Cyperaceae of Alberta

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cyperaceae of Alberta AN ILLUSTRATED KEY TO THE CYPERACEAE OF ALBERTA Compiled and writen by Linda Kershaw and Lorna Allen April 2019 © Linda J. Kershaw & Lorna Allen This key was compiled using information primarily from and the Flora North America Association (2008), Douglas et al. (1998), and Packer and Gould (2017). Taxonomy follows VASCAN (Brouillet, 2015). The main references are listed at the end of the key. Please try the key this summer and let us know if there are ways in which it can be improved. Over the winter, we hope to add illustrations for most of the entries. The 2015 S-ranks of rare species (S1; S1S2; S2; S2S3; SU, according to ACIMS, 2015) are noted in superscript ( S1; S2;SU) after the species names. For more details go to the ACIMS web site. Similarly, exotic species are followed by a superscript X, XX if noxious and XXX if prohibited noxious (X; XX; XXX) according to the Alberta Weed Control Act (2016). CYPERACEAE SedgeFamily Key to Genera 1b 01a Flowers either ♂ or ♀; ovaries/achenes enclosed in a sac-like or scale-like structure 1a (perigynium) .....................Carex 01b Flowers with both ♂ and ♀ parts (sometimes some either ♂ or ♀); ovaries/achenes not in a perigynium .........................02 02a Spikelets somewhat fattened, with keeled scales in 2 vertical rows, grouped in ± umbrella- shaped clusters; fower bristles (perianth) 2a absent ....................... Cyperus 02b Spikelets round to cylindrical, with scales 2b spirally attached, variously arranged; fower bristles usually present . 03 03a Achenes tipped with a rounded protuberance (enlarged style-base; tubercle) . 04 03b Achenes without a tubercle (achenes 3a 3b often beaked, but without an enlarged protuberence) .......................05 04a Spikelets single; stems leafess . .Eleocharis 04b Spikelets in 1-2 heads of 1-10 fowers each; stems with slender, bristle-like leaves; w of Edmonton and n of Athabasca . Rhynchospora capillacea S2 5a;6a 05a Bristles silky, ≥10-15X longer than the achene at maturity .......................... 06 05b Bristles 1-8, not much elongated at maturity . 4b ..................................07 4a 06a Achenes 3-sided, with 10-25 minutely barbed 5b hairs; styles 3; leaves ≤400x6 mm . ......................... Eriophorum 06b Achenes 2-sided, with 6 smooth hairs; styles 2; leaves <20x1 mm Trichophorum (in part) 6b 07a Involucral bracts absent or single at the base of a clearly terminal spike, not leaf-like . 08 07b Involucral bracts 1-many, leaf-like or resembling an extension of the stem with a side spike . 09 7a 08a Spikelets 5-8, in 2 vertical rows, crowded in a terminal spike ±1-2 cm long; achenes stalked, long-beaked; leaves in 2 vertical rows, 20-120 8a x 1-3 mm, reduced to scales at the stem base; Wood Buffalo s to Clearwater River . Blysmopsis rufa S2 [Blysmus rufus] 08b Spikelets single, ≤7 mm long, spirally arranged in compact spikes; achenes ±stalkless, 7b beakless or short-beaked; leaves <10 x 1 mm 8b . Trichophorum (in part) 3 09a Involucral bracts single, appearing as an extension of a leafess stem; fower cluster(s) appearing to grow from the side of the stem; 9a stems cylindrical or 3-angled/sided. .10 10a 09b Involucral bracts ≥2, fat and spreading; fower cluster(s) clearly growing from the stem tip; stems 3-angled ...................... 12 10a Stems stout, cylindrical; spikelets many, 9b usually in umbrella-shaped clusters . .Schoenoplectus (in part) 10b Stems slender, 3-angled/sided; spikelets generally 1-5, stalkless . 11 11a Leaves stiffy erect; ligules edged with hairs; stems not sharply angled; achenes broadly rounded at the tip, covered with a network of raised veins (reticulate). 11b . Amphiscirpus nevadensis [Scirpus nevadensis] 11b Leaves often spreading; ligules not edged with hairs; stems sharply angled; achenes tipped with a short, abrupt point (apiculate), smooth sided . Schoenoplectus pungens [Scirpus pungens] 12a Spikelets >10 mm long, 2-12 in a head-like 11a or umbrella-shaped cluster; rootstocks with swollen joints; ligules absent . ...................... Bolboschoenus 12b Spikelets <8 mm long, numerous, in dense or repeatedly branched umbrella-shaped clusters; rootstocks without swollen joints; ligules present. Scirpus 12a 12b - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BOLBOSCHOENUS Tuber-bulrush 01a Spikelets all or mostly stalkless; styles 2-branched; achenes 2-sided, 2.3-4.1 mm long, buoyant; stems 30-70 cm tall . Bolboschoenus maritimus [Schoenoplectus maritimus; Scirpus paludosus] 01b Spikelets all or mostly stalked; styles 3-branched; achene 3-sided, 3.8-5.5 mm long, 1a 1b not buoyant; stems mostly 100-150 cm tall; cAB . Bolboschoenus fuviatilis S1 [Schoenoplectus fuviatilis; Scirpus fuviatilis] 4 CAREX Sedge 01a Achenes enclosed in a scale-like perigynium open along 1 side; fowers with at least one group of 1 ♀ plus 1-3 ♂ fowers in the axil of 1 1a scale ..............................02 1b 01b Achenes enclosed in a sac-like perigynium with an opening at the tip through which the stigmas protrudes; fowers 1 per scale . 03 02a Spikes simple, linear, 2-3 mm wide; leaves of previous year reduced to bladeless sheaths at fowering time . Carex myosuroides [Kobresia myosuroides] 02b Spikes compound, more egg-shaped, (2)3- 8 mm wide; leaves of the previous year with conspicuous dried blades at fowering time . .Carex simpliciuscula 2a 2b [Kobresia simpliciuscula] 03a Spikelets 1 ....................Group 1 03b Spikelets >1 (sometimes densely clustered in a head) ............................04 04a Stigmas 2; achenes 2-sided (lens-shaped to 3b 3a planoconvex) . .Group 2 04b Stigmas 3(4); achenes 3(4)-angled/sided (mixed with 2-stigma/2-sided achenes in Carex petricosa) . Group 3 4b 4a - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GROUP 1 Single spikes 01a Spikes with ♂ fowers only . .02 01b Spikes with at least 1 ♀ fower . .03 02a Plant bases yellow to brown or black, arising singly or 2-3 together from long, thread-like 2b rootstocks; leaves inrolled, 0.3-0.7 mm wide . Carex gynocrates (in part) 1a 02b Plant bases reddish or purplish, tufted from short rootstocks; leaves fat or ± channelled, 2a 1-3 mm wide . Carex scirpoidea (in part) 03a Stigmas 2; achenes 2-sided . .04 03b Stigmas 3(4); achenes 3-sided (rarely mixed with 2-stigma/2-sided achenes) . .08 4b; 5b 04a Spikes ♂ or ♀ (or nearly so; often with 1 ♀ fower at the base of a ♂ spike); scales of 3a ♀ fowers pointed; plants with long slender 3b rootstocks . Carex gynocrates (in part) 4a 04b Spikes with ♂ above ♀ fowers (androgynous); scales of ♀ fowers blunt-tipped; plants tufted or with short rootstocks . 05 05a Mature perigynia erect to ascending; plants with conspicuous, long-persistent, fbrous leaf bases . Carex nardina (in part) 05b Mature perigynia (at least the lowest) spreading or bent back; plants without conspicuous leaf 5a bases .............................06 5 06a Mature perigynia ±glossy, without veins, 3-4(5) x 1-1.3 mm, stalked; stem bases without red . Carex micropoda [Carex pyrenaica] (in part) 06b Mature perigynia dull, with a few veins on the 7a outer/lower side, 2-4 x 1.5-1.8 mm, not stalked; stem bases reddish. .07 07a Spikes 5-6 mm long, the ♂ part prominent; perigynia 2-4 mm long with a gradually tapered 7b beak ≤0.5 mm long . Carex capitata 07b Spikes usually <5 mm long, the ♂ part not 6a prominent; perigynia ±2 mm long, abruptly tapered to a 0.75 mm beak; reported but unconfrmed . Carex arctogena SNA 08a Perigynia hairy, at least on the beak . 09 08b Perigynia hairless ....................10 09a Spikes with ♂ above ♀ fowers; leaves inrolled, 8a 8b 0.3-0.7 mm wide, with conspicuous brownish sheaths from the previous year; stem bases not red or purple; densely tufted plants of dry 9a plains and ridges. Carex flifolia 09b Spike all ♀ (usually); leaves widely V-shaped, mostly 1.5-2.5 mm wide; stem bases red or 10a purple; loosely clumped to spreading plants of 9b moist sites . Carex scirpoidea (in part) 10a Scales of lower ♀ fowers ≥1 cm long, leaf-like; lower edges of ♂ fower scales fused . 11 10b Scales of lower ♀ fowers <1 cm long, not leafy; lower edges of ♂ fower scales free .13 10b 11a Perigynia (4.8)5-6(6.6) mm long, gradually tapered to a 2-3 mm beak (measured from the 11a tip to the top of the achene), loosely enveloping the achene; woodlands in c AB and the c to s cordillera . Carex backii (in part) 11b Perigynia (3.2)4-5(5.4) mm long, abruptly tapered to a 0.5-1.5 mm beak (tip to top of achene), tightly wrapped around the achene; not in c AB or n of Kananaskis . .12 12b 12a Leaves dark green to whitish coated with pale, translucent edges, smooth or rough on lower edges and midribs; perigynia minutely pimpled on the upper 1/3, rough to touch on the beak; achenes 2.5–3 mm long; se AB, Cypress Hills S1 12a . Carex saximontana (in part) 12b Leaves dull green to yellowish green, without a whitish coating, green at the edges, densely minutely pimpled (papillose) on the lower edges and midribs; perigynia smooth on body and beak; achenes 2.8–3.5 mm long; Crows- nest Pass . Carex cordillerana S1 (in part) 13a ♀ scales shed before the perigynia mature; perigynia stalked, usually bent sharply back at maturity (at least the lowest ones) . .14 13b ♀ scales persistent; perigynia not bent sharply 13a 13b back at maturity .....................17 6 → 15a 14a Perigynia straw-coloured, ≥4-6X as long as 14a wide; styles continuous with the achene. .15 14b Perigynia dark-tinged, 1.5-4X as long as wide; styles jointed with the achene and soon shed; 15b alpine slopes ........................ 16 15a Perigynia 3.5-4.5 mm long (excluding bristle), with a stiff bristle (rachilla) (→) projecting from the opening at the tip and exceeding the style; stem leaves 4-8; scales of upper ♀ fowers 2.4-3 mm long; mountain wetlands .
Recommended publications
  • Bolboschoenus Glaucus (Lam.) S.G. Smith, a New Species in the Flora of the Ancient Near East
    Veget Hist Archaeobot DOI 10.1007/s00334-011-0305-3 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Bolboschoenus glaucus (Lam.) S.G. Smith, a new species in the flora of the ancient Near East Miche`le M. Wollstonecroft • Zdenka Hroudova´ • Gordon C. Hillman • Dorian Q. Fuller Received: 5 October 2010 / Accepted: 23 May 2011 Ó Springer-Verlag 2011 Abstract Taxonomic advancement in the genus Bolbo- Bolboschoenus in present-day Turkey, indicating that it has schoenus (Cyperaceae, formerly included in the genus a long history of occurrence in this region. The environ- Scirpus) have resulted in the re-classification of the plant mental, ecological and economic implications of this new previously known as Bolboschoenus maritimus (synonym information suggest that it is entirely feasible that this plant Scirpus maritimus) into several closely-related but distinct provided late Pleistocene and Holocene Near Eastern Bolboschoenus species This improved taxonomy is of people with a dependable and possibly a staple food source. importance for archaeobotanical investigations of ancient sites within the temperate zones, where this genus fre- Keywords Bolboschoenus glaucus Á Epipalaeolithic Á quently occurs, because it allows more precise definitions Near East Á Neolithic Á Taxonomy Á Nutlet characteristics of the ecological requirements and growing habits of each species. Moreover, it details the distinct morphological and anatomical characteristics of the fruit (nutlets) of each Introduction species. Using these new nutlet classification criteria, we re-examined charred archaeological specimens which had Bolboschoenus maritimus (sea club-rush) is a semi-aquatic previously been identified as B. maritimus (or S. mariti- species of the Cyperaceae that produces edible nutlets, mus), from five Near Eastern late Pleistocene and early tubers and shoots (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Abildgaardieae (Cyperaceae) Inferred from ITS and Trnl–F Data Kioumars Ghamkhar University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 23 | Issue 1 Article 12 2007 Phylogeny of Abildgaardieae (Cyperaceae) Inferred from ITS and trnL–F Data Kioumars Ghamkhar University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia Adam D. Marchant Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Karen L. Wilson Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Jeremy J. Bruhl University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Ghamkhar, Kioumars; Marchant, Adam D.; Wilson, Karen L.; and Bruhl, Jeremy J. (2007) "Phylogeny of Abildgaardieae (Cyperaceae) Inferred from ITS and trnL–F Data," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 23: Iss. 1, Article 12. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol23/iss1/12 Aliso 23, pp. 149–164 ᭧ 2007, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden PHYLOGENY OF ABILDGAARDIEAE (CYPERACEAE) INFERRED FROM ITS AND trnL–F DATA KIOUMARS GHAMKHAR,1,2,4 ADAM D. MARCHANT,2 KAREN L. WILSON,2 AND JEREMY J. BRUHL1,3 1Botany, Centre for Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia; 2National Herbarium of New South Wales, Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney, Mrs Macquaries Road, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia 3Corresponding author ([email protected]) ABSTRACT Within the tribe Abildgaardieae, the relationships between Fimbristylis and its relatives have not been certain, and the limits of Fimbristylis have been unclear, with Bulbostylis and Abildgaardia variously combined with it and each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on the Restoration of Herbaceous Vegetation in Some Areas in Bacǎu End Harghita County
    Studii şi Cercetări Martie 2020 Biologie 29/1 14-19 Universitatea”Vasile Alecsandri” din Bacău OBSERVATIONS ON THE RESTORATION OF HERBACEOUS VEGETATION IN SOME AREAS IN BACǍU END HARGHITA COUNTY Milian Gurău Key words: natural ecological reconstruction, Calthetum laetae- Ligularietum sibiricae N. Ştefan 2007, Botriochloetum ischaemi (Krist 1937) I. Pop 1977, Thymo panonici-Chrysopogonetum grylii Doniţă et all 1992 INTRODUCTION the association Calthetum laetae - Ligularietum sibiricae Ştefan 2007. Since 1990, the social situation in Romania The Trotuş River has its source upstream has changed in all fields, nature it self has not Făgetul de Sus village (Harghita County); the first escaped some of this influence, often negative stream, a tributary on the right side, located near the aspects have been reported, although the areas of village of Lunca de Sus, has a swampy area protected nature have increased. After 1-2 decades completely surrounded by spruce. Here there was from the decrease or even disappearance of identified an area with numerous specimens of anthropogenic influences on insignificant areas of Ligularia sibiricaand other rare plants. It is an easily low-quality agricultural land, there was an accessible area, surrounded by forest and pasture, but unexpected return of plant formations, which are not which has never been destroyed by the locals’ cattle. identical to those of the primary vegetation, but It currently benefits from the existence of a small which have many elements in common. These electric fence. natural experiments have transformed agricultural Regarding research history in these places, we lands without economic yield into transitional can mention that two more such areas were cited, one meadows which, after 2-3 decades, also came to nearby, in Făgeţel (Ghergheli şi Raţiu, 1974; Palfalvi include extensive scrubland regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 植物研究雜誌 J. Jpn. Bot. 76: 339-343 (2001) Delineation Of
    植物研究雑誌 J. J. Jpn. Bo t. 76: 76: 339-343 (200 1) Delineation Delineation of Schoenoplectus sect. Malacogeton (Cyperaceae) , New Combination ,and Distinctions of Species a b S. S. Galen SMITH and Eisuke HA YASAKA aDepartment aDepartment of Biology ,University of Wisconsin-Whitewater , Whitewater ,Wisconsin , 53190 U.S. A.; bBotanical bBotanical Garden ,Graduate School of Science ,Tohoku University ,Sendai , 980-0862 JAPAN (Received (Received on 乱1ay 14 , 2001) The new combination ,Schoenoplectus sec t. Malacogeton (Ohwi) S. G. Smith & Hayasaka , is made and a description of the section is provided. Schoenoplectus nipponicus ,Sc h. etuberculatus ,Sch. torreyi and Sch. subterminalis 訂 e included in sec t. Malacogeton , and a key to these is given. We recognize the sections Schoenoplectus , Actaeogeton , Malacogeton and Supini in the genus Schoenoplectus , and a key to the sec- tions tions and a list of North American and East Asian species included in each section are provided. provided. Key words: Cyperaceae , new combination , Schoenoplectus sec t. Malacogeton , taxonomy taxonomy The polymorphic and polyphyletic Scirpus 2000 , Koyama et al. 2000 , Smith and L. L. s. la t. in recent ye 紅 s has been subdivided Yatskievych 1996 ,Wilson 1981). Of these into into about 17 genera (Bruhl 1995 , segregate genera Schoenoplectus is comp 紅 a- Goetghebeur 1998 , Wilson 1981 , 1989). tively large , with species distributed world- Scirpus Scirpus as stric t1 y defined includes about 30 wide , the number of which is v紅 iously species species occurring mainly in the temperate re- estimated at 50 spp. (Goetghebeur 1998) ,60 gions gions of the Northem Hemisphere , with S.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Status of Blysmus Compressus (Flat Sedge) in the Sefton Coast Sand-Dunes, North Merseyside, UK
    British & Irish Botany 1(2): 70-90, 2019 Changing status of Blysmus compressus (Flat Sedge) in the Sefton Coast sand-dunes, north Merseyside, UK Philip H. Smith* 9 Hayward Court, Watchyard Lane, Formby, Liverpool, UK, L37 3QP *Corresponding author: Philip H. Smith, email: [email protected] This pdf constitutes the Version of Record published on 21st May 2019 Abstract A 2018 survey of the nationally ‘Vulnerable’ Blysmus compressus (Flat-sedge) in the Sefton Coast sand-dunes, north Merseyside (v.c.59, South Lancashire), aimed to update information collected on distribution and habitats a decade earlier. As in 2008, the plant was mainly found in calcareous dune-slacks of recent origin, with short, open, species- rich vegetation on gley soils with a relatively high pH. Sites with a lower sward height supported a higher percentage cover of B. compressus. The largest populations were associated with sites that had been disturbed by recreational trampling, occasional vehicle use and/or grazing, especially by rabbits. Twenty-two sites were recorded, seven being new. Overall, the area occupied by B. compressus declined by 17%, two 2008 sites being lost. Similarly, an estimate of 15-20,000 plants in the earlier survey fell to 12,600. Losses were attributed to vegetation overgrowth and scrub development, partly resulting from lower rabbit numbers and reduced management input. The plant occurred in a range of vegetation types but matches to known UK National Vegetation Classification communities were generally poor. Management methods to conserve B. compressus and other vulnerable taxa are discussed. Key words Declining species; dune management; dune-slacks; grazing; rabbits; vegetation overgrowth.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • THE JEPSON GLOBE a Newsletter from the Friends of the Jepson Herbarium
    THE JEPSON GLOBE A Newsletter from the Friends of The Jepson Herbarium VOLUME 26 NUMBER 1, Spring 2016 Curator’s Column: Museomics The Jepson Manual: Vascular Reveals Secrets of the Dead Plants of California, Second By Bruce G. Baldwin Edition: Supplement III Over the last decade, herbaria By Bruce G. Baldwin have received well-deserved public- The latest set of revisions to The Jep- ity as treasure troves of undiscovered son Manual, second edition (TJM2) and biodiversity, with the recognition that the Jepson eFlora was released online most “new” species named in the last in December 2015. The rapid pace of half-century have long resided in col- discovery and description of vascular lections prior to their detection and plant taxa that are new-to-science for original description. The prospect also California and the rarity and endanger- has emerged for unlocking the secrets of ment of most of those new taxa have plants and other organisms that no lon- warranted prioritization of revisions ger share our planet as living organisms that incorporate such diversity — and and, sadly, reside only in collections. Map of California, split apart to show newly introduced, putatively aggressive Technological advances that now al- the Regions of the Jepson eFlora. invasives — so that detection of such low for DNA sequencing on a genomic Source: Jepson Flora Project. plants in the field and in collections scale also are well suited for studying Regional dichotomous keys now is not impeded. The continuing taxo- old, highly degraded specimens, as re- nomic reorganization of genera and, to cent reconstruction of the Neanderthal available for the Jepson eFlora some extent, families in order to reflect genome has shown.
    [Show full text]
  • C6 Noncarice Sedge
    CYPERACEAE etal Got Sedge? Part Two revised 24 May 2015. Draft from Designs On Nature; Up Your C 25 SEDGES, FOINS COUPANTS, LAÎCHES, ROUCHES, ROUCHETTES, & some mostly wet things in the sedge family. Because Bill Gates has been shown to eat footnotes (burp!, & enjoy it), footnotes are (italicized in the body of the text) for their protection. Someone who can spell caespitose only won way has know imagination. Much of the following is taken verbatim from other works, & often not credited. There is often not a way to paraphrase or rewrite habitat or descriptive information without changing the meaning. I am responsible for any mistakes in quoting or otherwise. This is a learning tool, & a continuation of an idea of my friend & former employer, Jock Ingels, LaFayette Home Nursery, who hoped to present more available information about a plant in one easily accessible place, instead of scattered though numerous sources. This is a work in perpetual progress, a personal learning tool, full uv misstakes, & written as a personal means instead of a public end. Redundant, repetitive, superfluous, & contradictory information is present. It is being consolidated. CYPERACEAE Sauergrasgewächse SEDGES, aka BIESIES, SEGGEN Formally described in 1789 by De Jussieu. The family name is derived from the genus name Cyperus, from the Greek kupeiros, meaning sedge. Many species are grass-like, being tufted, with long, thin, narrow leaves, jointed stems, & branched inflorescence of small flowers, & are horticulturally lumped with grasses as graminoids. Archer (2005) suggests the term graminoid be used for true grasses, & cyperoid be used for sedges. (If physical anthropologists have hominoids & hominids, why don’t we have graminoids & graminids?) There are approximately 104 genera, 4 subfamilies, 14 tribes, & about 5000 species worldwide, with 27 genera & 843 species in North America (Ball et al 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Maine's Endangered and Threatened Plants
    University of Southern Maine USM Digital Commons Maine Collection 1990 Maine's Endangered and Threatened Plants Maine State Planning Office Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/me_collection Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Botany Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Forest Biology Commons, Forest Management Commons, Other Forestry and Forest Sciences Commons, Plant Biology Commons, and the Weed Science Commons Recommended Citation Maine State Planning Office, "Maine's Endangered and Threatened Plants" (1990). Maine Collection. 49. https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/me_collection/49 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by USM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine Collection by an authorized administrator of USM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BACKGROUND and PURPOSE In an effort to encourage the protection of native Maine plants that are naturally reduced or low in number, the State Planning Office has compiled a list of endangered and threatened plants. Of Maine's approximately 1500 native vascular plant species, 155, or about 10%, are included on the Official List of Maine's Plants that are Endangered or Threatened. Of the species on the list, three are also listed at the federal level. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. has des·ignated the Furbish's Lousewort (Pedicularis furbishiae) and Small Whorled Pogonia (lsotria medeoloides) as Endangered species and the Prairie White-fringed Orchid (Platanthera leucophaea) as Threatened. Listing rare plants of a particular state or region is a process rather than an isolated and finite event.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Flora of Rarău Massif (Eastern Carpathians, Romania). Note Ii
    Memoirs of the Scientific Sections of the Romanian Academy Tome XXXVI, 2013 BIOLOGY THE VASCULAR FLORA OF RARĂU MASSIF (EASTERN CARPATHIANS, ROMANIA). NOTE II ADRIAN OPREA1 and CULIŢĂ SÎRBU2 1 “Anastasie Fătu” Botanical Garden, Str. Dumbrava Roşie, nr. 7-9, 700522–Iaşi, Romania 2 University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Iaşi, Faculty of Agriculture, Str. Mihail Sadoveanu, nr. 3, 700490–Iaşi, Romania Corresponding author: [email protected] This second part of the paper about the vascular flora of Rarău Massif listed approximately half of the whole number of the species registered by the authors in their field trips or already included in literature on the same area. Other taxa have been added to the initial list of plants, so that, the total number of taxa registered by the authors in Rarău Massif amount to 1443 taxa (1133 species and 310 subspecies, varieties and forms). There was signaled out the alien taxa on the surveyed area (18 species) and those dubious presence of some taxa for the same area (17 species). Also, there were listed all the vascular plants, protected by various laws or regulations, both internal or international, existing in Rarău (i.e. 189 taxa). Finally, there has been assessed the degree of wild flora conservation, using several indicators introduced in literature by Nowak, as they are: conservation indicator (C), threat conservation indicator) (CK), sozophytisation indicator (W), and conservation effectiveness indicator (E). Key words: Vascular flora, Rarău Massif, Romania, conservation indicators. 1. INTRODUCTION A comprehensive analysis of Rarău flora, in terms of plant diversity, taxonomic structure, biological, ecological and phytogeographic characteristics, as well as in terms of the richness in endemics, relict or threatened plant species was published in our previous note (see Oprea & Sîrbu 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2 – Fruticose Species
    Appendix 5.2-1 Vegetation Technical Appendix APPENDIX 5.2‐1 Vegetation Technical Appendix Contents Section Page Ecological Land Classification ............................................................................................................ A5.2‐1‐1 Geodatabase Development .............................................................................................. A5.2‐1‐1 Vegetation Community Mapping ..................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control ............................................................................ A5.2‐1‐3 Limitations of Ecological Land Classification .................................................................... A5.2‐1‐3 Field Data Collection ......................................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐3 Supplementary Results ..................................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐4 Rare Vegetation Species and Rare Ecological Communities ........................................................... A5.2‐1‐10 Supplementary Desktop Results ..................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐10 Field Methods ................................................................................................................. A5.2‐1‐16 Supplementary Results ................................................................................................... A5.2‐1‐17 Weed Species
    [Show full text]