecology, isolation- by-distance, metapopulation dynamics, persistence, population structure, stream fish Copyright 2012, James Roberts Using genetic tools to understand the population ecology of stream fishes James Henry Roberts III ABSTRACT Stream fishes are highly diverse, yet highly imperiled by human alterations of stream environments. Many species are poorly characterized with regard to the size and structure of populations and patterns of dispersal between populations, which complicates assessment of how human activities, both harmful and beneficial, will affect persistence. I used genetic tools to further this understanding in three case-study fish species of the southeastern United States: Roanoke logperch (Percina rex) of the greater Roanoke River basin and redline (Etheostoma rufilineatum) and greenside darters (E. blennioides) of the upper Tennessee River basin. I found that endangered P. rex persists in seven isolated populations. Within populations, individuals exhibit extensive dispersal and gene flow, which maintains connectivity throughout entire watersheds. Most populations exhibit small contemporary effective population sizes and occupy few stream channels, and thereby face an elevated risk of extinction. Genetic estimates of divergence indicate that fragmentation was recent, coincident with the construction of major dams throughout the species’ range.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Game and Inland Fisheries Meeting Agenda
    Revised Board of Game and Inland Fisheries 4000 West Broad Street, Board Room Richmond, Virginia 23230 August 14, 2012 9:00am Call to order and welcome, reading of the Mission Statement and Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 1. Recognition of Employees and Others 2. Public Comments – Department plan to build a new headquarters under PPEA 3. Public Comments – Non-Agenda Items 4. Approval of July 10, 2012 Board Meeting Minutes 5. Committee Meeting Reports: Wildlife, Boat and Law Enforcement Committee: Mr. Turner, Chairman of the Wildlife, Boat and Law Enforcement Committee, will report on the activities of the August 7, 2012 Committee Meeting. The Committee will recommend the following items to the full Board for final action: Staff Recommendations – Fisheries Regulation Amendments Staff Recommendations – Diversity Regulation Amendments Staff Recommendations – Boating Regulation Amendments Staff Recommendations – 2012-2013 Migratory Waterfowl Seasons and Bag Limits Staff Recommendations – ADA Regulation Agency Land Use Plan Proposed CY2013 Board Meeting Schedule Finance, Audit and Compliance Committee: Mr. Colgate, Chairman of the Finance, Audit and Compliance Committee, will report on the activities of the July 25, 2012 Committee Meeting. The Committee will present the following reports: FY2012 Year-end Financial Summary Internal Audit FY2013 Work Plan - Final Action Education, Planning and Outreach Committee: Ms. Caruso, Chairwoman of the Education, Planning, and Outreach Committee Meeting. Ms. Caruso will announce the next Committee Meeting will be held on October 17, 2012 beginning at 10:00am. 6. Closed Session 7. Director's Report: 8. Chairman's Remarks 9. Additional Business/Comments 10. Next Meeting Date: October 18, 2012 beginning at 9:00am 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater And
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • NRSA 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Appendices (Pdf)
    National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Version 1.1, April 2013 Appendix A: Equipment & Supplies Appendix Equipment A: & Supplies A-1 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Version 1.1, April 2013 pendix Equipment A: & Supplies Ap A-2 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Version 1.1, April 2013 Base Kit: A Base Kit will be provided to the field crews for all sampling sites that they will go to. Some items are sent in the base kit as extra supplies to be used as needed. Item Quantity Protocol Antibiotic Salve 1 Fish plug Centrifuge tube stand 1 Chlorophyll A Centrifuge tubes (screw-top, 50-mL) (extras) 5 Chlorophyll A Periphyton Clinometer 1 Physical Habitat CST Berger SAL 20 Automatic Level 1 Physical Habitat Delimiter – 12 cm2 area 1 Periphyton Densiometer - Convex spherical (modified with taped V) 1 Physical Habitat D-frame Kick Net (500 µm mesh, 52” handle) 1 Benthics Filteration flask (with silicone stopped and adapter) 1 Enterococci, Chlorophyll A, Periphyton Fish weigh scale(s) 1 Fish plug Fish Voucher supplies 1 pack Fish Voucher Foil squares (aluminum, 3x6”) 1 pack Chlorophyll A Periphyton Gloves (nitrile) 1 box General Graduated cylinder (25 mL) 1 Periphyton Graduated cylinder (250 mL) 1 Chlorophyll A, Periphyton HDPE bottle (1 L, white, wide-mouth) (extras) 12 Benthics, Fish Vouchers HDPE bottle (500 mL, white, wide-mouth) with graduations 1 Periphyton Laboratory pipette bulb 1 Fish Plug Microcentrifuge tubes containing glass beads
    [Show full text]
  • Population Viability Analysis for Endangered Roanoke Logperch
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Biology Faculty Publications Biology, Department of 6-4-2016 Population Viability Analysis for Endangered Roanoke Logperch James Henry Roberts Georgia Southern University, [email protected] Paul L. Angermeier U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] Gregory B. Anderson Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/biology-facpubs Part of the Biochemistry, Biophysics, and Structural Biology Commons, and the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Roberts, James Henry, Paul L. Angermeier, Gregory B. Anderson. 2016. "Population Viability Analysis for Endangered Roanoke Logperch." Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management, 7 (1): 46-64. doi: 10.3996/ 032015-JFWM-026 https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/biology-facpubs/127 This article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biology, Department of at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Articles Population Viability Analysis for Endangered Roanoke Logperch James H. Roberts,* Paul L. Angermeier, Gregory B. Anderson J.H. Roberts Department of Biology, Georgia Southern University, 4324 Old Register Road, Statesboro, Georgia 30458 P.L. Angermeier U.S. Geological Survey, Virginia Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 G.B. Anderson Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 Abstract A common strategy for recovering endangered species is ensuring that populations exceed the minimum viable population size (MVP), a demographic benchmark that theoretically ensures low long-term extinction risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambloplites Cavifrons)
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of Spring 2017 Assessing the Genetic Status and Factors Leading to the Decline of the Roanoke Bass (Ambloplites Cavifrons) Jackman C. Eschenroeder Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Eschenroeder, J.C. Assessing the genetic status and factors leading to the decline of the Roanoke bass (Ambloplites cavifrons). MS thesis. Georgia Southern University, 2017. This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ASSESSING THE GENETIC STATUS AND FACTORS LEADING TO THE DECLINE OF THE ROANOKE BASS (AMBLOPLITES CAVIFRONS) by JACKMAN ESCHENROEDER (Under the direction of James H. Roberts) ABSTRACT Although numerous factors have led to the staggering declines in freshwater biodiversity throughout the United States and the world, habitat alteration and introduced species pose some of the greatest challenges to conservation efforts. Learning more about how these two factors lead to the decline of an endemic organism could help prevent the future loss of unique species and the premature conclusion of evolutionary trajectories. Roanoke bass (Ambloplites cavifrons) is a sport fish endemic to portions of the Roanoke, Chowan, Tar, and Neuse river basins of North Carolina and Virginia. This species has been in decline for many years, and it is believed that their continued existence is threatened by competition, and potentially hybridization and introgression with their introduced relative, the rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris).
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Freshwater Fishes of the United States
    Threatened Freshwater Fishes of the United States ROBERT RUSH MILLER 1 Museum o] Zoology, The University o/ Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 ABSTRACT Threatened, native freshwater fishes are listed for 49 of the 50 U.S. States, the first such compilation. Over 300 kinds are included in a formal classification, cross-indexedto states (Table 1), followed by statelists and the statusof each fish, whether rare, endangered,depleted, or undetermined. The concern for native fishes and the important factors responsible for threats to their existence are briefly outlined. Although the lists vary from those based on extensive recent state surveys to others in which current information is sparse, publication is expected to enhance the chances for survival through protective legislation (already enacted by a number of states) and stronger concern for such natural resources. INTRODUCTION committeesduring the period that the infor- It is only within the past decade,princi- mation presentedbelow was being prepared. pally since 1963, that seriousthreats to the Since the late 1960's, particularly in the survivalof many of our uniquenative fishes West but also. in the East, states have been have becomewidely recognized.Committees enactinglegislation and enforcingprotection concernedwith vanishingU.S. wildlife have of endangeredspecies and subspeciesas well been established within scientific societies as as maintainingnatural habitatsand creating well as by the statesand the federal govern- refugia for some of the more critically ment. On a globalbasis, action has been taken threatenedfishes (see, for example,Miller and by the SurvivalService Commission of the In- Pister, 1971). This type of effort must be ternational Union for Conservation of Nature extendedinto every state.
    [Show full text]
  • First Observation of a Natural Hybrid Between Endangered Roanoke Logperch (Percina Rex) and Chainback Darter (Percina Navisense)
    Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings Volume 1 Number 53 Number 53 (December 2011) Article 5 12-1-2011 First Observation of a Natural Hybrid Between Endangered Roanoke Logperch (Percina rex) and Chainback Darter (Percina navisense) James H. Roberts Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/sfcproceedings Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Roberts, James H. (2011) "First Observation of a Natural Hybrid Between Endangered Roanoke Logperch (Percina rex) and Chainback Darter (Percina navisense)," Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings: No. 53. Available at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/sfcproceedings/vol1/iss53/5 This Original Research Article is brought to you for free and open access by Volunteer, Open Access, Library Journals (VOL Journals), published in partnership with The University of Tennessee (UT) University Libraries. This article has been accepted for inclusion in Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings by an authorized editor. For more information, please visit https://trace.tennessee.edu/sfcproceedings. First Observation of a Natural Hybrid Between Endangered Roanoke Logperch (Percina rex) and Chainback Darter (Percina navisense) This original research article is available in Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings: https://trace.tennessee.edu/ sfcproceedings/vol1/iss53/5 SFC PROCEEDINGS No. 53 First Observation of a Natural Hybrid Between Endangered Roanoke Logperch ( Percina rex ) and Chainback Darter ( Percina nevisense ) JAMES H. ROBERTS Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA 24061; Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT analysis and both specimen and fin were preserved in 95% ethanol. I used meristic, mitochondrial DNA, and nuclear DNA The only Percina species known to occur in the methods to infer the most likely ancestry of a putative Roanoke drainage (Jenkins and Burkhead, 1994) are hybrid specimen of Percina captured in the Roanoke River Roanoke Logperch, Percina rex (Jordan and Evermann); of Virginia.
    [Show full text]