DOCSLIB.ORG

FOH Newsletter 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FOH Newsletter 2012 FRIENDS Of The University Of Montana HERBARIUM Spring 2012 ....Bruce McCune MORE THAN VASCULAR AT MONTU By Andrea Pipp While perusing the vascular plant, moss, and lichen were the ecological relatives of mosses and incorporated specimens at MONTU you might see the name of Bruce them into his work. He relied on Mason Hale’s first edi- McCune. During his years at UM (1971-1979) Bruce con- tion of How to Know the Lichens and a long paper with tributed mounts of 62 vascular plant species and a larger keys titled “Lichens of the State of Washington” by Grace number of moss and lichen vouchers to the herbarium. Howard. He soon realized Hale’s book was very biased Bruce came to Missoula from the Midwest. Having toward eastern species, for even the most conspicuous grown up in Cincinnati and after completing his freshman lichens found on Mt. Sentinel weren’t in the book. Later year at Lawrence University in Appleton, Wisconsin, he discovered that Howard’s key contained as much mis- Bruce attended a wilderness botany class in northern Min- (Continued on page 7) nesota. There in the moss-carpeted forests he became quite interested in mosses and, in his words, was swept away by a remarkable young lady (Patricia Muir). Eager to escape the industrial winter of Appleton, Bruce fol- lowed Patricia to the University of Montana. That was 1971. The ‘new’ library was under construction, Hitch- cock and Cronquist, as a book, did not exist, and Botany stood on its own – a vibrant, active department, firmly ensconced in its own building. His advisor was Dr. Sherm Preece who provided Bruce with straightforward, simple advice...take the classes required for a botany major. Pe- riod. Goodbye. During his undergraduate years of 1971-1974, he and Pat explored Missoula and spent a lot of time on Univer- sity Mountain, now known as Mount Sentinel. Bruce was fascinated by Mount Sentinel – especially by the commu- nities of lichens and mosses growing on the north slope. He was intrigued that his botany professors could not name the species and didn’t seem to know much about them. He and Pat often escaped the dorms by taking their sleeping bags up the trail that runs between the north and west slopes, finding a level spot, and laying down for the night. They spent many hours in the spring botanizing on the west slope amidst the amazing display of wildflowers, mainly relying on keys in the Flora of Alberta by E. H. Moss. In his senior year Bruce took research credits to conduct a study on the succession of mosses on the north slope of Mt. Sentinel. It was then that Bruce realized that lichens Bruce McCune collecting lichen specimens in Seattle in 2009. Friends Notes from the Board of the University The herbarium at the University of Montana is well known for its of Montana collection of 140,000 vascular plants that highlight the Northern Rocky Mountain flora. But are you aware that the herbarium has collections Herbarium of the “other” Northern Rocky Mountain flora? You might ask “What other flora could there possibly be?” and I would answer, “Lichens, mosses, liverworts, algae, and diatoms (see page 2 for an article about Division of the diatom collection), of course.” What really comes to my mind is that Montana has five collection centers for non-vascular species: The Biological Sciences University of Montana herbarium (MONTU), Montana State Univer- University of sity herbarium (MONT), University of Montana at Great Falls (Won Montana Shic Hong’s liverwort collection), Yellowstone National Park, and Missoula, MT 59812 Glacier National Park. However, only the first two herbaria are really active and accessible to the public. The Mission of the At MONTU you’ll find about 6,400 lichen, moss, and liverwort Friends is to secure packets housed in cabinets located in the room immediately left of the support for and to main herbarium entrance. The moss and lichen collections are a reflec- enrich the tion of more than 100 years of botanical exploration, of the botanists collections and who traversed through our state, and of the diversity of species found in Montana and the greater Pacific Northwest (PNW). In a somewhat operations of chronological listing, the contributing botanists include R.S. Williams, The UM Herbarium LeRoy Harvey, Fred Herman, Roger Anderson, Wilf Schofield, Dave ————————————————————— Bilderback, Roger Rosentreter, Ann Debolt, Bruce McCune, Dale Vitt, Board of Directors and Joe Elliott. To our collection Peter Stickney has recently donated his non-vascular collection from the MRC herbarium. And what a Drake Barton wonderful collection it is! While many of the names reflect an earlier time, the quality of the specimens, their display within the packet, and Matt Lavin the fine detail to site and habitat information make these contributions Dean Pearson invaluable. Peter also donated his lichens mounted on herbarium Andrea Pipp sheets! While these mounts don’t reflect the standards for preserving Scott Mincemoyer, president non-vascular species they will serve as a nice teaching aid! From time David Dyer, ex officio to time our collection gets visited by lichenologists and bryologists and specimens get spot-checked. A more concerted effort to review speci- The Friends Newsletter mens and update their taxonomic names would do a lot to increase Edited by their value and use. Peter Lesica and David Dyer I’ll close this column with a little update on the other important cen- ter for non-vascular species, the herbarium at Montana State Univer- Layout & Copy Editing by sity. The MONT cabinets include about 8,500 lichen and 1,500 bryo- phyte packets, dating from the late 1800s to the present. The majority Drake Barton and Kathy Lloyd of specimens have been collected by R.S. Williams, A.J. Sharp, and Sharon Eversman. In the Spring 2011 newsletter, Matt Lavin wrote of the Consortium for Pacific Northwest Herbaria Online Portal. This is a project in which herbaria in the PNW are centralizing the data from their collections by digitizing labels and photographing specimens with very high resolution. This movement is growing to include lichens! Headed up by Tom Nash, the MONT lichen collections will be digi- tized and reviewed beginning in Fall 2012. I’m confident that the movement will continue to grow, eventually including the MONTU lichens. On your next trip to the herbarium my suggestion is this...stroll over to the lichen and bryophyte cabinets. Take a gander at the collections, check out the diversity of species represented, and marvel at the time when people hand-wrote their labels with beautiful penmanship. Andrea Pipp Moss specimens at MONTU are enclosed in a paper packet and labeled, as this one from Bruce McCune. See page 8 for a look at the moss. Photo: E. Graslie Page 2 MONTU NEWS BRIEFS Activities The Clark Fork Chapter of the Montana Native Plant So- New Acquisitions Peter Lesica: 248 specimens from Montana. ciety held three meetings in the herbarium during the win- David Hanna: 72 specimens from Montana. ter of 2011. In January, Peter Stickney told us about Mon- Roger Rosentreter: 64 lichens from western U.S. and Canada. tana’s Honeysuckle Family. Scott Mincemoyer came over J.B. Phipps, University of Western Ontario: 108 specimens of from Helena and provided a primer on Montana’s asters Crataegus, from MT, WY, and western Canada. in February. In March, Peter Lesica provided tips for Loren Bahls: Boxes 35 – 40 of the Montana Diatom Collection, learning the common plant families. consisting of 600 slides of diatoms. Neil Snow, MNHP: 73 specimens from Lewis & Clark Co, MT. MONTU hosted a group of researchers and students from the University of Washington and University of Michigan Exchange Acquisitions for 2 days while they sampled specimens for phytoliths. University of Washington: 232 specimens from Montana. The research was funded by a large grant titled “A com- University of Wyoming, Rocky Mountain Herbarium: 488 bined phytolith-isotope geochemistry approach to Ceno- specimens from Montana. zoic paleo-vegetation reconstruction in Montana.” Boise State University, Snake River Plains Herbarium: 29 speci- mens from Idaho. Loans for Research University of Washington, Peter Zika: 24 sheets of Juncus for Thanks to new members of his continuing research on this genus in western North America. the Friends! University of Alaska – Fairbanks, David Murray: 10 sheets of Eritrichium nanum for Flora of North America treatment. Your continued interest and support is what makes us effective. Thanks, and welcome to these members, new since the last newsletter. Examples of Information Requests West Virginia Natural Heritage Program: needed locality data Lowell Anderson, Helena for Artemisia and Silene, for climate change vulnerability study. Ann Fleischli, Missoula Atkins, Helena: information on Wyoming lichen specimens at Bruce McCune, Corvallis, OR MONTU. University of Georgia graduate student: localities for field col- lections of Amaranthus. Western Illinois University: records of Opuntia in Montana. Don’t Forget to Pay Your Dues! If you haven’t already done so, send in your mem- Visitors to the bership renewal. You won’t want to miss a single University of Montana issue of the newsletter or miss out on what is hap- pening at the herbarium. Use the membership re- Herbarium in 2011 newal insert included in this newsletter, or the General Public and Private Consultants membership form on page 12. Gift memberships Larry Widener, Tempe Regan, Cedar Brant, Drake Barton, are also available and are a great idea for friends Kathy Lloyd UM Researchers and Students Eva Masin, Scott Mincemoyer, Teal Potter, Neil Snow, Kelly Chadwick, Clare Beelman, Loren Bahls, Ryan Graebner, Victoria Madgwick, Courtney Damren, Michele Disney, 2012 Friends of the Emily Graslie Herbarium Annual Meeting Federal, State, Tribal, NGO Biologists Susan Rinehart (USFS), Darlene Lavelle (USFS), Lea Tuttle, The Annual Meeting of the Friends of the UM Her- Greta Brom-Palkowski, Layla Dumlya (BLM) barium will be held Saturday, October 20 from 10 Other Academic Researchers AM to 2 PM.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Cust-Gall Forest Plan Comments May 2019
    PO Box 8783 ● Missoula, MT 59807-8783 May 15, 2019 Custer Gallatin National Forest Attn: Forest Plan Revision Team P.O. Box 130 Bozeman, MT 59771 Dear Custer-Gallatin Forest Plan Revision Team, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the revision of the Custer Gallatin Forest Plan. We are writing on behalf of over 700 members of the Montana Native Plant Society (MNPS). The Society is a non-profit organization dedicated to preserving, conserving, and studying Montana’s native plants and plant communities, and educating the public about the values of our native flora and its habitats. Our comments, organized by draft document page, are below and submitted online. 2.3.5 Watershed and Aquatics (WTR), Objectives 01 MNPS believes that stream and wetland restoration is important for maintaining plant species diversity. The natural hydrology of wetlands such as fens and marshes as well as riparian areas should be protected and restored as much as possible. 2.3.5 Watershed and Aquatics (WTR), Objectives 03 MNPS believes that protection and restoration of at-risk aquatic plants should be prioritized. 2.3.9 At-Risk Plant Species (PRISK), Objectives 01 At-risk species occurring on Custer-Gallatin should first be ranked based on their degree of risk. For example, Carex gravida is associated with green ash woodlands on the Sioux and Ashland districts. These woodlands are heavily used for livestock grazing. On the other hand, Shoshonea pulvinata is globally rare but is not threatened by human activities at this time, so at this time it should be ranked lower than Carex gravida.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10 • Principles of Conserving the Arctic's Biodiversity
    Chapter 10 Principles of Conserving the Arctic’s Biodiversity Lead Author Michael B. Usher Contributing Authors Terry V.Callaghan, Grant Gilchrist, Bill Heal, Glenn P.Juday, Harald Loeng, Magdalena A. K. Muir, Pål Prestrud Contents Summary . .540 10.1. Introduction . .540 10.2. Conservation of arctic ecosystems and species . .543 10.2.1. Marine environments . .544 10.2.2. Freshwater environments . .546 10.2.3. Environments north of the treeline . .548 10.2.4. Boreal forest environments . .551 10.2.5. Human-modified habitats . .554 10.2.6. Conservation of arctic species . .556 10.2.7. Incorporating traditional knowledge . .558 10.2.8. Implications for biodiversity conservation . .559 10.3. Human impacts on the biodiversity of the Arctic . .560 10.3.1. Exploitation of populations . .560 10.3.2. Management of land and water . .562 10.3.3. Pollution . .564 10.3.4. Development pressures . .566 10.4. Effects of climate change on the biodiversity of the Arctic . .567 10.4.1. Changes in distribution ranges . .568 10.4.2. Changes in the extent of arctic habitats . .570 10.4.3. Changes in the abundance of arctic species . .571 10.4.4. Changes in genetic diversity . .572 10.4.5. Effects on migratory species and their management . .574 10.4.6. Effects caused by non-native species and their management .575 10.4.7. Effects on the management of protected areas . .577 10.4.8. Conserving the Arctic’s changing biodiversity . .579 10.5. Managing biodiversity conservation in a changing environment . .579 10.5.1. Documenting the current biodiversity . .580 10.5.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Lenka Kočková
    MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA PŘÍRODOVĚDECKÁ FAKULTA ÚSTAV BOTANIKY A ZOOLOGIE Velikost genomu a poměr bazí v genomu v čeledi Ranunculaceae Diplomová práce Lenka Kočková Vedoucí práce: Doc. RNDr. Petr Bureš, Ph. D. Brno 2012 Bibliografický záznam Autor: Bc. Lenka Kočková Přírodovědecká fakulta, Masarykova univerzita, Ústav botaniky a zoologie Název práce: Velikost genomu a poměr bazí v genomu v čeledi Ranunculaceae Studijní program: Biologie Studijní obor: Systematická biologie a ekologie (Botanika) Vedoucí práce: Doc. RNDr. Petr Bureš, Ph. D. Akademický rok: 2011/2012 Počet stran: 104 Klíčová slova: Ranunculaceae, průtoková cytometrie, PI/DAPI, DNA obsah, velikost genomu, GC obsah, zastoupení bazí, velikost průduchů, Pignattiho indikační hodnoty Bibliographic Entry Author: Bc. Lenka Kočková Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Department of Botany and Zoology Title of Thesis: Genome size and genomic base composition in Ranunculaceae Programme: Biology Field of Study: Systematic Biology and Ecology (Botany) Supervisor: Doc. RNDr. Petr Bureš, Ph. D. Academic Year: 2011/2012 Number of Pages: 104 Keywords: Ranunculaceae, flow cytometry, PI/DAPI, DNA content, genome size, GC content, base composition, stomatal size, Pignatti‘s indicator values Abstrakt Pomocí průtokové cytometrie byla změřena velikost genomu a AT/GC genomový poměr u 135 druhů z čeledi Ranunculaceae. U druhů byla naměřena délka a šířka průduchů a z literatury byly získány údaje o počtu chromozomů a ekologii druhů. Velikost genomu se v rámci čeledi liší 63-krát. Nejmenší genom byl naměřen u Aquilegia canadensis (2C = 0,75 pg), největší u Ranunculus lingua (2C = 47,93 pg). Mezi dvěma hlavními podčeleděmi Ranunculoideae a Thalictroideae je ve velikosti genomu markantní rozdíl (2C = 2,48 – 47,94 pg a 0,75 – 4,04 pg).
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Volume 2
    Appendix F Species List Appendix F: Species List F. Species List F.1 Lists The following list and three tables denote the bird, mammal, fish, and plant species known to occur in Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (Arctic Refuge, Refuge). F.1.1 Birds of Arctic Refuge A total of 201 bird species have been recorded on Arctic Refuge. This list describes their status and abundance. Many birds migrate outside of the Refuge in the winter, so unless otherwise noted, the information is for spring, summer, or fall. Bird names and taxonomic classification follow American Ornithologists' Union (1998). F.1.1.1 Definitions of classifications used Regions of the Refuge . Coastal Plain – The area between the coast and the Brooks Range. This area is sometimes split into coastal areas (lagoons, barrier islands, and Beaufort Sea) and inland areas (uplands near the foothills of the Brooks Range). Brooks Range – The mountains, valleys, and foothills north and south of the Continental Divide. South Side – The foothills, taiga, and boreal forest south of the Brooks Range. Status . Permanent Resident – Present throughout the year and breeds in the area. Summer Resident – Only present from May to September. Migrant – Travels through on the way to wintering or breeding areas. Breeder – Documented as a breeding species. Visitor – Present as a non-breeding species. * – Not documented. Abundance . Abundant – Very numerous in suitable habitats. Common – Very likely to be seen or heard in suitable habitats. Fairly Common – Numerous but not always present in suitable habitats. Uncommon – Occurs regularly but not always observed because of lower abundance or secretive behaviors.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyperaceae of Alberta
    AN ILLUSTRATED KEY TO THE CYPERACEAE OF ALBERTA Compiled and writen by Linda Kershaw and Lorna Allen April 2019 © Linda J. Kershaw & Lorna Allen This key was compiled using information primarily from and the Flora North America Association (2008), Douglas et al. (1998), and Packer and Gould (2017). Taxonomy follows VASCAN (Brouillet, 2015). The main references are listed at the end of the key. Please try the key this summer and let us know if there are ways in which it can be improved. Over the winter, we hope to add illustrations for most of the entries. The 2015 S-ranks of rare species (S1; S1S2; S2; S2S3; SU, according to ACIMS, 2015) are noted in superscript ( S1; S2;SU) after the species names. For more details go to the ACIMS web site. Similarly, exotic species are followed by a superscript X, XX if noxious and XXX if prohibited noxious (X; XX; XXX) according to the Alberta Weed Control Act (2016). CYPERACEAE SedgeFamily Key to Genera 1b 01a Flowers either ♂ or ♀; ovaries/achenes enclosed in a sac-like or scale-like structure 1a (perigynium) .....................Carex 01b Flowers with both ♂ and ♀ parts (sometimes some either ♂ or ♀); ovaries/achenes not in a perigynium .........................02 02a Spikelets somewhat fattened, with keeled scales in 2 vertical rows, grouped in ± umbrella- shaped clusters; fower bristles (perianth) 2a absent ....................... Cyperus 02b Spikelets round to cylindrical, with scales 2b spirally attached, variously arranged; fower bristles usually present . 03 03a Achenes tipped with a rounded protuberance (enlarged style-base; tubercle) . 04 03b Achenes without a tubercle (achenes 3a 3b often beaked, but without an enlarged protuberence) .......................05 04a Spikelets single; stems leafess .
    [Show full text]
  • Eriophorum Scheuchzeri Hoppe (White Cottongrass): a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Eriophorum scheuchzeri Hoppe (white cottongrass): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project March 2, 2006 Juanita A. R. Ladyman, Ph.D. JnJ Associates LLC 6760 S. Kit Carson Circle East Centennial, CO 80122 Peer Review Administered by Society of Conservation Biology Ladyman, J.A.R. (2006, March 2). Eriophorum scheuchzeri Hoppe (white cottongrass): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/ projects/scp/assessments/eriophorumscheuchzeri.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The time spent and help given by all the people and institutions mentioned in the reference section are gratefully acknowledged. I value the information provided by Jacques Cayouette, with Agriculture and Agri-food Canada, and thank him for his help. I also appreciate the access to files and the assistance given to me by Andrew Kratz, USDA Forest Service Region 2, and Chuck Davis, US Fish and Wildlife Service, both in Denver, Colorado. The information sent from Bonnie Heidel, Wyoming Natural Diversity Database; Teresa Prendusi, USDA Forest Service Region 4; Thomas A. Zanoni, New York Botanical Garden; Rusty Russell, United States National Herbarium; Ronald Hartman and Joy Handley, Rocky Mountain Herbarium at the University of Wyoming; Alan Batten, University of Alaska Museum of the North; Mary Barkworth and Michael Piep, the Intermountain Herbarium; Jennifer Penny and Marta Donovan, British Columbia Conservation Data Centre; John Rintoul, Alberta Natural Heritage Information Center; and Ann Kelsey, Garrett Herbarium, are also very much appreciated. I would also like to thank Deb Golanty, Helen Fowler Library at Denver Botanic Gardens, for her persistence in retrieving some rather obscure articles.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora and Geoecology of Mont De La Table, Gaspésie, Québec
    RHODORA, Vol. 117, No. 969, pp. 1–40, 2015 E Copyright 2015 by the New England Botanical Club doi: 10.3119/14-07; first published on-line March 11, 2015. VASCULAR FLORA AND GEOECOLOGY OF MONT DE LA TABLE, GASPE´ SIE, QUE´ BEC SCOTT W. BAILEY USDA Forest Service, 234 Mirror Lake Road, North Woodstock, NH 03262 e-mail: [email protected] JOANN HOY 21 Steam Mill Road, Auburn, NH 03032 CHARLES V. COGBILL 82 Walker Lane, Plainfield, VT 05667 ABSTRACT. The influence of substrate lithology on the distribution of many vascular and nonvascular plants has long been recognized, especially in alpine, subalpine, and other rocky habitats. In particular, plants have been classified as dependent on high-calcium substrates (i.e., calcicoles) based on common restriction to habitats developed in calcareous rocks, such as limestone and marble. In a classic 1907 paper on the influence of substrate on plants, M. L. Fernald singled out a particular meadow on Mont de la Table in the Chic-Choc Mountains of Que´bec for its unusual co-occurrence of strict calcicole and calcifuge (i.e., acidophile) plant taxa. We re-located this site, investigated substrate factors responsible for its unusual plant diversity, and documented current plant distributions. No calcareous rocks were found on site. However, inclusions of calcareous rocks were found farther up the mountain. The highest pH and dissolved calcium concentrations in surface waters were found in a series of springs that deliver groundwater, presumably influenced by calcareous rocks up the slope. Within the habitat delineated by common occurrences of calcicole species, available soil calcium varied by a factor of five and soil pH varied by almost 1.5 units, depending on microtopography and relative connection with groundwater.
    [Show full text]
  • Fens and Their Rare Plants in the Beartooth Mountains, Shoshone National Forest, Wyoming
    United States Department of Agriculture Fens and Their Rare Plants in the Beartooth Mountains, Shoshone National Forest, Wyoming Bonnie Heidel, Walter Fertig, Sabine Mellmann-Brown, Kent E. Houston, and Kathleen A. Dwire Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Report Service Research Station RMRS-GTR-369 November 2017 Heidel, Bonnie; Fertig, Walter; Mellmann-Brown, Sabine; Houston, Kent E.; Dwire, Kathleen A. 2017. Fens and their rare plants in the Beartooth Mountains, Shoshone National Forest, Wyoming. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-369. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 110 p. Abstract Fens are common wetlands in the Beartooth Mountains on the Shoshone National Forest, Clarks Fork Ranger District, in Park County, Wyoming. Fens harbor plant species found in no other habitats, and some rare plants occurring in Beartooth fens are found nowhere else in Wyoming. This report summarizes the studies on Beartooth fens from 1962 to 2009, which have contributed to current knowledge of rare plant distributions and biodiversity conservation. The study area is the Wyoming portion of the Beartooth Mountains in the Middle Rocky Mountains. Here, we profile 18 fens that occur over the range of elevations, settings, geomorphic landforms, and vegetation. The wetland flora from these 18 fens is composed of 58 families, 156 genera, and 336 vascular plant species—more than 10 percent of the known Wyoming flora. We discuss 32 rare vascular plant species and 1 bryophyte species associated with Beartooth fens and their State and regional significance. Protection and management of Beartooth fens are addressed in guidance documents prepared by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ploidy in the Alpine Sedge Kobresia Pygmaea (Cyperaceae) and Related Species: Combined Application of Chromosome Counts, New Microsatellite Markers and flow Cytometry
    bs_bs_banner Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2014, ••, ••–••. With 1 figure Ploidy in the alpine sedge Kobresia pygmaea (Cyperaceae) and related species: combined application of chromosome counts, new microsatellite markers and flow cytometry ELKE SEEBER1*, GRIT WINTERFELD2, ISABELL HENSEN2,3, TIMOTHY F. SHARBEL4, WALTER DURKA5, JIANQUAN LIU6, YONG-PING YANG7 and KARSTEN WESCHE1,3 1Botany Department, Senckenberg Museum of Natural History Goerlitz, PO Box 300 154, D-02806 Goerlitz, Germany 2Department of Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Am Kirchtor 1, D-06108 Halle (Saale), Germany 3German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany 4Apomixis Research Group, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research–IPK, Corrensstraße 3, D-06466 Stadt Seeland, OT Gatersleben, Germany 5Department of Community Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZ, Theodor-Lieser-Straße 4, D-06120 Halle (Saale), Germany 6State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystem, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China 7Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Heilongtan 650204, Kunming, China Received 26 October 2013; revised 12 May 2014; accepted for publication 29 May 2014 Polyploidy is a fundamental mechanism in evolution, but is hard to detect in taxa with agmatoploidy or aneuploidy. We tested whether a combination of chromosome counting, microsatellite analyses and flow cytometric measure- ments represents a suitable approach for the detection of basic chromosome numbers and ploidy in Kobresia (Cyperaceae). Chromosome counting resulted in 2n = 64 for Kobresia pygmaea and K. cercostachys,2n = 58 and 64 for K. myosuroides, and 2n = 72 for K.
    [Show full text]
  • And Siberian Cranes (G
    COMPARATIVE BREEDING ECOLOGY OF LESSER SANDHILL CRANES (GRUS CANADENSIS CANADENSIS) AND SIBERIAN CRANES (G. LEUCOGERANUS) IN EASTERN SIBERIA A Dissertation by TSUYOSHI WATANABE Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 2006 Major Subject: Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences COMPARATIVE BREEDING ECOLOGY OF LESSER SANDHILL CRANES (GRUS CANADENSIS CANADENSIS) AND SIBERIAN CRANES (G. LEUCOGERANUS) IN EASTERN SIBERIA A Dissertation by TSUYOSHI WATANABE Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Co-Chairs of Committee, R. Douglas Slack Felipe Chavez-Ramirez Committee Members, Nova J. Silvy Larry J. Ringer Interim Head of Department, Delbert M. Gatlin III December 2006 Major Subject: Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences iii ABSTRACT Comparative Breeding Ecology of Lesser Sandhill Cranes (Grus canadensis canadensis) and Siberian Cranes (G. leucogeranus) in Eastern Siberia. (December 2006) Tsuyoshi Watanabe, B.A., Hokkaido University for Education; M.S., Southern Connecticut State University; D.V.M., Michigan State University Co-Chairs of Advisory Committee: Dr. R. Douglas Slack Dr. Felipe Chavez-Ramirez Populations of Lesser Sandhill Crane (Grus canadensis canadensis) have been increasing during the last decades in Eastern Siberia, an area historically known as breeding grounds of endangered Siberian Cranes (G. leucogeranus). Significant overlap in niche dimensions between the two species may occur and could lead to competition between them. Therefore, this study of comparative breeding ecology of common Lesser Sandhill Cranes and endangered Siberian Cranes was performed.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Species Lists from Npspecies As of September 30, 2001 for Denali National Park and Preserve
    Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Species Lists From NPSpecies as of September 30, 2001 For Denali National Park and Preserve A Supplemental Report to the Final Report – Compilation of Existing Species Data In Alaska’s National Parks By Julia Lenz, Tracey Gotthardt, Mike Kelly, and Robert Lipkin Alaska Natural Heritage Program Environment and Natural Resources Institute University of Alaska Anchorage For National Park Service Inventory and Monitoring Program Alaska Region September 30, 2001 In Partial Completion of Cooperative Agreement #9910-00-013 University of Alaska Anchorage Environment and Natural Resources Institute 707 A St. Anchorage, Alaska 9950 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 VASCULAR PLANT SPECIES LIST ........................................................................ 2 FISH SPECIES LIST ................................................................................................ 63 BIRD SPECIES LIST................................................................................................ 64 MAMMAL SPECIES LIST ...................................................................................... 72 AMPHIBIAN SPECIES LIST................................................................................... 75 i INTRODUCTION This report contains species lists for vascular plant and vertebrate species entered in the National Park Service’s NPSpecies database, by the Alaska Natural Heritage Program (AKNHP) for Denali
    [Show full text]