DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Botany

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Botany ProjectProject BotanyBotany ExploringExploringExploring Native NativeNative Plants PlantsPlants of theofof the UnitedUnitedUnited States States An EcoregionalAnAn Ecoregional Curriculum Curriculum Curriculumby the by the by the Project Botany: Exploring the Native Plants of the United States An Ecoregional Curriculum Contributors: Jennie Cramer, Jody Einerson, Larkin Guenther, Carolyn Menke, Ian Silvernail, and Sarah Stevens Illustrations: Amanda Devine Barbara Gleason Ella Samuel Jody Einerson Larkin Guenther Front Cover Illustration: Ella Samuel Back Cover Illustration: Larkin Guenther Content Editor: Jill Bushakra Graphic Design: Adam Payson Jessica Brothers Institute for Applied Ecology 563 SW Jefferson Ave. Corvallis, OR 541-753-3099 [email protected] Acknowledgements We would like to thank the following people for their contribution in producing Project Botany: Special thanks to the following for their vision and continued support in producing and expanding this curriculum: Peggy Olwell—Bureau of Land Management, Plant Conservation Lead, BLM National Program Joan Seevers—Bureau of Land Management, Plant Conservation Lead, Oregon/Washington Nancy Sawtelle—Bureau of Land Management, Plant Ecologist, Eugene District, Oregon Thank you to the USDA Bureau of Land Management for providing funding and support for the creation of this curriculum. Special thanks to the Earth Partnership for Schools Program for acting as a model in developing place-based curriculum. University of Wisconsin-Madison Arboretum, 1207 Seminole Highway, Madison, WI 53711. https://arboretum.wisc.edu/ Advisors Teresa Matteson, Benton Soil and Water Dio Morales, Curriculum Design Consultant Conservation District Andy Moldenke, OSU Botany and Plant Pathology Heath Keirstead, Benton Soil and Water Melissa Kirkland, USFS Botanist Conservation District Jenny Lippert, US Foresty Service Botanist Maggie Livesay, OSU Extension Faculty; 4-H Youth Development Holly LeMasurier, Middle Fork Willamette Watershed Council Jeff Mitchell, Philomath High School Tim Whitley, Rachel Carson High School Paul Bradley, Wilson Elementary School Loren Gerig, Woodburn High School Dan Bregar, Crescent Valley High School Elly Veyera, Wy’east Middle School Holly McRae, Willamette Resources and Education Network Mary Ann Schmidt, Oregon Trout Healthy Waters Institute Sujaya Rao, Oregon State University Faculty Rural Science Education Jennifer Martin, Owyhee Watershed Council Kendra Mingo, Willamette University Botanist Jon Souder, Coos Watershed Association Brad Withrow-Bobinson, OSU Extension Faculty Forestry Piloting Teachers April Fong, Linda Wolf, Sean Kenna, Loren Gerig, Edith Moore, Kevin Celtura, Tim Whitley, Jonathan Pope, Michelle Barray, Lacy Meahm, Brian Wach, Jeff Mitchell ii Content Reviewers and Content Experts Tom Kaye, Institute of Applied Ecology Director, Marty Stein, Siuslaw National Forest Botanist OSU Botany and Plant Pathology Susan Fritts, BLM Medford District Botanist Carolyn Menke, IAE, Plant Conservation Biologist Douglas Kendig, BLM Medford District Botanist Rob Fiegener, IAE, Native Seed Network Teresa Matteson, Benton Soil & Water Conservation Melanie Gisler, IAE, Restoration Ecologist District Matt Blakely-Smith, IAE, Restoration Biologist Kathy Pendergrass, Natural Resources Conservation Service Plant Material Specialist Amanda Stanley, IAE, Ecology Marcia Wineteer, BLM Medford District Botanist Stacy Moore, IAE, Ecological Education Director Robert Kentta, Cultural Resources Director, Berta Youtie, Eastern Oregon Stewardship Services Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians Tim Rodenkirk, BLM Coos Bay Botanist Wenix Red Elk, Public Outreach and Education Coordinator, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Laura Potash Marin, Mt. Baker Snoqualmie National Indian Reservation Forest Botanist Misty Thorsgard, Cultural Resources, Confederated Kristi Mergenthaler, Siskiyou Field Institute, Botanist Tribes of the Grand Ronde Gene Yates, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest Mary Van Brocklin, Falconproof Botanist Reid Schuller, Botanist Katie Grenier, Deschutes/Ochoco National Forest Botanist We would also like to thank: Project Budburst for partnering on the lesson, “Phenology: Tracking the Seasons in Your World.” The Commission for Environmental Cooperation, for the use of maps and resources relating to and defining the ecoregions of North America. About the Institute for Applied Ecology Founded in 1999, the Institute for Applied Ecology (IAE) is a non-profit organization established to provide a service to public and private agencies and individuals by developing and communicating information on ecosystems and effective management strategies. IAE offers habitat restoration services complete with management plans, site preparation, maintenance, and monitoring. Our Native Seed Network connects buyers and sellers of native seed while our Conservation Research program conducts native ecosystem research and monitoring and provides surveys for rare plants. The Ecological Education Program provides learning opportunities for all ages through place-based education and service-learning projects. For additional copies of the curriculum contact: Institute for Applied Ecology 563 SW Jefferson Ave. Corvallis, OR 97330 www.appliedeco.org [email protected] iii Project Botany: Exploring the Native Plants of the United States Table of Contents Introduction 1 Making it Place-Based ................................................................................viii 1. For Teachers ...............................................................................ix 2. Writing a Curriculum for Your Region ........................................................xi Introduction 2 1. What Is a Plant? ............................................................................... 2 2. Explore the Ecoregions of the United States ....................................................12 3. Field Journaling: Observations From a Special Spot .............................................23 Section 1: Plant Identification 4. What’s in a Name? ...........................................................................27 5. Botanical Terms Challenge . .33 6. The Secret Life of Flowers ....................................................................43 7. Plants Have Families, Too .....................................................................52 8. Botany Bouquet .............................................................................58 9. Drupes, Pomes, and Loculicidal Capsules: A Botanist’s Lingo for Describing Native Fruits ...........62 10. Make Your Own Plant Collection . .67 11. Plant Adaptations: Create-A-Plant .............................................................73 12. Mechanics of a Key ...........................................................................83 13. Make a Field Guide for Your School ...........................................................89 Section 2: The Ecoregions of the United States 14. The Place I Call Home .........................................................................94 Section 3: The Ecology of Native Plants 15. Ecosystem Comparisons .....................................................................100 16. Leaf to Landscape: Ecological Scale . 109 17. Survival Quest: A Pollination Game . 113 18. What’s Going Down Underground? ..........................................................122 19. Plant Wars: A Tale of Offense and Defense ....................................................130 Section 4: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Native and Non-native Plants 20. Nurture a Native Garden Project part A ......................................................137 Nurture a Native Garden Project part B . 142 Nurture a Native Garden Project part C ......................................................149 iv 21. Weed Explosion ............................................................................156 22 Measuring and Monitoring Plant Populations ..................................................164 Section 5: Ethnobotany 23. Who Walked Here Before You ...............................................................172 24. Burden Basket: Plants as Fiber ................................................................180 25. Plants As Medicine ..........................................................................189 Section 6: Climate Change and Phenology 26. Phenology: Tracking the Seasons in Your World ................................................197 27. Plant Migration Game: A Race Between Plants and Climate Change .............................204 Section 7: The Future of Native Plants 28. Nobody Right, Nobody Wrong: A Role-Playing Game. .214 29. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services ..........................................................226 30. Saving Botanical Treasures: Threatened and Endangered Plants .................................233 31. Design a Habitat Restoration Plan. 244 References .........................................................................................255 Glossary ..........................................................................................258 Appendices A ppendix I:Field Guide Recommendations for Your Ecoregion .................................269 Appendix II: Ethnobotany Resources .........................................................273 Appendix III: Ecoregions of the United States .................................................274 Appendix VI: Make Your Own Quadrat Frame ................................................281 v Introduction Getting Started
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History Department Botany
    THE HISTORY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY 1889-1989 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA SHERI L. BARTLETT I - ._-------------------- THE HISTORY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY 1889-1989 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA SHERI L. BARTLETT TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface 1-11 Chapter One: 1889-1916 1-18 Chapter Two: 1917-1935 19-38 Chapter Three: 1936-1954 39-58 Chapter Four: 1955-1973 59-75 Epilogue 76-82 Appendix 83-92 Bibliography 93-94 -------------------------------------- Preface (formerly the College of Science, Literature and the Arts), the College of Agriculture, or The history that follows is the result some other area. Eventually these questions of months ofresearch into the lives and work were resolved in 1965 when the Department of the Botany Department's faculty members joined the newly established College of and administrators. The one-hundred year Biological Sciences (CBS). In 1988, The overview focuses on the Department as a Department of Botany was renamed the whole, and the decisions that Department Department of Plant Biology, and Irwin leaders made to move the field of botany at Rubenstein from the Department of Genetics the University of Minnesota forward in a and Cell Biology became Plant Biology's dynamic and purposeful manner. However, new head. The Department now has this is not an effort to prove that the administrative ties to both the College of Department's history was linear, moving Biological Sciences and the College of forward in a pre-determined, organized Agriculture. fashion at every moment. Rather I have I have tried to recognize the attempted to demonstrate the complexities of accomplishments and individuality of the the personalities and situations that shaped Botany Department's faculty while striving to the growth ofthe Department and made it the describe the Department as one entity.
    [Show full text]
  • California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP
    CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 [email protected] in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California
    [Show full text]
  • Floral Symmetry Affects Speciation Rates in Angiosperms Risa D
    Received 25 July 2003 Accepted 13 November 2003 Published online 16 February 2004 Floral symmetry affects speciation rates in angiosperms Risa D. Sargent Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada ([email protected]) Despite much recent activity in the field of pollination biology, the extent to which animal pollinators drive the formation of new angiosperm species remains unresolved. One problem has been identifying floral adaptations that promote reproductive isolation. The evolution of a bilaterally symmetrical corolla restricts the direction of approach and movement of pollinators on and between flowers. Restricting pollin- ators to approaching a flower from a single direction facilitates specific placement of pollen on the pollin- ator. When coupled with pollinator constancy, precise pollen placement can increase the probability that pollen grains reach a compatible stigma. This has the potential to generate reproductive isolation between species, because mutations that cause changes in the placement of pollen on the pollinator may decrease gene flow between incipient species. I predict that animal-pollinated lineages that possess bilaterally sym- metrical flowers should have higher speciation rates than lineages possessing radially symmetrical flowers. Using sister-group comparisons I demonstrate that bilaterally symmetric lineages tend to be more species rich than their radially symmetrical sister lineages. This study supports an important role for pollinator- mediated speciation and demonstrates that floral morphology plays a key role in angiosperm speciation. Keywords: reproductive isolation; pollination; sister group comparison; zygomorphy 1. INTRODUCTION The importance of pollinator-mediated selection in angiosperms is well supported by theory (Kiester et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Salix Production for the Floral Industry in the USA Who Grow Willows
    Salix production for the floral industry in the USA Who grow willows • Plant nurseries (ornamental and erosion control) • Biomass growers • Basket makers • Floral cut-stem production The USDA Specialty Crop Initiative • the production of woody ornamental cut stems, representing a specialty niche in cut flower production, has risen in popularity • dogwood (Cornus), Forsythia, Hydrangea, lilac (Syringa), and Viburnum • potential as an off-season production option, or third crop enterprise Objectives • to characterize the extent of Salix cultivation as a floral crop in the USA by identifying the active willow growers and their profiles, production acreage and gross sales • to identify if the production practices are well defined and consistent to support crop expansion • the potential the crop’s expansion Distribution and concentration of Salix survey recipients in the United States 52 growers The Association of Specialty Cut Flower Growers (ASCFG) Grower profile • Small scale specialty cut flower producers (58.6%) • Large scale specialty cut flower producers (24.1%) • 24.1% considered Salix as “major crop” –Total gross sales for 80.0% was less than $25,000; 17.0% grossed $25,000- 50,000 and 3% grossed $50,000- 100,000 • good cash return, up to $1.25 to $1.75 per stem of common pussy willow • annual gross financial returns for willow plants, up to $24.94, is much higher than for many other woody florals Taxa in cultivation • For catkins •For Stems The seasonality of the crop Willow harvest for ornamental value by number of growers reporting
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Classification, Evolution and Reproduction
    Plant Classification, Evolution, and Reproduction Plant classification, evolution and reproduction! Traditional plant classification! ! A phylogenetic perspective on classification! ! Milestones of land plant evolution! ! Overview of land plant diversity! ! Life cycle of land plants! Classification “the ordering of diversity into a meaningful hierarchical pattern” (i.e., grouping)! The Taxonomic Hierarchy! Classification of Ayahuasca, Banisteriopsis caapi! Kingdom !Plantae! Phylum !Magnoliophyta Class ! !Magnoliopsida! Order !Malpighiales! Family !Malpighiaceae Genus ! !Banisteriopsis! Species !caapi! Ranks above genus have standard endings.! Higher categories are more inclusive.! Botanical nomenclature Carolus Linnaeus (1707–1778)! Species Plantarum! published 1753! 7,300 species! Botanical nomenclature Polynomials versus binomials! Know the organism “The Molesting Salvinia” Salvinia auriculata (S. molesta)! hp://dnr.state.il.us/stewardship/cd/biocontrol/2floangfern.html " Taxonomy vs. classification! Assigning a name! A system ! ! ! Placement in a category! Often predictive ! because it is based on Replicable, reliable relationships! results! ! Relationships centered on genealogy ! ! ! ! Edward Hitchcock, Elementary Geology, 1940! Classification Phylogeny: Reflect hypothesized evolution. relationships! Charles Darwin, Origin of Species, 1859! Ernst Haeckel, Generelle Morphologie der Organismen, 1866! Branching tree-like diagrams representing relationships! Magnolia 1me 2 Zi m merman (1930) Lineage branching (cladogenesis or speciation) Modified
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Seed Plants
    Chapter 26 | Seed Plants 751 26.4 | The Role of Seed Plants By the end of this section, you will be able to do the following: • Explain how angiosperm diversity is due, in part, to multiple complex interactions with animals • Describe ways in which pollination occurs • Discuss the roles that plants play in ecosystems and how deforestation threatens plant biodiversity Without seed plants, life as we know it would not be possible. Plants play a key role in the maintenance of terrestrial ecosystems through the stabilization of soils, cycling of carbon, and climate moderation. Large tropical forests release oxygen and act as carbon dioxide “sinks.” Seed plants provide shelter to many life forms, as well as food for herbivores, thereby indirectly feeding carnivores. Plant secondary metabolites are used for medicinal purposes and industrial production. Virtually all animal life is dependent on plants for survival. Animals and Plants: Herbivory Coevolution of flowering plants and insects is a hypothesis that has received much attention and support, especially because both angiosperms and insects diversified at about the same time in the middle Mesozoic. Many authors have attributed the diversity of plants and insects to both pollination and herbivory, or the consumption of plants by insects and other animals. Herbivory is believed to have been as much a driving force as pollination. Coevolution of herbivores and plant defenses is easily and commonly observed in nature. Unlike animals, most plants cannot outrun predators or use mimicry to hide from hungry animals (although mimicry has been used to entice pollinators). A sort of arms race exists between plants and herbivores.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 9 BIOL 325 – Plant Systematics Name
    BIOL 325 – Plant Systematics Name: ___________________________ Sample Topics & Questions for Exam 1 This document and questions are the copyright of CRHardy, 2016 onwards. Topic 01 – Introduction, Sample Topics & Questions: 1. What major topics to Rhoads and Block (2007) discuss in the introduction to their book? 2. What are the reasons that Prather et al. (2004) list for continued herbarium collecting even in places like North America the flora is thought to be well known? 3. What method(s) does Dirig (2005) discuss for mounting pressed specimens to herbarium sheets? 4. What methods does Dirig (2005) discuss for collecting plant specimens for later pressing? 5. What do the graphs used by Prather et al. (2004) show about herbarium plant collecting in the US? 6. How does one define plant systematics? Name at least one synonym for plant systematics? 7. What are practitioners of plant systematics called and what are some of their important products? 8. Be able to explain how each of these products are important to people and other scientists outside the field of systematics. 9. What is a phylogeny? 10. What is a herbarium? 11. Name the important components of a herbarium specimen. 12. What are herbarium specimens used for? 13. Although taxonomy and systematics are often treated as synonyms by many, they are not actually the same thing. Which of the two is a broader term and how so? 14. The far majority of plant species are described from studies in ... a. botanical gardens b. herbaria c. the field d. plant nurseries e. zoological museums Page 1 of 9 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Perennial Polyculture Farming: Seeds of Another Agricultural Revolution?
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as a public CHILD POLICY service of the RAND Corporation. CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION Jump down to document ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING organization providing objective analysis and effective PUBLIC SAFETY solutions that address the challenges facing the public SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY and private sectors around the world. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Pardee Center View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. This product is part of the RAND Corporation occasional paper series. RAND occasional papers may include an informed perspective on a timely policy issue, a discussion of new research methodologies, essays, a paper presented at a conference, a conference summary, or a summary of work in progress. All RAND occasional papers undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity. Perennial Polyculture Farming Seeds of Another Agricultural Revolution? James A. Dewar This research was undertaken as a piece of speculation in the RAND Frederick S.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Habitat Quality for Conservation Using an Integrated
    Journal of Applied Ecology 2009, 46, 600–609 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01634.x AssessingBlackwell Publishing Ltd habitat quality for conservation using an integrated occurrence-mortality model Alessandra Falcucci1*, Paolo Ciucci1, Luigi Maiorano1, Leonardo Gentile2 and Luigi Boitani1 1Department of Animal and Human Biology, Sapienza Università di Roma, Viale dell’Università 32, 00185 Rome, Italy and 2Servizio Veterinario, Ente Parco Nazionale d’Abruzzo Lazio e Molise, Viale S. Lucia, 67032 Pescasseroli (l’Aquila), Italy Summary 1. Habitat suitability models are usually produced using species presence or habitat selection, with- out taking into account the demographic performance of the population considered. These models cannot distinguish between sink and source habitats, causing problems especially for species with low reproductive rates and high susceptibility to low levels of mortality as in the case of the critically endangered Apennine brown bear Ursus arctos marsicanus. 2. We developed a spatial model based on bear presence (2544 locations) and mortality data (37 locations) used as proxies for demographic performance. We integrated an occurrence and a mortality-risk Ecological Niche Factor Analysis model into a final two-dimensional model that can be used to distinguish between attractive sink-like and source-like habitat. 3. Our integrated model indicates that a traditional habitat suitability model can provide misleading management and conservation indications, as 43% of the area suitable for the occurrence model is associated with high mortality risk. Areas of source-like habitat for the Apennine bears (highly elevated areas rich in beech forests, far from roads, and with low human density and cultivated fields) are still present, including outside the currently occupied range.
    [Show full text]
  • IP Athos Renewable Energy Project, Plan of Development, Appendix D.2
    APPENDIX D.2 Plant Survey Memorandum Athos Memo Report To: Aspen Environmental Group From: Lehong Chow, Ironwood Consulting, Inc. Date: April 3, 2019 Re: Athos Supplemental Spring 2019 Botanical Surveys This memo report presents the methods and results for supplemental botanical surveys conducted for the Athos Solar Energy Project in March 2019 and supplements the Biological Resources Technical Report (BRTR; Ironwood 2019) which reported on field surveys conducted in 2018. BACKGROUND Botanical surveys were previously conducted in the spring and fall of 2018 for the entirety of the project site for the Athos Solar Energy Project (Athos). However, due to insufficient rain, many plant species did not germinate for proper identification during 2018 spring surveys. Fall surveys in 2018 were conducted only on a reconnaissance-level due to low levels of rain. Regional winter rainfall from the two nearest weather stations showed rainfall averaging at 0.1 inches during botanical surveys conducted in 2018 (Ironwood, 2019). In addition, gen-tie alignments have changed slightly and alternatives, access roads and spur roads have been added. PURPOSE The purpose of this survey was to survey all new additions and re-survey areas of interest including public lands (limited to portions of the gen-tie segments), parcels supporting native vegetation and habitat, and windblown sandy areas where sensitive plant species may occur. The private land parcels in current or former agricultural use were not surveyed (parcel groups A, B, C, E, and part of G). METHODS Survey Areas: The area surveyed for biological resources included the entirety of gen-tie routes (including alternates), spur roads, access roads on public land, parcels supporting native vegetation (parcel groups D and F), and areas covered by windblown sand where sensitive species may occur (portion of parcel group G).
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae
    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOTANY 0 NCTMBER 52 Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae Harold Robinson, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, andJames F. Weedin SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS City of Washington 1981 ABSTRACT Robinson, Harold, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, and James F. Weedin. Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae. Smithsonian Contri- butions to Botany, number 52, 28 pages, 3 tables, 1981.-Chromosome reports are provided for 145 populations, including first reports for 33 species and three genera, Garcilassa, Riencourtia, and Helianthopsis. Chromosome numbers are arranged according to Robinson’s recently broadened concept of the Heliantheae, with citations for 212 of the ca. 265 genera and 32 of the 35 subtribes. Diverse elements, including the Ambrosieae, typical Heliantheae, most Helenieae, the Tegeteae, and genera such as Arnica from the Senecioneae, are seen to share a specialized cytological history involving polyploid ancestry. The authors disagree with one another regarding the point at which such polyploidy occurred and on whether subtribes lacking higher numbers, such as the Galinsoginae, share the polyploid ancestry. Numerous examples of aneuploid decrease, secondary polyploidy, and some secondary aneuploid decreases are cited. The Marshalliinae are considered remote from other subtribes and close to the Inuleae. Evidence from related tribes favors an ultimate base of X = 10 for the Heliantheae and at least the subfamily As teroideae. OFFICIALPUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution’s annual report, Smithsonian Year. SERIESCOVER DESIGN: Leaf clearing from the katsura tree Cercidiphyllumjaponicum Siebold and Zuccarini. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: Chromosome numbers in Compositae, XII.
    [Show full text]
  • FOH Newsletter 2012
    FRIENDS Of The University Of Montana HERBARIUM Spring 2012 ....Bruce McCune MORE THAN VASCULAR AT MONTU By Andrea Pipp While perusing the vascular plant, moss, and lichen were the ecological relatives of mosses and incorporated specimens at MONTU you might see the name of Bruce them into his work. He relied on Mason Hale’s first edi- McCune. During his years at UM (1971-1979) Bruce con- tion of How to Know the Lichens and a long paper with tributed mounts of 62 vascular plant species and a larger keys titled “Lichens of the State of Washington” by Grace number of moss and lichen vouchers to the herbarium. Howard. He soon realized Hale’s book was very biased Bruce came to Missoula from the Midwest. Having toward eastern species, for even the most conspicuous grown up in Cincinnati and after completing his freshman lichens found on Mt. Sentinel weren’t in the book. Later year at Lawrence University in Appleton, Wisconsin, he discovered that Howard’s key contained as much mis- Bruce attended a wilderness botany class in northern Min- (Continued on page 7) nesota. There in the moss-carpeted forests he became quite interested in mosses and, in his words, was swept away by a remarkable young lady (Patricia Muir). Eager to escape the industrial winter of Appleton, Bruce fol- lowed Patricia to the University of Montana. That was 1971. The ‘new’ library was under construction, Hitch- cock and Cronquist, as a book, did not exist, and Botany stood on its own – a vibrant, active department, firmly ensconced in its own building.
    [Show full text]